This article, the ‘Ecclesiastical Deed Poll’… maybe of interest to others here..!
I came across this article, while researching some additional aspects the ‘Cestui Que Vie Trust’ for ‘Legal v Lawful’ purposes…
It is very powerful and could be used to increase the voracity of our claim as… ‘living men & women’ to the re-conveyancing of ourselves back to ‘land & soil jurisdiction’…
An ‘Ecclesiastical Deed Poll’ is a valid form of Deed Poll, whereby a true living ‘man or woman’ first expresses, affirms & conveys, certain rights to another party, who is then lawfully bound, upon proof of receipt…
The word “Poll” comes from the latin ‘pollex’ - meaning ‘thumb’…
An ‘Ecclesiastical Deed Poll’… owes its name both as a formal & valid form of Deed, defined by ‘Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum’ (also known as the ‘Living Body of Divine Canon’) it is the right of a man or woman to evoke their Divine Rights as a Divine Immortal Spirit to proclaim those rights bestowed to them upon being born.
Unlike Papal Bulls and other forms of religious deeds claiming property conveyance, an ‘Ecclesiastical Deed Poll’… is the highest form of deed & agreement and circumscribed sacred instrument because upon it’s seal in blood it represents a command by the ‘Divine Creator’ to a servant of the Roman Cult, its agents or Venetian/Khazarian slavers to honour the most fundamental elements of trust law, property law & contract law.
An ‘Ecclesiastical Deed Poll’ is permitted to be issued when a man or woman seeks to be free of the Roman slavery system by serving the ‘Registrar of Vital Statistics’ also known in many jurisdictions as ‘Births, Deaths & Marriages’.
Only a True Man or Woman may issue an ‘Ecclesiastical Deed Poll’. By definition, an inferior Roman Person has no authority to issue an ‘Ecclesiastical Deed Poll’.
(Excerpt).
Important short read… with an accompanying short podcast. On How to provide Proof of the ‘Living Man/woman’… ⬇️
https://www.standfortruth.co.uk/ecclesiastical-deed-poll-instructions
I came across this article, while researching some additional aspects the ‘Cestui Que Vie Trust’ for ‘Legal v Lawful’ purposes…
It is very powerful and could be used to increase the voracity of our claim as… ‘living men & women’ to the re-conveyancing of ourselves back to ‘land & soil jurisdiction’…
An ‘Ecclesiastical Deed Poll’ is a valid form of Deed Poll, whereby a true living ‘man or woman’ first expresses, affirms & conveys, certain rights to another party, who is then lawfully bound, upon proof of receipt…
The word “Poll” comes from the latin ‘pollex’ - meaning ‘thumb’…
An ‘Ecclesiastical Deed Poll’… owes its name both as a formal & valid form of Deed, defined by ‘Astrum Iuris Divini Canonum’ (also known as the ‘Living Body of Divine Canon’) it is the right of a man or woman to evoke their Divine Rights as a Divine Immortal Spirit to proclaim those rights bestowed to them upon being born.
Unlike Papal Bulls and other forms of religious deeds claiming property conveyance, an ‘Ecclesiastical Deed Poll’… is the highest form of deed & agreement and circumscribed sacred instrument because upon it’s seal in blood it represents a command by the ‘Divine Creator’ to a servant of the Roman Cult, its agents or Venetian/Khazarian slavers to honour the most fundamental elements of trust law, property law & contract law.
An ‘Ecclesiastical Deed Poll’ is permitted to be issued when a man or woman seeks to be free of the Roman slavery system by serving the ‘Registrar of Vital Statistics’ also known in many jurisdictions as ‘Births, Deaths & Marriages’.
Only a True Man or Woman may issue an ‘Ecclesiastical Deed Poll’. By definition, an inferior Roman Person has no authority to issue an ‘Ecclesiastical Deed Poll’.
(Excerpt).
Important short read… with an accompanying short podcast. On How to provide Proof of the ‘Living Man/woman’… ⬇️
https://www.standfortruth.co.uk/ecclesiastical-deed-poll-instructions
❤3👍1
‘For those yet to come’…
A poem of how ‘OUR FREEDOMS’ have & still are being eradicated… a millimetre at a time..!
