"Philosophy Class 9: Aeschylus - Agamemnon, Choephoroe and Eumenides (Dr. Craig S. Wright)"
https://youtu.be/PmeE2h47i6M

"Alleged Inventors of Bitcoin Uncovered"
https://youtu.be/mzIIyQDQjuA

"Interview with Craig Wright | Satoshi's Vision Conference, Tokyo 2018"
https://youtu.be/PICaO7Z3wZU

"Craig Wright (18 Oct. 2018)" en YouTube
https://youtu.be/Yr3aiicJq8I

"SF+LON 2: Craig Wright Interview with Ryan X. Charles" en YouTube
https://youtu.be/eVivnmVkoHc

"Craig Wright Interview - Bitcoin & Moral Reasons - Part 3 of 3"
https://youtu.be/86hEbNtEFtk

Bitcoin creator Craig Wright: "I'm suing Crypto Exchanges Coinbase and Kraken , Crypto Exchanges are scans".

https://usetmx.com/details?cId=12456

How Bitcoin and IPv6 will change the Internet | Unbounded - Dr Craig S Wright
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ynhxPCSBDRc
Bitcoin SV - 11/May/2022
--
by @BSVVideosBot / @BSVBots

"How Bitcoin and IPv6 will change the Internet | Unbounded - Dr Craig S Wright" en YouTube
https://youtu.be/ynhxPCSBDRc

"Philosophy - Additional Content - Revolutionary America the Federalist Number 10"
https://youtu.be/3qSs_4hHfmo

Jon Matonis and Craig Wright - Shinseiki Evangerion - Arnhem 2017 -June 30th

The Future of Bitcoin

30/06/2017 BitCoin SUPERVIDEO

1h23

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dgqtcu0zo-k&t=12s



30/06/2017 BitCoin SUPERVIDEO

1h21

Craig Wright - Future of Bitcoin talk, Arnhem Netherlands 2017 Bitcoin.TV

Conference 2017- Arnhem

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JdJexAYjrDw&t=1007s




https://gist.githubusercontent.com/harding/b7067d2943706e2e3d3f7aab539a67c5/raw/6de6a0a6f5a840ffe69fdeeb71b243f5fa166ad5/craig-wright-2017-06-30.md


[This is a transcript of Craig Wright's presentation at the Future of

Bitcoin conference on 30 June 2017. This transcription should not be seen as an endorsement of Mr. Wright, a person who previously

fraudulently claimed to be the creator of Bitcoin, among many other fraudulent claims. Note that ellipses in the text ("...") represent the speaker trailing off or switching topics mid-sentence, rather than the omission of any text by the transcriber. All comments and additions from the transcriber appear between square brackets. Q&A not currently included, but may be added later.] Alright. So, first of all, what's this about. Anyone know their manga? We have the genesis of a new century. So, that's what that's about. This is genesis of a new century. Now current problem: we have seven (which is really four) sort of issues: 1. We have this little tiny scaling issue. Which is nothing. See that whole screen? That whole screen is payments. See that little pixel there? That's Bitcoin. That's what we are right now. We are right down there---that little tiny pixel is Bitcoin. We are nothing. We like to think we're something right at the moment. We are not. If we want to be something, we need to scale and radically. Not offchain. Not moving some of the security into sidechains and splitting the model. We need to, right now, today, start scaling. In two thousand and nine, we had more scalability than we do right now. Problem. We have this idea; we have things that are being said; we have people changing the story; we have a lot of 1984 doublespeak. We have people telling us what we should believe. People lying to us about what shou... what everyone wants to think [sic]. And we're going to change that narrative. Not because we want, well, an idea that someone has of an idea. But because we want scientific truth; we want evidence; we want facts; we want more. What we need: we need the unseen. Everyone know, our famous little economist/journalist from France: "the seen and the unseen". Bastiat, who.... People considered him not an economist. In France, the Philisophs [?] said he was not an economist because he says things that are so obvious. The seen and the unseen. We are seeing Bitcoin; we are not seeing the entire system. The entire system is everything we are competing with---which will crush us. We have other things that we're trying to build into the system that will crush us. When we split Bitcoin into millions and millions of pegged systems. When we add inflation. When we create these sidechains that, by the way, are patented and are controlled and happened to be owned and happened to be managed and monitored. Then we give away the security model. If 100% of everything mines Bitcoin and controls Bitcoin, that's a security model that is hard; that no government can take over; that no company can take over; no one takes over. Bitcoin can scale. Right now. [Slide showing tweet allegedly from Peter Todd: "How could a capacity upgrade do that? There's no upper limit to demand, and the Bitcoin protocol doesn't scale.] What is it. Well we can't do that. There's no limit on demand. Good! I don't a limit on demand. I want every person on this globe using not altcoins not whatever else; I want them using Bitcoin. I don't some bullshit argument about "oh, people will use it and it will be bad". Very simple; very easy: good! When every single person on this globe pays for their cup of coffee---pays for their whatever they want---every day using one single central currency (and I'll say central; one distrib

