Telegram Chat
(about CSW post)
Please feel free to share your thoughts and comments about CSW posts.
https://t.me/CSW_SlackChat
(about CSW post)
Please feel free to share your thoughts and comments about CSW posts.
https://t.me/CSW_SlackChat
Telegram
CSW Chat
Chat about Slack
https://t.me/CSW_SlackChat
Craig Wright - Slack Channel
https://t.me/CSW_Slack
https://ramonquesada.com/english/telegrams-channels/
CSW Constitutional Observer (feb 2026)
https://t.me/+tmuGa7MOgEFiOTE0
https://t.me/CSW_SlackChat
Craig Wright - Slack Channel
https://t.me/CSW_Slack
https://ramonquesada.com/english/telegrams-channels/
CSW Constitutional Observer (feb 2026)
https://t.me/+tmuGa7MOgEFiOTE0
The overseas companies owned the Australian companies.
The Australian companies did the creation of intellectual property and any activity such as bitcoin mining. Many of the activities that I did I published widely and hence the intellectual property in those has been given freely to the world.
More importantly, every single bitcoin was created on the launch of bitcoin in January 2009. At that point I was controlling a company in Australia that owned all of the just under 21 million bitcoin denominated tokens that would ever exist.
CSW
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505718083600?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX
The Australian companies did the creation of intellectual property and any activity such as bitcoin mining. Many of the activities that I did I published widely and hence the intellectual property in those has been given freely to the world.
More importantly, every single bitcoin was created on the launch of bitcoin in January 2009. At that point I was controlling a company in Australia that owned all of the just under 21 million bitcoin denominated tokens that would ever exist.
CSW
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505718083600?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX
I had around $20 million worth of my own money from working on software and other applications in the past.
My initial fight with the tax office cost me close to $3 million. I won, the tax office even needed to apologise which rarely happens but the end result of all the fights was the dissolution of my first marriage and a lot of money spent.
The thing that I don't want to do and that I wasn't doing is promoting bitcoin as a trading and speculating asset to gamble on.
The reason and purpose that are created bitcoin has nothing to do with that.
When we had cash flow problems in 2014 and I put a liquidator over one of the companies we had $1.5 million worth of money due.. That was over the next 90 to 120 days.
What people fail to see is that even when you own larger amounts of capital that you can end up with problems of liquidity.
I had around fifty staff earning an average of 124,000 dollars per year. On top of that, we had offices, computers, network systems and contracts and licensing agreements with banking software firms.
The thing people fail to note is that I paid all creditors and staff 100 cents on the dollar
in placing the company into administration I didn't need to do that. I could have made deals and I could have cancelled a number of contracts and got out of paying a lot of money.
CSW
Jan 29, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1611923673284000?thread_ts=1611923673.284000&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2002
My initial fight with the tax office cost me close to $3 million. I won, the tax office even needed to apologise which rarely happens but the end result of all the fights was the dissolution of my first marriage and a lot of money spent.
The thing that I don't want to do and that I wasn't doing is promoting bitcoin as a trading and speculating asset to gamble on.
The reason and purpose that are created bitcoin has nothing to do with that.
When we had cash flow problems in 2014 and I put a liquidator over one of the companies we had $1.5 million worth of money due.. That was over the next 90 to 120 days.
What people fail to see is that even when you own larger amounts of capital that you can end up with problems of liquidity.
I had around fifty staff earning an average of 124,000 dollars per year. On top of that, we had offices, computers, network systems and contracts and licensing agreements with banking software firms.
The thing people fail to note is that I paid all creditors and staff 100 cents on the dollar
in placing the company into administration I didn't need to do that. I could have made deals and I could have cancelled a number of contracts and got out of paying a lot of money.
CSW
Jan 29, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1611923673284000?thread_ts=1611923673.284000&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2002
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
2/2
This is what permission and permissionless are truly about. If you think about it, you will see that every time a small group controlling a base protocol is allowed to update that protocol they can set the direction of a project. In doing so, they could…
This is what permission and permissionless are truly about. If you think about it, you will see that every time a small group controlling a base protocol is allowed to update that protocol they can set the direction of a project. In doing so, they could…
1/2
What you going to soon find out is that most of what the other side have if not all is a combination of hearsay and character attacks. It is been difficult not responding on much of this for a period of over two years. But for instance, they talk about made up companies in the trust and said that they didn't exist because this is all they have.
