COUNCIL TAX: Bristow & Sutor Case Law;
All you need to do with these debt collectors, is send them a copy of the ‘Leighton vs Bristow & Sutor’… ruling in the High Court.
This ruling simply means, that the Bailiffs / DCA (Debt Collection Agency’s) have to show, a physical copy of the ‘Liability Order’…
As there is no physical copy of the ‘Liability Order’ the alleged debt can’t be enforced..!
Tell them; that if they don’t stop communicating with you and drop their claim (without proof), you will take them to court and win just like Wayne Leighton did..!
Ref. J90SA002
Read the full judgement here..! Below 👇🏼
https://awakenedgb.wordpress.com/2024/03/01/council-tax-bristow-sutor-case-law
All you need to do with these debt collectors, is send them a copy of the ‘Leighton vs Bristow & Sutor’… ruling in the High Court.
This ruling simply means, that the Bailiffs / DCA (Debt Collection Agency’s) have to show, a physical copy of the ‘Liability Order’…
As there is no physical copy of the ‘Liability Order’ the alleged debt can’t be enforced..!
Tell them; that if they don’t stop communicating with you and drop their claim (without proof), you will take them to court and win just like Wayne Leighton did..!
Ref. J90SA002
Read the full judgement here..! Below 👇🏼
https://awakenedgb.wordpress.com/2024/03/01/council-tax-bristow-sutor-case-law
Awakened-GB
Council Tax: Bristow & Sutor Case Law
All you need to do with these debt collectors is send them a copy of the Leighton vs Bristow and Sutor ruling in the High Court. This ruling simply means that the bailiffs/DCA has to show a physica…
🔥12👏4🙏3👍1
“The Man Who Thinks”..!
If you think you are beaten you are; if you think you dare not, you don't…
If you'd like to win, but you think you can't, it’s almost a certain that you won't…
If you think you'll lose, you've lost; for out in this world we find. Success begins with a fellow's will, it’s all in the state of mind…
If you think you're outclassed, you are; you've got to think high to rise. You've got to be sure of yourself before You can ever win the prize…
Life's battles don't always go; to the stronger or faster man; but sooner or later the man who wins, is the man who thinks he can…!!!
If you think you are beaten you are; if you think you dare not, you don't…
If you'd like to win, but you think you can't, it’s almost a certain that you won't…
If you think you'll lose, you've lost; for out in this world we find. Success begins with a fellow's will, it’s all in the state of mind…
If you think you're outclassed, you are; you've got to think high to rise. You've got to be sure of yourself before You can ever win the prize…
Life's battles don't always go; to the stronger or faster man; but sooner or later the man who wins, is the man who thinks he can…!!!
👏18🔥11🤔1
“How to Deal with Fake Warrants”! ‘Private Companies (Pirate’s) 🏴☠️ Misleading the Public, the Courts & the Police’!
Debt Collectors & agents are private companies & cannot enter private homes with a locksmith to recover unlawful ‘debts’ including Council Tax, PCNs, and/or Unpaid Energy Bills.
The ‘Data Protection Act 2018’ requires all corporations registered with Companies House to be responsible for managing your data correctly.
By applying for fraudulent warrants or passing your data onto a third party. They are misusing your data & in breach of breaking their role as a fiduciary.
They are supposed to be in a position of responsibility & trusted to hold YOUR data responsibly.
What can you do?
https://awakenedgb.wordpress.com/2024/03/13/responding-to-fake-warrants
1/ 💥 Write ✍🏼 a ‘Notice of Complaint’ directly to the Court issuing the Warrant. Informing them that the warrants are fraudulent & are made with the misuse of data.
