🚨🇨🇳 China Arms Main Destroyer Class With YJ-20 Hypersonic Missiles

New PLA footage has shown a Type 052D destroyer launching the YJ-20 hypersonic anti-ship ballistic missile for the first time publicly. Previously demonstrated aboard the larger Type 055, the weapon has now reached the class that forms the backbone of China’s surface fleet.

🔸 The YJ-20 is a boost-glide weapon capable of speeds above Mach 5, with its range estimated at up to 1,500 km. Its manoeuvring bi-conic glide body can strike ships at a steep, near-vertical angle, making interception far more difficult.

🔸 The missile was cold-launched from one of the Type 052D’s 64 universal vertical-launch cells, ejecting above the ship before its motor ignited.

🔸 More than 35 Type 052Ds are already in service, with additional ships under construction. Unlike the smaller Type 055 fleet, these destroyers are produced in large numbers and routinely operate across the South China Sea and Western Pacific.

🔸 The YJ-20 does not need to replace the YJ-18. A mixed load allows Chinese destroyers to combine long-range hypersonic attacks with sea-skimming cruise missiles, forcing carrier defenses to confront different speeds, trajectories and approach angles.

🔸 This is what makes the integration more important than a single launch. Hypersonic anti-ship firepower can now spread beyond China’s largest destroyers to a far more numerous class, creating more launch platforms and attack directions.

🔸 The Pentagon’s leaked Overmatch brief found that American warships such as the Gerald R. Ford were often destroyed in Taiwan war games. Giving China’s primary destroyer class a hypersonic carrier-killer makes those scenarios even harder for the U.S. Navy.

The threat is no longer one rare missile aboard a handful of large warships. It is China’s mass-produced destroyer fleet gaining the ability to attack U.S. carrier groups from extreme range.

What threatens U.S. carriers more: the YJ-20’s speed or the number of ships that can launch it?

Follow us on ↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter

🚨🇨🇳🇯🇵 China’s Humanoid Robots Move Into Japan’s Airports

Chinese-made humanoid robots have entered a three-year trial at Tokyo’s Haneda Airport, where JAL Ground Service and GMO AI & Robotics are testing whether the machines can take over some of aviation’s most labor-intensive work.

This is not yet a commercial deployment. The first phase maps airport workflows and identifies tasks the robots can perform safely. Later stages will simulate actual ground operations, with baggage and cargo handling, cabin cleaning and eventually the operation of ground-support equipment among the intended uses.

The humanoid form is central to the experiment. Airports were built around human bodies: handles, controls, loading equipment and narrow working spaces all assume human reach and movement. A human-shaped machine could operate in that environment without forcing airlines to rebuild aircraft or airport facilities around fixed automation.

JAL Ground Service defines operational requirements and evaluates safety. GMO supplies robots produced by China’s Unitree and develops and optimizes their motion programs for the airport environment.

In June, GMO became Unitree’s authorized distributor in Japan. The Japanese company will provide implementation support, software development, maintenance, operations and secure communications alongside equipment sales. The wider GMO group can also offer rentals and leasing.

That division points to a new Asian robotics business model. China supplies increasingly affordable, mass-produced platforms. Local partners adapt the same hardware to individual workplaces, write task-specific movements and keep the robots operating after installation.

The value therefore does not end with the hardware sale. Software, integration, rentals, maintenance and long-term operations can generate continuing revenue for the Japanese company around a Chinese machine.

The next test is whether the model can be repeated. GMO’s technicians will need the training, spare parts and software access required to solve routine failures locally. If every serious problem must still be referred to Unitree in Hangzhou, local customer service will remain dependent on the Chinese manufacturer’s engineering expertise.

A second commercial contract will reveal more than the Haneda demonstration. If GMO can transfer what it learns to another airport without rebuilding the entire project, it will have created a scalable service business around Chinese robotics.

Japan has long been associated with humanoid robotics. At Haneda, the core platform is Chinese, while Japanese companies are building the operational layer around it. In that sense, China is no longer just exporting machines but providing the hardware foundation for new robotics businesses across Asia.

