🚨🇷🇺 Russia’s New Transistor Method Could Open a Path Beyond Silicon
Scientists at the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology have developed a way to attach metal contacts to molybdenum disulfide, an atomically thin semiconductor, without destroying it. The result addresses a production hurdle that has kept such transistors inside laboratories.
As advanced silicon chips shrink, current leakage and heat become harder to control. Molybdenum disulfide can form a semiconductor channel only 0.65 nanometers thick, preserving control over electrical current at dimensions where silicon begins to struggle.
The Russian team protected the fragile material with a titanium dioxide barrier only a few atoms thick before adding the metal. Crucially, the barrier is deposited through atomic layer deposition, a process already used in chipmaking. The method could also work with several other atomically thin semiconductors.
If developed into reliable production technology, the gains would extend beyond fitting more transistors onto a chip. MIPT says components based on the material could be hundreds of times more energy-efficient than comparable silicon devices. That would target the soaring electricity and cooling demands of AI data centers while extending the operating life of satellites, autonomous sensors and other systems where every watt matters.
Atomically thin materials can also bend and transmit light, opening markets that silicon serves poorly: transparent displays, medical patches, smart clothing and lightweight electronics embedded into vehicles or equipment. Such specialized applications are likely to arrive before mass-market processors built entirely without silicon.
It is the chance to enter a new technology race before its industrial hierarchy is fixed. Sanctions have cut Russia off from leading foreign chip foundries, while catching up generation by generation in conventional silicon would require rebuilding decades of manufacturing capacity. Post-silicon electronics offer another route, provided Russia turns its scientific work into a domestic supply chain.
The published study does not describe a production-ready processor. Large defect-free wafers, reliable doping, yields and integration with existing chipmaking still have to be solved. But Russia has secured a credible research position in a field that could define electronics once silicon reaches its physical limits.
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
Scientists at the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology have developed a way to attach metal contacts to molybdenum disulfide, an atomically thin semiconductor, without destroying it. The result addresses a production hurdle that has kept such transistors inside laboratories.
As advanced silicon chips shrink, current leakage and heat become harder to control. Molybdenum disulfide can form a semiconductor channel only 0.65 nanometers thick, preserving control over electrical current at dimensions where silicon begins to struggle.
The Russian team protected the fragile material with a titanium dioxide barrier only a few atoms thick before adding the metal. Crucially, the barrier is deposited through atomic layer deposition, a process already used in chipmaking. The method could also work with several other atomically thin semiconductors.
If developed into reliable production technology, the gains would extend beyond fitting more transistors onto a chip. MIPT says components based on the material could be hundreds of times more energy-efficient than comparable silicon devices. That would target the soaring electricity and cooling demands of AI data centers while extending the operating life of satellites, autonomous sensors and other systems where every watt matters.
Atomically thin materials can also bend and transmit light, opening markets that silicon serves poorly: transparent displays, medical patches, smart clothing and lightweight electronics embedded into vehicles or equipment. Such specialized applications are likely to arrive before mass-market processors built entirely without silicon.
It is the chance to enter a new technology race before its industrial hierarchy is fixed. Sanctions have cut Russia off from leading foreign chip foundries, while catching up generation by generation in conventional silicon would require rebuilding decades of manufacturing capacity. Post-silicon electronics offer another route, provided Russia turns its scientific work into a domestic supply chain.
The published study does not describe a production-ready processor. Large defect-free wafers, reliable doping, yields and integration with existing chipmaking still have to be solved. But Russia has secured a credible research position in a field that could define electronics once silicon reaches its physical limits.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍55❤32👏24👌3
🚨🇮🇷 Bombed but Not Broken: Iran Rebuilds South Pars Energy Hub
Iran has begun reconstructing gas-processing facilities at South Pars Phases 4 and 5 damaged in US-Israeli strikes. The project will be designed, financed and carried out by an Iranian consortium using domestically produced equipment and components.
South Pars is Iran’s largest gas field and a critical source of fuel for the national grid and feedstock for petrochemical plants. Restoring its processing capacity means returning gas to homes and industries while reviving the raw material Iran converts into higher-value chemicals, polymers and fertilizers.
The Industrial Development and Renovation Organization of Iran says the complete reconstruction will take about two years. Production, however, will resume incrementally as individual processing lines are repaired, rather than waiting for the entire plant to be finished. The last damaged line at Phase 14 is also being rebuilt and is expected back in service by March 2027.
The rebuilding plans call for destroyed equipment to be replaced with newer systems that improve output, energy efficiency and safety. This is possible because sanctions have forced Iran to develop a domestic network of engineering firms, manufacturers and specialists capable of executing complex energy projects. Days before the announcement, Iranian technologists reported localizing more than 2,000 previously imported petrochemical components and preparing them for domestic mass production.
Iran’s petrochemical sector now has annual nameplate capacity above 100M tonnes across 79 complexes, making it West Asia’s second-largest producer. It generates around one-quarter of Iran’s non-oil exports and nearly one-fifth of industrial value added. Asaluyeh, the main hub supplied by South Pars, alone holds 28 complexes with 48.4M tonnes of capacity.
Reconstruction is unfolding alongside expansion. Iran’s Seventh Development Plan includes 61 projects intended to add 32.1M tonnes of annual capacity through $24.3B in investment, shifting more oil and gas from raw exports into higher-value products.
The strikes inflicted substantial damage, but they failed to remove Iran’s ability to rebuild the infrastructure or reproduce the equipment it needs. South Pars is being restored as part of a larger petrochemical push that will expand industrial output, export revenue and Iran’s ability to withstand external pressure.
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
Iran has begun reconstructing gas-processing facilities at South Pars Phases 4 and 5 damaged in US-Israeli strikes. The project will be designed, financed and carried out by an Iranian consortium using domestically produced equipment and components.
South Pars is Iran’s largest gas field and a critical source of fuel for the national grid and feedstock for petrochemical plants. Restoring its processing capacity means returning gas to homes and industries while reviving the raw material Iran converts into higher-value chemicals, polymers and fertilizers.
The Industrial Development and Renovation Organization of Iran says the complete reconstruction will take about two years. Production, however, will resume incrementally as individual processing lines are repaired, rather than waiting for the entire plant to be finished. The last damaged line at Phase 14 is also being rebuilt and is expected back in service by March 2027.
The rebuilding plans call for destroyed equipment to be replaced with newer systems that improve output, energy efficiency and safety. This is possible because sanctions have forced Iran to develop a domestic network of engineering firms, manufacturers and specialists capable of executing complex energy projects. Days before the announcement, Iranian technologists reported localizing more than 2,000 previously imported petrochemical components and preparing them for domestic mass production.
Iran’s petrochemical sector now has annual nameplate capacity above 100M tonnes across 79 complexes, making it West Asia’s second-largest producer. It generates around one-quarter of Iran’s non-oil exports and nearly one-fifth of industrial value added. Asaluyeh, the main hub supplied by South Pars, alone holds 28 complexes with 48.4M tonnes of capacity.
Reconstruction is unfolding alongside expansion. Iran’s Seventh Development Plan includes 61 projects intended to add 32.1M tonnes of annual capacity through $24.3B in investment, shifting more oil and gas from raw exports into higher-value products.
