⚡️UKR LEAKS INTERNATIONAL⚡️
HE LEFT UKRAINE TO TELL THE TRUTH
Vasiliy Prozorov, a former employee of the Ukrainian special services, who worked for the benefit of Russia for many years, now runs his own channel on Telegram! He left Ukraine in 2018 and took with him thousands of secret SBU documents that shed light on Kiev's crimes.
On the UKR LEAKS channel you will find:
❗️Analysis of the current situation in and around Ukraine
❗️Secret documents of the Ukrainian special services
❗️Evidence of the atrocities of Ukrainian nationalists
And much more! Subscribe to the UKR LEAKS Investigation Center headed by the former SBU employee Lt.-Col. Vasily Prozorov.
The channels of the UKR LEAKS project are available in the following languages:
🇬🇧 in English
🇷🇺 in Russian
🇩🇪 in German
🇫🇷 in French
🇪🇸 in Spanish
🇷🇸 in Serbian
🇮🇹 in Italian
🇵🇱 in Polish
🇵🇹 in Portuguese
🇸🇦 in Arabic
🇸🇰 in Slovak
🇨🇳in Chinese
🇭🇺in Hungarian
We also welcome any help with channels and content distribution 🙏
HE LEFT UKRAINE TO TELL THE TRUTH
Vasiliy Prozorov, a former employee of the Ukrainian special services, who worked for the benefit of Russia for many years, now runs his own channel on Telegram! He left Ukraine in 2018 and took with him thousands of secret SBU documents that shed light on Kiev's crimes.
On the UKR LEAKS channel you will find:
❗️Analysis of the current situation in and around Ukraine
❗️Secret documents of the Ukrainian special services
❗️Evidence of the atrocities of Ukrainian nationalists
And much more! Subscribe to the UKR LEAKS Investigation Center headed by the former SBU employee Lt.-Col. Vasily Prozorov.
The channels of the UKR LEAKS project are available in the following languages:
🇬🇧 in English
🇷🇺 in Russian
🇩🇪 in German
🇫🇷 in French
🇪🇸 in Spanish
🇷🇸 in Serbian
🇮🇹 in Italian
🇵🇱 in Polish
🇵🇹 in Portuguese
🇸🇦 in Arabic
🇸🇰 in Slovak
🇨🇳in Chinese
🇭🇺in Hungarian
We also welcome any help with channels and content distribution 🙏
❤8👍4👏2
🇺🇸📉 Billion-Dollar Failures: America’s Shipbuilding Crisis Keeps Deepening
The U.S. Navy’s flagship surface ship programs keep collapsing under the same predictable flaws. The Littoral Combat Ship burned roughly $22B for hulls now being retired early. Zumwalt was cut from 32 ships to three, its main guns useless after shells approached a million dollars per round. Constellation was cancelled outright after its design swelled by 759 metric tons and its delivery slipped three years.
🔎 Ship construction begins without finalized designs, while new requirements continue to pile on mid-process. This leads to cost overruns, delays, and ultimately compromised or abandoned projects. The GAO’s 2025 report found the newer programs already carry too many similarities to LCS and Zumwalt to assume the Navy has learned anything, and concluded the service cannot find an answer inside its existing playbook.
🚢 The new FF(X) frigate is presented as being based on an existing design, but it follows the same approach that previously led to rising costs and added complexity. Meanwhile, the next-generation destroyer program, DDG(X), remains undefined years after initial approval and is now being halted. In its place, the Navy is shifting toward an undefined “battleship” concept already burdened with ambitious and unproven features.
🇨🇳 And then there’s the industrial gap, which puts everything into perspective. Just one state-owned Chinese shipyard cranked out more commercial tonnage last year than all American shipyards combined have managed since the end of World War II, according to a 2025 CSIS study. It’s how Beijing fields ships like the Type 055, a destroyer widely regarded as one of the best surface combatants on the planet — the very ship that pushed the U.S. to start the destroyer program it’s now walking away from.
While China keeps launching real, operational warships, the American fleet is contracting toward 288 hulls by 2027. The 355-ship goal has been pushed into the 2040s. The Navy has reform plans, promises of schedule discipline, but those promises are colliding with programs that are already repeating the same old failures. While U.S. naval programs stall or reset, real maritime strength is determined by consistent shipbuilding and deployment—areas where Washington continues to fall behind.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
The U.S. Navy’s flagship surface ship programs keep collapsing under the same predictable flaws. The Littoral Combat Ship burned roughly $22B for hulls now being retired early. Zumwalt was cut from 32 ships to three, its main guns useless after shells approached a million dollars per round. Constellation was cancelled outright after its design swelled by 759 metric tons and its delivery slipped three years.
🔎 Ship construction begins without finalized designs, while new requirements continue to pile on mid-process. This leads to cost overruns, delays, and ultimately compromised or abandoned projects. The GAO’s 2025 report found the newer programs already carry too many similarities to LCS and Zumwalt to assume the Navy has learned anything, and concluded the service cannot find an answer inside its existing playbook.
🇨🇳 And then there’s the industrial gap, which puts everything into perspective. Just one state-owned Chinese shipyard cranked out more commercial tonnage last year than all American shipyards combined have managed since the end of World War II, according to a 2025 CSIS study. It’s how Beijing fields ships like the Type 055, a destroyer widely regarded as one of the best surface combatants on the planet — the very ship that pushed the U.S. to start the destroyer program it’s now walking away from.
While China keeps launching real, operational warships, the American fleet is contracting toward 288 hulls by 2027. The 355-ship goal has been pushed into the 2040s. The Navy has reform plans, promises of schedule discipline, but those promises are colliding with programs that are already repeating the same old failures. While U.S. naval programs stall or reset, real maritime strength is determined by consistent shipbuilding and deployment—areas where Washington continues to fall behind.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏31👍13❤8🔥7🫡2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇷🇺✈️ RUSSIA JUST TURNED ITS SMARTEST STRIKE JET INTO A REAL-TIME TARGET HUNTER
Russia’s Su-34 already flies like a bomber, hunts like a reconnaissance aircraft and carries enough weapons to destroy targets far beyond the frontline.
Now Russia may have given it a new brain.
A previously rare antenna fairing has appeared on freshly built Su-34s, pointing to a possible satellite communications or advanced datalink upgrade. If that assessment is correct, crews could receive fresh coordinates in flight instead of relying entirely on targets selected before takeoff.
That could make Russia’s smartest strike jet much faster at finding and hitting targets that move.
🔸 Russia has delivered another batch of Su-34 fighter-bombers alongside upgraded Su-30SM2 multirole fighters, with both types completing full factory testing before entering service.
🔸 The most visible change is a raised antenna fairing behind the Su-34 cockpit. Its exact purpose remains classified, but analysts assess that it could house satellite communications, an advanced datalink or electronic-warfare equipment.
