Asunto: Re: Cita de su página de b-money
"... La infraestructura de la red puede admitir una gama completa de transacciones y contratos de depósito en garantía (scrow), pero por ahora el enfoque está en los aspectos básicos del dinero y las transacciones".

Satoshi Nakamoto
10 de enero de 2009
Para: Weidai https://www.gwern.net/docs/bitcoin/2008-nakamoto

"Desayuno - Webinar El libro blanco del Bitcoin -3ª parte-"
Organizado por el Colegio de Economistas de Valencia (COEV)
9 de Marzo del 2022
https://youtu.be/UgDuFL8fUhI

CSW
Mar 1, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1646137493324119

CSW
Mar 16, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1647434435870539?thread_ts=1647434435.870539&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4190

I am going to make this nice and clear.

Nodes prune. Any old transaction, any old data, anything that has been spent can be pruned.

Equally, this does not mean that nodes need to prune. However, you cannot guarantee that your data will not be pruned. Nodes (note, nodes are exclusively miners) have the option of keeping or removing data at will. There is a section in my White Paper if you don’t understand this.

Equally, nodes can maintain a complete copy if they so choose. They can equally require payment for access. There is no requirement to distribute the entire Blockchain. In section 7 on page 4 of my White Paper, the reclaiming of disk space may be achieved by removing old spent transactions and even the branches. Block headers can be kept in memory and no more.

The development of overlay networks allows for the complete history to be maintained for limited subsets of the entire Blockchain. This will allow individual token issuers including some of the people on here to have a limited copy of the Blockchain that only serves their clients or people on their token system. Honestly, I really don’t understand why people think you need to validate everyone else’s transactions.

CSW
Apr 13, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1649859044420089?thread_ts=1649859044.420089&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4297

I wrote the code in 2007.

It was incomplete, the settings only became fixed in Dec 2008

The paper was in Many iterations

The last PoW version was in 2008.

It was released in May 08, then Oct 08

Then Nov 08

Finally set in Feb 09

Some parts of the paper go to 2003

But, then it was a PoS system

It was stated that a Byzantine problem needs 2/3rds agreement

It always ends in this as an oligarchy

CSW
Jun 19, 2019
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1560967786215800?thread_ts=1560966490.195700&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4305

"Bitcoin: A Peer-to-peer Electronic Cash System"
https://youtu.be/_x5HQq9up54

Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System
9 Pages
Posted: 22 Aug 2019
Dr Craig S Wright
nChain; University of Southern Queensland - University of Southern Queensland, Students; Leicester Law School; University of London, Birkbeck College, School of Social Sciences, History and Philosophy, Politics, Students; Harvard university

Date Written: August 21, 2008

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3440802

Bitcoin Nodes
ramonquesada.com
May 26, 2022

https://telegra.ph/Bitcoin-Nodes-05-26

Does anyone have the block ID with the bitcoin White Paper was stored in the database off the top of the head?

CSW
Jun 1, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1654094110098519?thread_ts=1654094110.098519&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4563

https://www.linkedin.com/posts/craigswright_bitcoin-activity-6946072801959149568-nN_Y?

Directly from one party to another...
https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/directly-from-one-party-another-craig-s-wright

Directamente de una parte a otra...
Craig S Wright
2022 06 24
https://es.ramonquesada.com/espanol-es/directamente-de-una-parte-a-otra-craig-s-wright

In discussing privacy (Wright, 2008, p. 6), I discussed the need to limit access to financial information and only have exchanges conducted using the parties involved. Unfortunately, BTC Core and other broken copies of my software have ignored this. So, when you have an exchange of data between Alice and Bob and the index of that data restored on the Blockchain, you have my invention.

Alternatively, when you have communications between Alice, who sends to an intermediary such as a node operator giving out all her information and removing the privacy of her exchange with Bob, you don’t have any of the fundamental privacy aspects of bitcoin. In particular, the use of addresses, as we see commonly employed, was noted to be a backup methodology and not the primary way of distributing information across bitcoin. In fact, the methodology was to be depreciated over time.

When Alice and Bob communicate, they can send invoices and complex information around their contract negotiations that never need to be restricted to the Blockchain. This information can be hashed in the hash of the information and authenticate the documentation around the exchange. As Alice and Bob have done this directly, no record of the communication needs to be placed on the Blockchain outside of the final transaction that acts as an index to all communications that have occurred.

So, while the public sees the ticker tape summary, Alice and Bob completely understand the exchange and what has been bought and sold. If Alice wants to lodge records with the tax office for an expense, this can be validated against the sale done with Bob. While the nodes see the transaction record that Bob has indexed for everyone to check if needed, they receive no information concerning the exchange between Bob and Alice. Further, Bob can verify Alice’s identity, and Alice can verify Bob’s.

This is the nature of decentralisation that everyone seems to be missing. I did not state in my whitepaper that there is no identity. Rather, I explicitly state (Wright, 2008, p. 6) that the new privacy model firewalls identities. The distinction between how bitcoin works and the traditional privacy model involving trusted third parties is that small casual transactions can be done that do not require any public exchange of information concerning identity. This does not mean identity doesn’t exist. As stated, identity remains between the individuals engaged in the trade.

Wright, C. S. (2008). Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3440802

CSW
Jun 13, 2022
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1655122243478809?thread_ts=1655122243.478809&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/4671