Find Here https://www.find-court-tribunal.service.gov.uk/search-by-name
2/ 💥 Write ✍🏼 a ‘Notice of Complaint’ to HMCTS about the company applying for fraudulent warrants by not supplying a contract or actual meter readings only estimates.
https://hmcts-complaint-form-eng.form.service.justice.gov.u
1. The warrant says: Agent Not Employee. Breach of Gas Act 1954. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/2-3/21/section
2. Let the court know, they are not a Network Operator. Breach of Gas Act 1954. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/2-3/21/section/2
3. Let the court know, they are not a Supplier. Breach & pursuant to the Electricity Act 1989. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/29/schedule/6
4. The Court can Check companies house to verify. Supply them with the URL & a screenshot of the SIC code for that Company.
5. They have no ‘Contract’ or ‘Deed of Assignment’.
6. In Breach of the ‘Data Protection Act 2018’: Failing in their Fiduciary Duties. Write ✍🏼 a ‘Notice of Complaint’ to the ICO. https://ico.org.uk/make-a-complaint
7. In Breach of the ‘Fraud Act 2006’ Section 2: Fraud by false representation.
8. In Breach of the ‘Fraud Act 2006’ Section 3: Fraud by failing to disclose information…
9. In Breach of the ‘Fraud Act 2006’ Section 4: Fraud by abuse of position…
10. In Breach of the ‘Fraud Act 2006’ Section 7: Making or Supplying Articles for use in fraud.
‘Fraud Act 2006’’ Section 3: Fraud by failing to disclose information.
“A person is in breach of this section if he”
a) dishonestly fails to disclose to another person information which he/she is under a legal duty to disclose, or
b) intends, by failing to disclose the information
(i) to make a gain for him/herself or another, or (ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.
‘Fraud Act 2006’ Section 4: Fraud by abuse of position.
1/ A person is in breach of this section if he
a) occupies a position in which he is expected to safeguard, or not to act against, the financial interests of another person
b) dishonestly abuses that position &
c) intends, by means of the abuse of that position (i) to make a gain for himself or another, or (ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.
2/ A person may be regarded as having abused his position even though his conduct consisted of an omission rather than an act.
‘Fraud Act 2006, Section 7’. Making or supplying articles for use in frauds
3/ A person is guilty of an offence if he makes adapts supplies or offers to supply any article
a) knowing that it is designed or adapted for use in the course of or in connection with fraud or
b) intending it to be used to commit or assist in the commission of fraud.
4/ A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable
(a) on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or both;
(b) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years or to a fine (or both).
This is very important information every ‘living man & women’ should know.
Debt Collectors & agents are private companies & cannot enter private homes with a locksmith to recover unlawful ‘debts’ including Council Tax, PCNs, and/or Unpaid Energy Bills.
The ‘Data Protection Act 2018’ requires all corporations registered with Companies House to be responsible for managing your data correctly.
By applying for fraudulent warrants or passing your data onto a third party. They are misusing your data & in breach of breaking their role as a fiduciary.
They are supposed to be in a position of responsibility & trusted to hold YOUR data responsibly.
What can you do?
https://awakenedgb.wordpress.com/2024/03/13/responding-to-fake-warrants
1/ 💥 Write ✍🏼 a ‘Notice of Complaint’ directly to the Court issuing the Warrant. Informing them that the warrants are fraudulent & are made with the misuse of data.
Find Here https://www.find-court-tribunal.service.gov.uk/search-by-name
2/ 💥 Write ✍🏼 a ‘Notice of Complaint’ to HMCTS about the company applying for fraudulent warrants by not supplying a contract or actual meter readings only estimates.
https://hmcts-complaint-form-eng.form.service.justice.gov.u
1. The warrant says: Agent Not Employee. Breach of Gas Act 1954. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/2-3/21/section
2. Let the court know, they are not a Network Operator. Breach of Gas Act 1954. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Eliz2/2-3/21/section/2
3. Let the court know, they are not a Supplier. Breach & pursuant to the Electricity Act 1989. https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1989/29/schedule/6
4. The Court can Check companies house to verify. Supply them with the URL & a screenshot of the SIC code for that Company.