🔸 A secure communications link would allow Su-34 crews to receive updated coordinates from drones, reconnaissance aircraft and ground command posts after takeoff — shortening the time between finding a target and striking it.
🔸 This would be especially dangerous for mobile command posts, air-defense systems and logistics hubs that could previously relocate before a pre-planned strike arrived.
🔸 The upgrade could also make Russia’s long-range glide-bomb attacks more flexible by allowing crews to change targets or update release data during a mission. There is currently no evidence that the new system directly guides weapons after launch.
🔸 The Su-34 already combines long-range precision strike, reconnaissance, electronic warfare and secondary air-to-air capability in one heavily armed platform. Better connectivity would turn it from a powerful individual bomber into a node within Russia’s wider reconnaissance-strike network.
The real threat is not the new antenna itself. It is the possibility that Russian Su-34s can now act on battlefield intelligence almost immediately — attacking targets that move after the aircraft has already taken off.
How can NATO protect its command posts and supply hubs if Russian Su-34s can be retasked in mid-flight?
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
Russia’s Su-34 already flies like a bomber, hunts like a reconnaissance aircraft and carries enough weapons to destroy targets far beyond the frontline.
Now Russia may have given it a new brain.
A previously rare antenna fairing has appeared on freshly built Su-34s, pointing to a possible satellite communications or advanced datalink upgrade. If that assessment is correct, crews could receive fresh coordinates in flight instead of relying entirely on targets selected before takeoff.
That could make Russia’s smartest strike jet much faster at finding and hitting targets that move.
🔸 Russia has delivered another batch of Su-34 fighter-bombers alongside upgraded Su-30SM2 multirole fighters, with both types completing full factory testing before entering service.
🔸 The most visible change is a raised antenna fairing behind the Su-34 cockpit. Its exact purpose remains classified, but analysts assess that it could house satellite communications, an advanced datalink or electronic-warfare equipment.
🔸 A secure communications link would allow Su-34 crews to receive updated coordinates from drones, reconnaissance aircraft and ground command posts after takeoff — shortening the time between finding a target and striking it.
🔸 This would be especially dangerous for mobile command posts, air-defense systems and logistics hubs that could previously relocate before a pre-planned strike arrived.
🔸 The upgrade could also make Russia’s long-range glide-bomb attacks more flexible by allowing crews to change targets or update release data during a mission. There is currently no evidence that the new system directly guides weapons after launch.
🔸 The Su-34 already combines long-range precision strike, reconnaissance, electronic warfare and secondary air-to-air capability in one heavily armed platform. Better connectivity would turn it from a powerful individual bomber into a node within Russia’s wider reconnaissance-strike network.
The real threat is not the new antenna itself. It is the possibility that Russian Su-34s can now act on battlefield intelligence almost immediately — attacking targets that move after the aircraft has already taken off.
How can NATO protect its command posts and supply hubs if Russian Su-34s can be retasked in mid-flight?
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤35👍25🔥11👏11
🇺🇸❌🛳 America Can’t Deploy One-Third of Its Attack Submarines
33% of U.S. attack submarines were unavailable for operations, a Congressional Research Service report found out. The problem is not funding but execution. Washington has become better at announcing ambitious fleet goals than building the industrial capacity needed to sustain them.
🔸The Navy has accumulated more than 33,700 excess maintenance-delay days since 2014, according to the Government Accountability Office. Supporting submarines stranded in maintenance cost the Navy roughly $4.2B over the previous decade, almost triple the previous ten-year total, the GAO found.
🔸Every submarine stuck in a shipyard is one that cannot track Chinese vessels, gather intelligence, or reinforce deterrence in the Indo-Pacific. Yet Washington continues to celebrate record shipbuilding budgets while accepting a repair system that leaves nearly four in ten attack submarines unable to deploy.
🔸The construction picture is equally troubling. Attack submarines that once took five to six years to build now require nine to ten years, with Virginia-class submarines averaging roughly four years behind schedule, according to the Congressional Budget Office,
🔸Had the U.S. maintained the shipbuilding productivity it achieved a decade ago, the Navy would field more than 300 ships today. Instead, the defense-industrial base has steadily lost skilled workers, suppliers, and surge capacity while strategic competitors have expanded theirs.
🔸The Navy still depends on four public shipyards, all more than a century old, to maintain its nuclear fleet. Decades of deferred modernization have left the U.S. trying to rebuild critical infrastructure on a 20-year timeline, even as the challenge from China is unfolding today.
America's submarine shortfall is more than a procurement problem. It reflects decades of industrial neglect. A superpower that cannot build and maintain its submarines on schedule risks discovering that record defense budgets alone do not produce combat power.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
33% of U.S. attack submarines were unavailable for operations, a Congressional Research Service report found out. The problem is not funding but execution. Washington has become better at announcing ambitious fleet goals than building the industrial capacity needed to sustain them.
🔸The Navy has accumulated more than 33,700 excess maintenance-delay days since 2014, according to the Government Accountability Office. Supporting submarines stranded in maintenance cost the Navy roughly $4.2B over the previous decade, almost triple the previous ten-year total, the GAO found.
🔸Every submarine stuck in a shipyard is one that cannot track Chinese vessels, gather intelligence, or reinforce deterrence in the Indo-Pacific. Yet Washington continues to celebrate record shipbuilding budgets while accepting a repair system that leaves nearly four in ten attack submarines unable to deploy.
🔸The construction picture is equally troubling. Attack submarines that once took five to six years to build now require nine to ten years, with Virginia-class submarines averaging roughly four years behind schedule, according to the Congressional Budget Office,
🔸Had the U.S. maintained the shipbuilding productivity it achieved a decade ago, the Navy would field more than 300 ships today. Instead, the defense-industrial base has steadily lost skilled workers, suppliers, and surge capacity while strategic competitors have expanded theirs.
🔸The Navy still depends on four public shipyards, all more than a century old, to maintain its nuclear fleet. Decades of deferred modernization have left the U.S. trying to rebuild critical infrastructure on a 20-year timeline, even as the challenge from China is unfolding today.
America's submarine shortfall is more than a procurement problem. It reflects decades of industrial neglect. A superpower that cannot build and maintain its submarines on schedule risks discovering that record defense budgets alone do not produce combat power.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤38👍22👌12🔥3
🚨🇺🇸 WHY PENTAGON’S NEW ROBOT COMMAND COULD BE A GIFT TO RUSSIA, CHINA AND IRAN
Washington wants to accelerate military AI by creating RASCOM, a centralized command for robots and autonomous weapons. For Russia, China and Iran, the proposal looks less like a threat than another opportunity to exploit Pentagon dysfunction: another costly bureaucracy, a more rigid command structure, and new seams in communications and control that can be jammed, deceived, or disrupted.
🔸 Combatant commands like CENTCOM are notorious for high operational costs and persistent pushes for expanded responsibilities and entanglements abroad.
