“The Molmutine Laws: The History of Magna Carta.”

The basis for English Common Law, the Law of the Land, is the ancient Molmutine Laws which were implemented by our second monarch, King Molmutius, who was the successor to Brutus, the founder of Britain.

The Trojan Brutus, the great-grandson of Prince Aeneas, came from the line of Japheth, the son of Noah. He and his group may have been responsible for bringing the sophisticated thinking of ancient Greece and Troy to England.

The Laws were written as a set of triads based on the Celtic sacred number of creation, three: father, mother, and child.

The way the law was implemented is unusual in that they did not keep records of the trials to avoid the setting of precedence so that each case could be judged on an individual basis.

This meant that a fair and true judgement was always passed because the nuances of each case were not ignored in favour of following the rulings of previous judgements.

In contrast, contemporary English law places great importance on the setting of precedence through Case Law in the higher courts which is strictly followed by the lower courts.

The Molmutine Laws were followed in England until the 9th Century when the Anglo-Saxon King Alfred the Great used them as the basis for reforming the legal system. He had them translated from the original Briton into Latin so that they could be translated into Anglo-Saxon and brought into his own legal framework. King Alfred’s Doombook compiled ancient laws with longstanding Germanic customs, and practices from the Anglo-Saxon kingdoms with added Christian principles.

King Alfred’s Law is now considered to be the basis for English Common Law and the source of concepts such as liberty of the individual, family life, a decentralized government, and equal justice for all under the law.

William the Norman replaced King Alfred’s law with a feudal system of government which concentrated power into the hands of the king resulting in the unbridled power of King John against the people, which Magna Carta sought to limit.

Magna Carta is now the oldest consolidated written statement of English Law, as noted by William Blackstone in his Commentaries *85. British judge, Lord Denning, described the Magna Carta as “the greatest constitutional document of all times – the foundation of the freedom of the individual against the arbitrary authority of the despot.”

In 1215, Magna Carta gave us the solution to a tyrannical government in the form of Trial By Jury, a clear principle of English constitutional law. This gives the people the right to judge the law and the justice of the law as a guard against government oppression.

Legume Terrae, the Law of the Land, as established in Magna Carta was the common, ancient, fundamental law, that the Kings were bound by oath to observe. It did not include any acts, statutes, or laws enacted by the King himself, the legislative power of the nation at that time. Therefore, our current legislation is constitutionally subordinate to the concept of Common Law Juries where the people judge the law, not the Judiciary.

Our statutory legal system has confused the understanding of the term ‘Common Law’ by using it to describe what should be known as Case Law as determined by a Judge in the higher courts.

https://awakenedgb.wordpress.com/2024/04/14/the-molmutine-laws-the-history-of-magna-carta

This is your public Notice from this channel & i… the channel owner..!

“You simply have to take whatever action you can… "reasonably" take to resist crimes, such as coming to the aid of victims, refusing to take illegal orders, organising groups (Neighbourhood Watch, State Assembly Militias, Children’s' Health Defense Fund) to fight crime, organizing boycotts & work stoppages and similar actions to bring criminal agendas to a stop, organising legal actions to involuntarily dissolve criminal corporations (e.g., Pfizer) and underlying crime syndicates (e.g., World Economic Forum)…“

“If you don't take every reasonable action you can take, you may be considered an accomplice or enabler, and be brought to justice yourself, as if you were part of the criminal activity itself by acquiescence.”

http://www.paulstramer.net/2023/02/why-you-must-take-action-in-lawful.html

“Why the Offered Restitution Isn't Restitution ~ No More Taxation, Period..!”

 By Anna Von Reitz

Many people have received word from various sources that their share of the spoils collected from the guilty foreign governmental services corporations is $13,200,000…

This is incorrect… It's actually a lot more… That's just part of the "restitution" owed…

If you and everyone else were to receive this so-called restitution payment as "Federal Reserve Notes" it would be worthless or be made worthless in short order, because of the hyperinflation induced by that much cash value hitting the economy all at once…

The guilty parties could stand back and say, "See, we repaid you!" --- worthless paper, that is, and then your own stupidity spending it like drunken sailors would render it even more worthless…

“All that glitters is not gold..!”

The rest of their proposal stinks like an old outhouse, too…

A 14% "sales tax" on new purchases?  What for? 