Very very short 2 mins…
Please share far & wide..!
https://youtu.be/l0Jf6Sw1qA8
A poem of how ‘OUR FREEDOMS’ have & still are being eradicated… a millimetre at a time..!
Very very short 2 mins…
Please share far & wide..!
https://youtu.be/l0Jf6Sw1qA8
YouTube
Youtube and Facebook both banned me uploading at the same time...
Youtube ban ends 29th Jan, FB 90days...
❤1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
All… ‘Utility’ Bills… Gas, Electricity, Water, etc etc etc… are prepaid by YOUR… ‘Cestui Vie Que Trust’…
Which was set up at the Registration of YOUR ‘Birth’ via YOUR… ‘Birth Certificate’… which in turn, is a securitised bond that’s traded on the stock exchange…
Depending on your age YOUR ‘Cestui Que Vie Trust’… could be worth millions, even billions 💷💶💵💴💰🪙
YOU are the ‘Beneficiary’ of that Trust… presumed… ‘Dead, lost at Sea’… until you, correct & rebut ALL of their presumptions…
You are a ‘living man / woman’… NOT a ‘Legal Fictional Person’… ALL CAPS NAME… as displayed on YOUR…
‘Birth Certificate’…
‘Driving License’…
‘Passport’… and any other ‘Legal Documents’…
Do YOUR Due Diligence and RESEARCH… 🧐
All credits to Robert of…
‘The Observation Deck’ channel on YouTube…
You will find a ‘WEALTH’ of information contained in his TOD video archives…
SHORT 15 min VIDEO..!
Download & save for future reference…
Please share far & wide… so that ‘Truth may prevail’..!
https://youtube.com/@ObservationDeck
Which was set up at the Registration of YOUR ‘Birth’ via YOUR… ‘Birth Certificate’… which in turn, is a securitised bond that’s traded on the stock exchange…
Depending on your age YOUR ‘Cestui Que Vie Trust’… could be worth millions, even billions 💷💶💵💴💰🪙
YOU are the ‘Beneficiary’ of that Trust… presumed… ‘Dead, lost at Sea’… until you, correct & rebut ALL of their presumptions…
You are a ‘living man / woman’… NOT a ‘Legal Fictional Person’… ALL CAPS NAME… as displayed on YOUR…
‘Birth Certificate’…
‘Driving License’…
‘Passport’… and any other ‘Legal Documents’…
Do YOUR Due Diligence and RESEARCH… 🧐
All credits to Robert of…
‘The Observation Deck’ channel on YouTube…
You will find a ‘WEALTH’ of information contained in his TOD video archives…
SHORT 15 min VIDEO..!
Download & save for future reference…
Please share far & wide… so that ‘Truth may prevail’..!
https://youtube.com/@ObservationDeck
👍3👏1
This is an important guide, how to fill out & present an ‘Affidavit’…
Including some additional information re: the authenticity & authority of ‘Magna Carta 1215’.
Also, a very important link, to an interview conducted with the late ‘John Hurst’ R.I.P. of the ‘Magna Carta Society’ Hurst, a retired police constable of the Old School.
By that I mean that when he joined in 1978, constables were taught the law of The Constitution and Sir Robert Peel’s “Principles of policing” which were based on the common law.
It contains very interesting, important & informative information… with additional links should they be required…
Two pages. Very short read. Please keep a copy for further reference.
Here is the authority for ‘Article 61’ -‘Magna Carta 1215’… "Diffidatio: diffidation
noun
Formal relinquishment or renunciation of faith, allegiance, or amity: solemn defiance of an enemy; declaration of hostilities: as, to send a letter of diffidation.
“ A metrical chronicle (4) records the threat to depose the King, (John) unless he fully amended the law and furnished undoubted guarantees for a lasting peace.