5. They have no ‘Contract’ or ‘Deed of Assignment’.
6. In Breach of the ‘Data Protection Act 2018’: Failing in their Fiduciary Duties. Write ✍🏼 a ‘Notice of Complaint’ to the ICO. https://ico.org.uk/make-a-complaint
7. In Breach of the ‘Fraud Act 2006’ Section 2: Fraud by false representation.
8. In Breach of the ‘Fraud Act 2006’ Section 3: Fraud by failing to disclose information…
9. In Breach of the ‘Fraud Act 2006’ Section 4: Fraud by abuse of position…
10. In Breach of the ‘Fraud Act 2006’ Section 7: Making or Supplying Articles for use in fraud.
‘Fraud Act 2006’’ Section 3: Fraud by failing to disclose information.
“A person is in breach of this section if he”
a) dishonestly fails to disclose to another person information which he/she is under a legal duty to disclose, or
b) intends, by failing to disclose the information
(i) to make a gain for him/herself or another, or (ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.
‘Fraud Act 2006’ Section 4: Fraud by abuse of position.
1/ A person is in breach of this section if he
a) occupies a position in which he is expected to safeguard, or not to act against, the financial interests of another person
b) dishonestly abuses that position &
c) intends, by means of the abuse of that position (i) to make a gain for himself or another, or (ii) to cause loss to another or to expose another to a risk of loss.
2/ A person may be regarded as having abused his position even though his conduct consisted of an omission rather than an act.
‘Fraud Act 2006, Section 7’. Making or supplying articles for use in frauds
3/ A person is guilty of an offence if he makes adapts supplies or offers to supply any article
a) knowing that it is designed or adapted for use in the course of or in connection with fraud or
b) intending it to be used to commit or assist in the commission of fraud.
4/ A person guilty of an offence under this section is liable
(a) on summary conviction, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 12 months or to a fine not exceeding the statutory maximum or both;
(b) on conviction on indictment, to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 10 years or to a fine (or both).
This is very important information every ‘living man & women’ should know.
Awakened-GB
Responding to Fake Warrants
Private Companies Misleading the Public, the Courts, and the Police Debt Collectors and agents are private companies and cannot enter private homes with a locksmith to recover unlawful ‘debts…
🔥8👍3
Bills of Exchange Act 1882.
CHAPTER 61 45 & 46 Vict
BILL OF EXCHANGE:
- Promissory Note
- Cheque
- Papermoney
- Card Payments
- CBDC
A PROMISE TO PAY
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/45-46/61
CHAPTER 61 45 & 46 Vict
BILL OF EXCHANGE:
- Promissory Note
- Cheque
- Papermoney
- Card Payments
- CBDC
A PROMISE TO PAY
https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/Vict/45-46/61
👍5
“The Molmutine Laws: The History of Magna Carta.”
The basis for English Common Law, the Law of the Land, is the ancient Molmutine Laws which were implemented by our second monarch, King Molmutius, who was the successor to Brutus, the founder of Britain.
The Trojan Brutus, the great-grandson of Prince Aeneas, came from the line of Japheth, the son of Noah. He and his group may have been responsible for bringing the sophisticated thinking of ancient Greece and Troy to England.
The Laws were written as a set of triads based on the Celtic sacred number of creation, three: father, mother, and child.
The way the law was implemented is unusual in that they did not keep records of the trials to avoid the setting of precedence so that each case could be judged on an individual basis.
This meant that a fair and true judgement was always passed because the nuances of each case were not ignored in favour of following the rulings of previous judgements.
In contrast, contemporary English law places great importance on the setting of precedence through Case Law in the higher courts which is strictly followed by the lower courts.
The Molmutine Laws were followed in England until the 9th Century when the Anglo-Saxon King Alfred the Great used them as the basis for reforming the legal system. He had them translated from the original Briton into Latin so that they could be translated into Anglo-Saxon and brought into his own legal framework. King Alfred’s Doombook compiled ancient laws with longstanding Germanic customs, and practices from the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms with added Christian principles.
King Alfred’s Law is now considered to be the basis for English Common Law and the source of concepts such as liberty of the individual, family life, a decentralized government, and equal justice for all under the law.