There is enough money in the remaining Slush Funds to fund every aspect of public spending forevermore…

That's just a gratuitous charge to keep people believing in the "need" for taxation when there hasn't been any valid reason for taxation since 1941…

Enough already..!

And while they pretend that they are implementing the ‘NESARA’ that resulted from the efforts of… General Roy Schwasinger (and my Mother, by the way) they are instead implementing the "substitute" proposal deceptively abbreviated the same way…

There are two (2) x "NESARAs" ~ the ‘National Economic Security and Restoration Act’ is the actual ‘NESARA’, but there is also the ‘National Economic Stabilisation and Reform Act’ --- another doppelgänger… that they are trying to pass off the same way that they passed off "Confederate States" ~ that is, states-of-states, for actual States of the Union…

The actual ‘NESARA’… never included any taxation measures and doesn't provide for lump sum payouts of the kind these yahoos are trying to foist off…

So ~ buyer beware..!

If you accept their offered  $13,200,000… worth of paper, you sever your claim to your own land & home & names & other intellectual property, and allow them to settle their actual debt to you and yours for less than pennies on the dollar…

You & your children also tie yourselves to a 14% gratuity tax on everything you buy except "new purchases" ~ the big problem is that they still get to define what is taxable and what isn't..!

They can redefine "new" & "non-essential" and pretty soon you will be giving them 14% of everything including income from selling land & gold and anything else…

Don't forget you are both Buyers & Sellers and any burden of tax collection or payment that you place on others also falls on you..!

So, their version of "NESARA" just isn't good enough…!!!

It does nothing to return your stolen land and other property interests to you. It attempts to pay off debt owed to you with credit that is also owed to you…

It attempts to substitute a different "NESARA" for the one you are owed…

It guarantees the collapse of the Federal Reserve Note… due to hyperinflation, which would make any "restitution" based on it worthless in short order…

You'd be paying a million such "dollars" for a loaf of bread..!

So, wise up, Campers, and don't take any wooden nickels from British Flim-Flam artists..!

http://www.paulstramer.net/2023/02/why-offered-restitution-isnt.html?m=1

Reading between the lines we have 3 choices..!

1. Go with the ‘Deep State’… under ‘WEF’ (World Economic Forum) the Nazi’s that are pushing a version of ‘GESARA/NESARA’ where we… “own nothing & will be happy”… and there'll only be 500 million left people worldwide…!!!

2. Go with Trump (Controlled Opposition) who is pushing a version of ‘GESARA/NESARA’… where we will have loads of worthless currency via the QFS (Quantum Financial System) 14% tax etc… and we will end up… “owning nothing and be happy”… Where The… ‘Narcissistic Psychopathic Elite’s… will still control us all…!!!

3. Or Help build a world based on the people being the creditors, owning our own property, no taxes... & living a fantastic peaceful life…

Which sounds better to you…???

We control our own lives…!

This is a guide to assist you, knowing some specifics and with a clear understanding of what must be done and how to correctly challenge a claimant you shall be in a position standing as the beneficiary you are.

Equity follows the law.

This law is settled law of the land, common law…

As equity follows this, it is secondary to it, and comes into play if there is any discrepancy.

Equity can be heard in all courts since the Judicature Act 1873.

Section 25 of the Judicature Act: It was foreseen that a court which applied the rules of both common law & of equity… would face a conflict.

Where the common law rules would produce one result, and equity another.

Section 25 of the Judicature Act 1873 provided that if there was any conflict between these principles, then equity was to prevail…

Since there is a trust in play [of titles Three trust certainties diagram] there are two objects and two sets of rules, in essence; a beneficiary receives the benefits and a trustee is legally responsible…

Using specific legislation correctly, allows us to evidence that a claimant has no right to a claim (chose) because they are on the at law side of the trust, the ‘legal’ side as opposed to ‘equitable’ side where the beneficiary sits…

It stands to reason, that a claim cannot be brought against a beneficiary by a trustee or its agent…

Without a choice there is no claim…

Trustees & Agents cannot have a claim against a beneficiary.

