From: Gavin Andresen
<gavinandresen@gm...> -
2011-09-23 16:31:38
Bitcoin version 0.4.0 is now available for download at:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.4.0/
The main feature in this release is wallet private key encryption;
you can set a passphrase that must be entered before sending coins.
See below for more information; if you decide to encrypt your wallet,
WRITE DOWN YOUR PASSPHRASE AND PUT IT IN A SECURE LOCATION. If you
forget or lose your wallet passphrase, you lose your bitcoins.
Previous versions of bitcoin are unable to read encrypted wallets,
and will crash on startup if the wallet is encrypted.
Also note: bitcoin version 0.4 uses a newer version of Berkeley DB
(bdb version 4.8) than previous versions (bdb 4.7). If you upgrade
to version 0.4 and then revert back to an earlier version of bitcoin
the it may be unable to start because bdb 4.7 cannot read bdb 4.8
"log" files.
https://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/bitcoin-list/?viewmonth=201109
<gavinandresen@gm...> -
2011-09-23 16:31:38
Bitcoin version 0.4.0 is now available for download at:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.4.0/
The main feature in this release is wallet private key encryption;
you can set a passphrase that must be entered before sending coins.
See below for more information; if you decide to encrypt your wallet,
WRITE DOWN YOUR PASSPHRASE AND PUT IT IN A SECURE LOCATION. If you
forget or lose your wallet passphrase, you lose your bitcoins.
Previous versions of bitcoin are unable to read encrypted wallets,
and will crash on startup if the wallet is encrypted.
Also note: bitcoin version 0.4 uses a newer version of Berkeley DB
(bdb version 4.8) than previous versions (bdb 4.7). If you upgrade
to version 0.4 and then revert back to an earlier version of bitcoin
the it may be unable to start because bdb 4.7 cannot read bdb 4.8
"log" files.
https://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/bitcoin-list/?viewmonth=201109
Re: [bitcoin-list]
Bitcoin-Qt and bitcoind version 0.5 released
On 21 November 2011 21:57,
Gavin Andresen
<gavinandresen@...>
wrote:
> Bitcoin version 0.5.0 is now available for download at:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.5.0/
> The major change for this release is a completely new
> graphicalinterface that uses the Qt user interface toolkit.
> This release include German, Spanish, Spanish-Castilian, Norwegianand
> Dutch translations. More translations are welcome; join theproject at
> Transifex if you can help:
> https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/bitcoin/
> Please report bugs using the issue tracker at github:
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues
> If you cannot or do not want to run Bitcoin-Qt, a bug-fix-only
> Bitcoin version 0.4.1 is also available at sourceforge.
https://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/bitcoin-list/?viewmonth=201111
Bitcoin-Qt and bitcoind version 0.5 released
On 21 November 2011 21:57,
Gavin Andresen
<gavinandresen@...>
wrote:
> Bitcoin version 0.5.0 is now available for download at:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.5.0/
> The major change for this release is a completely new
> graphicalinterface that uses the Qt user interface toolkit.
> This release include German, Spanish, Spanish-Castilian, Norwegianand
> Dutch translations. More translations are welcome; join theproject at
> Transifex if you can help:
> https://www.transifex.net/projects/p/bitcoin/
> Please report bugs using the issue tracker at github:
> https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues
> If you cannot or do not want to run Bitcoin-Qt, a bug-fix-only
> Bitcoin version 0.4.1 is also available at sourceforge.
https://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/bitcoin-list/?viewmonth=201111
From: Gavin Andresen
<gavinandresen@gm...> -
2012-05-14 17:10:02
CVE-2012-2459: Critical Vulnerability
A denial-of-service vulnerability that affects all versions of
bitcoind and Bitcoin-Qt has been reported and fixed. An attacker
could isolate a victim's node and cause the creation of blockchain
forks.
Because this bug could be exploited to severely disrupt the Bitcoin
network we consider this a critical vulnerability, and encourage
everybody to upgrade to the latest version: 0.6.2.
Backports for older releases (0.5.5 and 0.4.6) are also available if
you cannot upgrade to version 0.6.2.
Full technical details are being withheld to give people the
opportunity to upgrade.
Thanks to Forrest Voight for discovering and reporting the vulnerability.
https://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/bitcoin-list/?viewmonth=201205
<gavinandresen@gm...> -
2012-05-14 17:10:02
CVE-2012-2459: Critical Vulnerability
A denial-of-service vulnerability that affects all versions of
bitcoind and Bitcoin-Qt has been reported and fixed. An attacker
could isolate a victim's node and cause the creation of blockchain
forks.
Because this bug could be exploited to severely disrupt the Bitcoin
network we consider this a critical vulnerability, and encourage
everybody to upgrade to the latest version: 0.6.2.
