Is Silence Truly Acquiescence..?

Principles of contract law applicable to the three-step notary presentment process.

“A Handbook for Litigants in Person”..! Learn to use their own system against them..!

Decedent: a dead person: The decedent was given a proper burial.

Not to be confused with:
descendant – a person or animal that is descended from a specific ancestor; an offspring: a descendant of the early settlers

de·ce·dent  (dĭ-sēd′nt)
n. Law: A dead person.

[Latin dēcēdēns, dēcēdent-, present participle of dēcēdere, to depart, die; see decease.]

decedent (dɪˈsiːdənt)
n (Law) law chiefly US a deceased person [C16: from Latin dēcēdēns departing; see decease] Collins English Dictionary – Complete and Unabridged, 12th Edition 2014

de•ce•dent (dɪˈsid nt) n. Law.
a deceased person.
[1590–1600; < Latin dēcēdent-, s. of dēcēdēns, present participle of dēcēdere.

Thesaurus, Antonyms
Related Words; Synonyms

Noun
1. decedent - someone who is no longer alive; "I wonder what the dead person would have done"
dead person, dead soul, deceased, deceased person, departed
individual, mortal, person, somebody, someone, soul - a human being; "there was too much for one person to do"
dead - people who are no longer living; "they buried the dead" - infernal an inhabitant of Hell; "his roar made the infernals quake" living dead, zombie, zombi - a dead body that has been brought back to life by a supernatural force

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/decedent

Some of the Best Evidence of criminal activity spraying ChemTrails over Leeds, Yorkshire… UK…

Caught live on camera…

Combined with Flight Radar 24..! Caught Redhand..!

DID YOU CONSENT… to being sprayed with only God knows what; toxic chemical cocktail’s..???

C**NT’S..! 😡

Please share far & wide..!

This gentleman invokes constitutional law…

‘Bill of Rights’…!!!

listen to what the corrupt criminals do next…

Very short 5 min video. Worth watching…


https://youtu.be/QTx2RzFR-ss?si=E6GPbcaGfdmVrlMa

The Dangers of being… ‘Willfully Ignoran’t..!

Wilful ignorance is like wearing a blindfold while trying to navigate a minefield..!

Those who embrace it make decisions based on incomplete or distorted information, often suffering from cognitive dissonance and leading to consequences that ripple far beyond themselves…

They may dismiss real scientific consensus on critical issues like real public health or the hoax of climate change, putting not just themselves but entire communities at risk.

They might fall prey to false flag operations or manipulative ideologies that exploit their lack of knowledge, turning them against their own interests and those of others…

Perhaps most dangerously, the wilfully ignorant often don't recognise their own limitations – a phenomenon known as the Dunning-Kruger effect, where people with limited knowledge in a domain vastly overestimate their expertise…

This creates a destructive feedback loop: the less they know, the more confident they become in their misguided beliefs, and the more resistant they become to learning…

This resistance to new information and perspectives calcifies their worldview, making it increasingly difficult to adapt to new challenges or engage meaningfully with others who hold different views. ..

This ‘Notice of Liability’ has been generated to begin the process of placing these criminals on ‘Notice’ who continue to carry out the Globalist Plans for their New World Order and the domination of Mankind…

Please feel free to read, copy and share with any and all men & women who value and are fighting for our rights and freedoms…!!!

Get involved… and send a copy of this ‘Notice’ to your local MP & to the PRIME MINISTER…

Thousands if not tens of thousands of Notices landing on their doorstep should fire a warning shot across their bows to let them know… ‘We The People’ are onto their corrupt nefarious agenda…

If WE do NOT ACT… then WHO…???

OUTRAGEOUS…!!!

Criminal don’t always wear masks 😷 and hoodies..! 😏 Please share far & wide..!

Telephone Preference Service:

To combat unwanted unsolicited telephone calls to your mobile phone and landline.

What is TPS?
The Telephone Preference Service (TPS) is the UK’s only official ‘Do Not Call’ register for landline and mobile numbers. It allows people and businesses to opt out of unsolicited live sales and marketing calls.
It’s free and quick to register a telephone number.

Please share far and wide

https://www.tpsonline.org.uk

A Notice to your GP to prevent unwanted text messages and unsolicited nuisance phone calls re: vaccines… 💉


[Your Address]
[City, Postcode]

[Date]

[GP Practice Name]
[Practice Address]
[City, Postcode]

Dear Practice Manager,

Re: Communication Preferences and Data Protection Notice

I am writing to formally notify you that my mobile telephone and/or landline number is registered with the Telephone Preference Service (TPS) for the purpose of preventing unsolicited communications.