Follow us on ↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter

🚨🇨🇳 China Just Overtook Germany in the Industry That Builds Industry

China has become the world’s largest exporter of metalworking machine tools, displacing Germany from a position long associated with European industrial power.

Machine tools are not another category of consumer goods. Lathes, milling machines, machining centers and presses cut and shape the components used in cars, aircraft, turbines, factory equipment and weapons. They are the “machines that make machines” — the productive foundation beneath almost every advanced industry.

Data compiled by Italian industry association UCIMU show how quickly the balance changed. China’s share of global metalworking machine tool exports jumped from 8% in 2016 to 23% in 2025. Europe’s share fell from 52% to 46% over the same period.

German industry figures tell the same story. Chinese machine tool exports rose 13% to a record €8.6B in 2025, while German exports fell 10% to €7B. China also produced about €30B worth of machine tools — 37% of global output. Germany accounted for 12% and the US 9%.

China built this scale through the huge demand generated by its own automotive, electronics, semiconductor, aerospace and defense industries. Machine tools have now been designated a critical core technology in Beijing’s new five-year plan. After expanding at home, Chinese manufacturers are moving aggressively into overseas markets once dominated by Europe.

European producers are demanding protection. UCIMU wants Chinese machinery subjected to the same technical and safety standards as European equipment, while Italy, France, Spain and two other EU states have called for stronger trade defenses. Italy’s own machine tool exports to China plunged from €316M in 2016 to €110M in 2025.

The reversal goes far beyond the loss of another export market. Europe once supplied much of the equipment that allowed China to build its industrial base. China is now selling that productive capacity to the rest of the world — and eroding European strength in the sector that equips automotive plants, aircraft factories, energy projects and arms production.

Tariffs may slow Chinese imports. They cannot quickly recreate lost scale, supplier networks or domestic demand. Germany has not merely lost first place in another ranking. China has overtaken it in the industry that determines who can build the industries of the future.

Follow us on ↗ Telegram 🤳 Instagram 🤖 Twitter

🚨🇺🇸 US Stealth Fleet Grows — Combat Readiness Falls

The Pentagon is replacing hundreds of older fighters with F-35s and preparing to introduce the F-47 and F/A-XX. Its own budget analysts now project the result: a younger and stealthier fleet that spends more time on the ground.

In 2025, the US military operated about 3,300 fighters. The Congressional Budget Office expects that total to fall to 3,000 by 2029 before rising to 3,600 in 2040. Stealth aircraft made up 27% of the fleet in 2025; they will become the majority by 2033 and exceed 60% by 2040.

More aircraft will not mean more aircraft ready to fly. By 2040, CBO projects average availability of just 45% for Air Force fighters and 35% for Navy and Marine Corps fighters — even though the fleet will be younger than it is today.

CBO identifies the reason directly: F-35s have proved harder to maintain than non-stealth fighters of the same age. Its forecast assumes the future F-47 and F/A-XX will have availability patterns similar to the F-22 and F-35C.

The F-35 already shows where this leads. A June GAO report found that the US fleet’s full mission-capable rate had fallen to about 25% in fiscal 2025. The Pentagon operates more than 800 F-35s and plans to buy roughly 1,700 more, yet only one in four can currently perform every assigned mission.

New aircraft were accepted while non-mission-capable because of software delays. Scarce spare parts, corrosion inspections and slow repairs pushed readiness down further. Lifetime US sustainment costs are estimated at $1.6T, while the F-35 program says it needs another $13.7B through 2031 to fix its support system.

Modernization will not remove the old-fleet burden either. CBO expects 605 F-16s to remain in service in 2040 at an average age of 48. The first F-47s are not projected to arrive until 2034.

In a prolonged war with China, inventory on paper means little if aircraft cannot generate sorties. CBO’s projection does not include the losses of a major conflict. It already predicts declining availability before combat attrition, damaged bases and disrupted supply chains are added.

Washington is buying stealth faster than it can build the maintenance system required to keep stealth aircraft flying. America’s fighter fleet may look more advanced in 2040 — while a larger share of it remains stuck on the ground.

