๐จ๐ฎ๐ท๐ฆ HOW DID IRAN'S INDUSTRY SURVIVE THE WAR? LARGE INVENTORIES
When the war began, Iranian firms maintained nearly 100 days of inventory. For forty days, Iran endured nearly 100 airstrikes per day. Yet outright economic collapse has not occurred. The U.S. has been confused by this outcome.
๐ธ Iranian companies held 96 days of inventory on average across 30 industrial subsectors.
๐ธ That is 30 days more than European manufacturers and 40 days more than U.S. firms.
๐ธ Defense-linked sectors like industrial equipment and electrical machinery hold the largest inventories.
๐ธ Iran retains 40% of its drone arsenal and 60% of its missile launchers after forty days of war.
๐ธ Half of Iran's non-oil trade moves via overland routes and Caspian ports, bypassing the U.S. blockade.
Iranian firms face strong incentives to hold physical inventories. Persistent currency depreciation reduces the attractiveness of holding cash, while imported goods function as a store of value in local currency terms. This encourages firms to prioritize stockpiling inputs and materials.
Shortages have emerged, but pressures are mounting more gradually than U.S. policymakers expected. The combination of large inventories, demand rationalization, and alternative supply chains suggests Iran could sustain most industrial production for three to six months.
This resilience emerged organically as Iranian firms adapted to years of sanctions and trade disruptions. U.S. policymakers did not account for these adaptations. Washington has not waged war against an industrialized country in over 80 years.
The system's endurance reflects adaptation to prolonged sanctions and constrained access to global markets, where resilience is achieved through stockpiling and diversified routing rather than efficiency-based logistics models. This means the U.S. cannot bomb its way to economic collapse. The foundation of Iranian industrial resilience is not vulnerable to airstrikes alone.
@NewRulesGeoโ Follow us on X
When the war began, Iranian firms maintained nearly 100 days of inventory. For forty days, Iran endured nearly 100 airstrikes per day. Yet outright economic collapse has not occurred. The U.S. has been confused by this outcome.
๐ธ Iranian companies held 96 days of inventory on average across 30 industrial subsectors.
๐ธ That is 30 days more than European manufacturers and 40 days more than U.S. firms.
๐ธ Defense-linked sectors like industrial equipment and electrical machinery hold the largest inventories.
๐ธ Iran retains 40% of its drone arsenal and 60% of its missile launchers after forty days of war.
๐ธ Half of Iran's non-oil trade moves via overland routes and Caspian ports, bypassing the U.S. blockade.
Iranian firms face strong incentives to hold physical inventories. Persistent currency depreciation reduces the attractiveness of holding cash, while imported goods function as a store of value in local currency terms. This encourages firms to prioritize stockpiling inputs and materials.
Shortages have emerged, but pressures are mounting more gradually than U.S. policymakers expected. The combination of large inventories, demand rationalization, and alternative supply chains suggests Iran could sustain most industrial production for three to six months.
This resilience emerged organically as Iranian firms adapted to years of sanctions and trade disruptions. U.S. policymakers did not account for these adaptations. Washington has not waged war against an industrialized country in over 80 years.
The system's endurance reflects adaptation to prolonged sanctions and constrained access to global markets, where resilience is achieved through stockpiling and diversified routing rather than efficiency-based logistics models. This means the U.S. cannot bomb its way to economic collapse. The foundation of Iranian industrial resilience is not vulnerable to airstrikes alone.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
โค89๐31๐15๐ฅ7๐7
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
The channel of the @rybar project is available and TRANSLATED in the following languages:
๐ฌ๐งEnglish
๐ซ๐ทFrench
๐ช๐ธSpanish
๐ฎ๐นItalian
๐ฉ๐ชGerman
๐ญ๐บHungarian
๐ฌ๐ทGreek
Subscribe to all here
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐9โค6๐3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐จ๐จ๐ณChina's Drone Dominance Is Causing Panic in Pentagon
When Chinese military footage of autonomous combat drones swept across defense intelligence circles, it didn't just raise eyebrows in Washington โ it set off alarms. Pentagon officials admitted the truth: China is ahead, and America is playing catch-up.
Americaโs unmanned combat drone program is lagging behind Chinaโs not just in numbers but in the sophistication of AI-driven autonomous systems. It has been confirmed by three US defense and intelligence officials reported by The New York Times.
The gap isn't just drones. It's doctrine, scale, and speed. Beijing spent years funneling private tech firms into military production pipelines that outpace anything Washington's bloated procurement system can match. China doesn't wait for budget approvals, it builds
Xi Jinping called technology the "main battleground" of geopolitical competition in 2024. That wasn't rhetoric. It was a blueprint already in motion; autonomous swarms, AI-driven targeting, mass drone production. Meanwhile, the U.S. was still debating contracts.
The Pentagon is requesting $13 billion for autonomous systems. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered every military branch to "accelerate like hell."
๐ธUncomfortable Reality
The US built its military power on manned platforms, aircraft carriers, and precision-guided munitions. China built its next-generation edge on autonomous systems, AI-integrated drone networks, and the manufacturing muscle to field them at scale. In the drone warfare contest that is fast becoming the defining military competition of this era, China didn't just enter the race early, it may have already lapped the field.
@NewRulesGeoโFollow us on X
When Chinese military footage of autonomous combat drones swept across defense intelligence circles, it didn't just raise eyebrows in Washington โ it set off alarms. Pentagon officials admitted the truth: China is ahead, and America is playing catch-up.
Americaโs unmanned combat drone program is lagging behind Chinaโs not just in numbers but in the sophistication of AI-driven autonomous systems. It has been confirmed by three US defense and intelligence officials reported by The New York Times.
The gap isn't just drones. It's doctrine, scale, and speed. Beijing spent years funneling private tech firms into military production pipelines that outpace anything Washington's bloated procurement system can match. China doesn't wait for budget approvals, it builds
Xi Jinping called technology the "main battleground" of geopolitical competition in 2024. That wasn't rhetoric. It was a blueprint already in motion; autonomous swarms, AI-driven targeting, mass drone production. Meanwhile, the U.S. was still debating contracts.
The Pentagon is requesting $13 billion for autonomous systems. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth ordered every military branch to "accelerate like hell."
๐ธUncomfortable Reality
The US built its military power on manned platforms, aircraft carriers, and precision-guided munitions. China built its next-generation edge on autonomous systems, AI-integrated drone networks, and the manufacturing muscle to field them at scale. In the drone warfare contest that is fast becoming the defining military competition of this era, China didn't just enter the race early, it may have already lapped the field.