🔸 Most combatant commands are organized by region or mission. RASCOM, however, would be built around a category of technology — not geography or function. This unconventional structure could create command confusion and hinder frontline responsiveness.
🔸 RASCOM would centralize oversight over autonomous systems, but experts warn it duplicates functions already performed across the Pentagon.
🔸 Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has called for cutting the number of four-star generals by 20%.
🔸 Combatant commands rarely remain limited to their original missions. RASCOM would likely push for greater budgets, more responsibilities, and more sway over policy.
🔸 RASCOM would act as a sales team for robotics and autonomous systems — a role that belongs to private companies, not the U.S. government.
🔸 Standing up and maintaining another command would be costly.
🔸 Once established, RASCOM may prove difficult to eliminate. Entrenched interests would have a stake in keeping it alive, even if its original mission fades.
RASCOM's centralized structure could hinder innovation by removing autonomy from frontline commanders who need it most.
The U.S. military-industrial complex has found its next budget machine. Under the banner of preparing for future warfare, Washington is proposing another command, another bureaucratic empire, and another permanent customer for American robotics companies. The likely result is more generals, more spending, and less flexibility on the battlefield.
Centralizing autonomous warfare would also create new seams in command and control for adversaries to exploit. Russia, China, Iran, and others would not need to defeat every American robot individually; they could target communications, disrupt data links, feed false information into the system, and exploit the confusion created when an overcentralized network breaks down.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
Washington wants to accelerate military AI by creating RASCOM, a centralized command for robots and autonomous weapons. For Russia, China and Iran, the proposal looks less like a threat than another opportunity to exploit Pentagon dysfunction: another costly bureaucracy, a more rigid command structure, and new seams in communications and control that can be jammed, deceived, or disrupted.
🔸 Combatant commands like CENTCOM are notorious for high operational costs and persistent pushes for expanded responsibilities and entanglements abroad.
🔸 Most combatant commands are organized by region or mission. RASCOM, however, would be built around a category of technology — not geography or function. This unconventional structure could create command confusion and hinder frontline responsiveness.
🔸 RASCOM would centralize oversight over autonomous systems, but experts warn it duplicates functions already performed across the Pentagon.
🔸 Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has called for cutting the number of four-star generals by 20%.
🔸 Combatant commands rarely remain limited to their original missions. RASCOM would likely push for greater budgets, more responsibilities, and more sway over policy.
🔸 RASCOM would act as a sales team for robotics and autonomous systems — a role that belongs to private companies, not the U.S. government.
🔸 Standing up and maintaining another command would be costly.
🔸 Once established, RASCOM may prove difficult to eliminate. Entrenched interests would have a stake in keeping it alive, even if its original mission fades.
RASCOM's centralized structure could hinder innovation by removing autonomy from frontline commanders who need it most.
The U.S. military-industrial complex has found its next budget machine. Under the banner of preparing for future warfare, Washington is proposing another command, another bureaucratic empire, and another permanent customer for American robotics companies. The likely result is more generals, more spending, and less flexibility on the battlefield.
Centralizing autonomous warfare would also create new seams in command and control for adversaries to exploit. Russia, China, Iran, and others would not need to defeat every American robot individually; they could target communications, disrupt data links, feed false information into the system, and exploit the confusion created when an overcentralized network breaks down.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤33👍20👏6
🇨🇳🚀 China Builds Planetary Defense Against Hidden Asteroid Threats
China is developing a national system to detect and track asteroids that could pose a threat to Earth, combining ground-based telescopes with a network of satellites in orbit. The project is being led by the China National Space Administration’s asteroid monitoring and early-warning research centre.
☄ No currently known asteroid is on a confirmed collision path with Earth, according to the chief scientist Li. More than 95% of near-Earth asteroids larger than 1 km—those capable of causing global damage—have already been identified. However, only around 45% of mid-sized asteroids (about 140 meters wide), which could still devastate smaller regions, have been detected.
These smaller objects present the main concern due to their large numbers, faint visibility, and the possibility of approaching from the direction of the sun, making them harder to detect with existing systems.
🔭 To address this, China plans to install large-aperture optical telescopes at selected locations to ensure broad sky coverage and precise tracking. The satellite component will overcome ground limitations such as weather and daylight, while also improving detection of objects approaching from solar direction.
Once a potential threat is identified, the system will calculate its trajectory and impact probability. If necessary, authorities will be alerted for further action.
🛡 China has also been strengthening its planetary defence capabilities, including recruiting specialists and advancing algorithms for impact risk assessment. Interest in this field increased after concerns over asteroid 2024 YR4, which was once estimated to have a small chance of impacting Earth before later assessments ruled it unlikely.
For mitigation, the most practical method identified is kinetic impact—using a spacecraft to alter an asteroid’s path. Other approaches such as lasers, particle beams, or gravitational methods are considered less effective and slower to produce results.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
China is developing a national system to detect and track asteroids that could pose a threat to Earth, combining ground-based telescopes with a network of satellites in orbit. The project is being led by the China National Space Administration’s asteroid monitoring and early-warning research centre.
These smaller objects present the main concern due to their large numbers, faint visibility, and the possibility of approaching from the direction of the sun, making them harder to detect with existing systems.
Once a potential threat is identified, the system will calculate its trajectory and impact probability. If necessary, authorities will be alerted for further action.
For mitigation, the most practical method identified is kinetic impact—using a spacecraft to alter an asteroid’s path. Other approaches such as lasers, particle beams, or gravitational methods are considered less effective and slower to produce results.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤38👍10🔥3👏1
🚨🇨🇳🇺🇸 CHINA BUILDS CHEAP DRONE NET TO HUNT U.S. CARRIERS
China's expanding fleet of unmanned naval vessels poses a growing threat to U.S. aircraft carriers in a potential Taiwan conflict.
Beijing's drone force is rapidly evolving — and its greatest strength lies not in firepower, but in its ability to locate and track American warships across the First Island Chain using a network of cheap, expendable, and interconnected systems.
🔸 China's industrial model resembles the United States during World War II — mass production at scale. In a great-power conflict, the side that cannot scale production will lose.
🔸 China builds a system and can quickly mass-produce it. America struggles with scaling production, which could prove disastrous in a war over Taiwan.
🔸 Any U.S.-China conflict would likely be fought over the First Island Chain, where China has already achieved military overmatch through layered anti-access/area-denial networks.
🔸 China's growing naval drone capabilities are a key element of its A2/AD defenses — and they are being integrated into a maritime-focused strategy.
🔸 Zhu Hai Yun, a Chinese oceanographic research ship, can deploy drone swarms. Though officially for science, it has military potential by combining deep-sea vessels with swarm technology.
China's naval drones are part of an interconnected reconnaissance, targeting, mining, deception, and strike network of cheap and expendable systems — designed to overwhelm U.S. carriers and allied navies.