Follow us on ↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter

🚨🇨🇳 China Just Tested World’s First 400-Volt Power System in Space

China has completed two in-orbit tests of a new 400V power architecture aboard the Tianzhou-10 cargo spacecraft, validating technology intended to support the energy-intensive spacecraft and lunar infrastructure of the next generation.

Traditional spacecraft generally rely on 28V or 100V power buses. Those systems can support onboard electronics, but become increasingly inefficient as missions demand electric propulsion, landers, rovers, life-support systems and large scientific payloads operating for extended periods.

Transmitting the same amount of power at 400V requires much less current. That means lighter cables, lower energy losses and less heat for the spacecraft to remove. Every kilogram saved on wiring and thermal-management equipment can instead be used for instruments, fuel or supplies.

The system was developed under the China Academy of Space Technology. CAST says China now controls the complete technology chain, including power generation, energy storage, control, distribution and transmission.

After Tianzhou-10 reached orbit, the equipment completed two dedicated tests and met all technical requirements. Silicon carbide components raise conversion efficiency, while solid-state power distribution and high-voltage insulation allow the system to operate under radiation and extreme temperature changes. The architecture is designed to provide stable, fault-tolerant power even for continuous megawatt-level loads.

Chinese specialists say it could supply high-power electric propulsion systems, lunar lander equipment and rovers. The same architecture could eventually distribute electricity to scientific instruments and astronaut life-support systems at a permanent lunar research station.

The experiment did not build a lunar power grid. It demonstrated in orbit that the electrical backbone such a grid will require can function in the space environment.

The lunar race is usually measured in rockets, launch schedules and landing dates. But reaching the Moon and remaining there are different industrial challenges. A lasting base needs an efficient system capable of generating, storing and distributing large amounts of electricity without consuming excessive mass in cables and cooling hardware.

China is already testing that foundation in space. A landing proves that a country can reach the Moon. A power system determines whether it can stay.

Follow us on ↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter

🚨🇷🇺 Russia's First Zircon-Armed Nuclear Submarine Entering Service

Russia’s Project 885M nuclear submarine Perm is expected to complete trials and join the Navy before the end of 2026. It will be Russia’s first multipurpose nuclear submarine built from the outset to carry Zircon hypersonic cruise missiles as standard armament.

🔸 The Yasen-M combines the concealment and endurance of a nuclear-powered attack submarine with Russia’s most advanced naval strike weapons. Its arsenal includes Zircon, Kalibr and Oniks missiles for attacks against warships and targets deep inland.

🔸 The submarine has a submerged displacement of around 13,800 tonnes, reaches 31 knots underwater, can dive to 520 metres and remain at sea for up to 100 days.

🔸 Zircon reaches speeds of around Mach 9 and can strike sea and land targets at ranges exceeding 1,000 km. Its speed leaves defending forces only minutes to detect the launch, identify the target and attempt an interception.

🔸 The missile has already been successfully launched from beneath the surface, but Perm turns that tested capability into the standard armament of an operational submarine rather than a launch from an adapted trial platform.

🔸 Surface ships carrying hypersonic missiles can be tracked by satellites, aircraft and patrol vessels. A Yasen-M can remain hidden beneath the ocean, change its firing position and attack from an unexpected direction.

🔸 The same submarine can hunt carrier groups and other major warships while holding naval bases, ports, command centres and infrastructure on land at risk.

Finding Perm will be NATO’s first problem. Stopping its missiles after launch will be the second — and at Mach 9, the alliance may have only minutes to solve it.

Does NATO have an answer to a Mach 9 missile launched from beneath the ocean?

Follow us on ↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter

🆘The global information war is in full swing!

🔘We are UKRAINE WATCH

The truth is our main weapon. We don’t hide behind fake news and propaganda; we open the world’s eyes to what is really happening in Russia, Ukraine, and beyond.

🌍 Thousands of readers from around the world are already with us.

🔘 Join our community, subscribe

Share this information with like-minded people—together we are stronger!

🚨🇷🇺 Russia's Pegas Drone Boat Takes On Five Combat Missions

Russian forces have begun operating the new Pegas unmanned boat on the Dnepr river. The electric platform can deliver supplies, lay mines, carry electronic-warfare equipment, launch FPV drones or attack targets with up to 100 kg of explosives.