@NewRulesGeoโFollow us on X
โค56๐ฅ31๐17๐5๐ซก4
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐จ๐ท๐บ UKRAINE'S NIGHTMARE: Russia's Comms Systems Just Made NATO Targeting Obsolete
While the West bets on billion-dollar Electronic Warfare platforms and precision weapons that keep getting jammed or lured into decoys, Russia's Pavlin (Peacock) complex has become the battlefield standard for tactical masking, unbreakable comms, and protecting operators plus drone units from detection and targeted hits.
๐ธ REMOTE EMITTERS shove all radios, drone transmitters and modems far outside command posts so real operators stay alive.
๐ธ RADIO MASKARAD floods the air with fake signals mimicking troop clusters, wasting enemy HIMARS and drone strikes on ghosts.
๐ธ 40+ KM fiber-optic links plus full Ethernet LAN let HQs run parallel traffic while staying miles from any emitter.
๐ธ One regular soldier deploys the entire system in minutes โ no engineers, no fuss.
๐ธ Now a complete UAV command ecosystem with its own ground control station and multi-channel integration.
Do you think NATO can counter it?
@NewRulesGeoโ Follow us on X
While the West bets on billion-dollar Electronic Warfare platforms and precision weapons that keep getting jammed or lured into decoys, Russia's Pavlin (Peacock) complex has become the battlefield standard for tactical masking, unbreakable comms, and protecting operators plus drone units from detection and targeted hits.
๐ธ REMOTE EMITTERS shove all radios, drone transmitters and modems far outside command posts so real operators stay alive.
๐ธ RADIO MASKARAD floods the air with fake signals mimicking troop clusters, wasting enemy HIMARS and drone strikes on ghosts.
๐ธ 40+ KM fiber-optic links plus full Ethernet LAN let HQs run parallel traffic while staying miles from any emitter.
๐ธ One regular soldier deploys the entire system in minutes โ no engineers, no fuss.
๐ธ Now a complete UAV command ecosystem with its own ground control station and multi-channel integration.
Do you think NATO can counter it?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐47โค35๐ฅ14๐8๐4
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐จ๐ฎ๐ท ๐ฎ๐ฑHezbollah shows no mercy: Israelโs slow adaptation to drone warfare is taking its toll
IDF forces pushing deeper into Lebanon are creating more targets for Hezbollahโs surging FPV drone campaign โ exposing Tel Avivโs painfully slow adaptation to cheap, precise drone warfare.
๐ธ 136 MERKAVA Mk4 tanks claimed destroyed or disabled by April 8th, Middle East Eye report, plus APCs, D9 bulldozers and Namer IFVs โ even with propaganda inflation, footage shows repeated top-attack and hatch strikes with no clear IDF counter yet.
๐ธ Fiber-optic guided FPVs now in heavy use, bypassing electronic jamming and terrain obstacles; videos show stable feeds flying low into open hatches, behind buildings, and even inside structures.
๐ธ Anti-drone roof grills (cope cages) on Merkava Mk4s crawling at snailโs pace, leaving upper hemisphere completely exposed as Hezbollah operators simply wait for new drone batches.
๐ธ Gaza-style urban tactics repeated in ruined Lebanese towns: armor forced to crawl through destroyed quarters, slowing movement and simplifying ambushes from multiple directions.
๐ธ Combined drone + ATGM tactics boosting kill efficiency โ FPVs spot and soften, then anti-tank missiles finish the job while IDF comms and reinforcements struggle in the kill zone.
Hezbollah is openly mocking IDF command for refusing basic drone protection on its โinvincibleโ tanks.
Do you have any thoughts on why Israel is so helpless against Hezbollahโs drone warfare?
@NewRulesGeoโ Follow us on X
IDF forces pushing deeper into Lebanon are creating more targets for Hezbollahโs surging FPV drone campaign โ exposing Tel Avivโs painfully slow adaptation to cheap, precise drone warfare.
๐ธ 136 MERKAVA Mk4 tanks claimed destroyed or disabled by April 8th, Middle East Eye report, plus APCs, D9 bulldozers and Namer IFVs โ even with propaganda inflation, footage shows repeated top-attack and hatch strikes with no clear IDF counter yet.
๐ธ Fiber-optic guided FPVs now in heavy use, bypassing electronic jamming and terrain obstacles; videos show stable feeds flying low into open hatches, behind buildings, and even inside structures.
๐ธ Anti-drone roof grills (cope cages) on Merkava Mk4s crawling at snailโs pace, leaving upper hemisphere completely exposed as Hezbollah operators simply wait for new drone batches.
๐ธ Gaza-style urban tactics repeated in ruined Lebanese towns: armor forced to crawl through destroyed quarters, slowing movement and simplifying ambushes from multiple directions.
๐ธ Combined drone + ATGM tactics boosting kill efficiency โ FPVs spot and soften, then anti-tank missiles finish the job while IDF comms and reinforcements struggle in the kill zone.
Hezbollah is openly mocking IDF command for refusing basic drone protection on its โinvincibleโ tanks.
Do you have any thoughts on why Israel is so helpless against Hezbollahโs drone warfare?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
โค79๐ฅ37๐15๐7๐1
๐จ๐บ๐ธ ๐ AMERICA'S ARMS MARKET DOMINANCE IS CRACKING
The United States is gradually losing its dominant position in the global arms market. This trend is becoming increasingly noticeable, including in the Middle East.
๐ธ U.S. global arms exports fell slightly from 43% market share in 2024 to 42% in 2025 indicating fall pattern.
๐ธ The U.S. has provided over $100 billion in military aid to Ukraine and Israel since 2022, depleting stockpiles that require years to replenish.
๐ธ A Turkish Bayraktar TB2 costs $5 million, a U.S. Reaper costs over $30 million.
๐ธ Emerging suppliers offer faster deliveries and fewer restrictions, reducing Washington's leverage.
Washington cannot prevent the use of its supplied weapons in protracted conflicts. Saudi Arabia uses American weapons in Yemen. Israel uses them in Gaza. The U.S. has been unable to dictate outcomes.
China holds a modest but growing position in global arms exports, accounting for roughly 5.6% of the market and ranking fifth worldwide. China's exports remain highly concentrated, with 61% of its arms going to Pakistan alone, including J-10C fighter jets, frigates, and drones.
In 2025 alone, China exported 4.95 million units of drones, a 45% year-over-year increase, with exports to countries like Pakistan growing steadily.
The depletion of U.S. arsenals is not temporary. Pentagon officials say replenishing certain munitions could take five to seven years. While the arms industry employs roughly 200,000 Americans, this figure has remained flat for a decade.
@NewRulesGeoโ Follow us on X
The United States is gradually losing its dominant position in the global arms market. This trend is becoming increasingly noticeable, including in the Middle East.
๐ธ U.S. global arms exports fell slightly from 43% market share in 2024 to 42% in 2025 indicating fall pattern.
