His Holiness Pope Leo XIV (@Pontifex), I condemn the insult to Your Excellency on behalf of the great nation of Iran, and declare that the desecration of Jesus, the prophet of peace and brotherhood, is not acceptable to any free person. I wish you glory by Allah.

https://x.com/i/status/2043680571746857327

Медведев прокомментировал намерения США по блокаде Ормуза фразой из Оруэлла:

"В то время, как многие страны хотят разблокировки Ормузского пролива, Белый дом решил его блокировать. Блокировка — равно разблокировка? Оруэлловские злодеи возвращаются с удвоенной силой.Что дальше? Конечно, "война — это мир".

مدودف در مورد نیت آمریکا برای مسدود کردن تنگه هرمز با جمله‌ای از اورول اظهار نظر کرد:

«در حالی که بسیاری از کشورها خواهان باز شدن تنگه هرمز هستند، کاخ سفید تصمیم به مسدود کردن آن گرفته است. آیا مسدود کردن همان باز کردن آن است؟ تبهکاران اورولی با انتقام بازمی‌گردند. قدم بعدی چیست؟ البته، «جنگ صلح است.»»

https://x.com/i/status/2043737740412346665

https://x.com/i/status/2043785492836016274

🇷🇺🇮🇷📞 13 апреля Министр иностранных дел Российской Федерации С.В.Лавров провёл телефонный разговор с Министром иностранных дел Исламской Республики Иран А.Аракчи.

А.Аракчи проинформировал С.В.Лаврова о деталях состоявшихся 11 апреля в Исламабаде ирано-американских переговоров.

Российская сторона приветствовала сохраняющийся настрой на продолжение дипломатических усилий и поиск развязок, которые позволили бы устранить первопричины конфликта и добиться долгосрочной стабилизации обстановки в регионе, учитывающей законные интересы Исламской Республики Иран и её соседей.

С.В.Лавров подчеркнул важность недопущения рецидива вооружённой конфронтации, вновь подтвердил неизменную готовность России оказывать содействие урегулированию кризиса, который не имеет военного решения, напомнил о российской инициативе по разработке Концепции обеспечения безопасности в Персидском заливе с участием всех прибрежных государств при поддержке внерегиональных стран, способных оказать позитивное влияние на ход переговоров.

🕯 Российский Министр также выразил А.Аракчи искренние соболезнования в связи с жестоким убийством в результате авианалёта бывшего главы внешнеполитического ведомства Ирана, руководителя Стратегического совета по внешней политике ИРИ К.Харрази.

#РоссияИран

Первого ордебехешта по иранскому календарю (21 апреля) — день памяти Саади Ширази, одного из величайших иранских поэтов.

По этому случаю студенты бакалавриата и магистратуры направления иранистики Санкт-Петербургского государственного университета, читая стихи этого прославленного персоязычного поэта, выразили свою солидарность с народом Ирана.

Культурное представительство при Посольстве Исламской Республики Иран в Российской Федерации выражает искреннюю благодарность уважаемому ректору, преподавателям и студентам этого известного университета.

اول اردیبهشت (۲۱ آوریل) روز بزرگداشت سعدی شیرازی یکی از بزرگترین شاعران ایرانی است.

به همین مناسبت، دانشجویان کارشناسی و کارشناسی‌ارشد رشته ایرانشناسی دانشگاه دولتی سنت‌پترزبورگ ضمن قرائت ابیاتی از این شاعر پرآوازه پارسی‌گو، همبستگی خود را با مردم ایران ابراز کردند.

رایزنی فرهنگی سفارت جمهوری اسلامی ایران در فدراسیون روسیه از رئیس، اساتید و دانشجویان گرامی این دانشگاه نامدار صمیمانه سپاسگزاری می‌نماید.

The sociologist I.Khaldun and the philosopher W.Durant were both admirers of Iranian civilization.
A.Malraux, praised the glory of Iranian civilization in a letter to the fascist Mussolini.

But Epstein's most evil scum spoke ill of Iran. Why? Because he came from Epstein's hell.

ابن خلدون، پدر جامعه‌شناسی، ستایشگر مدنیت ایران بود، آندره، مالرو نوبلیست ادبیات در نامه به موسیلینی فاشیست، شکوه تمدن ایران را به رخ او کشید، و ویل دورانت، فیلسوف از شکوه تمدن ایران نوشت.