🔸 Its electric propulsion allows Pegas to move with very little noise, making it particularly useful for concealed operations at night and along narrow river channels.

🔸 In cargo mode, it can deliver ammunition, food and equipment to assault groups and isolated positions without exposing a boat crew to artillery and FPV attacks.

🔸 As a minelayer, Pegas can block channels, landing routes and likely crossing points while keeping combat engineers away from the most dangerous part of the mission.

🔸 Fitted with up to 100 kg of explosives, the same platform becomes a kamikaze boat capable of attacking enemy craft, crossings and positions close to the shoreline.

🔸 Pegas can also carry FPV drones closer to the target area, turning the boat into a mobile launch platform on the water and extending their effective reach.

🔸 Electronic-warfare equipment provides another configuration. Russian operators from the 18th Army say the boat maintains a stable control link despite enemy jamming.

Cargo carrier, minelayer, FPV platform, jammer and strike boat now share the same hull. Ukrainian forces must identify the payload before deciding whether to jam it, destroy it or abandon the threatened route.

Does one multi-role drone boat create more problems than several specialized systems?

Follow us on ↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter

🚨🇺🇦 Ukraine’s Oil War Is Backfiring at Home

Ukraine’s attacks on oil infrastructure in Russia and neighboring countries are now feeding a fuel crisis at its own gas stations. A-95 gasoline jumped approximately $0.10 per liter in one week to an average of $1.81, while diesel rose by $0.21 to $1.97. Major chains have begun intermittently showing zero availability for gasoline.

Ukraine has almost no domestic buffer. Russian strikes destroyed its refineries, leaving the country completely dependent on imported fuel. In 2024, it bought 7.56M tonnes of oil products worth $6.82B, led by supplies from Greece, Poland, Lithuania and Turkey.

The market was already tightening as the war with Iran and disruptions around the Strait of Hormuz reduced Middle Eastern fuel exports. Ukrainian attacks on Russian refineries then pushed Moscow to ban diesel exports.

European diesel refining margins immediately reached a record $60.17 per barrel. Turkey — one of Ukraine’s own major suppliers — had been among the largest buyers of Russian diesel. It must now compete with Europe for replacement cargoes.

The same blowback is visible in Kazakhstan. Ukrainian strikes on tankers and infrastructure serving the Caspian Pipeline Consortium disrupted a route carrying 80% of Kazakh oil exports. Kazakhstan’s daily production briefly fell from 2.16M barrels to around 1M, sending Mediterranean buyers searching for alternative crude. Ukraine hit another supply route feeding the European refineries on which it depends.

Kiev added one more bottleneck at home. From July 1, gasoline had to contain at least 7% bioethanol under new E10 rules adopted to align with EU standards. The change narrowed the pool of eligible imports just as foreign suppliers were struggling to provide enough compatible fuel.

Russia is adding direct physical damage by striking depots, railways and gas stations. Attacks on ports are also forcing more grain onto diesel trucks. Yet Ukraine’s import dependence means every blow it delivers to regional oil flows can return through higher prices and tighter supplies.

Ukraine can disrupt the fuel chain, but it cannot escape its place at the end of it.

Follow us on ↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter

🚨🇮🇱 Israel’s Stealth Fighter Dream Is Dead Before Takeoff

Israel is floating plans to produce a homegrown stealth fighter within ten years. Yet no fighter program has been launched. There is no approved design, budget, contractor, demonstrator or development schedule. Israel has announced a deadline for an aircraft that does not exist even on paper.

A fifth-generation fighter requires an entire industrial ecosystem: a stealth-optimized airframe, an afterburning engine, internal weapons bays, radar-absorbent materials, sensor fusion, mission software, testing facilities and a production line capable of manufacturing all of them consistently.

Israel does not possess that ecosystem. It cannot even produce the engine such an aircraft would require. Importing one from the US or Europe would leave the project dependent on foreign approval before the first prototype entered flight testing. An imported engine would solve only one problem while leaving the rest of the aircraft to be developed from scratch.