๐ธ The U.S. has provided over $100 billion in military aid to Ukraine and Israel since 2022, depleting stockpiles that require years to replenish.
๐ธ A Turkish Bayraktar TB2 costs $5 million, a U.S. Reaper costs over $30 million.
๐ธ Emerging suppliers offer faster deliveries and fewer restrictions, reducing Washington's leverage.
Washington cannot prevent the use of its supplied weapons in protracted conflicts. Saudi Arabia uses American weapons in Yemen. Israel uses them in Gaza. The U.S. has been unable to dictate outcomes.
China holds a modest but growing position in global arms exports, accounting for roughly 5.6% of the market and ranking fifth worldwide. China's exports remain highly concentrated, with 61% of its arms going to Pakistan alone, including J-10C fighter jets, frigates, and drones.
In 2025 alone, China exported 4.95 million units of drones, a 45% year-over-year increase, with exports to countries like Pakistan growing steadily.
The depletion of U.S. arsenals is not temporary. Pentagon officials say replenishing certain munitions could take five to seven years. While the arms industry employs roughly 200,000 Americans, this figure has remained flat for a decade.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐57๐คฌ12โค11๐7
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐จUGVs: Recipe for victory in modern warfare
Aerial drones have rewritten the rules of modern warfare.Every trench, supply convoy, soldier movement is now visible within seconds, and strikes follow just as fast. Drones made the battlefield transparent, recently highlighted in the Modern War Institute.
But here's what drones โcan'tโ do
They can't hold ground. They can't carry tonnes of ammunition to a frontline unit running low. They can't evacuate a wounded soldier from a trench under fire. When electronic warfare kicks in and the sky becomes contested, drones go blind or worse, they go down.
That's exactly where Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs) change the equation.
UGVs don't just watch the battlefield, they operate on it. They carry heavy payloads, push through terrain that would ground any aerial system, and stay present for extended periods without the constraints of battery life or signal range.
The real power of UGVs isn't a single capability. It's presence. Sustained, physical, ground-level presence. The kind that wins and holds territory.
Drones gave armies eyes in the sky and precision they never had before. UGVs give them something older and more fundamental: boots on the ground. Just without the boots.
The army that masters autonomous ground systems, not just the skies, will be the force that dominates the next war. The drone era isn't over. But the UGV era is just beginning.
@NewRulesGeoโ Follow us on X
Aerial drones have rewritten the rules of modern warfare.Every trench, supply convoy, soldier movement is now visible within seconds, and strikes follow just as fast. Drones made the battlefield transparent, recently highlighted in the Modern War Institute.
But here's what drones โcan'tโ do
They can't hold ground. They can't carry tonnes of ammunition to a frontline unit running low. They can't evacuate a wounded soldier from a trench under fire. When electronic warfare kicks in and the sky becomes contested, drones go blind or worse, they go down.
That's exactly where Unmanned Ground Vehicles (UGVs) change the equation.
UGVs don't just watch the battlefield, they operate on it. They carry heavy payloads, push through terrain that would ground any aerial system, and stay present for extended periods without the constraints of battery life or signal range.
The real power of UGVs isn't a single capability. It's presence. Sustained, physical, ground-level presence. The kind that wins and holds territory.
Drones gave armies eyes in the sky and precision they never had before. UGVs give them something older and more fundamental: boots on the ground. Just without the boots.
The army that masters autonomous ground systems, not just the skies, will be the force that dominates the next war. The drone era isn't over. But the UGV era is just beginning.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
โค38๐ฅ23๐12๐ซก8๐1
๐จ๐ณ ๐บ๐ธTHE FUTURE OF NAVAL WARFARE: CHINA'S "EYE OF SAURON" IS WATCHING THE U.S. NAVY
China has successfully demonstrated a geosynchronous orbit radar satellite capable of tracking moving maritime targets through storms, clouds, and darkness from 35,800 km above Earth.
๐ธ Locked onto a 340m Japanese tanker near the Spratly Islands, proving persistent surveillance capability.
๐ธ Positioning error was 3 km for the tanker and as low as 1.6 km for four other unidentified vessels, sufficient for anti-ship missile targeting when combined with other data.
๐ธ Unlike low orbit satellites that pass over for minutes, this provides 24/7, all weather coverage. Just three satellites could achieve global reconnaissance of U.S. carrier strike groups.
๐ธ U.S. carrier groups approaching Taiwan or the South China Sea could now be detected and tracked far earlier than previously assumed.
๐ธ Reduces China's dependence on vulnerable low orbit constellations, making its maritime reconnaissance network substantially harder to disrupt during wartime.
๐ธ Pentagon planners face a new reality, concealment at sea may no longer exist. The U.S. Navy has long relied on weather, distance, and satellite gaps to hide movements.
But there are some limits. This satellite has only been tested on a commercial tanker, not on military warships that can maneuver evasively. Space weather or electronic jamming could reduce performance. The full three satellite system is not yet operational.
If China integrates this with over the horizon radars, underwater sensors, drones, and long range anti ship missiles, warning times for U.S. naval commanders across the Indo Pacific could shrink dramatically.
This development suggests that space based surveillance is becoming a decisive layer in modern naval warfare, reducing the effectiveness of traditional concealment tactics.
For China, it marks progress toward persistent, resilient maritime tracking that could reshape regional power dynamics. For the U.S. Navy, it introduces new vulnerabilities that may require rethinking mobility, stealth, and counter space strategies.
@NewRulesGeoโ Follow us on X
China has successfully demonstrated a geosynchronous orbit radar satellite capable of tracking moving maritime targets through storms, clouds, and darkness from 35,800 km above Earth.
๐ธ Locked onto a 340m Japanese tanker near the Spratly Islands, proving persistent surveillance capability.
๐ธ Positioning error was 3 km for the tanker and as low as 1.6 km for four other unidentified vessels, sufficient for anti-ship missile targeting when combined with other data.
๐ธ Unlike low orbit satellites that pass over for minutes, this provides 24/7, all weather coverage. Just three satellites could achieve global reconnaissance of U.S. carrier strike groups.
๐ธ U.S. carrier groups approaching Taiwan or the South China Sea could now be detected and tracked far earlier than previously assumed.
๐ธ Reduces China's dependence on vulnerable low orbit constellations, making its maritime reconnaissance network substantially harder to disrupt during wartime.
๐ธ Pentagon planners face a new reality, concealment at sea may no longer exist. The U.S. Navy has long relied on weather, distance, and satellite gaps to hide movements.
But there are some limits. This satellite has only been tested on a commercial tanker, not on military warships that can maneuver evasively. Space weather or electronic jamming could reduce performance. The full three satellite system is not yet operational.
If China integrates this with over the horizon radars, underwater sensors, drones, and long range anti ship missiles, warning times for U.S. naval commanders across the Indo Pacific could shrink dramatically.
This development suggests that space based surveillance is becoming a decisive layer in modern naval warfare, reducing the effectiveness of traditional concealment tactics.
For China, it marks progress toward persistent, resilient maritime tracking that could reshape regional power dynamics. For the U.S. Navy, it introduces new vulnerabilities that may require rethinking mobility, stealth, and counter space strategies.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
โค66๐23๐11๐ฅ11๐ซก2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐จ๐ท๐บ ZELENSKY IN PANIC: RUSSIA SUPERCHARGES DEADLY 'HEAVY FLAMETHROWER' ARTILLERY
As the West pours billions into a proxy war, Russian state sources confirm major upgrades to the TOS-series thermobaric rocket systems โ the feared โheavy flamethrowersโ now spearheading devastating frontline advances in Ukraine.
๐ธ TOS-2 Tosochka evolves into a wheeled, automated fire-support system โ far beyond a simple assault breacher.
๐ธ 20KM extended range plus rapid shoot-and-scoot mobility lets it strike, vanish, and outpace the heavier tracked TOS-1.
๐ธ One salvo and โthereโs simply NO ENEMY LEFT TO RESISTโ โ thermobaric vacuum blast sucks air from bunkers and ruptures lungs.
๐ธ Lighter, lower-maintenance, air/sea transportable โ the perfect modern-warfare complement while NATO gear gathers dust.
๐ธ TOS-1 gets meter-level navigation accuracy; TOS-3 successor already announced and in testing.
What are your thoughts on how NATO could counter these systems?
@NewRulesGeoโ Follow us on X
As the West pours billions into a proxy war, Russian state sources confirm major upgrades to the TOS-series thermobaric rocket systems โ the feared โheavy flamethrowersโ now spearheading devastating frontline advances in Ukraine.
๐ธ TOS-2 Tosochka evolves into a wheeled, automated fire-support system โ far beyond a simple assault breacher.
๐ธ 20KM extended range plus rapid shoot-and-scoot mobility lets it strike, vanish, and outpace the heavier tracked TOS-1.
๐ธ One salvo and โthereโs simply NO ENEMY LEFT TO RESISTโ โ thermobaric vacuum blast sucks air from bunkers and ruptures lungs.
๐ธ Lighter, lower-maintenance, air/sea transportable โ the perfect modern-warfare complement while NATO gear gathers dust.
๐ธ TOS-1 gets meter-level navigation accuracy; TOS-3 successor already announced and in testing.
What are your thoughts on how NATO could counter these systems?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
โค54๐27๐ฅ19
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐จ๐ท๐บ RUSSIA'S SUBMARINE MODERNIZATION: A CREDIBLE DETERRENT TO NATO IN THE NORTH ATLANTIC
Russia has successfully rebuilt its submarine fleet, fielding advanced vessels that NATO acknowledges are difficult to track. Norwegian Joint Headquarters, operating from a mountain bunker is coordinating allied efforts to monitor Russian movements.
๐ธ Russia has added five Borei A class ballistic missile submarines and four Yasen M class multiple role submarines to its Northern Fleet in the past six years. These vessels carry advanced missiles and operate effectively under Arctic ice.
๐ธ In April 2025, Putin announced a federal funding program of approximately 100 billion dollars over ten years to further modernize the navy. In July 2025, he commissioned a new Borei A class submarine, stating Russia's commitment to "a modern, powerful navy capable of ensuring Russia's security."
๐ธ Additionally, Russia plans to replace all remaining third generation attack submarines with 10 to 12 Yasen class vessels by 2035, each carrying Kalibr, Oniks, and hypersonic Zircon missiles.
๐ธ NATO tracks Russian submarines 24/7, 365 days a year. Western allies are terrified of not knowing where Russian nuclear submarines are if they manage to get out and hide.
๐ธ The UK is only just holding on in the Atlantic in terms of its ability to track Russian submarines with allies. The U.S. Navy also faces severe workforce shortages and delays in its own submarine construction programs.
Russia's expanding modern submarine fleet significantly strengthens its strategic deterrence, particularly in the Arctic and North Atlantic. These capabilities make NATO's tracking efforts more resource-intensive and operationally challenging over large ocean areas.
Submarine detection remains inherently limited, meaning continuous certainty over movements is not achievable for any side. Overall, it sustains a strategic balance where Russia gains stronger deterrent leverage underwater.
@NewRulesGeoโ Follow us on X
Russia has successfully rebuilt its submarine fleet, fielding advanced vessels that NATO acknowledges are difficult to track. Norwegian Joint Headquarters, operating from a mountain bunker is coordinating allied efforts to monitor Russian movements.
๐ธ Russia has added five Borei A class ballistic missile submarines and four Yasen M class multiple role submarines to its Northern Fleet in the past six years. These vessels carry advanced missiles and operate effectively under Arctic ice.
๐ธ In April 2025, Putin announced a federal funding program of approximately 100 billion dollars over ten years to further modernize the navy. In July 2025, he commissioned a new Borei A class submarine, stating Russia's commitment to "a modern, powerful navy capable of ensuring Russia's security."
๐ธ Additionally, Russia plans to replace all remaining third generation attack submarines with 10 to 12 Yasen class vessels by 2035, each carrying Kalibr, Oniks, and hypersonic Zircon missiles.
๐ธ NATO tracks Russian submarines 24/7, 365 days a year. Western allies are terrified of not knowing where Russian nuclear submarines are if they manage to get out and hide.
๐ธ The UK is only just holding on in the Atlantic in terms of its ability to track Russian submarines with allies. The U.S. Navy also faces severe workforce shortages and delays in its own submarine construction programs.
Russia's expanding modern submarine fleet significantly strengthens its strategic deterrence, particularly in the Arctic and North Atlantic. These capabilities make NATO's tracking efforts more resource-intensive and operationally challenging over large ocean areas.
Submarine detection remains inherently limited, meaning continuous certainty over movements is not achievable for any side. Overall, it sustains a strategic balance where Russia gains stronger deterrent leverage underwater.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐ซก46โค36๐13๐ฅ7๐5
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐จ๐ท๐บ NATO'S NIGHTMARE: RUSSIA TESTS AN AI DRONE KILLER TURRET
Russia just tested a new automatic turret using the 7.62mm modernized Kalashnikov machine gun.
Itโs designed to shoot down long-range suicide drones. When combined with Electronic Warfare systems, this technology will soon be added to tanks, BMPs (Russian infantry fighting vehicles), and BTRs (armored personnel carriers).
This means every armored vehicle can protect itself from drones and safely support soldiers on the ground.
๐ธ Smart camera with AI spots tiny First Person View drones against the sky.
