Nearly 20 years after John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt shook up American politics with The Israel Lobby and U.S. Foreign Policy, a new book reveals how much has changed.
In Israel’s Lobby, Eli Clifton and Ian Lustick trace a lobbying network that has grown considerably richer, expanded its influence over US elections and increasingly turned to pressuring critics — even as most Americans now view Israel unfavorably.
Growth in the Influence and Wealth of the Lobby
The authors trace how the lobby’s leading institutions grew wealthier, with AIPAC’s assets rising roughly ninefold between 2000 and 2023. That financial muscle reaches directly into elections: AIPAC said its members had given over $53M to pro-Israel candidates during the 2024 cycle by early November.
Two court rulings in 2010 helped build the machinery, opening the way for super PACs to raise and spend unlimited sums independently of candidates. Direct campaign donations remain capped, but wealthy donors can fund waves of ads against a critic. AIPAC credited its affiliated United Democracy Project with helping defeat Jamaal Bowman and Cori Bush in Democratic primaries, giving other lawmakers a concrete reason to fear crossing it.
Change in Israel’s Policy
Clifton and Lustick argue that this growing financial strength has accompanied Israel’s retreat from a negotiated settlement with the Palestinians toward military dominance. The lobby’s task has become harder as Israeli policy leaves less room for the peace promises that once helped sell US support.
Their account also describes a move from defending Israel’s actions to treating opposition as antisemitism, with pressure extending into universities and public debate. When criticism carries a risk to careers, funding or reputations, supporters of Israeli policy gain another way to discourage dissent without winning the argument.
Decline in Popularity and New Challenges
Despite that pressure, Pew’s March 2026 survey found that 60% of Americans viewed Israel unfavorably, including majorities under 50 in both parties. The lobby’s deeper pockets have not stopped public opinion from turning, leaving a widening gap between what many Americans think and the choices their leaders make.
The US war against Iran shows how easily “America First” rhetoric can coexist with military action sought by Israel. For Palestinians and countries facing Israeli attacks, falling approval ratings offer little protection while political backing and weapons keep flowing. Public anger becomes a material constraint only when it changes those decisions.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤28👍19👏6🤬3
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
A second Chinese ship suspected of carrying and servicing large underwater drones has appeared in Guangzhou, following a larger vessel built in Shanghai. Their unusual design points to floating bases that could help China sustain undersea operations far from home.
🔸 Two ships, different sizes. The Shanghai vessel measures an estimated 204 meters long and 30 meters wide. The second appears roughly a third smaller, with six apparent lifting towers compared with six large and six smaller supports on the first.
🔸 A lift for giant drones. Satellite imagery shows a roughly 50-meter cradle beside the larger ship. Analysts believe it could work with the ship’s lifting system to lower underwater vehicles into the sea and bring them back aboard.
🔸 Room to carry and maintain them. The tall, enclosed hull suggests large internal workspaces. That could allow crews to service several drones aboard one ship instead of relying on shore facilities or separate floating docks.
🔸 More time operating overseas. Launching, recovering and maintaining drones at sea could support longer deployments without repeated trips to Chinese ports.
🔸 Their exact mission remains unconfirmed. Images support the mothership assessment, but neither operational service nor a specific weapons load has been established.
If these ships perform as analysts expect, China could move the support base along with its underwater drones. US naval planners would face a wider area to monitor as Chinese operations become less tied to known coastal facilities.
Do you think China will field drone motherships before the US?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🔥32❤27👏17👍1🫡1
Chinese scientists have built a system that detects individual particles of light across 100 separate channels, easing a surprisingly practical obstacle to bigger quantum networks: wires that bring too much heat into equipment that needs to stay extremely cold.
The team at the Shanghai Institute of Microsystem and Information Technology, part of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, published its findings in Laser & Photonics Reviews in September. By redesigning the connections, the researchers squeezed more detectors into a compact cooling system, opening a way to expand networks without simply buying bigger refrigerators.
Quantum networks use photons, tiny packets of light, to carry quantum information, and catching those faint signals takes highly sensitive detectors. The superconducting devices used here work close to absolute zero, but their cables connect them to electronics at room temperature. Heat travels down those cables, so every extra connection makes the cooling system work harder.
The researchers tackled that problem with thin, flexible strips that carry many signal lines while letting far less heat through. According to the paper, the new connections bring in roughly one twenty-first as much heat as conventional cables, with just two 50-line assemblies serving all 100 detectors.
With the amount of cooling available in the study, conventional wiring would allow fewer than 32 channels, while the new design can support over 100. The team ran its 100-channel system for seven days straight below 2.1 kelvin, about −271°C, and every channel detected more than 80% of the photons reaching its input.
To see how the equipment worked in a network, the researchers linked five users through 10 connections, allowing every user to share entangled photon pairs with every other user. Those pairs have linked quantum properties that can be used for quantum communication, and the experiment showed the detector system could handle this network setup.