The strikes inflicted substantial damage, but they failed to remove Iran’s ability to rebuild the infrastructure or reproduce the equipment it needs. South Pars is being restored as part of a larger petrochemical push that will expand industrial output, export revenue and Iran’s ability to withstand external pressure.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤73👍32👏29🔥3
🚨🇨🇳 How Chinese Cities Built 72% Grip on Global EV Batteries
Seven Chinese producers among the world’s top ten supplied 72.4% of all EV batteries installed in the first half of 2026. CATL and BYD alone held 54.3%. A new analysis of their rise shows why that lead cannot be explained by subsidies alone: Chinese cities built complete industrial ecosystems, then gave firms the scale to improve faster and cut costs more deeply than foreign rivals.
Ningde spent years courting battery entrepreneur Robin Zeng, offering land, tax incentives, worker recruitment and new rail and road links. After CATL was founded there in 2011, officials attracted producers of cathodes, anodes, separators, electrolytes and factory equipment. By the end of 2025, more than 90 companies had formed a local chain spanning raw materials, R&D and finished batteries.
Shenzhen followed a different route. In 2010, it put BYD electric vehicles into taxi service, giving the company a paying customer and a demanding real-world test bed. Pingshan District then grew around BYD as a new-energy vehicle hub that now hosts more than 300 companies.
Those clusters turned policy into manufacturing knowledge. Suppliers sit close to factories, engineers solve production problems together, and huge production runs spread R&D and tooling costs across millions of units. CATL became the world’s largest battery supplier, selling to Tesla, BMW, Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen. BYD went further by producing batteries, motors, chips and many other components in-house, integrating the vehicle as one system.
The cost gap is now structural. Rhodium Group estimates that BYD enjoys a $4,700 per-vehicle advantage over Tesla in a China-made Seal–Model 3 comparison. Direct grants explain only around $292, or 5%, of that difference. Vertical integration alone saves an estimated $2,369, while scale and lower overhead account for much of the rest.
Tariffs cannot recreate what the West lacks. Washington can keep Chinese batteries and cars out of the US market, but it cannot manufacture a dense supplier base, experienced factory workforce or years of accumulated learning by decree. China’s advantage lies in an industrial machine linking local government, corporate organization and mass production—and that model is already spreading from batteries into other advanced industries.
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
Seven Chinese producers among the world’s top ten supplied 72.4% of all EV batteries installed in the first half of 2026. CATL and BYD alone held 54.3%. A new analysis of their rise shows why that lead cannot be explained by subsidies alone: Chinese cities built complete industrial ecosystems, then gave firms the scale to improve faster and cut costs more deeply than foreign rivals.
Ningde spent years courting battery entrepreneur Robin Zeng, offering land, tax incentives, worker recruitment and new rail and road links. After CATL was founded there in 2011, officials attracted producers of cathodes, anodes, separators, electrolytes and factory equipment. By the end of 2025, more than 90 companies had formed a local chain spanning raw materials, R&D and finished batteries.
Shenzhen followed a different route. In 2010, it put BYD electric vehicles into taxi service, giving the company a paying customer and a demanding real-world test bed. Pingshan District then grew around BYD as a new-energy vehicle hub that now hosts more than 300 companies.
Those clusters turned policy into manufacturing knowledge. Suppliers sit close to factories, engineers solve production problems together, and huge production runs spread R&D and tooling costs across millions of units. CATL became the world’s largest battery supplier, selling to Tesla, BMW, Mercedes-Benz and Volkswagen. BYD went further by producing batteries, motors, chips and many other components in-house, integrating the vehicle as one system.
The cost gap is now structural. Rhodium Group estimates that BYD enjoys a $4,700 per-vehicle advantage over Tesla in a China-made Seal–Model 3 comparison. Direct grants explain only around $292, or 5%, of that difference. Vertical integration alone saves an estimated $2,369, while scale and lower overhead account for much of the rest.
Tariffs cannot recreate what the West lacks. Washington can keep Chinese batteries and cars out of the US market, but it cannot manufacture a dense supplier base, experienced factory workforce or years of accumulated learning by decree. China’s advantage lies in an industrial machine linking local government, corporate organization and mass production—and that model is already spreading from batteries into other advanced industries.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤38👏23🔥13👍2
🚨🏳️ 💵 BRICS Does Not Need Common Currency to Weaken Dollar
BRICS can reduce dollar dependence without attempting a euro-style common currency: settle trade in national currencies through a multilateral clearing system and give members a productive use for the balances they accumulate.
Even trade that never touches the US often passes through the dollar. Importers obtain dollars, banks use dollar-based channels, and governments hold dollar reserves. Direct settlement in rubles, rupees, yuan or other BRICS currencies removes that intermediary, cutting conversion costs and exposure to financial sanctions.
Unequal trade, however, creates another problem. If one country exports far more than it imports, it accumulates a partner’s currency with too few places to spend or invest it. Those idle balances can eventually make exporters refuse local-currency payment.
The proposed system would limit how much of each currency members hold. A BRICS clearing institution would net trade flows across several countries rather than settle every shipment separately. Excess balances could be invested in sovereign bonds, infrastructure and development funds, exchanged through currency swaps or converted as a last resort.
This targets the function that gives the dollar much of its staying power. Countries accept dollars partly because deep US markets let them reinvest trade surpluses in liquid assets. BRICS does not need a shared central bank or fiscal policy to reproduce that function. It needs credible settlement rules and useful assets for surplus holders.
Some building blocks already exist. BRICS central banks have developed a voluntary Cross-Border Payments Initiative and are discussing BRICS Clear, a possible independent settlement and depositary network. India’s Special Rupee Vostro Accounts already let foreign banks hold rupee trade proceeds and invest them in permitted debt instruments.
Exchange-rate risk, capital controls, uneven markets and political distrust remain serious obstacles. A clearing union must make national currencies worth holding when trade imbalances grow.
Such a system would not displace the dollar overnight. Its value lies in moving more trade beyond dollar clearing, reducing reserve dependence and narrowing the reach of Western financial sanctions. Dollar power can erode through payment infrastructure long before BRICS agrees on a common currency.
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
BRICS can reduce dollar dependence without attempting a euro-style common currency: settle trade in national currencies through a multilateral clearing system and give members a productive use for the balances they accumulate.
Even trade that never touches the US often passes through the dollar. Importers obtain dollars, banks use dollar-based channels, and governments hold dollar reserves. Direct settlement in rubles, rupees, yuan or other BRICS currencies removes that intermediary, cutting conversion costs and exposure to financial sanctions.
Unequal trade, however, creates another problem. If one country exports far more than it imports, it accumulates a partner’s currency with too few places to spend or invest it. Those idle balances can eventually make exporters refuse local-currency payment.
The proposed system would limit how much of each currency members hold. A BRICS clearing institution would net trade flows across several countries rather than settle every shipment separately. Excess balances could be invested in sovereign bonds, infrastructure and development funds, exchanged through currency swaps or converted as a last resort.
