Chicago Manual of Styles 17th Edition.pdf
30.7 MB
Chicago Manual of Style 17th Edition
A very useful book to have when crafting any documentation and making sure you’re grammatically correct..
A very useful book to have when crafting any documentation and making sure you’re grammatically correct..
👍3
Principles of Tort law.pdf
2.3 MB
‘The Principals of Tort Law’ ~ A very useful book 📖 to have in your library… 📚
🙏1
Cruden v. Neale : Annexure GA-01.pdf
58.5 KB
‘Every man is independent of all laws’… except those prescribed by God / nature..!
He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent."
Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E. 70
He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent."
Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E. 70
👍1🙏1
The pure Maxims of Laws of Commerce…
The eternal & unchanging principles are;
1. A WORKMAN IS WORTHY OF HIS HIRE. Exodus 20:15; Lev. 19:13; Mat. 10:10; Luke 10″7; II Tim. 2:6. Legal maxim: “It is against equity for freemen not to have the free disposal of their own property.”
2. ALL ARE EQUAL UNDER THE LAW. “Equality before the law” Exodus 21:23-25; Lev. 24: 17-21; Deut. 1;17, 19:21; Mat. 22:36-40; Luke 10:17; Col. 3:25. “No one is above The Law”.
3. IN COMMERCE TRUTH IS SOVEREIGN. (Exodus 20:16; Ps. 117:2; John 8:32; II Cor. 13:8 ). Truth Rules, Your Word is your Bond.
4 TRUTH IS EXPRESSED BY FORM OF AN AFFIDAVIT. (Lev. 5:4- 5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev. 19:11-13: Num. 30:2; Mat. 5:33; James 5: 12)
5. AN UNREBUTTED AFFIDAVIT STANDS AS TRUTH IN COMMERCE. (12 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13-15;) Affidavit is the highest form of truth. Legal Maxim: “He who does not deny, admits.”
6. AN UNREBUTTED AFFIDAVIT BECOMES THE JUDGMENT IN COMMERCE. (Heb. 6:16 17 wink emoticon. Nihil Dicit
7. IN COMMERCE FOR ANY MATTER TO BE RESOLVED MUST BE EXPRESSED. (Heb. 4:16; Phil. 4:6; Eph. 6:19-21). Legal Maxim: “He who fails to assert his rights has none.)
8. HE WHO LEAVES THE BATTLEFIELD FIRST LOSES BY DEFAULT. Mat. 10:22; Legal Maxim: “He who does not repel a wrong when he can, occasions it”.
9. SACRIFICE IS THE MEASURE OF CREDIBILITY (NO WILLINGNESS TO SACRIFICE = NO LIABILITY, RESPONSIBILITY, AUTHORITY OR MEASURE OF CONVICTION). (Acts 7, life/death of Stephen), Legal Maxim: “He who bears the burden ought also to derive the benefit”.
10. SATISFACTION OF A LIEN (Gen. 2-3; Mat. 4;.).
In commerce a lien or claim can be satisfied by rebutting the affidavit, with a counter affidavit, point by point.
It is stipulated that In case of non-resolution, doctrine of estoppel will automatically prevail.
If non-payment is encountered, the Sheriff will convene a common law jury, based on the Seventh Amendment, concerning a dispute involving a claim of more than £ / $ 20.00.
The only other way to satisfy a lien is to pay it.
The eternal & unchanging principles are;
1. A WORKMAN IS WORTHY OF HIS HIRE. Exodus 20:15; Lev. 19:13; Mat. 10:10; Luke 10″7; II Tim. 2:6. Legal maxim: “It is against equity for freemen not to have the free disposal of their own property.”
2. ALL ARE EQUAL UNDER THE LAW. “Equality before the law” Exodus 21:23-25; Lev. 24: 17-21; Deut. 1;17, 19:21; Mat. 22:36-40; Luke 10:17; Col. 3:25. “No one is above The Law”.
3. IN COMMERCE TRUTH IS SOVEREIGN. (Exodus 20:16; Ps. 117:2; John 8:32; II Cor. 13:8 ). Truth Rules, Your Word is your Bond.
4 TRUTH IS EXPRESSED BY FORM OF AN AFFIDAVIT. (Lev. 5:4- 5; Lev. 6:3-5; Lev. 19:11-13: Num. 30:2; Mat. 5:33; James 5: 12)
5. AN UNREBUTTED AFFIDAVIT STANDS AS TRUTH IN COMMERCE. (12 Pet. 1:25; Heb. 6:13-15;) Affidavit is the highest form of truth. Legal Maxim: “He who does not deny, admits.”
6. AN UNREBUTTED AFFIDAVIT BECOMES THE JUDGMENT IN COMMERCE. (Heb. 6:16 17 wink emoticon. Nihil Dicit
7. IN COMMERCE FOR ANY MATTER TO BE RESOLVED MUST BE EXPRESSED. (Heb. 4:16; Phil. 4:6; Eph. 6:19-21). Legal Maxim: “He who fails to assert his rights has none.)
8. HE WHO LEAVES THE BATTLEFIELD FIRST LOSES BY DEFAULT. Mat. 10:22; Legal Maxim: “He who does not repel a wrong when he can, occasions it”.
9. SACRIFICE IS THE MEASURE OF CREDIBILITY (NO WILLINGNESS TO SACRIFICE = NO LIABILITY, RESPONSIBILITY, AUTHORITY OR MEASURE OF CONVICTION). (Acts 7, life/death of Stephen), Legal Maxim: “He who bears the burden ought also to derive the benefit”.
10. SATISFACTION OF A LIEN (Gen. 2-3; Mat. 4;.).
In commerce a lien or claim can be satisfied by rebutting the affidavit, with a counter affidavit, point by point.
It is stipulated that In case of non-resolution, doctrine of estoppel will automatically prevail.
If non-payment is encountered, the Sheriff will convene a common law jury, based on the Seventh Amendment, concerning a dispute involving a claim of more than £ / $ 20.00.
The only other way to satisfy a lien is to pay it.
👍3🙏1
In the case of Stewart v. Wyoming Ranche Co., 128 U.S. 383, 388 (1888), 🇺🇸 to wit: Legal Maxim: ‘Aliud est tacere, aliud celare’, ~ a suppression of the truth may amount to a suggestion of falsehood.
And if, with intent to deceive, either party to a contract of sale conceals or suppresses a material fact, which he is in good faith bound to disclose, this is evidence of and equivalent to a false representation, because the concealment or suppression is, in effect, a representation that what is disclosed is the whole truth.
The gist of the action is fraudulently producing a false impression upon the mind of the other party; and, if this result is accomplished, it is unimportant whether the means of accomplishing it are words or acts of the defendant, or his concealment or suppression of material facts not equally within the knowledge or reach of the plaintiff.
NOTE: This can be used against those in positions of trust who deliberately mislead the public as the safety of vaccines 💉
And if, with intent to deceive, either party to a contract of sale conceals or suppresses a material fact, which he is in good faith bound to disclose, this is evidence of and equivalent to a false representation, because the concealment or suppression is, in effect, a representation that what is disclosed is the whole truth.
The gist of the action is fraudulently producing a false impression upon the mind of the other party; and, if this result is accomplished, it is unimportant whether the means of accomplishing it are words or acts of the defendant, or his concealment or suppression of material facts not equally within the knowledge or reach of the plaintiff.
NOTE: This can be used against those in positions of trust who deliberately mislead the public as the safety of vaccines 💉
👍1🙏1
Jensen v. Snow, 163 A. 784, 786 Sup. Jud. Ct.Maine 1933), to wit: “No principle of law is better settled than that which requires the agent in all dealings concerning the subject-matter of his agency to act with utmost good faith and loyalty and disclose all facts within his knowledge which bear materially upon his principal’s interests.
The rule that withholding information, when good faith and honest dealing require that it shall be given, is as culpable as misrepresentation as to facts concerning which good faith and honest dealing require the truth to be spoken is fully applicable to the relation of principal and agent.
As has been said, it is fraud to deal with a party in ignorance and leave him so.
It is not necessary that the party sought to be charged should have created the false impression nor intended it.
It is sufficient that he knows it and takes advantage of it.”
Cummings Manufacturing Co. v. Smith, 113 Me. 347, 351, 93 A. 968; Barrett v. St. Ry. Co., 110 Me. 24, 29, 85 A. 306; Prentiss v. Russ, 16 Me. 30; Lapish v. Wells, 6 Me. (6 Greenl.) 175.
“Concealment with intent to defraud of facts which one is duty-bound in honesty to disclose is of the same legal effect and significance as affirmative misrepresentation of fact.”
Nasaba Corp. v. Harfred Realty Corp., 39 N.E.2d 243, 295 (Ct.App.N.Y. 1942). “Where a party is entitled to inquire of another, who is required to respond, respondent is guilty of fraud if he conceals any material fact to the inquirer’s hurt and respondent’s advantage. Sovereign Camp W.O.W. v. Boykin, 181 So. 741, 742 (Sup.Ct.Miss. 1938).
