10000001: 129
00000000: 0
00000000: 0
00000001: 1
10000000: 128
00000001: 1
00000001: 1
10010000: 144
00000000: 0
00000001: 1
00000000: 0
00000000: 0

no idea what this is

triple spaces are 1, double spaces o
in the whitepaper

Video proof of WHITESPACE STEGANOGRAPHY in the Bitcoin Whitepaper and why specific environment matters when doing a technical test in 36 seconds.

My bet is that it says something like "Craig Steven Wright a.k.a. Satoshi Nakamoto"

BTC is on the EDGE and BSV was built by Satoshi. https://x.com/roman_de_fauvel/status/1756463003015225665?s=20

Video proof of WHITESPACE STEGANOGRAPHY in the Bitcoin Whitepaper and why specific environment matters when doing a technical test in 36 seconds.

My bet is that it says something like "Craig Steven Wright a.k.a. Satoshi Nakamoto"

BTC is on the EDGE and BSV was built by Satoshi. https://x.com/roman_de_fauvel/status/1756463003015225665?s=20

McAfee (RIP) pointed to various language points in the paper that suggest Craig Wright or someone like him may have been involved in the creation of BTC. He says that the paper uses British English over American English, and consistently used “two spaces after a period.”

Too Many Similarities
He explains:

"It was a team of 11 people over a period of five years that came up, eventually, with [bitcoin]. How they decided who would write the paper, I don’t know. But anybody who wants to know who it is – I mean, you know who the options are. You’ve got Craig Wright possibly. I’m not going to name everyone else. Otherwise, you’ll figure out who it is, but somebody wrote the whitepaper."

The format of the document was identical to documents that [Satoshi Nakamoto] had published professionally. If you buy a two hundred-dollar authorship program, and you take the whitepaper and you run it through, and you take any one of the papers that he’s published – all of these people wrote papers by the way – only one comes out with 99 percent probability that it’s him.

https://twitter.com/_electronicCash/status/1756743363234042244?t=MQ_bMvKtY7U82vg-g8w6tQ&s=19

csw vs hodlnaut - live updates: https://x.com/MetanetIcu/status/1571826964033597445?s=20

I think Craig was claiming the LaTex source file could be watermarked using Snow, not the generated/compiled bitcoin whitepaper pdf. Thus it’s futile to try to extract watermark from the pdf, including from its whitespace-preserving text version. The watermark, if present, can only be found in the original LaTex file.

Transcript: feb 9, 2024
https://twitter.com/kurtwuckertjr/status/1755976411213427160?t=9_km7m6CZU_W4p4TbiVcRw&s=19


PDF watermark with Snow-LaTeX:
https://chat.openai.com/share/c7c3497a-455b-4f1b-8fa0-9b0ba4eafe4a

Bueno parece que dentro del propio White Paper de Bitcoin, si que hay un mensaje cifrado con una técnica que Craig estuvo estudiando antes de la publicación del WP y veremos si Craig hoy ha querido desvelar el mensaje

Bitcoin Trial: Craig Wright's Last Stand? Zcash Clash in Satoshi ID - Hi...
https://youtube.com/watch?v=xbPhh6FTd0U&si=qIHjKumJbR6pkKG6