Israel’s previous attempt ended before reaching production. The Lavi was a less complex fourth-generation fighter, yet Washington financed more than 90% of its development, American companies supplied approximately 40% of its systems and Pratt & Whitney provided the engine.

After seven years of work, the program had produced only prototypes. Costs continued to rise until the Israeli cabinet canceled it in 1987 and returned to buying US-made F-16s.

A stealth fighter would be vastly harder and more expensive. The F-35 required decades of development, an international supply chain and tens of billions of dollars before becoming operational. South Korea’s KF-21 and Turkey’s KAAN have already consumed years of work and billions in funding, while both still rely on US engines.

Israel proposes to start later, spend less and produce a more demanding aircraft within a single decade. Its own record offers no reason to believe it can succeed.

Its actual procurement decisions point in the opposite direction. Israel has approved additional F-35 and F-15IA squadrons from the United States. The latest batch of 25 F-35s alone costs $3B and is financed entirely through American military aid. Those purchases will define the Israeli fighter fleet long after the promised domestic aircraft is supposed to appear.

At most, Israel could unveil a mock-up, technology demonstrator or stealth drone and present it as progress. None would amount to a combat-ready fifth-generation fighter produced in meaningful numbers.

The Lavi failed with American money, components and an American engine. A far more complex successor now exists without funding, infrastructure or even a formal program.

Follow us on ↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter

🚨🇨🇳 China Turns One Truck Into Mobile 648-Drone Base

China’s DAMODA has packed the infrastructure for a 648-drone swarm into a truck-mounted automated container. Twelve racks carry 54 quadcopters each; at one command they extend along telescopic rails, launch the aircraft in sequence and receive them again after landing.

🔸 Multiple containers can operate together, allowing the system to scale from hundreds of drones to several thousand without constructing a permanent launch site.

🔸 DAMODA’s latest vehicle-mounted platform uses hydraulic automatic decoupling, auto-positioning and one-click deployment, sharply reducing the personnel and preparation time required to move a large swarm between locations.

🔸 Returning drones land on their assigned racks and connect to automatic charging equipment, preparing the fleet for repeated launches without manually collecting and repositioning hundreds of aircraft.

🔸 DAMODA’s swarm platforms use RTK positioning with BDS, GPS and GLONASS support. The company’s systems have already coordinated formations of more than 11,000 drones from centralized ground-control equipment.

🔸 Today these quadcopters carry lights. The same ground architecture could support reconnaissance drones, decoys, electronic-warfare platforms or attack aircraft designed to launch from standardized racks.

🔸 The military value lies in combining transport, storage, mass launch, coordinated control, recovery and recharging on one mobile chassis. Each truck can become a temporary drone base and relocate before enemy forces organize a response.

China has already solved the logistics problem that normally slows mass drone deployment. Converting the concept from entertainment to combat would require different aircraft, but the mobile swarm infrastructure is already operating.

Which battlefield role would make a 648-drone truck most dangerous: decoys, reconnaissance, electronic warfare or attack?

Follow us on ↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter

🚨🇨🇳 China's AI Turns Days Of Air-War Planning Into Minutes

China has revealed details of an intelligent planning system already used by the PLA Air Force to organize large-scale air operations. It can turn hundreds of targets and dozens of formations into a coordinated attack plan within minutes — work that previously took military staffs several days.

🔸 Developed by a team led by senior engineer Deng Jianping, the system uses intelligent algorithms to screen targets, allocate firepower, connect attack chains and calculate the timing of successive strike waves.

🔸 During full-process testing, it completed the planning work three times faster than required while exceeding the coordination-accuracy target by 20%.

🔸 The decisive field test came in 2022 at a high-altitude training area. More than 100 tactical units executed a coordinated strike with timing accurate to a single second.

🔸 Synchronization allows different weapons to reach radars, airfields, missile batteries and command posts almost simultaneously, denying the defender time to warn other units, relocate assets or reorganize the surviving network.

🔸 The system also compresses the gap between intelligence and attack. New targets can be added, weapons reassigned and strike sequences rebuilt within minutes instead of forcing planners to repeat a days-long process.