Backports for older releases (0.5.5 and 0.4.6) are also available if
you cannot upgrade to version 0.6.2.
Full technical details are being withheld to give people the
opportunity to upgrade.
Thanks to Forrest Voight for discovering and reporting the vulnerability.
https://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/bitcoin-list/?viewmonth=201205
From: Gavin Andresen
<gavinandresen@gm...> -
2012-05-08 23:57:21
Bitcoin version 0.6.2 is now available for download at:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.6.2/
This is a bug-fix and code-cleanup release, with no major new features.
NOTABLE CHANGES
===============
Much faster shutdowns. However, the blkindex.dat file is no longer
portable to different data directories by default. If you need a
portable blkindex.dat file then run with the new -detachdb=1 option
or the "Detach databases at shutdown" GUI preference.
Fixed https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/1065, a bug that
could cause long-running nodes to crash.
Mac and Windows binaries are compiled against OpenSSL 1.0.1b (Linux
binaries are dynamically linked to the version of OpenSSL on the system).
Thanks to everybody who contributed to this release:
Chris Moore
Dwayne C. Litzenberger
Gavin Andresen
Jeff Garzik
Luke Dashjr
Matt Corallo
Philip Kaufmann
Pieter Wuille
R E Broadley
Timothy Redaelli
Wladimir J. van der Laan
cardpuncher
freewil
graingert
sje397
https://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/bitcoin-list/?viewmonth=201205
<gavinandresen@gm...> -
2012-05-08 23:57:21
Bitcoin version 0.6.2 is now available for download at:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/bitcoin/files/Bitcoin/bitcoin-0.6.2/
This is a bug-fix and code-cleanup release, with no major new features.
NOTABLE CHANGES
===============
Much faster shutdowns. However, the blkindex.dat file is no longer
portable to different data directories by default. If you need a
portable blkindex.dat file then run with the new -detachdb=1 option
or the "Detach databases at shutdown" GUI preference.
Fixed https://github.com/bitcoin/bitcoin/issues/1065, a bug that
could cause long-running nodes to crash.
Mac and Windows binaries are compiled against OpenSSL 1.0.1b (Linux
binaries are dynamically linked to the version of OpenSSL on the system).
Thanks to everybody who contributed to this release:
Chris Moore
Dwayne C. Litzenberger
Gavin Andresen
Jeff Garzik
Luke Dashjr
Matt Corallo
Philip Kaufmann
Pieter Wuille
R E Broadley
Timothy Redaelli
Wladimir J. van der Laan
cardpuncher
freewil
graingert
sje397
https://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/bitcoin-list/?viewmonth=201205
From: Gavin Andresen
<gavinandresen@gm...> -
2011-04-18 16:19:59
Hey y'all:
I put the Reason.TV folks in touch with Jerry Brito (he already knows
them); I think Jerry will be a really good person to talk about "big
picture Bitcoin" stuff. I did a Surprisingly Free podcast with him
that will be out tomorrow ( http://surprisinglyfree.com/ )
Gavin Andresen
http://clearcoin.com/
https://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/bitcoin-press/?viewmonth=201104
<gavinandresen@gm...> -
2011-04-18 16:19:59
Hey y'all:
I put the Reason.TV folks in touch with Jerry Brito (he already knows
them); I think Jerry will be a really good person to talk about "big
picture Bitcoin" stuff. I did a Surprisingly Free podcast with him
that will be out tomorrow ( http://surprisinglyfree.com/ )
Gavin Andresen
http://clearcoin.com/
https://sourceforge.net/p/bitcoin/mailman/bitcoin-press/?viewmonth=201104
Surprisingly Free | Insights and Advice From The Best
Surprisingly Free is a site that shares insight from industry leaders across the globe. Come and learn from the very best!
Forwarded from 436 Bitcoin BIP (@RamonQuesada)
diawiki
----------------------------------------------------------
109 Consensus (hard fork)
Two million byte size limit with sigop and sighash limits
Gavin Andresen
Standard
Rejected
BIP: 109
Layer: Consensus (hard fork)
Title: Two million byte size limit with sigop and sighash limits
Author: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Comments-Summary: No comments yet.
Comments-URI: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/wiki/Comments:BIP-0109
Status: Rejected
Type: Standards Track
Created: 2016-01-28
License: PD
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0109.mediawiki
--------------------------------------------------------------
BIP: 112
Layer: Consensus (soft fork)
Title: CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY
Author: BtcDrak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>
Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
Comments-Summary: No comments yet.
Comments-URI: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/wiki/Comments:BIP-0112
Status: Final
Type: Standards Track
Created: 2015-08-10
License: PD
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0112.mediawiki
----------------------------------------------------------
109 Consensus (hard fork)
Two million byte size limit with sigop and sighash limits
Gavin Andresen
Standard
Rejected
BIP: 109
Layer: Consensus (hard fork)
Title: Two million byte size limit with sigop and sighash limits
Author: Gavin Andresen <gavinandresen@gmail.com>
Comments-Summary: No comments yet.