William the Norman replaced King Alfred’s law with a feudal system of government which concentrated power into the hands of the king resulting in the unbridled power of King John against the people, which Magna Carta sought to limit.
Magna Carta is now the oldest consolidated written statement of English Law, as noted by William Blackstone in his Commentaries *85. British judge, Lord Denning, described the Magna Carta as “the greatest constitutional document of all times – the foundation of the freedom of the individual against the arbitrary authority of the despot.”
In 1215, Magna Carta gave us the solution to a tyrannical government in the form of Trial By Jury, a clear principle of English constitutional law. This gives the people the right to judge the law and the justice of the law as a guard against government oppression.
Legume Terrae, the Law of the Land, as established in Magna Carta was the common, ancient, fundamental law, that the Kings were bound by oath to observe. It did not include any acts, statutes, or laws enacted by the King himself, the legislative power of the nation at that time. Therefore, our current legislation is constitutionally subordinate to the concept of Common Law Juries where the people judge the law, not the Judiciary.
Our statutory legal system has confused the understanding of the term ‘Common Law’ by using it to describe what should be known as Case Law as determined by a Judge in the higher courts.
https://awakenedgb.wordpress.com/2024/04/14/the-molmutine-laws-the-history-of-magna-carta
The basis for English Common Law, the Law of the Land, is the ancient Molmutine Laws which were implemented by our second monarch, King Molmutius, who was the successor to Brutus, the founder of Britain.
The Trojan Brutus, the great-grandson of Prince Aeneas, came from the line of Japheth, the son of Noah. He and his group may have been responsible for bringing the sophisticated thinking of ancient Greece and Troy to England.
The Laws were written as a set of triads based on the Celtic sacred number of creation, three: father, mother, and child.
The way the law was implemented is unusual in that they did not keep records of the trials to avoid the setting of precedence so that each case could be judged on an individual basis.
This meant that a fair and true judgement was always passed because the nuances of each case were not ignored in favour of following the rulings of previous judgements.
In contrast, contemporary English law places great importance on the setting of precedence through Case Law in the higher courts which is strictly followed by the lower courts.
The Molmutine Laws were followed in England until the 9th Century when the Anglo-Saxon King Alfred the Great used them as the basis for reforming the legal system. He had them translated from the original Briton into Latin so that they could be translated into Anglo-Saxon and brought into his own legal framework. King Alfred’s Doombook compiled ancient laws with longstanding Germanic customs, and practices from the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms with added Christian principles.
King Alfred’s Law is now considered to be the basis for English Common Law and the source of concepts such as liberty of the individual, family life, a decentralized government, and equal justice for all under the law.
William the Norman replaced King Alfred’s law with a feudal system of government which concentrated power into the hands of the king resulting in the unbridled power of King John against the people, which Magna Carta sought to limit.
Magna Carta is now the oldest consolidated written statement of English Law, as noted by William Blackstone in his Commentaries *85. British judge, Lord Denning, described the Magna Carta as “the greatest constitutional document of all times – the foundation of the freedom of the individual against the arbitrary authority of the despot.”
In 1215, Magna Carta gave us the solution to a tyrannical government in the form of Trial By Jury, a clear principle of English constitutional law. This gives the people the right to judge the law and the justice of the law as a guard against government oppression.
Legume Terrae, the Law of the Land, as established in Magna Carta was the common, ancient, fundamental law, that the Kings were bound by oath to observe. It did not include any acts, statutes, or laws enacted by the King himself, the legislative power of the nation at that time. Therefore, our current legislation is constitutionally subordinate to the concept of Common Law Juries where the people judge the law, not the Judiciary.