I hereby request that:

1. You immediately cease sending any unsolicited text messages or making unsolicited telephone calls to my registered mobile number.

2. You update my patient records to clearly reflect these communication preferences.

3. You only contact me by telephone or text message for essential medical purposes, such as appointment confirmations or urgent medical matters that I have explicitly consented to.

Please note that continued unsolicited communications would constitute a breach of:

- The Privacy and Electronic Communications Regulations (PECR)

- Data Protection Act 2018

- UK GDPR requirements

Should these breaches continue, I will have no choice but to:

1. File a formal complaint with the Information Commissioner's Office (ICO).

2. Seek appropriate legal remedies, including potential claims for damages under common law for any resulting harm or loss.

I trust you will respect this request and update your records accordingly. Please confirm receipt of this letter and the actions you have taken to implement these requirements.

Yours faithfully,

[Your Full Name]
[NHS Number if known]

"The Art of Being Nice: More Than Just Pleasantries"​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​​…

Being nice is often misunderstood as mere politeness or superficial pleasantries. In reality, genuine kindness is a powerful force that shapes relationships, communities, and ultimately, the very fabric of society.

It's a conscious choice that requires awareness, empathy, and consistent practice…

At its core, being nice encompasses several key elements:

Active Listening and Presence: True kindness begins with giving others our full attention. It means putting away our phones during conversations, maintaining eye contact, and truly absorbing what others are saying rather than simply waiting for our turn to speak.

When someone shares their thoughts or feelings, a nice person acknowledges them without immediately jumping to solutions or comparing them to their own experiences.

Empathy in Action:
Being nice requires stepping outside our own perspective to understand others' feelings and circumstances. This might mean recognizing that a colleague's sharp tone comes from personal struggles, or understanding that a stranger's rudeness may reflect their own bad day rather than any personal slight. Empathy transforms our interactions from transactional to meaningful.

Thoughtful Speech:
Kind people understand the weight of words. They choose language that uplifts rather than diminishes, that includes rather than excludes. This doesn't mean avoiding difficult conversations – rather, it means approaching them with care and consideration. A nice person delivers hard truths with compassion and constructive criticism with genuine desire to help.

Small Acts, Big Impact:
Kindness manifests in countless small ways: holding doors, offering seats to those who need them, remembering names, acknowledging birthdays, sending thank-you notes. These seemingly minor gestures create ripples of positivity that extend far beyond the immediate interaction. They show others they are seen and valued.

Boundaries and Self-Care:
Contrary to common misconception, being nice doesn't mean being a pushover. True kindness includes setting healthy boundaries and practicing self-care. After all, we can't pour from an empty cup. Nice people understand that saying "no" when necessary and maintaining personal limits actually enables them to be more genuinely kind when they do engage.

Forgiveness and Understanding:
Nice people practice forgiveness – both of others and themselves. They understand that everyone makes mistakes and deserves second chances. This doesn't mean accepting abuse or repeated bad behavior, but rather approaching human imperfection with grace and understanding.

Proactive Kindness:
Being nice isn't just about responding well to others – it's about actively creating positive situations. This might mean introducing people who could benefit from knowing each other, sharing opportunities, or stepping up to help before being asked. Nice people look for ways to make others' lives better, even in small ways.

The Ripple Effect:
Perhaps most importantly, being nice creates a positive feedback loop in communities. When we treat others with kindness, they're more likely to pass that kindness forward. Over time, this creates a more supportive, understanding, and pleasant environment for everyone. In an increasingly divided world, genuine niceness can be a powerful force for connection and healing.

In conclusion, being nice is a skill that requires practice, awareness, and genuine effort. It's not about maintaining a facade of pleasantness, but about contributing to a more compassionate world through conscious choices and actions. The beauty of kindness is that it benefits both the giver and receiver, creating connections and community in a world that desperately needs both.

Editors Comments: Being nice is akin to the fundamental components and principles of natural common law which are;

“Cause no harm or loss to another living man or woman; their rights and or their property.”

Peace to all men and women:
🌹 🐝 🌈 🕊️ ❤️

Our English Constitution & Trial By Jury Empower the People through Freedom from Tyranny.

The recent proposal by the Labour government to remove Jury Trials is further evidence of the state’s increasing control.

This will prevent the people from achieving self-governance and the right to make decisions about our justice and liberty.

If the people see the daily bombardment from the media of what the government has done wrong, what the medics have done wrong, what the police have done wrong, and what the monarch has done wrong, they will cry for the destruction of all these things and leave a dangerous void.

