computer science
network design and systems
electrical engineering
electronic engineering
chemical engineering
organic chemistry
Management
engineering management
financial management
econometrics
economics
banking
statistics
psychology
English literature
Art history
applied mathematics
pure mathematics
discrete mathematics
Law
information technology
data science
Logistics
database design
philosophy
education and pedagogy
educational leadership
Asian history
ancient history
archaeology
political science
comparative literature
Medieval history
modern history
classical history
supply chain management
silicon engineering
battery technology
accounting
Finance
biochemistry
econometrics
industrial engineering
Wine science
security engineering
network science
epidemiology
graph theory
Chaos theory
Game theory
theology

and a few more that I will remember later

Telegram Chat
(about CSW post)
Please feel free to share your thoughts and comments about CSW posts.
https://t.me/CSW_SlackChat

"... I am doing two doctorates simultaneously right now, but I am not doing a fraction of the study hours I was doing then. I was living on four hours’ sleep for two years. I was used to being up at 3 AM or 4 AM seven days a week."

The Genesis of Genesis.
By Craig Wright 
12 Apr 2019

https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/the-genesis-of-genesis/?s=09

One of the things that annoys me most is that people fall for common logical fallacies such as ad hominem.

Anyone who has the ability to think rationally will not care about the individual but rather the outcome

In politics, people talk about politicians having associations with business and say that this must necessarily be bad. It isn't. As long as the transactions are open there is nothing wrong with a politician who was also a businessman. As long as the bidding process is open, then there is no issue.

In fact, having politicians who are business people used to be the norm and it helps encourage economic reasoning in this group

The same thing occurs in my case and that of others like me.

We can then extend that to false authority, another logical fallacy

People have come to think that individuals are experts merely for longevity in this field. You are never an expert because you've been in the field for a period of time. An expert can develop in a year or may not develop in twenty years. Expertise is not a function of experience alone

Individual such as Antonopoulos or Eric Voorhees are recognised as experts merely because they were around when I launched bitcoin or just afterwards

That's not a foundation of expertise.

Many individuals attack my qualifications - but if you took the time to think about this there is a reason behind those attacks

none of these individuals have qualifications

none of the individuals being referenced as experts in cryptography or cryptographers are qualified in any way as a cryptographer

A cryptographer is not somebody who has worked developing software code.

Although it is possible that a cryptographer good learn to code, it is not essential in any way for a cryptographer to ever code in their life

Not one individual that I've seen referenced as an expert in bitcoin who is noted to be a cryptographer is qualified to be in an introductory role as a cryptographer

And I'm not making the statement idly

And community is irrelevant here

There are no community standards of being a cryptographer

Equally, even Hal Finney was not even a computer scientist let alone a cryptographer.

It is true that he had worked in the early days in the PGP Corporation.

He worked for a cryptographer.

He developed code for a cryptography company

But that does not make him either a computer scientist or a cryptographer

Dan Kaminsky has been called a cryptographer. The guy has had no real experience of cryptography anywhere in his life

Adam back is referenced as both an expert in distributed systems and a cryptographer
He has no basis in either field

Both Antonopoulos and Voorhees were practically or already homeless when they came to bitcoin.

Voorhees was to my knowledge living out of the back of his car. Antonopoulos was effectively unemployable. This is why these individuals are making up a false narrative about expertise. This is why I am such a threat to them.

I will graduate with at least three more degrees this year.

on top of that one or two more postgraduate certificates and diplomas

next year I will graduate with another 8 to 10 degrees

CSW
Apr 30, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1619779653352700?thread_ts=1619779653.352700&cid=C5131HKFX

Education, and by this I mean a true education that teaches rational thought and the ability to logically analyse and respond to political scenarios is something that many people do not want you to have.

when you are able to rationally analyse and argue you will find that you start to see the world differently

Importantly, you start to be able to understand the reasoning behind many decisions that are made including the reasons behind the push for equality of outcomes and other aspects of post-modern society

When you do not embrace rationality and logic, you embrace a fluid scenario and set of anti-rules that allow others to manipulate how you act

The Rousseauean argument will be that you cannot be free in a system of order and rational thought, yet I will argue the converse

you cannot be free unless you can understand rational and logical thought patterns and learn to truly think for yourself

The knowledge of what is being sold and why can change opinion just as much is how you word things so it should be mandated

CSW
Apr 30, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1619783657372800?thread_ts=1619783657.372800&cid=C5131HKFX

Many people will attack you to bring you down. They do this through their fear. They are afraid. In doing this, they seek to stop you from doing what you are doing. The secret is not to be ashamed of your failures. They are a part of you. The failures in your life create you just as much as the successes and likely more. Failure is a form of lesson. The meaning of failure and whether it is valuable or derives waste is up to you. If you accept and learn from your failures, they are not failures.

You only truly fail when you finally give up. More importantly, if you don’t push yourself to failure, the truth of the matter is that you will never extend yourself. There is a process involved in becoming a top athlete. You push yourself to failure, and then you try again.

After 2005, I decided to see what I could do, and the only way to do this was to test myself to failure.

I took a Masters degree in statistics and, at first, I was having trouble.

Not because statistics is hard for me but in managing my time expectations.

This was my first time doing multiple degrees simultaneously

You will see that I had to withdraw from a couple of courses in my Charles Sturt degree at the time

What you will also see is that I was doing autumn session and the trimesters.

So, I was overlapping both sets of courseware at the same university while doing my Masters degree in statistics.

However, I was also simultaneously doing my Masters degree in law

In my first semester, I was only getting barely passing marks. You will see that I had a pass for my legal method. Although for US people they won't understand that the pass mark is actually 40% and that an A in a British university is 70%

I was also flying back and forth to the United States doing sound qualifications and other professional certifications

I intend to OWN all my failure as well as my triumphs

CSW
May 5, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1620195619052400?thread_ts=1620195619.052400&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2197