—❗️🇾🇪/🇸🇦/🇦🇪 NEW: The gatherings of Saudi-backed PLC forces, which were prevented by pro-Emirati factions from entering Aden, were targeted with ballistic missiles by Ansarallah

@Middle_East_Spectator

NOTE: The Houthis do not wish to take the city of Aden by force, and would rather reach a diplomatic settlement with the southerners.

Strikes on the Saudi-backed forces, which are currently perceived as traitors by those in Aden, may incur favors among the southerners.

@Middle_East_Spectator

— 🇸🇦/🇾🇪/🇦🇪 WATCH: A pro-Emirati faction member drives around the outskirts of Aden, showing the annihilation of Saudi-backed forces by Ansarallah’s ballistic missiles

@Middle_East_Spectator

— 🇾🇪 NEW: The Yemeni Armed Forces announce the successful completion of the military operation dubbed ‘God is Strongest in Might and Severe in Punishment’, which liberated 5,400 square kilometers of territory on the Red Sea coast

It is announced that international maritime navigation remains safe and permitted, with the exception of vessels affiliated to Saudi Arabia.

During the offensive, a total of 9 Saudi drones were downed, and hundreds of Saudi-backed soldiers were taken captive.

The Yemeni Armed Forces reiterate the siege against Saudi Arabia will continue and the policy of ‘escalation for escalation’ shall remain.

@Middle_East_Spectator

I have noticed some criticism of the political strategy expressed during my press conference outside the High Court and have decided to address the complaints.

Summary of the political strategy expressed on the 9/9/26.

1. If the White Australia Party was legally allowed to reconstitute under authority of the High Court of Australia, it would contest elections in the Upper and Lower Houses of Government at the next Federal Election.
2. The White Australia Party would preference a Pauline Hanson PM and a One Nation Government over Labor, Liberal and Nationals in the Lower House.
3. The White Australia Party would preference other micro parties on the Right including but not limited to Gerard Rennick, the Libertarians and anyone with a better immigration policy than One Nation in the Upper House, (e.g Sustainability Party, Katter, whatever Clive Palmer cooks up 6 months out).

The primary goals of such a strategy.

1. Break the uni-party hold on forming Government. This will break the public perception that only Lib/Lab are going to run the country for the rest of history.
2. Hold the right-flank of a One Nation Government. One Nation will inevitably concede to the centre and fold into being the new establishment. They haven't even won yet and are already sounded like the Liberal Party. One Nation has potentially mobilised 30%+ of the public on a centre-right populist platform that is borderline associated with remigration and mass deportations rhetoric. Without a party clearly defined as further to the right of One Nation, its right-flank will collapse and it will demobilise/demoralise a significant percentage of its support away from remigration and mass deportation rhetoric, who then enter an apolitical void.
3. Lower House One Nation 'Right Faction' Votes Trust (AKA Counterweight the Greens). A White Australia Party could capture 0.1% - 5% at the next federal election. It is near impossible that the WAP would win even a single Lower House seat at the next election, so why vote preference it? One Nation does not have a 'right faction', it has no internal elections, there is no way to replace Pauline Hanson or keep Pauline Hanson honest within the party, only from without. We must encourage One Nation members and voters who want One Nation to go further to the right to place their votes in our Trust. It may not make sense prior to this election to many One Nation supporters, but over the next 2 or 3 cycles it will. The larger the WAP, the more sway it has over One Nation policy. This strategy has worked extremely effectively in Australia because of how our preferential voting system works. The Greens pull Labor to the Left, the WAP pulls One Nation to the Right. Many boomers have already dubbed this strategy the "I don't agree with the WAP but want them to become more powerful because we need to counterweight the Greens".
4. Upper House Micro Party 'Right Faction' Voting block. It is a very real scenario that the White Australia Party will either gain a seat in the Upper house, or they will be the deciding factor as to whose seat it is. In the Upper House elections the WAP will support right-wing micro-parties above One Nation. A minority One Nation government will not be able to pass bills without the support of either the centre or the far-right. Therefore on matters of immigration, freedom and strengthening Australia, they will either need to water them down to get the centre or make them better to get the right. The more One Nation waters down its principles the more they will be punished at future elections. The less they water them down, they harder they will get anything done, which will most likely result in them getting punished at future elections. One Nation has not the leadership, the depth, nor the strategy to undo this mess.

Complaints and Answers.
1. "One Nation supports ZOG" - So does anyone else that will form Government at the next election. This comment is from people that can't comprehend Australia's preferential voting system. (I believe it may be the Australian pro-White IQ test).
2. "You guys are moderating your position" - No I am not, my position does not change, my policies do not change, One Nation has zero sway over me. Instead, the WAP would have a tiny bit over them (which will grow over future elections).
3. "You guys used to be cool" - When all the "cool" options are leading to 15 years in a concrete box I suggest you personally ask the court to put you in a concrete box for a month so you can mull over my political strategy. Then after your 30 days staring at a wall is done, imagine doing it again 180 times back to back, 1 month down, 179 to go.
4. "This is a bad strategy for revolutionary politics, we must accelerate Weimar conditions, not help elect the centre right." - This is the only semi-intelligent criticism of the strategy, but must be prefaced with an understanding of Australian preferential voting (google it) and 'Heightening the contradictions' AKA 'peaceful acceleration'. Protecting our demographic strength is the primary issue revolutionary politics should not sacrifice at the altar of 'things need to get worse before they get better'. Demographics is the one area that must be non-acceleratory, it is the only thing that must be conserved. More communists? Good! It makes the Right more anti-communist. More degeneracy? Good! It hardens the Right to anti-degeneracy. More economic hardship? Sad sure, but the public aren't going to solve it without feeling more hunger. Less White people? Bad! It popularises the multi-racial Right, it weakens our ability to take the country back. White people that don't like us are somewhat having children, those children in time can side with us no matter how communistic or degenerate their parents are. But the children of our replacements can never be us, they are a body politic infinitely hostile to our Australia. Nothing gets better with less White people from here, no strategy gets stronger, no movement gains more support, it is death by a whimper. The window where people go from being upset about replacement, to being a minority is very short, we are 2 generations into the 'upset' part and we are less than 1 generation away from the 'replaced' part.

In conclusion, the window is short and the general pro-White movement in this country is not ready to form Government, let alone the potential White Australia Party. Assisting a Government that will slow down the White Replacement whilst not being able to fix any of the other issues will buy a real revolutionary movement time to build the future Government. As not cool and not revolutionary as it sounds, slowing down White Replacement is the step before stopping it, stopping it is the step before reversing our demographic decline and advancing ourselves once again in all areas.

— 🇺🇸/🇮🇱 NOTE: After the collapse of the World Trade Center, in which nearly 3,000 Americans died, Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called the 9/11 attacks ‘very good’ and said it would strengthen the bond between Israel and the United States

Reported in a New York Times article, archived and accessible here.

@Middle_East_Spectator