Any attempt to claim is a breach of trust and restitution due to the beneficiary(s); (us)…

By asking pertinent questions, by way of a correctly formatted DSAR, no templates or letter, that an agent is legally charged to oblige, pursuant to specific legislation, we evidence the agent (acting for trustee) has no choice.

https://solutionsuneed.co.uk/an-introduction-to-using-equity

🔥 🔥🔥Very important lesson to be learned..! 🔥🔥🔥

Nothing will change for the better, unless we stand together and bring about that change we all desire… & deserve..!

Please share far & wide…

Very short 3 min video..!

‘Bills of Exchange / ‘Promissory Notes’

After in putting all relevant information & Data related to ‘Bills of Exchange’ & ‘Promissory Note’s.

This ‘Notice’ dealing with Bills of Exchange /Promissory Notes was generated by.

‘Anthropic’s ~ ‘Claude 3.5 Sonnet’ the newest most powerful AI assistant currently available for free.

Here is a draft comprehensive Notice based on the information provided:

-;-;-;-;-;-;-;-;-;-;-;-;-;

‘Notice Regarding Legal Status & Acceptance of Promissory Notes’:

[Your Name]
[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]

[Date]

[Recipient Name]
[Recipient Address]

Dear [Recipient],

Re: Legal Status & Mandatory Acceptance of Promissory Notes.

This Notice serves to inform you of the legal status of promissory notes under UK law and your obligations as a creditor to accept them as valid payment.

‘Legal Status of Promissory Notes’

Promissory notes are defined and governed by the Bills of Exchange Act 1882. Section 83(1) of the Act states:

"A promissory note is an unconditional promise in writing made by one person to another signed by the maker, engaging to pay, on demand or at a fixed or determinable future time, a sum certain in money, to, or to the order of, a specified person or to bearer."

Promissory notes are legally recognised as negotiable instruments and must be treated as cash. This principle has been affirmed by the highest courts in the UK:

In Fielding & Platt Ltd v Selim Najjar [1969] 1 W.L.R. 357, Lord Denning stated:

"We have repeatedly said in this court that a bill of exchange or a promissory note is to be treated as cash. It is to be honoured unless there is some good reason to the contrary."

This principle was earlier established in Jackson v Murphy [1887] 4 T.L.R. 92, where it was held that "a bill, cheque or note is given and taken in payment as so much cash, and not as merely given a right of action for the creditor to litigate a counterclaim."

‘Mandatory Acceptance of Promissory Notes’

As a creditor, you have a legal obligation to accept promissory notes as payment when properly tendered. This obligation stems from the following:

1. Bills of Exchange Act 1882, Section 52: "A bill of exchange is discharged by payment in due course by or on behalf of the drawee or acceptor."

2. Companies Act 2006, Section 52:
"A bill of exchange or promissory note is deemed to have been made, accepted or endorsed on behalf of a company if made, accepted or endorsed in the name of, or by or on behalf or on account of, the company by a person acting under its authority."

3. Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) 3-603 (as referenced in international commercial practice):
"If tender of payment of an obligation to pay an instrument is made to a person entitled to enforce the instrument, the effect of tender is governed by principles of law applicable to tender of payment under a simple contract."

Consequences of Non-Acceptance

Refusal to accept a properly tendered promissory note may have the following legal consequences:

1. Discharge of the underlying debt (Bills of Exchange Act 1882, Section 59)
2. Loss of right to claim interest after the due date (UCC 3-603(c))
3. Potential breach of contract and associated damages

Your Responsibilities

As a creditor, you are required to:

1. Accept promissory notes that meet the requirements outlined in the Bills of Exchange Act 1882
2. Treat promissory notes as cash, as per established case law
3. Process promissory notes in accordance with standard banking procedures

If you have concerns about the validity of a tendered promissory note, you must raise these concerns promptly and in good faith. Blanket refusals to accept promissory notes are not legally justifiable.

Please ensure that all relevant staff in your organisation are made aware of these legal obligations. Any future refusal to accept a properly tendered promissory note will be treated as a violation of UK law and may result in legal action.

If you require any clarification on the contents of this Notice, please contact me in writing within 7 days of receipt.

Yours sincerely,

[Your Name]

‘Notice’: ‘Bills of Exchange / Promissory Note’

‘No Corporate Jurisdiction Over The Natural Man’..!

Short 8 min video worth sharing gar & wide…

https://youtu.be/yDKKjE75-f0?si=_W8mbKKaAuktn6Xt