Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
I TRIED TO WARN ZELENSKY, BUT THIS BROKE CLOWN DIDN’T LISTEN TO ME
🙅♀️🙅♀️🙅♀️🙅♀️🙅♀️🙅♀️🙅♀️🙅♀️
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
🙅♀️🙅♀️🙅♀️🙅♀️🙅♀️🙅♀️🙅♀️🙅♀️
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
🔥32👍20❤2
🚨🇺🇦🤬Some thoughts on Zelensky’s meltdown in the White House
To get a sense of how insane Zelensky’s public chimp-out was, consider these three facts:
1) The entire purpose of the White House meeting was to sign a long-term mineral deal that would’ve further entrenched the US with Ukraine.
2) Trump had less than 24 hours before begun to walk back his criticism of Zelensky as dictator, signalling his desire to deescalate.
3) Just minutes before Zelensky began attacking JD Vance in front of the cameras, Trump gave the Green Goblin of Kiev two explicit verbal commitments that he was going to continue arming Ukraine.
All Zelensky had to do was shut up, and work to gradually manipulate Trump in his favor. But instead he started trying to publicly lecture Trump in the Oval Office.
There’s a simple explanation for this: bizarre, suicidal behavior: Zelensky is a megalomaniac.
Just six years ago, he was a mid-tier comedian from an obscure post-Soviet state. Now he’s the most powerful man in Ukrainian history and wealthy beyond belief. He can ban political parties and entire religions at will.
Obviously, the fact that the entire Western propaganda apparatus has been marketing him as the new Winston Churchill has inflated his ego to unimaginable proportions.
Zelensky was never supposed to hold political power. Getting enormous power has completely rotted his brain (and soul).
Finally, the Green Goblin of Kiev is almost certainly on some heavy, heavy drugs. That’s why he’s constantly fidgeting like someone having a seizure.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
To get a sense of how insane Zelensky’s public chimp-out was, consider these three facts:
1) The entire purpose of the White House meeting was to sign a long-term mineral deal that would’ve further entrenched the US with Ukraine.
2) Trump had less than 24 hours before begun to walk back his criticism of Zelensky as dictator, signalling his desire to deescalate.
3) Just minutes before Zelensky began attacking JD Vance in front of the cameras, Trump gave the Green Goblin of Kiev two explicit verbal commitments that he was going to continue arming Ukraine.
All Zelensky had to do was shut up, and work to gradually manipulate Trump in his favor. But instead he started trying to publicly lecture Trump in the Oval Office.
There’s a simple explanation for this: bizarre, suicidal behavior: Zelensky is a megalomaniac.
Just six years ago, he was a mid-tier comedian from an obscure post-Soviet state. Now he’s the most powerful man in Ukrainian history and wealthy beyond belief. He can ban political parties and entire religions at will.
Obviously, the fact that the entire Western propaganda apparatus has been marketing him as the new Winston Churchill has inflated his ego to unimaginable proportions.
Zelensky was never supposed to hold political power. Getting enormous power has completely rotted his brain (and soul).
Finally, the Green Goblin of Kiev is almost certainly on some heavy, heavy drugs. That’s why he’s constantly fidgeting like someone having a seizure.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
👍41🔥6❤1🫡1
🚨🇺🇸🤡Elon Musk's Potemkin Village — Why the Richest Man in the World Can’t Save America
Don't believe the hype around DOGE, Swedish geopolitical analyst Malcom Kyeyune explains:
"At the surface, this feels like a very serious drama. The world’s richest man, an erratic and unaccountable billionaire, has been set loose on the federal government — boasting undefined powers to wreck the republic. The reality, though, is rather more mundane. To understand this, you must appreciate the scale of DOGE’s sweep. Yes, it’s easy to mock USAID for schemes such as the $70,000 spent on a “DEI musical” in Ireland. Yet when placed next to the full size of the national budget, Musk is conducting the administrative equivalent of scrambling about for change behind the sofa.
After all, the government today runs a deficit close to $2 trillion a year. To fund this deficit, it borrows roughly $10 billion each and every day. It’s important to realise here that while most countries do have some kind of national debt, the size and trajectory of America’s deficit is different. In 2000, the national debt was some $5.7 trillion dollars. In 2017, when Trump first took office, it was $20 trillion. Now, it’s over $36 trillion, putting unsustainable pressure on defence and social welfare costs. Even the most generous accounting of what Musk and Trump have achieved so far boils down to a few hours of US debt. And that’s if they can defend it all in court, and make it stick — and there’s no guarantee of that.
