This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Fucking AI I so badly was hoping this was real lol
π€£16
Forwarded from DoomPosting
Which place has the highest density of right-wing women?
Anonymous Poll
8%
Staten Island, NY (π΄ 64.9% lean right)
13%
Manhattan, NY (π΅ 17.6% lean right)
5%
San Francisco, CA (π΅ 16.2% lean right)
46%
Montgomery County, TX (π΄ 73.0% lean right)
24%
Utah County, UT (π΄ 70.6% lean right)
3%
Washington, D.C. (π΅ 6.7% lean right)
β€4
Forwarded from DoomPosting
Manhattan has vastly higher density of right-wing women than virtually anywhere else
Over 100x higher than many of the supposed right-wing paradises
But but but⦠no, stfu
Objectively, by the numbers, Manhattan has vastly higher density of right-wing women
Ask the AIs yourself if you donβt believe it
But what if you canβt tell which ones are right wing?
Sftu, thatβs extremely easy to tell
Matches my personal experiences as well, met vastly more right-wing women in Manhattan than any supposed right-wing places Iβve ever been
Yes, you were all wrong, except the 1 other person who clicked Manhattan
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
Over 100x higher than many of the supposed right-wing paradises
But but but⦠no, stfu
Objectively, by the numbers, Manhattan has vastly higher density of right-wing women
Ask the AIs yourself if you donβt believe it
But what if you canβt tell which ones are right wing?
Sftu, thatβs extremely easy to tell
Matches my personal experiences as well, met vastly more right-wing women in Manhattan than any supposed right-wing places Iβve ever been
Yes, you were all wrong, except the 1 other person who clicked Manhattan
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π₯4β€1
Forwarded from DoomPosting
Manhattan has vastly higher density of right-wing women than virtually anywhere else
~100x more than many of the supposed most right-wing places
Literally
Why does density matter?
Because in dating, proximity is almost everything
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
~100x more than many of the supposed most right-wing places
Literally
Why does density matter?
Because in dating, proximity is almost everything
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―2
Forwarded from DoomPosting
For reference,
The poll-selected winners are ~30x to ~65x less dense with right-wing women
Horribly backward
Where do you find the most right-wing women?
β¦in some of the places with the strongest left-wing reputation
Dating isnβt first-past-the-post voting
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
The poll-selected winners are ~30x to ~65x less dense with right-wing women
Horribly backward
Where do you find the most right-wing women?
β¦in some of the places with the strongest left-wing reputation
Dating isnβt first-past-the-post voting
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπΎπ π πΈπ½πΆ
π―3
βXβs algorithm learns what you hate and shows you more of it, according to a new study just published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciencesβ -404
Xβs algorithm learns what you hate and shows you more of it, according to a new study just published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). The paper, titled Value misalignment of Xβs feed algorithm is a reflection of value tensions in engagement, found that the siteβs algorithm prioritized engagement above all else when it generated a userβs For You Page. It also showed that X serves more ragebait to people who say they are Democrats, although the exact reason for that is unclear.
βIn 2026 thatβs maybe not the most surprising headline ever,β Ziv Epstein, a postdoctoral researcher at Stanford University, and co-author of the paper, told 404 Media. βSo we actually dug in a little deeper to figure out why this is actually happening, and it turns out that X's feed algorithm, like a lot of these social media algorithms, is optimized for engagement [but] it turns out that not all types of engagement are considered equally.β
Xβs algorithm learns what you hate and shows you more of it, according to a new study just published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). The paper, titled Value misalignment of Xβs feed algorithm is a reflection of value tensions in engagement, found that the siteβs algorithm prioritized engagement above all else when it generated a userβs For You Page. It also showed that X serves more ragebait to people who say they are Democrats, although the exact reason for that is unclear.
βIn 2026 thatβs maybe not the most surprising headline ever,β Ziv Epstein, a postdoctoral researcher at Stanford University, and co-author of the paper, told 404 Media. βSo we actually dug in a little deeper to figure out why this is actually happening, and it turns out that X's feed algorithm, like a lot of these social media algorithms, is optimized for engagement [but] it turns out that not all types of engagement are considered equally.β
404 Media
X's Algorithm Feeds Off Ragebait and Impacts Democrats More, Study Finds
X is driving engagement by making users fight in the replies.
π€£4
Forwarded from DoomPosting
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
In a low-trust society like NYC, not even the plants are safe
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
π³πΎπΎπΌπΏπ€π π πΈπ½πΆ
Forwarded from Doomsday Fitness (Brandon)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Eye gym ππͺ do this if youre a desk jockey #doomsdayfitness
π₯4π4
Forwarded from Doomsday Fitness (Brandon)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Train the eyes chico ππ§ #doomsdayfitness
π₯3π₯°2
Forwarded from Doomsday Fitness (Brandon)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Train your eyes at the top of every hour if you look at screens all day ππͺπ§ #doomsdayfitness
π4
Forwarded from Doomsday Fitness (Brandon)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Eye ball break #doomsdayfitness
π4
Forwarded from Doomsday Fitness (Brandon)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Train your eyes ππͺ #doomsdayfitness
π₯7π₯°1π1π1