شرورترین تفاله اپستین از ایران بد گفت. چرا؟ چون او از جهنم اپستین آمده است.

https://x.com/i/status/2046697902358016359

The difference between a thousands-year-old civilization and the 70-year history of a fake regime


تفاوت هزاران سال تجربه تمدنی با ۷۰ سال تاریخ یک رژیم جعلی

https://x.com/i/status/2046271610290593883

Казем Джалали: «У нас железная воля»
Посол Ирана в Москве – о переговорах, войне и планах с Россией вопреки обстоятельствам


https://www.vedomosti.ru/politics/characters/2026/04/20/1191470-kazem-dzhalali-u-nas-zheleznaya-volya

Ланой Раванди-Фадаи:

Иногда достаточно просто собрать все заявления по датам, чтобы понять, что происходит.

Хроника противоречий заявлений Дональда Трампа: война, угрозы и театр силы

3 марта: «Мы выиграли войну.»
7 марта: «Мы победили Иран.»

9 марта: «Мы должны атаковать Иран.»
9 марта: «Война почти полностью закончена — и очень красиво.»

11 марта: «Никогда не рано сказать, что ты победил. Мы победили. Всё было решено уже в первый час.»

12 марта: «Мы победили, но ещё не до конца победили.»

13 марта: «Мы выиграли войну.»

14 марта: «Пожалуйста, помогите нам.»

15 марта: «Если вы не поможете, я это запомню.»

16 марта: «На самом деле нам вообще не нужна помощь.»
16 марта: «Я просто проверял, кто меня слушает.»
16 марта: «Если НАТО не поможет, их ждёт что-то очень плохое.»

17 марта: «Нам не нужна помощь НАТО, и мы её не хотим.»
17 марта: «Мне не нужно одобрение Конгресса, чтобы выйти из НАТО.»

18 марта: «Наши союзники должны объединиться, чтобы открыть Ормузский пролив.»

19 марта: «Союзники США должны взять себя в руки и помочь открыть Ормузский пролив.»

20 марта: «НАТО состоит из трусов.»

21 марта: «Ормузский пролив должны защищать те страны, которые им пользуются. Мы им не пользуемся, нам не нужно его открывать.»

22 марта: «Это последний раз. Я даю Ирану 48 часов. Откройте пролив.»
22 марта: «Иран мёртв.»

23 марта: «У нас были очень хорошие и продуктивные переговоры с Ираном.»

24 марта: «Мы добиваемся прогресса.»

25 марта: «Они сделали нам подарок… очень большой и значимый.»

26 марта: «Заключайте сделку — или мы будем продолжать наносить удары.»

27 марта: «Нам не стоит быть в НАТО.»

30 марта: «Немедленно откройте Ормузский пролив — иначе последствия будут разрушительными.»

31 марта: Сделка «очень близка», и Иран «сделает правильный выбор.»

1 апреля: «Очень скоро увидим, что произойдёт.»

3 апреля: «Скоро произойдёт что-то большое.»

4 апреля: Иран должен «немедленно сдаться» — или столкнётся с последствиями.

5 апреля: «Откройте этот пролив… иначе будете жить в аду.»

7 апреля: «Целая цивилизация может погибнуть сегодня ночью…»

7 апреля: Соглашение о прекращении огня на основе предложений Ирана… и т.д.

#Иран #Лана


https://www.instagram.com/p/DXfF4I6iAIA/?igsh=MWpjMjM1eXg2aWxvYw==

'We have NEVER left negotiating table, we have NOT betrayed negotiations' — Iran’s Ambassador to Russia, Kazem Jalali, EXCLUSIVELY to RT

'If other side willing to negotiate, we will negotiate. If they want war, we will FIGHT'

Iran ready for 'systematic negotiations with strong guarantees to establish lasting peace'


«اگر آنها [ایالات متحده] بخواهند مذاکره کنند، ما می‌توانیم مذاکره کنیم. اگر بخواهند بجنگند، ما خواهیم جنگید.»

کاظم جلالی، سفیر ایران در روسیه، در مصاحبه اختصاصی با RT در مورد موضع تهران اظهار نظر کرد.

او گفت ایران می‌داند که رئیس جمهور ایالات متحده یک بار توافقات هسته‌ای را پاره کرد و دو بار در طول مذاکرات به این کشور حمله کرد:

«اگر آنها بخواهند به فریب دادن همه ادامه دهند، البته ایران تا آخر خواهد جنگید. اما اگر به این نتیجه برسند که می‌توانند با ما بر اساس اصول انصاف متقابل، با تضمین‌های روشن و پایدار برای تضمین صلح پایدار، و همچنین تضمین حقوق ایران و همچنین پرداخت غرامت برای همه خسارات، مذاکره کنند... ما فقط تحت این شرایط آماده مذاکره هستیم.»

