"- Craig contacts Bitcoin Belle in early 2015. Convinces her that he is Satoshi. The two begin a relationship of sorts.

- Bitcoin Belle introduces Craig to a bunch of other influencers and uses her own credibility in the space to get him onto panels and conferences. People like John Matonis, Roger Ver and Gavin Andresen believe Craig is Satoshi and risk their reputations to support him."

Bitcoin Belle’s CCme: The woman who brought you Craig ‘Satoshi’ Wright strikes again…
| Hacker Noon
April 10th 2018

https://hackernoon.com/bitcoin-belles-ccme-the-woman-who-brought-you-craig-satoshi-wright-strikes-again-f74e4ef129a4

https://archive.is/jcZ9Z

Bitcoin Belle
https://t.me/joinchat/0lbzJP3IVsY5ODc0

Minute 11:20
"Satoshi was not a cryptographer"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpZAfAJsI0I&t=6s

"Bitcoin Whitepaper, Satoshi proof sessions with Gavin Andresen | Stefan Matthews | Ep. 19"

https://youtu.be/R03ypV9CsTc

One-dollar lulz

GAVIN ANDRESEN
@gavinandresen
MARCH 3, 2016
One-dollar lulz
A couple of months ago, Paul Sztorc published a blog post asking two very good questions:

1- “Why do you think we have a [maximum] blocksize?”

2- “What has changed, between the time that the [maximum] blocksize was introduced (July 15th, 2010), and today, which motivates us to make a corresponding change in the constraint?”

http://gavinandresen.ninja/One-Dollar-Lulz

Peter Todd recommends revoking Gavin's commit privileges to Bitcoin Core
Next
•August 20 2015

https://imgur.com/xFUVbJz

Minute 11:20
"Satoshi was not a cryptographer"
Gavin Andresen
Boston 2015
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YpZAfAJsI0I&t=6s

"In 2011, I sent my last email as Satoshi to Gavin…

Gavin,
I wish you wouldn’t keep talking about me as a mysterious shadowy figure, the press just turns that into a pirate currency angle. Maybe instead make it about the open source project and give more credit to your dev contributors; it helps motivate them."

Fully Peer-to-Peer
By Craig Wright
06 Jun 2019
https://craigwright.net/blog/law-regulation/fully-peer-to-peer/

284 2010-12-09 01:50:15 <gavinandresen> jgarzik: So thinking it through... if people did start generating a lot of transactions to timestamp arbitrary stuff (DNS transfer requests... whatever)... you think that'd eventually lead to a currency-only variation of bitcoin?


285 2010-12-09 01:51:08 <gavinandresen> jgarzik: What's the scenario that would drive that-- free transactions would be all used up, so people would look for another currency where they could get in a chain for free?

https://buildingbitcoin.org/bitcoin-dev/log-2010-12-09.html#l-274

In page 146 in this Courtlistener protocoll we all can see that there is evidence in emails between Gavin Andresen and Craig Wright 2016, that Craig can not make an public signing or transaction from block 9 without the athorization from the trustee/s. ;-)

Also this in same document 😉 Page 149, Craig can't take it anymore, attempts suicide, cuts his throat. Page 163, Gavin Andresen clarifies again that he believes the private signing and session was real. But that he was duped into thinking Craig would do it in public. Page 242. The larger block size mining application, Bitcoin XT is attacked (denial of service attack) and Satoshin@gmx.com is hacked/taken over.

https://lm.facebook.com/l.php?u=https%3A%2F%2Fstorage.courtlistener.com%2Frecap%2Fgov.uscourts.flsd.521536%2Fgov.uscourts.flsd.521536.590.5.pdf&h=AT1CT2mygxGqA3icNWs_jBDd97UCCcvPswaJk_T2QJuaBqmnZv2yPk73pYX01rxih97SFsHq4l7OC6EXkhTrQHNNDykmXARHW12txag5z6XezdtDwEuPVDsMua9zcCTusVLn