Trust Its the Secret Trust The law.pdf
102.2 KB
Canon 2048
Since 1933, when a child is borne in a State (Estate) under; inferior ‘Roman Law’.
Three (3) Cestui Que Vie Trusts… are created upon certain presumptions, specifically designed to… deny the child forever…
Any ‘Rights’ of ‘Real Property’; any ‘Rights’ as a ‘Free Person’; and any ‘Rights’ to be known as; man and/or woman, rather than a ‘creature and/or animal’ by claiming & possessing their ‘Soul or Spirit’..!
Since 1933, when a child is borne in a State (Estate) under; inferior ‘Roman Law’.
Three (3) Cestui Que Vie Trusts… are created upon certain presumptions, specifically designed to… deny the child forever…
Any ‘Rights’ of ‘Real Property’; any ‘Rights’ as a ‘Free Person’; and any ‘Rights’ to be known as; man and/or woman, rather than a ‘creature and/or animal’ by claiming & possessing their ‘Soul or Spirit’..!
👏7💯2❤1👍1
Legal Maxims in Law & Equity.pdf
7.1 MB
Maxims In Law:
Maxims are as much a part of the laws of human relations (commerce) as a foundation is a part of a building.
They are fundamental and immutable, having their basis in God’s Laws.
No one of sound mind argues against them..!
They are the bedrock of logic, of reason, of common sense, of truth..!
They are fundamental principles upon which all that is right, just and true is founded.
They are the standards to measure the correctness of any course or action.
The word "MAXIM": is defined as an expression of an absolute truth or principle.
Maxims are so powerful and unequivocal that they are the foundation of all human relationships.
They have the power to cut to the heart of a matter in a heartbeat with reason, logic, and authority.
They cover every topic imaginable and every aspect of our lives.
They are not easily misunderstood, misapplied, or subverted; they are universally accepted for what they are: self-evident TRUTHS.
Maxims might be considered the redundant backup system when all else fails. Anyone who is not schooled in the logic of maxims is easily confused for the want of such understanding.
The legal profession has a vested interest in keeping the People ignorant of these principles: protecting the need for their "priestcraft."
Priestcraft is "the craft of specialists who work to create the illusion their craft is too complex to be understood by anyone else."
It doesn’t take a law degree to understand maxims.
The light of truth in maxims cannot be extinguished through the evil works and craftiness of men.
They may be forgotten by many, intentionally concealed by some, but they still exist, no matter what, and they won’t go away..!
Here are maxims that surround the rightfulness & lawfulness of the ‘Commercial Affidavit’… process..!
Maxims are as much a part of the laws of human relations (commerce) as a foundation is a part of a building.
They are fundamental and immutable, having their basis in God’s Laws.
No one of sound mind argues against them..!
They are the bedrock of logic, of reason, of common sense, of truth..!
They are fundamental principles upon which all that is right, just and true is founded.
They are the standards to measure the correctness of any course or action.
The word "MAXIM": is defined as an expression of an absolute truth or principle.
Maxims are so powerful and unequivocal that they are the foundation of all human relationships.
They have the power to cut to the heart of a matter in a heartbeat with reason, logic, and authority.
They cover every topic imaginable and every aspect of our lives.
They are not easily misunderstood, misapplied, or subverted; they are universally accepted for what they are: self-evident TRUTHS.
Maxims might be considered the redundant backup system when all else fails. Anyone who is not schooled in the logic of maxims is easily confused for the want of such understanding.
The legal profession has a vested interest in keeping the People ignorant of these principles: protecting the need for their "priestcraft."
Priestcraft is "the craft of specialists who work to create the illusion their craft is too complex to be understood by anyone else."
It doesn’t take a law degree to understand maxims.
The light of truth in maxims cannot be extinguished through the evil works and craftiness of men.
They may be forgotten by many, intentionally concealed by some, but they still exist, no matter what, and they won’t go away..!
Here are maxims that surround the rightfulness & lawfulness of the ‘Commercial Affidavit’… process..!
👍3❤2
Regarding Justice
— All are equal under the Law.
— A matter must be expressed to be resolved.
— Claims made without accountability are void.
— Might does not make right.
— Force, perjury or subornation of perjury, voids all.
— Fraud vitiates the most solemn promise.
— While the battle continues, he who first leaves the field or refuses to contend loses by default.
— You are free to make any decision you wish, but you are never free to escape the consequences of your decisions.
— A labourer is worthy of his hire.
— Thou shalt not steal.