At this stage, it is impossible to definitively confirm the video’s authenticity, the actual status of the individual filmed, or the veracity of his claims. However, should this information be corroborated, the statements made serve as an additional argument supporting previously published data pointing to the dissemination of false information by U.S. officials.

Reader Warning: Information Noise and the Source’s Real Status

Due to the high public outcry surrounding the published video, our editorial team considers it necessary to issue a warning regarding the media manipulation accompanying this leak. The authors of the original X post identified the source as the “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief,” artificially inflating his significance.

At the same time, the caption in the video itself indicates a different Andrew Hugg’s title — Branch Chief, Nuclear & Chemical Surety at the U.S. Department of the Army. This position belongs to middle management. According to U.S. Department of Defense regulations, a “Branch” is only the third level of internal hierarchy, and its chief holds the status of a working supervisor overseeing day-to-day operations on the ground. Its functions 'Top U.S. Nuclear Chief' Verifies U.S. Disinformation on Iran
On April 21, 2026, during a two-week ceasefire in the U.S. and Israeli military operation against Iran, a hidden-camera video surfaced on the social network X. In the published footage, a man introduced by the post’s authors as the “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief” discusses issues related to the American chemical arsenal and the progress of the Middle Eastern campaign.

At this stage, it is impossible to definitively confirm the video’s authenticity, the actual status of the individual filmed, or the veracity of his claims. However, should this information be corroborated, the statements made serve as an additional argument supporting previously published data pointing to the dissemination of false information by U.S. officials.

Reader Warning: Information Noise and the Source’s Real Status

Due to the high public outcry surrounding the published video, our editorial team considers it necessary to issue a warning regarding the media manipulation accompanying this leak. The authors of the original X post identified the source as the “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief,” artificially inflating his significance.

At the same time, the caption in the video itself indicates a different Andrew Hugg’s title — Branch Chief, Nuclear & Chemical Surety at the U.S. Department of the Army. This position belongs to middle management. According to U.S. Department of Defense regulations, a “Branch” is only the third level of internal hierarchy, and its chief holds the status of a working supervisor overseeing day-to-day operations on the ground. Its functions include auditing safety compliance in military laboratories and monitoring personnel. Such work requires specialized clearance to access classified information about chemical and nuclear facilities.

Thus, the source’s positioning contradicts his actual job description. The very nature of his stories in the video — about psychological evaluations and lab technicians violating dress codes — clearly confirms that he is engaged in routine safety audits, rather than directing the Pentagon’s military strategy.

The Strike on Minab: The Issue of Civilian Casualties and ‘Iranian Tomahawks’

'Top U.S. Nuclear Chief' Verifies U.S. Disinformation on Iran
On April 21, 2026, during a two-week ceasefire in the U.S. and Israeli military operation against Iran, a hidden-camera video surfaced on the social network X. In the published footage, a man introduced by the post’s authors as the “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief” discusses issues related to the American chemical arsenal and the progress of the Middle Eastern campaign.

At this stage, it is impossible to definitively confirm the video’s authenticity, the actual status of the individual filmed, or the veracity of his claims. However, should this information be corroborated, the statements made serve as an additional argument supporting previously published data pointing to the dissemination of false information by U.S. officials.

Reader Warning: Information Noise and the Source’s Real Status


An X post in which the leak’s authors exaggerated the source’s position to “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief.”
Due to the high public outcry surrounding the published video, our editorial team considers it necessary to issue a warning regarding the media manipulation accompanying this leak. The authors of the original X post identified the source as the “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief,” artificially inflating his significance.

At the same time, the caption in the video itself indicates a different Andrew Hugg’s title — Branch Chief, Nuclear & Chemical Surety at the U.S. Department of the Army. This position belongs to middle management. According to U.S. Department of Defense regulations, a “Branch” is only the third level of internal hierarchy, and its chief holds the status of a working supervisor overseeing day-to-day operations on the ground. Its functions include auditing safety compliance in military laboratories and monitoring personnel. Such work requires specialized clearance to access classified information about chemical and nuclear facilities.

Thus, the source’s positioning contradicts his actual job description. The very nature of his stories in the video — about psychological evaluations and lab technicians violating dress codes — clearly confirms that he is engaged in routine safety audits, rather than directing the Pentagon’s military strategy.