This targets the function that gives the dollar much of its staying power. Countries accept dollars partly because deep US markets let them reinvest trade surpluses in liquid assets. BRICS does not need a shared central bank or fiscal policy to reproduce that function. It needs credible settlement rules and useful assets for surplus holders.
Some building blocks already exist. BRICS central banks have developed a voluntary Cross-Border Payments Initiative and are discussing BRICS Clear, a possible independent settlement and depositary network. India’s Special Rupee Vostro Accounts already let foreign banks hold rupee trade proceeds and invest them in permitted debt instruments.
Exchange-rate risk, capital controls, uneven markets and political distrust remain serious obstacles. A clearing union must make national currencies worth holding when trade imbalances grow.
Such a system would not displace the dollar overnight. Its value lies in moving more trade beyond dollar clearing, reducing reserve dependence and narrowing the reach of Western financial sanctions. Dollar power can erode through payment infrastructure long before BRICS agrees on a common currency.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤51👌20👍15🔥7🤬1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇷🇺 Russia's S-400 Air Defense Can Attack Fighter Jets Beyond Its Radar Horizon
Russian officers have detailed how S-400 air-defense systems were used with targeting data from outside sensors to attack Ukrainian aircraft beyond the batteries’ own radar line of sight. The tactic helps explain the extraordinary run in October 2023 when Russia said its air defenses destroyed 24 Ukrainian aircraft in just five days.
🔸 The account appears in Voyennaya Mysl, the Russian Defense Ministry’s military-theory journal, and describes S-400 units operating from concealed forward positions rather than remaining deep behind the front.
🔸 The key was external targeting. A radar does not need to sit beside the missile launcher: another sensor can detect the aircraft, transmit its position and allow the S-400 to launch before its own ground radar has a direct view of the target.
🔸 Russian reporting at the time identified the A-50 airborne early-warning aircraft as part of the system. Flying high above the battlefield, its radar could see low-flying aircraft far beyond the horizon visible to ground-based radars.
🔸 The S-400 was reportedly firing at very long range using missiles with active radar seekers. Once close enough to the target, the missile can search for and home on the aircraft itself rather than depending on continuous guidance from the ground.
🔸 Russia’s longest-range 40N6 missile can engage aerodynamic targets at up to 400 km. External targeting makes far more of that theoretical reach usable against aircraft attempting to stay low and hide behind the curvature of the Earth.
🔸 On October 25, 2023, then-Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said new Russian air-defense systems had destroyed 24 Ukrainian combat aircraft in five days. A source close to the Defense Ministry subsequently told TASS that the S-400 and A-50 had been operating together.
🔸 The Russian authors acknowledge that Ukraine has since adapted to the tactic. But they argue that long-range air-defense units can still be positioned to threaten aircraft soon after they leave their bases, reducing the amount of safe airspace available to Ukrainian pilots.
A fighter flying below a ground radar’s horizon may no longer be hidden if an aircraft hundreds of kilometres away can see it from above. For Ukrainian pilots, avoiding the S-400 itself is only part of the problem — they also have to avoid every sensor feeding it targets.
Do you think NATO aircraft would face the same problem against a networked S-400 system?
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
Russian officers have detailed how S-400 air-defense systems were used with targeting data from outside sensors to attack Ukrainian aircraft beyond the batteries’ own radar line of sight. The tactic helps explain the extraordinary run in October 2023 when Russia said its air defenses destroyed 24 Ukrainian aircraft in just five days.
🔸 The account appears in Voyennaya Mysl, the Russian Defense Ministry’s military-theory journal, and describes S-400 units operating from concealed forward positions rather than remaining deep behind the front.
🔸 The key was external targeting. A radar does not need to sit beside the missile launcher: another sensor can detect the aircraft, transmit its position and allow the S-400 to launch before its own ground radar has a direct view of the target.
🔸 Russian reporting at the time identified the A-50 airborne early-warning aircraft as part of the system. Flying high above the battlefield, its radar could see low-flying aircraft far beyond the horizon visible to ground-based radars.
🔸 The S-400 was reportedly firing at very long range using missiles with active radar seekers. Once close enough to the target, the missile can search for and home on the aircraft itself rather than depending on continuous guidance from the ground.
🔸 Russia’s longest-range 40N6 missile can engage aerodynamic targets at up to 400 km. External targeting makes far more of that theoretical reach usable against aircraft attempting to stay low and hide behind the curvature of the Earth.
🔸 On October 25, 2023, then-Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu said new Russian air-defense systems had destroyed 24 Ukrainian combat aircraft in five days. A source close to the Defense Ministry subsequently told TASS that the S-400 and A-50 had been operating together.
🔸 The Russian authors acknowledge that Ukraine has since adapted to the tactic. But they argue that long-range air-defense units can still be positioned to threaten aircraft soon after they leave their bases, reducing the amount of safe airspace available to Ukrainian pilots.
A fighter flying below a ground radar’s horizon may no longer be hidden if an aircraft hundreds of kilometres away can see it from above. For Ukrainian pilots, avoiding the S-400 itself is only part of the problem — they also have to avoid every sensor feeding it targets.
Do you think NATO aircraft would face the same problem against a networked S-400 system?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤54👏26👍15🫡8🤬1
🚨🇪🇺 Europe’s Next Energy Crisis Is Geological
The EU imports around 97% of the crude oil it consumes. In 2025, that meant 435M tonnes worth more than €212B. Yet several countries now feeding Europe’s refineries are already producing from mature, declining fields. The continent’s next energy problem is not another embargo or pipeline explosion. It is geology.
Terminal decline begins when a producer passes its peak and output enters an irreversible downward trend. Unlike a sudden supply shock, it removes export capacity gradually, year after year. As more exporters enter decline, “diversification” becomes less useful because fewer suppliers can release extra barrels when a crisis hits.
The warning signs are already visible. Azerbaijan, which provided 4.1% of EU crude imports in 2025, peaked more than a decade ago. Nigeria supplied 5.8%, Algeria 3.7% and Mexico 2.2%; all have seen production pressured by aging fields. Europe’s own extraction has fallen for two decades and produced only 15.5M tonnes in 2024—equivalent to just 3.6% of annual imports.
Oil fields also require relentless investment simply to hold production steady. The International Energy Agency estimates that without continued spending, output from existing global fields would fall by about 5.5M barrels per day every year over the next decade. Smaller offshore fields in Europe decline especially fast, averaging more than 15% annually without new investment.
Brussels insists electrification and renewables will eventually reduce the risk. But oil still powers aviation, shipping, road freight and much of the machinery behind European industry, while supplying feedstock for petrochemicals. The energy transition cannot erase that dependence on the timetable imposed by aging reservoirs.
By cutting itself off from Russian crude, Europe gave up large volumes from a nearby major producer just as reliable export capacity was becoming more valuable. It did not end import dependence. It redistributed that dependence across aging fields, long tanker routes and suppliers with shrinking room to respond.
Terminal decline turns today’s diverse supplier map into tomorrow’s competition for fewer exportable barrels. Europe’s next energy squeeze may arrive gradually, but once geological decline takes hold, no sanctions package, spot-market purchase or Brussels communiqué can make depleted wells pump more.