These wave-powered and underwater drones create a persistent surveillance network that can track U.S. carriers across the First Island Chain. Combined with airborne drone targeting, this cheap, mass-producible system could strike before carriers ever reach the fight.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
China's expanding fleet of unmanned naval vessels poses a growing threat to U.S. aircraft carriers in a potential Taiwan conflict.
Beijing's drone force is rapidly evolving — and its greatest strength lies not in firepower, but in its ability to locate and track American warships across the First Island Chain using a network of cheap, expendable, and interconnected systems.
🔸 China's industrial model resembles the United States during World War II — mass production at scale. In a great-power conflict, the side that cannot scale production will lose.
🔸 China builds a system and can quickly mass-produce it. America struggles with scaling production, which could prove disastrous in a war over Taiwan.
🔸 Any U.S.-China conflict would likely be fought over the First Island Chain, where China has already achieved military overmatch through layered anti-access/area-denial networks.
🔸 China's growing naval drone capabilities are a key element of its A2/AD defenses — and they are being integrated into a maritime-focused strategy.
🔸 Zhu Hai Yun, a Chinese oceanographic research ship, can deploy drone swarms. Though officially for science, it has military potential by combining deep-sea vessels with swarm technology.
China's naval drones are part of an interconnected reconnaissance, targeting, mining, deception, and strike network of cheap and expendable systems — designed to overwhelm U.S. carriers and allied navies.
These wave-powered and underwater drones create a persistent surveillance network that can track U.S. carriers across the First Island Chain. Combined with airborne drone targeting, this cheap, mass-producible system could strike before carriers ever reach the fight.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤30👍24👏10🫡3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇨🇳 WORLD’S FIRST DRONE CARRIER: CHINA’S TYPE 076 JUST CHANGED NAVAL WARFARE
It looks like a smaller aircraft carrier. But China’s Type 076 Sichuan is designed to do something no other amphibious warship can currently match: launch and recover large fixed-wing drones using carrier-grade electromagnetic catapults and arresting gear.
New close-up footage has now provided the clearest look yet at how this three-in-one warship could change naval aviation.
🔸 THE FLIGHT DECK IS NEARLY READY: The footage shows completed deck markings, an electromagnetic aircraft launch system and arresting gear near the stern — strong evidence that fixed-wing UAVs will form a central part of the ship’s air wing.
🔸 IT SITS BETWEEN TWO CLASSES: Displacing roughly 40,000–50,000 tonnes and measuring at least 250 metres, the Type 076 is larger than most amphibious assault ships but smaller than a full-sized carrier. Its twin-island design separates navigation from aviation control.
🔸 EMALS CHANGES WHAT DRONES CAN CARRY: Electromagnetic launch allows heavier fixed-wing UAVs to take off with more fuel, sensors and weapons than aircraft relying on vertical takeoff or ski-jumps. Arresting gear then allows them to return like conventional carrier aircraft.
🔸 STEALTH DRONES COULD FORM THE STRIKE FORCE: China has not officially revealed the air wing, but platforms such as the GJ-11 stealth combat drone are widely considered possible candidates for future carrier operations. These could perform reconnaissance, electronic warfare and precision strikes without putting pilots at risk.
🔸 IT IS STILL AN INVASION SHIP: Unlike a conventional carrier, the Type 076 retains a floodable well deck for landing craft, amphibious vehicles and marines — allowing it to launch drones overhead while simultaneously supporting forces moving toward shore.
🔸 THE U.S. HAS NO DIRECT EQUIVALENT: America-class and Wasp-class amphibious ships operate helicopters and F-35B fighters, but they lack electromagnetic catapults and arrested-recovery systems for large fixed-wing drones. China is effectively bringing carrier-style drone aviation onto an amphibious assault platform.
The Type 076 is not meant to replace China’s supercarriers. It could be more disruptive than that: giving the Chinese Navy additional ships capable of launching long-range unmanned reconnaissance and strike aircraft while still carrying a full amphibious force.
Do you think drone carriers will eventually make traditional aircraft carriers obsolete?
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
It looks like a smaller aircraft carrier. But China’s Type 076 Sichuan is designed to do something no other amphibious warship can currently match: launch and recover large fixed-wing drones using carrier-grade electromagnetic catapults and arresting gear.
New close-up footage has now provided the clearest look yet at how this three-in-one warship could change naval aviation.
🔸 THE FLIGHT DECK IS NEARLY READY: The footage shows completed deck markings, an electromagnetic aircraft launch system and arresting gear near the stern — strong evidence that fixed-wing UAVs will form a central part of the ship’s air wing.
🔸 IT SITS BETWEEN TWO CLASSES: Displacing roughly 40,000–50,000 tonnes and measuring at least 250 metres, the Type 076 is larger than most amphibious assault ships but smaller than a full-sized carrier. Its twin-island design separates navigation from aviation control.
🔸 EMALS CHANGES WHAT DRONES CAN CARRY: Electromagnetic launch allows heavier fixed-wing UAVs to take off with more fuel, sensors and weapons than aircraft relying on vertical takeoff or ski-jumps. Arresting gear then allows them to return like conventional carrier aircraft.
🔸 STEALTH DRONES COULD FORM THE STRIKE FORCE: China has not officially revealed the air wing, but platforms such as the GJ-11 stealth combat drone are widely considered possible candidates for future carrier operations. These could perform reconnaissance, electronic warfare and precision strikes without putting pilots at risk.
🔸 IT IS STILL AN INVASION SHIP: Unlike a conventional carrier, the Type 076 retains a floodable well deck for landing craft, amphibious vehicles and marines — allowing it to launch drones overhead while simultaneously supporting forces moving toward shore.
🔸 THE U.S. HAS NO DIRECT EQUIVALENT: America-class and Wasp-class amphibious ships operate helicopters and F-35B fighters, but they lack electromagnetic catapults and arrested-recovery systems for large fixed-wing drones. China is effectively bringing carrier-style drone aviation onto an amphibious assault platform.
The Type 076 is not meant to replace China’s supercarriers. It could be more disruptive than that: giving the Chinese Navy additional ships capable of launching long-range unmanned reconnaissance and strike aircraft while still carrying a full amphibious force.
Do you think drone carriers will eventually make traditional aircraft carriers obsolete?
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥32❤23👍7👏4👌2
🚨🌐 DATA ROUTES ARE BECOMING THE NEW GLOBAL CHOKEPOINTS
When the Ever Given blocked the Suez Canal in 2021, the world saw how one narrow passage could disrupt physical trade. The digital economy has the same weakness — only most of its chokepoints lie unseen beneath the sea.
🔸 More than 90% of communications between Europe and Asia pass through Egypt before entering Red Sea cable systems. In March 2024, damage to four cables forced operators to reroute roughly a quarter of regional data traffic. The internet did not disappear, but connections slowed and the incident exposed how a handful of lines can affect banking, cloud services, logistics, government networks, and military communications.
