CSW. 310 Business & R&D
26 subscribers
30 photos
15 files
101 links
Download Telegram
I had around $20 million worth of my own money from working on software and other applications in the past.

My initial fight with the tax office cost me close to $3 million. I won, the tax office even needed to apologise which rarely happens but the end result of all the fights was the dissolution of my first marriage and a lot of money spent.

The thing that I don't want to do and that I wasn't doing is promoting bitcoin as a trading and speculating asset to gamble on.

The reason and purpose that are created bitcoin has nothing to do with that.

When we had cash flow problems in 2014 and I put a liquidator over one of the companies we had $1.5 million worth of money due.. That was over the next 90 to 120 days.

What people fail to see is that even when you own larger amounts of capital that you can end up with problems of liquidity.

I had around fifty staff earning an average of 124,000 dollars per year. On top of that, we had offices, computers, network systems and contracts and licensing agreements with banking software firms.

The thing people fail to note is that I paid all creditors and staff 100 cents on the dollar

in placing the company into administration I didn't need to do that. I could have made deals and I could have cancelled a number of contracts and got out of paying a lot of money.

CSW
Jan 29, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1611923673284000?thread_ts=1611923673.284000&cid=C5131HKFX

2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2002
Channel name was changed to «CSW. 310 Business»
1/2
What you going to soon find out is that most of what the other side have if not all is a combination of hearsay and character attacks. It is been difficult not responding on much of this for a period of over two years. But for instance, they talk about made up companies in the trust and said that they didn't exist because this is all they have.

This is the part that nobody wants you to look at.
Craig Wright R&D was the original name of the trust. Even though the trust was overseas, I registered these in Australia. As trustee I acted for it is an overseas entity. When they say how this didn't exist, or that the trust didn't exist, that is one little problem. The problem is that I registered it for an Australian business number.

Craig Wright R&D and the other entities as businesses representing the trusts have been registered since 29 February 2000. It was reformed under the trust business name for myself, remembering that a business called Craig Wright is not Craig Wright the person, on 10 February 2007. This is when I started creating bitcoin.

At that point I changed from DeMorgan to using myself as the trustee name. There are multiple other overseas trusts that were registered in Australia.

These all have records. These are not as difficult to check as people think either.

In January 2009 I formed a company called information defence in Australia.
In May 2009 I formed a company called integyrs in Australia.
In June 2009 with other people I formed a company called Greyfog in Australia. Others such as Cloudcroft all followed before Panopticrypt was formed in 2011.

All of these entities were held in trust. That is my shares were held in trust.

What people don't seem to understand is that the legal owner of an asset is the trustee and the trust maintains equitable ownership.

Tulip is simply the renamed version of the trust called Craig Wright R&D and DeMorgan at various times in history.

The overseas companies owned the Australian companies.

The Australian companies did the creation of intellectual property and any activity such as bitcoin mining. Many of the activities that I did I published widely and hence the intellectual property in those has been given freely to the world.

More importantly, every single bitcoin was created on the launch of bitcoin in January 2009. At that point I was controlling a company in Australia that owned all of the just under 21 million bitcoin denominated tokens that would ever exist.

Bitcoin was created using what is known in legal circles as a unilateral contract, this is a concept that even a junior law student would understand. See carbolic Smoke Ball.

In 2009, there was no millions in bitcoin as some people seem to think. There was around $2 million worth of running computers that was cost coupled with further sunk costs. The value of the bitcoin was nothing. It was not the value of computer hardware, it was only the value that people would be willing to pay for it and that was zero right up until 2010.

The interesting thing that people don't understand in an analysis of partnership, if there was one with Dave, he would owe me money. There isn't of course but the reality is partners have to share cost and profit.

The distribution was created on the launch of bitcoin. It's not the distributor, that is a process. The contract is the issue, I am simply put the issuer.

The distinction here is that bitcoin is issued initially without value and hence in the manner it was issued there isn't all the problems people speculate about. By creating bitcoin and launching it the way I did, all of the increase in value was created after the launch. More importantly, it took a lot of money, time and machines to be able to enable all of this.

CSW
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505437082800?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX
1/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2365
2/2
BTC is a copy of bitcoin that is passing off. Arguably, it is not the mined bitcoin that should be of concern. Rather it is the bitcoin that have not been distributed. As a system that is passing off, the unilateral contract does not lead to a scenario that locks in that value.

It was not a technical reason why I could not change bitcoin, this is where all of the cyberpunk idiots go wrong. The issue about bitcoin being set in stone requires much deeper thought than just being able to change code. The passing off activity and demonstration of code changes enacted by core has been useful. The copying of the database has created a scenario where it is demonstrably easy to show that a basic protocol change is more than feasible when were talking about government intervention. As I've noted multiple times, there are 32 nodes on BTC right now and only 3 to 4 of those that matter at any stage. The issuance of a court order would be simple and require activity from those invested in the system.