On 5th May, the barons went through the ceremony of diffidatio, or formal renunciation of allegiance,(1) a recognised feudal right, and not involving treason if justified by events and properly intimated to the overlord.(2)
(4) Chronica de Mailros, sub anno 1215. 1. Blackstone, Great Charter, p. xiii, citing Annals of Dunstable (p. 43), says they were absolved at Wallingford by a Canon of Durham. 2. Cf. Adams, Origin, 181 n.; 306, 312; cf. also infra under c. 61…”.
Note the words “ Properly intimated to the overlord…”.
That means a sworn affidavit signed in front of a Crown Official and served on The Queen.
The complicated alternatives made up by the likes of the Common Law Court and 38 pages of incoherent ramblings by David Robinson on the subject are just wrong.
If you want the protection that ‘Article 61’ gives you the presently accepted form of an affidavit is contained in the ‘Civil Procedure Rules’...
There is nothing here that is inconsistent with the ‘English common law’...
A copy of your affidavit should be served on the last known address of The Queen by Royal Mail Registered Post.
If there is no satisfactory response after 10 days another affidavit stating that you have had no satisfactory response should be sent.
If there is no response after 3 days the matter is closed. Keep your proofs of posting and original copies of the documents.
https://daddydragon.co.uk/2020/09/28/john-hurst-a-defense-at-common-law-the-real-common-law-in-a-real-court
Including some additional information re: the authenticity & authority of ‘Magna Carta 1215’.
Also, a very important link, to an interview conducted with the late ‘John Hurst’ R.I.P. of the ‘Magna Carta Society’ Hurst, a retired police constable of the Old School.
By that I mean that when he joined in 1978, constables were taught the law of The Constitution and Sir Robert Peel’s “Principles of policing” which were based on the common law.
It contains very interesting, important & informative information… with additional links should they be required…
Two pages. Very short read. Please keep a copy for further reference.
Here is the authority for ‘Article 61’ -‘Magna Carta 1215’… "Diffidatio: diffidation
noun
Formal relinquishment or renunciation of faith, allegiance, or amity: solemn defiance of an enemy; declaration of hostilities: as, to send a letter of diffidation.
“ A metrical chronicle (4) records the threat to depose the King, (John) unless he fully amended the law and furnished undoubted guarantees for a lasting peace.
On 5th May, the barons went through the ceremony of diffidatio, or formal renunciation of allegiance,(1) a recognised feudal right, and not involving treason if justified by events and properly intimated to the overlord.(2)
(4) Chronica de Mailros, sub anno 1215. 1. Blackstone, Great Charter, p. xiii, citing Annals of Dunstable (p. 43), says they were absolved at Wallingford by a Canon of Durham. 2. Cf. Adams, Origin, 181 n.; 306, 312; cf. also infra under c. 61…”.
Note the words “ Properly intimated to the overlord…”.
That means a sworn affidavit signed in front of a Crown Official and served on The Queen.
The complicated alternatives made up by the likes of the Common Law Court and 38 pages of incoherent ramblings by David Robinson on the subject are just wrong.
If you want the protection that ‘Article 61’ gives you the presently accepted form of an affidavit is contained in the ‘Civil Procedure Rules’...
There is nothing here that is inconsistent with the ‘English common law’...
A copy of your affidavit should be served on the last known address of The Queen by Royal Mail Registered Post.
If there is no satisfactory response after 10 days another affidavit stating that you have had no satisfactory response should be sent.
If there is no response after 3 days the matter is closed. Keep your proofs of posting and original copies of the documents.
https://daddydragon.co.uk/2020/09/28/john-hurst-a-defense-at-common-law-the-real-common-law-in-a-real-court
👏1
Art.61Affidavit1.docx
15.4 KB
How to properly prepare & present an… ‘AFFIDAVIT’… according to the Rules of ‘Civil Procedure’… 🇬🇧🇦🇺🇳🇿🇺🇸
👍1
‘Civil Procedure Rules’… 🇬🇧
https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part32/pd_part32
https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil/rules/part32/pd_part32
👍1
John Bingley of ‘The British Constitution Group’… presentation… July 12th 2014….