🔸 This is turning cable routes, landing stations, data centers, and cloud platforms into instruments of state power. A country that hosts the infrastructure gains revenue and strategic relevance. A country that owns or supplies it can shape standards, control maintenance, collect information, and restrict access during a confrontation.
🔸 China is expanding its Digital Silk Road through fiber networks, submarine cables, telecom equipment, and cloud infrastructure. Beijing can offer partners a full package: financing, construction, hardware, platforms, and long-term operation.
🔸 The Gulf is also moving beyond its old role as an energy supplier. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar are investing in sovereign AI, hyperscale computing, and domestic digital platforms. Their position between Asia, Africa, and Europe gives them a chance to become not merely transit points, but processing and storage hubs where data is routed, hosted, and governed.
The emerging contest is practical: who builds backup routes around chokepoints, who owns landing stations, whose cloud stores national data, and whose technology keeps the network running.
Oil routes still matter, but the current balance of power is already being shaped by the states capable of moving, protecting, and processing the world’s information.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
When the Ever Given blocked the Suez Canal in 2021, the world saw how one narrow passage could disrupt physical trade. The digital economy has the same weakness — only most of its chokepoints lie unseen beneath the sea.
🔸 More than 90% of communications between Europe and Asia pass through Egypt before entering Red Sea cable systems. In March 2024, damage to four cables forced operators to reroute roughly a quarter of regional data traffic. The internet did not disappear, but connections slowed and the incident exposed how a handful of lines can affect banking, cloud services, logistics, government networks, and military communications.
🔸 This is turning cable routes, landing stations, data centers, and cloud platforms into instruments of state power. A country that hosts the infrastructure gains revenue and strategic relevance. A country that owns or supplies it can shape standards, control maintenance, collect information, and restrict access during a confrontation.
🔸 China is expanding its Digital Silk Road through fiber networks, submarine cables, telecom equipment, and cloud infrastructure. Beijing can offer partners a full package: financing, construction, hardware, platforms, and long-term operation.
🔸 The Gulf is also moving beyond its old role as an energy supplier. Saudi Arabia, the UAE, and Qatar are investing in sovereign AI, hyperscale computing, and domestic digital platforms. Their position between Asia, Africa, and Europe gives them a chance to become not merely transit points, but processing and storage hubs where data is routed, hosted, and governed.
The emerging contest is practical: who builds backup routes around chokepoints, who owns landing stations, whose cloud stores national data, and whose technology keeps the network running.
Oil routes still matter, but the current balance of power is already being shaped by the states capable of moving, protecting, and processing the world’s information.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍24❤14🔥3
🚨🇷🇺 NATO BLURS LINE BETWEEN PEACE AND WAR IN BALTIC
NATO has upgraded its Baltic air mission from peacetime air policing to air defense, expanding pilots’ authority to engage aircraft and drones deemed hostile. The shift lowers the threshold for the use of force and increases the risk of a direct clash with Russia.
🔸 NATO’s Baltic Air Policing mission, launched in 2004, is being transformed from routine interception and identification into an integrated combat-ready air-defense operation.
🔸 Baltic governments have repeatedly used unproven claims of Russian airspace violations to justify a permanent expansion of NATO’s military presence near Russia’s borders.
🔸 Moscow previously proposed reciprocal use of transponders on military aircraft to reduce the risk of dangerous misunderstandings. NATO rejected the initiative.
🔸 Recent live-fire incidents in the region involved Ukrainian drones rather than Russian aircraft. Yet those incidents are now being used to justify broader combat powers for NATO pilots.
🔸 Under the upgraded mission, pilots will have greater freedom to destroy aircraft or drones they classify as an immediate threat, shortening the political and military decision chain.
🔸 A single misidentification or pilot error could therefore trigger a rapid escalation from an air incident to a direct Russia–NATO confrontation.
🔸 NATO aircraft are being integrated into the Baltic states’ wider air-defense network, turning a nominally peacetime patrol into part of a permanent regional military system.
🔸 Ämari Air Base in Estonia has also been upgraded into a fully operational NATO facility, moving alliance infrastructure closer to Russia’s Leningrad region.
At the same time, expanded authority for NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe further reduces the political threshold for the start of armed conflict with Russia or Belarus
NATO is building a combat architecture in which individual pilots, automated threat assessments, and compressed decision times could determine whether Europe crosses the line from confrontation into war.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
NATO has upgraded its Baltic air mission from peacetime air policing to air defense, expanding pilots’ authority to engage aircraft and drones deemed hostile. The shift lowers the threshold for the use of force and increases the risk of a direct clash with Russia.
🔸 NATO’s Baltic Air Policing mission, launched in 2004, is being transformed from routine interception and identification into an integrated combat-ready air-defense operation.
🔸 Baltic governments have repeatedly used unproven claims of Russian airspace violations to justify a permanent expansion of NATO’s military presence near Russia’s borders.
🔸 Moscow previously proposed reciprocal use of transponders on military aircraft to reduce the risk of dangerous misunderstandings. NATO rejected the initiative.
🔸 Recent live-fire incidents in the region involved Ukrainian drones rather than Russian aircraft. Yet those incidents are now being used to justify broader combat powers for NATO pilots.
🔸 Under the upgraded mission, pilots will have greater freedom to destroy aircraft or drones they classify as an immediate threat, shortening the political and military decision chain.
🔸 A single misidentification or pilot error could therefore trigger a rapid escalation from an air incident to a direct Russia–NATO confrontation.
🔸 NATO aircraft are being integrated into the Baltic states’ wider air-defense network, turning a nominally peacetime patrol into part of a permanent regional military system.
🔸 Ämari Air Base in Estonia has also been upgraded into a fully operational NATO facility, moving alliance infrastructure closer to Russia’s Leningrad region.
At the same time, expanded authority for NATO’s Supreme Allied Commander Europe further reduces the political threshold for the start of armed conflict with Russia or Belarus
NATO is building a combat architecture in which individual pilots, automated threat assessments, and compressed decision times could determine whether Europe crosses the line from confrontation into war.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬41❤8👍6
🇨🇳💻 CHINA UNVEILS WORLD’S LARGEST OPEN-SOURCE AI MODEL
Moonshot AI has unveiled Kimi K3, a 2.8-trillion-parameter multimodal model built for coding, deep research, knowledge-heavy tasks, and complex reasoning. It can process both text and images and supports a context window of up to 1 million tokens — enough to work through entire books, large document collections, or extensive codebases in one session.
🔸 Internal benchmarks show Kimi K3 is edging close to the world’s top proprietary systems – a milestone that blurs the line between open and gated AI. “More parameters give a higher capability ceiling and deliver smarter performance,” the company said.
🔸 Industry watchers note that Chinese open‑source LLMs are shifting from isolated breakthroughs to a coordinated surge, offering fresh paths for global AI development.