Ask Google or Microsoft. It doesn't even matter if you're talking about distributed code, when you have a code repository you have a location to issue changes against.

And oh, the criminals who call me criminal are very simple to judge, they want to maintain Egold and Liberty reserve electronic currency and have a system that will enable their pump and dump schemes, money-laundering and other criminal activity.

So, the simple reason you never hear about Integyrs, Information Defence, GreyFog or any of the other Australian entities is that there are clear uncontested records. It doesn't take hearsay. It doesn't change anything by attacking my email or folders. No matter how much you try and alter external records, the government records remain. In fact, many of these are off-line and some are paper. It is rather difficult for Greg and his cohorts to attack and alter paper remotely.

https://web.archive.org/web/20091213093902/http://www.integyrs.com/

Oh the Easter eggs people still have not figured out.

But you see, if I was to react as I did originally to every attack, I would not get any work done. I would not have time for study, I would not have time to come up with white papers and I certainly would not have any time to engage in the things are important.

when you don't link all of the information, a page can seem blank when in fact it's not

What you are missing is that there is no way to win by playing their game.

They have no interest in the system that I've created. It's not like Egold or Liberty reserve. Rather they want a system that allows them to get away with anarchy and crime, and unfortunately for them this is not what bitcoin happens to be. When Greg said bitcoin didn't work, it was more that it didn't work in the way that he wanted a digital currency or electronic cash system to exist.

CSW
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505437082800?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2365
Core Banking Project.pdf
2 MB
'Core Banking Project'
2/2

When we had cash flow problems in 2014 and I put a liquidator over one of the companies we had $1.5 million worth of money due.. That was over the next 90 to 120 days.

What people fail to see is that even when you own larger amounts of capital that you can end up with problems of liquidity.

I had around fifty staff earning an average of 124,000 dollars per year. On top of that, we had offices, computers, network systems and contracts and licensing agreements with banking software firms.

The thing people fail to note is that I paid all creditors and staff 100 cents on the dollar

in placing the company into administration I didn't need to do that. I could have made deals and I could have cancelled a number of contracts and got out of paying a lot of money.

CSW
Jan 29, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1611923673284000?thread_ts=1611923673.284000&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2461
"The company I set up in January 2009 called Information Defence aided in managing the Bitcoin network by running nodes. The company ran computers in several locations, which acted as the initial Bitcoin nodes from 2009 and until 2010. I never understood that bitcoin or any derivative could be worth the value at which it is now traded, to tell you the truth. Even now, billions of dollars remains a figure that is incomprehensible in many ways."

Bitcoin as a Security
By Craig Wright
25 Jul 2021
https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/bitcoin-as-a-security
Forwarded from 2008 History (@RamonQuesada 🌷)
"I am at a dinner with 5 Nobel prize winners, Chinese gov officials, several billionaires, heads of global companies.... etc."

https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1523101964000006

Fourth International Conference on Information Systems Security (ICISS 2008)
16-20 December 2008
JNTU, Hyderabad, India
http://seclab.cs.sunysb.edu/iciss08/
Forwarded from 2008 History (@RamonQuesada 🌷)
Forwarded from 2008 History (@RamonQuesada 🌷)
Forwarded from 2008 History (@RamonQuesada 🌷)
I am already in the process of starting a few new companies.

NChain isn't going away of course but I have been researching in different areas to extend everything.

bitcoin is the foundation that allows me to do many other areas that I've been interested in

one of these is food

I have a few patents that have already been filed on urban farming and technologies to do with changing how we produce and distribute within society

none of that would have worked if I didn't have a system that will allow for the tracking of each independent input without any fraud

further, I have been studying civil engineering and I've just completed my postgraduate certificate in battery engineering that will be part of a Masters in science in electrical engineering at Colorado

I know that battery engineering and food does not seem tto be connected to most people

It is

so, I don't want to waste money firing fucking rockeets into space that are not ready to do anything

I want to change the world

we can build more efficient systems that use far less water and far less chemicals in the production of vegetables allowing for systems that provide much more while being fresher and tastier

Right now the luxury items that are being withheld are good food

the poor get calories

they don't have heritage tomatoes

that will change

people may find this stupid

but personally, I think delivering food that peopple want to eat that is healthy it is fresh and that does not destroy the ecosystem without all tthe bullshit around climate change is important

the funny thing is one of the courses I have been doing as environmental science

Not the crap and environmentalists do but real microbiology based on analysis so that you can create systems based on hydroponics and more that deliver

CSW
Aug 21, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1629569297468300?thread_ts=1629569297.468300&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2916
Forwarded from 2009 01 08 - 361 Genesis block (@RamonQuesada 🌷)
"The company I set up in January 2009 called Information Defence aided in managing the Bitcoin network by running nodes. The company ran computers in several locations, which acted as the initial Bitcoin nodes from 2009 and until 2010. I never understood that bitcoin or any derivative could be worth the value at which it is now traded, to tell you the truth. Even now, billions of dollars remains a figure that is incomprehensible in many ways."

