Forwarded from Dot Connecting Anons | Melissa Hallman (page name to change soon) (๐๐๐๐พ๐๐๐ถ)
PHIZER SCANDAL๐จ: Rep Jim Jordan has uncovered new information suggesting senior Phizer Executives conspired to delay clinical testing on the Covid-19 Vaccine in an effort to influence the 2020 election.
XPOST
XPOST
Forwarded from Dot Connecting Anons | Melissa Hallman (page name to change soon) (๐๐๐๐พ๐๐๐ถ)
Dot Connecting Anons | Melissa Hallman (page name to change soon)
PHIZER SCANDAL๐จ: Rep Jim Jordan has uncovered new information suggesting senior Phizer Executives conspired to delay clinical testing on the Covid-19 Vaccine in an effort to influence the 2020 election. XPOST
MORE from WSJ: Lawmakers are investigating whether Pfizer waited to share results of the Covid vaccine in 2020 until after that yearโs presidential election, based on new allegations that a former Pfizer scientist has said he was part of an effort to โdeliberately slow downโ the testing, according to a new letter from the House Judiciary Committee.
The House panel is seeking information from Pfizer and from the scientist, Philip Dormitzer, after learning he allegedly told colleagues in 2024 at a subsequent job he was worried he would face an investigation of his role in the vaccineโs release and asked to be relocated to Canada.
Dormitzer has since denied that he or anyone at Pfizer tried to delay the vaccine, and has said that his comments to colleagues at drugmaker GSK, where he took a job in 2021, have been misinterpreted. GSK first reported Dormitzerโs alleged comments to federal prosecutors in New York late last year, leading them to launch a probe into Pfizerโs vaccine timing.
According to GSKโs account to the House panel, Dormitzer told colleagues at the British drugmaker last year that three of the most senior people at Pfizer R&D were โinvolved in a decision to deliberately slow down clinical testing so that it would not be complete prior to the results of the presidential election that year.โ
The GSK employees also recounted that Dormitzer โwas clear that this was not a situation of delaying disclosure of completed results but was a situation of slowing down results before disclosure became necessary,โ according to the letter.
GSKโs report to the house panel alleges that in asking for the move to Canada, a โvisibly upsetโ Dormitzer told a GSK human resources official that the timing of the release โwasnโt a coincidence.โ
XPOST
The House panel is seeking information from Pfizer and from the scientist, Philip Dormitzer, after learning he allegedly told colleagues in 2024 at a subsequent job he was worried he would face an investigation of his role in the vaccineโs release and asked to be relocated to Canada.
Dormitzer has since denied that he or anyone at Pfizer tried to delay the vaccine, and has said that his comments to colleagues at drugmaker GSK, where he took a job in 2021, have been misinterpreted. GSK first reported Dormitzerโs alleged comments to federal prosecutors in New York late last year, leading them to launch a probe into Pfizerโs vaccine timing.
According to GSKโs account to the House panel, Dormitzer told colleagues at the British drugmaker last year that three of the most senior people at Pfizer R&D were โinvolved in a decision to deliberately slow down clinical testing so that it would not be complete prior to the results of the presidential election that year.โ
The GSK employees also recounted that Dormitzer โwas clear that this was not a situation of delaying disclosure of completed results but was a situation of slowing down results before disclosure became necessary,โ according to the letter.
GSKโs report to the house panel alleges that in asking for the move to Canada, a โvisibly upsetโ Dormitzer told a GSK human resources official that the timing of the release โwasnโt a coincidence.โ
XPOST
Forwarded from Charlie Kirk
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
JUSTICE CLARENCE THOMAS: "So, we survived until the 1960s without universal injunctions?"
SOLICITOR GENERAL JOHN SAUER: "Correct. Those were rare in the 1960s, it exploded in 2007."
It's time to abolish black robe tyranny.
SOLICITOR GENERAL JOHN SAUER: "Correct. Those were rare in the 1960s, it exploded in 2007."
It's time to abolish black robe tyranny.
I donโt care if someone has 10k followers, 50k followers, 100k followers or 1m followersโฆ
Donโt EVER let anyone tell you how you should feel or what you should believe.
Free will is a thing.