🔸 Early evaluations already place the open model in direct competition with top GPT-class proprietary systems – a performance level that challenges the long-held advantage of gated labs. Releasing a model at the 2.8-trillion-parameter scale could dramatically speed up community-driven refinement and real-world deployment at a tier once reserved for closed ecosystems.
This release lands amid a sharpening US–China contest over whose AI governance vision will shape the world. Washington pushes a market‑driven, export‑controlled model anchored by private capital and giant data-centre builds. Beijing promotes an "AI for all" playbook tied to Belt and Road partnerships, scenario‑based rules under the Cyberspace Administration of China, and training programmes for the Global South. In that frame, open weights are not just a technical choice – they are a strategic lever to expand influence, set standards, and reduce dependence on Western ecosystems.
Kimi K3 signals that frontier capability and open access are no longer trade‑offs. By placing a 2.8T model in the commons, China accelerates community‑driven refinement, widens adoption across emerging markets, and rewrites the rules of the AI order. The open AI race is no longer about who builds the biggest closed model – it's about who defines the infrastructure others build on. China now leads in access, scale, and strategic influence.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
Moonshot AI has unveiled Kimi K3, a 2.8-trillion-parameter multimodal model built for coding, deep research, knowledge-heavy tasks, and complex reasoning. It can process both text and images and supports a context window of up to 1 million tokens — enough to work through entire books, large document collections, or extensive codebases in one session.
🔸 Internal benchmarks show Kimi K3 is edging close to the world’s top proprietary systems – a milestone that blurs the line between open and gated AI. “More parameters give a higher capability ceiling and deliver smarter performance,” the company said.
🔸 Industry watchers note that Chinese open‑source LLMs are shifting from isolated breakthroughs to a coordinated surge, offering fresh paths for global AI development.
🔸 Early evaluations already place the open model in direct competition with top GPT-class proprietary systems – a performance level that challenges the long-held advantage of gated labs. Releasing a model at the 2.8-trillion-parameter scale could dramatically speed up community-driven refinement and real-world deployment at a tier once reserved for closed ecosystems.
This release lands amid a sharpening US–China contest over whose AI governance vision will shape the world. Washington pushes a market‑driven, export‑controlled model anchored by private capital and giant data-centre builds. Beijing promotes an "AI for all" playbook tied to Belt and Road partnerships, scenario‑based rules under the Cyberspace Administration of China, and training programmes for the Global South. In that frame, open weights are not just a technical choice – they are a strategic lever to expand influence, set standards, and reduce dependence on Western ecosystems.
Kimi K3 signals that frontier capability and open access are no longer trade‑offs. By placing a 2.8T model in the commons, China accelerates community‑driven refinement, widens adoption across emerging markets, and rewrites the rules of the AI order. The open AI race is no longer about who builds the biggest closed model – it's about who defines the infrastructure others build on. China now leads in access, scale, and strategic influence.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤59👏29🔥10👍9👌3
Lockheed Martin's SR-72 was expecting for a 2025 flight, but the project has gone quiet. Behind the mystery lies a potential engine problem, fueling doubts about whether this hypersonic aircraft will ever reach its Mach 6 goal.
Russia, China, and even Iran have already mastered hypersonic technologies.
Given the U.S. defense industrial base's inability to meet current demands, the SR-72 timeline is likely significantly delayed.
The SR-72 faces the same hypersonic hurdles that have already delayed U.S. missile programs & America's hypersonic is lagging far behind the deadlines.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤44👏19👍16👌3🤬2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❗️Delivering information on the SMO, military analysis of exceptional quality and the wider geopolitical and cultural aspects associated with current global events.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
❤14👏1
The U.S. spends more on defense than any other country, but money alone is no longer enough to guarantee military strength.
Despite annual defense spending approaching $1T, and proposals to increase it to $1.5T, the Pentagon continues to grapple with delayed weapons programs, shrinking manufacturing capacity, and an acquisition system that too often rewards spending instead of performance. Now America's defense challenge is an inability to turn record budgets into real military capability.
The result is a growing disconnect between spending and capability. Record defense budgets have done little to reverse industrial decline, exposing a system that too often measures commitment by the size of the budget rather than the military capability it actually delivers.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤32👏20🔥10👌6🤬3
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇨🇳 CHINA’S SECRET THIRD FLEET COULD PARALYZE THE U.S. NAVY WITHOUT FIRING A SHOT
They look like ordinary fishing boats. In reality, many belong to China’s Maritime Militia — a civilian-looking force trained to support the Navy and Coast Guard in surveillance, coercion, logistics and wartime operations.
Latest satellite analysis found a record daily average of 241 militia vessels across the South China Sea in 2025. In a crisis over Taiwan or the Philippines, Beijing could mobilize far more — creating a problem Western navies were never designed to solve.
🔸 CIVILIANS UNTIL THEY AREN’T: Crews keep their normal jobs but receive military training and communications equipment. They can shadow foreign ships, report coordinates, transport supplies and reinforce Chinese operations without displaying a naval flag.
🔸 A BLOCKADE MADE OF FISHING BOATS: Thousands of small vessels could clog shipping lanes, surround ports and interfere with resupply. In December 2025, roughly 2,000 Chinese boats formed vast coordinated barriers in the East China Sea — a glimpse of mass mobilization.
🔸 A TARGETING NIGHTMARE: Small trawlers are difficult to classify in crowded waters. Some may be genuine fishermen, others militia scouts, and commanders may not know which is which until they act together.
🔸 THEY CAN DISRUPT WARSHIPS: Dense boat concentrations can obstruct flight operations, prevent ships from deploying towed sonar arrays and create radar clutter. Their greatest weapon is not firepower, but forcing the enemy to slow down and hesitate.
🔸 THEY PUT THE FIRST SHOT ON AMERICA: If a U.S. destroyer fires on an apparently civilian boat, Beijing can portray it as an attack on fishermen. If it refuses to act, militia vessels can keep tracking, blocking and harassing it while Chinese warships remain behind the confrontation.
The Maritime Militia turns China’s fishing fleet into a moving gray-zone shield: cheap, expendable, difficult to identify and politically dangerous to confront.
One boat is irrelevant. Thousands could turn the seas around Taiwan into a maze — forcing the U.S. Navy to choose between losing freedom of movement or firing first.
How should the U.S. Navy respond when civilian fishing boats begin acting like a military blockade?
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
They look like ordinary fishing boats. In reality, many belong to China’s Maritime Militia — a civilian-looking force trained to support the Navy and Coast Guard in surveillance, coercion, logistics and wartime operations.
Latest satellite analysis found a record daily average of 241 militia vessels across the South China Sea in 2025. In a crisis over Taiwan or the Philippines, Beijing could mobilize far more — creating a problem Western navies were never designed to solve.