๐ธ Cheap, fast-shooting PKM gun + AI aiming computer works like a โmini-Pantsirโ up to 200-300 meters.
๐ธ Tanks will now have their own anti-drone defense for safer firepower support.
๐ธ If installed on many vehicles, big armored attacks could become effective again against swarms of drones.
๐ธ It will work even better with special ammo containing shrapnel or smart exploding rounds.
Is NATOโs cheap drone strategy about to become useless on the battlefield?
@NewRulesGeoโ Follow us on X
Russia just tested a new automatic turret using the 7.62mm modernized Kalashnikov machine gun.
Itโs designed to shoot down long-range suicide drones. When combined with Electronic Warfare systems, this technology will soon be added to tanks, BMPs (Russian infantry fighting vehicles), and BTRs (armored personnel carriers).
This means every armored vehicle can protect itself from drones and safely support soldiers on the ground.
๐ธ Smart camera with AI spots tiny First Person View drones against the sky.
๐ธ Cheap, fast-shooting PKM gun + AI aiming computer works like a โmini-Pantsirโ up to 200-300 meters.
๐ธ Tanks will now have their own anti-drone defense for safer firepower support.
๐ธ If installed on many vehicles, big armored attacks could become effective again against swarms of drones.
๐ธ It will work even better with special ammo containing shrapnel or smart exploding rounds.
Is NATOโs cheap drone strategy about to become useless on the battlefield?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
โค51๐27๐ฅ18๐9๐คฌ1
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐จ๐จ๐ณ Chinaโs Nuclear Math: 50 Reactors at Once. 200GW by 2040
Beijing has confirmed that its nuclear industry is now equipped to handle up to 50 reactor projects concurrently โ a move that speaks directly to China's ambition to emerge as the dominant force in global nuclear power.
By 2040, China expects to have almost twice as much nuclear capacity as it does today, making it the globe's largest nuclear generator by a wide margin, according to the China Nuclear Energy Association (CNEA). Roughly half of every reactor being built on the planet right now is in China, another 16 have been greenlit reported by Goldman Sachs.
Itโs not about carbon goals. Itโs about energy security and the factory floor. The instability around Hormuz makes fossil fuel supply chains look fragile. Nuclear is domestic, steady baseload power that keeps coastal manufacturing hubs humming regardless of what happens to oil tankers.
๐ธRaw Numbers
๐ Right now: 60 operating, 36 being built (thatโs more than half of the entire world's current construction).
๐ 2030 Target: Leapfrog the US to become the โworld's largestโ nuclear producer by scale.
๐ 2040 Target: Hit โ200 Gigawattsโ installed. Thatโs double the current US capacity.
The Hualong One reactor is in "serial construction." Theyโve standardized the design so they can just roll them out faster and cheaper. Each unit generates enough electricity to power 1 million people per year. 2025 investment alone hit โ161 billion yuan (up nearly 10%).โ It's becoming one of the most deployed third-generation reactors in the world.
While the West debates permitting and cost overruns, China is treating reactors like critical infrastructureโthe same way you build a highway or a port. Itโs a concrete-heavy bet that the future of the next economy runs on power made at home, not fuel bought from abroad.
@NewRulesGeoโ Follow us on X
Beijing has confirmed that its nuclear industry is now equipped to handle up to 50 reactor projects concurrently โ a move that speaks directly to China's ambition to emerge as the dominant force in global nuclear power.
By 2040, China expects to have almost twice as much nuclear capacity as it does today, making it the globe's largest nuclear generator by a wide margin, according to the China Nuclear Energy Association (CNEA). Roughly half of every reactor being built on the planet right now is in China, another 16 have been greenlit reported by Goldman Sachs.
Itโs not about carbon goals. Itโs about energy security and the factory floor. The instability around Hormuz makes fossil fuel supply chains look fragile. Nuclear is domestic, steady baseload power that keeps coastal manufacturing hubs humming regardless of what happens to oil tankers.
๐ธRaw Numbers
The Hualong One reactor is in "serial construction." Theyโve standardized the design so they can just roll them out faster and cheaper. Each unit generates enough electricity to power 1 million people per year. 2025 investment alone hit โ161 billion yuan (up nearly 10%).โ It's becoming one of the most deployed third-generation reactors in the world.
While the West debates permitting and cost overruns, China is treating reactors like critical infrastructureโthe same way you build a highway or a port. Itโs a concrete-heavy bet that the future of the next economy runs on power made at home, not fuel bought from abroad.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐38โค29๐19๐6๐ฅ2
๐จ๐ณ๐บ๐ธ U.S. VS. CHINA: THE ROBOTAXI RACE
The artificial intelligence competition between the United States and China has expanded beyond data centers and semiconductor stacks into physical applications.
Autonomous vehicles, robotaxis, and AI powered freight networks represent the next major frontier between the two superpowers.
๐ธ China's robotaxi fleet will grow from 5,000 vehicles in 2025 to 14,000 in 2026, a 180% year over year increase, with projections reaching 3.1 million vehicles by 2035, accounting for 36% of all ride sharing vehicles in China.
๐ธ Several Chinese operators have achieved city level break even on their robotaxi operations. Baidu's Apollo Go in Wuhan now covers 3,000 square kilometers and serves half the city's population. Key industry participants include WeRide, Pony AI, Didi, and Baidu.
๐ธ The United States robotaxi market is projected to reach $19 billion by 2030, up from a prior estimate of $7 billion, and continue growing to $48 billion by 2035. Globally, the robotaxi market is projected to reach $415 billion by 2035.
The AI technologies developed for robotaxis have direct dual use applications. The same sensor fusion, autonomous navigation, and decision-making systems can be transferred to military platforms, including China's sixth generation fighter jets currently in development, unmanned drone swarms, AI powered robot dogs for reconnaissance, and autonomous combat vehicles.
The robotaxi competition between the United States and China is accelerating as both nations scale autonomous mobility technologies. China is advancing rapidly in large scale deployment, while the United States continues to lead in core software and system innovation.
Each ecosystem is expanding into logistics and commercial mobility at different speeds and under different regulatory environments. The outcome will depend on real world deployment scale, safety performance, and global adoption rather than only early initiative.
@NewRulesGeoโ Follow us on X
The artificial intelligence competition between the United States and China has expanded beyond data centers and semiconductor stacks into physical applications.
Autonomous vehicles, robotaxis, and AI powered freight networks represent the next major frontier between the two superpowers.
๐ธ China's robotaxi fleet will grow from 5,000 vehicles in 2025 to 14,000 in 2026, a 180% year over year increase, with projections reaching 3.1 million vehicles by 2035, accounting for 36% of all ride sharing vehicles in China.