Discernment is a thing.
Iโm here to show you a door - it is your choice to walk through that door.
Iโm not here to ram my opinion down your throat, preach at you, or tell you what you need to believe.
Conversely - Iโm also not here to be told what to believe, how I should decode, what I can talk about or who I can work with.
Donโt EVER let anyone tell you how you should feel or what you should believe.
Free will is a thing.
Discernment is a thing.
Iโm here to show you a door - it is your choice to walk through that door.
Iโm not here to ram my opinion down your throat, preach at you, or tell you what you need to believe.
Conversely - Iโm also not here to be told what to believe, how I should decode, what I can talk about or who I can work with.
Forwarded from Defender of the Republic ๐บ๐ธ
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
President Trumpโs motorcade this evening, in the United Arab Emiratesโฆ - @Scavino47
Forwarded from Defender of the Republic ๐บ๐ธ
Forwarded from Dot Connecting Anons | Melissa Hallman (page name to change soon) (๐๐๐๐พ๐๐๐ถ)
๐จMid-day roundup on today's top stories you may have missed.
READ | XPOST
Please consider subscribing to my new Substackโก๏ธ https://thedailydots.substack.com/
READ | XPOST
Please consider subscribing to my new Substack
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Remember. Not all Angels are benevolent.
Even Lucifer was an angel.
Even Lucifer was an angel.
Know what grinds my gears?
Folks that deny Christ or Christianity without ever having read the Bible. And to be clear - Iโm speaking of those that step up on a soapbox denouncing Christianity
Now, to be even clearer - I believe the spiritual journey is our own. And I applaud anyone walking their path and finding their beliefs.
However โฆ
How can you know something wonโt resonate with you if you wonโt even read the source material?
How can you label it a โmythโ if youโve never taken the time to read it and discern it?
There are plenty of folks I see completely dismiss all of it without reading it.
Tbh, I have far more respect for those who have read it, and then come to the conclusion it isnโt for them. It is the exact same thing I have done with many religions and their associated teachings.
How can you claim to be โenlightenedโ or seeking spiritual ascension if you refuse to read all the theological text that you can get your hands on?
The most common excuse is that โman wrote it so he could have altered itโ. Neat story. Man wrote the Torah, too. And the Vedas. And the Buddhist Canons. Man wrote the Emerald Tablets, and The Law Of One - but youโll believe those menโs words as opposed to the Bible - of which countless stories have been corroborated throughout history, btw.
According to them, the Bible is the only spiritual text in history that could have been altered.
Mmkay. Totally makes senseโฆ
If one was altered by man in order to gain control over people, then all were altered by man in order to gain control over people.
Ego is the anesthesia that deadens the pain of ignorance...
Put it this way: Imagine dismissing the fact that election fraud exists without even looking at the evidence, because it is literally no different than people dismissing Christianity having never read the Good Book.
There is a reason 1/3 of the worldโs population is Christian, and it isnโt because we are all โbrainwashedโ or โindoctrinatedโ. Itโs because a fair number of us began reading the Bible and then realized it is the truth.
If you wanna dismiss it after reading it, then so be it. But what do you have to lose by reading it? Other than perhaps your pride after realizing that book is a lot more truthful than you ever gave it credit for.
/endrant
XPOST
Folks that deny Christ or Christianity without ever having read the Bible. And to be clear - Iโm speaking of those that step up on a soapbox denouncing Christianity
Now, to be even clearer - I believe the spiritual journey is our own. And I applaud anyone walking their path and finding their beliefs.
However โฆ
How can you know something wonโt resonate with you if you wonโt even read the source material?
How can you label it a โmythโ if youโve never taken the time to read it and discern it?
There are plenty of folks I see completely dismiss all of it without reading it.
Tbh, I have far more respect for those who have read it, and then come to the conclusion it isnโt for them. It is the exact same thing I have done with many religions and their associated teachings.
How can you claim to be โenlightenedโ or seeking spiritual ascension if you refuse to read all the theological text that you can get your hands on?
The most common excuse is that โman wrote it so he could have altered itโ. Neat story. Man wrote the Torah, too. And the Vedas. And the Buddhist Canons. Man wrote the Emerald Tablets, and The Law Of One - but youโll believe those menโs words as opposed to the Bible - of which countless stories have been corroborated throughout history, btw.
