🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥🔥 🇮🇷 IRGC ORDERS AL-JAZEERA EVACUATION

⚠️ An urgent warning

to all those who incite the killing of the Iranian people through misleading media, and to those who have turned into platforms speaking on behalf of the terrorist American army and the Zionist entity against the Iranian people, especially those who operate from Qatar: We will soon discipline you.

🇮🇷⚔️🇮🇱 IDF: These are not new missiles or hypersonic missiles, these are missiles that have already been launched in the past into Israeli territory and are known to the IDF.

The are like family, so please dont panic and run back to Europe 😁

🇮🇷Khatam al-Anbiyaa:

🔴 After monitoring and fully analyzing the enemies' weaknesses during the first three weeks of the war, the intelligence and operations commanders of the armed forces introduced new offensive tactics and more modern systems in the new round of operations affecting the battlefield.

The enemy's battlefield will, God willing, be narrower and more difficult than before...

🟢 🇮🇷 General Radan addressed the European Union with a tongue in cheek remark during a speech at a public gathering:

"If you don't have the supply, manpower or ability to preserve and defend Greenland, just ask and we will come."

😂

❗️ An important warning for settlers:

Dimona has become a legitimate target for missiles of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps, and your vaunted missile defense has collapsed. Therefore, you must evacuate or turn into charred corpses.

❗🇮🇱🇺🇸/🇮🇷 Until Iranian armed force take responsibility and confirmed the attack on Diego Garcia Base.

We can assume that talking about missiles with a range of 4,000 km is part of the Israeli propaganda to push Europe to help Trump, driven by averting the danger of Iranian missiles that threaten the European continent.

Trump's officials, and before them Netanyahu, had literally stated that Iran's missiles threaten Europe and that war is a necessity for the world.

A message to Washington?

In a tightly structured 12-minute address, Ayatollah Imam Sayyed Mojtaba Khamenei moved from familiar rhetoric into something far more consequential. The opening half followed the expected script; revisiting decades of U.S. warmongering rhetoric: sanctions, assassinations, regional conflicts.

But midway through, the tone shifted from retrospective to strategic.

Sayyed Khamenei outlined three concrete demands, each with a defined timeline: a rapid U.S. military withdrawal from the Middle East, a full rollback of sanctions within 60 days, and long-term financial compensation for economic damages.

Then came the ultimatum. Fail to comply, and Iran escalates, economically, militarily, and potentially nuclearly. Not hypothetically, but operationally: closing the Strait of Hormuz, formalizing defense ties with Russia and China, and moving from ambiguity to declared nuclear deterrence.

The timing of external reactions was just as telling. Within hours, both Beijing and Moscow issued statements aligning, carefully but unmistakably, with Tehran's framing. This definitely looked coordinated.

The broader context matters. Sayyed Mojtaba Khamenei represents a different leadership style from his martyred predecessor leader. Where martyr Sayyed Ali Khamenei operated through long-term balancing and controlled escalation, Sayyed Mojtaba appears positioned to deliver faster, more decisive outcomes.

Iran's internal reports are clear, the Islamic Revolution Guard Corps is in no way, shape or form interested in incrementalism. They are pushing for structural change: removing U.S. influence from the region, restoring Iran's military standing, and forcing a re-negotiation of global power dynamics.

And for the first time in decades, Iran practically has the leverage to do this.

Rising oil prices, regional instability, growing alignment with China and Russia, and vulnerabilities in global trade routes have shifted the strategic landscape.

So this was not just a speech. It was a test. A test of whether the United States is willing, or even able, to operate under a new set of constraints.

What happens next will likely define not just the trajectory of this conflict, but the broader balance of power in the Middle East for decades to come.