Our statutory legal system has confused the understanding of the term ‘Common Law’ by using it to describe what should be known as Case Law as determined by a Judge in the higher courts.
https://awakenedgb.wordpress.com/2024/04/14/the-molmutine-laws-the-history-of-magna-carta
Awakened-GB
The Molmutine Laws: The History of Magna Carta
The Molmutine Laws: The History of Magna Carta The basis for English Common Law, the Law of the Land, is the ancient Molmutine Laws which were implemented by our second monarch, King Molmutius, who…
👍8⚡3
This is your public Notice from this channel & i… the channel owner..!
“You simply have to take whatever action you can… "reasonably" take to resist crimes, such as coming to the aid of victims, refusing to take illegal orders, organising groups (Neighbourhood Watch, State Assembly Militias, Children’s' Health Defense Fund) to fight crime, organizing boycotts & work stoppages and similar actions to bring criminal agendas to a stop, organising legal actions to involuntarily dissolve criminal corporations (e.g., Pfizer) and underlying crime syndicates (e.g., World Economic Forum)…“
“If you don't take every reasonable action you can take, you may be considered an accomplice or enabler, and be brought to justice yourself, as if you were part of the criminal activity itself by acquiescence.”
http://www.paulstramer.net/2023/02/why-you-must-take-action-in-lawful.html
“You simply have to take whatever action you can… "reasonably" take to resist crimes, such as coming to the aid of victims, refusing to take illegal orders, organising groups (Neighbourhood Watch, State Assembly Militias, Children’s' Health Defense Fund) to fight crime, organizing boycotts & work stoppages and similar actions to bring criminal agendas to a stop, organising legal actions to involuntarily dissolve criminal corporations (e.g., Pfizer) and underlying crime syndicates (e.g., World Economic Forum)…“
“If you don't take every reasonable action you can take, you may be considered an accomplice or enabler, and be brought to justice yourself, as if you were part of the criminal activity itself by acquiescence.”
http://www.paulstramer.net/2023/02/why-you-must-take-action-in-lawful.html
www.paulstramer.net
Why You MUST Take Action in Lawful Rebellion
By Anna Von Reitz I have mentioned many times before that if you become aware of a crime or even reasonably suspect that a crime has been o...
🔥5🤔2
“Why the Offered Restitution Isn't Restitution ~ No More Taxation, Period..!”
By Anna Von Reitz
Many people have received word from various sources that their share of the spoils collected from the guilty foreign governmental services corporations is $13,200,000…
This is incorrect… It's actually a lot more… That's just part of the "restitution" owed…
If you and everyone else were to receive this so-called restitution payment as "Federal Reserve Notes" it would be worthless or be made worthless in short order, because of the hyperinflation induced by that much cash value hitting the economy all at once…
The guilty parties could stand back and say, "See, we repaid you!" --- worthless paper, that is, and then your own stupidity spending it like drunken sailors would render it even more worthless…
“All that glitters is not gold..!”
The rest of their proposal stinks like an old outhouse, too…
A 14% "sales tax" on new purchases? What for?
There is enough money in the remaining Slush Funds to fund every aspect of public spending forevermore…
That's just a gratuitous charge to keep people believing in the "need" for taxation when there hasn't been any valid reason for taxation since 1941…
Enough already..!
And while they pretend that they are implementing the ‘NESARA’ that resulted from the efforts of… General Roy Schwasinger (and my Mother, by the way) they are instead implementing the "substitute" proposal deceptively abbreviated the same way…
There are two (2) x "NESARAs" ~ the ‘National Economic Security and Restoration Act’ is the actual ‘NESARA’, but there is also the ‘National Economic Stabilisation and Reform Act’ --- another doppelgänger… that they are trying to pass off the same way that they passed off "Confederate States" ~ that is, states-of-states, for actual States of the Union…
The actual ‘NESARA’… never included any taxation measures and doesn't provide for lump sum payouts of the kind these yahoos are trying to foist off…
So ~ buyer beware..!
If you accept their offered $13,200,000… worth of paper, you sever your claim to your own land & home & names & other intellectual property, and allow them to settle their actual debt to you and yours for less than pennies on the dollar…
You & your children also tie yourselves to a 14% gratuity tax on everything you buy except "new purchases" ~ the big problem is that they still get to define what is taxable and what isn't..!
