‘Absolute Rights’

"As regards right to interfere with contractual obligations of another, 'absolute rights' which individual may exercise without reference to motive are rights incident to ownership of property, rights growing out of contractual relations, and right to enter or refuse to enter contractual relations.

"By the 'absolute rights' of individuals is meant those which are in their primary and strictest sense, such as would belong to them merely in a state of nature, and which every man & woman is entitled to enjoy, whether out of society or in it.

The rights of personal security, of personal liberty, and private property do not depend upon the Constitution for their existence. They existed before the Constitution was made, or the government was organised.

These are what are termed the 'absolute rights' of individuals, which belong to them independently of all government, and which all governments which derive their power from the consent of the governed were instituted to protect."

“Words & Phrases, Volume 1, 1968 West Publishing Company

ia902300.us.archive.org

Capitis Dimiutio - Status in Law
The following points stand as fact in law unless rebutted with evidence:

Roman Law Foundation: The principle of Capitis Diminutio as defined in Roman law remains applicable in modern legal systems, whereby the use of CAPITALISATION denotes a change in status (Blacks Law Dictionary, 4th Edition, page 1968).

Four Degrees of Status:
1. Capitis Dimutio Maxima (ALL CAPITALS: JOHN HENRY DOE) represents maximum loss of status
2. Capitis Dimutio Media (Mixed: John Henry DOE) represents medium loss of status
3. Capitis Dimutio Minima (Proper Case: John Henry Doe) represents minimal loss of status
4. Unicasus (lower case: john henry: of the family doe) represents no loss of status. unicasus (from "unus" meaning one + "casus" meaning case)

The Case Law That Cages Legal Fictions:

1. Gasque v Inland Revenue Commissioners [1940] 2 KB 80 - Established that legal fictions created by statute have limited application and cannot extend beyond their statutory purpose and must be strictly limited to their statutory purpose. Lord Justice Lawrence held: "The fiction must be limited to the purpose for which it was created and cannot be extended beyond its proper statutory bounds."

Brief Summary: Mr Gasque, a US citizen residing in England, challenged the Inland Revenue's attempt to extend statutory definitions beyond their intended scope. The Revenue tried to apply broad interpretations of statutory terms to capture more taxpayers. The Court rejected this, establishing that when statutes create legal fictions (like deeming someone a "resident" for tax purposes), these fictions must be strictly limited to their specific statutory purpose and cannot be extended by implication or presumption.

2. Why This Matters & Protects i:
* Birth registration creates a legal fiction for RECORDING births
* It CANNOT be extended to create surety obligations
* No statute says birth registration makes you liable for the fiction
* Implications and presumptions are FORBIDDEN

1. The Statutory Challenge: "Show me the EXACT statute that says birth registration creates surety obligations. Gasque forbids implications."

2. This principle was reaffirmed in Marshall v Kerr [1995] 1 AC 148, where even tax fictions couldn't be extended beyond their specific purpose. Birth Registration serves to record births - it cannot be extended to create surety obligations without explicit statutory authority, which does not exist.

The Roman Law Foundation - The Name & Status Distinction
The following points stand as fact in law unless rebutted with evidence:

1. Capitis Diminutio - The Hidden Name Game: According to Black's Law Dictionary (4th Edition) and Roman law principles. The Romans knew changing how a name is written changes legal status. Capitalisation of names indicates legal status through the doctrine of Capitis Diminutio.

1. Names in all capitals represent maximum status loss - effectively slavery status.

2.This reveals why legal documents address ‘JOHN DOE’ (fiction) rather than ‘john of the family doe’ (living man).
a) JOHN HENRY DOE (Maxima) = Maximum status loss (slave)
b) John H DOE (Media) = Medium status loss
c) John Henry Doe (Minima) = Minimal status change
d) john henry: doe (Unicasus) = No status lost. unicasus (from "unus" meaning one + "casus" meaning case)

‘Parking Tickets are unenforceable’…

The assertion that parking tickets are unenforceable, being categorised as contractual and civil rather than criminal matters, has been brought to light through a correspondence from a Member of Parliament (MP) to a constituent. This correspondence has led to discussions regarding the potential for drivers across the nation to legally disregard parking restrictions, according to remarks made by a leading traffic attorney, Nick Freeman, widely known as "Mr. Loophole."

Mr. Freeman posits that all drivers need to do when parking in council-operated car parks or on public roads with established parking regulations is to display a clearly visible sign within their vehicle, communicating that they are parking illegally and do not intend to enter into a contractual agreement.

The context for Mr. Freeman's comments stems from a letter written by Bromsgrove MP Sajid Javid, who was inquired by a constituent about the penalties being issued to individuals residing in caravans at a car park on Stourbridge Road. Mr. Javid, now positioned in a newly appointed Cabinet role following a recent reshuffle, explained in his correspondence:

"There appears to be some confusion regarding the basis upon which the individuals were situated in the car park in question. The standard understanding for typical users of the car park is that, by entering and parking their vehicle, they engage in a contractual agreement with the Council, which requires them to remit a payment in exchange for the ability to leave their vehicle for a defined duration. Should the vehicle exceed the paid duration, remain unpaid, or fail to comply with parking regulations, this constitutes a breach of contract, thereby entitling the Council to impose a penalty charge.

Conversely, in the case of the individuals residing in caravans, their presence in the car park can be deemed as illegal occupation, and thus, there exists no contractual relationship with them, as their occupation was without permission. Under these circumstances, the more appropriate response is not one of breach of contract but rather one concerning illegal occupation."

Mr Freeman commented further, stating, "If the situation is as described, then motorists using public car parks, where fees are enforced, may rightfully place a notice on their vehicle stating: 'I am parked here illegally, I am not entering into a contract, and I do not accept your terms and conditions.' From a legal standpoint, the authority may find itself constrained due to the lack of an agreement that establishes a contract.”

He added, “It is imperative that the motorist clearly indicates that he or she does not wish to enter into any contractual obligation, whether expressed or implied, and therefore does not consent to any terms and conditions, with the notice being prominently displayed."

“A Short Constitutional History of England” ~ PDF

@everyone

In the forthcoming days, weeks, and months, we will be uploading an extensive collection of literature & PDF books centred on legal & lawful principles & practices, and relevant pertinent critical issues, that have been gathered over several years…

Our objective is to furnish you with resources that will enhance your understanding and empower you in the ongoing endeavor to address the corruption that pervades our judicial system and has done for centuries…

It is imperative to recognise that the system itself is not inherently flawed; rather, the integrity & honour of certain individuals operating within it, is compromised…

Therefore, to effectively combat this corruption and ensure accountability among these individuals, it is essential to acquire a comprehensive understanding of the very ‘Acts and Statutes’… they utilise—the same mechanisms and frameworks that are employed against us as living men & women.

A very useful and insightful document… a short read however it’s packed with very useful links & information…! Please share far & wide…!

Another very useful and practical document… packed with very useful links & information…! Please share far & wide…!

The title speaks for itself, only six pages, but very insightful… make up your own mind…

Letter of Clarity by David Robinson - Original Founder of ‘Lawful Dissent’ ~ October 20, 2016
·
Good evening constittuional protectors...

This is a (not so) brief explanation of why the remedy we use works, or has worked for us in the past.

Thanks to the committee of the barons for invoking article 61 of Magna Carta 1215, we have a lawful, peaceful remedy to tackle the injustices of the state in a peaceful manner, we don't take to the streets.

We Only deal with evidential facts and nothing more and we ONLY use English constitutional tenets in our arguments.

This is because anyone who opposing our standing will also be opposing the English Constitution which is tantamount to TREASON AT COMMON LAW. By the way...Blair did NOT legally repeal the 1795 Treasonable and Seditious practices Act when he brought in the Crime and disorder Act in 1998 (Chapter 36) like the imposters within government say. Of course, naturally you will need to check that constitutional law (common law) is a higher jurisdiction in the realm than the corporate rules being flung about by imposters and crooks within the establishment today, to be confident with the law to use it properly.

Please don't just believe what we state check it all out for yourselves but remember, the internet is awash with disinformation, just search for English constitution and see how many posts say that 'Britain' doesn't have one.

The argument they use is almost laughable, they say that we don't have a written, codified constitution like the USA (who incidentally took their constitution from ours) when evidently we DO have a written constitution that (has a system of protocols) is codified. It was created by the people over hundreds of years through revolutions and tyrannical regimes before this one. The constitution, when being fully observed supplies a good system of application of itself, therefore it is 'codified'.

The law… ‘IS OF THE PEOPLE’...which is why we are policed by consent in England. We all surely consent to the constitution as it protects the people and ensures justice is seen to be done. Unlike today in their corporate arenas, where deception and unaware peoples is a profitable practice indeed..

So... to the point. The regime works on presumption, they presume that you consent (and indeed you do if you comply with a summons of your own free will, or ignore their notices and letters). They presume that you are the corporate body and that you understand legalese and stand under their presumed (illegal) authority.

We remove all presumptions and provide evidence of article 61's invocation (Daily Telegraph report) plus other evidence (which can be seen in some of the processes we have succeeded with, in the files).

We state that we do not consent as the law FORBIDS us to do so at this time. We conditionally accept all demands on proof that they have the authority to make those demands since ‘Article 61's… invocation. The crown has NO authority whatsoever so neither do the so called courts, policy enforcers, councils etc.

‘Article 61’… is a royal command, it is commanded that we distress the Crown and the illegal regime by seizing castles, land etc, we all have LAWFUL: EXCUSE to do this and distress the regime in any way we see fit peacefully though, whilst also enjoying the freedom that 'duress of circumstances' provides us. Under duress you can comply with the regime if you rely on a car or whatever for example do not de-register the car or tax on it... you are also entitled to all your entitlements, it would be theft and coercion to aid and abet a treasonous regime to deny you them.

So... we go after every individual as a man/woman who makes any demands on us. We must compel them to stand under ‘Article 61’ too by law... everyone has the duty to do that whilst in lawful rebellion... this is apart of its strategy... only a united people can defeat treason from within. Unify under the common law which is common sense and just, is all we need to do.

Honour is very important in law so we must always provide an opportunity to cure (to make good, if they ignore the conditional acceptance Notice)…

By putting someone on Notice of an evidentai fact (Treason - Article 61) whilst serving the notice by recorded post and retaining a copy and postal receipt, once delivered and signed for it is deemed to have been accepted under the law, therefore if they ignore it they will have tacitly agreed to it. If they reply and do not refer to your claims, then they agree by lack of substance (documented evidence of ‘Article 61’ not being in effect today) or, they may denounce the constitution which is the crime of sedition if done publicly.

So.. we are creating a case file for our defence and educating the unawares also. We conditionally accept a hearing if summonsed but ONLY in a 'properly convened court de jure'...(court with a trial by jury, standing under common law) ~ (constitutional law).

There are NO courts of law in Britain today as they all derive their presumed authority from the Crown (Corporation), which is not in any position of authority since ‘Article 61’ was invoked, and are all corporate which is not a SERVICE…

Britain is supposed to be a system of service to the sovereign people, we are all sovereign because we are all equal. Even the monarch is in service to the people by Oath and contract (Coronation Oath)...

This is a check mate move as we find that nobody will commit high treason against us. Once we serve the misprision of treason Notice on them they cannot deny knowing of the crime, which we all have a duty to report to a justice of the peace. If they do not report the crime of treason then they are guilty of misprision of treason (to know of an act of treason being planned ot committed and not to report the crime then you are also guilty of the crime). I attempted to report treason back in 2010 in Devizes Wiltshire.

TREASON... to hand over the authority of a nation without the expressed consent of the people, or without first being beaten in open battle.

The reason why ‘Article 61’ was invoked was because QEII ratified the treasonous treaty of Nice (France)... and NO we are not out of the EU and we cannot escape it by using ‘Article 50’ of the treasonous Lisbon treaty. That would be granting the illegal imposters in Westminster authority and the EU legislation too, which has no authority over the British nor commonwealth nations.

Finally... the entire English speaking commonwealth nations ALL have a duty to stand under ‘Article 61’.

When we unite we will not only change Britain and the commonwealth back to a just system of service but you can be sure it would go global also. We will be able to bring the untouchable (like BLAIR) to justice as well as the banksters etc and have a constitutional convention of the people to bring the constitution up to scratch.

I hope this provides a little more comprehension to this remedy we use. Peace.

Common Law Assent - the Pushback

“What is Your Name”…? The Name on Your Birth Certificate is… “HEARSAY”..!

Very Short 2 minute Video Clip…

Please share far and wide..!

“ if you don’t fit in fuck off”..!

You got to love his passion..! 😆

Please share far & wide… SAY NO to DIGITAL ID’s… !!!

‘IMPORTANT INFORMATION’: ~ What you can and cannot be arrested for:

Section 17 of the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE) permits warrantless entry ONLY for:

1. Arrest for an indictable offence: Indictable offences are: Murder; Manslaughter; Rape; Robbery; Burglary; GBH; Drug trafficking; Serious Fraud

2. Preventing serious harm to life or property

3. Recapturing someone unlawfully at large

Driving a car with an unusual number plate is not a crime.

What is NOT indictable:

1. Non payment of council tax
2. TV license evasion
3. Minor traffic offences
4. Public order offences under section 5 (low level abusive words or behaviour likely to cause harassment, alarm or distress)
5. Utility or Water bill arrears

Disclaimer: this does not constitute legal advice.

Threats of imprisonment by enforcement agents (bailiffs) who are not officers of the Crown or the court are legally baseless and potentially criminal.

Report to the Police

If an enforcement agent is:

Threatening imprisonment

Using intimidation or harassment

Ignoring the presence of vulnerable individuals (e.g., disabled men & women and or a child)

You should report them to the police. The relevant laws may include:

Offence Law Description
•Harassment Protection from Harassment Act 1997

•Repeated threatening or intimidating behaviour

•Malicious Communications
~ Malicious Communications Act 1988

•Threats or distressing messages

•Fraud by False
Representation ~ Fraud Act 2006: Claiming powers they do not have (e.g., pretending to be court officers).

Public Order Offences

Public Order Act 1986 •Threatening, abusive, or insulting behaviour

This is also an interesting route that will stop the bus:

https://www.lgo.org.uk/make-a-complaint/fact-sheets/benefits-and-tax/bailiffs

*’THE DIGITAL ID CARD’*

*This article was written by Frances Stonor Saunders and is the former arts editor of The New Statesman, author of The Cultural Cold War, Diabolical Englishman and The Devil's Broker and was awarded the Royal Historical Society's William Gladstone Memorial Prize. She lives in London.*

"You may have heard that legislation creating compulsory ID Cards passed a crucial stage in the House of Commons. You may feel that ID cards are not something to worry about, since we already have Photo ID for our Passport and Driving License and an ID Card will be no different to that.

What you have not been told is the full scope of this proposed ID Card, and what it will mean to you personally.

The proposed ID Card will be different from any card you now hold. It will be connected to a database called the NIR (National Identity Register) where all of your personal details will be stored. This will include the unique number that will be issued to you, your fingerprints, a scan of the back of your eye, and your photograph.

Your name, address and date birth will also obviously be stored there.

There will be spaces on this database for your religion, residence status, and many other private and personal facts about you. There is unlimited space for every other details of your life on the NIR database, which can be expanded by the Government with or without further Acts of Parliament.

By itself, you might think that this register is harmless, but you would be wrong to come to this conclusion. This new card will be used to check your identity against your entry in the register in real time, whenever you present it to 'prove who you are'.

Every place that sells alcohol or cigarettes, every post office, every pharmacy, and every Bank will have an NIR Card Terminal, (very much like the Chip and Pin Readers that are everywhere now) into which your card can be 'swiped' to check your identity.

Each time this happens, a record is made at the NIR of the time and place that the Card was presented.

This means for example, that there will be a government record of every time you withdraw more than £99 at your branch of NatWest, who now demand ID for these transactions. Every time you have to prove who you are, your card will be swiped, and a record made at the NIR.

Restaurants and off licenses will demand that your card is swiped so that each receipt shows that they sold alcohol to someone over 18, and that this was proved by the access to the NIR, indemnifying them from prosecution.

Private businesses are going to be given access to the NIR Database. If you want to apply for a job, you will have to present your card for a swipe.

If you want to apply for a London Underground Oyster Card, or a supermarket loyalty card, or a driving license you will have to present your ID Card for a swipe. The same goes for getting a telephone line or a mobile phone or an internet account.
Oyster, DVLA, BT and Nectar (for example) all run very detailed databases of their own. They will be allowed access to the NIR, just as every other business will be.

This means that each of these entities will be able to store your unique number in their database, and place all your travel, phone records, driving activities and detailed shopping habits under your unique NIR number.

These databases, which can easily fit on a storage device the size of your hand, will be sold to third parties either legally or illegally. It will then be possible for a non-governmental entity to create a detailed dossier of all your activities.

Certainly, the government will have clandestine access to all of them, meaning that they will have a complete record of all your movements, from how much and when you withdraw from your bank account to what medications you are taking, down to the level of what sort of bread you eat - all accessible via a single unique number in a Central database.

This is quite a significant leap from a simple ID Card that shows your name and face. Most people do not know that this is the true character and scope of the proposed ID Card.

Whenever the details of how it will work are explained to them, they quickly change from being ambivalent towards it.

The Government is going to COMPEL you to enter your details into the NIR and to carry this card. If you and your children want to obtain or renew your passports, you will be forced to have your fingerprints taken your eyes scanned for the NIR, and an ID Card will be issued to you whether you want one or not. If you refuse to be fingerprinted and eye scanned, you will not be able to get a passport.

Your ID Card will, just like your passport, not be your property. The Home Secretary will have the right to revoke or suspend your ID at any time, meaning that you will not be able to withdraw money from your Bank Account, for example, or do anything that requires you to present your government issued ID Card.

The arguments that have been put forwarded in favour of ID Cards can be easily disproved. ID Cards WILL NOT stop terrorists; every Spaniard a has compulsory ID Card as did the Madrid Bombers.

ID Cards will not 'eliminate benefit fraud', which in comparison, is small compared to the astronomical cost of this proposal, which will be measured in billions according to the LSE (London School of Economics).

This scheme exists solely to exert total surveillance and control over the ordinary free British Citizen, and it will line the pockets of the companies that will create the computer systems at the expense of your freedom, privacy and money.

If you did not know the full scope of the proposed ID Card Scheme before and you are as unsettled as I am at what it really means to you, to this country and its way of life, I urge you to email or give it to your friends and colleagues and everyone else you think should know and who cares.

The Bill has proceeded to this stage due to the lack of accurate and complete information on this proposal being made public.

Together & hand in hand, we can inform the entire nation if everyone who receives this passes it on.”

PLEASE SHARE FAR & WIDE with EVERYONE YOU KNOW..!

“Together We Are Stronger”..!

‘The Digital ID Card’…
& the Deeper Insidious Implications..! PDF

Please Share This with Everyone You Know..! Via social media; email anyway you think is appropriate..!

We Need to Stop This Dead in its Tracks or We Can Kiss Goodbye to Privacy & Freedom..!