Oh FFS; not only did this dude not lose his license but the judge suspended the wildly lenient twelve month sentence and instead ordered the convicted predator to carry out 150 days of unpaid work for reasons, I guess. Oh. He has to attend a whopping 35 sessions of sex offender rehab, too. All because losing his good character and job working with children & adolescents at the Tavi was deemed punishment enough.

According to his profile on the LinkedIn website, he was the lead and 'highly specialist' psychologist at the trust. It is understood he did not treat patients at the hospital's controversial gender clinic.

Sauce

Ivanka and the Love & Light Foundation with 300 more Starlinks for NC via the Cajun Navy.

Hey frens I wanted to help out in some way during these hard times for people after the storm and my bff and husband have been hit by it. So I had some help to set up a givesendgo for them and their family.

Share where you can and let’s help them till they find out what they are gonna do.

Here’s the link! https://www.givesendgo.com/Deschamps-donation

We didn't become Anons by greedily gulping down propaganda.

In the wake of a VP Debate that most believe JD Vance won in a landslide, I was somewhat surprised to see a fair bit of capitulation to that very point within the Media Industrial Complex, while it's similarly notable that a man many of us refer to as the signal within the noise even more strongly threw his support behind the man he picked to appear on the ticket and in the story with him ahead of the November 5 inflection point.

I think taking a Bicameral approach to these narrative patterns avails us well.

We don't have to trust Vance just because he's being thrust into the spotlight at this point in time, especially when he enjoys the support of the Con Inc. doom brigade; that said, his presence in the race seems to be sending the traditional media vultures into a tailspin, unsure which way is up.

As always, this sort of narrative chaos tends to behoove the Infinite Player on the game board.

And that's usually Trump.

From GAG NC.

New Substack
With a video I did specifically for Substack

Link:

https://stormypatriotjoe.substack.com/p/eye-of-the-storm-169-and-bonus-video?utm_medium=ios

Please see my latest Substack.

Link:


https://open.substack.com/pub/stormypatriotjoe/p/was-the-bank-of-america-outage-related?r=1pysqo&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

The Diddy accomplices to be revealed soon - this is blowing up!

You probably don’t feel like you do much, but we have a chance to turn all of this around because of you.

Thank you for being a light on the hill, and keeping faith.

Turning points are rarely comfortable.

Modern problems require modern solutions. 😂

I'm sure it's totes coincidental that the WaPo dropped this "newsletter" right behind Schiff's call for more censorship on social media.

And it's a bit odd the WaPo notes this is from a "fill-in" writer who spooksplains a collaborative think tank study released yesterday re conservatives posting so much misinfo, it's why we get suspended in far greater numbers than satanists & marxists on social media. They even hauled out algebraic equations to quantify their unbiased results. Jerks.

Given the findings, Menczer said, social media companies would have to be biased in favor of conservatives to sanction liberals at an equal rate.

We begin to shed new empirical light on this issue by taking a specific social media policy choice that has drawn intense criticism as a case study: Twitter’s suspension of users following the 2020 US presidential election. Specifically, in October 2020 we identified 100,000 Twitter users who shared hashtags related to the US presidential election, and randomly sampled 4,500 of those users who shared at least one #VoteBidenHarris2020 hashtag and 4,500 who shared at least one #Trump2020 hashtag.

First, accusations of political bias are based largely on anecdotes or salient unique cases, such as the suspension of former President Donald Trump. Our data allow us to evaluate these claims more systematically. Indeed, we find that accounts that had shared #Trump2020 during the election were 4.4 times more likely to have been subsequently suspended than those that shared #VoteBidenHarris2020 (χ2(1) = 486.9, P < 0.0001). Specifically, whereas only 4.5% of the users who shared Biden hashtags had been suspended as of July 2021, 19.6% of the users who shared Trump hashtags had been suspended.

Archived sauce

Archived study