🔸 CIVILIANS UNTIL THEY AREN’T: Crews keep their normal jobs but receive military training and communications equipment. They can shadow foreign ships, report coordinates, transport supplies and reinforce Chinese operations without displaying a naval flag.
🔸 A BLOCKADE MADE OF FISHING BOATS: Thousands of small vessels could clog shipping lanes, surround ports and interfere with resupply. In December 2025, roughly 2,000 Chinese boats formed vast coordinated barriers in the East China Sea — a glimpse of mass mobilization.
🔸 A TARGETING NIGHTMARE: Small trawlers are difficult to classify in crowded waters. Some may be genuine fishermen, others militia scouts, and commanders may not know which is which until they act together.
🔸 THEY CAN DISRUPT WARSHIPS: Dense boat concentrations can obstruct flight operations, prevent ships from deploying towed sonar arrays and create radar clutter. Their greatest weapon is not firepower, but forcing the enemy to slow down and hesitate.
🔸 THEY PUT THE FIRST SHOT ON AMERICA: If a U.S. destroyer fires on an apparently civilian boat, Beijing can portray it as an attack on fishermen. If it refuses to act, militia vessels can keep tracking, blocking and harassing it while Chinese warships remain behind the confrontation.
The Maritime Militia turns China’s fishing fleet into a moving gray-zone shield: cheap, expendable, difficult to identify and politically dangerous to confront.
One boat is irrelevant. Thousands could turn the seas around Taiwan into a maze — forcing the U.S. Navy to choose between losing freedom of movement or firing first.
How should the U.S. Navy respond when civilian fishing boats begin acting like a military blockade?
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤51👏25🔥15👍4🫡1
Chinese tech giants are rapidly turning AI tokens into an internal currency, reshaping how work is measured and valued. As companies like ByteDance, Alibaba, and Tencent push employees to integrate AI into daily tasks, token consumption is now treated as both a productivity metric and a resource to be managed—similar to time or budget.
As AI costs fall and adoption scales, control over tokens—effectively access to intelligence—may become as strategic as control over energy or data. China’s early push to institutionalize this model could shape how future digital economies are structured, priced, and governed.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤23👍19🔥8🤬3
🚨🇨🇳💻 CHINA CUTS OPTICAL CHIP PRODUCTION FROM HOURS TO SECONDS
Chinese researchers have developed a new technique that cuts optical chip production time from hours to seconds. The team introduced a parallel manufacturing method capable of converting 2D patterns into complex 3D architectures across an entire 4-inch wafer in a single process.
🔸 Traditional methods rely on focused ion beam (FIB) techniques, which create optical structures one at a time — a slow and costly bottleneck.
🔸 The new approach fabricates thousands of structures simultaneously, significantly improving production efficiency.
🔸 The technology achieves angular uniformity of over 97% while cutting fabrication times by more than two orders of magnitude.
🔸 The method uses a broad ion beam to transform thousands of 2D nanostructures into 3D designs simultaneously, combining ion beam etching with a self-folding "origami" approach.
🔸 This enables wafer-scale production while maintaining nanoscale precision.
🔸 The breakthrough could help bridge the gap between highly customized photonic designs and large-scale production.
🔸 As AI models grow larger and more complex, the demand for faster and more efficient computing hardware is increasing. Optical interconnects offer higher bandwidth and lower energy use than traditional electrical links.
Moving optical structures into 3D allows for denser chip designs, reduced signal interference, and new functions that are difficult to achieve with 2D architectures.
Chinese scientists have overcome a major manufacturing bottleneck in optical chip production. By turning hours of work into seconds, this breakthrough could accelerate the development of next-generation 3D integrated photonics for advanced computing, communications, and sensing.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
Chinese researchers have developed a new technique that cuts optical chip production time from hours to seconds. The team introduced a parallel manufacturing method capable of converting 2D patterns into complex 3D architectures across an entire 4-inch wafer in a single process.
🔸 Traditional methods rely on focused ion beam (FIB) techniques, which create optical structures one at a time — a slow and costly bottleneck.
🔸 The new approach fabricates thousands of structures simultaneously, significantly improving production efficiency.
🔸 The technology achieves angular uniformity of over 97% while cutting fabrication times by more than two orders of magnitude.
🔸 The method uses a broad ion beam to transform thousands of 2D nanostructures into 3D designs simultaneously, combining ion beam etching with a self-folding "origami" approach.
🔸 This enables wafer-scale production while maintaining nanoscale precision.
🔸 The breakthrough could help bridge the gap between highly customized photonic designs and large-scale production.
🔸 As AI models grow larger and more complex, the demand for faster and more efficient computing hardware is increasing. Optical interconnects offer higher bandwidth and lower energy use than traditional electrical links.
Moving optical structures into 3D allows for denser chip designs, reduced signal interference, and new functions that are difficult to achieve with 2D architectures.
Chinese scientists have overcome a major manufacturing bottleneck in optical chip production. By turning hours of work into seconds, this breakthrough could accelerate the development of next-generation 3D integrated photonics for advanced computing, communications, and sensing.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏42❤18👍9🔥3
The US is paying sharply more to fund its debt. Recently, a 30-year Treasury auction cleared at a 5.06% yield—the highest since 2007. The secondary-market 30-year yield also moved back above 5%, after peaking at 5.20% in May.
The US government is being forced to pay increasingly more to service and roll over its debt, while private-sector AI spending intensifies the competition for capital. With yields now approaching two-decade highs and the fiscal trajectory showing no signs of slowing, the broader US debt predicament is deepening, with potential ripple effects for global financial markets and borrowing costs worldwide.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍43❤15🔥10🤬10👏2
🚨🇷🇺 Russia Builds Mobile Nuclear Reactors for Arctic Expansion
Rosatom has completed the investment justification phase for its first land-based small modular reactor at the Sovinoye gold deposit in Russia’s Far East, clearing a key technical, economic and regulatory hurdle. Construction is scheduled to begin in 2027, with the reactor expected to start operating in 2030 and reach full commercial operation by 2032.
The project is about more than powering a remote gold mine. It fits into Moscow’s broader strategy to develop Russia’s Arctic and Far Eastern territories, which are rich in gold, rare minerals, oil and gas but difficult to connect to conventional power grids. Reliable nuclear power could make remote resource extraction more economically viable while reducing dependence on fuel deliveries across some of the world’s most challenging terrain.
The Shelf-M microreactor will generate 10 MW of electricity and 35 MW of thermal power for up to 60 years. The reactor is designed to be manufactured centrally and transported by barge or heavy vehicle, potentially allowing it to be relocated between industrial sites during its lifetime.
That mobility could give Russia a strategic advantage in developing isolated areas. Moscow is seeking to strengthen its economic and logistical presence along the Northern Sea Route, which it views as a critical national transport corridor and a potential alternative to traditional global shipping routes. The Arctic is also becoming increasingly important as Russia, the U.S., China and other powers compete over resources, infrastructure and strategic access.