This is the part that nobody wants you to look at.
Craig Wright R&D was the original name of the trust. Even though the trust was overseas, I registered these in Australia. As trustee I acted for it is an overseas entity. When they say how this didn't exist, or that the trust didn't exist, that is one little problem. The problem is that I registered it for an Australian business number.
Craig Wright R&D and the other entities as businesses representing the trusts have been registered since 29 February 2000. It was reformed under the trust business name for myself, remembering that a business called Craig Wright is not Craig Wright the person, on 10 February 2007. This is when I started creating bitcoin.
At that point I changed from DeMorgan to using myself as the trustee name. There are multiple other overseas trusts that were registered in Australia.
These all have records. These are not as difficult to check as people think either.
In January 2009 I formed a company called information defence in Australia.
In May 2009 I formed a company called integyrs in Australia.
In June 2009 with other people I formed a company called Greyfog in Australia. Others such as Cloudcroft all followed before Panopticrypt was formed in 2011.
All of these entities were held in trust. That is my shares were held in trust.
What people don't seem to understand is that the legal owner of an asset is the trustee and the trust maintains equitable ownership.
Tulip is simply the renamed version of the trust called Craig Wright R&D and DeMorgan at various times in history.
The overseas companies owned the Australian companies.
The Australian companies did the creation of intellectual property and any activity such as bitcoin mining. Many of the activities that I did I published widely and hence the intellectual property in those has been given freely to the world.
More importantly, every single bitcoin was created on the launch of bitcoin in January 2009. At that point I was controlling a company in Australia that owned all of the just under 21 million bitcoin denominated tokens that would ever exist.
Bitcoin was created using what is known in legal circles as a unilateral contract, this is a concept that even a junior law student would understand. See carbolic Smoke Ball.
In 2009, there was no millions in bitcoin as some people seem to think. There was around $2 million worth of running computers that was cost coupled with further sunk costs. The value of the bitcoin was nothing. It was not the value of computer hardware, it was only the value that people would be willing to pay for it and that was zero right up until 2010.
The interesting thing that people don't understand in an analysis of partnership, if there was one with Dave, he would owe me money. There isn't of course but the reality is partners have to share cost and profit.
The distribution was created on the launch of bitcoin. It's not the distributor, that is a process. The contract is the issue, I am simply put the issuer.
The distinction here is that bitcoin is issued initially without value and hence in the manner it was issued there isn't all the problems people speculate about. By creating bitcoin and launching it the way I did, all of the increase in value was created after the launch. More importantly, it took a lot of money, time and machines to be able to enable all of this.
CSW
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505437082800?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX
1/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2365
What you going to soon find out is that most of what the other side have if not all is a combination of hearsay and character attacks. It is been difficult not responding on much of this for a period of over two years. But for instance, they talk about made up companies in the trust and said that they didn't exist because this is all they have.
This is the part that nobody wants you to look at.
Craig Wright R&D was the original name of the trust. Even though the trust was overseas, I registered these in Australia. As trustee I acted for it is an overseas entity. When they say how this didn't exist, or that the trust didn't exist, that is one little problem. The problem is that I registered it for an Australian business number.
Craig Wright R&D and the other entities as businesses representing the trusts have been registered since 29 February 2000. It was reformed under the trust business name for myself, remembering that a business called Craig Wright is not Craig Wright the person, on 10 February 2007. This is when I started creating bitcoin.
At that point I changed from DeMorgan to using myself as the trustee name. There are multiple other overseas trusts that were registered in Australia.
These all have records. These are not as difficult to check as people think either.
In January 2009 I formed a company called information defence in Australia.
In May 2009 I formed a company called integyrs in Australia.
In June 2009 with other people I formed a company called Greyfog in Australia. Others such as Cloudcroft all followed before Panopticrypt was formed in 2011.
All of these entities were held in trust. That is my shares were held in trust.