— Notice to the agent is notice to the principal and notice to the principal is notice to the agent.
— Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
Regarding Truth
— Truth stands supreme.
— Truth affects but cannot be affected.
— Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit.
— Truth will out.
— An unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth.
— An affidavit must be rebutted point-for-point.
— Thou shall not bear false witness.
— Ignorance is no respecter, it affects all without regard to position or title.
Regarding Sovereignty
— It is self-evident that all men are endowed by their creator (God) with equal and unalienable rights.
— The created cannot be greater than its creator.
— A man can give to another no more than he himself has.
— A man may not with impunity infringe upon another man’s rights.
— Men & Women are Sovereign.
— The government is the servant of the "sovereign" People.
— All are equal under the Law.
— A matter must be expressed to be resolved.
— Claims made without accountability are void.
— Might does not make right.
— Force, perjury or subornation of perjury, voids all.
— Fraud vitiates the most solemn promise.
— While the battle continues, he who first leaves the field or refuses to contend loses by default.
— You are free to make any decision you wish, but you are never free to escape the consequences of your decisions.
— A labourer is worthy of his hire.
— Thou shalt not steal.
— Notice to the agent is notice to the principal and notice to the principal is notice to the agent.
— Do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
Regarding Truth
— Truth stands supreme.
— Truth affects but cannot be affected.
— Truth is expressed in the form of an affidavit.
— Truth will out.
— An unrebutted affidavit stands as the truth.
— An affidavit must be rebutted point-for-point.
— Thou shall not bear false witness.
— Ignorance is no respecter, it affects all without regard to position or title.
Regarding Sovereignty
— It is self-evident that all men are endowed by their creator (God) with equal and unalienable rights.
— The created cannot be greater than its creator.
— A man can give to another no more than he himself has.
— A man may not with impunity infringe upon another man’s rights.
— Men & Women are Sovereign.
— The government is the servant of the "sovereign" People.
👍4❤2
Motu Proprio ~ Pope Francis 2013.pdf
422.8 KB
‘APOSTOLIC LETTER’ ~ ‘MOTU PROPRIO’…
Issued by and of the ‘THE SUPREME PONTIFF
FRANCIS’… on 11th July 2013
This is very important and powerful information…
Only 7 (seven) page’s.
An absolute must read..!
Issued by and of the ‘THE SUPREME PONTIFF
FRANCIS’… on 11th July 2013
This is very important and powerful information…
Only 7 (seven) page’s.
An absolute must read..!
👍2
The Importance of ‘Motu Propria’… by Pope Francis..!
According to the New Advent Catholic Encyclopaedia, ‘Motu Propria’ in Latin stands for “of his own accord” and is the name given to an official decree by a Pope personally in his capacity and office as supreme sovereign pontiff and not in his capacity as the apostolic leader and teacher of the Universal Church.
To put it more bluntly, a ‘Motu Propria’ is the highest form of legal instrument on the planet in accordance to its provenance, influence and structure to the Western-Roman world, overriding anything that could be issued by the United Nations, the Inner and Middle Temple, the Crown of Great Britain or any other Monarch and indeed by any head of state or body politic.
If you are a member of the United Nations, or recognized by the United States or the United Kingdom or have a bank account anywhere on the planet, then a ‘Motu Proprio’ is the highest legal instrument;
In the case of the ‘Motu Propria’ issued by Pope Francis on July 11th 2013, it is an instrument of several functions and layers:
A. In the first instance, it may be legally construed to apply to the local matters of the administration of the Holy See.
B. In the second instance, the document relates to the fact that the Holy See is the underpinning to the whole global system of law, therefore anyone holding an office anywhere in the world is also subject to these limits and that immunity no longer applies.
C. Thirdly, we see the Holy See and the Universal Church clearly separating itself from the nihilist world of the professional elite who continue to be proven time and time again with no desire to do anything honorable until they are torn from power by anyone, anybody who cares for the law.
D. The age of the Roman Cult, as first formed in the 11th Century, and that hijacked the Catholic Church first formed by the Carolingians in the 8th Century, then the Holly Christian Empire or Byzantine Church by the 13th Century and the world at large by the 16th Century, ceased to exist around March 14th 2013 upon the election of Pope Francis.
E. This document issued by Pope Francis is historic on multiple levels, but most significant above all others in that it recognizes the supremacy of the Golden Rule, the same teaching ascribed to Jesus Christ and the intimate connection to the Rule of Law, that all are subject to the rule of law, no one is above the law..!