The rule that withholding information, when good faith and honest dealing require that it shall be given, is as culpable as misrepresentation as to facts concerning which good faith and honest dealing require the truth to be spoken is fully applicable to the relation of principal and agent.
As has been said, it is fraud to deal with a party in ignorance and leave him so.
It is not necessary that the party sought to be charged should have created the false impression nor intended it.
It is sufficient that he knows it and takes advantage of it.”
Cummings Manufacturing Co. v. Smith, 113 Me. 347, 351, 93 A. 968; Barrett v. St. Ry. Co., 110 Me. 24, 29, 85 A. 306; Prentiss v. Russ, 16 Me. 30; Lapish v. Wells, 6 Me. (6 Greenl.) 175.
“Concealment with intent to defraud of facts which one is duty-bound in honesty to disclose is of the same legal effect and significance as affirmative misrepresentation of fact.”
Nasaba Corp. v. Harfred Realty Corp., 39 N.E.2d 243, 295 (Ct.App.N.Y. 1942). “Where a party is entitled to inquire of another, who is required to respond, respondent is guilty of fraud if he conceals any material fact to the inquirer’s hurt and respondent’s advantage. Sovereign Camp W.O.W. v. Boykin, 181 So. 741, 742 (Sup.Ct.Miss. 1938).
🙏1
‘AFFIDAVIT of TRUTH in COMMERCE & Claim for Damages’..!
HOW… it’s DONE..!
Common Law is above the foreign, bankrupt, private de facto’s ‘STATUTORY COMMERCIAL CODE’, written by those who are not lawfully allowed to hold offices of trust…
The Crown Temple B.A.R. Attorners, lawyers, solicitor’s… are purveyors of fraud & piracy, & whatever they do is null & void on it’s face…
“US Supreme Court held that; state officials acting by ‘colour of law’ may be held personally liable for the ‘injuries or torts’ they cause & that official or sovereign immunity may not be asserted”…; Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 US 232 (1974), 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974).
“When a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he / she comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, & he / she is in that case, stripped of their official or representative character & is subjected in his / her person to the consequences of his / her individual conduct”..!
“The State has no power to impart to him / her any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States.” ~ Warnock v Pecos County, Texas, 116 F. 3d 776 – No.96-50869 Summary Calendar. July 3, 1997.
“The de facto is foreclosed from parity with the tangible”…
Their ‘STATUTES & CODES’ are only the colour of law, they are NOT LAW..!
They can only control, that which they create…
They are a CORPORATION, NOT a government…!
They, (government) as TRUSTEES are all in breach of their fiduciary duty & many are guilty of HIGH TREASON..!
These public servants have taken over, so that we are their servants…
This is what happens when the general population is hoodwinked into thinking they’re supposed to be acting as U.S. citizens…
It’s the exact opposite of the truth…!!!
It’s imperative to correct that tragic, mortal error mentally and in your political status…
Many years ago, when Dick Marple was a young man, he and many others quit & resigned from the State Police because they learned they weren’t law enforcement at all, in that they were ’CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS’ acting as ‘RE-VENUE’ generators for the Bankruptcy by fleecing living people as if they were DEAD entities / the legal fiction PERSONS /JOHN H. DOE’s under Colour of Law…
That is a serious crime & hangable /punishable by death..!
https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/affidavit-of-truth-in-commerce-and-claim-for-damages
HOW… it’s DONE..!
Common Law is above the foreign, bankrupt, private de facto’s ‘STATUTORY COMMERCIAL CODE’, written by those who are not lawfully allowed to hold offices of trust…
The Crown Temple B.A.R. Attorners, lawyers, solicitor’s… are purveyors of fraud & piracy, & whatever they do is null & void on it’s face…
“US Supreme Court held that; state officials acting by ‘colour of law’ may be held personally liable for the ‘injuries or torts’ they cause & that official or sovereign immunity may not be asserted”…; Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 US 232 (1974), 94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974).
“When a state officer acts under a state law in a manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he / she comes into conflict with the superior authority of that Constitution, & he / she is in that case, stripped of their official or representative character & is subjected in his / her person to the consequences of his / her individual conduct”..!
“The State has no power to impart to him / her any immunity from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States.” ~ Warnock v Pecos County, Texas, 116 F. 3d 776 – No.96-50869 Summary Calendar. July 3, 1997.
“The de facto is foreclosed from parity with the tangible”…
Their ‘STATUTES & CODES’ are only the colour of law, they are NOT LAW..!
They can only control, that which they create…
They are a CORPORATION, NOT a government…!
They, (government) as TRUSTEES are all in breach of their fiduciary duty & many are guilty of HIGH TREASON..!
