Forwarded from 2008 361 White Paper- WP (@RamonQuesada)
The Parallel History Of Bitcoin. - ALTCOIN MAGAZINE
- Medium
Donald Mulders
Jun 16 · 2019
https://medium.com/altcoin-magazine/the-parallel-history-of-bitcoin-bc4c1d348939
"Dave Kleiman (*28) became a law enforcement officer after his service in the US Army. Later he worked in computer forensics expert. (*29) If you look up his credentials and certifications in this field, they are very impressive. The list of accomplishments is long! Dave (*30) could also be found on the Cryptography mailing list, but he clearly had different ideas (*31) than the Cypherpunks as we can see from his public performances. (*32)"
If you look into their works you’ll see that Craig and Dave definitely didn’t fit in with most of the other people on the cypherpunk list. They were definitely not hackers, they were anti-hackers. Because most will not believe any of it I’ll provide some of their proof-of-work available for all the see."
28 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=2682943
29 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dn6q0dGrHRY
30 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ForkipJu05c
31 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEVVpK4hL4g
32 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkN4Qr4uz4w
- Medium
Donald Mulders
Jun 16 · 2019
https://medium.com/altcoin-magazine/the-parallel-history-of-bitcoin-bc4c1d348939
"Dave Kleiman (*28) became a law enforcement officer after his service in the US Army. Later he worked in computer forensics expert. (*29) If you look up his credentials and certifications in this field, they are very impressive. The list of accomplishments is long! Dave (*30) could also be found on the Cryptography mailing list, but he clearly had different ideas (*31) than the Cypherpunks as we can see from his public performances. (*32)"
If you look into their works you’ll see that Craig and Dave definitely didn’t fit in with most of the other people on the cypherpunk list. They were definitely not hackers, they were anti-hackers. Because most will not believe any of it I’ll provide some of their proof-of-work available for all the see."
28 https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/cf_dev/AbsByAuth.cfm?per_id=2682943
29 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dn6q0dGrHRY
30 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ForkipJu05c
31 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TEVVpK4hL4g
32 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jkN4Qr4uz4w
Medium
The Parallel History Of BitCoin.
A story that connects dots between people and events from 10 years of BitCoin. Once you’ve read this story, it can no longer be unseen.
@CSW_Satoshi
@CSW_Academic
@CSW_Articles
@CSW_Books
@CSW_Business
@Craig_Wright
@CSW_Cybersecurity
@CSW_Ideology
@CSW_interviews
@CSW_interviewsVideos
@CSW_Legal
@CSW_Personal
@CSW_Religion
@CSW_VideoTalks
@CSW_Patent
@CSW_Economics
@theArtofBitcoin
@TheSatoshiAfaire
@DaveKleiman
@GavinAndresen1
@RayDillinger
@GeorgeGilder
@IanGrigg
@MikeHearn
@Jimmy_Nguyen
@CalvinAyre
@DavidRees
@Hal_Finney
@CSW_Academic
@CSW_Articles
@CSW_Books
@CSW_Business
@Craig_Wright
@CSW_Cybersecurity
@CSW_Ideology
@CSW_interviews
@CSW_interviewsVideos
@CSW_Legal
@CSW_Personal
@CSW_Religion
@CSW_VideoTalks
@CSW_Patent
@CSW_Economics
@theArtofBitcoin
@TheSatoshiAfaire
@DaveKleiman
@GavinAndresen1
@RayDillinger
@GeorgeGilder
@IanGrigg
@MikeHearn
@Jimmy_Nguyen
@CalvinAyre
@DavidRees
@Hal_Finney
The Cryptography Mailing List
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at metzdowd.com
From dave at davekleiman.com Tue Jan 20 19:18:39 2009
From: dave at davekleiman.com (Dave Kleiman)
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:18:39 -0500
Subject: [heise online UK] Secure deletion: a single overwrite will do it
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0901202201210.4359@pl2.zayda.com>
References: <49745164.4050003@secorvo.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0901202201210.4359@pl2.zayda.com>
Message-ID: <00f201c97b5d$d13f4790$73bdd6b0$@com>
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Stefan Kelm wrote:
> ...it has to be overwritten completely, sector
> by sector. Although this takes time, it costs nothing: the dd command in
> any Linux distribution will do the job perfectly.
Note quite perfectly, and not nearly as fast as the built-in option (see below).
On Mon, 20 Jan 2009, Jason wrote:
>I agree in general, although you still have to watch out for "reserve tracks"
>(search on this page)....."All hard disks have reserved sectors, which are used automatically by the
>drive logic if there is a defect in the media.":
Yes the main areas you are referring to are known as the P-List (Primary Defects List ? manufacture defect info that does not change) G-List (Grown Defects Lists ? sector relocation table). You can only access the P-List with special commands and tools.
However, you can wipe the G-List are if you do it outside of an OS (or a tool that can access the system area), since the OS knows nothing of these sectors. The easiest (possible the best because of speed) way to accomplish this in modern ATA hard drives (2001 forward) is with the built-in Secure Erase program. Conveniently placed there for us by Recording Research (CMRR) headed by Gordon Hughes, Associate Director of CMRR, USSD on the Secure Erase Initiative.
""At the ANSI T-13 Committee meeting in 2004, Gordon described the differences between block erase as described in government document DoD2550 and Secure Erase. Unlike block level erase Secure Erase also overwrites reassigned blocks and can be up to eight times faster (per CMRR tests).
In addition the enhanced SE command qualifies for Federal Government secret data classification erasure.""
You can download a DOS-based utility HDDerase that securely erases all data on ATA hard disk drives via the internal secure erase command. http://cmrr.ucsd.edu/people/Hughes/SecureErase.shtml
And yes, I am the same Dave Kleiman from the paper.
https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2009-January.txt
Unsubscribe by sending "unsubscribe cryptography" to majordomo at metzdowd.com
From dave at davekleiman.com Tue Jan 20 19:18:39 2009
From: dave at davekleiman.com (Dave Kleiman)
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:18:39 -0500
Subject: [heise online UK] Secure deletion: a single overwrite will do it
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0901202201210.4359@pl2.zayda.com>
References: <49745164.4050003@secorvo.de> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0901202201210.4359@pl2.zayda.com>
Message-ID: <00f201c97b5d$d13f4790$73bdd6b0$@com>
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009, Stefan Kelm wrote:
> ...it has to be overwritten completely, sector
> by sector. Although this takes time, it costs nothing: the dd command in
> any Linux distribution will do the job perfectly.
Note quite perfectly, and not nearly as fast as the built-in option (see below).
On Mon, 20 Jan 2009, Jason wrote:
>I agree in general, although you still have to watch out for "reserve tracks"
>(search on this page)....."All hard disks have reserved sectors, which are used automatically by the
>drive logic if there is a defect in the media.":
Yes the main areas you are referring to are known as the P-List (Primary Defects List ? manufacture defect info that does not change) G-List (Grown Defects Lists ? sector relocation table). You can only access the P-List with special commands and tools.
However, you can wipe the G-List are if you do it outside of an OS (or a tool that can access the system area), since the OS knows nothing of these sectors. The easiest (possible the best because of speed) way to accomplish this in modern ATA hard drives (2001 forward) is with the built-in Secure Erase program. Conveniently placed there for us by Recording Research (CMRR) headed by Gordon Hughes, Associate Director of CMRR, USSD on the Secure Erase Initiative.
""At the ANSI T-13 Committee meeting in 2004, Gordon described the differences between block erase as described in government document DoD2550 and Secure Erase. Unlike block level erase Secure Erase also overwrites reassigned blocks and can be up to eight times faster (per CMRR tests).
In addition the enhanced SE command qualifies for Federal Government secret data classification erasure.""
You can download a DOS-based utility HDDerase that securely erases all data on ATA hard disk drives via the internal secure erase command. http://cmrr.ucsd.edu/people/Hughes/SecureErase.shtml
And yes, I am the same Dave Kleiman from the paper.
https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2009-January.txt
-----Original Message-----
From: Craig Wright [mailto:cwright@bdosyd.com.au]
Sent: 23 February 2006 21:10
To: dave kleiman; Darren W Miller
Cc: Al Sutton; defendingthenet
Subject: RE: Why Easy To Use Software Is Putting You At Risk
Hello,
Dave stated; "Craig.. And be gentle Craig will pick apart opinions and bring back \
factual information without batting an eye."
True and I am always open to being proved wrong. The thing is that I have to be \
PROVED Wrong. Opinion and anecdotal evidence is not proof. Validated points and \
correctly collected statistical data are.
https://marc.info/?l=security-basics&m=114080882901616&w=2
From: Craig Wright [mailto:cwright@bdosyd.com.au]
Sent: 23 February 2006 21:10
To: dave kleiman; Darren W Miller
Cc: Al Sutton; defendingthenet
Subject: RE: Why Easy To Use Software Is Putting You At Risk
Hello,
Dave stated; "Craig.. And be gentle Craig will pick apart opinions and bring back \
factual information without batting an eye."
True and I am always open to being proved wrong. The thing is that I have to be \
PROVED Wrong. Opinion and anecdotal evidence is not proof. Validated points and \
correctly collected statistical data are.
https://marc.info/?l=security-basics&m=114080882901616&w=2
RE: Forensic/Cyber Crime Investigator
From: "Craig Wright" <cwright () bdosyd com au>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:43:08 +1100
Hi Dave,
It is true that there are cases/incidents that go to court (even virus infections). These are statistically the
anecdotal case is just the exception. In fact if 1% of all corporate (even excluding personal incidents) incidents
involving virus incidents alone where to go to court, the court system would fold.
https://seclists.org/basics/2006/Feb/155
From: "Craig Wright" <cwright () bdosyd com au>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 09:43:08 +1100
Hi Dave,
It is true that there are cases/incidents that go to court (even virus infections). These are statistically the
anecdotal case is just the exception. In fact if 1% of all corporate (even excluding personal incidents) incidents
involving virus incidents alone where to go to court, the court system would fold.
https://seclists.org/basics/2006/Feb/155
seclists.org
Security Basics: RE: Forensic/Cyber Crime Investigator
fw-wiz] HTML Emails and Firewall Security
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/pipermail/firewall-wizards/2003-August/015188.html
dave kleiman dave@netmedic.net
Sun Aug 3 10:47:03 2003
Previous message: [fw-wiz] HTML Emails and Firewall Security
Next message: [fw-wiz] Gartner on "Deep Packet Inspection"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
You could always utilize the NOHTML.DLL in any Outlook client =
(2000,2002)
etc.
_____________________
Dave Kleiman
dave@netmedic.net
www.netmedic.net
https://listserv.icsalabs.com/pipermail/firewall-wizards/2003-August/015188.html
dave kleiman dave@netmedic.net
Sun Aug 3 10:47:03 2003
Previous message: [fw-wiz] HTML Emails and Firewall Security
Next message: [fw-wiz] Gartner on "Deep Packet Inspection"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
You could always utilize the NOHTML.DLL in any Outlook client =
(2000,2002)
etc.
_____________________
Dave Kleiman
dave@netmedic.net
www.netmedic.net
Solving password problems one at a time, Re: The password-reset paradox
https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2009-February/015181.html
Dave Kleiman dave at davekleiman.com
Mon Feb 23 13:41:45 EST 2009
>> On February 21, 2009 14:34, Ed Gerck wrote:
>> In a business, one must write down the passwords and one must have a
>> duplicate copy of it, with further backup, where management can access
>> it. This is SOP.
>>
>> This is done not just in case the proverbial truck hits the employee, or
>> fire strikes the building, or for the disgruntled cases, but because
>> people do forget and a company cannot be at the same time responsible to
>> the shareholders for its daily operations and not be responsible for the
>> passwords that pretty much define how those daily operations are run.
The idea that people should not write their passwords is thus silly from
the security viewpoint of assuring availability and also for another
reason. Users cannot be trusted to follow instructions. So, if one's
security depends on their users following instructions, then something
is wrong from the start.
Most organizations I interact with have an SOP that nobody should ever know another's password. The only passwords that are safe stored are those for encryption or the top level admin. You take on a degree of legal responsibility if you have the ability to logon as another user. Since the admin can easily change a user's password, what would be the necessity for this risk? All password changes should be audited.
Respectfully,
Dave Kleiman - http://www.ComputerForensicExaminer.com
4371 Northlake Blvd #314
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
561.310.8801
https://www.metzdowd.com/pipermail/cryptography/2009-February/015181.html
Dave Kleiman dave at davekleiman.com
Mon Feb 23 13:41:45 EST 2009
>> On February 21, 2009 14:34, Ed Gerck wrote:
>> In a business, one must write down the passwords and one must have a
>> duplicate copy of it, with further backup, where management can access
>> it. This is SOP.
>>
>> This is done not just in case the proverbial truck hits the employee, or
>> fire strikes the building, or for the disgruntled cases, but because
>> people do forget and a company cannot be at the same time responsible to
>> the shareholders for its daily operations and not be responsible for the
>> passwords that pretty much define how those daily operations are run.
The idea that people should not write their passwords is thus silly from
the security viewpoint of assuring availability and also for another
reason. Users cannot be trusted to follow instructions. So, if one's
security depends on their users following instructions, then something
is wrong from the start.
Most organizations I interact with have an SOP that nobody should ever know another's password. The only passwords that are safe stored are those for encryption or the top level admin. You take on a degree of legal responsibility if you have the ability to logon as another user. Since the admin can easily change a user's password, what would be the necessity for this risk? All password changes should be audited.
Respectfully,
Dave Kleiman - http://www.ComputerForensicExaminer.com
4371 Northlake Blvd #314
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
561.310.8801
RE: Defamation and the diffculties of law on the Internet.
From: "dave kleiman" <dave () davekleiman com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:25:13 -0400
https://seclists.org/basics/2008/Mar/147
Hats off to you Craig,
Sometimes you amaze me....I literally today just took on a case today
dealing exactly with this, you are making my life easy as I am gathering
(with your permission) this information you have provided for my client's
review.
When this becomes public record, I will post-up the results.
I will take any more information on this subject with great enthusiasm and
appreciation, as always!!!
By the way, for those of you who have never asked for Craig's help, you do
not know what you are missing.
I have asked his research assistance more than once. One particular time it
was dealing with abilities of cookies on the server side, when I awoke the
next morning, I had 100's of pages and links of information on that subject,
and variations and ideas I had not even or forgotten to consider (e.g. web
bugs). Why did he help, for no other than reason than he just likes to
research information, and possibly considers me a friend from afar. He
probably had as much fun reading up on the subject as did.
And along with all the technical details he included this:
Cookie Recipe Ingredients:
125 grams butter
50 grams caster sugar
60 grams brown sugar
1 large egg
1 teaspoon vanilla essence/extract
125 grams of plain flour
1/2 teaspoon salt
1/2 teaspoon bicarbonate of soda
250 grams of chocolate (Dark is best for this)
1/2 cup coarsely chopped almonds
Method: Turn your oven on to preheat at 180 degrees Celsius (about 350
degrees Fahrenheit, gas mark 4). Remember to take your grill pan out first.
Now get some baking trays ready (if they're not non-stick then you better
line them or grease them)......................Hey Presto! The world's BEST
cookies, in the comfort of your own home.
In the midst of this data exchange I casually mentioned that one day, when I
was in the position to not have to work so much, I would return to school
and my dream degrees in Cosmology and Astrophysics. Of course, the next day
I had links to every online study available for those degrees, with a "why
wait wink."
Further, it amazes me how Craig has a Blog helping to understand the rights
of US based Digital Forensic Examiners:
http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com/2008/01/texas-pi-fud.html
And he is based in AU. He simply cares enough about the cause and the
industry to help, it has no direct affect on him if US DFEs are required to
have PI licenses!!
People of the past considered "Loons":
(Feynman, Hawking, Sagan, da Vinci, Einstein, Columbus, everyone associated
with Monty Python and the Holy Grail:
Black Knight: Right, I'll do you for that!
King Arthur: You'll what?
Black Knight: Come here!
King Arthur: What are you gonna do, bleed on me?
Black Knight: I'm invincible!
King Arthur: ...You're a loony.
.......you get the picture)
Yep Craig is a Junkie; a Knowledge Junkie!!!!
For those of you who have nothing good to say; why say anything?
Dave
Respectfully,
Dave Kleiman - http://www.davekleiman.com
4371 Northlake Blvd #314
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
561.310.8801
From: "dave kleiman" <dave () davekleiman com>
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 03:25:13 -0400
https://seclists.org/basics/2008/Mar/147
Hats off to you Craig,
Sometimes you amaze me....I literally today just took on a case today
dealing exactly with this, you are making my life easy as I am gathering
(with your permission) this information you have provided for my client's
review.
When this becomes public record, I will post-up the results.
I will take any more information on this subject with great enthusiasm and
appreciation, as always!!!
By the way, for those of you who have never asked for Craig's help, you do
not know what you are missing.
I have asked his research assistance more than once. One particular time it
was dealing with abilities of cookies on the server side, when I awoke the
next morning, I had 100's of pages and links of information on that subject,
and variations and ideas I had not even or forgotten to consider (e.g. web
bugs). Why did he help, for no other than reason than he just likes to
research information, and possibly considers me a friend from afar. He
probably had as much fun reading up on the subject as did.
And along with all the technical details he included this:
Cookie Recipe Ingredients:
125 grams butter
50 grams caster sugar
60 grams brown sugar
1 large egg
1 teaspoon vanilla essence/extract
125 grams of plain flour
1/2 teaspoon salt
1/2 teaspoon bicarbonate of soda
250 grams of chocolate (Dark is best for this)
1/2 cup coarsely chopped almonds
Method: Turn your oven on to preheat at 180 degrees Celsius (about 350
degrees Fahrenheit, gas mark 4). Remember to take your grill pan out first.
Now get some baking trays ready (if they're not non-stick then you better
line them or grease them)......................Hey Presto! The world's BEST
cookies, in the comfort of your own home.
In the midst of this data exchange I casually mentioned that one day, when I
was in the position to not have to work so much, I would return to school
and my dream degrees in Cosmology and Astrophysics. Of course, the next day
I had links to every online study available for those degrees, with a "why
wait wink."
Further, it amazes me how Craig has a Blog helping to understand the rights
of US based Digital Forensic Examiners:
http://gse-compliance.blogspot.com/2008/01/texas-pi-fud.html
And he is based in AU. He simply cares enough about the cause and the
industry to help, it has no direct affect on him if US DFEs are required to
have PI licenses!!
People of the past considered "Loons":
(Feynman, Hawking, Sagan, da Vinci, Einstein, Columbus, everyone associated
with Monty Python and the Holy Grail:
Black Knight: Right, I'll do you for that!
King Arthur: You'll what?
Black Knight: Come here!
King Arthur: What are you gonna do, bleed on me?
Black Knight: I'm invincible!
King Arthur: ...You're a loony.
.......you get the picture)
Yep Craig is a Junkie; a Knowledge Junkie!!!!
For those of you who have nothing good to say; why say anything?
Dave
Respectfully,
Dave Kleiman - http://www.davekleiman.com
4371 Northlake Blvd #314
Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33410
561.310.8801
seclists.org
Security Basics: RE: Defamation and the diffculties of law on the Internet.
401 Dave Kleiman 2013 pinned «https://telegra.ph/Compilation-of-396-Craig-Wrights-Post--Papers-2019-11-21-11-21»
2003-08-11
Dave Kleiman posts on The Cryptography Mailing List
Director of IT Security, North Wales, PA
https://marc.info/?l=security-jobs&m=106061946710645&w=2
Dave Kleiman posts on The Cryptography Mailing List
Director of IT Security, North Wales, PA
https://marc.info/?l=security-jobs&m=106061946710645&w=2
2003-07-24
All Dave Kleiman posts on The Cryptography Mailing List
Authors
https://marc.info/?w=2&r=1&s=Dave+Kleiman&q=a
All Dave Kleiman posts on The Cryptography Mailing List
Authors
https://marc.info/?w=2&r=1&s=Dave+Kleiman&q=a
From: "dave kleiman" <dave () netmedic ! net>
Date: 2003-09-23 23:49:10
[Download RAW message or body]
Hey all,
I would like to announce the release off our free tool,
Securit-e-PortControl.
This is a lightened version of one tool that comes as part of our
Securit-e-Lok tool suite.
The tool is available for download at
http://www.securit-e-doc.com/products/securitelok.asp
Click on free downloads. There is no form to fill out, and we will not
collect your e-mail addy's or attempt to send marketing material to you.
Please feel free to give me your thoughts and comments on it.
Please send all your comments to me at this e-mail address not my
Securit-e-Doc address.