uted central currency) that is not controlled, that is hard money. That's what Bitcoin is about: hard central controlled, no one can change, money. The problem is central banks inflate. Who here actually knows what the genesis block message was about? Who's read the Times page? [Audience reply inaudible.] What happened in the page? What was being discussed? [Audience inaudible.] They were considering buying the toxic assets. The government was saying, "the naughty banks who we've just given billions to refuse to change their business model and risk their money again, and if they don't do it, we're going to buy them and nationalize them." So, great, we're going to incentivize banks further to make crappier loans. What a great thing. [Points to alleged Peter Todd quote.] No upper limit to scale. Good! [New slide.] Economic game theoretic systems. This is what Bitcoin is about. It is economic. Timing models; one vote per CPU. This is a republic; it is not a demagoguery. It is not where people get to yell and scream and lie. And very soon we're going to change that narrative. Very soon people are going to discover that when you start lying and when you troll, there are consequences. So. What is a node? A node is not every little tiny Raspberry Pi running everywhere. The machines running Bitcoin in 2009 were bigger than every single Raspberry Pi. The machines Hal [Finney] ran. The machines Bear [Ray Dillinger] ran. Everyone else who joined this thing at that point had bigger machines running these damn things [sic]. And now we have this idea that we can't run it on a little tiny insy winsy insignificant machine. Who cares? What is more important: you having a copy of the block chain, or you having money that no one can manipulate. Honestly, start thinking. These whole utopian ideas of how you spend money are wrong. Economic fundamentals matter. Lightning doesn't work because nobody spends that way. I don't go over to [store name] and ask them to take a bag of carrots and give money. That's the bi-directional models. They don't work. I don't go down the road in some big co-op, and go, "well, I've just made a box of widgets; how 'bout you give money for it and whatever else." Barter never really existed. Ever. What we have now is a system that changes everything. Our new generation, our new genesis, is the creation of the first ever hard money. The first money that allows for freedom. Gold was never hard because we never had it. When Nixon took America off the gold exchange standard, which wasn't a gold standard, do you know how much of that gold was actually there? [Inaudible audience responses.] About five percent. So they didn't actually have the gold they were backing their currency with. [Side, SPV and merchants] So SPV and merchants. Merchants give a [inaudible]. When you go and you pay a merchant they care that they get the payment. They're the ones who want zero-conf; they're the ones who know what they can and can't risk. When you pay a merchant, you don't care that your payment has or hasn't been accepted straight away. You care that you've handed the payment over and you've walked out the store with the goods, and you've got a receipt. More than that, who cares? You're not going to want to sit there and validate that the merchant actually got paid. Really, you don't care. So what we need: we need to move these silly ideas that we need split Bitcoin into little bits so that everyone can own their little bit of Bitcoin. "Everyone wants segwit" - 1984 segwit. Everyone does not want segwit. Everyone is being cowed. I'm sure everyone has seen the fun media about myself and my family. Well, here's the thing for you: I do have those degrees. That so-called PGP key to Mr. Maxwell, I would say, because the Australian tax office approached Blockstream and asked them about my affairs and dealings in May 2015. The people involved in the tax office have been arrested. So, my taxes issues are zero. But there are some issues for other people about to come, because when you lie and when you say things that aren't true, there are con