What people don't seem to understand is that the legal owner of an asset is the trustee and the trust maintains equitable ownership.
Tulip is simply the renamed version of the trust called Craig Wright R&D and DeMorgan at various times in history.
The overseas companies owned the Australian companies.
The Australian companies did the creation of intellectual property and any activity such as bitcoin mining. Many of the activities that I did I published widely and hence the intellectual property in those has been given freely to the world.
More importantly, every single bitcoin was created on the launch of bitcoin in January 2009. At that point I was controlling a company in Australia that owned all of the just under 21 million bitcoin denominated tokens that would ever exist.
Bitcoin was created using what is known in legal circles as a unilateral contract, this is a concept that even a junior law student would understand. See carbolic Smoke Ball.
In 2009, there was no millions in bitcoin as some people seem to think. There was around $2 million worth of running computers that was cost coupled with further sunk costs. The value of the bitcoin was nothing. It was not the value of computer hardware, it was only the value that people would be willing to pay for it and that was zero right up until 2010.
The interesting thing that people don't understand in an analysis of partnership, if there was one with Dave, he would owe me money. There isn't of course but the reality is partners have to share cost and profit.
The distribution was created on the launch of bitcoin. It's not the distributor, that is a process. The contract is the issue, I am simply put the issuer.
The distinction here is that bitcoin is issued initially without value and hence in the manner it was issued there isn't all the problems people speculate about. By creating bitcoin and launching it the way I did, all of the increase in value was created after the launch. More importantly, it took a lot of money, time and machines to be able to enable all of this.
CSW
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505437082800?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX
1/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2365
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505437082800?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2365
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505437082800?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2365
2/2
BTC is a copy of bitcoin that is passing off. Arguably, it is not the mined bitcoin that should be of concern. Rather it is the bitcoin that have not been distributed. As a system that is passing off, the unilateral contract does not lead to a scenario that locks in that value.
It was not a technical reason why I could not change bitcoin, this is where all of the cyberpunk idiots go wrong. The issue about bitcoin being set in stone requires much deeper thought than just being able to change code. The passing off activity and demonstration of code changes enacted by core has been useful. The copying of the database has created a scenario where it is demonstrably easy to show that a basic protocol change is more than feasible when were talking about government intervention. As I've noted multiple times, there are 32 nodes on BTC right now and only 3 to 4 of those that matter at any stage. The issuance of a court order would be simple and require activity from those invested in the system.
Ask Google or Microsoft. It doesn't even matter if you're talking about distributed code, when you have a code repository you have a location to issue changes against.
And oh, the criminals who call me criminal are very simple to judge, they want to maintain Egold and Liberty reserve electronic currency and have a system that will enable their pump and dump schemes, money-laundering and other criminal activity.
So, the simple reason you never hear about Integyrs, Information Defence, GreyFog or any of the other Australian entities is that there are clear uncontested records. It doesn't take hearsay. It doesn't change anything by attacking my email or folders. No matter how much you try and alter external records, the government records remain. In fact, many of these are off-line and some are paper. It is rather difficult for Greg and his cohorts to attack and alter paper remotely.
https://web.archive.org/web/20091213093902/http://www.integyrs.com/
Oh the Easter eggs people still have not figured out.
But you see, if I was to react as I did originally to every attack, I would not get any work done. I would not have time for study, I would not have time to come up with white papers and I certainly would not have any time to engage in the things are important.
when you don't link all of the information, a page can seem blank when in fact it's not
What you are missing is that there is no way to win by playing their game.
They have no interest in the system that I've created. It's not like Egold or Liberty reserve. Rather they want a system that allows them to get away with anarchy and crime, and unfortunately for them this is not what bitcoin happens to be. When Greg said bitcoin didn't work, it was more that it didn't work in the way that he wanted a digital currency or electronic cash system to exist.
CSW
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505437082800?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2365
BTC is a copy of bitcoin that is passing off. Arguably, it is not the mined bitcoin that should be of concern. Rather it is the bitcoin that have not been distributed. As a system that is passing off, the unilateral contract does not lead to a scenario that locks in that value.