The solution is for every man, woman, and child to be educated about the power of our constitution and the power the people have to self-govern through Trial By Jury.

The government has been hiding our constitutional documents and national sovereignty, preventing us from achieving our right to self-govern.

Magna Carta 1215 gave the people the right to Trial By Jury, where twelve ordinary men and women from the community decide the case according to their conscience.

They can judge both the facts and the legislation and have the right to decide if the legislation under which the defendant was made guilty is fair.

The ability of the jury to decide if the legislation should apply in that case is known as Jury Nullification.

This means that the legislation can be selectively applied by the jury according to their conscience. All juries have this right, but they do not know because the Judges hide it from the people.

For example, if a man was driving to work during the lockdown and arrested by the Police under the Corona Virus Act he may end up with a fine. If that man requested his right to a Trial By Jury of twelve of his peers, they would have the right to decide his fate, not the judge. 

The jury could decide that restricting his right to travel and then fining him is against his unalienable right to trade and earn a living and say that the ‘Corona Virus Act’ was unfair and shouldn’t apply in this case. The man would walk free without fine or forfeiture..!

Our present system of Jury Trial is the bastardised version of our constitutional right. However, these juries do have the right to Jury Nullification of any Act or law. 

But this fact is hidden. The judge also manipulates the jury and ultimately makes the ruling, which is against our Constitution.

Since the 1970s law undergraduates have not been educated about the constitution, so the vast majority of judges, barristers, solicitors and Magistrates do not know that they are neglecting the rights of the people.

Universities caused them to write essays on the pros and cons of judge trials versus jury trials – as if this were a benign academic exercise rather than, perhaps, a manipulation of the psyches of prospective lawyers in order that they would come to unwittingly participate in the denigration of our constitution.

But many did graduate with a strong sense of justice and fought hard for it when in practice, despite the confines of the legal system in which they operated.  Many held the Jury in high esteem, but did not really understand why; they did not know that our constitution granted it to us as a right.

Many have been so busy surviving in the system that they did not stop to analyse it until the injustice of 2020 forced them to start uncovering the truth.

https://awakenedgb.wordpress.com/2024/12/14/the-english-constitution-empowers-the-people

Editor’s note: This site is well researched & contains a wealth of good information that empowers living men & women of all backgrounds…

THE TRUE NEW YEAR..!

We can all appreciate the kind sentiment and acknowledge the Good Wishes… & intentions that people send each other at this time of year…

However, how many know that this is actually inaccurate, therefore we must clarify that this channel does not endorse the perpetuation of inaccuracies… and blatant lies…

The term "octagon" refers to the number eight, indicating that October is the eighth month of the year. Similarly, "deca," from which December derives its name, corresponds to ten, establishing that December is indeed the tenth month.

Furthermore, January represents the 11th month, while February is the 12th.

From a historical and botanical perspective, the true new year aligns with the transition from February to March, coinciding with the onset of new growth and the blooming of life, marking the genuine start of the…

True New Year…!!!

The English Law of Liens

Extracts from Halsbury’s Laws of England, widely regarded within the legal profession as ‘the bible of English Law’.

701. Types. The concept of lien in the simple sense of a legal right to keep possession of property until a claim has been met and has been extended to cover a number of analogous rights. Liens are now variously described as legal, non-possessory, equitable, general, particular, statutory, contractual, judicial and subrogatory. Some of these may exist concurrently.

A lien arising by operation of law or equity and not contractual in its nature does not seem to fall within the definition of ‘security’ in the Consumer Credit Act 1974 but is included for the purposes of the Insolvency Act 1986.

702. Legal Lien. In its primary or legal sense ‘lien’ means a right at common law for a man to retain that which is rightfully and continuously in his possession belonging to another until the present and accrued claims of the person in possession are satisfied, but this is given by law and not by contract. A written agreement to grant a lien is not a bill of sale, for a legal lien does not as a rule arise until possession of the property is obtained. However, in exceptional cases, possession is no essential to constitute a legal lien.

703. Non-possessory Lien. In its secondary sense, ‘lien’ may be applied to a right subsisting in a person who has no possession of the property concerned but who nevertheless has a right against the owner analogous (similar) to a legal lien.

Such a right may arise in equity, by statute or under a court order.

Thus, a trustee has an equitable lien on the estate or fund for money properly expensed on it and a solicitor, in addition to his legal lien on the client’s documents in his possession, has a statutory lien right to ask the court to direct that property recovered is to stand security for his costs.

