Judicial Watch is fighting in court against Secretary Kennedy’s NIH over royalty payments to government employees. If you want to restore public confidence, start with transparency about the money.
https://www.judicialwatch.org/nih-royalty-payments-govt-scientists-fauci/

UPDATE: Judicial Watch sues the State Department for records on contracts, grants, and communications with several left-wing NGOs. “Americans deserve to know if their hard-earned taxpayer dollars are being used to fund foreign, left-wing organizations that have a pattern of anti-freedom and anti-American policies,” @TomFitton.

https://www.judicialwatch.org/grants-left-wing-european-ngos/

@TomFitton: I don’t want taxpayer money going to anything associated with George Soros or groups that promote anti‑American leftist agendas. Do you?
https://www.judicialwatch.org/grants-left-wing-european-ngos/

🚨In THREE days, Judicial Watch returns to the Supreme Court for the most important election integrity case in a generation. This case decides whether or not it is UNLAWFUL for states to count ballots received after Election Day. Fuel our fight: http://jwatch.us/9tTEuX

Judicial Watch uses the open records or FOIA laws and other tools to investigate and uncover misconduct by government officials and litigation to hold to account politicians and public officials who engage in corrupt activities. Fuel our fight:
http://jwatch.us/9tTEuX

BREAKING: Judicial Watch revealed that the U.S. Department of Justice has reported that the FBI found about 1.9 million pages of records that are responsive to a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuit. These documents were reportedly stored in a “hidden room” at FBI headquarters and were first revealed by former Deputy Director Dan Bongino. READ: http://jwatch.us/xkf1Fc

NEW Judicial Watch Weekly Update: FBI Finds 1.9M Records in “Hidden Room.” READ: http://jwatch.us/Ch8gVM

MASSIVE: We are on the cusp of a @JudicialWatch Supreme Court argument on MONDAY that could result in STOPPING over 30 states from counting of ballots that arrive days and weeks AFTER Eleciton Day. Most important eleciton integrity case in modern history.

TODAY is the day, Judicial Watch returns to the Supreme Court for the most important election integrity case in a generation. This case decides whether or not it is UNLAWFUL for states to count ballots received after Election Day. Fuel our fight: http://jwatch.us/9tTEuX

LISTEN LIVE: Judicial Watch Supreme Court Hearing on Post-Election Day Ballot Counting!

https://www.youtube.com/live/u609sWf7Wmc?si=dPnly8aizfMLWtgB

MASSIVE: TODAY is the @JudicialWatch Supreme Court argument that could result in STOPPING over 30 states from counting of ballots that arrive days and weeks AFTER Election Day. Most important election integrity case in modern history.

TODAY Judicial Watch’s legal team goes before the Supreme Court to argue that federal law prohibits counting ballots that arrive after Election Day. It’s one of the most important election integrity cases in modern history.
https://www.judicialwatch.org/supreme-court-argument-on-march-23/

🚨NATIONAL ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION SURVEY🚨

Should criminal noncitizens be deported? Should sanctuary policies be overturned? Judicial Watch wants YOUR voice heard!

Take the survey now: http://jwatch.us/4GkP5S

Judicial Watch Supreme Court Hearing on Post-Election Day Ballot Counting: “All agree that elections for federal office have to end on the day of the election specified by Congress. Nonetheless, Mississippi insists ballots can trickle in days or even weeks after Election Day. That position is wrong as a matter of text, precedent, history, and common sense,” Paul Clement.

@TomFitton: Judicial Watch’s legal team made historic legal arguments before the Supreme Court to preserve the idea of Election Day. The other side wants ballots counted after Election Day, but we argued it’s contrary to federal law. It creates the issue of voter fraud and undermines voter confidence. Federal law sets an Election Day, not an Election Month, and we’re hopeful the Supreme Court will agree and help restore the rule of law and confidence in our elections.

To restore election confidence, the Supreme Court should affirm that “Election Day” means what it says under federal law. Counting ballots received after Election Day undermines voter confidence, encourages voter fraud, and violates federal law. @TomFitton
https://www.judicialwatch.org/supreme-court-argument-on-march-23/

Judicial Watch has cleaned nearly 6 MILLION dirty names from the voter rolls to ensure the rule of law in our elections, and now we’re at the Supreme Court to affirm that federal law forbids counting ballots received after Election Day. @TomFitton
https://www.judicialwatch.org/supreme-court-argument-on-march-23/

The point of the federal Election-Day statutes is to set a single, uniform day for the election. Allowing ballots to trickle in days or weeks after Election Day is antithetical to that goal. “The Supreme Court now has a critical opportunity to restore a clear national standard,” @TomFitton.
https://www.judicialwatch.org/supreme-court-argument-on-march-23/