@Samooth ha encontrado el white paper en el bloque 230009

Una multisig larga de un cojon de 1sats https://whatsonchain.com/tx/54e48e5f5c656b26c3bca14a8c95aa583d07ebe84dde3b7dd4a78f4e4186e713

https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/35959/how-is-the-whitepaper-decoded-from-the-blockchain-tx-with-1000x-m-of-n-multisi

cuanto más cosas sé, más me doy cuenta de lo poco que sé...

Bitcoin is a predicate machine. Over the following months, we shall explore different aspects that were not explicitly contained within the white paper. These aspects are all parts of bitcoin, and are important. Some of these ideas were touched upon in the early years; now is the time to extrapolate and explain.

https://twitter.com/satoshi/status/1708886029636137256?t=YBSCKoqoJ_uLSEPJqixIGQ&s=19

Sí, hay un texto de Satoshi Nakamoto donde escribe lo siguiente:

"Orphans are a necessary part of the system. They allow nodes to accept transactions without having to wait for confirmations, and they help to prevent double-spending attacks."

Este texto se encuentra en el artículo de Satoshi Nakamoto titulado "Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System", publicado en 2008. En este artículo, Satoshi explica cómo funciona el sistema de consenso de Bitcoin, que se basa en la cadena de bloques.

En el contexto de este artículo, Satoshi está explicando que los bloques huérfanos son transacciones que han sido validadas por un nodo, pero que no han sido confirmadas por la mayoría de la red. Estos bloques huérfanos son una parte necesaria del sistema porque permiten a los nodos aceptar transacciones sin tener que esperar a que se confirmen.
Además, los bloques huérfanos ayudan a prevenir ataques de doble gasto. Un ataque de doble gasto es un intento de gastar los mismos fondos dos veces. Los bloques huérfanos hacen que sea más difícil para un atacante ejecutar un ataque de doble gasto, ya que el atacante tendría que tener control sobre la mayoría de la red para que su transacción sea confirmada.

En resumen, los bloques huérfanos son una parte necesaria del sistema de Bitcoin porque permiten a los nodos aceptar transacciones sin tener que esperar a que se confirmen y ayudan a prevenir ataques de doble gasto.

El texto completo de Satoshi Nakamoto donde escribe lo mencionado anteriormente es el siguiente:
"Orphans are a necessary part of the system. They allow nodes to accept transactions without having to wait for confirmations, and they help to prevent double-spending attacks.

When a node receives a block, it must determine whether to accept it or not. If the block is valid, the node will broadcast it to its peers. If the block is not valid, the node will reject it.
If a node receives a block that it does not like, it can create a competing block that includes the same transactions as the first block, but with a different ordering. This competing block is called an orphan.
Orphans are a necessary part of the system because they allow nodes to accept transactions without having to wait for confirmations. If a node had to wait for confirmations before accepting transactions, it would be more difficult for users to make payments.
Orphans also help to prevent double-spending attacks. A double-spending attack is an attempt to spend the same funds twice. If a node were to successfully double-spend, it would need to create a block that is longer than all of the other blocks in the chain. This would be very difficult to do, as it would require the node to control more than half of the computing power in the network.
Orphans make it more difficult for an attacker to double-spend, as the attacker would need to create a block that is longer than all of the other blocks in the chain, including the orphan blocks. This would be very difficult to do, as it would require the attacker to control more than half of the computing power in the network."


https://g.co/bard/share/50e38ddc6126

Craig Wright Full Testimony: Hodlonaut v Craig Wright - Day 3
3h55
Bitcoin Magazine
129 K suscriptores
28.170 visualizaciones
14 sept 2022
This is the full video from Craig Wright's testimony on day 3 of the Hodlonaut v Craig Wright trial on September 14th, 2022.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_zkweFcpQMs


0:00 - 2:09 - Craig Wright Sworn In
2:09 - 18:13 - Reviewing Tweets on Craig Wright
18:13 - 19:58 - Bitcoin Privacy and Scaling According to Craig Wright
19:58 - 25:35 - Craig Wright debate with Peter Todd
25:35 - 27:24 - Craig Wright debate with Jameson Lopp and Charlie Lee
27:24 - 40:34 - Craig Wright Background
40:34 - 41:29 - Blacknet
41:29 - 43:21 - BDO
43:21 - 45:38 - CSW Coding
45:38 - 49:14 - Development of Bitcoin
49:14 - 49:47 - Encryption and Mining FUD
49:47 - 1:14:37 - Bitcoin Whitepaper
1:14:37 - 1:20:03 - Bitcoin Mining
1:20:03 - 1:23:24 - Relationship with Gavin Andresen
1:23:24 - 1:30:39 - 2011 - 2015 Craig Wright Work
1:30:39 - 1:37:28 - Gizmo and Wired Magazine Claims
1:37:28 - 1:55:10 - Reviewing points in Jameson Lopp Article
1:55:10 - 2:00:26 - Craig Altering Posts
2:00:26 - 2:01:10 - Dave Kleinman 50/50 Partnership
2:01:10 - 2:09:27 - KPMG Report
2:09:27 - 2:10:16 - Inaudible Norwegian Talk
2:10:16 - 2:11:09 - Conclude KPGM / Manipulation of Documents
2:11:09 - 2:12:39 - John Matones Signing Session
2:12:39 - 2:19:04 - Gavin Andresen Signing Session
2:19:04 - 2:21:46 - Gavin Andresen Criticism
2:21:46 - 2:22:38 - O'Hagan Cryptographic Proof
2:22:38 - 2:24:30 - Patents
2:24:30 - 2:25:41 - Craig Wright's Approach
2:25:41 - 3:48:56 - Cross Examination of Craig Wright by Hodlonaut Lawyers
3:48:56 - 3:53:29 - Question from Judge
3:53:29 - 3:54:24 - Craig Lawyer Follow-up Question
3:54:24 - 3:54:59 - Craig Wright Final Remarks