Comments-URI: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/wiki/Comments:BIP-0109
Status: Rejected
Type: Standards Track
Created: 2016-01-28
License: PD
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0109.mediawiki
--------------------------------------------------------------
BIP: 112
Layer: Consensus (soft fork)
Title: CHECKSEQUENCEVERIFY
Author: BtcDrak <btcdrak@gmail.com>
Mark Friedenbach <mark@friedenbach.org>
Eric Lombrozo <elombrozo@gmail.com>
Comments-Summary: No comments yet.
Comments-URI: https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/wiki/Comments:BIP-0112
Status: Final
Type: Standards Track
Created: 2015-08-10
License: PD
https://github.com/bitcoin/bips/blob/master/bip-0112.mediawiki
GitHub
bitcoin/bips
Bitcoin Improvement Proposals. Contribute to bitcoin/bips development by creating an account on GitHub.
Gavin will visit the CIA
April 27, 2011, 07:00:26 PM
Merited by OgNasty (1), coolcoinz (1)
#1
I want to get this out in the open because it is the kind of thing that will generate conspiracy theories: I'm going to give a presentation about Bitcoin at CIA headquarters in June at an emerging technologies conference for the US intelligence community.
I accepted the invitation to speak because the fact that I was invited means Bitcoin is already on their radar, and I think it might be a good chance to talk about why I think Bitcoin will make the world a better place. I think the goals of this project are to create a better currency, create a more competitive and efficient international payment system, and give people more direct control over their finances. And I don't think any of those goals are incompatible with the goals of government.
I'm only very slightly worried that talking about bitcoin at the CIA will increase the chances they'll try to do something we don't want them to do. I think accepting their invitation and being open about exactly what bitcoin is will make it less likely they'll see it as a threat.
PS: Full disclosure: I'll be paid a one-time fee of $3,000 to cover expenses and pay me for my time. I don't want any "Gavin is on the CIA's payroll" rumors to get started, either...
As always, comments and questions and discussion welcome. I'd really rather not hear any conspiracy theories about how they'll secretly implant a mind-control chip in my head while I'm there, though.... https://bitcointalk.org/?topic=6652.0
April 27, 2011, 07:00:26 PM
Merited by OgNasty (1), coolcoinz (1)
#1
I want to get this out in the open because it is the kind of thing that will generate conspiracy theories: I'm going to give a presentation about Bitcoin at CIA headquarters in June at an emerging technologies conference for the US intelligence community.
I accepted the invitation to speak because the fact that I was invited means Bitcoin is already on their radar, and I think it might be a good chance to talk about why I think Bitcoin will make the world a better place. I think the goals of this project are to create a better currency, create a more competitive and efficient international payment system, and give people more direct control over their finances. And I don't think any of those goals are incompatible with the goals of government.
I'm only very slightly worried that talking about bitcoin at the CIA will increase the chances they'll try to do something we don't want them to do. I think accepting their invitation and being open about exactly what bitcoin is will make it less likely they'll see it as a threat.
PS: Full disclosure: I'll be paid a one-time fee of $3,000 to cover expenses and pay me for my time. I don't want any "Gavin is on the CIA's payroll" rumors to get started, either...
As always, comments and questions and discussion welcome. I'd really rather not hear any conspiracy theories about how they'll secretly implant a mind-control chip in my head while I'm there, though.... https://bitcointalk.org/?topic=6652.0
Bitcoin Classic 0.11.2
@gavinandresen gavinandresen released this on 10 Feb 2016 https://github.com/bitcoinclassic/bitcoinclassic/releases/tag/v0.11.2.cl1
@gavinandresen gavinandresen released this on 10 Feb 2016 https://github.com/bitcoinclassic/bitcoinclassic/releases/tag/v0.11.2.cl1
GitHub
bitcoinclassic/bitcoinclassic
Bitcoin Classic integration/staging tree. Contribute to bitcoinclassic/bitcoinclassic development by creating an account on GitHub.
Long term Scalability of Bitcoin and the 1 MB block size limit
November 01, 2013, 10:07:00 AM
"Consensus is the block size limit will have to rise.
Us geeks were/will/are arguing over how and when, not if..."
Gavin Andresen
El consenso es que el límite de tamaño de bloque tendrá que aumentar.
Nosotros, los frikis, estábamos discutiendo sobre cómo y cuándo, no si ...
Gavin Andresen
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=322748.msg3455664#msg3455664
November 01, 2013, 10:07:00 AM
"Consensus is the block size limit will have to rise.