It was not a technical reason why I could not change bitcoin, this is where all of the cyberpunk idiots go wrong. The issue about bitcoin being set in stone requires much deeper thought than just being able to change code. The passing off activity and demonstration of code changes enacted by core has been useful. The copying of the database has created a scenario where it is demonstrably easy to show that a basic protocol change is more than feasible when were talking about government intervention. As I've noted multiple times, there are 32 nodes on BTC right now and only 3 to 4 of those that matter at any stage. The issuance of a court order would be simple and require activity from those invested in the system.
Ask Google or Microsoft. It doesn't even matter if you're talking about distributed code, when you have a code repository you have a location to issue changes against.
And oh, the criminals who call me criminal are very simple to judge, they want to maintain Egold and Liberty reserve electronic currency and have a system that will enable their pump and dump schemes, money-laundering and other criminal activity.
So, the simple reason you never hear about Integyrs, Information Defence, GreyFog or any of the other Australian entities is that there are clear uncontested records. It doesn't take hearsay. It doesn't change anything by attacking my email or folders. No matter how much you try and alter external records, the government records remain. In fact, many of these are off-line and some are paper. It is rather difficult for Greg and his cohorts to attack and alter paper remotely.
https://web.archive.org/web/20091213093902/http://www.integyrs.com/
Oh the Easter eggs people still have not figured out.
But you see, if I was to react as I did originally to every attack, I would not get any work done. I would not have time for study, I would not have time to come up with white papers and I certainly would not have any time to engage in the things are important.
when you don't link all of the information, a page can seem blank when in fact it's not
What you are missing is that there is no way to win by playing their game.
They have no interest in the system that I've created. It's not like Egold or Liberty reserve. Rather they want a system that allows them to get away with anarchy and crime, and unfortunately for them this is not what bitcoin happens to be. When Greg said bitcoin didn't work, it was more that it didn't work in the way that he wanted a digital currency or electronic cash system to exist.
CSW
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505437082800?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2365
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505437082800?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2365
May 26, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1590505437082800?thread_ts=1590505437.082800&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2365
Core Banking Project.pdf
2 MB
'Core Banking Project'
2/2
When we had cash flow problems in 2014 and I put a liquidator over one of the companies we had $1.5 million worth of money due.. That was over the next 90 to 120 days.
What people fail to see is that even when you own larger amounts of capital that you can end up with problems of liquidity.
I had around fifty staff earning an average of 124,000 dollars per year. On top of that, we had offices, computers, network systems and contracts and licensing agreements with banking software firms.
The thing people fail to note is that I paid all creditors and staff 100 cents on the dollar
in placing the company into administration I didn't need to do that. I could have made deals and I could have cancelled a number of contracts and got out of paying a lot of money.
CSW
Jan 29, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1611923673284000?thread_ts=1611923673.284000&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2461
When we had cash flow problems in 2014 and I put a liquidator over one of the companies we had $1.5 million worth of money due.. That was over the next 90 to 120 days.
What people fail to see is that even when you own larger amounts of capital that you can end up with problems of liquidity.
I had around fifty staff earning an average of 124,000 dollars per year. On top of that, we had offices, computers, network systems and contracts and licensing agreements with banking software firms.
The thing people fail to note is that I paid all creditors and staff 100 cents on the dollar
in placing the company into administration I didn't need to do that. I could have made deals and I could have cancelled a number of contracts and got out of paying a lot of money.
CSW
Jan 29, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1611923673284000?thread_ts=1611923673.284000&cid=C5131HKFX
2/2
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2461
Telegram
CSW - Slack Channel
CSW
Jan 29, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1611923673284000?thread_ts=1611923673.284000&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2461
Jan 29, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1611923673284000?thread_ts=1611923673.284000&cid=C5131HKFX
https://t.me/CSW_Slack/2461
"The company I set up in January 2009 called Information Defence aided in managing the Bitcoin network by running nodes. The company ran computers in several locations, which acted as the initial Bitcoin nodes from 2009 and until 2010. I never understood that bitcoin or any derivative could be worth the value at which it is now traded, to tell you the truth. Even now, billions of dollars remains a figure that is incomprehensible in many ways."
