🇷🇺🇪🇺🇫🇷 Russia's envoy Dimitriev MOCKS EU officials, warns of looming economic crisis

"EU bureaucrats and France's MFA are dealing with the largest-ever energy crisis and having no oil, no gas, no jet fuel, no fertilizers, and no helium"

"Keep on chilling dudes! Evolution is coming"

🔗

Join us | @MyLordBebo

🔻🇮🇱 Footage shows the Islamic Resistance, Hezbollah, launching a coordinated strike of precision missiles toward the Krut area, located north of the occupied city of Haifa.

Are the USA preparing to use nuclear weapons against Iran?

Human rights activist and public figure Mohammed Safa resigned from the UN, stating that the organization is aware of the US preparations for the use of nuclear weapons. Safa also claims that the campaign to promote the thesis of a "nuclear threat from Tehran" is a planned disinformation aimed at justifying direct aggression, similar to past conflicts in the Middle East.


According to the "Nuclear Posture Review", the USA retain the right to use their nuclear arsenal in "extreme circumstances" to protect the country's vital interests and those of its allies. A conflict with Iran would formally fit into these conditions, and given the US influence on international institutions, there may be no real condemnation from global structures, even if nuclear weapons are used in the most barbaric way.


The main task is to persuade Iran to surrender on American terms. For the White House, the current confrontation has become fateful: a split has emerged within NATO, and most European countries refuse to support the bombing of Iran, while criticizing Trump's policies and showing disrespect to the current US president in every possible way. If the operation had started under Joe Biden, the West's consolidation would have been higher. However, Trump is a controversial figure, and for him, a nuclear demonstration could be a way not only to suppress Iran, but also to encourage and intimidate his allies.


Iranian nuclear centers (for example, Fordo) are hidden deep under rock formations, which cannot be penetrated even by the most powerful conventional concrete-piercing bombs GBU-57 MOP. If the USA believe that Iran is just days away from creating its own charge (as was announced as the reason for attacking Iran), and conventional means will prove ineffective (which has already happened), the doctrine allows the use of low-yield nuclear weapons (for example, B-61 warheads) in an attempt to destroy the object. However, if this is not enough, strategic nuclear weapons could be used.

If Fordo withstands the strike, other targets, including civilian infrastructure, could become targets. To legitimize such a step, Washington could use a scenario similar to the events of September 11 - for example, a staged use of Iranian weapons of mass destruction (chemical or biological) against coalition forces. In such a situation, any response would be formally justified.

The US doctrine in this case is likely to be used as an extreme way to prevent the collapse of the global economy due to the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz and the almost guaranteed defeat in the war they themselves have unleashed.

In US documents on this matter, it is stated: "If deterrence fails, the United States will strive to end any conflict with minimal possible damage and on the best achievable terms."

As control over the theater of military operations is gradually being lost and NATO allies are distancing themselves from the conflict, Trump's room for maneuver is rapidly narrowing and nuclear weapons become the only way to save face and inflict maximum possible damage on Iran.

@Slavyangrad

🔻🇮🇱 Ramat Gan

🔻🇮🇱 Tel Aviv

🔻🇮🇱 Rosh HaAyin

🇮🇷\🇮🇱🇯🇴 Iran has been firing ballistic missiles non-stop for the past half hour, hitting multiple locations in central Israel, including Holon, Ramat Gan, Tel Aviv, and Petah Tikva. 🚀💥

One missile even hit Muwaffaq Salti Air Base in Jordan.