These public servants have taken over, so that we are their servants…
This is what happens when the general population is hoodwinked into thinking they’re supposed to be acting as U.S. citizens…
It’s the exact opposite of the truth…!!!
It’s imperative to correct that tragic, mortal error mentally and in your political status…
Many years ago, when Dick Marple was a young man, he and many others quit & resigned from the State Police because they learned they weren’t law enforcement at all, in that they were ’CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICERS’ acting as ‘RE-VENUE’ generators for the Bankruptcy by fleecing living people as if they were DEAD entities / the legal fiction PERSONS /JOHN H. DOE’s under Colour of Law…
That is a serious crime & hangable /punishable by death..!
https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/affidavit-of-truth-in-commerce-and-claim-for-damages
🙏2👍1
‘PEACE’… “It does not mean to be in a place… where there is no noise… 📣 trouble or hard work”…😓
“It means to be in the midst of all those things and still be calm in your heart” ❤️
Very short 3 min video…
https://youtu.be/R5-HNXxc5kk
“It means to be in the midst of all those things and still be calm in your heart” ❤️
Very short 3 min video…
https://youtu.be/R5-HNXxc5kk
YouTube
The Samurai and the Fly - Hanjin Song
This video is included in Week 3 of the free online Mindfulness-Based Stress Reduction course (MBSR) by Palouse Mindfulness (http://palousemindfulness.com). See https://palousemindfulness.com/graduates/Emotional-Courage.html for more about this topic and…
❤3
The Presumption of Public Record; (Cannon 3228 i)
Any matter brought before a lower ‘Roman Court’ (Magistrate’s) is a matter for the ‘Public Record’, when in fact it is presumed by the ‘Private Bar Guild’ as private business.
Unless this presumption is openly rebutted, by filing or stating clearly on the ‘Public Record’… that the matter is to be part of the ‘Public Record’…
The matter remains on the private side as private Bar Guild business under private Guild rules..!
Any matter brought before a lower ‘Roman Court’ (Magistrate’s) is a matter for the ‘Public Record’, when in fact it is presumed by the ‘Private Bar Guild’ as private business.
Unless this presumption is openly rebutted, by filing or stating clearly on the ‘Public Record’… that the matter is to be part of the ‘Public Record’…
The matter remains on the private side as private Bar Guild business under private Guild rules..!
👍2
The word “include” is a ⚠️danger⚠️ word... used in “doublespeak”..!
Because not many people are aware of the ‘legal implications’... of such a word if used incorrectly..!
It defines what is included and what is excluded in a ‘legal sense’...
And if you are not aware of the nature of such words like “Include”..!
You may make a grave mistake with how you interpret a situation...
A short 30 min but very interesting & informative video... well worth watching and sharing...
Improving your ‘Grammer’... helps you to write better ‘Notice’s..!
https://youtu.be/Za1cyx0FGeQ
Because not many people are aware of the ‘legal implications’... of such a word if used incorrectly..!
It defines what is included and what is excluded in a ‘legal sense’...
And if you are not aware of the nature of such words like “Include”..!
You may make a grave mistake with how you interpret a situation...
A short 30 min but very interesting & informative video... well worth watching and sharing...
Improving your ‘Grammer’... helps you to write better ‘Notice’s..!
https://youtu.be/Za1cyx0FGeQ
YouTube
DANGER-WORD-OF-DOUBLESPEAK-INCLUDE
The word "Include" is a danger word used in "doublespeak" because not many people are aware of the legal implications with such a word if used incorrectly. It defines what is included and what is excluded in a legal sense and if you are not aware of the nature…
👍2💯1
Bouvier’s Maxim: “Cujus per errorem dati repetitio est, ejus consult dati donatio est.”
“Whoever pays by mistake what he does not owe, may recover it back; but he who pays, knowing he owes nothing; is presumed to give.”
“Whoever pays by mistake what he does not owe, may recover it back; but he who pays, knowing he owes nothing; is presumed to give.”
👍7
‘DIGLOSSA’ - ‘The Grammatical Science of Deception’
Very short 7 min Video... worth watching... to increase your knowledge..!
https://youtu.be/Od4Er8CxL2M
Very short 7 min Video... worth watching... to increase your knowledge..!
https://youtu.be/Od4Er8CxL2M
💰‘HOW to LAWFULLY STOP PAYING TAX’..!💰
Always apply the principle of ‘KISS’ (Keep It Simple Stupid)..! 🤯
Very short video 6 min..!
https://youtu.be/-rzM0KzScMg
Always apply the principle of ‘KISS’ (Keep It Simple Stupid)..! 🤯
Very short video 6 min..!
https://youtu.be/-rzM0KzScMg
👍4👏2🔥1