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
The EU imports around 97% of the crude oil it consumes. In 2025, that meant 435M tonnes worth more than €212B. Yet several countries now feeding Europe’s refineries are already producing from mature, declining fields. The continent’s next energy problem is not another embargo or pipeline explosion. It is geology.
Terminal decline begins when a producer passes its peak and output enters an irreversible downward trend. Unlike a sudden supply shock, it removes export capacity gradually, year after year. As more exporters enter decline, “diversification” becomes less useful because fewer suppliers can release extra barrels when a crisis hits.
The warning signs are already visible. Azerbaijan, which provided 4.1% of EU crude imports in 2025, peaked more than a decade ago. Nigeria supplied 5.8%, Algeria 3.7% and Mexico 2.2%; all have seen production pressured by aging fields. Europe’s own extraction has fallen for two decades and produced only 15.5M tonnes in 2024—equivalent to just 3.6% of annual imports.
Oil fields also require relentless investment simply to hold production steady. The International Energy Agency estimates that without continued spending, output from existing global fields would fall by about 5.5M barrels per day every year over the next decade. Smaller offshore fields in Europe decline especially fast, averaging more than 15% annually without new investment.
Brussels insists electrification and renewables will eventually reduce the risk. But oil still powers aviation, shipping, road freight and much of the machinery behind European industry, while supplying feedstock for petrochemicals. The energy transition cannot erase that dependence on the timetable imposed by aging reservoirs.
By cutting itself off from Russian crude, Europe gave up large volumes from a nearby major producer just as reliable export capacity was becoming more valuable. It did not end import dependence. It redistributed that dependence across aging fields, long tanker routes and suppliers with shrinking room to respond.
Terminal decline turns today’s diverse supplier map into tomorrow’s competition for fewer exportable barrels. Europe’s next energy squeeze may arrive gradually, but once geological decline takes hold, no sanctions package, spot-market purchase or Brussels communiqué can make depleted wells pump more.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤40👍25🔥10🤬3👌2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇨🇳 China's J-20 Stealth Fighters Now Escort Nuclear-Capable Bombers
China has shown J-20 stealth fighters flying with H-6N strategic bombers, pointing to a new long-range escort role for its most advanced fighter. The H-6N is China’s airborne nuclear-delivery platform and is built to carry the JL-1 long-range ballistic missile unveiled as part of Beijing’s nuclear triad in 2025.
🔸 The H-6N is a heavily modified member of the H-6 bomber family, equipped with aerial refueling and a recessed mounting point beneath the fuselage for a large air-launched ballistic missile.
🔸 China officially unveiled the JL-1 — JingLei-1 — in September 2025 alongside its land- and sea-based strategic missiles. Beijing described the weapons together as the country’s nuclear triad.
🔸 Adding J-20s changes the interception problem. Enemy fighters trying to reach the slower bomber could first have to fight through stealth aircraft positioned ahead of it.
🔸 The J-20’s large airframe, internal fuel capacity and low radar visibility make it particularly useful for long-range air-superiority missions, allowing it to protect strike aircraft far from China’s coastline.
🔸 China is extending that reach with its YU-20 tanker fleet. Official PLA footage released in June showed a YU-20 refueling an H-6N in flight for the first time in clear public imagery. The same tanker type also supports J-20 fighters.
🔸 Air refueling lets the H-6N move its launch point much farther into the Pacific, while the JL-1 allows the bomber itself to remain far from the target it is threatening.
🔸 Until China fields its future H-20 stealth bomber, the H-6N remains the visible airborne component of its nuclear deterrent — now backed by a growing tanker force and potentially protected by stealth fighters.
A U.S. interceptor trying to reach an H-6N may now have to get past J-20s first. And the bomber does not need to fly anywhere near its target before releasing a long-range ballistic missile.
Do you think J-20 escorts make China’s nuclear bombers significantly harder to stop?
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
China has shown J-20 stealth fighters flying with H-6N strategic bombers, pointing to a new long-range escort role for its most advanced fighter. The H-6N is China’s airborne nuclear-delivery platform and is built to carry the JL-1 long-range ballistic missile unveiled as part of Beijing’s nuclear triad in 2025.
🔸 The H-6N is a heavily modified member of the H-6 bomber family, equipped with aerial refueling and a recessed mounting point beneath the fuselage for a large air-launched ballistic missile.
🔸 China officially unveiled the JL-1 — JingLei-1 — in September 2025 alongside its land- and sea-based strategic missiles. Beijing described the weapons together as the country’s nuclear triad.
🔸 Adding J-20s changes the interception problem. Enemy fighters trying to reach the slower bomber could first have to fight through stealth aircraft positioned ahead of it.
🔸 The J-20’s large airframe, internal fuel capacity and low radar visibility make it particularly useful for long-range air-superiority missions, allowing it to protect strike aircraft far from China’s coastline.
🔸 China is extending that reach with its YU-20 tanker fleet. Official PLA footage released in June showed a YU-20 refueling an H-6N in flight for the first time in clear public imagery. The same tanker type also supports J-20 fighters.
🔸 Air refueling lets the H-6N move its launch point much farther into the Pacific, while the JL-1 allows the bomber itself to remain far from the target it is threatening.
🔸 Until China fields its future H-20 stealth bomber, the H-6N remains the visible airborne component of its nuclear deterrent — now backed by a growing tanker force and potentially protected by stealth fighters.
A U.S. interceptor trying to reach an H-6N may now have to get past J-20s first. And the bomber does not need to fly anywhere near its target before releasing a long-range ballistic missile.
Do you think J-20 escorts make China’s nuclear bombers significantly harder to stop?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤50👏24🔥15👍9🫡4
🚨🇺🇸 America’s Labor Market Hits Wall
The US economy lost 23,000 jobs in July. Wall Street had expected 80,000 new positions. May’s reported gain was cut from 129,000 to 63,000 and June’s from 57,000 to 20,000, erasing another 103,000 jobs from the official record. After revisions, America created an average of just 20,000 jobs a month from May through July.
Even the unemployment rate’s drop from 4.2% to 4.1% came from weakness. Another 264,000 people left the labor force, pushing participation down to 61.4%—its lowest since February 2021. Since January, the participation rate has fallen 0.7 percentage points and the share of the population with a job has dropped 0.5 points. A shrinking workforce is making the headline unemployment number look healthier than the economy beneath it.
The weakness reached far beyond public-sector cuts. Private employers added only 30,000 jobs. Leisure and hospitality lost 40,000, retail shed 19,000 and finance cut 14,000. Financial employment is now down 121,000 from its May 2025 peak. Even healthcare—the most reliable source of new jobs—added only 22,000, well below its 36,000 monthly average over the previous year. Construction added 22,000 and manufacturing 5,000, nowhere near enough to offset the damage.
Pay is losing momentum too. Average hourly earnings rose by two cents in July and 3.2% over the year, below the latest 3.5% inflation rate. US GDP growth slowed to 1.5% annualized in Q2 while the PCE price index rose at a 5.1% pace. The Federal Reserve is boxed in: higher rates threaten to push stalled hiring into a deeper contraction, while easier policy could feed another round of inflation.