According to them, the Bible is the only spiritual text in history that could have been altered.
Mmkay. Totally makes senseโฆ
If one was altered by man in order to gain control over people, then all were altered by man in order to gain control over people.
Ego is the anesthesia that deadens the pain of ignorance...
Put it this way: Imagine dismissing the fact that election fraud exists without even looking at the evidence, because it is literally no different than people dismissing Christianity having never read the Good Book.
There is a reason 1/3 of the worldโs population is Christian, and it isnโt because we are all โbrainwashedโ or โindoctrinatedโ. Itโs because a fair number of us began reading the Bible and then realized it is the truth.
If you wanna dismiss it after reading it, then so be it. But what do you have to lose by reading it? Other than perhaps your pride after realizing that book is a lot more truthful than you ever gave it credit for.
/endrant
XPOST
Forwarded from AษฏฦษฏฮฑษพิMฮฑษฑฮฑโขยฎ
Forwarded from Rev DQ ๐บ๐ธ๐ธ๐ฟ
4:49 = 17? ๐ธ
71 likes = 17 mirrored? ๐ธ๐ช
71 likes = 17 mirrored? ๐ธ๐ช
Frens - No live episode tonight as Iโm a bit under the weather - But never fear! We have put together a collection of proofs and decodes for you to enjoy!
Show starts at 9pm ET.
Watch - https://rumble.com/v6tfjl7-absolute-storm-ep.-25-9pm-et-51525-q-proofshistory-of-qdecodes.html
Show starts at 9pm ET.
Watch - https://rumble.com/v6tfjl7-absolute-storm-ep.-25-9pm-et-51525-q-proofshistory-of-qdecodes.html
Forwarded from Dot Connecting Anons | Melissa Hallman (page name to change soon) (๐๐๐๐พ๐๐๐ถ)
The โฆ *Hurricanes* (a storm) won their first 2 series in 5 games each.
5:5
We eliminated the *Devils* and the *Capitals*. ๐
Also, our coaches number was 17.
It is literally everywhere. ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ
Disclaimer (cuz God knows some out there would take it otherwise): no. It has nothing to do with Q or โthe planโ. Thatโs not what Iโm saying.
Iโm saying that when you realize Q and God are a lot closer than many realize or are even willing to acknowledge, then you realize that God is the one leaving all the nods, signs, and synchronicities with said number (17).
17 = Total victory in The Bible.
God wins. God is in control.
XPOST
5:5
We eliminated the *Devils* and the *Capitals*. ๐
Also, our coaches number was 17.
It is literally everywhere. ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ
Disclaimer (cuz God knows some out there would take it otherwise): no. It has nothing to do with Q or โthe planโ. Thatโs not what Iโm saying.
Iโm saying that when you realize Q and God are a lot closer than many realize or are even willing to acknowledge, then you realize that God is the one leaving all the nods, signs, and synchronicities with said number (17).
17 = Total victory in The Bible.
God wins. God is in control.
XPOST
Exhibit 1: YMCA is played at The Vatican by a marching band while marching through St. Peters Basilica.
They were wearing blue.
Exhibit 2: The White House was lit up blue this evening. (h/t: @NewsTreason)
Exhibit 3: Blue holds many meanings in The Bible. Including (but not limited to): Consecration, Divine Revelation and Heavenly Connection.
(Read here for more: https://christianfaithguide.com/what-does-blue-symbolize-in-the-bible/)
We were told that โsymbolism would be their downfallโ.
Does it make sense that such a large scale operation would be taking place without the use of our own symbolism?
Of course not.
XPOST
They were wearing blue.
Exhibit 2: The White House was lit up blue this evening. (h/t: @NewsTreason)
Exhibit 3: Blue holds many meanings in The Bible. Including (but not limited to): Consecration, Divine Revelation and Heavenly Connection.
(Read here for more: https://christianfaithguide.com/what-does-blue-symbolize-in-the-bible/)
We were told that โsymbolism would be their downfallโ.
Does it make sense that such a large scale operation would be taking place without the use of our own symbolism?
Of course not.
XPOST