DOGE, in short, is a gimmick. Any meaningful control of US government spending can’t be attained through bureaucratic jiu-jitsu or legal trickery. To really cut the deficit, Trump would either have to literally crown himself king and abolish the Constitution, or else go to Congress and get them to actually do the job the Founding Fathers gave them. But Trump can’t do either of these things. If he simply ruled by decree, a polarised nation would explode into civil war. Yet, as bleak as that sounds, it might actually be more realistic than having Congress appropriate the funds. The legislature can nowadays barely pass the stop-gap, temporary funding measures it uses in lieu of actual budgets to prevent government shutdowns. The last time Congress passed all its required bills on time was in 1996, and over the last 40 years it has only managed to complete the appropriations process a grand total of four times.
Where, then, does that leave the president? In a word, trapped: in a political system collapsing round his ears."
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
Don't believe the hype around DOGE, Swedish geopolitical analyst Malcom Kyeyune explains:
"At the surface, this feels like a very serious drama. The world’s richest man, an erratic and unaccountable billionaire, has been set loose on the federal government — boasting undefined powers to wreck the republic. The reality, though, is rather more mundane. To understand this, you must appreciate the scale of DOGE’s sweep. Yes, it’s easy to mock USAID for schemes such as the $70,000 spent on a “DEI musical” in Ireland. Yet when placed next to the full size of the national budget, Musk is conducting the administrative equivalent of scrambling about for change behind the sofa.
After all, the government today runs a deficit close to $2 trillion a year. To fund this deficit, it borrows roughly $10 billion each and every day. It’s important to realise here that while most countries do have some kind of national debt, the size and trajectory of America’s deficit is different. In 2000, the national debt was some $5.7 trillion dollars. In 2017, when Trump first took office, it was $20 trillion. Now, it’s over $36 trillion, putting unsustainable pressure on defence and social welfare costs. Even the most generous accounting of what Musk and Trump have achieved so far boils down to a few hours of US debt. And that’s if they can defend it all in court, and make it stick — and there’s no guarantee of that.
DOGE, in short, is a gimmick. Any meaningful control of US government spending can’t be attained through bureaucratic jiu-jitsu or legal trickery. To really cut the deficit, Trump would either have to literally crown himself king and abolish the Constitution, or else go to Congress and get them to actually do the job the Founding Fathers gave them. But Trump can’t do either of these things. If he simply ruled by decree, a polarised nation would explode into civil war. Yet, as bleak as that sounds, it might actually be more realistic than having Congress appropriate the funds. The legislature can nowadays barely pass the stop-gap, temporary funding measures it uses in lieu of actual budgets to prevent government shutdowns. The last time Congress passed all its required bills on time was in 1996, and over the last 40 years it has only managed to complete the appropriations process a grand total of four times.
Where, then, does that leave the president? In a word, trapped: in a political system collapsing round his ears."
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
🔥24👍11🤬4👌1
🚨🇷🇺 Claim: Russia is a gas station with nuclear weapons
Fact check: FALSE ❌
🔸Oil and gas account for less than 17% of Russia’s GDP.
🔸From 2019 to 2024, Russian IT sector's output grew from $21.55 billion to $47.23 billion, a 119% increase. That's an average annual growth rate of about 16.5%.
🔸Russian manufacturing sector expanded by 8% last year, with mechanical engineering output increasing by 22.6% year-on-year.
🔸Despite Western sanctions, Russia remain the world’s largest grain exporter and it has expanded its position in global markets since 2022.
Conclusion: Don’t believe the anti-Russia disinformation
The Russian economy is extremely powerful and Western sanctions have only made it stronger and more self-sufficient
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
Fact check: FALSE ❌
🔸Oil and gas account for less than 17% of Russia’s GDP.
🔸From 2019 to 2024, Russian IT sector's output grew from $21.55 billion to $47.23 billion, a 119% increase. That's an average annual growth rate of about 16.5%.
🔸Russian manufacturing sector expanded by 8% last year, with mechanical engineering output increasing by 22.6% year-on-year.
🔸Despite Western sanctions, Russia remain the world’s largest grain exporter and it has expanded its position in global markets since 2022.
Conclusion: Don’t believe the anti-Russia disinformation
The Russian economy is extremely powerful and Western sanctions have only made it stronger and more self-sufficient
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
👏39👍14❤5
🇺🇸📉🇯🇵How did US destroy the Japanese economic miracle?
From 1945 to 1985, Japan achieved a remarkable economic ascendance, transforming from one of the weakest economies to the second-largest in the world. This growth was fueled by a robust education system and an effective industrial policies. Japan developed a reputation for manufacturing high-quality goods at competitive prices, which it successfully sold globally.