Wall Street nevertheless sent the S&P 500 to a record because the jobs shock reduced the odds of another rate hike. That reaction captures the state of the American economy: hiring and wage growth are failing while asset prices celebrate the prospect of another central-bank rescue.
The 4.1% unemployment rate is the last respectable-looking number in a report filled with disappearing workers, erased job gains and an economy running out of room.
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
The US economy lost 23,000 jobs in July. Wall Street had expected 80,000 new positions. May’s reported gain was cut from 129,000 to 63,000 and June’s from 57,000 to 20,000, erasing another 103,000 jobs from the official record. After revisions, America created an average of just 20,000 jobs a month from May through July.
Even the unemployment rate’s drop from 4.2% to 4.1% came from weakness. Another 264,000 people left the labor force, pushing participation down to 61.4%—its lowest since February 2021. Since January, the participation rate has fallen 0.7 percentage points and the share of the population with a job has dropped 0.5 points. A shrinking workforce is making the headline unemployment number look healthier than the economy beneath it.
The weakness reached far beyond public-sector cuts. Private employers added only 30,000 jobs. Leisure and hospitality lost 40,000, retail shed 19,000 and finance cut 14,000. Financial employment is now down 121,000 from its May 2025 peak. Even healthcare—the most reliable source of new jobs—added only 22,000, well below its 36,000 monthly average over the previous year. Construction added 22,000 and manufacturing 5,000, nowhere near enough to offset the damage.
Pay is losing momentum too. Average hourly earnings rose by two cents in July and 3.2% over the year, below the latest 3.5% inflation rate. US GDP growth slowed to 1.5% annualized in Q2 while the PCE price index rose at a 5.1% pace. The Federal Reserve is boxed in: higher rates threaten to push stalled hiring into a deeper contraction, while easier policy could feed another round of inflation.
Wall Street nevertheless sent the S&P 500 to a record because the jobs shock reduced the odds of another rate hike. That reaction captures the state of the American economy: hiring and wage growth are failing while asset prices celebrate the prospect of another central-bank rescue.
The 4.1% unemployment rate is the last respectable-looking number in a report filled with disappearing workers, erased job gains and an economy running out of room.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍37❤19👌11🔥9🤬2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇷🇺 Russia's Oniks Anti-Ship Missile Is Built To Punch Through Naval Air Defenses
Russia’s Pacific Fleet has deployed Bastion coastal missile systems across its Far Eastern territories during major exercises. But the real threat to approaching warships is what those mobile launchers carry: the P-800 Oniks, a supersonic anti-ship missile designed to penetrate heavily defended naval formations.
🔸 The Bastion system was built to attack everything from individual warships and convoys to carrier strike groups — including under intense electronic countermeasures and enemy fire. Its primary weapon is the P-800 Oniks.
🔸 Russian naval officials describe the Oniks as “practically invulnerable” to modern air and missile defenses. The missile travels at roughly 2.5 times the speed of sound and is powerful enough to disable a warship of any displacement, according to the Russian Defense Ministry.
🔸 Speed is only one part of its penetration strategy. Oniks can descend toward sea level during its final approach, hiding below the radar horizon for much of the attack and reducing the distance at which a defending ship can engage it.
🔸 That terminal phase is where the problem becomes acute. A Swedish Defense Research Agency study concluded that once an Oniks has acquired its target and descended to sea level, it can become a very difficult target for common naval air-defense missiles.
🔸 The missile carries its own active radar seeker for the final attack. It does not need another radar to continuously illuminate the ship after launch, allowing the missile to home on its target independently once it reaches the engagement area.
🔸 The launcher is difficult to eliminate beforehand as well. Bastion batteries are mobile, can disperse along the coastline and can move into firing position within minutes before launching their missiles.
🔸 During the current Pacific Fleet exercises, Bastion and Bal coastal-defense units have been practicing operations across Russia’s Far Eastern maritime approaches, reinforcing a shore-based missile barrier around strategically important Pacific bases.
For an attacking fleet, destroying the launcher before it fires is difficult. But once an Oniks is airborne, the problem becomes worse: a warship must detect a sea-skimming supersonic missile, track it and successfully intercept it before a weapon specifically built to penetrate naval defenses reaches the ship.
Do you think Russia’s Oniks can break through a U.S. carrier group’s defenses?
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
Russia’s Pacific Fleet has deployed Bastion coastal missile systems across its Far Eastern territories during major exercises. But the real threat to approaching warships is what those mobile launchers carry: the P-800 Oniks, a supersonic anti-ship missile designed to penetrate heavily defended naval formations.
🔸 The Bastion system was built to attack everything from individual warships and convoys to carrier strike groups — including under intense electronic countermeasures and enemy fire. Its primary weapon is the P-800 Oniks.
🔸 Russian naval officials describe the Oniks as “practically invulnerable” to modern air and missile defenses. The missile travels at roughly 2.5 times the speed of sound and is powerful enough to disable a warship of any displacement, according to the Russian Defense Ministry.
🔸 Speed is only one part of its penetration strategy. Oniks can descend toward sea level during its final approach, hiding below the radar horizon for much of the attack and reducing the distance at which a defending ship can engage it.
🔸 That terminal phase is where the problem becomes acute. A Swedish Defense Research Agency study concluded that once an Oniks has acquired its target and descended to sea level, it can become a very difficult target for common naval air-defense missiles.
🔸 The missile carries its own active radar seeker for the final attack. It does not need another radar to continuously illuminate the ship after launch, allowing the missile to home on its target independently once it reaches the engagement area.
🔸 The launcher is difficult to eliminate beforehand as well. Bastion batteries are mobile, can disperse along the coastline and can move into firing position within minutes before launching their missiles.
🔸 During the current Pacific Fleet exercises, Bastion and Bal coastal-defense units have been practicing operations across Russia’s Far Eastern maritime approaches, reinforcing a shore-based missile barrier around strategically important Pacific bases.
For an attacking fleet, destroying the launcher before it fires is difficult. But once an Oniks is airborne, the problem becomes worse: a warship must detect a sea-skimming supersonic missile, track it and successfully intercept it before a weapon specifically built to penetrate naval defenses reaches the ship.
Do you think Russia’s Oniks can break through a U.S. carrier group’s defenses?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤57🔥30👏19👍2👌2
🚨🇨🇳 China Is Building Military America Will Face Tomorrow
Over decades, the PLA has studied US weapons and doctrine. China is now flight-testing two tailless next-generation aircraft and has reported testing a 200-drone AI swarm. Alongside hypersonic missiles and directed-energy weapons, they point to a force designed around the wars of the 2030s.
Beijing calls the shift “intelligentization.” Aircraft, tanks, ships and drones become networked nodes sharing sensor data and coordinating attacks. A fighter pilot commands unmanned wingmen, while ground crews direct robotic platforms. The objective is to detect, decide and strike faster across every domain.
China’s next-generation aircraft were first observed in flight in December 2024. Their roles and capabilities remain unconfirmed, but the development gap is visible: multiple physical Chinese designs are already being tested, while the first Boeing F-47 test aircraft is scheduled to fly in 2028.