This is a… ‘Brilliant’… talk about the origins of the British 🇬🇧 Commonwealth’s 🇦🇺 🇳🇿 & American 🇺🇸 Constitutions…
The ‘Magna Carta 1215’ - ‘Declaration of Rights’ - ‘Bill of Rights’… that give a real in depth review of the history & events that shaped & enshrined these crucial lawful documents… to remain in perpetuity… forever…!!!
An absolute treasure trove of great information contained within…!
Well worth the watch to sharpen up OUR comprehension of OUR shared HISTORICAL HERITAGE’S… & LAW’s (Land, Air, Water)…🇬🇧🇦🇺 🇳🇿🇺🇸
Please share far & wide…
https://youtu.be/GwfgtZ-SC-4
This is a… ‘Brilliant’… talk about the origins of the British 🇬🇧 Commonwealth’s 🇦🇺 🇳🇿 & American 🇺🇸 Constitutions…
The ‘Magna Carta 1215’ - ‘Declaration of Rights’ - ‘Bill of Rights’… that give a real in depth review of the history & events that shaped & enshrined these crucial lawful documents… to remain in perpetuity… forever…!!!
An absolute treasure trove of great information contained within…!
Well worth the watch to sharpen up OUR comprehension of OUR shared HISTORICAL HERITAGE’S… & LAW’s (Land, Air, Water)…🇬🇧🇦🇺 🇳🇿🇺🇸
Please share far & wide…
https://youtu.be/GwfgtZ-SC-4
YouTube
The British Constitution
John Bingley explains the British Constitution at a British Constitution Group conference.
🔥3👍2
In the 2017 “Brexit” Judgement the UK ‘Supreme Court’ upheld the Authority of the ‘Bill of Rights’ in these words:
Para. 44. In the early 17th century Case of Proclamations (1610) 12 Co Rep 74, Sir Edward Coke CJ said that:
“the King by his proclamation or other ways cannot change any part of the common law, or statute law, or the customs of the realm”.
Although this statement may have been controversial at the time, it had become firmly established by the end of that century.
In England & Wales, the ‘Bill of Rights 1688’ confirmed that “the pretended power of suspending of laws or the execution of laws by regall authority without consent of Parlyament is illegall” and that:
“the pretended power of dispensing with laws or the execution of laws by regall authoritie as it hath beene assumed and exercised of late is illegall”..!
Para. 44. In the early 17th century Case of Proclamations (1610) 12 Co Rep 74, Sir Edward Coke CJ said that:
“the King by his proclamation or other ways cannot change any part of the common law, or statute law, or the customs of the realm”.
Although this statement may have been controversial at the time, it had become firmly established by the end of that century.
In England & Wales, the ‘Bill of Rights 1688’ confirmed that “the pretended power of suspending of laws or the execution of laws by regall authority without consent of Parlyament is illegall” and that:
“the pretended power of dispensing with laws or the execution of laws by regall authoritie as it hath beene assumed and exercised of late is illegall”..!
👍2
More information from ‘Anna Von Reitz’… regarding OUR ALL CAPS names that are trade marks... & how to claim them back…
One page 📄 document… very short read…
http://annavonreitz.com/beingstupidpart32.pdf
One page 📄 document… very short read…
http://annavonreitz.com/beingstupidpart32.pdf
🙏1
ALL FIXED PENALTY ‘NOTICES’ are ILLEGAL..!
Without a conviction in a properly convened court, any fine or forfeiture issued prior to conviction is illegal and void… Ref: ‘Bill of Rights’… 🇬🇧 🇦🇺 🇳🇿 🇺🇸
Without a conviction in a properly convened court, any fine or forfeiture issued prior to conviction is illegal and void… Ref: ‘Bill of Rights’… 🇬🇧 🇦🇺 🇳🇿 🇺🇸
👍2
PCN's Illegal.pdf
171.1 KB
‘PARKING CHARGE NOTICES’… are ILLEGAL..!
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼‘ VICTORY’👏🏼👏🏼👏🏼over scum bag bailiffs!
The ‘Police’ finally remember that they are ‘Police Constable’s & NOT ‘Officers’… & stand under their ‘common law’ - ‘OATH’… to observe & maintain the ‘KING’S PEACE’… by upholding… the ‘common law’ of “cause no loss, harm or injury to another ’living’ man or woman or their offspring nor ‘TRESPASS’ on their rights , liberties, freedoms & property”…!!!
