Forwarded from Ramon Quesada - News 🌷 (@RamonQuesada 🌷)
Ver "Desayuno - Webinar: El libro blanco del Bitcoin" en YouTube
https://youtu.be/OKR5EoA0RrQ
https://youtu.be/OKR5EoA0RrQ
YouTube
Desayuno - Webinar: El libro blanco del Bitcoin. Parte 1
En esta oportunidad desglosamos y explicamos el Libro Blanco de Bitcoin con el objetivo de entender las motivaciones que llevaron a este desarrollo y explicar toda la ciencia que hay detrás de esta maravillosa tecnología
Let me explain something to everyone about bitcoin. The protocol is fixed. There is a unilateral contract that was set in 2009 when the product was released. That contract has no provision for change. Rather, it has a promise of stability. While some of the codes that are currently disabled will not be re-enabled anytime soon others will be. None of this will impact any existing transaction now all that may exist in the future. But, you have no guarantee or promise of when some of the other codes that are not currently used will be implemented and you shouldn’t be developing anything that is based on them.
The operation of nodes is very simply defined in overview in section 5 of my White Paper. This is not negotiable. It does not matter that you don’t like it. It does not matter if you think it can be optimised in a better way or improved. That is it. Simplicity is actually a good thing in complex systems.
There is no consensus on block cap. Honestly, I’m getting tired of this and it should be what can be handled by the majority of nodes. That is by computational power. If the size of the blocks is too large for a node, this is capitalism and that node goes out of business. If you want to run a rasberrypie go to BTC.
In time... It will be an INTERESTING year
I won't say more for the moment
Welcome to another day in Bitcoin
CSW
Feb 23, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1645620494472599?thread_ts=1645620494.472599&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4055
The operation of nodes is very simply defined in overview in section 5 of my White Paper. This is not negotiable. It does not matter that you don’t like it. It does not matter if you think it can be optimised in a better way or improved. That is it. Simplicity is actually a good thing in complex systems.
There is no consensus on block cap. Honestly, I’m getting tired of this and it should be what can be handled by the majority of nodes. That is by computational power. If the size of the blocks is too large for a node, this is capitalism and that node goes out of business. If you want to run a rasberrypie go to BTC.
In time... It will be an INTERESTING year
I won't say more for the moment
Welcome to another day in Bitcoin
CSW
Feb 23, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1645620494472599?thread_ts=1645620494.472599&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4055
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Feb 23, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1645620494472599?thread_ts=1645620494.472599&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4055
Feb 23, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1645620494472599?thread_ts=1645620494.472599&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4055
Asunto: Re: Cita de su página de b-money
"... La infraestructura de la red puede admitir una gama completa de transacciones y contratos de depósito en garantía (scrow), pero por ahora el enfoque está en los aspectos básicos del dinero y las transacciones".
Satoshi Nakamoto
10 de enero de 2009
Para: Weidai https://www.gwern.net/docs/bitcoin/2008-nakamoto
"... La infraestructura de la red puede admitir una gama completa de transacciones y contratos de depósito en garantía (scrow), pero por ahora el enfoque está en los aspectos básicos del dinero y las transacciones".
Satoshi Nakamoto
10 de enero de 2009
Para: Weidai https://www.gwern.net/docs/bitcoin/2008-nakamoto
gwern.net
Wei Dai/Satoshi Nakamoto 2009 Bitcoin emails
Emails in 2009 between Wei Dai and Satoshi Nakamoto discussing Bitcoin draft proposal and B-money.
"Desayuno - Webinar El libro blanco del Bitcoin -3ª parte-"
Organizado por el Colegio de Economistas de Valencia (COEV)
9 de Marzo del 2022
https://youtu.be/UgDuFL8fUhI
Organizado por el Colegio de Economistas de Valencia (COEV)
9 de Marzo del 2022
https://youtu.be/UgDuFL8fUhI
YouTube
Desayuno - Webinar El libro blanco del Bitcoin -3ª parte-
I am going to make this nice and clear.
Nodes prune. Any old transaction, any old data, anything that has been spent can be pruned.
Equally, this does not mean that nodes need to prune. However, you cannot guarantee that your data will not be pruned. Nodes (note, nodes are exclusively miners) have the option of keeping or removing data at will. There is a section in my White Paper if you don’t understand this.
Equally, nodes can maintain a complete copy if they so choose. They can equally require payment for access. There is no requirement to distribute the entire Blockchain. In section 7 on page 4 of my White Paper, the reclaiming of disk space may be achieved by removing old spent transactions and even the branches. Block headers can be kept in memory and no more.
The development of overlay networks allows for the complete history to be maintained for limited subsets of the entire Blockchain. This will allow individual token issuers including some of the people on here to have a limited copy of the Blockchain that only serves their clients or people on their token system. Honestly, I really don’t understand why people think you need to validate everyone else’s transactions.
CSW
Apr 13, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1649859044420089?thread_ts=1649859044.420089&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4297
Nodes prune. Any old transaction, any old data, anything that has been spent can be pruned.
Equally, this does not mean that nodes need to prune. However, you cannot guarantee that your data will not be pruned. Nodes (note, nodes are exclusively miners) have the option of keeping or removing data at will. There is a section in my White Paper if you don’t understand this.