China’s National University of Defense Technology says it also tested a system allowing one operator to control more than 200 drones. AI divides reconnaissance, jamming, decoy and strike roles across the swarm. One soldier can generate hundreds of moving targets, threatening to overload an air-defense network before it can engage them all.
At the 2025 Victory Day parade, Beijing presented missile-gun platforms, high-energy lasers and high-power microwave weapons as an anti-drone “iron triangle.” Lasers and microwaves could counter repeated attacks far more cheaply than interceptor missiles. At longer ranges, China’s hypersonic arsenal threatens the carriers and bases anchoring US power in the Pacific.
The advantage lies in the pipeline behind the hardware. The PLA, universities, research institutes and civilian companies feed designs into a manufacturing base capable of scaling them quickly. China excels at integration, industrial scale and rapid iteration—the qualities autonomous systems and mass-produced weapons require.
Not every prototype, parade system or state-reported test is combat-ready. Emerging technologies will not replace missiles, ships or trained troops. They multiply the value of the conventional force and industrial capacity China already possesses.
Washington expected a rival trying to reproduce the US military. It now faces one designed to push its carriers farther away, overload its defenses and force a handful of ultra-expensive platforms to fight an industrial-scale network.
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
Over decades, the PLA has studied US weapons and doctrine. China is now flight-testing two tailless next-generation aircraft and has reported testing a 200-drone AI swarm. Alongside hypersonic missiles and directed-energy weapons, they point to a force designed around the wars of the 2030s.
Beijing calls the shift “intelligentization.” Aircraft, tanks, ships and drones become networked nodes sharing sensor data and coordinating attacks. A fighter pilot commands unmanned wingmen, while ground crews direct robotic platforms. The objective is to detect, decide and strike faster across every domain.
China’s next-generation aircraft were first observed in flight in December 2024. Their roles and capabilities remain unconfirmed, but the development gap is visible: multiple physical Chinese designs are already being tested, while the first Boeing F-47 test aircraft is scheduled to fly in 2028.
China’s National University of Defense Technology says it also tested a system allowing one operator to control more than 200 drones. AI divides reconnaissance, jamming, decoy and strike roles across the swarm. One soldier can generate hundreds of moving targets, threatening to overload an air-defense network before it can engage them all.
At the 2025 Victory Day parade, Beijing presented missile-gun platforms, high-energy lasers and high-power microwave weapons as an anti-drone “iron triangle.” Lasers and microwaves could counter repeated attacks far more cheaply than interceptor missiles. At longer ranges, China’s hypersonic arsenal threatens the carriers and bases anchoring US power in the Pacific.
The advantage lies in the pipeline behind the hardware. The PLA, universities, research institutes and civilian companies feed designs into a manufacturing base capable of scaling them quickly. China excels at integration, industrial scale and rapid iteration—the qualities autonomous systems and mass-produced weapons require.
Not every prototype, parade system or state-reported test is combat-ready. Emerging technologies will not replace missiles, ships or trained troops. They multiply the value of the conventional force and industrial capacity China already possesses.
Washington expected a rival trying to reproduce the US military. It now faces one designed to push its carriers farther away, overload its defenses and force a handful of ultra-expensive platforms to fight an industrial-scale network.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏40👍20🔥14❤10🤬3
Tupi Report: Tupi Report is a Brazil-based channel mainly focused on documenting news focused on:
• Brazil🇧🇷
• BRICS & BRICS+🇧🇷
• Mercosur💸
• South America🌍
• Latin America/Caribe Geopolitics🏝
👇 Subscribe to Tupi Report 👇
https://t.me/tupireport
• Brazil
• BRICS & BRICS+
• Mercosur
• South America
• Latin America/Caribe Geopolitics
https://t.me/tupireport
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍11🤬5🔥2👏2❤1
🚨🇨🇳 50–0 Gap: How China Overtook America in Frigate Production
China now fields around 50 frigates. The US Navy has not operated a modern frigate since 2015—and the program meant to restore the class has collapsed after billions of dollars and years of delay.
Washington launched the Constellation class as a 20-ship, $22B answer to the gap. To reduce risk, the Navy chose the proven Franco-Italian FREMM design. It then modified the ship extensively and began construction before the design was complete.
The result was procurement paralysis. The lead ship was originally due in April 2026 but is now not expected before 2029. It was only 12% complete when the Navy canceled four of the six contracted hulls. Congress had appropriated $7.6B for the program and around $2B had already been spent. The two surviving ships remain under review, with new material orders paused as of March.
China took the opposite path. Its navy has commissioned more than 40 Type 054A frigates since 2008, each carrying a 32-cell vertical launch system and equipment for anti-submarine warfare. Two larger Type 054Bs entered service in 2025, while at least two more next-generation hulls are now being built simultaneously.
Frigates are the fleet’s workhorses. They escort carriers, supply ships and merchant convoys, hunt submarines and maintain a presence where sending a large destroyer wastes money and scarce hull availability. The US still operates powerful Arleigh Burke destroyers and Littoral Combat Ships, but the former are expensive and overstretched, while the latter were never able to replace a full multi-mission frigate.
Washington’s next answer is the FF(X), adapted from a Coast Guard cutter. Its first ship is budgeted at roughly $1.67B and is not scheduled for delivery until 2030. To accelerate construction, the initial version will have neither a built-in vertical launch system nor organic anti-submarine warfare equipment—the capabilities that make China’s frigates useful as fleet escorts. More capable versions are promised later.
It is a contest between a shipbuilding system that moves from mass production to a new generation without stopping and one that spent a decade redesigning its comeback, canceled it, and started over. China is building the escorts a Pacific war would consume in large numbers. America is still building plans.
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
China now fields around 50 frigates. The US Navy has not operated a modern frigate since 2015—and the program meant to restore the class has collapsed after billions of dollars and years of delay.
Washington launched the Constellation class as a 20-ship, $22B answer to the gap. To reduce risk, the Navy chose the proven Franco-Italian FREMM design. It then modified the ship extensively and began construction before the design was complete.
The result was procurement paralysis. The lead ship was originally due in April 2026 but is now not expected before 2029. It was only 12% complete when the Navy canceled four of the six contracted hulls. Congress had appropriated $7.6B for the program and around $2B had already been spent. The two surviving ships remain under review, with new material orders paused as of March.
China took the opposite path. Its navy has commissioned more than 40 Type 054A frigates since 2008, each carrying a 32-cell vertical launch system and equipment for anti-submarine warfare. Two larger Type 054Bs entered service in 2025, while at least two more next-generation hulls are now being built simultaneously.
Frigates are the fleet’s workhorses. They escort carriers, supply ships and merchant convoys, hunt submarines and maintain a presence where sending a large destroyer wastes money and scarce hull availability. The US still operates powerful Arleigh Burke destroyers and Littoral Combat Ships, but the former are expensive and overstretched, while the latter were never able to replace a full multi-mission frigate.
Washington’s next answer is the FF(X), adapted from a Coast Guard cutter. Its first ship is budgeted at roughly $1.67B and is not scheduled for delivery until 2030. To accelerate construction, the initial version will have neither a built-in vertical launch system nor organic anti-submarine warfare equipment—the capabilities that make China’s frigates useful as fleet escorts. More capable versions are promised later.