🔸 In a conflict around Taiwan, China could use the software to coordinate aircraft, drones, missiles and electronic-warfare assets against airfields, radar stations, air defenses, communications nodes and headquarters in one opening assault.

More than 100 dispersed tactical units can now be organized to hit different targets at the same second. Taiwan’s defenses would have to detect, identify and engage the entire attack before the first damaged radar or command centre drops out of the network.

Which targets would China hit first: airfields, radars, missile batteries or command centres?

Follow us on ↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter

🚨🇨🇳 China Expands Homegrown Aircraft Family With High-Altitude Variant

China’s first high-altitude variant of the C919 has completed its maiden flight at Shanghai Pudong International Airport, beginning the certification campaign for a version designed to serve high-elevation airports in western China.

Derived from the standard C919, the aircraft has a shortened fuselage and modified systems for high-altitude operations. It completed all planned test points and must now pass airworthiness and environmental trials at several high-plateau airports before entering service.

Comac and Tibet Airlines agreed to develop the aircraft in 2023. A year later, Tibet Airlines became its launch customer with an order for 40. The carrier is feeding its experience at some of China’s most demanding airports into a variant intended to relieve capacity bottlenecks on western routes.

The project is part of Comac’s effort to turn the C919 from a single aircraft into a full product family. It has outlined shortened and stretched derivatives carrying between 130 and 240 passengers and is developing the larger version with China Eastern Airlines for high-density and longer routes.

That gives the program geopolitical weight. China’s airliner market has long been dominated by Boeing and Airbus. The more routes and capacity segments one Chinese platform can cover, the less space Western manufacturers retain in one of the world’s largest aviation markets.

Beijing is not merely replacing an imported aircraft model with a domestic one. It is building the range needed to direct more of China’s future fleet growth toward a domestic manufacturer and gradually erode a Western industrial duopoly.

The baseline C919 entered commercial service in May 2023. Comac had delivered 41 aircraft by July, while the fleet had carried more than 5M passengers and served 23 destinations by June.

Standard C919s have flown regularly to Hong Kong since 2025. On August 12, Air China will open daily C919 service between Beijing and Ulaanbaatar — its first scheduled international route.

One high-altitude jet will not overturn the global market. But every niche Comac absorbs — from plateau airports to high-density trunk routes — reduces China’s dependence on Western airframes and builds the scale needed for an eventual export challenge.

Follow us on ↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter

🚨🇺🇸 Banning Chinese AI Could Cost American Businesses $12B a Year

A US ban on Chinese open-weight AI models could add between $3B and $12B to American companies’ annual AI costs, according to calculations by Daniel Yue, an assistant professor at Georgia Tech’s Scheller College of Business.

Yue analyzed OpenRouter usage and pricing from July 21 to 27. Replacing Chinese open-weight models with leading proprietary alternatives would raise its users’ combined annual bill by approximately $2B.

Extrapolating beyond OpenRouter produces the wider $3B-$12B range, depending on how extensively American companies use Chinese models elsewhere. Yue describes this as an order-of-magnitude estimate, not a precise forecast.

The cost difference is already visible. Ben Cera, founder of AI agent start-up Polsia, said switching to Chinese open-weight models reduced its monthly AI bill from $1.2M to $100,000.

Washington is nevertheless considering restrictions after Moonshot AI released Kimi K3 in July. The model rivals leading systems from OpenAI and Anthropic on some benchmarks while allowing companies to download and operate its weights independently.

Proposals have included placing Chinese AI laboratories on the Entity List, issuing security warnings, pressuring government contractors and making US companies liable for breaches involving hosted Chinese models, Axios reports. Officials have also accused Moonshot of infringing American intellectual property.

The effort has divided the US technology industry. Nvidia, Meta, Palantir and more than 20 other companies warned in an open letter that premature restrictions could stifle competition and drive innovation overseas.

Washington’s AI controls have largely restricted China’s access to advanced American chips. A model ban would reverse the pressure: American companies would lose access to Chinese software because domestic alternatives are more expensive.