According to the New Advent Catholic Encyclopaedia, ‘Motu Propria’ in Latin stands for “of his own accord” and is the name given to an official decree by a Pope personally in his capacity and office as supreme sovereign pontiff and not in his capacity as the apostolic leader and teacher of the Universal Church.
To put it more bluntly, a ‘Motu Propria’ is the highest form of legal instrument on the planet in accordance to its provenance, influence and structure to the Western-Roman world, overriding anything that could be issued by the United Nations, the Inner and Middle Temple, the Crown of Great Britain or any other Monarch and indeed by any head of state or body politic.
If you are a member of the United Nations, or recognized by the United States or the United Kingdom or have a bank account anywhere on the planet, then a ‘Motu Proprio’ is the highest legal instrument;
In the case of the ‘Motu Propria’ issued by Pope Francis on July 11th 2013, it is an instrument of several functions and layers:
A. In the first instance, it may be legally construed to apply to the local matters of the administration of the Holy See.
B. In the second instance, the document relates to the fact that the Holy See is the underpinning to the whole global system of law, therefore anyone holding an office anywhere in the world is also subject to these limits and that immunity no longer applies.
C. Thirdly, we see the Holy See and the Universal Church clearly separating itself from the nihilist world of the professional elite who continue to be proven time and time again with no desire to do anything honorable until they are torn from power by anyone, anybody who cares for the law.
D. The age of the Roman Cult, as first formed in the 11th Century, and that hijacked the Catholic Church first formed by the Carolingians in the 8th Century, then the Holly Christian Empire or Byzantine Church by the 13th Century and the world at large by the 16th Century, ceased to exist around March 14th 2013 upon the election of Pope Francis.
E. This document issued by Pope Francis is historic on multiple levels, but most significant above all others in that it recognizes the supremacy of the Golden Rule, the same teaching ascribed to Jesus Christ and the intimate connection to the Rule of Law, that all are subject to the rule of law, no one is above the law..!
👍6❤1
‘Legal Fiction’ v ‘Reality’
Parliamentary legislation cannot impose a duty on anyone without their consent.
It is nevertheless, worth examining the real meaning behind the definition of ‘person’, to which legislation refers.
In order to include you in the ‘Contract Law of Statute’, the government creates a legal ‘person’ with the same name as you; but adding a title like;
‘Mr’, ‘Mrs’ or ‘Dr’. (as most here will know; this is usually done by registering the birth with the authorities in return for a birth certificate).
For the purposes of determination under English law, this ‘person’ has ostensibly the same status as a ‘Corporation’.
Since a ‘Corporation’ (a limited company) is usually some form of document or register; incorporating individual ‘men & women’ into a society.
You as a ‘person’ also become a piece of paper; with only ‘notional rights’; according to ‘Admiralty; Maritime, Commercial & Contract Law’; as juxtaposed to… ‘Primary English Natural Common Law’… GOD’s Law of Right & Wrong… “Cause no Harm and/or Loss; to another man or woman and /or their property and/or their rights…” (remember; ‘injury’ is a ’legal’ term).
‘Black’s Law’… has changed its definition of ‘person’ in its dictionaries over the years, which has only served to confuse the issue (although a lack of clarity to a reasonable man in written law; means that it cannot have the force of the Law).
‘Black’s 3rd Edition’… defined ‘person’ as ‘legal fiction’. The latest edition offers the following definitions:
1. ‘human being’; also termed ‘natural person’
2. ‘an entity (such as a corporation) that is recognised by law, as having most of the ‘rights & duties’ of a human being. In this sense the term includes partnerships & other associations, whether incorporated or unincorporated’.
3. ‘artificial person’, ‘fictitious person’ defined as ‘an entity’, such as a ‘Corporation’, created by law and given certain ‘legal rights & duties’ of a ‘human being’: a being real or imaginary, who for the purposes of ‘legal’ reasoning is treated more or less as a human being.
4. ‘persona ficta’ [Latin ~ ‘false mask’] historical. A ‘fictional person’ such as a ‘Corporation’
Black’s Law, 9th edition.
Despite the best efforts of the shysters who draft ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’ to confuse the issue.
It is still clear, that there is a difference between; a real ‘man’ created by ‘God’ ~ (whether you choose to call that man; a ‘human being’ or a ‘natural person’) ~ and the ‘person’; a ‘title’ created by a state; with the intention that a ‘man’ be judged under the same legislation, as a ‘Corporation’ ~ which ‘Black’s Law’ clearly defines as a ‘fictitious and/or ‘artificial person’; in other words a ‘legal fiction’.