๐ธ Several Chinese operators have achieved city level break even on their robotaxi operations. Baidu's Apollo Go in Wuhan now covers 3,000 square kilometers and serves half the city's population. Key industry participants include WeRide, Pony AI, Didi, and Baidu.
๐ธ The United States robotaxi market is projected to reach $19 billion by 2030, up from a prior estimate of $7 billion, and continue growing to $48 billion by 2035. Globally, the robotaxi market is projected to reach $415 billion by 2035.
The AI technologies developed for robotaxis have direct dual use applications. The same sensor fusion, autonomous navigation, and decision-making systems can be transferred to military platforms, including China's sixth generation fighter jets currently in development, unmanned drone swarms, AI powered robot dogs for reconnaissance, and autonomous combat vehicles.
The robotaxi competition between the United States and China is accelerating as both nations scale autonomous mobility technologies. China is advancing rapidly in large scale deployment, while the United States continues to lead in core software and system innovation.
Each ecosystem is expanding into logistics and commercial mobility at different speeds and under different regulatory environments. The outcome will depend on real world deployment scale, safety performance, and global adoption rather than only early initiative.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐33๐11๐ฅ5โค3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐จ๐จ๐ณ CHINA'S ELECTRIC STRIKE DRONE: PENTAGON'S TACTICAL NIGHTMARE
China showed off a electric attack drone called the ZR-300 that can fly with a pilot OR completely unmanned in automatic mode.
๐ธ Weighs just 450 kg, carries up to 200 kg of weapons or gear, flies for 90 minutes and covers 300 km total (120 km combat radius.)
๐ธ Can be armed with a 5.56 mm machine gun firing 600 rounds per minute, plus rockets and a 5 km electronic jamming system.
๐ธ Modular design โ easy to swap weapons for firefighting tools or rescue equipment.
๐ธ Already tested by Chinese security forces in Lianyungang โ perfect for supporting army units in real fights.
๐ธ Electric and cheap to run, it can operate where expensive Western helicopters would struggle.
Do you think Western nations could challenge this cheap Chinese drone system?
@NewRulesGeoโ Follow us on X
China showed off a electric attack drone called the ZR-300 that can fly with a pilot OR completely unmanned in automatic mode.
๐ธ Weighs just 450 kg, carries up to 200 kg of weapons or gear, flies for 90 minutes and covers 300 km total (120 km combat radius.)
๐ธ Can be armed with a 5.56 mm machine gun firing 600 rounds per minute, plus rockets and a 5 km electronic jamming system.
๐ธ Modular design โ easy to swap weapons for firefighting tools or rescue equipment.
๐ธ Already tested by Chinese security forces in Lianyungang โ perfect for supporting army units in real fights.
๐ธ Electric and cheap to run, it can operate where expensive Western helicopters would struggle.
Do you think Western nations could challenge this cheap Chinese drone system?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐42โค21๐ฅ14๐7๐ซก5
๐จ๐ฎ๐ท ๐ข Even if Hormuz reopens, oil crisis will linger. Hereโs why
The international oil market reaches unprecedented supply disruption. The Strait of Hormuz could open tomorrow. It does not matter. The damage is already done.
๐ธ Logistical constraints remain severe even with an immediate ceasefire. Floating storage tankers require 30 to 40 days to offload. VLCCs rerouted to the United States need approximately three months to return. Onshore Middle Eastern storage requires an estimated 200 million barrels to be drained before producers can restart output.
๐ธ Cumulative storage lost from the Hormuz closure is projected to reach 1.2 billion barrels by the end of April, 1.59 billion by the end of May, and 1.98 billion by the end of June. This is approximately four times larger than any previous supply outage in history.
๐ธ The current market cycle is self-reinforcing. Rising crude prices compress refining margins, lowering refined product output. Product storage draws then push margins higher again, leading to increased throughput and further price increases. Global refinery outages have exceeded 5 million barrels per day.
๐ธ By the end of July, United States commercial crude storage could fall below 400 million barrels, approaching the operational minimum of approximately 380 million barrels. Policymakers would then face a binary choice: ban crude exports or watch domestic refineries shut down.
๐ธ The only mechanism capable of balancing the market is demand destruction on the scale of COVID-19 lockdowns. The current global supply shortfall is estimated at 11 to 13 million barrels per day. Price levels near $95 per barrel will not resolve the structural imbalance.
Even if geopolitical tensions ease quickly, the physical constraints of oil logistics mean supply recovery cannot happen instantly. The scale of displaced storage and disrupted refining creates a lagged shock that continues well after any political resolution.
Market stability will depend less on headlines and more on how quickly global infrastructure can rebalance flows and inventories. Ultimately, the situation highlights how energy systems are governed as much by physical bottlenecks as by geopolitics.
@NewRulesGeoโ Follow us on X
The international oil market reaches unprecedented supply disruption. The Strait of Hormuz could open tomorrow. It does not matter. The damage is already done.
๐ธ Logistical constraints remain severe even with an immediate ceasefire. Floating storage tankers require 30 to 40 days to offload. VLCCs rerouted to the United States need approximately three months to return. Onshore Middle Eastern storage requires an estimated 200 million barrels to be drained before producers can restart output.
๐ธ Cumulative storage lost from the Hormuz closure is projected to reach 1.2 billion barrels by the end of April, 1.59 billion by the end of May, and 1.98 billion by the end of June. This is approximately four times larger than any previous supply outage in history.
๐ธ The current market cycle is self-reinforcing. Rising crude prices compress refining margins, lowering refined product output. Product storage draws then push margins higher again, leading to increased throughput and further price increases. Global refinery outages have exceeded 5 million barrels per day.
๐ธ By the end of July, United States commercial crude storage could fall below 400 million barrels, approaching the operational minimum of approximately 380 million barrels. Policymakers would then face a binary choice: ban crude exports or watch domestic refineries shut down.
๐ธ The only mechanism capable of balancing the market is demand destruction on the scale of COVID-19 lockdowns. The current global supply shortfall is estimated at 11 to 13 million barrels per day. Price levels near $95 per barrel will not resolve the structural imbalance.
Even if geopolitical tensions ease quickly, the physical constraints of oil logistics mean supply recovery cannot happen instantly. The scale of displaced storage and disrupted refining creates a lagged shock that continues well after any political resolution.
Market stability will depend less on headlines and more on how quickly global infrastructure can rebalance flows and inventories. Ultimately, the situation highlights how energy systems are governed as much by physical bottlenecks as by geopolitics.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐ฅ39๐26โค14๐5
๐จ๐ฎ๐ท ๐ฐ๐ผ Iran's strikes on Kuwait โ price for hosting America's War
Kuwait has been caught in the middle of other people's conflicts before. In 1990, it was Iraq that invaded โ and the US came in as the "rescuer." Kuwait granted Washington full access to its soil, bases, and airspace. That relationship never ended.