This rapid growth posed a threat to US economy hegemony. In 1985, the US strong armed Japan into signing the Plaza Accord of 1985, which aimed at strengthening the Japanese Yen compared to the US dollar. This made Japanese exports less competitive, thereby contributing to the decline of the Japanese economy and the eventual bursting of an asset bubble. Japan entered into a profound period of stagnation, known as the "Lost Decade," which began in the early 1990s.
This downturn has had lasting impacts, with Japan's standard of living, measured by PPP per capita, remaining stagnant over four decades. The Nikkei 225 stock index, which peaked in 1990, has never regain its former heights, contrasting sharply with the U.S. stock index, which has grown by 1,000% over the same period.
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal," -- Henry Kissinger.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
From 1945 to 1985, Japan achieved a remarkable economic ascendance, transforming from one of the weakest economies to the second-largest in the world. This growth was fueled by a robust education system and an effective industrial policies. Japan developed a reputation for manufacturing high-quality goods at competitive prices, which it successfully sold globally.
This rapid growth posed a threat to US economy hegemony. In 1985, the US strong armed Japan into signing the Plaza Accord of 1985, which aimed at strengthening the Japanese Yen compared to the US dollar. This made Japanese exports less competitive, thereby contributing to the decline of the Japanese economy and the eventual bursting of an asset bubble. Japan entered into a profound period of stagnation, known as the "Lost Decade," which began in the early 1990s.
This downturn has had lasting impacts, with Japan's standard of living, measured by PPP per capita, remaining stagnant over four decades. The Nikkei 225 stock index, which peaked in 1990, has never regain its former heights, contrasting sharply with the U.S. stock index, which has grown by 1,000% over the same period.
"It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal," -- Henry Kissinger.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
👍38👌6❤4
🚨🇺🇸🏦 SHOCKING STATISTICS about the US economy — Trump should be hitting the RED ALERT button
If you just look at nominal GDP numbers, you’d think that the US is the largest economy in the world. But this data only tells part of the story.
Let’s take a look a first chart. More than 50% of US economic growth comes from healthcare and government spending. Since January 2023, the government has created more jobs than the tech, finance, construction, and manufacturing sectors COMBINED.
Meanwhile, looking at the second chart, it becomes clear that adjusting for growth of the money supply, the average American has experiencing decline in their income and purchasing power.
In other words, the US economy is held up by three pillars — out of control government spending, out of control money printing, and out of control healthcare costs. This is not a what healthy and productive economy looks like.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
If you just look at nominal GDP numbers, you’d think that the US is the largest economy in the world. But this data only tells part of the story.
Let’s take a look a first chart. More than 50% of US economic growth comes from healthcare and government spending. Since January 2023, the government has created more jobs than the tech, finance, construction, and manufacturing sectors COMBINED.
Meanwhile, looking at the second chart, it becomes clear that adjusting for growth of the money supply, the average American has experiencing decline in their income and purchasing power.
In other words, the US economy is held up by three pillars — out of control government spending, out of control money printing, and out of control healthcare costs. This is not a what healthy and productive economy looks like.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
👍28❤6
🚨🇷🇺 Claim: Russian economy is smaller than Italy's or [insert random European country]
Fact check: FALSE ❌
🔸Russia is the fourth largest economy in the world and the largest in Europe in terms of GDP based on Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)
🔸GDP PPP is better for comparing living standards and real economic size across countries since it accounts for price differences. It shows what people can actually buy with their income in their own country.
🔸Nominal GDP uses current market exchange rates to convert a country's GDP into US dollars without adjusting for price differences. This doesn’t reflect what people can actually buy in their own country.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
Fact check: FALSE ❌
🔸Russia is the fourth largest economy in the world and the largest in Europe in terms of GDP based on Purchasing Power Parity (PPP)
🔸GDP PPP is better for comparing living standards and real economic size across countries since it accounts for price differences. It shows what people can actually buy with their income in their own country.
🔸Nominal GDP uses current market exchange rates to convert a country's GDP into US dollars without adjusting for price differences. This doesn’t reflect what people can actually buy in their own country.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
👏35👍7❤2
🇬🇧🇺🇦🤡 RETARDED LIBERALS: Keir Starmer is the new leader of the free world, the UK will help Ukraine defeat Russia
MEANWHILE, REALITY: “Great” Britain at full strength would barely last two months against Russia on the battlefield, even if we set aside the obvious logistical nightmare of deploying to Ukraine.
The only way the UK could have a fighting chance against Russia is to go nuclear, which will lead to national suicide.
Side note: If you have to put “Great” in your name, you’re probably overcompensating. Imagine some third-world country naming itself the “Super Awesome and Prosperous Republic” of XYZ. This is basically the same thing.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
MEANWHILE, REALITY: “Great” Britain at full strength would barely last two months against Russia on the battlefield, even if we set aside the obvious logistical nightmare of deploying to Ukraine.
