The Pope’s death falls on the delta of Drop 1231 which says:

“What will next week hold?
MOAB”

👀👀👀

XPOST

Last month I wrote a Substack detailing the profess of Conclave and I also took a look at who the frontrunners are to become the next Pope - including a couple of Conservatives who could quickly change the complexion of the Church.

I’d recommend a look-see given the current situation.

Read the article in full here: https://absolute1776.substack.com/p/whos-next

XPOST

The U.S. attorney for the nation’s capital sent a letter last week to a former member of special counsel Robert Mueller’s team, scrutinizing the Mueller prosecutor’s role in targeting and convicting former Trump campaign associate George Papadopoulos.

Ed Martin, who has been the interim U.S. Attorney for D.C. since January 20, sent the letter to ex-Mueller prosecutor Aaron Zelinsky, who resigned from the Justice Department following Trump’s 2024 victory. Trump nominated Martin for the full-time position in March, while Senate Democrats have been seeking to delay or block his nomination.

“Declassified Federal Bureau of Investigation documents released under federal Freedom of Information laws have raised questions about the integrity and legality of your work as a federal prosecutor in the Robert Mueller special counsel investigation — a probe which failed to prove then-candidate Donald Trump’s campaign colluded with Russia and is now known to be falsely predicated,” the U.S. attorney told the former Mueller team member in a Monday letter obtained by Just the News and first reported by the New York Sun. Martin also raised questions about Zelinsky’s stint a decade ago teaching at a Chinese Communist Party-linked law school in China.

Zelinksy said in late February that “I'm excited to join a group of smart, talented, and fearless lawyers at Zuckerman Spaeder LLP.” His law firm bio notes that he “served as Assistant Special Counsel to Robert S. Mueller, III, where he led the Special Counsel Office’s investigation and prosecution of Roger Stone and George Papadopoulos.”
READ | XPOST

11:17 and the new Easter Bunny is wearing a nice green shirt 🐰🐸🇺🇸

Say wut? Why confess this now? And wtaf? 😳🤯

Shannon Sharpe has just been sued for allegedly raping a woman on multiple occasions ... and the plaintiff in the case is asking for tens of millions in damages.

The lawsuit, obtained by TMZ Sports, was filed by a Jane Doe on Sunday in Nevada ... after she says Sharpe brutally sexually assaulted her several times at the end of 2024 and the beginning of 2025 -- following a yearslong, abusive relationship.

According to the suit, Doe met Sharpe in 2023 at a gym in Los Angeles -- when she was 20 years old and he was in his mid-50s. She stated in the docs during their first encounter, Sharpe told her he would "buy her fake t**s" if she won a weight-loss competition with him.

She wrote in the suit Sharpe proceeded to pursue her relentlessly, calling, texting and "demanding she come to his Beverly Glen mansion."

The woman stated she and the former Denver Broncos tight end ultimately got into a consensual relationship, though she described it as controlling and verbally abusive.

Doe claimed there was one argument in particular that terrified her -- when he yelled at her while a firearm was visible in the room.
READ | XPOST

Shannon Sharpe has gone on the offensive.

Sued on Sunday for assault, sexual assault, battery, sexual battery, and intentional infliction of emotional distress, Sharpe has fired back. His lawyer, Lanny J. Davis, has issued a statement characterizing the civil suit as “a blatant and cynical attempt to shake down Mr. Sharpe for millions of dollars” and claiming the litigation has been “orchestrated by her attorney Tony Buzbee.”

“It is filled with lies, distortions, and misrepresentations,” Davis says of the civil complaint, “and it will not succeed.”

Davis contends that the plaintiff “secretly recorded” the “video of a consensual sexual encounter” in order to “falsely portray a consensual sexual act as non-consensual.” Davis claims the video was “heavily edited and taken entirely out of context,” and that the plaintiff has “refused to provide a copy of the full, unedited version” to Sharpe’s lawyers.

Davis adds that Sharpe “believes her secret taping was all part of her planned set-up as part of her blackmail scheme.”
READ | XPOST