Thanks
Chief Information Security Officer
Securit-e-Doc, Inc.
515 N. Flagler Dr. Suite 203
WPB, FL 33401
561.833.2303 x121 Fax: 561.833.0132
Dave Kleiman posts on The Cryptography Mailing List
https://marc.info/?l=sectools&m=106442592530989&w=2
Date: 2003-09-23 23:49:10
[Download RAW message or body]
Hey all,
I would like to announce the release off our free tool,
Securit-e-PortControl.
This is a lightened version of one tool that comes as part of our
Securit-e-Lok tool suite.
The tool is available for download at
http://www.securit-e-doc.com/products/securitelok.asp
Click on free downloads. There is no form to fill out, and we will not
collect your e-mail addy's or attempt to send marketing material to you.
Please feel free to give me your thoughts and comments on it.
Please send all your comments to me at this e-mail address not my
Securit-e-Doc address.
Thanks
Chief Information Security Officer
Securit-e-Doc, Inc.
515 N. Flagler Dr. Suite 203
WPB, FL 33401
561.833.2303 x121 Fax: 561.833.0132
Dave Kleiman posts on The Cryptography Mailing List
https://marc.info/?l=sectools&m=106442592530989&w=2
Subject: The FBI's InfraGard 2005 National Conference
From: "dave kleiman" <dave () isecureu ! com>
Date: 2005-07-13 11:17:20
The conference will be held on August 9, 10 & 11 in Washington DC at the JW
Marriott at 1331 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC.
http://www.infragardconferences.com
Dave Kleiman posts on The Cryptography Mailing List
https://marc.info/?l=webappsec&m=112126185712230&w=2
From: "dave kleiman" <dave () isecureu ! com>
Date: 2005-07-13 11:17:20
The conference will be held on August 9, 10 & 11 in Washington DC at the JW
Marriott at 1331 Pennsylvania Ave, Washington DC.
http://www.infragardconferences.com
Dave Kleiman posts on The Cryptography Mailing List
https://marc.info/?l=webappsec&m=112126185712230&w=2
Subject: RE: Peter Gutmann data deletion theaory?
From: "dave kleiman" <dave () isecureu ! com>
Date: 2005-07-24 19:30:30
Dave Kleiman posts on The Cryptography Mailing List
https://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=112251165318070&w=2
From: "dave kleiman" <dave () isecureu ! com>
Date: 2005-07-24 19:30:30
Dave Kleiman posts on The Cryptography Mailing List
https://marc.info/?l=bugtraq&m=112251165318070&w=2
Subject: RE: The ugly side of using disk encryption
From: "dave kleiman" <dave () davekleiman ! com>
Date: 2006-10-23 16:29:53
Dave Kleiman posts on The Cryptography Mailing List
https://marc.info/?l=security-basics&m=116165137207757&w=2
From: "dave kleiman" <dave () davekleiman ! com>
Date: 2006-10-23 16:29:53
Dave Kleiman posts on The Cryptography Mailing List
https://marc.info/?l=security-basics&m=116165137207757&w=2
Subject: CyberCrime Summit
From: "dave kleiman" <dave () davekleiman ! com>
Date: 2007-03-17 15:13:28
Message-ID: 01b701c768a6$d2c8e6f0$7ad4a8c0 () a1
[Download RAW message or body]
Mar. 19 - 23, 2007
CyberCrime Institute
3333 George Busbee Drive
Kennesaw, GA 30144
http://www.cybercrimesummit.com/schedule/SCHEDULE.HTM
Respectfully,
Dave Kleiman
Dave Kleiman posts on The Cryptography Mailing List
https://marc.info/?l=forensics&m=117433686823711&w=2
From: "dave kleiman" <dave () davekleiman ! com>
Date: 2007-03-17 15:13:28
Message-ID: 01b701c768a6$d2c8e6f0$7ad4a8c0 () a1
[Download RAW message or body]
Mar. 19 - 23, 2007
CyberCrime Institute
3333 George Busbee Drive
Kennesaw, GA 30144
http://www.cybercrimesummit.com/schedule/SCHEDULE.HTM
Respectfully,
Dave Kleiman
Dave Kleiman posts on The Cryptography Mailing List
https://marc.info/?l=forensics&m=117433686823711&w=2