The only way the UK could have a fighting chance against Russia is to go nuclear, which will lead to national suicide.
Side note: If you have to put “Great” in your name, you’re probably overcompensating. Imagine some third-world country naming itself the “Super Awesome and Prosperous Republic” of XYZ. This is basically the same thing.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
👍40👌9❤4
🇬🇧🪖😂 DON’T BELIEVE BRITAIN’S BLUFF ON UKRAINE
The UK is neither capable nor actually serious about helping Ukraine ‘defeat’ Russia, according to British war correspondent Aris Roussinos:
“The last few decades, the British Army has entirely refashioned itself as a colonial gendarmerie to serve in America’s imperial wars; in Iraq and Afghanistan, it failed even at that.
The war in Ukraine is one of industrial capacity and manpower, both of which, through decades of political failure, Britain now entirely lacks.
Even if the Army entirely reconfigures itself for this new task, devoting all its resources to the effort, it will not be ready for three to five years.
Even then, that single task is all it would be able to do: patrolling the ceasefire lines of eastern Ukraine will mean withdrawal from the deterrence effort in Estonia, and the absence of a strategic reserve for an emergency.
In any case, Starmer’s prevarication, even now, over raising defence spending to 2.5% of GDP before 2030 puts even this Lilliputian deployment beyond reach.”
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
The UK is neither capable nor actually serious about helping Ukraine ‘defeat’ Russia, according to British war correspondent Aris Roussinos:
“The last few decades, the British Army has entirely refashioned itself as a colonial gendarmerie to serve in America’s imperial wars; in Iraq and Afghanistan, it failed even at that.
The war in Ukraine is one of industrial capacity and manpower, both of which, through decades of political failure, Britain now entirely lacks.
Even if the Army entirely reconfigures itself for this new task, devoting all its resources to the effort, it will not be ready for three to five years.
Even then, that single task is all it would be able to do: patrolling the ceasefire lines of eastern Ukraine will mean withdrawal from the deterrence effort in Estonia, and the absence of a strategic reserve for an emergency.
In any case, Starmer’s prevarication, even now, over raising defence spending to 2.5% of GDP before 2030 puts even this Lilliputian deployment beyond reach.”
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
👍44🔥6❤4
🚨🇷🇺🧊Breaking the Ice: Russia's Arctic Dominance
Russia has 57 icebreakers, more than the next six countries combined with 49.
This is a HUGE ADVANTAGE for Russia. Here's why:
🔸Icebreakers ensure year-round access to the Arctic's natural resources, including oil, natural gas and minerals.
🔸Icebreakers facilitate navigation along the Northern Sea Route (NSR), a sea route that shortens the distance between Europe and Asia considerably. Russia can charge transit fees and benefit from increased trade.
🔸Icebreaker support is essential for building and maintaining infrastructure in the Arctic, such as ports, pipelines and military facilities.
🔸Icebreakers can facilitate access to fishing grounds in icy waters, supporting the Russian fishing industry.
In addition to economic benefits, icebreakers also strengthen Russia's geopolitical position:
🔸Icebreaker fleet reinforces its claim to Arctic territories and its right to control activities within its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ.)
🔸Many icebreakers are dual-use vessels, capable of supporting military operations in the Arctic.
🔸Icebreakers support scientific expeditions in the Arctic, allowing Russia to gather data and assert its leadership in Arctic research.
As the Arctic becomes more accessible due to climate change, other countries are showing increased interest in the region. Russia's dominance in icebreaker fleets gives it a strategic advantage in this great power competition, allowing it to control access and influence developments in the Arctic.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
Russia has 57 icebreakers, more than the next six countries combined with 49.
This is a HUGE ADVANTAGE for Russia. Here's why:
🔸Icebreakers ensure year-round access to the Arctic's natural resources, including oil, natural gas and minerals.
🔸Icebreakers facilitate navigation along the Northern Sea Route (NSR), a sea route that shortens the distance between Europe and Asia considerably. Russia can charge transit fees and benefit from increased trade.
🔸Icebreaker support is essential for building and maintaining infrastructure in the Arctic, such as ports, pipelines and military facilities.
🔸Icebreakers can facilitate access to fishing grounds in icy waters, supporting the Russian fishing industry.
In addition to economic benefits, icebreakers also strengthen Russia's geopolitical position:
🔸Icebreaker fleet reinforces its claim to Arctic territories and its right to control activities within its Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ.)
🔸Many icebreakers are dual-use vessels, capable of supporting military operations in the Arctic.