It is a contest between a shipbuilding system that moves from mass production to a new generation without stopping and one that spent a decade redesigning its comeback, canceled it, and started over. China is building the escorts a Pacific war would consume in large numbers. America is still building plans.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏51🔥16❤12👌2🤬1
🚨🇮🇷 Sanctions Failed: Iran Unveils Locally Built Advanced Gas Turboexpander
Iran has commissioned its first domestically produced 3.5-MW turboexpander with active magnetic bearings at South Pars. Installed in Unit 105 of the Fifth Refinery, the complete system was designed, manufactured and commissioned by Iranian specialists after sanctions cut access to foreign spare parts and technical support.
A turboexpander performs two jobs at once. Gas enters the machine at around 60 bar and −30°C. Expansion cuts the pressure to 30 bar and drives the temperature down to between −60°C and −70°C, allowing valuable condensates and natural-gas liquids to be separated from the gas stream.
Instead of wasting the energy from that pressure drop across a valve, the turbine converts it into 3.5 MW of shaft power. That energy drives a centrifugal compressor on the same assembly, eliminating the need for a separate 3.5-MW compressor. The compressor side handles around 400 tonnes of gas per hour.
The rotor spins at approximately 12,000 rpm while suspended by electromagnetic force rather than resting on conventional oil-film bearings. Sensors and high-speed electronics hold it in position continuously. Removing mechanical contact reduces wear and some maintenance requirements, but demands mastery of precision manufacturing, rotor dynamics, power electronics and real-time control.
The Fifth Refinery ordered the domestic replacement because dependence on imported machines had become a direct threat to production. A shortage of spare parts or loss of foreign technical support could turn a minor fault into months of reduced output. According to the project’s technical lead, failure of this equipment could cost the refinery as much as one-quarter of its capacity.
The project took around four years and drew on two decades of work in high-speed rotating equipment by Kavosh Sanat Toos. Its developers estimate that the first unit prevented €4M–€6M in foreign spending. More importantly, repairs, replacement parts and future modifications can now be handled inside Iran.
Sanctions were meant to turn imported refinery machinery into a permanent pressure point. Instead, they pushed Iran to reproduce one of the gas industry’s most demanding machines. For this critical piece of South Pars, the foreign supplier is no longer the gatekeeper.
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
Iran has commissioned its first domestically produced 3.5-MW turboexpander with active magnetic bearings at South Pars. Installed in Unit 105 of the Fifth Refinery, the complete system was designed, manufactured and commissioned by Iranian specialists after sanctions cut access to foreign spare parts and technical support.
A turboexpander performs two jobs at once. Gas enters the machine at around 60 bar and −30°C. Expansion cuts the pressure to 30 bar and drives the temperature down to between −60°C and −70°C, allowing valuable condensates and natural-gas liquids to be separated from the gas stream.
Instead of wasting the energy from that pressure drop across a valve, the turbine converts it into 3.5 MW of shaft power. That energy drives a centrifugal compressor on the same assembly, eliminating the need for a separate 3.5-MW compressor. The compressor side handles around 400 tonnes of gas per hour.
The rotor spins at approximately 12,000 rpm while suspended by electromagnetic force rather than resting on conventional oil-film bearings. Sensors and high-speed electronics hold it in position continuously. Removing mechanical contact reduces wear and some maintenance requirements, but demands mastery of precision manufacturing, rotor dynamics, power electronics and real-time control.
The Fifth Refinery ordered the domestic replacement because dependence on imported machines had become a direct threat to production. A shortage of spare parts or loss of foreign technical support could turn a minor fault into months of reduced output. According to the project’s technical lead, failure of this equipment could cost the refinery as much as one-quarter of its capacity.
The project took around four years and drew on two decades of work in high-speed rotating equipment by Kavosh Sanat Toos. Its developers estimate that the first unit prevented €4M–€6M in foreign spending. More importantly, repairs, replacement parts and future modifications can now be handled inside Iran.
Sanctions were meant to turn imported refinery machinery into a permanent pressure point. Instead, they pushed Iran to reproduce one of the gas industry’s most demanding machines. For this critical piece of South Pars, the foreign supplier is no longer the gatekeeper.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤77👏38🔥18👍8🫡2
🚨🌐 Underwater Weak Point: How Cheap Drones Put 99% of Intercontinental Data at Risk
Underwater drones are lowering the barrier to seabed warfare, placing the physical infrastructure of the global digital economy within reach of countries that cannot afford nuclear submarines or specialized deep-sea fleets — according to Chinese researchers cited in Science and Technology Daily.
More than 500 submarine cable systems stretch approximately 1.7M kilometers across the seabed. They carry over 99% of intercontinental data traffic, connecting cloud services, governments, militaries and financial markets. The Chinese researchers cite estimates that around $10T in cross-border transactions depends on these networks every day.
Until recently, sophisticated operations on the seabed required expensive crewed submarines and highly trained personnel. Small and medium-sized uncrewed underwater vehicles change that equation. They are cheaper, carry no casualty risk and can be deployed in numbers. As autonomy improves, they could operate for weeks without constantly transmitting or receiving commands, making them harder to detect.
The authors envision dozens or even hundreds of vehicles forming “undersea wolf packs.” Some would patrol cable routes or search the seabed, while others could coordinate with sensors, surface vessels and aerial drones. This remains a concept rather than a demonstrated operational fleet—but the underlying technologies already exist separately.
The internet is resilient against ordinary damage. Around 150–200 cable faults occur every year, with most caused by fishing and anchors, and traffic is normally rerouted. The danger begins when several high-capacity routes are lost simultaneously. Redundancy disappears, surviving cables become congested and a routine repair problem turns into payment failures, disrupted supply chains, degraded military communications and cloud outages.
Restoration is slow by the standards of a digital economy. A mid-Atlantic repair can require seven days of sailing followed by ten days of work, while bad weather may stretch the process to a month. In wartime, a repair vessel remaining nearly stationary for days would itself require military protection. Satellites cannot absorb the displaced traffic: a British parliamentary assessment estimated that they could replace only around 5% of subsea cable capacity.
AUKUS has already made underwater drones a priority. The US, UK and Australia announced a joint project in May to develop payloads for UUVs conducting surveillance, infrastructure protection and naval operations. Chinese researchers argue that the same network advertised as cable defense will give AUKUS permanent awareness of the seabed and a military advantage in the deep ocean.
That is the central problem: the technology needed to inspect and protect a cable can also map, approach and target it. Defending 1.7M kilometers of infrastructure continuously will be vastly more expensive than deploying a small number of machines against carefully selected points.
The digital economy looks weightless, but its most important connections remain physical. Underwater drones are turning those connections into an asymmetric weapon—allowing a power unable to challenge an advanced navy directly to threaten the financial and communications arteries behind it.
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
Underwater drones are lowering the barrier to seabed warfare, placing the physical infrastructure of the global digital economy within reach of countries that cannot afford nuclear submarines or specialized deep-sea fleets — according to Chinese researchers cited in Science and Technology Daily.