Bitcoin as a Security
By Craig Wright
25 Jul 2021
https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/bitcoin-as-a-security
I’ve stated this before and will say it again for anyone who is new.

Please don’t ask me for a job in this forum. If you believe that you can become an entrepreneur, then please do. However, you are not owed anything. The world doesn’t owe you were living; I don’t owe you a living, nobody owes you money, and if you can’t sell your idea, this is how capitalism works. If you can’t get your idea across, you can either spend your own time and money promoting it or do something else.

If you’re not able to get a job, look at your skill sets and look at what you’re aiming for. One of my first jobs was gutting chickens. I did that in the morning, I worked as an apprentice chef at night, and I put myself through school early on before moving on to other things.

Someone else having property or a company or money doesn’t give your right to it. The thing is, if you had a right to it, it wouldn’t exist.

There is a hierarchy in place in nChain and other things I’m involved with for a reason. Bureaucracy is necessary for any corporation. All aspects of how you believe the world can work without hierarchy and bureaucracy if you believe this is complete bullshit. Get over it. The reality is that humans are hierarchical social creatures. No matter what we do, we will always form social hierarchies no matter how much we have.

For businesses to work, it is necessary for people to be at different levels and have different roles, ending up in a hierarchical structure. Google ran around saying how they would have a flat structure. It failed. They are now more hierarchical than most places. The reason isn’t that the big bad corporate people came in and ruined it but is rather it is the only way that works.

Some people here go into the boundary of what I would call friends. The majority of the art, but that doesn’t mean I don’t like you. The definition of a friend and what people seem to think occurs online are two different things. Because I am friendly does not mean that suddenly we were best buddies and I will do anything for you.

I give a lot of my time to many people. The time I spend here educating is time that I could spend on other things. You may waste your time, I don’t know, but I rarely do. The time that I have is working, studying, and spending a good my family in that order.

So, please note that when you take my time, you’re not taking it from my work and not taking it from my study. So, as a consequence, please learn to be a little bit respectful. I’m not saying this to everyone here, and many of you are, but others need to learn limits.

I made over $20 an hour gutting chickens, late 80s.

Pay was good if you worked as part was by volume. The base was 3.45 per hour. So, kill yourself and earn more.

But cold, 3 Celsius

And, your hands always stank.

But, I could work 12 hours a week and fund uni and also pay the loan for my medical expenses

CSW
Sep 29, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1632897545271200?thread_ts=1632897545.271200&cid=C5131HKFX

https://t.me/CSW_Slack/3060
Bitcoin Or Gold: Did The Alleged Bitcoin Creator Just Settle Once And For All What Is More Valuable? |
Zero Hedge

"Craig Wright was speaking in a conference in Melbourne. He was giving a talk about Bitcoins and mining. He was then approached by a man by the name of Mark Ferrier and that was how they met. This was how the relationship was formed. They started talking. Craig Wright told Mark Ferrier that he wanted to start up a Bitcoin bank. They then started emailing. Mark Ferrier told him that he knew someone who could help him start up the bank. This was all done in early June 2013. Everything was done very quickly- most of it was done in one weekend. Craig Wright, with the help of Mark Ferrier, agreed to purchase banking software from Al Baraka. Mark Ferrier also convinced him to purchase gold ore"

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-12-14/bitcoin-or-gold-did-alleged-bitcoin-creator-just-settle-once-and-all-what-more-valua
"Following that, Craig clearly seems to have access to a lot of money then and sets up several businesses. Coin-Exch was supposed to be a Bitcoin banking system, and supposedly Craig met a guy called Mark Ferrier who(m) he purchased licensed Siemens software from, so he said. Mark Ferrier denies ever having met Craig. Craig used skype to come to an agreement with Mark such that he would deliver bankingsoftware and gold. He got the bankingsoftware but didn’t get the gold, which then led Craig to pull Mark into a courtcase over the Gold which he eventually stopped pursuing.".

Why I think dr Craig S. Wright may not be Satoshi and why I think he probably is.
Oudekaas
Oct 30,2021

https://medium.com/@oudekaas3/why-i-think-dr-craig-s-wright-may-not-be-satoshi-and-why-i-think-he-probably-is-c696e821099c
Channel name was changed to «CSW. 310 Business & R&D»