Bitcoin as a Security
By Craig Wright
25 Jul 2021
https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/bitcoin-as-a-security
Bitcoin as a Security
By Craig Wright
25 Jul 2021
https://craigwright.net/blog/bitcoin-blockchain-tech/bitcoin-as-a-security
Business
https://t.me/CSW_Business
Centrebet, Lasseter’s Online casino. https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUh8gq0AhGjF23LzQ
DeMorgan https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEW9hmi85dZVZB_GIQ
Panopticrypt https://t.me/joinchat/TOYcE7h_6MmTFNww
W&K Info Defense Research LLC https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAFJ732aSjZqfOuqSXA
Andrew Sommer Reg. Australia - https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAFYnjLMT5ryJWlsV1g
nTrust nCrypt https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEVaX1Svb5ELSMHQiQ
CSW Patent – nChain
https://t.me/CSW_Patent
nChain Holdings Limited (chronology) https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEjJgin1cClCv1Q_7w
Kensei nChain
https://t.me/joinchat/ZrwdF9GRM9kyZTVk
TAAL & Squire Mining LTD https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAFBaY1T97tMJYhhNtw
Stefan Matthews
https://t.me/StefanMatthews
https://t.me/CSW_Business
Centrebet, Lasseter’s Online casino. https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEUh8gq0AhGjF23LzQ
DeMorgan https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEW9hmi85dZVZB_GIQ
Panopticrypt https://t.me/joinchat/TOYcE7h_6MmTFNww
W&K Info Defense Research LLC https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAFJ732aSjZqfOuqSXA
Andrew Sommer Reg. Australia - https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAFYnjLMT5ryJWlsV1g
nTrust nCrypt https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEVaX1Svb5ELSMHQiQ
CSW Patent – nChain
https://t.me/CSW_Patent
nChain Holdings Limited (chronology) https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAEjJgin1cClCv1Q_7w
Kensei nChain
https://t.me/joinchat/ZrwdF9GRM9kyZTVk
TAAL & Squire Mining LTD https://t.me/joinchat/AAAAAFBaY1T97tMJYhhNtw
Stefan Matthews
https://t.me/StefanMatthews
Telegram
CSW. 310 Business & R&D
CSW Business & R&D research and development
https://t.me/CSW_Business
@CSW_Academic
@CSW_Articles
@CSW_interviews
@CSW_interviewsVideos
@CSW_Legal
@CSW_Slack
https://t.me/CSW_Business
@CSW_Academic
@CSW_Articles
@CSW_interviews
@CSW_interviewsVideos
@CSW_Legal
@CSW_Slack
Forwarded from 2008 History (@RamonQuesada 🌷)
"I am at a dinner with 5 Nobel prize winners, Chinese gov officials, several billionaires, heads of global companies.... etc."
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1523101964000006
Fourth International Conference on Information Systems Security (ICISS 2008)
16-20 December 2008
JNTU, Hyderabad, India
http://seclab.cs.sunysb.edu/iciss08/
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1523101964000006
Fourth International Conference on Information Systems Security (ICISS 2008)
16-20 December 2008
JNTU, Hyderabad, India
http://seclab.cs.sunysb.edu/iciss08/
ATO Investigation into Wright's company C01N Pty Ltd
ATO's reasons for decision for C01N Pty Ltd for the period 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013 (2016/3/11)
original: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/547/7/kleiman-v-wright/
archive: https://archive.ph/TAQP7
local copy:
Document
gov.uscourts.flsd_.521536.547.7.pdf
ATO's reasons for decision for C01N Pty Ltd for the period 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2013 (2016/3/11)
original: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6309656/547/7/kleiman-v-wright/
archive: https://archive.ph/TAQP7
local copy:
Document
gov.uscourts.flsd_.521536.547.7.pdf
CourtListener
#547, Att. #7 in Kleiman v. Wright (S.D. Fla., 9:18-cv-80176) – CourtListener.com
RESPONSE in Opposition re 490 Defendant's MOTION in Limine filed by Ira Kleiman, W&K Info Defense Research, LLC. Replies due by 6/8/2020. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7…