@Samooth ha encontrado el white paper en el bloque 230009

Una multisig larga de un cojon de 1sats https://whatsonchain.com/tx/54e48e5f5c656b26c3bca14a8c95aa583d07ebe84dde3b7dd4a78f4e4186e713

https://bitcoin.stackexchange.com/questions/35959/how-is-the-whitepaper-decoded-from-the-blockchain-tx-with-1000x-m-of-n-multisi

cuanto más cosas sé, más me doy cuenta de lo poco que sé...

2009-03-24.pdf is the one from bitcoin.org and from bitcoin.org of 2010 wayback machine:
https://web.archive.org/web/20100805235904/http://www.bitcoin.org/bitcoin.pdf
MD5: d56d71ecadf2137be09d8b1d35c6c042

10000001: 129
00000000: 0
00000000: 0
00000001: 1
10000000: 128
00000001: 1
00000001: 1
10010000: 144
00000000: 0
00000001: 1
00000000: 0
00000000: 0

no idea what this is

triple spaces are 1, double spaces o
in the whitepaper

Video proof of WHITESPACE STEGANOGRAPHY in the Bitcoin Whitepaper and why specific environment matters when doing a technical test in 36 seconds.

My bet is that it says something like "Craig Steven Wright a.k.a. Satoshi Nakamoto"

BTC is on the EDGE and BSV was built by Satoshi. https://x.com/roman_de_fauvel/status/1756463003015225665?s=20

Video proof of WHITESPACE STEGANOGRAPHY in the Bitcoin Whitepaper and why specific environment matters when doing a technical test in 36 seconds.

My bet is that it says something like "Craig Steven Wright a.k.a. Satoshi Nakamoto"

BTC is on the EDGE and BSV was built by Satoshi. https://x.com/roman_de_fauvel/status/1756463003015225665?s=20

McAfee (RIP) pointed to various language points in the paper that suggest Craig Wright or someone like him may have been involved in the creation of BTC. He says that the paper uses British English over American English, and consistently used “two spaces after a period.”

Too Many Similarities
He explains:

"It was a team of 11 people over a period of five years that came up, eventually, with [bitcoin]. How they decided who would write the paper, I don’t know. But anybody who wants to know who it is – I mean, you know who the options are. You’ve got Craig Wright possibly. I’m not going to name everyone else. Otherwise, you’ll figure out who it is, but somebody wrote the whitepaper."

The format of the document was identical to documents that [Satoshi Nakamoto] had published professionally. If you buy a two hundred-dollar authorship program, and you take the whitepaper and you run it through, and you take any one of the papers that he’s published – all of these people wrote papers by the way – only one comes out with 99 percent probability that it’s him.

https://twitter.com/_electronicCash/status/1756743363234042244?t=MQ_bMvKtY7U82vg-g8w6tQ&s=19