Equally, nodes can maintain a complete copy if they so choose. They can equally require payment for access. There is no requirement to distribute the entire Blockchain. In section 7 on page 4 of my White Paper, the reclaiming of disk space may be achieved by removing old spent transactions and even the branches. Block headers can be kept in memory and no more.
The development of overlay networks allows for the complete history to be maintained for limited subsets of the entire Blockchain. This will allow individual token issuers including some of the people on here to have a limited copy of the Blockchain that only serves their clients or people on their token system. Honestly, I really don’t understand why people think you need to validate everyone else’s transactions.
CSW
Apr 13, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1649859044420089?thread_ts=1649859044.420089&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4297
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Apr 13, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1649859044420089?thread_ts=1649859044.420089&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4297
Apr 13, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1649859044420089?thread_ts=1649859044.420089&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4297
I wrote the code in 2007.
It was incomplete, the settings only became fixed in Dec 2008
The paper was in Many iterations
The last PoW version was in 2008.
It was released in May 08, then Oct 08
Then Nov 08
Finally set in Feb 09
Some parts of the paper go to 2003
But, then it was a PoS system
It was stated that a Byzantine problem needs 2/3rds agreement
It always ends in this as an oligarchy
CSW
Jun 19, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1560967786215800?thread_ts=1560966490.195700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4305
It was incomplete, the settings only became fixed in Dec 2008
The paper was in Many iterations
The last PoW version was in 2008.
It was released in May 08, then Oct 08
Then Nov 08
Finally set in Feb 09
Some parts of the paper go to 2003
But, then it was a PoS system
It was stated that a Byzantine problem needs 2/3rds agreement
It always ends in this as an oligarchy
CSW
Jun 19, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1560967786215800?thread_ts=1560966490.195700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4305
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jun 19, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1560967786215800?thread_ts=1560966490.195700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4305
Jun 19, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1560967786215800?thread_ts=1560966490.195700&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4305
"Bitcoin: A Peer-to-peer Electronic Cash System"
https://youtu.be/_x5HQq9up54
https://youtu.be/_x5HQq9up54
YouTube
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-peer Electronic Cash System
An animated reading of the ground-breaking whitepaper that defined Bitcoin. Written by Dr Craig Wright, AKA Satoshi Nakamoto, the Bitcoin whitepaper outlines the principal design intent of the Bitcoin system and gives the reader a clear overview of the system…
Forwarded from CSW. 300 Articles (@RamonQuesada 🌷)
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
9 Pages
Posted: 22 Aug 2019
Dr Craig S Wright
nChain; University of Southern Queensland - University of Southern Queensland, Students; Leicester Law School; University of London, Birkbeck College, School of Social Sciences, History and Philosophy, Politics, Students; Harvard university
Date Written: August 21, 2008
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3440802
9 Pages
Posted: 22 Aug 2019
Dr Craig S Wright
nChain; University of Southern Queensland - University of Southern Queensland, Students; Leicester Law School; University of London, Birkbeck College, School of Social Sciences, History and Philosophy, Politics, Students; Harvard university
Date Written: August 21, 2008
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3440802
Ssrn
Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
A purely peer-to-peer version of electronic cash would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without the burdens of going through
Does anyone have the block ID with the bitcoin White Paper was stored in the database off the top of the head?
CSW
Jun 1, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1654094110098519?thread_ts=1654094110.098519&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4563
CSW
Jun 1, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1654094110098519?thread_ts=1654094110.098519&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4563
2008 361 White Paper- WP
Does anyone have the block ID with the bitcoin White Paper was stored in the database off the top of the head? CSW Jun 1, 2022 https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1654094110098519?thread_ts=1654094110.098519&cid=C5131HKFX https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4563
reddit
The Bitcoin Whitepaper is stored inside the Bitcoin and Bitcoin...
I'm not sure if this has been discussed but something to point out back in 2013 the Bitcoin whitepaper was uploaded into the Bitcoin blockchain to...
2008 361 White Paper- WP
Does anyone have the block ID with the bitcoin White Paper was stored in the database off the top of the head? CSW Jun 1, 2022 https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1654094110098519?thread_ts=1654094110.098519&cid=C5131HKFX https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4563
Whatsonchain
Transaction: 54e48e5f5c656b26c3bca14a8c95aa583d07ebe84dde3b7dd4a78f4e4186e713
Leading Blockchain Explorer for Bitcoin SV. Blocks, Transactions tagged from memo.cash, yours.org, tokenized and OP_RETURN, BSV address balance, Bitcoin SV mining stats. Explorer for all your BSV needs
2008 361 White Paper- WP
Does anyone have the block ID with the bitcoin White Paper was stored in the database off the top of the head? CSW Jun 1, 2022 https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1654094110098519?thread_ts=1654094110.098519&cid=C5131HKFX https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4563
Bitcoin Stack Exchange
How is the whitepaper decoded from the blockchain (Tx with ~1000x m of n multisig outputs)
The whitepaper is apparently encoded at 54e48e5f5c656b26c3bca14a8c95aa583d07ebe84dde3b7dd4a78f4e4186e713, which is an m of n multisig Tx with 947 outputs (just under the scriptsig limit of 20kB!).
...
...