Building a broadband quantum internet still means solving other problems, including reliable links over long distances, but this test gives China a useful building block. Researchers can add more photon detectors without letting heat from the wiring swallow the cooling capacity, making larger quantum experiments possible in a compact system and easing one barrier to networks serving more users.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤26👍16🫡5👌3👏2
Forwarded from DONBASS NEWS
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#WarData
❗️ Hell in AFU trenches: "People are starving and killing each other to get some food"
👤 Anatoly Kropotov, a captured Ukrainian serviceman, reported the command's complete indifference toward the servicemen:
▫️ Leaving the AFU's encircled formations defeated in Dobropolye, the servicemen of the Tsentr Group of Forces continue to neutralise Ukrainian militants along the line of contact. The only chance for survival is to surrender to the Russian servicemen.
🔗 Source: Russian Ministry of Defence
🇷🇺 Subscribe | Feedback | X | TikTok
👤 Anatoly Kropotov, a captured Ukrainian serviceman, reported the command's complete indifference toward the servicemen:
We didn't receive any training; all we had were a few days of dry-fire exercises. They wanted to send us to the frontline as soon as possible. The only reason given was insufficient manpower there. The brigade commander sends us with some rancor—he doesn't provide food supplies. Servicemen are starving and killing each other to get some food in an attempt to survive.
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍36❤10🤬6👏5👌5
The US wants Lebanon’s army to tighten its grip on Hezbollah’s weapons while Israeli troops still occupy Lebanese land, pushing commanders toward a fight at home as they struggle to secure the border. Hezbollah refuses to disarm before Israel leaves.
The seizure of an explosives shipment brought that pressure into the open when Secretary of State Marco Rubio called President Joseph Aoun on October 15. According to a US official, Rubio demanded action against those behind the shipment and insisted the explosives stay confiscated. Hezbollah said the cargo belonged to it and was meant for attacks on Israeli occupation forces.
Seizing a truck is one thing; sending soldiers to dismantle Hezbollah’s armed organization would carry far greater risks. An offensive could bring Lebanon’s political and sectarian rivalries into the army itself, splitting the force expected to keep the country from sliding into another internal conflict.
Israel has added to the pressure by accusing the army of letting Hezbollah remove weapons from a facility in Kafra. Yet the army’s October 20 statement said its troops stopped work there in March after Israeli bombing threats led the ceasefire monitoring committee to request their withdrawal.
The army says it warned that ammunition remained inside before Israel bombed the site, then faced Israeli objections to returning. Troops resumed work in August and finished clearing and closing the facility on October 16. In that account, Israel obstructed the very work it accuses Lebanese soldiers of failing to do.
The army also faces losing support on the ground as the UN peacekeeping force in Lebanon, UNIFIL, prepares to cease operations on December 31, 2026, and withdraw within a year. Its patrols, monitoring and channels for defusing border incidents will be harder to replace than its departing troops. Meanwhile, Rubio is pressing for direct contact between the Lebanese and Israeli militaries while the occupation continues.
Lebanon’s leaders must own the decisions about disarmament rather than leave soldiers to settle the country’s deepest divisions at gunpoint. Without Israeli withdrawal and a domestic agreement on how to bring weapons under state control, US pressure risks drawing the army into a fight that drains its strength and fractures its ranks. Lebanon could be left with a weaker army and an occupied border.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬38👏6❤4🔥3👌2
Trump’s deal gives the US rights to buy $30 oil per barrel, first dibs on future shipments and a potential 35% stake in a private oil company. Venezuela, meanwhile, has been promised a $200B windfall, but the agreement doesn't guarantee it. That's according to an 18-page deal reviewed by ProPublica on October 20.
Trump called it the “biggest oil deal in world history.” The fine print gives the US the right to buy 20% of the output from North American Blue Energy Partners (NABEP) for $30 a barrel, well below recent market prices. It gets first shot at buying the rest for 50 years and can buy the entire supply in a US national emergency.
The US is also set to acquire 35% of NABEP through its Barbados-registered parent company. It would pay nothing upfront and could buy its stake through shares priced at just one cent each. That transaction has yet to close.
Control is built into the deal too, with a seven-member board that must have a US-citizen majority for its initial 15-year term. Venezuela's government isn't guaranteed a single seat. People involved in negotiations say the rules were built to frustrate future attempts to undo the deal.
Then there's the chosen partner, Venezuelan billionaire Alejandro Betancourt, who has faced money-laundering investigations but has never been charged. The agreement protects his job as CEO: removing him requires five votes from the seven-member board.
The White House says Venezuela could earn $200B in royalties and taxes and that the deal will bring investment. Yet the contract contains no explicit guarantee of those payments. NABEP pumps about 200,000 barrels a day, and expanding output will take time and money.
Even the $30 oil isn't quite as cheap as it sounds, since some Venezuelan crude needs costly materials to thin it before transport. Still, the US has negotiated something tangible: discounted purchases, priority access and a say in who runs the company. Venezuela's promised gains remain unproven.