When the US and Israel launched strikes on Iran on February 28, Tehran made one thing clear โ anyone hosting that war effort is part of it.
Kuwait denied that US forces used its bases to attack Iran. But by March 24, Kuwait allowed Washington to use its facilities for missile strikes anyway making it a direct part of the war machine targeting Iran. Kuwait happens to be one of the biggest staging grounds for U.S. forces around 13,000 US troops in the entire Gulf.
๐ธThe part Western media skips:
Iran didn't randomly pick Kuwait. The US military bases in Kuwait are critical launchpads for any air, sea, or land operation against Iran. Tehran was sending a message โ you cannot host a war against us and call yourself neutral.
The US military's presence in Kuwait is fundamentally about securing American strategic access to the region โ host nations provide the bases, and Washington pursues its own agenda from them, Chatham House reported on US military policy in the Middle East.
Kuwait trusted America's security umbrella. That umbrella is now the reason Kuwait is under fire. The lesson is simple โ small nations that rent out their soil for other people's wars don't get to stay out of them.
@NewRulesGeoโ Follow us on X
Kuwait has been caught in the middle of other people's conflicts before. In 1990, it was Iraq that invaded โ and the US came in as the "rescuer." Kuwait granted Washington full access to its soil, bases, and airspace. That relationship never ended.
When the US and Israel launched strikes on Iran on February 28, Tehran made one thing clear โ anyone hosting that war effort is part of it.
Kuwait denied that US forces used its bases to attack Iran. But by March 24, Kuwait allowed Washington to use its facilities for missile strikes anyway making it a direct part of the war machine targeting Iran. Kuwait happens to be one of the biggest staging grounds for U.S. forces around 13,000 US troops in the entire Gulf.
๐ธThe part Western media skips:
Iran didn't randomly pick Kuwait. The US military bases in Kuwait are critical launchpads for any air, sea, or land operation against Iran. Tehran was sending a message โ you cannot host a war against us and call yourself neutral.
The US military's presence in Kuwait is fundamentally about securing American strategic access to the region โ host nations provide the bases, and Washington pursues its own agenda from them, Chatham House reported on US military policy in the Middle East.
Kuwait trusted America's security umbrella. That umbrella is now the reason Kuwait is under fire. The lesson is simple โ small nations that rent out their soil for other people's wars don't get to stay out of them.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐90โค29๐ฅ21๐15๐6
๐จ๐จ๐ณ Drone Trap: China's Pacific Strategy to Deter Adversaries
China is developing a strategy to use autonomous minelaying drones to blockade strategic waters across the First Island Chain, from Japan's Ryukyu archipelago to the Philippines, in a conflict over Taiwan.
๐ธ The AJX002 extra-large unmanned underwater vehicle, 18 to 20 meters long with a 1,000 nautical mile range, can reach every major chokepoint and return without refueling. Pump-jet propulsion and acoustic stealth coating allow covert mining. Each drone carries up to 20 mines, and multiple drones form a coordinated network via satellite links.
๐ธ The PLA would target key maritime corridors along the First Island Chain, not around Taiwan itself. The objective is to trap adversary vessels within their harbors or prevent them from entering blockade zones, severing supply lines of weapons, fuel, and food from the United States and Japan.
๐ธ Taiwan depends on maritime trade for 80% to 90% of its imported fuel and grain. Under a full-scale war scenario with U.S. intervention, Taiwan's GDP would contract by 40% in the first year. Even under a blockade alone, GDP would decline by 12.5%.
๐ธ Mines can be covertly deployed by almost any vessel, including commercial ships or fishing boats. Cleared areas can be easily reseeded, making clearance efforts temporary.
๐ธ However, mining international waters carries significant risks. It could disrupt global trade, including routes critical to China's own economy, and could lead to large-scale sanctions. An unintended sinking of a neutral vessel could expand the conflict.
This strategy would strengthen China's ability to deny access across the First Island Chain using autonomous minelaying drones. It could trap or delay U.S. and allied naval forces, making intervention around Taiwan far more difficult.
Once China lays these mines, the enemy cannot clear them fast enough, and even if they do, China can easily reseed the waters, giving Beijing lasting control long after any ceasefire is signed.
@NewRulesGeoโ Follow us on X
China is developing a strategy to use autonomous minelaying drones to blockade strategic waters across the First Island Chain, from Japan's Ryukyu archipelago to the Philippines, in a conflict over Taiwan.
๐ธ The AJX002 extra-large unmanned underwater vehicle, 18 to 20 meters long with a 1,000 nautical mile range, can reach every major chokepoint and return without refueling. Pump-jet propulsion and acoustic stealth coating allow covert mining. Each drone carries up to 20 mines, and multiple drones form a coordinated network via satellite links.
๐ธ The PLA would target key maritime corridors along the First Island Chain, not around Taiwan itself. The objective is to trap adversary vessels within their harbors or prevent them from entering blockade zones, severing supply lines of weapons, fuel, and food from the United States and Japan.
๐ธ Taiwan depends on maritime trade for 80% to 90% of its imported fuel and grain. Under a full-scale war scenario with U.S. intervention, Taiwan's GDP would contract by 40% in the first year. Even under a blockade alone, GDP would decline by 12.5%.
๐ธ Mines can be covertly deployed by almost any vessel, including commercial ships or fishing boats. Cleared areas can be easily reseeded, making clearance efforts temporary.
๐ธ However, mining international waters carries significant risks. It could disrupt global trade, including routes critical to China's own economy, and could lead to large-scale sanctions. An unintended sinking of a neutral vessel could expand the conflict.
This strategy would strengthen China's ability to deny access across the First Island Chain using autonomous minelaying drones. It could trap or delay U.S. and allied naval forces, making intervention around Taiwan far more difficult.
Once China lays these mines, the enemy cannot clear them fast enough, and even if they do, China can easily reseed the waters, giving Beijing lasting control long after any ceasefire is signed.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
โค40๐19๐7๐1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐จ๐ท๐บ NATOโS WORST NIGHTMARE: RUSSIAN ISKANDER-K PUTS EUROPEโS CORE STRATEGIC TARGETS IN RANGE
While Iskander-M grabs Ukraine headlines, Russiaโs stealthier Iskander-K low-altitude cruise system, poses a deadlier deep-strike threat to NATO rear facilities in any full-scale European war.
๐ธ 1,500โ2,000 km range puts most European NATO targets in reach from Russian soil alone.
๐ธ 9M729 Kalibr-derived missiles hug terrain at low altitude, evading early-warning radars far better than ballistic systems.
๐ธ Highly mobile TEL launchers enable dispersed, cost-effective saturation strikes plus rapid air redeployment.