Us geeks were/will/are arguing over how and when, not if..."
Gavin Andresen
El consenso es que el límite de tamaño de bloque tendrá que aumentar.
Nosotros, los frikis, estábamos discutiendo sobre cómo y cuándo, no si ...
Gavin Andresen
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=322748.msg3455664#msg3455664
Dan Kaminsky's Blog
The Cryptographically Provable Con Man
"Yeah, what the heck?
I was as surprised by the ‘proof’ as anyone, and don’t yet know exactly what is going on.
It was a mistake to agree to publish my post before I saw his– I assumed his post would simply be a signed message anybody could easily verify.
And it was probably a mistake to even start to play the Find Satoshi game, but I DO feel grateful to Satoshi.
If I’m lending credibility to the idea that a public key operation should remain private, that is entirely accidental. OF COURSE he should just publish a signed message or (equivalently) move some btc through the key associated with an early block.
Feel free to quote or republish this email".
Gavin Andresen
https://dankaminsky.com/2016/05/03/the-cryptographically-provable-con-man/
The Cryptographically Provable Con Man
"Yeah, what the heck?
I was as surprised by the ‘proof’ as anyone, and don’t yet know exactly what is going on.
It was a mistake to agree to publish my post before I saw his– I assumed his post would simply be a signed message anybody could easily verify.
And it was probably a mistake to even start to play the Find Satoshi game, but I DO feel grateful to Satoshi.
If I’m lending credibility to the idea that a public key operation should remain private, that is entirely accidental. OF COURSE he should just publish a signed message or (equivalently) move some btc through the key associated with an early block.
Feel free to quote or republish this email".
Gavin Andresen
https://dankaminsky.com/2016/05/03/the-cryptographically-provable-con-man/
Dan Kaminsky's Blog
The Cryptographically Provable Con Man
It’s not actually surprising that somebody would claim to be the creator of Bitcoin. Whoever “Satoshi Nakamoto” is, is worth several hundred million dollars. What is surprising …
@CSW_Satoshi
@CSW_Academic
@CSW_Articles
@CSW_Books
@CSW_Business
@Craig_Wright
@CSW_Cybersecurity
@CSW_Ideology
@CSW_interviews
@CSW_interviewsVideos
@CSW_Legal
@CSW_Personal
@CSW_Religion
@CSW_VideoTalks
@CSW_Patent
@CSW_Economics
@theArtofBitcoin
@TheSatoshiAfaire
@DaveKleiman
@GavinAndresen1
@RayDillinger
@GeorgeGilder
@IanGrigg
@MikeHearn
@Jimmy_Nguyen
@CalvinAyre
@DavidRees
@Hal_Finney
@CSW_Academic
@CSW_Articles
@CSW_Books
@CSW_Business
@Craig_Wright
@CSW_Cybersecurity
@CSW_Ideology
@CSW_interviews
@CSW_interviewsVideos
@CSW_Legal
@CSW_Personal
@CSW_Religion
@CSW_VideoTalks
@CSW_Patent
@CSW_Economics
@theArtofBitcoin
@TheSatoshiAfaire
@DaveKleiman
@GavinAndresen1
@RayDillinger
@GeorgeGilder
@IanGrigg
@MikeHearn
@Jimmy_Nguyen
@CalvinAyre
@DavidRees
@Hal_Finney
Bruce Wagner : When was the last time you chatted to satoshi
Gavin Andresen: Um… I haven't had email from satoshi in a couple months actually. The last email I sent him I actually told him I was going to talk at the CIA. So it's possible , that…. that may have um had something to with his deciding.
Yes, it is… possible. http://qntra.net/2015/02/there-is-nothing-new-in-the-world-except-for-the-history-you-didnt-know/#selection-61.0-81.21
Gavin Andresen: Um… I haven't had email from satoshi in a couple months actually. The last email I sent him I actually told him I was going to talk at the CIA. So it's possible , that…. that may have um had something to with his deciding.
Yes, it is… possible. http://qntra.net/2015/02/there-is-nothing-new-in-the-world-except-for-the-history-you-didnt-know/#selection-61.0-81.21
The Bitcoin Phenomenon
232.863 visualizaciones•12 abr. 2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pWblf8COH4&feature=youtu.be&t=5m42s
Here he is, confirming this story with his own mouth:
http://youtu.be/6pWblf8COH4?t=5m42s
232.863 visualizaciones•12 abr. 2014
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6pWblf8COH4&feature=youtu.be&t=5m42s
Here he is, confirming this story with his own mouth:
http://youtu.be/6pWblf8COH4?t=5m42s
YouTube
The Bitcoin Phenomenon
Produced for SQ1.tv, this Bitcoin documentary looks at the history, the ideologies, and the conflict between the politics of the early-adopters and the VCs/e...