sequences. And we're going to make sure that these consequences are going to hit these people hard. [Side, SegWit is NOT scale. Line chart allegedly comparing "Bitcoin vs SegWit"] Segwit is not scale. That [points to one line] is what get with a block size increase; that [points to other line] is what we get with segwit. If you have a 4 meg block; if you have a 16 meg block; you multiply it by 4. That is not scale. What you do to scale is increase the throughput, and you get more for a 4 meg block than you do any time that you have this split system that needs to be run that you can't really delete if you're a merchant or a financial organization. Saying "oh, well, you can keep it," where the hell is the actual benefit of deleting that you can't delete? Each transaction requires more bandwidth. It's very simple: it takes more. The answers you've been given about how terrible all this is: run multi-threaded systems; stop arguing that it needs to be put on Raspberry Pis so that they can lie to you and tell that it needs to be moved off to other systems. It doesn't. One of the things we, yes, we patent---I'm not afraid to say that. Unlike Greg [Maxwell?] and whatever else, we will choose what we do with our technology. That's not bad. I created things, I get to choose. My choice. I will put some out free. We will put some out otherwise. Our choice. But, at the end of the day, scale needs to happen---and it needs to happen now. And it's not quadratic due to these other problems they're saying. [New slide, looks like screencap of GitHub showing a some lines of code in Bitcoin Core.] Here's a thing no one's talking about: this quadratic scaling issue. It's added to Bitcoin. It is added. Follow the codebase. It is easy to fix. I know several, [such as] Bitcrust, Bitcoin Unlimited, and our team independently picked this out and fixed it. Our team did it in about three hours. That's sure scalability. Doing multithreading about putting things off to [unknown term; sounds like "Xeon fi cards"]... any idea how many sigops we can achieve now? Anyone? Five hundred thousand per second. That's scale. And yes, that's a $20,000 machine. Quite frankly, I don't care about Raspberry Pis. If you have been in Bitcoin since 2009 and you can't afford a $20,000 node to help this network, piss off. [Audience applause.] And I will say that one again, if you will not do this; if you will not help this network; and if you will not take this thing that has given you financial sovereignty, you financial freedom, you financial independence, and help other people by spending a little bit of money on a decent network, fuck off! [More audience applause.] [New slide, Scale is quadratic due to code flaws. Shows a diff with two added lines, one removed line in mempool management.] That's it: O-2 [sic; slide says O(n^2)]. Poor code. Shit code. That's why we need competition. That's why, not just Core, anyone should be release their own and compete fairly. If you make a better solution and you put it out to market, you compete fairly. Through competition, because people use your product. Not because you're cowed into... DDoS attacks or anything like that. Not because of all of that. Bitcoin Unlimited found the flaw as well. Some of these thing that Unlimited have been doing [are] very innovated. [New slide, Moore's Law is our friend] At the end of the day, Moore's Law [is] our friend. The smallest transistor---well, I'm probably being superseded already, but I've got a paper coming out on this, and the editors picked out a mistake because I said a 2 nanometer transistor and it turns out there's now a 1 nanometer transistor. When all this happened, people were arguing that because of quantum tunneling, this is impossible. "At six nanometers, it will never be done." Guess what? It's been done. So stop this, "oh, we can't do it" and "oh, everything's bad" idea. The reality is we need to start being optimistic, positive, and build. Allow competition. Allow free access to code. Allow people to actually start competing. No building little walled bloody gardens. [New