More than 500 submarine cable systems stretch approximately 1.7M kilometers across the seabed. They carry over 99% of intercontinental data traffic, connecting cloud services, governments, militaries and financial markets. The Chinese researchers cite estimates that around $10T in cross-border transactions depends on these networks every day.
Until recently, sophisticated operations on the seabed required expensive crewed submarines and highly trained personnel. Small and medium-sized uncrewed underwater vehicles change that equation. They are cheaper, carry no casualty risk and can be deployed in numbers. As autonomy improves, they could operate for weeks without constantly transmitting or receiving commands, making them harder to detect.
The authors envision dozens or even hundreds of vehicles forming “undersea wolf packs.” Some would patrol cable routes or search the seabed, while others could coordinate with sensors, surface vessels and aerial drones. This remains a concept rather than a demonstrated operational fleet—but the underlying technologies already exist separately.
The internet is resilient against ordinary damage. Around 150–200 cable faults occur every year, with most caused by fishing and anchors, and traffic is normally rerouted. The danger begins when several high-capacity routes are lost simultaneously. Redundancy disappears, surviving cables become congested and a routine repair problem turns into payment failures, disrupted supply chains, degraded military communications and cloud outages.
Restoration is slow by the standards of a digital economy. A mid-Atlantic repair can require seven days of sailing followed by ten days of work, while bad weather may stretch the process to a month. In wartime, a repair vessel remaining nearly stationary for days would itself require military protection. Satellites cannot absorb the displaced traffic: a British parliamentary assessment estimated that they could replace only around 5% of subsea cable capacity.
AUKUS has already made underwater drones a priority. The US, UK and Australia announced a joint project in May to develop payloads for UUVs conducting surveillance, infrastructure protection and naval operations. Chinese researchers argue that the same network advertised as cable defense will give AUKUS permanent awareness of the seabed and a military advantage in the deep ocean.
That is the central problem: the technology needed to inspect and protect a cable can also map, approach and target it. Defending 1.7M kilometers of infrastructure continuously will be vastly more expensive than deploying a small number of machines against carefully selected points.
The digital economy looks weightless, but its most important connections remain physical. Underwater drones are turning those connections into an asymmetric weapon—allowing a power unable to challenge an advanced navy directly to threaten the financial and communications arteries behind it.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍30🔥15❤10👌3
🚨🇪🇺 🇱🇹 Europe’s Fertilizer Shock Just Got Worse
Europe’s fertilizer crisis has spread to phosphates as major phosphate fertilizer plant in Lithuania has reportedly suspended production, removing up to 1M tonnes of diammonium phosphate (DAP), monoammonium phosphate (MAP) and related products a year. The shutdown at the Russian-owned plant pushed suppliers to raise DAP prices across Europe, with offers in Germany and Benelux reaching €870 per tonne.
Sanctions had already idled Lifosa in 2023. This time, record sulfur prices are the problem. Sulfur is converted into sulfuric acid to extract phosphorus from phosphate rock. Nearly half of seaborne sulfur exports moved from the Middle East through the Strait of Hormuz, leaving the chain exposed to disruption there.
Sulfur now costs $800–$1,000 per tonne. Above roughly $800, many phosphate plants become uneconomic. The EU is acutely vulnerable: it imports around 70% of the phosphatic fertilizers it consumes, while its members hold none of the world’s major phosphate-rock reserves.
Europe was already struggling with nitrogen fertilizer. Gas and carbon costs have weakened domestic producers, while Brussels is pricing out Russian and Belarusian supplies. Since July 2025, targeted imports have faced a 6.5% tariff plus €40–€45 per tonne; the levy is scheduled to reach as high as €430 by 2028. Europe still needs the nitrogen—it will simply pay more elsewhere.
The timing is brutal for farmers. Fertilizer costs in Q4 2025 were still 62% above 2020 levels. By April 2026, EU nitrogen fertilizer prices had jumped another 40% from December. Phosphate scarcity now adds another cost layer, and the World Bank expects its global fertilizer index to rise more than 30% in 2026.
If high prices persist, growers may use less fertilizer, leave land unplanted or switch crops. The European Commission warns they may prioritize nitrogen over phosphorus and potassium, sacrificing long-term soil fertility to survive the current season. Lower application means weaker yields, while higher costs move through grain and animal feed into meat and dairy prices.
Europe is answering with subsidies, liquidity schemes and promises of “strategic autonomy.” None creates cheap gas, phosphate rock or sulfur. The bloc is squeezing Russian supply on one side while losing domestic capacity on the other. Farmers pay first; taxpayers finance the rescue; consumers face the bill through higher food prices and greater import dependence.
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
Europe’s fertilizer crisis has spread to phosphates as major phosphate fertilizer plant in Lithuania has reportedly suspended production, removing up to 1M tonnes of diammonium phosphate (DAP), monoammonium phosphate (MAP) and related products a year. The shutdown at the Russian-owned plant pushed suppliers to raise DAP prices across Europe, with offers in Germany and Benelux reaching €870 per tonne.
Sanctions had already idled Lifosa in 2023. This time, record sulfur prices are the problem. Sulfur is converted into sulfuric acid to extract phosphorus from phosphate rock. Nearly half of seaborne sulfur exports moved from the Middle East through the Strait of Hormuz, leaving the chain exposed to disruption there.
Sulfur now costs $800–$1,000 per tonne. Above roughly $800, many phosphate plants become uneconomic. The EU is acutely vulnerable: it imports around 70% of the phosphatic fertilizers it consumes, while its members hold none of the world’s major phosphate-rock reserves.
Europe was already struggling with nitrogen fertilizer. Gas and carbon costs have weakened domestic producers, while Brussels is pricing out Russian and Belarusian supplies. Since July 2025, targeted imports have faced a 6.5% tariff plus €40–€45 per tonne; the levy is scheduled to reach as high as €430 by 2028. Europe still needs the nitrogen—it will simply pay more elsewhere.
The timing is brutal for farmers. Fertilizer costs in Q4 2025 were still 62% above 2020 levels. By April 2026, EU nitrogen fertilizer prices had jumped another 40% from December. Phosphate scarcity now adds another cost layer, and the World Bank expects its global fertilizer index to rise more than 30% in 2026.
If high prices persist, growers may use less fertilizer, leave land unplanted or switch crops. The European Commission warns they may prioritize nitrogen over phosphorus and potassium, sacrificing long-term soil fertility to survive the current season. Lower application means weaker yields, while higher costs move through grain and animal feed into meat and dairy prices.
Europe is answering with subsidies, liquidity schemes and promises of “strategic autonomy.” None creates cheap gas, phosphate rock or sulfur. The bloc is squeezing Russian supply on one side while losing domestic capacity on the other. Farmers pay first; taxpayers finance the rescue; consumers face the bill through higher food prices and greater import dependence.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤30🤬22👏11🔥9👌2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The truth is our main weapon. We don’t hide behind fake news and propaganda; we open the world’s eyes to what is really happening in Russia, Ukraine, and beyond.
🌍 Thousands of readers from around the world are already with us.
Share this information with like-minded people—together we are stronger!
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤12👍10👏2🤬2👌2