https://gather.town/
联想到 Sococo [1] 和之前推荐过的关于 Spatial Design 的文章 [2]。WFH 浪潮会催生一波类似应用的井喷吗？
[1] https://www.sococo.com/
[2] https://t.me/LinghaoCh/458
联想到 Sococo [1] 和之前推荐过的关于 Spatial Design 的文章 [2]。WFH 浪潮会催生一波类似应用的井喷吗？
[1] https://www.sococo.com/
[2] https://t.me/LinghaoCh/458
www.gather.town
Gather | Virtual HQ for Remote Teams
Work remotely side-by-side in digital Spaces that make virtual interactions more human.
https://club.q24.io/membership/
赶在最新一期解散派对 [1] 之前，推荐一下傅丰元（Bob Fu）的「灵感买家俱乐部」。加入有半年了，很喜欢会员通讯、业余公司和解散派对等项目，也从中获取了很多「灵感」。
至今觉得认识 Bob 是一件很神奇的事情：我曾经先后在偶然的情况下了解到他主催的《离线》杂志 [2] 和利器社区 [3]，但直到后来才发现它们是同一个人做的，并且好几个朋友也跟这两个项目或 Bob 本人有着各种联系。有一种世界线收束的感觉 : ) 也正是这样的社区，才让我对无可救药的简体中文网络还抱有一丝希望。
P.S. 这次解散派对上，我的朋友 Shu Ding [4] 会 demo 他正在做的一个文学 Bot。
[1] https://club.q24.io/party014/
[2] https://the-offline.com/about/
[3] https://liqi.io/
[4] https://twitter.com/shuding_
赶在最新一期解散派对 [1] 之前，推荐一下傅丰元（Bob Fu）的「灵感买家俱乐部」。加入有半年了，很喜欢会员通讯、业余公司和解散派对等项目，也从中获取了很多「灵感」。
至今觉得认识 Bob 是一件很神奇的事情：我曾经先后在偶然的情况下了解到他主催的《离线》杂志 [2] 和利器社区 [3]，但直到后来才发现它们是同一个人做的，并且好几个朋友也跟这两个项目或 Bob 本人有着各种联系。有一种世界线收束的感觉 : ) 也正是这样的社区，才让我对无可救药的简体中文网络还抱有一丝希望。
P.S. 这次解散派对上，我的朋友 Shu Ding [4] 会 demo 他正在做的一个文学 Bot。
[1] https://club.q24.io/party014/
[2] https://the-offline.com/about/
[3] https://liqi.io/
[4] https://twitter.com/shuding_
灵感买家俱乐部 Ling School
成为会员❤️
加入「灵感买家俱乐部」，支持我做一份关于「工具、观念和谜题」的电子杂志，遇见一群独立创作者、自学者和冒险者。
俱乐部成员除了获得电子杂志，还可以参加会员活动，参加每两周一期的解散派对和每月一期的业余公司。
❣️十月初，微信和支付宝支付渠道麦客表单停服维护，如果你想办会员或续费可以直接联系鲍勃。
入会方式：
1. 选择适合你的支付方式和会员方案：(订前试读：[第一期] [第二期]）
微信或支付宝支付： 年度会员 （¥350）或 季度会员 （¥99），到期后需手动续费。
信用卡： 月度会员…
俱乐部成员除了获得电子杂志，还可以参加会员活动，参加每两周一期的解散派对和每月一期的业余公司。
❣️十月初，微信和支付宝支付渠道麦客表单停服维护，如果你想办会员或续费可以直接联系鲍勃。
入会方式：
1. 选择适合你的支付方式和会员方案：(订前试读：[第一期] [第二期]）
微信或支付宝支付： 年度会员 （¥350）或 季度会员 （¥99），到期后需手动续费。
信用卡： 月度会员…
Because politicians are making sure history isn't being taught anymore.
https://twitter.com/thomassowell/status/1314959750552055810?s=28
https://twitter.com/thomassowell/status/1314959750552055810?s=28
Twitter
Thomas Sowell
How can anyone read history and still trust politicians?
盲视的同人短片终于出来了！网站也做得很棒。
https://blindsight.space/
https://blindsight.space/
blindsight.space
Blindsight
Forwarded from myNlpTrainingSet
今晚看《赛博空间的奥德赛》第六章看嗨了，想随便谈一些自己的胡思乱想。
互动性与叙事性是相矛盾的，当你设定了特定的叙事结构的时候，故事的互动性就受到了打压，如果你增加了互动的机会，叙事性就会被不可避免地降低。
叙事，在维基百科中的定义是“对于故事的描述”，我对此理解为，“叙事”是对某种在某个空间业已确定发生的事的描述，完全的叙事代表着互动性的归零，而完全的互动性代表着叙事的消失——从单条时间线的意义上来说。
就游戏来举例的话，galgame显然属于叙事性较强的一类游戏，与之相比，像 Minecraft 这样的游戏几乎消解了叙事性，更像是游戏规则的聚合体，这样的游戏极大的提高了观众（或者说玩家）的互动可能性，具有强大的自解魅能力，完成了《玛丽亚温泉市》等艺术实验性作品都无法做到的目标。
而我的心中最完美的游戏是类似于上帝造物的完全消解了叙事与规则，只剩下了纯粹的互动性的游戏，从而达到完全的解魅，当然，这样的游戏是不可能存在的，而且在这样的游戏中，我的任何互动都是对叙事的赋予（这就是另一个话题了）
互动性与叙事性是相矛盾的，当你设定了特定的叙事结构的时候，故事的互动性就受到了打压，如果你增加了互动的机会，叙事性就会被不可避免地降低。
叙事，在维基百科中的定义是“对于故事的描述”，我对此理解为，“叙事”是对某种在某个空间业已确定发生的事的描述，完全的叙事代表着互动性的归零，而完全的互动性代表着叙事的消失——从单条时间线的意义上来说。
就游戏来举例的话，galgame显然属于叙事性较强的一类游戏，与之相比，像 Minecraft 这样的游戏几乎消解了叙事性，更像是游戏规则的聚合体，这样的游戏极大的提高了观众（或者说玩家）的互动可能性，具有强大的自解魅能力，完成了《玛丽亚温泉市》等艺术实验性作品都无法做到的目标。
而我的心中最完美的游戏是类似于上帝造物的完全消解了叙事与规则，只剩下了纯粹的互动性的游戏，从而达到完全的解魅，当然，这样的游戏是不可能存在的，而且在这样的游戏中，我的任何互动都是对叙事的赋予（这就是另一个话题了）
有意思的观点，不过互动性和叙事性并不一定是此消彼长的两面。举例来说，Tacoma 就通过巧妙的设计使得互动和叙事互相促进。
https://store.steampowered.com/app/343860/Tacoma/
https://store.steampowered.com/app/343860/Tacoma/
Steampowered
Save 67% on Tacoma on Steam
Tacoma is a sci-fi narrative adventure from the creators of Gone Home. Set aboard a high-tech space station in the year 2088, explore every detail of how the station’s crew lived and worked, finding the clues that add up to a gripping story of trust, fear…
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL-THgg8QnvU4JEVov1tMlFThNYS92F8uC
推荐 Noclip 的这个系列，记录了最近刚发布 1.0 版且好评如潮的游戏 Hades 在 Early Access 期间的开发历程。
推荐 Noclip 的这个系列，记录了最近刚发布 1.0 版且好评如潮的游戏 Hades 在 Early Access 期间的开发历程。
YouTube
Hades: Developing Hell
Our series following the devlopment of Supergiant Games' Hades.
https://www.spakhm.com/p/surviving-disillusionment
> But sitting at a mandated retrospective or mindlessly gluing APIs together doesn't put me over the moon. It makes me feel the opposite (whatever the opposite of being over the moon is). And so, engineers are faced with two realities. One reality is the atmosphere of new technology, its incredible power to transform the human condition, the joy of the art of doing science and engineering, the trials of the creative process, the romance of the frontier. The other reality is the frustration and drudgery of operating in a world of corporate politics, bureaucracy, envy and greed— a world so depressing, that many people quit in frustration, never to come back.
> I have friends in the medical field, and they vent about drudgery and endless bureaucracy all the time. They have more roadblocks than we do, and theirs are objectively worse than ours. The hours are longer, the bureaucracy is more entrenched, the regulators mandate their time be wasted on bullshit, and mistakes can have devastating consequences. Yet I haven't heard of a single doctor who quit his practice and moved to Colorado to run a ski lodge. When I ask why, they all give the same response: the patients. Every day they see patients brought back to health, the bullshit recedes into the background, and they're reminded why they got into medicine.
> The default in engineering is different. We don't have a daily ritual built into our jobs that reminds us why we got into the field. Without a ritual, the drudgery creeps closer and the vision of the monastery recedes. So we must be very deliberate in developing rituals to keep the two realities in their proper proportion.
> I think the reason many engineers have trouble with this is that so much of our field is about knowledge, but rituals aren't about knowledge at all— they're about practice. You must develop a daily mantra, a spell, a routine, whatever you want to call it, and then perform it religiously.
> But sitting at a mandated retrospective or mindlessly gluing APIs together doesn't put me over the moon. It makes me feel the opposite (whatever the opposite of being over the moon is). And so, engineers are faced with two realities. One reality is the atmosphere of new technology, its incredible power to transform the human condition, the joy of the art of doing science and engineering, the trials of the creative process, the romance of the frontier. The other reality is the frustration and drudgery of operating in a world of corporate politics, bureaucracy, envy and greed— a world so depressing, that many people quit in frustration, never to come back.
> I have friends in the medical field, and they vent about drudgery and endless bureaucracy all the time. They have more roadblocks than we do, and theirs are objectively worse than ours. The hours are longer, the bureaucracy is more entrenched, the regulators mandate their time be wasted on bullshit, and mistakes can have devastating consequences. Yet I haven't heard of a single doctor who quit his practice and moved to Colorado to run a ski lodge. When I ask why, they all give the same response: the patients. Every day they see patients brought back to health, the bullshit recedes into the background, and they're reminded why they got into medicine.
> The default in engineering is different. We don't have a daily ritual built into our jobs that reminds us why we got into the field. Without a ritual, the drudgery creeps closer and the vision of the monastery recedes. So we must be very deliberate in developing rituals to keep the two realities in their proper proportion.
> I think the reason many engineers have trouble with this is that so much of our field is about knowledge, but rituals aren't about knowledge at all— they're about practice. You must develop a daily mantra, a spell, a routine, whatever you want to call it, and then perform it religiously.
Zero Credibility
Surviving disillusionment
Engineers don't have a daily ritual that reminds us why we got into the field. Without a ritual, the drudgery creeps closer and the vision of the monastery recedes.