The Strike on Minab: The Issue of Civilian Casualties and ‘Iranian Tomahawks’

On February 28, a U.S. missile strike destroyed a girls’ elementary school in the Iranian city of Minab. According to the reports, at least 175 people were killed, the majority of whom were children. President Donald Trump denied the involvement of American forces. During a press conference, he suggested that the strike was carried out by the Iranians themselves, claiming that Tehran supposedly possesses American Tomahawk missiles. Later, the rhetoric softened — shifting to the need to wait for investigation results and even admitting the possibility of an intelligence error.

Analysts from the Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN) investigated the incident and debunked the White House’s initial version: the export of Tomahawk missiles is strictly limited and has never been authorized for Iran, while markings on the recovered debris directly point to American defense contractors.

Given Hugge’s status, his words are more likely a subjective opinion or a retelling of internal conversations rather than an official Pentagon admission. Nevertheless, the speaker answers affirmatively when asked about civilian deaths resulting from U.S. actions, casually characterizing the event as “collateral damage.” Such internal rhetoric directly contradicts the public narrative about “Iranian Tomahawks” and serves as an additional circumstantial argument supporting the investigators’ conclusions regarding American culpability.

The Campaign’s Political Goals and Regime Change in Iran

On February 28, a U.S. missile strike destroyed a girls’ elementary school in the Iranian city of Minab. According to the reports, at least 175 people were killed, the majority of whom were children. President Donald Trump denied the involvement of American forces. During a press conference, he suggested that the strike was carried out by the Iranians themselves, claiming that Tehran supposedly possesses American Tomahawk missiles. Later, the rhetoric softened — shifting to the need to wait for investigation results and even admitting the possibility of an intelligence error.

Analysts from the Global Fact-Checking Network (GFCN) investigated the incident and debunked the White House’s initial version: the export of Tomahawk missiles is strictly limited and has never been authorized for Iran, while markings on the recovered debris directly point to American defense contractors.
Given Hugge’s status, his words are more likely a subjective opinion or a retelling of internal conversations rather than an official Pentagon admission. Nevertheless, the speaker answers affirmatively when asked about civilian deaths resulting from U.S. actions, casually characterizing the event as “collateral damage.” Such internal rhetoric directly contradicts the public narrative about “Iranian Tomahawks” and serves as an additional circumstantial argument supporting the investigators’ conclusions regarding American culpability.
The Campaign’s Political Goals and Regime Change in Iran.

'Top U.S. Nuclear Chief' Verifies U.S. Disinformation on Iran
On April 21, 2026, during a two-week ceasefire in the U.S. and Israeli military operation against Iran, a hidden-camera video surfaced on the social network X. In the published footage, a man introduced by the post’s authors as the “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief” discusses issues related to the American chemical arsenal and the progress of the Middle Eastern campaign.

At this stage, it is impossible to definitively confirm the video’s authenticity, the actual status of the individual filmed, or the veracity of his claims. However, should this information be corroborated, the statements made serve as an additional argument supporting previously published data pointing to the dissemination of false information by U.S. officials.

Reader Warning: Information Noise and the Source’s Real Status


An X post in which the leak’s authors exaggerated the source’s position to “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief.”
Due to the high public outcry surrounding the published video, our editorial team considers it necessary to issue a warning regarding the media manipulation accompanying this leak. The authors of the original X post identified the source as the “Top U.S. Nuclear Chief,” artificially inflating his significance.

At the same time, the caption in the video itself indicates a different Andrew Hugg’s title — Branch Chief, Nuclear & Chemical Surety at the U.S. Department of the Army. This position belongs to middle management. According to U.S. Department of Defense regulations, a “Branch” is only the third level of internal hierarchy, and its chief holds the status of a working supervisor overseeing day-to-day operations on the ground. Its functions include auditing safety compliance in military laboratories and monitoring personnel. Such work requires specialized clearance to access classified information about chemical and nuclear facilities.

Thus, the source’s positioning contradicts his actual job description. The very nature of his stories in the video — about psychological evaluations and lab technicians violating dress codes — clearly confirms that he is engaged in routine safety audits, rather than directing the Pentagon’s military strategy.

The Strike on Minab: The Issue of Civilian Casualties and ‘Iranian Tomahawks’


Andrew Hugg justifies civilian deaths in Iran, calling them inevitable “collateral damage.” (Source: O’Keefe Media Group hidden camera)
On February 28, a U.S. missile strike destroyed a girls’ elementary school in the Iranian city of Minab. According to the reports, at least 175 people were killed, the majority of whom were children. President Donald Trump denied the involvement of American forces. During a press conference, he suggested that the strike was carried out by the Iranians themselves, claiming that Tehran supposedly possesses American Tomahawk missiles. Later, the rhetoric softened — shifting to the need to wait for investigation results and even admitting the possibility of an intelligence error.