🔸Icebreakers support scientific expeditions in the Arctic, allowing Russia to gather data and assert its leadership in Arctic research.
As the Arctic becomes more accessible due to climate change, other countries are showing increased interest in the region. Russia's dominance in icebreaker fleets gives it a strategic advantage in this great power competition, allowing it to control access and influence developments in the Arctic.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
👏28👍8❤3👌2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇺🇦💰Rich Ukrainians throw elaborate parties, buy luxury cars, and vacation at elite European resorts.
🪖💀 Meanwhile, poor Ukrainian men are sent as cannon fodder against Russian drones and artillery.
📹🤬 This video compilation will make YOUR BLOOD BOIL
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
🪖💀 Meanwhile, poor Ukrainian men are sent as cannon fodder against Russian drones and artillery.
📹🤬 This video compilation will make YOUR BLOOD BOIL
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
🤬57👍2
🚨🇺🇦Zelensky is pushing Ukraine off a demographic cliff
Ukraine has faced demographic challenges for decades, but the war has significantly exacerbated the situation. Here's a breakdown:
🔸Since the start of the war, almost 7M of people has fled from Ukraine to Europe and Russia
🔸Pre-existing Decline: From 1991, 51.5M to 2022 (pre-conflict), 41M. Ukraine has 10.5M (20.4%) of population drop in 30 years.
🔸Brain Drain and the loss of young Ukrainians: "Ukraine has suffered a lot because of the ‘brain drain’ of kids leaving the country and potentially not coming back,” said Inna Sovsun, Member of Ukrainian Parliament.
🔸The instability and economic hardship discourage people from having children.
This outflow of young people has long-term implications for Ukraine's future, from labor shortages to rebuilt the country, and the economy. The demographic imbalance looks terrible for the next decade, or even earlier.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
Ukraine has faced demographic challenges for decades, but the war has significantly exacerbated the situation. Here's a breakdown:
🔸Since the start of the war, almost 7M of people has fled from Ukraine to Europe and Russia
🔸Pre-existing Decline: From 1991, 51.5M to 2022 (pre-conflict), 41M. Ukraine has 10.5M (20.4%) of population drop in 30 years.
🔸Brain Drain and the loss of young Ukrainians: "Ukraine has suffered a lot because of the ‘brain drain’ of kids leaving the country and potentially not coming back,” said Inna Sovsun, Member of Ukrainian Parliament.
🔸The instability and economic hardship discourage people from having children.
This outflow of young people has long-term implications for Ukraine's future, from labor shortages to rebuilt the country, and the economy. The demographic imbalance looks terrible for the next decade, or even earlier.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
🤬14👏5❤1
🚨🇷🇺🪖The Myth of Russian Aggression
For centuries, Europeans have tried to potray Russia as a dangerous collosus hellbent on devouring the entire continent. We're seeing they them recycle the same trope right now to justify continuing the proxy war in Ukraine.
In reality, Russia is a longtime VICTIM OF EUROPEAN AGGRESSION. Don't believe us? Here is the proof:
🔸800 years ago: Teutonic Knights invaded Russia
🔸400 years ago, Poland-Lithuania invaded Russia
🔸300 years ago, Sweden invaded Russia again
🔸200 years ago, Napoleonic France invaded Russia
🔸175 years ago, France and British Empire invaded Russia (Crimean War)
🔸80 years ago, Nazi Germany invaded Russia
🔸2022-present, NATO has been waging full-blown proxy war against Russia in Ukraine
Europeans don't need protection from Russia. In fact, it is Russia that needs protection from Europeans. Only a strong Russian military and tough foreign policy can deter Europe from attacking Russia.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
For centuries, Europeans have tried to potray Russia as a dangerous collosus hellbent on devouring the entire continent. We're seeing they them recycle the same trope right now to justify continuing the proxy war in Ukraine.
In reality, Russia is a longtime VICTIM OF EUROPEAN AGGRESSION. Don't believe us? Here is the proof:
🔸800 years ago: Teutonic Knights invaded Russia
🔸400 years ago, Poland-Lithuania invaded Russia
🔸300 years ago, Sweden invaded Russia again
🔸200 years ago, Napoleonic France invaded Russia
🔸175 years ago, France and British Empire invaded Russia (Crimean War)
🔸80 years ago, Nazi Germany invaded Russia
🔸2022-present, NATO has been waging full-blown proxy war against Russia in Ukraine
Europeans don't need protection from Russia. In fact, it is Russia that needs protection from Europeans. Only a strong Russian military and tough foreign policy can deter Europe from attacking Russia.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
👍69🔥14❤5🤬3
🇪🇺🤡🤦♀️ Europeans are INSANE if they honestly believe that they can defeat Russia
There is no universe where the European Union can keep the proxy war in Ukraine going if Trump decides to dump Zelensky, according to Director of Eurointelligence Wolfgang Munchau:
“Without America, there is no road to victory for Ukraine. This is not primarily about weapons, ammunition, and financial aid, but about satellite support and intelligence. If the US were to switch off the satellites and stop the flow of information, the Europeans have no way of plugging the gap. Without the US, it’s over for Ukraine.