So also where a party has by his efforts brought into court a fund in the administration of which various parties are interested, his costs and expenses are a first claim on the fund; and a provisional liquidator’s remuneration and his solicitor’s expenses are charged on the funds of the liquidation so that the provisional liquidator has a lien over the company’s assets in his hands.

Likewise, a receiver or receiver and manager appointed by the court has an indemnity over assets and is a secured creditor with a lien for his expenses, remuneration and costs.

A trustee’s lien on the trust estate or fund for money properly expended on it seems to extend to the payment of costs of proceedings authorised by the court.

However, where a beneficiary or minority shareholder is entitled to a similar indeminity there can be no legal lien because there is no possession; and it is not clear whether an equitable or judicial lien could be said to arise in such a case, or whether such a proposition could have any useful effect.

A trustee’s equitable and statutory rights to impound a beneficiary’s interest, where the trustee has committed a breach of trust at the instigation of the beneficiary, do not depend on the trustee’s actual possession of the trust fund.

704. Equitable Liens. An equitable lien is a specie of equitable charge arising by operation of law independent of possession. Re Bond Worth Ltd [1980] Ch 228 at 250-251, [1985] 3 WLR 610 at 613-614 per Nourse J. A right which arises by express contractual agreement is sometimes described as a lien; see Re Bond Worth Ltd supra.

Although the vendor’s and the purchaser’s equitable liens arise in circumstances where there is a contract, a contract is not necessary for the creation of an equitable lien. Eg the trustee’s lien: see Shirlaw v Taylor (1991) 102 ALR 551 at 557, Aust Fed Ct, Full Ct.

Since it arises in equity, it is subject to all the usual conditions affecting equitable rights. Thus relief may be refused where the conduct of the person claiming the right has been questionable or improper.

__It is not possible to state a general principle which accounts for the diversity of situations in which an equitable lien arises. __Hewett v Court (1983) 149 CLR 639 at 645, Aust HC, per Gibbs CJ.

Apart from equitable liens arising from contractual dealings in property, equitable liens have been based upon general considerations of justice or upon the principle that he who seeks the aid of equity in enforcing some claim must admit the equitable rights of others associated with the subject matter. Shirlaw v Taylor (1991) 102 ALR 551 at 557-558, Aust Fed Ct, Full Ct.

The vendor’s lien is founded on the principle of equity that he who has obtained possession of property under a contract for payment of its value will not be allowed to keep it without payment. Where through the deposit of deeds and compliance with the statutory formalities, an equitable mortgage arises, there is a lien on the documents.

705. Concurrent Legal and Equitable Liens. Legal and equitable liens may both arise in the same transaction. Thus on the sale of land the vendor’s or purchaser’s equitable lien exists concurrently with a more limited legal lien before conveyance and a legal lien on the title deeds in the claimant’s possession; and it would also seem that a legal lien arising by statute on the sale of goods may exist concurrently with an equitable lien on the same goods. An equitable charge over a chattel can co-exist with a bailment of the chattel: Re Cosslett (Contractors) Ltd [1996] 4 All ER 46 at 61, [1996] 3 WLR 299 at 314 per Jonathan Parker J.

706. Statutory Lien. Where a lien arises by virtue of statute there will be different considerations from those raised by a common law or equitable lien, because the primary question will be the meaning of the statute; and it will not necessarily follow that the principles affecting a common law or equitable lien are intended by the statute to apply.

Statute law may also destroy or nullify a lien which would otherwise be enforcable.
An accountant’s lien in respect of unpaid fees over a client’s books of accounts, files and papers is unenforcable in so far as the existence of the lien conflicts with the requirement imposed by the Companies Act 1985 s 222 (as substituted) […] that a company’s accounting records must be kept at the company’s registered office or such other place as the director’s think fit, and must at all times be open to inspection by the company’s officers: DTC (CNC) Ltd v Gary Sargeant & Co (a firm) 2 All ER 369, [1996] 1 WLR 797.

It may not be clear whether the statute creates a general or a particular lien. __See eg Consumer Credit Act 1974 ss 70(2), 73(5); cf s 72(4). __An example of a statutory particular lien is that created in favour of the unpaid seller by the Sale of Goods Act 1979 [ss 39, 42, 43, 47, 48, 55].

707. Contractual Lien. Where a lien arises by contract there will usually be different considerations from those raised by a common law or equitable lien, because the primary question will be the meaning of the terms of the contract.

Contract has been said to supersede lien and to limit the rights of the person claiming under contract to those for which provision has been made in the contract. Walker v Birch (1795) 6 Term Rep 258; Re Leith’s Estate, Chambers v Davidson (1866) LR 1 PC 296; Fisher v Smith (1878) 4 App Cas 1, HL; Seka Pty Ltd (in provisional liquidation) v Fabric Dyeworks (Aust) Ltd (1991) 4 ACSR 455, Aust Fed Ct.
An example of a contractual lien is a security within the terms of the Consumer Credit Act 1974.

A contract which puports to create a general lien will be strictly construed. Squamish Terminals Ltd v Price-Waterhouse Ltd (1980).

Just as a contract may supersede the lien, so a course of dealing inconsistent with the lien may destroy it. Fisher v Smith (1878 4 App Cas 1, HL.

708. Subrogatory Lien.

A lien may arise by subrogation in equity where there is a primary and secondary liability of two persons for one and the same debt, the debt being (as between the two) that of one of those persons only, and not equally of both, so that the other, if he should be compelled to pay it, would be entitled to reimbursement from the person by whom (as between the two) it ought to have been paid. Duncan, Fox & Co v North and South Wales Bank (1880) 6 App Cas 1 at 10-11, HL. As to subrogation see also Orakpo v Manson Investments Ltd [1978] AC 95, [1977] 3 All ER 1, HL; Lord Napier and Ettrick v Hunter [1993] AC 713, [1993] 1 All ER 385, HL.

This right of subrogation arises independently of contract or guarantee and is equivalent to the right of contribution which exists in equity where a creditor has a right to come upon more than one person of fund for payment of the debt.

In such a case there is an equity between the persons interested in the different funds that each shall bear no more than due proportion. Deering v Earl of Winchelsea (1787) 2 Bos & P 270, Ex Ch; Stirling v Forrester (1821) 3 Bli 575.

That principle applies equally where ultimately one person is liable for the whole debt and the other is ultimately liable for none of it. The right of subrogation will only carry with it the right to a lien where the person primarily liable was subject to such a lien and not, for instance, where the original loan was clearly intended to be unsecured or where a trustee has no indemnity rights against the trust fund because its contract is unauthorised. Eclesiastical Comrs v Pinney [1900] 2 Ch 736 at 743, CA. Paul v Speinway Ltd (in liquidation) [1976] Ch 220 at 232, [1976] 2 All ER 587 at 597 per Oliver J (applying Wylie V Carlyon [1922] 1 ch 51. The ordinary and typical example of subrogation is that ‘where A’s money is used to pay off the claim of B, who is a second creditor, A is entitled to be regarded in equity as having had assignment to him of B’s rights as a secured creditor’: Burston Finance Ltd v Speirway Ltd [1974] 3 All ER 735 at 738 [1974] 1 WLR 1648 at 1652 per Walton J. This is similar to the statutory transfer of a mortgage, where the receipt for mortgage money indicates that payment has been made by some person not immediately entitled to the equity of redemption: see the Law of Property Act 1925 s 115(2) […] It has been held that ‘it is not open to doubt that where a third party pays off a mortgage he is presumed, until the contrary appears, to intend that the mortgage be kept alive for his own benefit. Ghana Commercial Bank v Chandiram [1960] AC 732 at 745, [1960] 2 All ER 865 at 871, PC.

COMPARISONS AND DISTINCTIONS
709. Distinctions. A lien must be distinguished from a mortgage, a pledge, a bill of sale and an equitable charge.

710. Legal Lien and Mortgage. A legal lien has been held to differ from a mortgage in that it is generally assignable without the express or implied authority of the owner of the subject goods. See 719 post; Tobin v Melrose [1951] SASR 139, S Aust SC. For departures from the supposed principle that a legal lien is not freely assignable see paras 708 ante, 719 post.

A mortgage, in comparison, can be transferred at the will of the mortgagee. See the Law of Property Act 1925 ss 114, 115(2); Taylor v Russell ’1892] AC 244 at 255, HL.

There is, however, authority for the rule that a legal lien can be acquired along with the secured debt itself. See Vered v Inscorp Holdings Ltd (1993) 31 NSWLR 290, NSW SC, per Hodgson J, following Bullv Faulkner (1848) 2 De G & SM 772.

A more substantial difference between legal lien and mortgage may be that, whereas a legal lien lasts only so long as possession of the goods is sustained, a mortgage does not depend on possession, and can arise or subsist without any delivery of possession to the mortgagee. The mortgagee may, however, be entitiled to possession: see Western Bank Ltd v Schindler [1977] Ch 1 at 9, [1976] 2 All ER 393 at 396, CA, per Buckley LJ.