Bitchute
https://www.bitchute.com/video/jM0mqkoJmyxj/

Meryl Nass MD: “How do the Powers That Be hide adverse vaccine effects? Myocarditis as a prime example” Symposium II held on December 10, 2021 by Doctors for COVID Ethics, hosted by UK Column. https://doctors4covidethics.org/replay-gold-standard-covid-science-in-practice-interdisciplinary-symposium-ii-december-10-2021/

Merry Christmas!
Happy Holidays!
With Warm regards!

WOW DR. CHARLES HOFFE DELIVERS A DOSE OF REALITY YOU CAN’T AFFORD TO MISS!!!

The very idea of wanting to "vaccinate" those who have recovered is completely absurd. This was confirmed, once again, in the Letter to the Editor of the New England Journal of Medicine of 23.12.21: "Severity of SARS-CoV-2 Reinfections as Compared with Primary Infections".

In Qatar, 4 reinfections requiring hospitalisation, 0 reinfections requiring intensive care and 0 deaths among reinfected persons occurred in 353 326 naturally immunised persons within one year.

It is extremely unlikely that this barely existing risk for a severe course of naturally immunised persons can be further reduced by mRNA or DNA injections and would also be bought by the much higher risk of severe side effects of the unnecessary, ineffective, unsafe serial experimental mRNA and DNA injections.

https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMc2108120

Immunology 101 Q&A
One of our subscribers asked very good questions.
1. Is sIgA measurable post natural infection (no vaccine) as a reliable measurement of immunity?

I would expect a high titer of sIgA to strongly correlate with clinical immunity, but I have not seen any study that looked at it rigorously.

2. Is sIgA a serum measurement or a mucosal measurement?

It should be done on the mucosa. It's not routinely done, though, because it is not necessary. We are not doing it for influenza or for any other respiratory viruses. We don't even bother to routinely identify any of those viruses in most manifestly ill patients - we treat colds and bronchitis as a fact of life, and we focus on treating those who develop pneumonia or worse. COVID is just not any more severe than influenza, and it does not deserve all this extra attention.

3. Why are those people who had a natural infection from SARS COV-2 getting reinfected with the Omicron variant?

We tend to get reinfected every so often with the same respiratory viruses, because minor, local infections of the respiratory tract do not leave behind very strong, long-lasting immunity. Overall, the number of Omicron reinfections is not high, though; and we must also consider that there are lot of false-positive PCR tests. I wouldn't be surprised if most "reinfected" patients had a false-positive test the first or the second time around.

4. How is this variant escaping naturally acquired immunity?

Not very well. But all viruses mutate in order to escape immunity; that is why there are so many different strains. Every acknowledged strain of any virus started its career as a "variant." Again, with the other viruses, we don't bother with all of those, or at least we don't trouble and scare the public with them.

If you had real COVID once, with significant systemic symptoms (fever for several days etc.), then you will not get it again. Some variant or other might manage to replicate in your upper respiratory tract and perhaps give you the sniffles, but that will be it.

COVID is boring. The agenda that is hiding behind it is much more important.

Overall, the study by Abu-Raddad et al. confirms that natural immunity can be relied upon to protect the populace from severe recurrent COVID-19 disease, and that vaccination is unnecessary.
Even in the control group the infection fatality rate was only about 0.12%. This overall remarkably low number can be ascribed to cross-immunity conferred by regular respiratory coronavirus strains.
https://doctors4covidethics.org/naturally-acquired-immunity-protects-from-severe-covid-upon-reinfection-statistical-evidence-from-quatar/

Happy New Year!

There are two videos in the post.
The first one is the full interview.
The second one is a presentation on mRNA vaccine toxicity, which focused on the autopsy findings from vaccine victims which was recently published by Dr. Burkhardt and Dr. Bhakdi.
https://doctors4covidethics.org/on-mrna-vaccine-toxicity-and-the-political-agenda-behind-vaccine-passports/

First, do no harm!

The futility already known from our medical training and the far-reaching ineffectiveness and intense uncertainty of the experimental mRNA and DNA injections already known from the approval studies have meanwhile been impressively confirmed in the real world.

While so-called experts claim to this very day, unmolested by health authorities, media and prosecutors, that, after inection, the lipid nano particles remain in the deltoid muscle, we know from pharmacokinetic studies that they are found in the blood within 15 minutes and in all tissues within hours. The mRNA is translated in an unconrolled manner locally and quantitatively - effective dose of spike protein unknown and varying widely interindividually - into spike protein in theoretically all cell types. These cells are then eliminated by the immune system.

This can lead to vasculitis and thrombosis in large vessels (e.g. myocardial infarction, cerebral stroke and pulmonary embolism), diffusely in small vessels (determine D-dimer and perform fundoscopy / OCT laser! ), autoimmune-like inflammation of theoretically all organs (e.g. myocarditis), induction of immunosuppression with reactivation of herpes zoster, EB and CM viruses, autoimmune diseases and tumour progression and induction. The same applies in principle to vector vaccines.

Canadian Covid Care Alliance explains in this video and text the unscientific nature of Pfizer's Comirnaty fraudulent approval and safety data and why it is unscientific, unethical and unlawful to inject it into people, first and foremost into children.

Doctors for COVID Ethics have summarised the scientific basis of the unnecessary, ineffective, unsafe serial experimental mRNA and DNA injections, which has now been (histo)pathologically confirmed, e.g. here.