The attack on all of the other uses are proposed during dates until when I was still there and they attacked my proposals.

You can see this back in 2010:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2162.msg28321#msg28321

Amongst others, Jeff Garzik claims that non-current use of the bitcoin block chain is an attack:
Please start your own block chain, rather than forking the network like this.
I hope it is clear the havoc that your push to include non-currency data is causing.

You'll see Gavin's point later in the thread. You wonder why I got sick of working with these people.

I discussed this in 2010.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=195.msg1611#msg1611
In this, I have noted all of the different types of applications that can be built. Yet, people keep telling me how my system is meant to run.

CSW
Nov 20, 2020
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1605870949348900?thread_ts=1605870949.348900&cid=C5131HKFX

I don't know if you know, but one of the things Gavin was tasked to do when I left was to integrate some of this but I have been talking about here and have it working correctly. To get the alert key to be more than just Satoshi signs

In 2011, the first thing that happened to do this was the protocol proposition called OP_EVAL

This proposed opcode should never of happened but I wasn't watching, it was likely not applied but it was problematic.

The reason for this is that it would have allowed an easy methodology for users to recover bitcoin even when backups had been lost. Services could be added to the system that would be analogous to bank like alerts that would point out attacks or double spends all fraud and theft.

I had told Gavin it was possible but he still tried to add a new opcode to do it

Some guy called Russell O'Connor ended up findiing the problems and it ended

one CPU one vote does not mean one person one vote

an individual computer does not have one CPU

in 2011, the system had already amalgamated itself into three pools that control 50% of the global hash

I thought this was a good thing, I thought I could leave the system at that point even with the bs that was happening and Gavin trying to add opcodes and concentrate Orne my issues facing the tax office - which by the I won

The scenario was the first hash war and it is where Mr Maxwell managed to skew things and play both sides

I never counted for Mr Maxwell

CSW
Feb 10, 2021
https://metanet-icu.slack.com/archives/C5131HKFX/p1612984483200200?thread_ts=1612984483.200200&cid=C5131HKFX

Making Money- Gavin Andresen @ Ignite Amherst https://archive.org/details/am-Making_Money-_Gavin_Andresen_at_Ignite_Amherst

This Week in Startups 140 https://archive.org/details/TWiST-E140

In 2014, Vitalik, Adam Back, Gavin, Mike Hearn, G Maxwell, P Todd on Turing complete language vs non-Turing complete (Ethereum vs Bitcoin)

https://t.co/62ZMcPasvL

https://t.co/y3bTA4u7Dy

2010-12-09 02:11:23 <gavinandresen> jgarzik: so do you like the idea of allowing an extra 32 arbitrary bytes in transactions?

334 2010-12-09 02:11:48 redMBA has quit (Ping timeout: 260 seconds)

335 2010-12-09 02:11:51 <gavinandresen> ... cause without that I don't think bitcoin is a distributed timestamped notary service for small data

336 2010-12-09 02:11:54 <jgarzik> gavinandresen: grudgingly

https://buildingbitcoin.org/bitcoin-dev/log-2010-12-09.html#l-274

I found this today and I couldn't believe it

"7. Satoshi Removed His Name from the Bitcoin Software Before Leaving.

Finally, a last interesting find was that Satoshi did formally “quit” Bitcoin, removing his name from the copyright claim in the software and leaving the code to all “Bitcoin developers.” "

10 Years Ago Today, Bitcoin Creator Satoshi Nakamoto Sent His Final Message.
Pete Rizzo
Apr 26, 2021,12:30pm EDT
|1,026,250 views

https://www-forbes-com.cdn.ampproject.org/c/s/www.forbes.com/sites/peterizzo/2021/04/26/10-years-ago-today-bitcoin-creator-satoshi-nakamoto-sent-his-final-message/amp/