We have not figured out how we can support Ukraine and stay solvent. The most desperate idea has been to plunder Russia’s $300bn in foreign reserves, which are currently frozen. Clearly this hasn’t been thought through. If that were to happen, the risk is that Euroclear, the Brussels-based financial depository where the reserves are held, could face a slew of lawsuits and even bankruptcy. The EU would be forced to spend tens of billions to recapitalise the company —potentially costing more than the aid to Ukraine. The trust in Europe as a safe place for assets would be lost and we could end up with a full-blown financial crisis.
A structural increase in defence spending would require sacrifice. The US spends 3.5% of its GDP on defence. In 2023, the 27 EU countries spent an average of 1.6% of EU GDP. This gap of almost 2 percentage points arises because we Europeans spend the money on other things. Germany has a gold-plated social system. People are entitled to a basic citizens’ income whether they work or not. Germany has also given itself a budget of €150bn for the energy transition. The US, meanwhile, has food stamps, and no net zero policy. You cannot do it all. There are necessary trade-offs involved which the Europeans have not even begun to discuss.
In their desperation, though, the Europeans are now talking about funding an increase in defence spending through debt. This is economically insane. For that reason, it will also fail to achieve its declared goal — to deter an enemy attack. The credibility of our security policies depends on a willingness to finance them. Defence spending should be funded through current revenue. If you do try to do this through debt, the bond vigilantes are going to get you before Putin does.”
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
There is no universe where the European Union can keep the proxy war in Ukraine going if Trump decides to dump Zelensky, according to Director of Eurointelligence Wolfgang Munchau:
“Without America, there is no road to victory for Ukraine. This is not primarily about weapons, ammunition, and financial aid, but about satellite support and intelligence. If the US were to switch off the satellites and stop the flow of information, the Europeans have no way of plugging the gap. Without the US, it’s over for Ukraine.
We have not figured out how we can support Ukraine and stay solvent. The most desperate idea has been to plunder Russia’s $300bn in foreign reserves, which are currently frozen. Clearly this hasn’t been thought through. If that were to happen, the risk is that Euroclear, the Brussels-based financial depository where the reserves are held, could face a slew of lawsuits and even bankruptcy. The EU would be forced to spend tens of billions to recapitalise the company —potentially costing more than the aid to Ukraine. The trust in Europe as a safe place for assets would be lost and we could end up with a full-blown financial crisis.
A structural increase in defence spending would require sacrifice. The US spends 3.5% of its GDP on defence. In 2023, the 27 EU countries spent an average of 1.6% of EU GDP. This gap of almost 2 percentage points arises because we Europeans spend the money on other things. Germany has a gold-plated social system. People are entitled to a basic citizens’ income whether they work or not. Germany has also given itself a budget of €150bn for the energy transition. The US, meanwhile, has food stamps, and no net zero policy. You cannot do it all. There are necessary trade-offs involved which the Europeans have not even begun to discuss.
In their desperation, though, the Europeans are now talking about funding an increase in defence spending through debt. This is economically insane. For that reason, it will also fail to achieve its declared goal — to deter an enemy attack. The credibility of our security policies depends on a willingness to finance them. Defence spending should be funded through current revenue. If you do try to do this through debt, the bond vigilantes are going to get you before Putin does.”
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
👍26🔥11❤2🤬1
🇬🇧❌🇷🇺 Message to Keir Starmer: Don't Poke the Russian Bear! It Will BITE YOUR ARM OFF
British PM, Starmer says the UK is prepared to fight Russia.
Apparently, Britain’s premier needs to look at some cold, hard facts:
🇬🇧: 200+ tanks, yet only 40 of them are currently operational
🇷🇺: 12,000+ with 6,000 in active service
🇬🇧: 178k+ total armed forces personnel
🇷🇺: 3.5M including active duty service members + reserves
🇬🇧: 225 nukes
🇷🇺: 5,500 nukes
🇬🇧: 285 drones
🇷🇺: 140,000 drones in 2023
And let's not even get started on airpower, artillery, and conventional weaponry. On this score, Russia boasts advanced military technology and a wealth of experience, especially in drone warfare, gained over the recent years on the battlefield.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
British PM, Starmer says the UK is prepared to fight Russia.