They can redefine "new" & "non-essential" and pretty soon you will be giving them 14% of everything including income from selling land & gold and anything else…
Don't forget you are both Buyers & Sellers and any burden of tax collection or payment that you place on others also falls on you..!
So, their version of "NESARA" just isn't good enough…!!!
It does nothing to return your stolen land and other property interests to you. It attempts to pay off debt owed to you with credit that is also owed to you…
It attempts to substitute a different "NESARA" for the one you are owed…
It guarantees the collapse of the Federal Reserve Note… due to hyperinflation, which would make any "restitution" based on it worthless in short order…
You'd be paying a million such "dollars" for a loaf of bread..!
So, wise up, Campers, and don't take any wooden nickels from British Flim-Flam artists..!
http://www.paulstramer.net/2023/02/why-offered-restitution-isnt.html?m=1
By Anna Von Reitz
Many people have received word from various sources that their share of the spoils collected from the guilty foreign governmental services corporations is $13,200,000…
This is incorrect… It's actually a lot more… That's just part of the "restitution" owed…
If you and everyone else were to receive this so-called restitution payment as "Federal Reserve Notes" it would be worthless or be made worthless in short order, because of the hyperinflation induced by that much cash value hitting the economy all at once…
The guilty parties could stand back and say, "See, we repaid you!" --- worthless paper, that is, and then your own stupidity spending it like drunken sailors would render it even more worthless…
“All that glitters is not gold..!”
The rest of their proposal stinks like an old outhouse, too…
A 14% "sales tax" on new purchases? What for?
There is enough money in the remaining Slush Funds to fund every aspect of public spending forevermore…
That's just a gratuitous charge to keep people believing in the "need" for taxation when there hasn't been any valid reason for taxation since 1941…
Enough already..!
And while they pretend that they are implementing the ‘NESARA’ that resulted from the efforts of… General Roy Schwasinger (and my Mother, by the way) they are instead implementing the "substitute" proposal deceptively abbreviated the same way…
There are two (2) x "NESARAs" ~ the ‘National Economic Security and Restoration Act’ is the actual ‘NESARA’, but there is also the ‘National Economic Stabilisation and Reform Act’ --- another doppelgänger… that they are trying to pass off the same way that they passed off "Confederate States" ~ that is, states-of-states, for actual States of the Union…
The actual ‘NESARA’… never included any taxation measures and doesn't provide for lump sum payouts of the kind these yahoos are trying to foist off…
So ~ buyer beware..!
If you accept their offered $13,200,000… worth of paper, you sever your claim to your own land & home & names & other intellectual property, and allow them to settle their actual debt to you and yours for less than pennies on the dollar…
You & your children also tie yourselves to a 14% gratuity tax on everything you buy except "new purchases" ~ the big problem is that they still get to define what is taxable and what isn't..!
They can redefine "new" & "non-essential" and pretty soon you will be giving them 14% of everything including income from selling land & gold and anything else…
Don't forget you are both Buyers & Sellers and any burden of tax collection or payment that you place on others also falls on you..!
So, their version of "NESARA" just isn't good enough…!!!
It does nothing to return your stolen land and other property interests to you. It attempts to pay off debt owed to you with credit that is also owed to you…
It attempts to substitute a different "NESARA" for the one you are owed…
It guarantees the collapse of the Federal Reserve Note… due to hyperinflation, which would make any "restitution" based on it worthless in short order…
You'd be paying a million such "dollars" for a loaf of bread..!
So, wise up, Campers, and don't take any wooden nickels from British Flim-Flam artists..!
http://www.paulstramer.net/2023/02/why-offered-restitution-isnt.html?m=1
www.paulstramer.net
Why the Offered Restitution Isn't Restitution -- No More Taxation, Period
By Anna Von Reitz Many people have received word from various sources that their share of the spoils collected from the guilty foreign gove...
👍4🔥2🤔1