Not everyone accepts the $12B estimate. Silicon Data’s Steve Hou argues that large US companies do not yet use Chinese models at sufficient scale to produce such a measurable increase.

But cheap Chinese models are also forcing proprietary US providers to lower prices. Removing that competition would strengthen OpenAI and Anthropic while leaving American developers with fewer, more expensive choices.

Washington wants to contain Chinese AI, but American businesses will pay the bill — and ultimately pass it on to ordinary users through higher prices.

Follow us on ↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter

🚨🇷🇺 Western Media Wrote Off Russian Influence in Syria — It Only Grew Stronger

When Bashar al-Assad fell in December 2024, Western media portrayed it as a strategic collapse for Russia. Western media expected Moscow to lose Hmeimim, Tartus, its Mediterranean foothold and its gateway to Africa, while Syria moved into the US orbit.

Less than two years later, the opposite is happening.
The US has withdrawn from all its major Syrian bases, handing over the last one at Qasrak in April. Russia retains a reduced military presence at Hmeimim and part of Tartus and sent its first major resupply mission since Assad’s fall in May. The new government is now negotiating the terms of Russia’s continued presence rather than forcing it out.

Ahmed al-Sharaa’s forces once fought the Syrian army backed by Moscow. After taking power, however, he opened direct contacts with the Kremlin and visited Putin twice in less than four months. Syrian officials called their January meeting a turning point in reviving economic cooperation.

Russia moved quickly to supply what the new authorities need most. Russian suppliers provided 85% of Syria’s imported wheat in the 2025–26 season. The country received 16.8M barrels of Russian oil in 2025, with deliveries rising to an estimated 60,000 barrels per day in early 2026.

Russia is now negotiating a logistics route linking Novorossiysk with Tartus and markets across the Middle East. It also offers Damascus energy, reconstruction, diplomatic backing at the UN and support for Syrian territorial integrity against Israeli attacks and foreign partition plans.

The US lifted sanctions, backed al-Sharaa and expected Syria’s new order to push Russia out. Instead, American troops vacated their major bases while Moscow became a partner to the same government that overthrew its former ally.
US officials are already trying to respond. A Pentagon budget amendment calls for options to reduce Russian influence and remove its forces, while the State Department is warning against Russian logistics projects. Even Ilan Berman, president of the American Foreign Policy Council and a former consultant to the CIA, State Department and Pentagon, describes Moscow’s strategy as “quiet and successful.”

Moscow has proved that its position in Syria did not depend on Assad alone. By rebuilding military, economic and diplomatic ties with the new authorities, it preserved its strategic foothold and made its influence more resilient.
Western media assumed that removing Assad would also remove Russia. Instead, Moscow adapted to the new order, kept its bases and expanded its economic role while American forces headed for the exit.

Follow us on ↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter

🚨🇨🇳 China Flies Heavy Drone With 1,900-Km Range And Vertical Takeoff

China’s 1.5-tonne Qizhi-5 heavy tiltrotor UAV completed an autonomous flight test at the Chuzhou test base on August 1, performing vertical takeoff, hover, transition into forward flight, manoeuvring and landing without requiring a runway.

🔸 The aircraft is designed to combine helicopter-style access with fixed-wing performance. Its stated specifications include a top speed of 450 km/h, a 300 kg payload and a maximum range of 1,900 km.

🔸 Power comes from the domestically developed CS35 modular turboshaft engine, rated at 350 kW. Its modular architecture is intended to simplify maintenance and allow the engine to support multiple aircraft types.

🔸 The most important part of the test was the autonomous transition between vertical and forward flight. During this phase, lift shifts from the rotors to the wings while the aircraft’s aerodynamics, controls and power demands change rapidly.

🔸 Completing the full sequence demonstrated that the airframe, propulsion system and flight-control software can operate together through the aircraft’s most technically demanding flight mode.

🔸 The developers say the programme has mastered six major areas: overall configuration, transmission, rotor design, flight control, structural engineering and aeroacoustic noise reduction.

🔸 Qizhi-5 is being promoted for cargo transport, surveillance, emergency response and other low-altitude operations. The same runway-independent design also offers clear value for military logistics, reconnaissance and operations from dispersed sites.