A polite ‘NOTICE’ to all ‘POLICE CONSTABULARY’S
Your colleagues are showing you the way and what real policing looks like & how to regain the trust & respect of the wider general public… that YOU’VE ALL LOST over the years of Tyrannical Policing policies…
Many men & women who become ‘Police Constables’ initially join for, what they believe are honourable intentions… however, those honourable intentions are soon forgotten as pressure from within, is brought to bare… to go along with a different set of ideals & a way of working and follow corporate policies…
A very short video clip… please share far & wide..!
The ‘Police’ finally remember that they are ‘Police Constable’s & NOT ‘Officers’… & stand under their ‘common law’ - ‘OATH’… to observe & maintain the ‘KING’S PEACE’… by upholding… the ‘common law’ of “cause no loss, harm or injury to another ’living’ man or woman or their offspring nor ‘TRESPASS’ on their rights , liberties, freedoms & property”…!!!
A polite ‘NOTICE’ to all ‘POLICE CONSTABULARY’S
Your colleagues are showing you the way and what real policing looks like & how to regain the trust & respect of the wider general public… that YOU’VE ALL LOST over the years of Tyrannical Policing policies…
Many men & women who become ‘Police Constables’ initially join for, what they believe are honourable intentions… however, those honourable intentions are soon forgotten as pressure from within, is brought to bare… to go along with a different set of ideals & a way of working and follow corporate policies…
A very short video clip… please share far & wide..!
👏6❤3👎1
Validation of the ‘MAGNA CARTA 1215’ AD…
Whereas; Winston Churchill said;
“Here is a law which is above the King & Parliament, and which even He & They must not, and may not, legally break.
And in the event they or anyone else were to try to abrogate it, such attempt at abrogation, shall have no force, nor effect, and can be safely ignored, with no legal ill effect.
In addition, in the event of successful attempts at abrogation of such liberties, customs, or rights, the King (John Lackland 1199-1216) has commanded and do hereby compel any and all subjects to swear oath to join the barons to assail the properties and persons and families of those [. . . .] who had successfully completed such abrogation, including but not limited to that of the individual Members of Parliament who had voted in favour of any such successful attempts at abrogation.
This reaffirmation of a supreme law and its expression in a general charter is the great work of ‘Magna Carta’; and this alone justifies the respect in which men have held it.”
[CHURCHILL - A History of the English Speaking Peoples] (1956).
All men & women who do NOT take their ‘Oaths’ of allegiance to the ‘Committee of Barons’ are classed as… ‘OUTLAWS’..!
Whereas; Winston Churchill said;
“Here is a law which is above the King & Parliament, and which even He & They must not, and may not, legally break.
And in the event they or anyone else were to try to abrogate it, such attempt at abrogation, shall have no force, nor effect, and can be safely ignored, with no legal ill effect.
In addition, in the event of successful attempts at abrogation of such liberties, customs, or rights, the King (John Lackland 1199-1216) has commanded and do hereby compel any and all subjects to swear oath to join the barons to assail the properties and persons and families of those [. . . .] who had successfully completed such abrogation, including but not limited to that of the individual Members of Parliament who had voted in favour of any such successful attempts at abrogation.
This reaffirmation of a supreme law and its expression in a general charter is the great work of ‘Magna Carta’; and this alone justifies the respect in which men have held it.”
[CHURCHILL - A History of the English Speaking Peoples] (1956).
All men & women who do NOT take their ‘Oaths’ of allegiance to the ‘Committee of Barons’ are classed as… ‘OUTLAWS’..!
👍2❤1
‘CERTIFICATE of MAILING’..!
This ‘Certificate of Mailing’ can be used as additional proof of ‘Notice’s sent via ‘Registered Mail’…
A very useful Instrument… to dispel any lies, that ‘Notice’s were never received…
The ‘Notice’ is to be signed by a ‘Witness’…
A copy sent with your ‘Notice’ and the original is to be retained by you…
This ‘Certificate of Mailing’ can be used as additional proof of ‘Notice’s sent via ‘Registered Mail’…
A very useful Instrument… to dispel any lies, that ‘Notice’s were never received…
The ‘Notice’ is to be signed by a ‘Witness’…
A copy sent with your ‘Notice’ and the original is to be retained by you…
1. Whereas; R v Donovan (1934) 2 KB 498 at 507, (1934) All ER Rep 207 at 210.
In delivering the judgement of the Court of Criminal Appeal. Swift J, said:
“If an act is unlawful in the sense of being itself a criminal act, it is plain that it cannot be rendered lawful, because the person to whose detriment it is done, consents to it. No person can license another to commit a crime”.
Making the point that driving without government documents, license’s etc…
Cannot be ‘of it’s self criminal’… as the GOVERNMENT licenses these ‘Acts’ and therefore cannot be criminal;
And i: am; without evidence; knowledge or understanding that any evidence to the contrary exists.
In delivering the judgement of the Court of Criminal Appeal. Swift J, said:
“If an act is unlawful in the sense of being itself a criminal act, it is plain that it cannot be rendered lawful, because the person to whose detriment it is done, consents to it. No person can license another to commit a crime”.
Making the point that driving without government documents, license’s etc…
Cannot be ‘of it’s self criminal’… as the GOVERNMENT licenses these ‘Acts’ and therefore cannot be criminal;
And i: am; without evidence; knowledge or understanding that any evidence to the contrary exists.
❤1👍1
‘Word of the Day’…
‘Mens rea’… in criminal law is concerned with the state of mind of the defendant…
Most true crimes will require proof of ‘mens rea’.
Where ‘mens rea’ is not required the offence is one of strict liability.
There are three main levels of ‘mens rea’: intention, recklessness and negligence.
‘The Mental Element of a Crime’…
In addition to meeting all of the ‘actus reus’…
elements of an offence, a defendant must be shown to have a guilty mind at the same time that they commit the actus reus.
This guilty mind, or mental element, is known as ‘mens rea’.
For the vast majority of offences, mens rea will be satisfied if the defendant can be shown to have intended their actions, or can be considered to have been reckless as to whether a consequence would occur or circumstances would exist, following their conduct…
However, in certain circumstances a defendant will satisfy ‘mens rea’… if they are considered to have acted negligently and, for certain offences, known as offences of strict liability, no ‘mens rea’ at all is required.
There are therefore four broad areas of ‘mens rea’ that will be considered:
1 Intention
2 Recklessness
3 Negligence
4 Strict Liability
https://www.lawteacher.net/lectures/criminal-law/committing-an-offence/mens-rea
‘Mens rea’… in criminal law is concerned with the state of mind of the defendant…
Most true crimes will require proof of ‘mens rea’.
Where ‘mens rea’ is not required the offence is one of strict liability.
There are three main levels of ‘mens rea’: intention, recklessness and negligence.
‘The Mental Element of a Crime’…
In addition to meeting all of the ‘actus reus’…
elements of an offence, a defendant must be shown to have a guilty mind at the same time that they commit the actus reus.
This guilty mind, or mental element, is known as ‘mens rea’.
For the vast majority of offences, mens rea will be satisfied if the defendant can be shown to have intended their actions, or can be considered to have been reckless as to whether a consequence would occur or circumstances would exist, following their conduct…
However, in certain circumstances a defendant will satisfy ‘mens rea’… if they are considered to have acted negligently and, for certain offences, known as offences of strict liability, no ‘mens rea’ at all is required.
There are therefore four broad areas of ‘mens rea’ that will be considered:
1 Intention
2 Recklessness
3 Negligence
4 Strict Liability
https://www.lawteacher.net/lectures/criminal-law/committing-an-offence/mens-rea
www.e-lawresources.co.uk
Strict liability
Strict liability crimes are crimes which require no proof of mens rea in relation to one or more aspects of the actus reus. Strict liability offences are primarily regulatory offences aimed at businesses in relation to health and safety.
👍2
General Support of Trial by Jury…
“The Trial by Jury ever has been, and I trust ever will be, looked upon as the glory of the English law…”
“It is the most transcendent privilege which any subject can enjoy or wish for, that they cannot be affected in their property, liberty or person, but by the unanimous consent of twelve of there neighbours & equals…”
Book 3, Blackstone’s Analysis of the Laws of England, p. 379
“The Trial by Jury ever has been, and I trust ever will be, looked upon as the glory of the English law…”
“It is the most transcendent privilege which any subject can enjoy or wish for, that they cannot be affected in their property, liberty or person, but by the unanimous consent of twelve of there neighbours & equals…”
Book 3, Blackstone’s Analysis of the Laws of England, p. 379
The Great Charter (‘Magna Carta 1215’) is Real Common Law…
“It is agreed by all our historians… that the ‘Great Charter’ of ‘King John’ was, for the most part, compiled from the ‘ancient customs’ of the realm, or the laws of ‘Edward the Confessor’; by which they mean the ‘old common law’, which was established under our Saxon princes…”
Blackstone’s Introduction to the (Great) Charters; Blackstone’s Law Tracts, p. 289
“It (‘Magna Carta 1215’) was for the most part declaratory of the principal grounds of the fundamental laws of England…”
“They (‘Magna Carta 1215’ & ‘Carta de Foresta 1217’)… were, for the most part, but declarations of the
‘ancient common laws’… of England, to the observation & keeping whereof; the king (the government) was bound & sworn…”
Sir Edward Coke (Chief Justice), Preface to 2 Coke’s Institutes.
“It is agreed by all our historians… that the ‘Great Charter’ of ‘King John’ was, for the most part, compiled from the ‘ancient customs’ of the realm, or the laws of ‘Edward the Confessor’; by which they mean the ‘old common law’, which was established under our Saxon princes…”
Blackstone’s Introduction to the (Great) Charters; Blackstone’s Law Tracts, p. 289
“It (‘Magna Carta 1215’) was for the most part declaratory of the principal grounds of the fundamental laws of England…”
“They (‘Magna Carta 1215’ & ‘Carta de Foresta 1217’)… were, for the most part, but declarations of the
‘ancient common laws’… of England, to the observation & keeping whereof; the king (the government) was bound & sworn…”
Sir Edward Coke (Chief Justice), Preface to 2 Coke’s Institutes.
Step-by-Step Process to enter into Lawful Rebellion.pdf
1.8 MB
‘Step by Step Process How to Enter… Lawful Rebellion’..!
All men & women in the UK 🇬🇧 & Commonwealth 🇦🇺🇳🇿🇿🇦🇨🇦 who do NOT take their ‘Oaths’ of allegiance to the ‘Committee of Barons’ are classed as… ‘OUTLAWS’..!
Swearing YOUR ‘Oath’ of allegiance, places YOU under the umbrella protection of ‘Article 61’ - ’Magna Carta 1215’… giving the man or woman… ‘legal & lawful’ impunity, to disrupt, harass & distress the Crown 👑 & it’s offices..!
All public buildings & offices under Crown Jurisdiction, such as Council Offices, Police Stations, Magistrate’s Courts buildings… etc etc etc.. are all fair game for occupation… until such time, all grievance’s of ‘Treason’ are redressed… by the ‘Crown’… 👑
All men & women in the UK 🇬🇧 & Commonwealth 🇦🇺🇳🇿🇿🇦🇨🇦 who do NOT take their ‘Oaths’ of allegiance to the ‘Committee of Barons’ are classed as… ‘OUTLAWS’..!
Swearing YOUR ‘Oath’ of allegiance, places YOU under the umbrella protection of ‘Article 61’ - ’Magna Carta 1215’… giving the man or woman… ‘legal & lawful’ impunity, to disrupt, harass & distress the Crown 👑 & it’s offices..!
All public buildings & offices under Crown Jurisdiction, such as Council Offices, Police Stations, Magistrate’s Courts buildings… etc etc etc.. are all fair game for occupation… until such time, all grievance’s of ‘Treason’ are redressed… by the ‘Crown’… 👑