The Shelf-M uses a channel-type core design derived from technology used in Russia’s nuclear icebreakers. Its water-cooled, water-moderated reactor uses uranium dioxide dispersed in a silumin matrix, while cross-shaped fuel rods improve heat transfer.
The reactor also incorporates passive safety systems. Natural coolant circulation can remove heat without backup diesel generators or an external grid at roughly 30% of rated power. Emergency cooling relies on gravity and natural heat transfer, allowing the reactor to reach a stable thermal state even during a total loss of external power.
For Russia the significance of Shelf-M extends beyond nuclear innovation. If successfully deployed, transportable microreactors could become part of the infrastructure underpinning Russia’s long-term Arctic strategy, powering mines, settlements and industrial projects while reinforcing its presence in a region that is becoming a growing arena of geopolitical competition.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
Rosatom has completed the investment justification phase for its first land-based small modular reactor at the Sovinoye gold deposit in Russia’s Far East, clearing a key technical, economic and regulatory hurdle. Construction is scheduled to begin in 2027, with the reactor expected to start operating in 2030 and reach full commercial operation by 2032.
The project is about more than powering a remote gold mine. It fits into Moscow’s broader strategy to develop Russia’s Arctic and Far Eastern territories, which are rich in gold, rare minerals, oil and gas but difficult to connect to conventional power grids. Reliable nuclear power could make remote resource extraction more economically viable while reducing dependence on fuel deliveries across some of the world’s most challenging terrain.
The Shelf-M microreactor will generate 10 MW of electricity and 35 MW of thermal power for up to 60 years. The reactor is designed to be manufactured centrally and transported by barge or heavy vehicle, potentially allowing it to be relocated between industrial sites during its lifetime.
That mobility could give Russia a strategic advantage in developing isolated areas. Moscow is seeking to strengthen its economic and logistical presence along the Northern Sea Route, which it views as a critical national transport corridor and a potential alternative to traditional global shipping routes. The Arctic is also becoming increasingly important as Russia, the U.S., China and other powers compete over resources, infrastructure and strategic access.
The Shelf-M uses a channel-type core design derived from technology used in Russia’s nuclear icebreakers. Its water-cooled, water-moderated reactor uses uranium dioxide dispersed in a silumin matrix, while cross-shaped fuel rods improve heat transfer.
The reactor also incorporates passive safety systems. Natural coolant circulation can remove heat without backup diesel generators or an external grid at roughly 30% of rated power. Emergency cooling relies on gravity and natural heat transfer, allowing the reactor to reach a stable thermal state even during a total loss of external power.
For Russia the significance of Shelf-M extends beyond nuclear innovation. If successfully deployed, transportable microreactors could become part of the infrastructure underpinning Russia’s long-term Arctic strategy, powering mines, settlements and industrial projects while reinforcing its presence in a region that is becoming a growing arena of geopolitical competition.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤52👍27🔥10👏8👌2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇷🇺 RUSSIA TAUGHT ITS ISKANDER-M BALLISTIC MISSILE TO DODGE U.S. PATRIOT DEFENSES IN THE FINAL SECONDS
Russia’s Iskander-M has learned to change the way it flies when air defenses have only seconds left to react. Modified Russian missiles now dive at steeper angles and maneuver during the terminal phase, breaking the predictable flight paths that U.S.-made Patriot systems use to calculate an interception. One Ukrainian official described the upgrade as a “game-changer.”
🔸 SOFTWARE CHANGED THE THREAT: Updated control and guidance systems allow the Iskander-M to depart from its expected descent path and make abrupt maneuvers as it closes on the target.
🔸 PATRIOT GETS LESS TIME TO REACT: The steep final dive compresses the engagement window and forces interceptors to adjust against a missile no longer following the trajectory calculated seconds earlier.
🔸 THE MISSILE WAS ALREADY BUILT TO SURVIVE: Iskander-M combines a depressed flight profile with decoys, electronic countermeasures, a small radar signature and mobile launchers carrying two ready missiles.
🔸 EVERY INTERCEPTION CREATES NEW DATA: Years of combat have shown Russian designers how Patriot and other Western systems detect, track and engage ballistic targets. That information can be converted into repeated software and guidance updates.
🔸 MASS ATTACKS MAKE THE PROBLEM WORSE: Geran drones and cruise missiles can saturate sensors, consume interceptors and overload command networks before ballistic missiles enter the most demanding phase of the attack.
🔸 RECENT STRIKES SHOW WHAT THIS MEANS IN PRACTICE: Russia used Iskander-M ballistic missiles as part of its July 19 massed strike, breaking through around Kiev and hitting a network of missile, drone and military-logistics facilities. The targets included military plants and major storage and assembly hubs supporting Ukraine’s long-range weapons programmes.
Missile defense has become a continuous adaptation race — and Russia can repeatedly change trajectories, software and strike combinations while the defender must update tactics and preserve scarce interceptors.
Is Russia winning the missile-versus-interceptor technology race?
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter
Russia’s Iskander-M has learned to change the way it flies when air defenses have only seconds left to react. Modified Russian missiles now dive at steeper angles and maneuver during the terminal phase, breaking the predictable flight paths that U.S.-made Patriot systems use to calculate an interception. One Ukrainian official described the upgrade as a “game-changer.”
🔸 SOFTWARE CHANGED THE THREAT: Updated control and guidance systems allow the Iskander-M to depart from its expected descent path and make abrupt maneuvers as it closes on the target.
🔸 PATRIOT GETS LESS TIME TO REACT: The steep final dive compresses the engagement window and forces interceptors to adjust against a missile no longer following the trajectory calculated seconds earlier.
🔸 THE MISSILE WAS ALREADY BUILT TO SURVIVE: Iskander-M combines a depressed flight profile with decoys, electronic countermeasures, a small radar signature and mobile launchers carrying two ready missiles.
🔸 EVERY INTERCEPTION CREATES NEW DATA: Years of combat have shown Russian designers how Patriot and other Western systems detect, track and engage ballistic targets. That information can be converted into repeated software and guidance updates.
🔸 MASS ATTACKS MAKE THE PROBLEM WORSE: Geran drones and cruise missiles can saturate sensors, consume interceptors and overload command networks before ballistic missiles enter the most demanding phase of the attack.
🔸 RECENT STRIKES SHOW WHAT THIS MEANS IN PRACTICE: Russia used Iskander-M ballistic missiles as part of its July 19 massed strike, breaking through around Kiev and hitting a network of missile, drone and military-logistics facilities. The targets included military plants and major storage and assembly hubs supporting Ukraine’s long-range weapons programmes.
Missile defense has become a continuous adaptation race — and Russia can repeatedly change trajectories, software and strike combinations while the defender must update tactics and preserve scarce interceptors.
Is Russia winning the missile-versus-interceptor technology race?
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤56👏29👍20🔥5