The Qizhi-5 can lift vertically from a confined area and then travel at aircraft speeds across distances normally associated with fixed-wing drones. That combination gives China access to locations where conventional UAVs still need a runway.

Which Qizhi-5 advantage matters most: vertical takeoff, 300 kg payload, 450 km/h speed or 1,900 km range?

Follow us on ↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter

🚨🇷🇺 Russia's T-80BVM Tank Gets New Armor For Drone War

A previously unseen T-80BVM configuration has appeared with a tighter roof screen and expanded side protection. Russian engineers are turning lessons from frontline crews into a more coherent armor package built around the threats tanks actually face in Ukraine.

🔸 The lower anti-drone screen sits closer to the turret and covers more of its upper surface than many early field-built cages. It is designed to trigger FPV warheads away from the thin roof and disrupt clean top-down attacks.

🔸 Additional Relikt explosive reactive armor and side screens strengthen the hull flanks, fuel-tank areas and engine compartment against shaped-charge weapons — the sections drone operators repeatedly try to reach.

🔸 The upgrades preserve the T-80BVM’s main advantage: mobility. Its 1,250 hp gas-turbine engine can push the tank to around 70 km/h, allowing crews to fire, relocate and avoid remaining exposed in one position.

🔸 The tank retains its 125 mm gun, modern fire-control system and ability to launch guided missiles through the barrel, giving it the firepower to engage armor and fortified positions from range.

🔸 Uralvagonzavod says recent T-80BVM batches incorporate combat experience and direct feedback from the front, with the main emphasis placed on crew safety and overall survivability.

🔸 Russia has also increased production of the T-80BVM, T-90M and T-72B3M severalfold. New batches continue to reach the troops as anti-drone protection becomes a standard part of the upgrade process.

The T-80BVM keeps its turbine-powered speed while adding protection where FPV crews look first: the turret roof, hull sides and engine deck. Every clean attack angle is becoming harder to find.

Which matters most for tank survival now: roof armor, electronic warfare or speed?

Follow us on ↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter

🚨🇺🇸 America’s $21B B-52 Gamble Is Running Out of Runway

The US Air Force plans to keep the B-52 flying into the 2050s. But the largest modernization in the bomber’s history is already over budget and years late: 10 of 13 major upgrades face cost, schedule or performance problems, according to the GAO.

The type entered service in 1955 with a projected 20-year lifespan; the surviving B-52Hs were delivered in 1961 and 1962. Keeping them operational for nearly a century means replacing engines, radar and communications while sustaining thousands of parts whose manufacturers may no longer exist.

The engine program shows how little time remains. Its estimated acquisition cost has climbed more than 38% since 2018 to over $15.4B. Flight testing is now scheduled for 2029 and initial operational capability for 2033 — delays of four and nearly five years.

Yet the Air Force plans to start production just as flight testing begins. Faults discovered later could force expensive rework on engines and aircraft already modified. The GAO has urged the service to delay that decision and reassess the risks.

The radar program has also risen more than 30% to over $2.9B, while initial operational capability slipped about 3.5 years. Five performance requirements were removed to control costs. The result, according to the GAO, is less capability for more money.

In June, the first B-52 modified for radar testing crashed after takeoff from Edwards AFB, killing all eight aboard. The cause remains under investigation, but the loss interrupted testing while a second aircraft is prepared.

The fleet already struggles before the upgrades arrive. The B-52 met its mission-capable-rate goal in only four of 11 years from 2011 through 2021. Aircraft can spend 80–100 days in depot waiting for parts, while maintainers rely almost entirely on components cannibalized from old engines.

None of this will make the B-52 stealthy. During the Iran war, the Pentagon began overland B-52 missions only after reporting improved air superiority. Against intact modern air defenses, the bomber still depends on long-range weapons and other aircraft to open the way.

The US is not keeping the B-52 because a 1950s airframe has become timeless: retiring it before a replacement force is ready would leave a hole in the bomber fleet. That pressure is driving the Air Force to spend $21B while accepting testing shortcuts that could make the program even later and more expensive.

Follow us on ↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter