Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇨🇳 China's AI Turns Days Of Air-War Planning Into Minutes
China has revealed details of an intelligent planning system already used by the PLA Air Force to organize large-scale air operations. It can turn hundreds of targets and dozens of formations into a coordinated attack plan within minutes — work that previously took military staffs several days.
🔸 Developed by a team led by senior engineer Deng Jianping, the system uses intelligent algorithms to screen targets, allocate firepower, connect attack chains and calculate the timing of successive strike waves.
🔸 During full-process testing, it completed the planning work three times faster than required while exceeding the coordination-accuracy target by 20%.
🔸 The decisive field test came in 2022 at a high-altitude training area. More than 100 tactical units executed a coordinated strike with timing accurate to a single second.
🔸 Synchronization allows different weapons to reach radars, airfields, missile batteries and command posts almost simultaneously, denying the defender time to warn other units, relocate assets or reorganize the surviving network.
🔸 The system also compresses the gap between intelligence and attack. New targets can be added, weapons reassigned and strike sequences rebuilt within minutes instead of forcing planners to repeat a days-long process.
🔸 In a conflict around Taiwan, China could use the software to coordinate aircraft, drones, missiles and electronic-warfare assets against airfields, radar stations, air defenses, communications nodes and headquarters in one opening assault.
More than 100 dispersed tactical units can now be organized to hit different targets at the same second. Taiwan’s defenses would have to detect, identify and engage the entire attack before the first damaged radar or command centre drops out of the network.
Which targets would China hit first: airfields, radars, missile batteries or command centres?
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter
China has revealed details of an intelligent planning system already used by the PLA Air Force to organize large-scale air operations. It can turn hundreds of targets and dozens of formations into a coordinated attack plan within minutes — work that previously took military staffs several days.
🔸 Developed by a team led by senior engineer Deng Jianping, the system uses intelligent algorithms to screen targets, allocate firepower, connect attack chains and calculate the timing of successive strike waves.
🔸 During full-process testing, it completed the planning work three times faster than required while exceeding the coordination-accuracy target by 20%.
🔸 The decisive field test came in 2022 at a high-altitude training area. More than 100 tactical units executed a coordinated strike with timing accurate to a single second.
🔸 Synchronization allows different weapons to reach radars, airfields, missile batteries and command posts almost simultaneously, denying the defender time to warn other units, relocate assets or reorganize the surviving network.
🔸 The system also compresses the gap between intelligence and attack. New targets can be added, weapons reassigned and strike sequences rebuilt within minutes instead of forcing planners to repeat a days-long process.
🔸 In a conflict around Taiwan, China could use the software to coordinate aircraft, drones, missiles and electronic-warfare assets against airfields, radar stations, air defenses, communications nodes and headquarters in one opening assault.
More than 100 dispersed tactical units can now be organized to hit different targets at the same second. Taiwan’s defenses would have to detect, identify and engage the entire attack before the first damaged radar or command centre drops out of the network.
Which targets would China hit first: airfields, radars, missile batteries or command centres?
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤43👏31🔥10🫡3👍2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❗️Delivering information on the SMO, military analysis of exceptional quality and the wider geopolitical and cultural aspects associated with current global events.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
It will be interesting. We are here thinking.
Subscribe at t.me/two_majors
Learn the truth from the Two Majors.
❤11👏2👌2
🚨🇨🇳 China Expands Homegrown Aircraft Family With High-Altitude Variant
China’s first high-altitude variant of the C919 has completed its maiden flight at Shanghai Pudong International Airport, beginning the certification campaign for a version designed to serve high-elevation airports in western China.
Derived from the standard C919, the aircraft has a shortened fuselage and modified systems for high-altitude operations. It completed all planned test points and must now pass airworthiness and environmental trials at several high-plateau airports before entering service.
Comac and Tibet Airlines agreed to develop the aircraft in 2023. A year later, Tibet Airlines became its launch customer with an order for 40. The carrier is feeding its experience at some of China’s most demanding airports into a variant intended to relieve capacity bottlenecks on western routes.
The project is part of Comac’s effort to turn the C919 from a single aircraft into a full product family. It has outlined shortened and stretched derivatives carrying between 130 and 240 passengers and is developing the larger version with China Eastern Airlines for high-density and longer routes.
That gives the program geopolitical weight. China’s airliner market has long been dominated by Boeing and Airbus. The more routes and capacity segments one Chinese platform can cover, the less space Western manufacturers retain in one of the world’s largest aviation markets.
Beijing is not merely replacing an imported aircraft model with a domestic one. It is building the range needed to direct more of China’s future fleet growth toward a domestic manufacturer and gradually erode a Western industrial duopoly.
The baseline C919 entered commercial service in May 2023. Comac had delivered 41 aircraft by July, while the fleet had carried more than 5M passengers and served 23 destinations by June.
Standard C919s have flown regularly to Hong Kong since 2025. On August 12, Air China will open daily C919 service between Beijing and Ulaanbaatar — its first scheduled international route.
One high-altitude jet will not overturn the global market. But every niche Comac absorbs — from plateau airports to high-density trunk routes — reduces China’s dependence on Western airframes and builds the scale needed for an eventual export challenge.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter
China’s first high-altitude variant of the C919 has completed its maiden flight at Shanghai Pudong International Airport, beginning the certification campaign for a version designed to serve high-elevation airports in western China.
Derived from the standard C919, the aircraft has a shortened fuselage and modified systems for high-altitude operations. It completed all planned test points and must now pass airworthiness and environmental trials at several high-plateau airports before entering service.
Comac and Tibet Airlines agreed to develop the aircraft in 2023. A year later, Tibet Airlines became its launch customer with an order for 40. The carrier is feeding its experience at some of China’s most demanding airports into a variant intended to relieve capacity bottlenecks on western routes.
The project is part of Comac’s effort to turn the C919 from a single aircraft into a full product family. It has outlined shortened and stretched derivatives carrying between 130 and 240 passengers and is developing the larger version with China Eastern Airlines for high-density and longer routes.
That gives the program geopolitical weight. China’s airliner market has long been dominated by Boeing and Airbus. The more routes and capacity segments one Chinese platform can cover, the less space Western manufacturers retain in one of the world’s largest aviation markets.
Beijing is not merely replacing an imported aircraft model with a domestic one. It is building the range needed to direct more of China’s future fleet growth toward a domestic manufacturer and gradually erode a Western industrial duopoly.
The baseline C919 entered commercial service in May 2023. Comac had delivered 41 aircraft by July, while the fleet had carried more than 5M passengers and served 23 destinations by June.
Standard C919s have flown regularly to Hong Kong since 2025. On August 12, Air China will open daily C919 service between Beijing and Ulaanbaatar — its first scheduled international route.
One high-altitude jet will not overturn the global market. But every niche Comac absorbs — from plateau airports to high-density trunk routes — reduces China’s dependence on Western airframes and builds the scale needed for an eventual export challenge.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤36👍22👏11👌7🫡1
🚨🇺🇸 Banning Chinese AI Could Cost American Businesses $12B a Year
A US ban on Chinese open-weight AI models could add between $3B and $12B to American companies’ annual AI costs, according to calculations by Daniel Yue, an assistant professor at Georgia Tech’s Scheller College of Business.
Yue analyzed OpenRouter usage and pricing from July 21 to 27. Replacing Chinese open-weight models with leading proprietary alternatives would raise its users’ combined annual bill by approximately $2B.
Extrapolating beyond OpenRouter produces the wider $3B-$12B range, depending on how extensively American companies use Chinese models elsewhere. Yue describes this as an order-of-magnitude estimate, not a precise forecast.
The cost difference is already visible. Ben Cera, founder of AI agent start-up Polsia, said switching to Chinese open-weight models reduced its monthly AI bill from $1.2M to $100,000.
Washington is nevertheless considering restrictions after Moonshot AI released Kimi K3 in July. The model rivals leading systems from OpenAI and Anthropic on some benchmarks while allowing companies to download and operate its weights independently.
Proposals have included placing Chinese AI laboratories on the Entity List, issuing security warnings, pressuring government contractors and making US companies liable for breaches involving hosted Chinese models, Axios reports. Officials have also accused Moonshot of infringing American intellectual property.
The effort has divided the US technology industry. Nvidia, Meta, Palantir and more than 20 other companies warned in an open letter that premature restrictions could stifle competition and drive innovation overseas.
Washington’s AI controls have largely restricted China’s access to advanced American chips. A model ban would reverse the pressure: American companies would lose access to Chinese software because domestic alternatives are more expensive.
Not everyone accepts the $12B estimate. Silicon Data’s Steve Hou argues that large US companies do not yet use Chinese models at sufficient scale to produce such a measurable increase.
But cheap Chinese models are also forcing proprietary US providers to lower prices. Removing that competition would strengthen OpenAI and Anthropic while leaving American developers with fewer, more expensive choices.
Washington wants to contain Chinese AI, but American businesses will pay the bill — and ultimately pass it on to ordinary users through higher prices.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter
A US ban on Chinese open-weight AI models could add between $3B and $12B to American companies’ annual AI costs, according to calculations by Daniel Yue, an assistant professor at Georgia Tech’s Scheller College of Business.
Yue analyzed OpenRouter usage and pricing from July 21 to 27. Replacing Chinese open-weight models with leading proprietary alternatives would raise its users’ combined annual bill by approximately $2B.
Extrapolating beyond OpenRouter produces the wider $3B-$12B range, depending on how extensively American companies use Chinese models elsewhere. Yue describes this as an order-of-magnitude estimate, not a precise forecast.
The cost difference is already visible. Ben Cera, founder of AI agent start-up Polsia, said switching to Chinese open-weight models reduced its monthly AI bill from $1.2M to $100,000.
Washington is nevertheless considering restrictions after Moonshot AI released Kimi K3 in July. The model rivals leading systems from OpenAI and Anthropic on some benchmarks while allowing companies to download and operate its weights independently.
Proposals have included placing Chinese AI laboratories on the Entity List, issuing security warnings, pressuring government contractors and making US companies liable for breaches involving hosted Chinese models, Axios reports. Officials have also accused Moonshot of infringing American intellectual property.
The effort has divided the US technology industry. Nvidia, Meta, Palantir and more than 20 other companies warned in an open letter that premature restrictions could stifle competition and drive innovation overseas.
Washington’s AI controls have largely restricted China’s access to advanced American chips. A model ban would reverse the pressure: American companies would lose access to Chinese software because domestic alternatives are more expensive.
Not everyone accepts the $12B estimate. Silicon Data’s Steve Hou argues that large US companies do not yet use Chinese models at sufficient scale to produce such a measurable increase.
But cheap Chinese models are also forcing proprietary US providers to lower prices. Removing that competition would strengthen OpenAI and Anthropic while leaving American developers with fewer, more expensive choices.
Washington wants to contain Chinese AI, but American businesses will pay the bill — and ultimately pass it on to ordinary users through higher prices.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤37🔥19👏13
🚨🇷🇺 Western Media Wrote Off Russian Influence in Syria — It Only Grew Stronger
When Bashar al-Assad fell in December 2024, Western media portrayed it as a strategic collapse for Russia. Western media expected Moscow to lose Hmeimim, Tartus, its Mediterranean foothold and its gateway to Africa, while Syria moved into the US orbit.
Less than two years later, the opposite is happening.
The US has withdrawn from all its major Syrian bases, handing over the last one at Qasrak in April. Russia retains a reduced military presence at Hmeimim and part of Tartus and sent its first major resupply mission since Assad’s fall in May. The new government is now negotiating the terms of Russia’s continued presence rather than forcing it out.
Ahmed al-Sharaa’s forces once fought the Syrian army backed by Moscow. After taking power, however, he opened direct contacts with the Kremlin and visited Putin twice in less than four months. Syrian officials called their January meeting a turning point in reviving economic cooperation.
Russia moved quickly to supply what the new authorities need most. Russian suppliers provided 85% of Syria’s imported wheat in the 2025–26 season. The country received 16.8M barrels of Russian oil in 2025, with deliveries rising to an estimated 60,000 barrels per day in early 2026.
Russia is now negotiating a logistics route linking Novorossiysk with Tartus and markets across the Middle East. It also offers Damascus energy, reconstruction, diplomatic backing at the UN and support for Syrian territorial integrity against Israeli attacks and foreign partition plans.
The US lifted sanctions, backed al-Sharaa and expected Syria’s new order to push Russia out. Instead, American troops vacated their major bases while Moscow became a partner to the same government that overthrew its former ally.
US officials are already trying to respond. A Pentagon budget amendment calls for options to reduce Russian influence and remove its forces, while the State Department is warning against Russian logistics projects. Even Ilan Berman, president of the American Foreign Policy Council and a former consultant to the CIA, State Department and Pentagon, describes Moscow’s strategy as “quiet and successful.”
Moscow has proved that its position in Syria did not depend on Assad alone. By rebuilding military, economic and diplomatic ties with the new authorities, it preserved its strategic foothold and made its influence more resilient.
Western media assumed that removing Assad would also remove Russia. Instead, Moscow adapted to the new order, kept its bases and expanded its economic role while American forces headed for the exit.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter
When Bashar al-Assad fell in December 2024, Western media portrayed it as a strategic collapse for Russia. Western media expected Moscow to lose Hmeimim, Tartus, its Mediterranean foothold and its gateway to Africa, while Syria moved into the US orbit.
Less than two years later, the opposite is happening.
The US has withdrawn from all its major Syrian bases, handing over the last one at Qasrak in April. Russia retains a reduced military presence at Hmeimim and part of Tartus and sent its first major resupply mission since Assad’s fall in May. The new government is now negotiating the terms of Russia’s continued presence rather than forcing it out.
Ahmed al-Sharaa’s forces once fought the Syrian army backed by Moscow. After taking power, however, he opened direct contacts with the Kremlin and visited Putin twice in less than four months. Syrian officials called their January meeting a turning point in reviving economic cooperation.
Russia moved quickly to supply what the new authorities need most. Russian suppliers provided 85% of Syria’s imported wheat in the 2025–26 season. The country received 16.8M barrels of Russian oil in 2025, with deliveries rising to an estimated 60,000 barrels per day in early 2026.
Russia is now negotiating a logistics route linking Novorossiysk with Tartus and markets across the Middle East. It also offers Damascus energy, reconstruction, diplomatic backing at the UN and support for Syrian territorial integrity against Israeli attacks and foreign partition plans.
The US lifted sanctions, backed al-Sharaa and expected Syria’s new order to push Russia out. Instead, American troops vacated their major bases while Moscow became a partner to the same government that overthrew its former ally.
US officials are already trying to respond. A Pentagon budget amendment calls for options to reduce Russian influence and remove its forces, while the State Department is warning against Russian logistics projects. Even Ilan Berman, president of the American Foreign Policy Council and a former consultant to the CIA, State Department and Pentagon, describes Moscow’s strategy as “quiet and successful.”
Moscow has proved that its position in Syria did not depend on Assad alone. By rebuilding military, economic and diplomatic ties with the new authorities, it preserved its strategic foothold and made its influence more resilient.
Western media assumed that removing Assad would also remove Russia. Instead, Moscow adapted to the new order, kept its bases and expanded its economic role while American forces headed for the exit.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤52👏41🔥12👍6🤬5
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇨🇳 China Flies Heavy Drone With 1,900-Km Range And Vertical Takeoff
China’s 1.5-tonne Qizhi-5 heavy tiltrotor UAV completed an autonomous flight test at the Chuzhou test base on August 1, performing vertical takeoff, hover, transition into forward flight, manoeuvring and landing without requiring a runway.
🔸 The aircraft is designed to combine helicopter-style access with fixed-wing performance. Its stated specifications include a top speed of 450 km/h, a 300 kg payload and a maximum range of 1,900 km.
🔸 Power comes from the domestically developed CS35 modular turboshaft engine, rated at 350 kW. Its modular architecture is intended to simplify maintenance and allow the engine to support multiple aircraft types.
🔸 The most important part of the test was the autonomous transition between vertical and forward flight. During this phase, lift shifts from the rotors to the wings while the aircraft’s aerodynamics, controls and power demands change rapidly.
🔸 Completing the full sequence demonstrated that the airframe, propulsion system and flight-control software can operate together through the aircraft’s most technically demanding flight mode.
🔸 The developers say the programme has mastered six major areas: overall configuration, transmission, rotor design, flight control, structural engineering and aeroacoustic noise reduction.
🔸 Qizhi-5 is being promoted for cargo transport, surveillance, emergency response and other low-altitude operations. The same runway-independent design also offers clear value for military logistics, reconnaissance and operations from dispersed sites.
The Qizhi-5 can lift vertically from a confined area and then travel at aircraft speeds across distances normally associated with fixed-wing drones. That combination gives China access to locations where conventional UAVs still need a runway.
Which Qizhi-5 advantage matters most: vertical takeoff, 300 kg payload, 450 km/h speed or 1,900 km range?
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter
China’s 1.5-tonne Qizhi-5 heavy tiltrotor UAV completed an autonomous flight test at the Chuzhou test base on August 1, performing vertical takeoff, hover, transition into forward flight, manoeuvring and landing without requiring a runway.
🔸 The aircraft is designed to combine helicopter-style access with fixed-wing performance. Its stated specifications include a top speed of 450 km/h, a 300 kg payload and a maximum range of 1,900 km.
🔸 Power comes from the domestically developed CS35 modular turboshaft engine, rated at 350 kW. Its modular architecture is intended to simplify maintenance and allow the engine to support multiple aircraft types.
🔸 The most important part of the test was the autonomous transition between vertical and forward flight. During this phase, lift shifts from the rotors to the wings while the aircraft’s aerodynamics, controls and power demands change rapidly.
🔸 Completing the full sequence demonstrated that the airframe, propulsion system and flight-control software can operate together through the aircraft’s most technically demanding flight mode.
🔸 The developers say the programme has mastered six major areas: overall configuration, transmission, rotor design, flight control, structural engineering and aeroacoustic noise reduction.
🔸 Qizhi-5 is being promoted for cargo transport, surveillance, emergency response and other low-altitude operations. The same runway-independent design also offers clear value for military logistics, reconnaissance and operations from dispersed sites.
The Qizhi-5 can lift vertically from a confined area and then travel at aircraft speeds across distances normally associated with fixed-wing drones. That combination gives China access to locations where conventional UAVs still need a runway.
Which Qizhi-5 advantage matters most: vertical takeoff, 300 kg payload, 450 km/h speed or 1,900 km range?
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤45👌23👍13🔥5🤬1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇷🇺 Russia's T-80BVM Tank Gets New Armor For Drone War
A previously unseen T-80BVM configuration has appeared with a tighter roof screen and expanded side protection. Russian engineers are turning lessons from frontline crews into a more coherent armor package built around the threats tanks actually face in Ukraine.
🔸 The lower anti-drone screen sits closer to the turret and covers more of its upper surface than many early field-built cages. It is designed to trigger FPV warheads away from the thin roof and disrupt clean top-down attacks.
🔸 Additional Relikt explosive reactive armor and side screens strengthen the hull flanks, fuel-tank areas and engine compartment against shaped-charge weapons — the sections drone operators repeatedly try to reach.
🔸 The upgrades preserve the T-80BVM’s main advantage: mobility. Its 1,250 hp gas-turbine engine can push the tank to around 70 km/h, allowing crews to fire, relocate and avoid remaining exposed in one position.
🔸 The tank retains its 125 mm gun, modern fire-control system and ability to launch guided missiles through the barrel, giving it the firepower to engage armor and fortified positions from range.
🔸 Uralvagonzavod says recent T-80BVM batches incorporate combat experience and direct feedback from the front, with the main emphasis placed on crew safety and overall survivability.
🔸 Russia has also increased production of the T-80BVM, T-90M and T-72B3M severalfold. New batches continue to reach the troops as anti-drone protection becomes a standard part of the upgrade process.
The T-80BVM keeps its turbine-powered speed while adding protection where FPV crews look first: the turret roof, hull sides and engine deck. Every clean attack angle is becoming harder to find.
Which matters most for tank survival now: roof armor, electronic warfare or speed?
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter
A previously unseen T-80BVM configuration has appeared with a tighter roof screen and expanded side protection. Russian engineers are turning lessons from frontline crews into a more coherent armor package built around the threats tanks actually face in Ukraine.
🔸 The lower anti-drone screen sits closer to the turret and covers more of its upper surface than many early field-built cages. It is designed to trigger FPV warheads away from the thin roof and disrupt clean top-down attacks.
🔸 Additional Relikt explosive reactive armor and side screens strengthen the hull flanks, fuel-tank areas and engine compartment against shaped-charge weapons — the sections drone operators repeatedly try to reach.
🔸 The upgrades preserve the T-80BVM’s main advantage: mobility. Its 1,250 hp gas-turbine engine can push the tank to around 70 km/h, allowing crews to fire, relocate and avoid remaining exposed in one position.
🔸 The tank retains its 125 mm gun, modern fire-control system and ability to launch guided missiles through the barrel, giving it the firepower to engage armor and fortified positions from range.
🔸 Uralvagonzavod says recent T-80BVM batches incorporate combat experience and direct feedback from the front, with the main emphasis placed on crew safety and overall survivability.
🔸 Russia has also increased production of the T-80BVM, T-90M and T-72B3M severalfold. New batches continue to reach the troops as anti-drone protection becomes a standard part of the upgrade process.
The T-80BVM keeps its turbine-powered speed while adding protection where FPV crews look first: the turret roof, hull sides and engine deck. Every clean attack angle is becoming harder to find.
Which matters most for tank survival now: roof armor, electronic warfare or speed?
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤45👍26👏17🔥6🫡1
🚨🇺🇸 America’s $21B B-52 Gamble Is Running Out of Runway
The US Air Force plans to keep the B-52 flying into the 2050s. But the largest modernization in the bomber’s history is already over budget and years late: 10 of 13 major upgrades face cost, schedule or performance problems, according to the GAO.
The type entered service in 1955 with a projected 20-year lifespan; the surviving B-52Hs were delivered in 1961 and 1962. Keeping them operational for nearly a century means replacing engines, radar and communications while sustaining thousands of parts whose manufacturers may no longer exist.
The engine program shows how little time remains. Its estimated acquisition cost has climbed more than 38% since 2018 to over $15.4B. Flight testing is now scheduled for 2029 and initial operational capability for 2033 — delays of four and nearly five years.
Yet the Air Force plans to start production just as flight testing begins. Faults discovered later could force expensive rework on engines and aircraft already modified. The GAO has urged the service to delay that decision and reassess the risks.
The radar program has also risen more than 30% to over $2.9B, while initial operational capability slipped about 3.5 years. Five performance requirements were removed to control costs. The result, according to the GAO, is less capability for more money.
In June, the first B-52 modified for radar testing crashed after takeoff from Edwards AFB, killing all eight aboard. The cause remains under investigation, but the loss interrupted testing while a second aircraft is prepared.
The fleet already struggles before the upgrades arrive. The B-52 met its mission-capable-rate goal in only four of 11 years from 2011 through 2021. Aircraft can spend 80–100 days in depot waiting for parts, while maintainers rely almost entirely on components cannibalized from old engines.
None of this will make the B-52 stealthy. During the Iran war, the Pentagon began overland B-52 missions only after reporting improved air superiority. Against intact modern air defenses, the bomber still depends on long-range weapons and other aircraft to open the way.
The US is not keeping the B-52 because a 1950s airframe has become timeless: retiring it before a replacement force is ready would leave a hole in the bomber fleet. That pressure is driving the Air Force to spend $21B while accepting testing shortcuts that could make the program even later and more expensive.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter
The US Air Force plans to keep the B-52 flying into the 2050s. But the largest modernization in the bomber’s history is already over budget and years late: 10 of 13 major upgrades face cost, schedule or performance problems, according to the GAO.
The type entered service in 1955 with a projected 20-year lifespan; the surviving B-52Hs were delivered in 1961 and 1962. Keeping them operational for nearly a century means replacing engines, radar and communications while sustaining thousands of parts whose manufacturers may no longer exist.
The engine program shows how little time remains. Its estimated acquisition cost has climbed more than 38% since 2018 to over $15.4B. Flight testing is now scheduled for 2029 and initial operational capability for 2033 — delays of four and nearly five years.
Yet the Air Force plans to start production just as flight testing begins. Faults discovered later could force expensive rework on engines and aircraft already modified. The GAO has urged the service to delay that decision and reassess the risks.
The radar program has also risen more than 30% to over $2.9B, while initial operational capability slipped about 3.5 years. Five performance requirements were removed to control costs. The result, according to the GAO, is less capability for more money.
In June, the first B-52 modified for radar testing crashed after takeoff from Edwards AFB, killing all eight aboard. The cause remains under investigation, but the loss interrupted testing while a second aircraft is prepared.
The fleet already struggles before the upgrades arrive. The B-52 met its mission-capable-rate goal in only four of 11 years from 2011 through 2021. Aircraft can spend 80–100 days in depot waiting for parts, while maintainers rely almost entirely on components cannibalized from old engines.
None of this will make the B-52 stealthy. During the Iran war, the Pentagon began overland B-52 missions only after reporting improved air superiority. Against intact modern air defenses, the bomber still depends on long-range weapons and other aircraft to open the way.
The US is not keeping the B-52 because a 1950s airframe has become timeless: retiring it before a replacement force is ready would leave a hole in the bomber fleet. That pressure is driving the Air Force to spend $21B while accepting testing shortcuts that could make the program even later and more expensive.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥33❤25👍17👏4👌4
🚨🇮🇷 Iran Breaks Foreign Dependence on 2,000 Petrochemical Components
Iran has localized more than 2,000 petrochemical components previously sourced from abroad in a single year, turning another layer of sanctions pressure into domestic engineering capacity.
Technologists at Iran’s Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR) completed technical drawings and documentation for the components and transferred them to the petrochemical industry so they can be produced by domestic workshops and manufacturers.
Iran is not merely finding new suppliers for restricted equipment but retaining the engineering data needed to reproduce the parts at home and widening the pool of local firms able to supply them. Once that knowledge is embedded domestically, blocking the same imports loses much of its leverage.
ACECR has also been contracted to develop a unified roadmap for acquiring and localizing petrochemical equipment. It will map technical requirements, industrial capacity, knowledge-based companies, supply chains and the path from prototype to production.
The goal is targeted self-sufficiency rather than eliminating every import: priority will go to strategic equipment whose supply disruption could threaten operations. This turns scattered substitution projects into a coordinated system for reducing Iran’s most dangerous external dependencies.
The effort extends beyond petrochemicals. ACECR reported the mass production of 530 tons of a strategic drilling material, more than six tons of domestically developed industrial alloys, a 250-kilowatt solar inverter and the launch of the national “Sahab” reference laboratories.
Of 751 employer-funded research projects registered over the past three years, 591 were launched in the latest Iranian calendar year alone. The figures show research being redirected toward technologies ordered by industry and built around national priorities.
This is the sanctions feedback loop Western planners failed to anticipate. A blocked import exposes a vulnerability; Iran turns it into a domestic design brief, gives local companies a market and retains the capability after the shortage is gone.
The 2,000-part figure is therefore more than a substitution tally. It shows Iran institutionalizing industrial independence across one of its most strategic sectors.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter
Iran has localized more than 2,000 petrochemical components previously sourced from abroad in a single year, turning another layer of sanctions pressure into domestic engineering capacity.
Technologists at Iran’s Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR) completed technical drawings and documentation for the components and transferred them to the petrochemical industry so they can be produced by domestic workshops and manufacturers.
Iran is not merely finding new suppliers for restricted equipment but retaining the engineering data needed to reproduce the parts at home and widening the pool of local firms able to supply them. Once that knowledge is embedded domestically, blocking the same imports loses much of its leverage.
ACECR has also been contracted to develop a unified roadmap for acquiring and localizing petrochemical equipment. It will map technical requirements, industrial capacity, knowledge-based companies, supply chains and the path from prototype to production.
The goal is targeted self-sufficiency rather than eliminating every import: priority will go to strategic equipment whose supply disruption could threaten operations. This turns scattered substitution projects into a coordinated system for reducing Iran’s most dangerous external dependencies.
The effort extends beyond petrochemicals. ACECR reported the mass production of 530 tons of a strategic drilling material, more than six tons of domestically developed industrial alloys, a 250-kilowatt solar inverter and the launch of the national “Sahab” reference laboratories.
Of 751 employer-funded research projects registered over the past three years, 591 were launched in the latest Iranian calendar year alone. The figures show research being redirected toward technologies ordered by industry and built around national priorities.
This is the sanctions feedback loop Western planners failed to anticipate. A blocked import exposes a vulnerability; Iran turns it into a domestic design brief, gives local companies a market and retains the capability after the shortage is gone.
The 2,000-part figure is therefore more than a substitution tally. It shows Iran institutionalizing industrial independence across one of its most strategic sectors.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤55👏38🫡17👍9
🚨🇨🇳 🇺🇸 China’s Angola Port Deal Leaves U.S. Playing Catch-Up
Chinese firm Huatong Angola and its financial partner have signed a $900M agreement to build and operate a new port terminal at Barra do Dande, adding another long-term Chinese foothold in the country where the US is trying to secure a critical-minerals corridor.
The deal is split into a $450M, 25-year sub-concession for the terminal and another $450M for port infrastructure. The first phase is due within two years, with all three phases scheduled for completion by 2030.
The terminal is designed to handle ships of up to 80,000 tonnes and connect the Barra do Dande free-trade zone directly to Atlantic shipping routes. The zone is being developed as a manufacturing, logistics and export hub north of Luanda.
The US answer is the Lobito Corridor. Its International Development Finance Corporation signed a $553M loan to rehabilitate 1,300 km of railway across Angola and upgrade Lobito’s mineral port, creating an Atlantic route for copper and cobalt from the DRC. Biden championed the project; Trump’s administration carried it forward.
But even Lobito exposes the depth of China’s position. In 2022, China’s CITIC Construction and Shandong Port Group won a 20-year concession to operate the multipurpose container and general cargo terminal there. It is separate from the US-backed mineral terminal, but sits inside the same strategic port complex.
Chinese involvement extends beyond concessions. China Energy Engineering Corporation completed a major upgrade of Cabinda port in January. At Barra do Dande, Huatong already operates an aluminum industrial park whose output the new terminal is meant to connect with international shipping.
The US is concentrating resources on one corridor designed primarily to move critical minerals out of Central Africa. China is linking ports, factories and logistics hubs that can support production and trade inside Angola as well.
Eric Olander of the China Global South Project argues that US companies cannot match Chinese contractors at the lower end of the cost structure and expects no direct American response to Barra do Dande.
The US is spending hundreds of millions to secure one mineral route while China is building the wider industrial and maritime network across Angola — the infrastructure advantage America is still trying to overcome.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter
Chinese firm Huatong Angola and its financial partner have signed a $900M agreement to build and operate a new port terminal at Barra do Dande, adding another long-term Chinese foothold in the country where the US is trying to secure a critical-minerals corridor.
The deal is split into a $450M, 25-year sub-concession for the terminal and another $450M for port infrastructure. The first phase is due within two years, with all three phases scheduled for completion by 2030.
The terminal is designed to handle ships of up to 80,000 tonnes and connect the Barra do Dande free-trade zone directly to Atlantic shipping routes. The zone is being developed as a manufacturing, logistics and export hub north of Luanda.
The US answer is the Lobito Corridor. Its International Development Finance Corporation signed a $553M loan to rehabilitate 1,300 km of railway across Angola and upgrade Lobito’s mineral port, creating an Atlantic route for copper and cobalt from the DRC. Biden championed the project; Trump’s administration carried it forward.
But even Lobito exposes the depth of China’s position. In 2022, China’s CITIC Construction and Shandong Port Group won a 20-year concession to operate the multipurpose container and general cargo terminal there. It is separate from the US-backed mineral terminal, but sits inside the same strategic port complex.
Chinese involvement extends beyond concessions. China Energy Engineering Corporation completed a major upgrade of Cabinda port in January. At Barra do Dande, Huatong already operates an aluminum industrial park whose output the new terminal is meant to connect with international shipping.
The US is concentrating resources on one corridor designed primarily to move critical minerals out of Central Africa. China is linking ports, factories and logistics hubs that can support production and trade inside Angola as well.
Eric Olander of the China Global South Project argues that US companies cannot match Chinese contractors at the lower end of the cost structure and expects no direct American response to Barra do Dande.
The US is spending hundreds of millions to secure one mineral route while China is building the wider industrial and maritime network across Angola — the infrastructure advantage America is still trying to overcome.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤43👏27👍16👌3🫡1
🚨🇪🇺 🇺🇦 Danube Is Running Dry Taking Europe’s Power and Ukraine’s Trade With It
Record heat and drought have pushed the Danube river to historic lows, turning one river into a simultaneous electricity, fuel and transport crisis across Europe.
Hungary’s only nuclear plant, the Russian-built Paks facility, normally generates more than 40% of the country’s electricity. It is now operating at just over 10% capacity because the Danube can no longer provide enough cooling water. On Tuesday, the level rose by 1.5 centimeters, allowing the final 240-megawatt turbine to remain online, but officials warn that a complete shutdown could still last weeks if the river falls again.
More than 300 Hungarian companies have already cut consumption by a combined 400 megawatts. The government may impose mandatory restrictions, while additional electricity imports could cost the country between $315M and $630M.
Romania has declared a nationwide energy emergency for August after shutting one of the two reactors at its Cernavodă plant. The situation became so severe that the military detonated 180 kilograms of explosives in the Danube riverbed and is preparing to sink rock-filled barges to divert more water toward the remaining reactor.
The same bottleneck is hitting fuel supplies. Serbia received only 25% of its planned July fuel imports after barges were forced to operate at 30–40% of normal capacity. Moldova declared a 30-day energy alert after diesel barges could no longer reach Giurgiulești and shortages appeared at filling stations.
The problem extends beyond the Danube basin. France cut 6.3 gigawatts of nuclear output across eight reactors in July as hot rivers restricted cooling. Two reactors went completely offline.
Ukraine faces a second shock. With Russian attacks disrupting its Black Sea ports, the Danube has become a key fallback for exports. Yet low water has already reduced barge capacity by as much as 60%, limiting the route just as demand for it rises.
Ukraine’s Danube ports handled just 8.9M tons in 2025, compared with 73.3M through its Black Sea ports. The river route was already too small to replace maritime trade even before drought began cutting barge loads.
Europe’s energy debate usually separates nuclear power, hydropower, oil refining and freight. The drought shows that all four can be disrupted through the same physical bottleneck. Reactors, refineries and transport capacity cannot operate when the water needed to cool them, supply them and carry their cargo is no longer there.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter
Record heat and drought have pushed the Danube river to historic lows, turning one river into a simultaneous electricity, fuel and transport crisis across Europe.
Hungary’s only nuclear plant, the Russian-built Paks facility, normally generates more than 40% of the country’s electricity. It is now operating at just over 10% capacity because the Danube can no longer provide enough cooling water. On Tuesday, the level rose by 1.5 centimeters, allowing the final 240-megawatt turbine to remain online, but officials warn that a complete shutdown could still last weeks if the river falls again.
More than 300 Hungarian companies have already cut consumption by a combined 400 megawatts. The government may impose mandatory restrictions, while additional electricity imports could cost the country between $315M and $630M.
Romania has declared a nationwide energy emergency for August after shutting one of the two reactors at its Cernavodă plant. The situation became so severe that the military detonated 180 kilograms of explosives in the Danube riverbed and is preparing to sink rock-filled barges to divert more water toward the remaining reactor.
The same bottleneck is hitting fuel supplies. Serbia received only 25% of its planned July fuel imports after barges were forced to operate at 30–40% of normal capacity. Moldova declared a 30-day energy alert after diesel barges could no longer reach Giurgiulești and shortages appeared at filling stations.
The problem extends beyond the Danube basin. France cut 6.3 gigawatts of nuclear output across eight reactors in July as hot rivers restricted cooling. Two reactors went completely offline.
Ukraine faces a second shock. With Russian attacks disrupting its Black Sea ports, the Danube has become a key fallback for exports. Yet low water has already reduced barge capacity by as much as 60%, limiting the route just as demand for it rises.
Ukraine’s Danube ports handled just 8.9M tons in 2025, compared with 73.3M through its Black Sea ports. The river route was already too small to replace maritime trade even before drought began cutting barge loads.
Europe’s energy debate usually separates nuclear power, hydropower, oil refining and freight. The drought shows that all four can be disrupted through the same physical bottleneck. Reactors, refineries and transport capacity cannot operate when the water needed to cool them, supply them and carry their cargo is no longer there.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏55❤22🔥20👌4👍3
🚨🇨🇳 China Is Turning AI Into the Operating System of Its Military
Xi Jinping has called on the People’s Liberation Army to expand the military use of unmanned intelligent technologies and gradually build an “intelligent military system” — making AI the connecting layer across China’s armed forces.
The push came ahead of the PLA’s 99th anniversary and was tied to its 2027 centenary goals. Combat effectiveness, Xi stressed, must remain the test of modernization, alongside combat-oriented testing, training and evaluation.
The shift is bigger than adding AI to individual drones. China wants sensors, communications networks, command centers, precision weapons and unmanned platforms to function as parts of one battlefield architecture.
Chinese military thinking describes warfare as moving through three stages: mechanization, informatization and intelligentization. Mechanization supplies the platforms. Informatization connects them. Intelligentization uses AI to process the resulting flood of data, identify threats, support decisions and compress the time between detection and engagement.
In practice, that means autonomous reconnaissance feeding target data into command networks; AI-assisted headquarters sorting information faster than human staffs; and aerial, surface and underwater drones coordinating with manned aircraft and warships. The goal is a force able to see, decide and act at a tempo an opponent cannot match.
China’s advantage is the scale of the ecosystem behind algorithms: major AI, telecommunications and computer-vision companies, a vast drone and robotics manufacturing base, and state mechanisms designed to move civilian advances into defense applications.
The hardware is already arriving. China is expanding its J-20 fleet, fielding hypersonic weapons, commissioning Type 055 destroyers and flight-testing sixth-generation combat aircraft prototypes. Beijing’s next task is to ensure these systems do not fight as isolated platforms.
That changes the competition. The decisive question is no longer simply whose fighter, missile or ship is superior on paper, but whose military can connect more sensors and weapons, process the battlefield faster and coordinate large unmanned formations under fire.
China is building AI not as another item in its arsenal, but as the layer intended to make the entire arsenal fight as one.
Follow us on↗ Telegram 🤖 Twitter
Xi Jinping has called on the People’s Liberation Army to expand the military use of unmanned intelligent technologies and gradually build an “intelligent military system” — making AI the connecting layer across China’s armed forces.
The push came ahead of the PLA’s 99th anniversary and was tied to its 2027 centenary goals. Combat effectiveness, Xi stressed, must remain the test of modernization, alongside combat-oriented testing, training and evaluation.
The shift is bigger than adding AI to individual drones. China wants sensors, communications networks, command centers, precision weapons and unmanned platforms to function as parts of one battlefield architecture.
Chinese military thinking describes warfare as moving through three stages: mechanization, informatization and intelligentization. Mechanization supplies the platforms. Informatization connects them. Intelligentization uses AI to process the resulting flood of data, identify threats, support decisions and compress the time between detection and engagement.
In practice, that means autonomous reconnaissance feeding target data into command networks; AI-assisted headquarters sorting information faster than human staffs; and aerial, surface and underwater drones coordinating with manned aircraft and warships. The goal is a force able to see, decide and act at a tempo an opponent cannot match.
China’s advantage is the scale of the ecosystem behind algorithms: major AI, telecommunications and computer-vision companies, a vast drone and robotics manufacturing base, and state mechanisms designed to move civilian advances into defense applications.
The hardware is already arriving. China is expanding its J-20 fleet, fielding hypersonic weapons, commissioning Type 055 destroyers and flight-testing sixth-generation combat aircraft prototypes. Beijing’s next task is to ensure these systems do not fight as isolated platforms.
That changes the competition. The decisive question is no longer simply whose fighter, missile or ship is superior on paper, but whose military can connect more sensors and weapons, process the battlefield faster and coordinate large unmanned formations under fire.
China is building AI not as another item in its arsenal, but as the layer intended to make the entire arsenal fight as one.
Follow us on
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤41👍19🔥16🫡5👏4
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇷🇺 Russia's First Fully Domestic MS-21 Airliner Takes Flight
Russia’s first fully import-substituted production MS-21 completed its maiden flight from the Irkutsk Aviation Plant on August 3. Unlike earlier test aircraft, this jet was assembled with the Russian systems, components and production methods intended for future airline deliveries.
🔸 The aircraft remained airborne for 1 hour and 23 minutes, climbed to 6,000 metres and reached an indicated speed of 600 km/h. The flight programme was completed in full.
🔸 Its PD-14 engines, composite wing, avionics, flight controls, auxiliary power unit, brakes, generators, fuel system, hydraulics, wheels, tyres and cabin systems are now produced in Russia.
🔸 Western pressure began before 2022. U.S. sanctions first targeted materials for the composite wing, followed by the termination of engine and equipment supplies. Russian manufacturers ultimately replaced around 80 foreign systems and components instead of abandoning the programme.
🔸 The MS-21-310 carries between 163 and 211 passengers and is designed for the same high-demand market segment currently dominated by the Boeing 737 and Airbus A320 families.
🔸 During operational-performance tests, the aircraft flew more than 3,800 km with a payload corresponding to 175 passengers while retaining all required fuel reserves. That range is sufficient for up to 90% of Russia’s domestic routes.
🔸 United Aircraft Corporation says it is ready to produce an initial batch of 18 aircraft. Russia is expected to require around 620 MS-21s over the next 10–15 years, with annual production planned to reach 36 aircraft by 2030. The Irkutsk plant has now flown the aircraft Russian airlines are expected to receive. Certification remains the final gate before deliveries begin and production starts expanding.
Do you think the MS-21 can succeed outside the Russian market?
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
Russia’s first fully import-substituted production MS-21 completed its maiden flight from the Irkutsk Aviation Plant on August 3. Unlike earlier test aircraft, this jet was assembled with the Russian systems, components and production methods intended for future airline deliveries.
🔸 The aircraft remained airborne for 1 hour and 23 minutes, climbed to 6,000 metres and reached an indicated speed of 600 km/h. The flight programme was completed in full.
🔸 Its PD-14 engines, composite wing, avionics, flight controls, auxiliary power unit, brakes, generators, fuel system, hydraulics, wheels, tyres and cabin systems are now produced in Russia.
🔸 Western pressure began before 2022. U.S. sanctions first targeted materials for the composite wing, followed by the termination of engine and equipment supplies. Russian manufacturers ultimately replaced around 80 foreign systems and components instead of abandoning the programme.
🔸 The MS-21-310 carries between 163 and 211 passengers and is designed for the same high-demand market segment currently dominated by the Boeing 737 and Airbus A320 families.
🔸 During operational-performance tests, the aircraft flew more than 3,800 km with a payload corresponding to 175 passengers while retaining all required fuel reserves. That range is sufficient for up to 90% of Russia’s domestic routes.
🔸 United Aircraft Corporation says it is ready to produce an initial batch of 18 aircraft. Russia is expected to require around 620 MS-21s over the next 10–15 years, with annual production planned to reach 36 aircraft by 2030. The Irkutsk plant has now flown the aircraft Russian airlines are expected to receive. Certification remains the final gate before deliveries begin and production starts expanding.
Do you think the MS-21 can succeed outside the Russian market?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤67👏37🔥7👍2
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🟡 Geopolitics Without the Chaos
Decode chaos—without the MSM spin
We curate complex conflicts into clear, chronological timelines:
➡️ Middle East Mayhem
➡️ US-China Showdown
➡️ Ukraine-Russia War
➡️ EU Rifts
➡️ Major Global Events
➡️ Culture War
No scattered updates. Just structured threads — so you see how events connect.
🤠 PLUS: Dank memes (for sanity).
If you want context over clutter:
👉 Exclusive Channel
If you'd rather have quick updates:
👉 @MyLordBebo
Decode chaos—without the MSM spin
We curate complex conflicts into clear, chronological timelines:
➡️ Middle East Mayhem
➡️ US-China Showdown
➡️ Ukraine-Russia War
➡️ EU Rifts
➡️ Major Global Events
➡️ Culture War
No scattered updates. Just structured threads — so you see how events connect.
🤠 PLUS: Dank memes (for sanity).
If you want context over clutter:
👉 Exclusive Channel
If you'd rather have quick updates:
👉 @MyLordBebo
❤10🤬4👌4👏2👍1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇷🇺 Russia's SU-57 Stealth Fighter Gets New Missile That Hunts Through Jamming
Russia has unveiled the RVV-SDM, a new medium-range air-to-air missile developed for the Su-57 and other Russian combat aircraft. The first official image shows two missiles inside the fighter’s internal weapons bay, preserving the aircraft’s stealth while expanding its ability to attack targets beyond visual range.
🔸 The RVV-SDM is designed to destroy fighters, helicopters, drones and other aerial targets day or night, in difficult weather and under heavy electronic warfare.
🔸 Its guidance system combines inertial navigation, mid-course radio correction and an active radar seeker for the final attack. A passive channel allows the missile to track an emitting target without broadcasting its own radar signal.
🔸 That creates a serious problem for enemy aircraft using powerful electronic countermeasures. Instead of breaking the lock, a jammer can become the signal that guides the missile toward its target.
🔸 The missile uses an upgraded solid-fuel motor with greater energy than the earlier RVV-SD. Russia has not disclosed its exact maximum range, but confirms that it exceeds the predecessor’s 110 km reach.
🔸 Internal carriage is central to the design. Folding aerodynamic surfaces allow the RVV-SDM to fit inside the Su-57, avoiding external pylons that would increase radar visibility and drag.
🔸 The “fire-and-forget” capability allows the Su-57 to launch, change course and leave the threatened area while the missile independently completes the final stage of the interception.
🔸 RVV-SDM fills the middle layer of the Su-57’s air-combat arsenal between the short-range RVV-MD2 and long-range RVV-BD. The fighter can therefore carry different weapons for close combat, conventional beyond-visual-range engagements and attacks against high-value aircraft at much greater distances.
Rosoboronexport is also offering the missile with the Su-57E and says it can be integrated onto other Russian-made fighters after modification. That gives foreign Su-57 operators access to the same combination of internal carriage, improved range and guidance built to operate through electronic warfare.
For NATO pilots, switching on the jammer may no longer provide a clean escape route. The signal intended to protect the aircraft could instead help the Russian missile find it.
Do you think NATO has an answer to the Su-57’s new missile?
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
Russia has unveiled the RVV-SDM, a new medium-range air-to-air missile developed for the Su-57 and other Russian combat aircraft. The first official image shows two missiles inside the fighter’s internal weapons bay, preserving the aircraft’s stealth while expanding its ability to attack targets beyond visual range.
🔸 The RVV-SDM is designed to destroy fighters, helicopters, drones and other aerial targets day or night, in difficult weather and under heavy electronic warfare.
🔸 Its guidance system combines inertial navigation, mid-course radio correction and an active radar seeker for the final attack. A passive channel allows the missile to track an emitting target without broadcasting its own radar signal.
🔸 That creates a serious problem for enemy aircraft using powerful electronic countermeasures. Instead of breaking the lock, a jammer can become the signal that guides the missile toward its target.
🔸 The missile uses an upgraded solid-fuel motor with greater energy than the earlier RVV-SD. Russia has not disclosed its exact maximum range, but confirms that it exceeds the predecessor’s 110 km reach.
🔸 Internal carriage is central to the design. Folding aerodynamic surfaces allow the RVV-SDM to fit inside the Su-57, avoiding external pylons that would increase radar visibility and drag.
🔸 The “fire-and-forget” capability allows the Su-57 to launch, change course and leave the threatened area while the missile independently completes the final stage of the interception.
🔸 RVV-SDM fills the middle layer of the Su-57’s air-combat arsenal between the short-range RVV-MD2 and long-range RVV-BD. The fighter can therefore carry different weapons for close combat, conventional beyond-visual-range engagements and attacks against high-value aircraft at much greater distances.
Rosoboronexport is also offering the missile with the Su-57E and says it can be integrated onto other Russian-made fighters after modification. That gives foreign Su-57 operators access to the same combination of internal carriage, improved range and guidance built to operate through electronic warfare.
For NATO pilots, switching on the jammer may no longer provide a clean escape route. The signal intended to protect the aircraft could instead help the Russian missile find it.
Do you think NATO has an answer to the Su-57’s new missile?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤57🔥27👍14🫡3🤬1
🚨🇨🇳 China Bets on AI Healthcare as Its Next Global Industry
A routine diabetes checkup in Ningbo led to an unexpected diagnosis. Alibaba’s Panda system reviewed Qiu Sijun’s CT scan and detected early-stage pancreatic cancer before symptoms appeared. The case illustrates more than a medical breakthrough: China is turning its vast healthcare system into a testing ground for an industry it could eventually export worldwide.
The country has nearly ideal conditions for scaling medical AI. Its population is aging, smaller cities face severe shortages of qualified doctors, and more than 90% of top-tier hospitals already use AI-assisted information systems. By 2030, Beijing plans to extend AI diagnostics into primary-care clinics and make medical-image analysis and clinical decision support standard in larger hospitals.
This domestic rollout gives Chinese companies access to enormous clinical demand and the opportunity to test their systems across hospitals, county clinics and consumer platforms. Ant Group’s A-Fu already has 120M users, while AI general practitioners have delivered more than 10M consultations in Suzhou alone.
Medical imaging is among the most promising fields. In a trial involving more than 180,000 CT scans, Panda helped doctors identify around two dozen pancreatic cancers, including 14 at an early stage. The system received “breakthrough device” status from the US Food and Drug Administration in 2025, an important step toward international acceptance.
China could eventually export an entire medical AI ecosystem: diagnostic software, cloud platforms for hospitals, virtual doctors, smart monitoring devices, pathology systems and tools for drug development. Such products would be particularly attractive to countries facing aging populations, doctor shortages and rising treatment costs but lacking the resources to expand conventional healthcare quickly.
The technology is already moving into pharmaceuticals. Likang Life Sciences is building a 110M yuan ($16.3M) facility for LK101, a personalized mRNA cancer vaccine developed with AI. Huawei, meanwhile, is deploying its RuiPath pathology model in county hospitals to help address China’s shortage of more than 140,000 pathologists.
Chinese entities accounted for over 60% of global healthcare AI patents in 2022 and 2023. The domestic market is forecast to expand from $600M in 2022 to $11.9B by 2030.
Fragmented medical records, regulation and concerns over sensitive health data could complicate foreign expansion. But China possesses a combination few competitors can match: immense clinical demand, digital infrastructure, state support and the manufacturing capacity to make advanced healthcare technology affordable at scale. That could turn AI medicine into China’s next major global industry.
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
A routine diabetes checkup in Ningbo led to an unexpected diagnosis. Alibaba’s Panda system reviewed Qiu Sijun’s CT scan and detected early-stage pancreatic cancer before symptoms appeared. The case illustrates more than a medical breakthrough: China is turning its vast healthcare system into a testing ground for an industry it could eventually export worldwide.
The country has nearly ideal conditions for scaling medical AI. Its population is aging, smaller cities face severe shortages of qualified doctors, and more than 90% of top-tier hospitals already use AI-assisted information systems. By 2030, Beijing plans to extend AI diagnostics into primary-care clinics and make medical-image analysis and clinical decision support standard in larger hospitals.
This domestic rollout gives Chinese companies access to enormous clinical demand and the opportunity to test their systems across hospitals, county clinics and consumer platforms. Ant Group’s A-Fu already has 120M users, while AI general practitioners have delivered more than 10M consultations in Suzhou alone.
Medical imaging is among the most promising fields. In a trial involving more than 180,000 CT scans, Panda helped doctors identify around two dozen pancreatic cancers, including 14 at an early stage. The system received “breakthrough device” status from the US Food and Drug Administration in 2025, an important step toward international acceptance.
China could eventually export an entire medical AI ecosystem: diagnostic software, cloud platforms for hospitals, virtual doctors, smart monitoring devices, pathology systems and tools for drug development. Such products would be particularly attractive to countries facing aging populations, doctor shortages and rising treatment costs but lacking the resources to expand conventional healthcare quickly.
The technology is already moving into pharmaceuticals. Likang Life Sciences is building a 110M yuan ($16.3M) facility for LK101, a personalized mRNA cancer vaccine developed with AI. Huawei, meanwhile, is deploying its RuiPath pathology model in county hospitals to help address China’s shortage of more than 140,000 pathologists.
Chinese entities accounted for over 60% of global healthcare AI patents in 2022 and 2023. The domestic market is forecast to expand from $600M in 2022 to $11.9B by 2030.
Fragmented medical records, regulation and concerns over sensitive health data could complicate foreign expansion. But China possesses a combination few competitors can match: immense clinical demand, digital infrastructure, state support and the manufacturing capacity to make advanced healthcare technology affordable at scale. That could turn AI medicine into China’s next major global industry.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏45❤25🔥7👌4👍2
🚨🇨🇳 China Is Funding the Science America Is Cutting
A meeting at China’s Beidaihe resort sent a message about the next stage of the technology race. Cai Qi, the fifth-ranking figure in the Communist Party and one of Xi Jinping’s closest aides, welcomed leading specialists in basic research, strategic technologies and key scientific fields as China’s leadership began its annual summer retreat.
Beijing is preparing to spend heavily on research that may not produce commercial results for years. China invested 3.93T yuan ($551B) in R&D in 2025, up 8.1% year on year and equal to 2.8% of GDP. Under its new five-year plan, research spending is targeted to grow by at least 7% annually through 2030.
The US still leads in nominal terms, spending $993B on R&D in 2024. Adjusted for purchasing power, however, OECD figures put China at $1.03T and the US at $1.01T that year. China has effectively reached parity in how much scientific work its money can support at home.
Beijing is backing the full chain from basic science to commercial technology. Foundational research accounted for 7.1% of China’s R&D spending last year, while new rules are strengthening intellectual property protection for chip designs. DeepSeek and Moonshot AI’s Kimi models show how a growing domestic research ecosystem can produce globally competitive technology.
Washington is moving in the opposite direction. The Trump administration’s proposed 2027 budget would cut non-defense R&D by 4% while increasing defense R&D by nearly 80%. Yet the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation found that most of the increase is concentrated in development and late-stage testing. Defense-related basic research would still fall 9%, while applied research would drop 15%.
The administration wants to shift resources away from universities and toward “action and delivery,” particularly in AI. That may accelerate today’s programs, but it also weakens the research base from which tomorrow’s chips, materials, energy systems and AI architectures will emerge.
US export controls were meant to preserve America’s technological lead. However, they have pushed China to invest more aggressively in self-reliance just as Washington begins narrowing its own scientific pipeline.
The AI race may ultimately be won by the country funding the discoveries that come after the current generation of models.
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
A meeting at China’s Beidaihe resort sent a message about the next stage of the technology race. Cai Qi, the fifth-ranking figure in the Communist Party and one of Xi Jinping’s closest aides, welcomed leading specialists in basic research, strategic technologies and key scientific fields as China’s leadership began its annual summer retreat.
Beijing is preparing to spend heavily on research that may not produce commercial results for years. China invested 3.93T yuan ($551B) in R&D in 2025, up 8.1% year on year and equal to 2.8% of GDP. Under its new five-year plan, research spending is targeted to grow by at least 7% annually through 2030.
The US still leads in nominal terms, spending $993B on R&D in 2024. Adjusted for purchasing power, however, OECD figures put China at $1.03T and the US at $1.01T that year. China has effectively reached parity in how much scientific work its money can support at home.
Beijing is backing the full chain from basic science to commercial technology. Foundational research accounted for 7.1% of China’s R&D spending last year, while new rules are strengthening intellectual property protection for chip designs. DeepSeek and Moonshot AI’s Kimi models show how a growing domestic research ecosystem can produce globally competitive technology.
Washington is moving in the opposite direction. The Trump administration’s proposed 2027 budget would cut non-defense R&D by 4% while increasing defense R&D by nearly 80%. Yet the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation found that most of the increase is concentrated in development and late-stage testing. Defense-related basic research would still fall 9%, while applied research would drop 15%.
The administration wants to shift resources away from universities and toward “action and delivery,” particularly in AI. That may accelerate today’s programs, but it also weakens the research base from which tomorrow’s chips, materials, energy systems and AI architectures will emerge.
US export controls were meant to preserve America’s technological lead. However, they have pushed China to invest more aggressively in self-reliance just as Washington begins narrowing its own scientific pipeline.
The AI race may ultimately be won by the country funding the discoveries that come after the current generation of models.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤31👍24🔥10👏4
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🚨🇷🇺🇮🇷 U.S. Bases Face Russia's Upgraded Shahed Attack Drones
U.S. bases across the Middle East face a more dangerous Shahed threat as reports indicate that Russia is returning battlefield-tested upgrades to the Iranian design. AP reported in March that upgraded Russian-built drones were being sent to Tehran, while Reuters later said Western analysts were examining whether Russian technology helped Iranian drones strike CIA facilities in Riyadh and eastern Iraq.
🔸 Iran originally supplied Russia with the Shahed-136 design. Russia then established mass production of its Geran-2 derivative and refined it through years of large-scale combat use.
🔸 Russian development work has produced Shahed variants with improved satellite navigation, stronger protection against jamming, new radio links, cameras and upgraded flight computers. Other versions have appeared with jet engines and onboard AI, although AP’s sources did not identify which variants were reportedly sent to Iran.
🔸 Reuters cited two Western officials who believed Russian-enhanced Shaheds were used in the attack on the U.S. Embassy in Riyadh. One drone reportedly opened a hole in the building before a second passed through it and detonated near the CIA station. No casualties were reported.
🔸 Western intelligence sources also claim Russia supplied Iran with the Kometa-M satellite-navigation module, designed to maintain greater accuracy under electronic attack. The Kremlin dismissed the report as “fake news.”
🔸 Faster and harder-to-jam drones create an expensive problem for defenders. Low-cost Shaheds can arrive in waves, forcing U.S. forces to consume limited stocks of missiles that cost far more than the targets they destroy.
🔸 AP’s sources could not confirm the number or exact type of drones involved. But access to Russian navigation, communications and anti-jamming upgrades could matter more than the size of a single shipment.
Iran supplied the original design. Russia mass-produced it, improved it under years of battlefield pressure and may now be returning those lessons to Tehran. For U.S. bases, the danger is not one drone but repeated salvos that are harder to jam, faster to adapt and far cheaper than the missiles used to stop them.
Do you think upgraded Shaheds could change the balance in the U.S.-Iran conflict?
@NewRulesGeo❗ Follow us on X
U.S. bases across the Middle East face a more dangerous Shahed threat as reports indicate that Russia is returning battlefield-tested upgrades to the Iranian design. AP reported in March that upgraded Russian-built drones were being sent to Tehran, while Reuters later said Western analysts were examining whether Russian technology helped Iranian drones strike CIA facilities in Riyadh and eastern Iraq.
🔸 Iran originally supplied Russia with the Shahed-136 design. Russia then established mass production of its Geran-2 derivative and refined it through years of large-scale combat use.
🔸 Russian development work has produced Shahed variants with improved satellite navigation, stronger protection against jamming, new radio links, cameras and upgraded flight computers. Other versions have appeared with jet engines and onboard AI, although AP’s sources did not identify which variants were reportedly sent to Iran.
🔸 Reuters cited two Western officials who believed Russian-enhanced Shaheds were used in the attack on the U.S. Embassy in Riyadh. One drone reportedly opened a hole in the building before a second passed through it and detonated near the CIA station. No casualties were reported.
🔸 Western intelligence sources also claim Russia supplied Iran with the Kometa-M satellite-navigation module, designed to maintain greater accuracy under electronic attack. The Kremlin dismissed the report as “fake news.”
🔸 Faster and harder-to-jam drones create an expensive problem for defenders. Low-cost Shaheds can arrive in waves, forcing U.S. forces to consume limited stocks of missiles that cost far more than the targets they destroy.
🔸 AP’s sources could not confirm the number or exact type of drones involved. But access to Russian navigation, communications and anti-jamming upgrades could matter more than the size of a single shipment.
Iran supplied the original design. Russia mass-produced it, improved it under years of battlefield pressure and may now be returning those lessons to Tehran. For U.S. bases, the danger is not one drone but repeated salvos that are harder to jam, faster to adapt and far cheaper than the missiles used to stop them.
Do you think upgraded Shaheds could change the balance in the U.S.-Iran conflict?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤63🔥32👍21👏9🫡5