In addition to which; the reason a ‘Corporation’ cannot have all the ‘rights & duties’ of a ‘human being’ or ‘man’ ~ as conceded by ‘Black’s Law’ in the definitions above.
Is that, unlike a real ‘man’ and/or ‘woman’.
A ‘Corporation’ cannot reject ‘legislation’ in favour of its Primary Natural ‘Common Law rights’… whereas; a man and/or woman can.
From historical context cited above, it is also quite clear, that the ‘person’ is a role or ‘fiction’ – a ‘mask’ ~ we adopt by consent, to be judged under ‘English Statute’ & ‘Contract Law’.
The ‘person’ is no more you; than any ‘mask’ you adopt to play a role.
Once you no longer consent, to play that role, you cast off the ‘mask’ and/or ‘person’ in a way that you cannot cast off your status as a real ‘man or woman’..!
Parliamentary legislation cannot impose a duty on anyone without their consent.
It is nevertheless, worth examining the real meaning behind the definition of ‘person’, to which legislation refers.
In order to include you in the ‘Contract Law of Statute’, the government creates a legal ‘person’ with the same name as you; but adding a title like;
‘Mr’, ‘Mrs’ or ‘Dr’. (as most here will know; this is usually done by registering the birth with the authorities in return for a birth certificate).
For the purposes of determination under English law, this ‘person’ has ostensibly the same status as a ‘Corporation’.
Since a ‘Corporation’ (a limited company) is usually some form of document or register; incorporating individual ‘men & women’ into a society.
You as a ‘person’ also become a piece of paper; with only ‘notional rights’; according to ‘Admiralty; Maritime, Commercial & Contract Law’; as juxtaposed to… ‘Primary English Natural Common Law’… GOD’s Law of Right & Wrong… “Cause no Harm and/or Loss; to another man or woman and /or their property and/or their rights…” (remember; ‘injury’ is a ’legal’ term).
‘Black’s Law’… has changed its definition of ‘person’ in its dictionaries over the years, which has only served to confuse the issue (although a lack of clarity to a reasonable man in written law; means that it cannot have the force of the Law).
‘Black’s 3rd Edition’… defined ‘person’ as ‘legal fiction’. The latest edition offers the following definitions:
1. ‘human being’; also termed ‘natural person’
2. ‘an entity (such as a corporation) that is recognised by law, as having most of the ‘rights & duties’ of a human being. In this sense the term includes partnerships & other associations, whether incorporated or unincorporated’.
3. ‘artificial person’, ‘fictitious person’ defined as ‘an entity’, such as a ‘Corporation’, created by law and given certain ‘legal rights & duties’ of a ‘human being’: a being real or imaginary, who for the purposes of ‘legal’ reasoning is treated more or less as a human being.
4. ‘persona ficta’ [Latin ~ ‘false mask’] historical. A ‘fictional person’ such as a ‘Corporation’
Black’s Law, 9th edition.
Despite the best efforts of the shysters who draft ‘Black’s Law Dictionary’ to confuse the issue.
It is still clear, that there is a difference between; a real ‘man’ created by ‘God’ ~ (whether you choose to call that man; a ‘human being’ or a ‘natural person’) ~ and the ‘person’; a ‘title’ created by a state; with the intention that a ‘man’ be judged under the same legislation, as a ‘Corporation’ ~ which ‘Black’s Law’ clearly defines as a ‘fictitious and/or ‘artificial person’; in other words a ‘legal fiction’.
In addition to which; the reason a ‘Corporation’ cannot have all the ‘rights & duties’ of a ‘human being’ or ‘man’ ~ as conceded by ‘Black’s Law’ in the definitions above.
Is that, unlike a real ‘man’ and/or ‘woman’.
A ‘Corporation’ cannot reject ‘legislation’ in favour of its Primary Natural ‘Common Law rights’… whereas; a man and/or woman can.
From historical context cited above, it is also quite clear, that the ‘person’ is a role or ‘fiction’ – a ‘mask’ ~ we adopt by consent, to be judged under ‘English Statute’ & ‘Contract Law’.
The ‘person’ is no more you; than any ‘mask’ you adopt to play a role.
Once you no longer consent, to play that role, you cast off the ‘mask’ and/or ‘person’ in a way that you cannot cast off your status as a real ‘man or woman’..!