Apparently, Britain’s premier needs to look at some cold, hard facts:
🇬🇧: 200+ tanks, yet only 40 of them are currently operational
🇷🇺: 12,000+ with 6,000 in active service
🇬🇧: 178k+ total armed forces personnel
🇷🇺: 3.5M including active duty service members + reserves
🇬🇧: 225 nukes
🇷🇺: 5,500 nukes
🇬🇧: 285 drones
🇷🇺: 140,000 drones in 2023
And let's not even get started on airpower, artillery, and conventional weaponry. On this score, Russia boasts advanced military technology and a wealth of experience, especially in drone warfare, gained over the recent years on the battlefield.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
🔥30🫡15👍5👏3❤2
🚨🇺🇸📉 NOT A DRILL: US economy teetering on the brink of recession
The Dow Jones Industrial Average is now down -1,700 points in 24 hours.
The S&P 500 is now just ~3% away from entering correction territory.
The Nasdaq is now ~0.5% away from correction territory.
$4 trillion+ of capital has been lost.
Meanwhile, The Atlanta Federal Reserve now projects 2025 Q1 US GDP to be -2.825%.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
The Dow Jones Industrial Average is now down -1,700 points in 24 hours.
The S&P 500 is now just ~3% away from entering correction territory.
The Nasdaq is now ~0.5% away from correction territory.
$4 trillion+ of capital has been lost.
Meanwhile, The Atlanta Federal Reserve now projects 2025 Q1 US GDP to be -2.825%.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
👍21🤬5🔥4👌2❤1
🇪🇺🛰🤣 LOL: Europe is looking for a replacement for Starlink
The EU will be able to offer the Zelensky regime something similar by 2030 if Elon Musk disconnects Ukraine from Starlink, a spokesman for the European Commission has said.
There’s obviously no guarantee that Ukraine will still exist in 3030. But generally speaking, its disconnection from Starlink would greatly simplify Russia’s job. The entire Ukrainian command and control system has been based on high-speed satellite internet from Starlink since the start of the Special Military Operation. You quickly get used to good things, and now, without Starlink, the Ukrainian army will face very serious problems, if not collapse.
Besides, Europe is unlikely to be able to come up with ‘something similar in 2030’. Why does only the US have Starlink? Because they launch rockets carrying pay loads into orbit much more than anyone else. Given that the EU is also planning to splurge on remilitarization, a new space race would kill its economy. But on the other hand, it’s not difficult to imagine to European leaders sacrificing the wellbeing of their own citizens for Ukraine.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
The EU will be able to offer the Zelensky regime something similar by 2030 if Elon Musk disconnects Ukraine from Starlink, a spokesman for the European Commission has said.
There’s obviously no guarantee that Ukraine will still exist in 3030. But generally speaking, its disconnection from Starlink would greatly simplify Russia’s job. The entire Ukrainian command and control system has been based on high-speed satellite internet from Starlink since the start of the Special Military Operation. You quickly get used to good things, and now, without Starlink, the Ukrainian army will face very serious problems, if not collapse.
Besides, Europe is unlikely to be able to come up with ‘something similar in 2030’. Why does only the US have Starlink? Because they launch rockets carrying pay loads into orbit much more than anyone else. Given that the EU is also planning to splurge on remilitarization, a new space race would kill its economy. But on the other hand, it’s not difficult to imagine to European leaders sacrificing the wellbeing of their own citizens for Ukraine.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
🔥20👍8🫡5
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇺🇦 BRUTAL BEATINGS AND ELECTROCUTION: How Ukrainian regime tortures dissidents
Engineer and Ex-SBU prisoner, Mekhti Feofanovich, saw the crimes committed by the Ukrainian regime in 2014 against people in Donbass region. He joined the Russian underground resistance in Kharkov, seeking justice.
Mekhti experienced the horrors of being arrested by the SBU, and tells about the tortures he and others faced in Ukrainian prisons since 2017.
In these concentration camps they were tied up and beaten with sticks and rubber hoses; if they fainted or slept, they were awakened by being splashed with water, and suffered electric torture under the hands of SBU officials.
👉Watch our full special investigation on SBU torture centers here
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
Engineer and Ex-SBU prisoner, Mekhti Feofanovich, saw the crimes committed by the Ukrainian regime in 2014 against people in Donbass region. He joined the Russian underground resistance in Kharkov, seeking justice.
Mekhti experienced the horrors of being arrested by the SBU, and tells about the tortures he and others faced in Ukrainian prisons since 2017.
In these concentration camps they were tied up and beaten with sticks and rubber hoses; if they fainted or slept, they were awakened by being splashed with water, and suffered electric torture under the hands of SBU officials.