๐ธ 5โ10 m CEP precision + nuclear capability exploits gaps in air defenses when paired with Iskander-M and new Oreshnik IRBM.
๐ธ NATO stockpiles sit critically depleted after massive Ukraine donations and U.S. munitions drain against Iran.
With stockpiles drained fighting Iran and arming Ukraine, can NATO even survive an Iskander-K saturation attack?
@NewRulesGeoโ Follow us on X
While Iskander-M grabs Ukraine headlines, Russiaโs stealthier Iskander-K low-altitude cruise system, poses a deadlier deep-strike threat to NATO rear facilities in any full-scale European war.
๐ธ 1,500โ2,000 km range puts most European NATO targets in reach from Russian soil alone.
๐ธ 9M729 Kalibr-derived missiles hug terrain at low altitude, evading early-warning radars far better than ballistic systems.
๐ธ Highly mobile TEL launchers enable dispersed, cost-effective saturation strikes plus rapid air redeployment.
๐ธ 5โ10 m CEP precision + nuclear capability exploits gaps in air defenses when paired with Iskander-M and new Oreshnik IRBM.
๐ธ NATO stockpiles sit critically depleted after massive Ukraine donations and U.S. munitions drain against Iran.
With stockpiles drained fighting Iran and arming Ukraine, can NATO even survive an Iskander-K saturation attack?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
โค51๐ฅ38๐15๐4๐ซก2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
๐จ๐ท๐บ RUSSIA UNVEILS NEW ANTI-DRONE RADAR THAT RENDERS NATO DRONES OUTDATED
At a major security meeting, Rosoboronexport showed off two brand-new systems designed to spot, track, and destroy small enemy drones before they can hit important targets.
๐ธ The RADESCAN-ANTIDRON radar can detect tiny drones (with just 0.01 mยฒ radar signature) from 1.5 km away using very low power โ making it hard for enemies to even notice itโs there.
๐ธ The mobile YOLKA system mounts on a pickup truck with radar panels, infrared cameras, and two interceptor drones that can take down targets up to 3 km away and as high as 2 km.
๐ธ It works in any weather, uses semi-automatic mode so an operator stays in control, and is perfect against swarms of low-flying drones.
๐ธ The whole thing is already built and in field tests โ next step is mass production
Is NATOโs drone strategy about to become completely useless?
@NewRulesGeoโ Follow us on X
At a major security meeting, Rosoboronexport showed off two brand-new systems designed to spot, track, and destroy small enemy drones before they can hit important targets.
๐ธ The RADESCAN-ANTIDRON radar can detect tiny drones (with just 0.01 mยฒ radar signature) from 1.5 km away using very low power โ making it hard for enemies to even notice itโs there.
๐ธ The mobile YOLKA system mounts on a pickup truck with radar panels, infrared cameras, and two interceptor drones that can take down targets up to 3 km away and as high as 2 km.
๐ธ It works in any weather, uses semi-automatic mode so an operator stays in control, and is perfect against swarms of low-flying drones.
๐ธ The whole thing is already built and in field tests โ next step is mass production
Is NATOโs drone strategy about to become completely useless?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
โค53๐28๐ฅ16๐3
๐จ๐จ๐ณ โด Tanker Boom: How China's Shipyards Profit from Hormuz Crisis
China already dominates global shipbuilding orders and now China's shipyards are emerging as clear beneficiaries of the US-Israeli war on Iran, securing new orders as crude transport bottlenecks worsen and global demand for very large crude carriers (VLCCs) rises.
๐ธ The Strait of Hormuz handles about a quarter of the world's seaborne oil. With the strait largely blocked for eight weeks, tankers are forced to take longer routes, exacerbating already tight fleets caused by ageing vessels.
๐ธ Shipping companies are racing to expand capacity, particularly in VLCCs capable of transporting about 2 million barrels of oil per voyage. Benchmark VLCC freight rates on routes like the Persian Gulf-China corridor surged nearly 74% in mid-January 2026 compared to early January levels.
๐ธ China's shipyards benefit from strong capacity, lower costs, and shorter delivery times. At least two Swiss firms and one Singapore-based company have placed VLCC orders with Chinese shipyards in recent weeks.
๐ธ Switzerland's Advantage Tankers, a long-time South Korea customer, placed an order with Dalian Shipbuilding for two 307,000-deadweight-tonne VLCCs, scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2028 and the third quarter of 2029.
๐ธ Geneva-based Mercuria Energy Group signed shipbuilding contracts with Chinese Dalian Shipbuilding worth approximately $642 million, including up to four VLCCs at about $123 million each and two LR2 product tankers at about $75 million each, with deliveries expected by 2029.
China now holds 63% of global orders and 62% of the order backlog as of 2025. In November 2025 alone, China secured 50% of monthly orders (2.58 million CGT).
The Hormuz disruption has tightened global tanker supply, pushed freight rates and triggered a wave of VLCC orders. A regional energy shock is translating into a structural industrial gain for China's maritime sector.
@NewRulesGeoโ Follow us on X
China already dominates global shipbuilding orders and now China's shipyards are emerging as clear beneficiaries of the US-Israeli war on Iran, securing new orders as crude transport bottlenecks worsen and global demand for very large crude carriers (VLCCs) rises.
๐ธ The Strait of Hormuz handles about a quarter of the world's seaborne oil. With the strait largely blocked for eight weeks, tankers are forced to take longer routes, exacerbating already tight fleets caused by ageing vessels.
๐ธ Shipping companies are racing to expand capacity, particularly in VLCCs capable of transporting about 2 million barrels of oil per voyage. Benchmark VLCC freight rates on routes like the Persian Gulf-China corridor surged nearly 74% in mid-January 2026 compared to early January levels.
๐ธ China's shipyards benefit from strong capacity, lower costs, and shorter delivery times. At least two Swiss firms and one Singapore-based company have placed VLCC orders with Chinese shipyards in recent weeks.
๐ธ Switzerland's Advantage Tankers, a long-time South Korea customer, placed an order with Dalian Shipbuilding for two 307,000-deadweight-tonne VLCCs, scheduled for delivery in the second quarter of 2028 and the third quarter of 2029.
๐ธ Geneva-based Mercuria Energy Group signed shipbuilding contracts with Chinese Dalian Shipbuilding worth approximately $642 million, including up to four VLCCs at about $123 million each and two LR2 product tankers at about $75 million each, with deliveries expected by 2029.
China now holds 63% of global orders and 62% of the order backlog as of 2025. In November 2025 alone, China secured 50% of monthly orders (2.58 million CGT).
The Hormuz disruption has tightened global tanker supply, pushed freight rates and triggered a wave of VLCC orders. A regional energy shock is translating into a structural industrial gain for China's maritime sector.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
โค43๐26๐ฅ10๐3