❤10👍5
"The Dead Baby Scams -- both of them -- result in the victims being declared legally dead and intestate, that is, without leaving a Will. This then leaves the courts with a free hand to probate the estate and for the officers of the court to act as Executors de Son Tort in favor of the King or the Pope or other Principal thought to have an interest in the resulting estates".
http://www.paulstramer.net/2023/06/the-national-trust-frauds.html
http://www.paulstramer.net/2023/06/the-national-trust-frauds.html
www.paulstramer.net
The National Trust Frauds
By Anna Von Reitz Information provided to H.E. Cardinal Mamberti and the Vatican Chancery Court regarding our Claim March 6 2005, Januar...
🙏4
👍9❤4🙏2
How to Autograph Your Appellation: Name.pdf
210 KB
How to Autograph ✍🏼 Your Appellation with Distinction
🔥4
Deadly Maxims of Law to Agents of the Crown.pdf
159.2 KB
The Deadliest ‘Maxims of Law’ to any Agent of the Crown 👑 ..!
Enabling you to press your ‘Commercial Lien’ on to the Public Record… ✍🏼
Enabling you to press your ‘Commercial Lien’ on to the Public Record… ✍🏼
👍2
Notice of Rejection of Invalid Invoice.PDF
130.4 KB
‘Notice’ of Rejection of Invalid Invoice…
Very useful if your dealing ‘Debt Collection Agency’s…
However: it’s not the be all; and all of the process… it’s only a component of the Whole…
‘Disclaimer’: This ‘Notice’ wasn’t written by i… it’s something that i came across while surfing 🏄🏽♂️ the Net… and thought it maybe useful to someone at some point in time…
::PEACE:: 🐝🕊🌈❤️
Very useful if your dealing ‘Debt Collection Agency’s…
However: it’s not the be all; and all of the process… it’s only a component of the Whole…
‘Disclaimer’: This ‘Notice’ wasn’t written by i… it’s something that i came across while surfing 🏄🏽♂️ the Net… and thought it maybe useful to someone at some point in time…
::PEACE:: 🐝🕊🌈
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🙏2👍1
‘Shills, Trolls, Controlled Opposition’… and all the usual suspects; et al…
Listen 👂🏻 and weep 😢
We’ve all been fooled and suckerd in at some point… the real question is… are you going to continue to be fooled… Hmmm 🤔
from Craig; aka ‘GumShoe Sleuth’…
Never a ‘truer’ word said… right on target 🎯
https://youtu.be/qAKad93X1UU
Listen 👂🏻 and weep 😢
We’ve all been fooled and suckerd in at some point… the real question is… are you going to continue to be fooled… Hmmm 🤔
from Craig; aka ‘GumShoe Sleuth’…
Never a ‘truer’ word said… right on target 🎯
https://youtu.be/qAKad93X1UU
YouTube
Just a quick one
info@trustassetprotectors.com
🔥3💯1
Parliament would have you believe that only 4 clauses are still in effect…
This is a LIE..!
…if that were true… then ‘Article 61’ the… “right to lawfully rebel”… would not have been constitutionally & lawful invoked on February 2001 by the ‘Committee of Barons’…
Calling on Queen Elizabeth II to revoke the UK’s 🇬🇧 illegal entry to the ‘Common Market’… E.U. ~ (European Union).
see below ⬇️⬇️⬇️
This is a LIE..!
…if that were true… then ‘Article 61’ the… “right to lawfully rebel”… would not have been constitutionally & lawful invoked on February 2001 by the ‘Committee of Barons’…
Calling on Queen Elizabeth II to revoke the UK’s 🇬🇧 illegal entry to the ‘Common Market’… E.U. ~ (European Union).
see below ⬇️⬇️⬇️
👍3
(C) Barons Actual Petition to QEII.pdf
217.6 KB
Actual Barons Petition
(D) Telegraph - Peers Petition Queen.pdf
461.3 KB
Four Peers invoke ‘Article 61’ ~ Article published in the ‘Telegraph’…
👍1
(B) The Coronation Oath.pdf
117.9 KB
The Coronation Oath of Queen Elizabeth II… (contract)…
She failed miserably in her duties & broke her contract with the people of this realm… and the people of the Commonwealth Nations…
Thereby committing ‘Treason’ against ‘we the people’… of ‘Great Britain Northern Ireland and the Commonwealth’s…
She failed miserably in her duties & broke her contract with the people of this realm… and the people of the Commonwealth Nations…
Thereby committing ‘Treason’ against ‘we the people’… of ‘Great Britain Northern Ireland and the Commonwealth’s…
💯3👍1