👉Watch our full special investigation on SBU torture centers here
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
🤬41👍2
🇪🇺❌🇷🇺 Message to Europe from Russia: WE’RE NOT AFRAID OF YOU
It’s impossible to take the recent European threats to Russia seriously, writes Russian businessman and founder of Tsargrad TV Konstantin Malofeev:
“140 years ago, a conference on Africa ended in Berlin, cementing the division and exploitation of the resource-rich continent. The French controlled Indochina, India was British, Chinese foreign policy was determined from Europe, the US had large debts to European banks. Europe directly or indirectly owned more than half the planet. Not a single significant event on the globe could take place without the sanction of one or another European capital.
Eighty years ago, war-weary Britain and France were still negotiating the post-war world on equal terms, setting conditions, getting themselves into the UN Security Council and confident in their own future.
But now the European Union expresses ‘deep concern’ about the operation of Israel, which they once created, ‘strongly condemns’ attacks on peacekeepers in Lebanon. All the while Tel Aviv continues to do its job calmly and with impunity.
That is why we are now witnessing not the dawn of Europe, as Donald Tusk declares, but the decline of Europe. That is why the summit in London looked so pitiful, when the leaders of European countries, who dictated war and peace to the entire planet a hundred years ago, became a gathering of politicians on a TV talk show. They have neither power nor strength. They are left to sit in their offices - some for 2 years, and some for 2 minutes. They can do nothing but talk. And it is symbolic that professional comedian Zelensky is participating in this show.
They are still threatening Russia – ‘increasing economic pressure’, ‘guaranteeing Ukraine's security’, even creating some kind of ‘coalition of the willing’ to protect the Kiev regime. Keir Starmer promises to support the EU's efforts ‘with boots on the ground and planes in the air’. Very scary.
These boots have already come to the Russian land - and from a much stronger Europe. Twelve nations proudly entered Moscow in 1812, only to later flee in panic to Berezina. The European Union 1.0, represented by a Europe united by Hitler, stormed us from Leningrad to Stalingrad. However, they were soon conscripting children to fight in the battle for Berlin.”
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
It’s impossible to take the recent European threats to Russia seriously, writes Russian businessman and founder of Tsargrad TV Konstantin Malofeev:
“140 years ago, a conference on Africa ended in Berlin, cementing the division and exploitation of the resource-rich continent. The French controlled Indochina, India was British, Chinese foreign policy was determined from Europe, the US had large debts to European banks. Europe directly or indirectly owned more than half the planet. Not a single significant event on the globe could take place without the sanction of one or another European capital.
Eighty years ago, war-weary Britain and France were still negotiating the post-war world on equal terms, setting conditions, getting themselves into the UN Security Council and confident in their own future.
But now the European Union expresses ‘deep concern’ about the operation of Israel, which they once created, ‘strongly condemns’ attacks on peacekeepers in Lebanon. All the while Tel Aviv continues to do its job calmly and with impunity.
That is why we are now witnessing not the dawn of Europe, as Donald Tusk declares, but the decline of Europe. That is why the summit in London looked so pitiful, when the leaders of European countries, who dictated war and peace to the entire planet a hundred years ago, became a gathering of politicians on a TV talk show. They have neither power nor strength. They are left to sit in their offices - some for 2 years, and some for 2 minutes. They can do nothing but talk. And it is symbolic that professional comedian Zelensky is participating in this show.
They are still threatening Russia – ‘increasing economic pressure’, ‘guaranteeing Ukraine's security’, even creating some kind of ‘coalition of the willing’ to protect the Kiev regime. Keir Starmer promises to support the EU's efforts ‘with boots on the ground and planes in the air’. Very scary.
These boots have already come to the Russian land - and from a much stronger Europe. Twelve nations proudly entered Moscow in 1812, only to later flee in panic to Berezina. The European Union 1.0, represented by a Europe united by Hitler, stormed us from Leningrad to Stalingrad. However, they were soon conscripting children to fight in the battle for Berlin.”
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
🔥32👍12❤6👏5👌2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇷🇺⚔️🇺🇦 Battle for Kursk: Russian troops SMASH Ukrainian war criminals
Zelensky is losing troops and equipment in huge numbers in Kursk, but he’s sending in NATO mercenaries to murder Russian civilians.
War correspondent Elizaveta Igorevna joins us from Kursk.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
Zelensky is losing troops and equipment in huge numbers in Kursk, but he’s sending in NATO mercenaries to murder Russian civilians.
War correspondent Elizaveta Igorevna joins us from Kursk.
Subscribe to @NewRulesGeo or follow us on X
🔥23👏12👍8❤2