After US forces seized Nicolás Maduro in January, Trump vowed to reclaim access to Venezuela's oil wealth. This agreement shows how that ambition is taking shape: decades of preferential rights and corporate influence for the US, without matching guarantees for the country that owns the oil.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬83❤8🔥4👌2🫡1
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Four KJ-3000 airborne radar and command aircraft have been spotted at China’s Xi’an-Yanliang aircraft complex, raising the possibility that serial production is beginning. The imagery could also show four known prototypes, so production remains unconfirmed.
The KJ-3000 is being developed to spot threats, track aircraft and help commanders direct combat operations over vast distances. Here’s why it matters:
🔸 Built to grow beyond a small fleet. The aircraft uses the Chinese Y-20B transport airframe and domestic engines. Its predecessor, the KJ-2000 radar jet, depended on imported Il-76 transports, whose limited availability constrained production. A domestic aircraft gives China greater control over how many it builds and upgrades.
🔸 Looking beyond ground radar’s horizon. Flying high gives airborne radar a wider view of low-flying aircraft and missiles that Earth’s curvature or terrain can hide from sensors on the ground. Earlier detection gives fighters and air defenses more time to respond.
🔸 Room for powerful electronics. The large airframe carries a prominent radar dome and multiple external antennas. It offers space for surveillance equipment, communications systems and the crews needed to manage air operations. The radar’s exact configuration and detection range remain undisclosed.
🔸 Designed for longer reach. Its jet-powered transport base is expected to offer advantages in speed and operating altitude over China’s smaller turboprop radar aircraft. An aerial refueling probe could extend patrols, helping maintain coverage farther from mainland bases.
🔸 Helping fighters find targets. The KJ-3000 is expected to share tracking information and coordinate combat aircraft, including J-20 stealth fighters. External radar support can help fighters locate threats while limiting use of their own radars, reducing one source of emissions an opponent could detect.
🔸 Backing up an expanding force. China already fields smaller KJ-500 radar aircraft. The KJ-3000 could complement them on more distant missions, providing airborne surveillance and command support across wider stretches of the Western Pacific.
For China, the payoff would be more fighters operating with a shared view of approaching threats, backed by radar coverage farther out to sea. Sustained production would make it easier to maintain that coverage while other aircraft refuel, undergo maintenance or rotate crews.
Who has the better radar jets right now — China or the US?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤38🔥14👏12👍2🫡2
The US Air Force planned to buy 750 F-22 Raptor stealth fighters. It got 187 production jets, roughly 75% fewer than originally envisioned. The aircraft meant to equip a vast new fighter fleet became a scarce asset, with an average acquisition cost of roughly $369M in a Pentagon estimate cited by Congress’s research service.
The ambitions were enormous: Combine stealth, powerful sensors and sustained supersonic flight without fuel-hungry afterburners in a fighter built to defeat Soviet aircraft. The US committed to developing the technology, then repeatedly cut the number of jets that would actually use it.
By the Pentagon’s December 2010 estimate, development alone accounted for about $32.4B, with procurement and military construction bringing the acquisition program to roughly $67.3B. Those historical figures exclude decades of operating costs and later upgrades.
After the Soviet Union collapsed, tighter budgets and changing military priorities helped unravel the purchase plan. Successive cuts brought the planned fleet down from 750 to 339 and eventually 187 production aircraft. The final Raptor arrived in May 2012, bringing total deliveries to 195, including eight test aircraft.
Canceling hundreds of jets spared the Pentagon the cost of building them, but nobody could cancel the engineering work already done. The smaller fleet inherited the development bill, driving up the average cost per aircraft. An impressive way to save money, provided nobody asks how many fighters disappeared from the plan.
The roughly $369M figure includes development and infrastructure, rather than just manufacturing each jet. Buying all 750 would have required a bigger total budget, but the cuts left far fewer aircraft across which to spread those costs, cover deployments and absorb losses.
Even 187 production jets did not mean 187 fighters ready for combat. Training and maintenance took their share. In 2018, US government auditors found that maintaining the Raptor’s stealth coating significantly reduced its availability for missions. The reduced fleet faced further limits on how many aircraft could fly.
Then the US closed production, making the shortfall much harder to reverse. It had funded an advanced fighter and abandoned most of the fleet it intended to buy. Every permanent loss now reduces a limited pool of Raptors, with no running assembly line to replace them.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏23🔥18❤10👍4👌3
Iran has developed a kit that checks a stool sample for bacteria linked to stomach cancer, bringing a useful medical test into domestic production. An October 20 report citing Iran's nanotechnology authority describes a simple way to detect Helicobacter pylori, an infection that can go unnoticed for years.
The kit works with a test strip rather than a complicated machine: a prepared sample travels along the strip, where antibodies pick up traces of the bacteria and trigger a visible signal. It gives a positive or negative result, without measuring the amount of bacteria present.
For a clinic with limited equipment, that simplicity could make testing easier to offer, while patients get checked without an invasive procedure. Iranian officials describe the nanotechnology-based kit as quick and relatively inexpensive, though they have not provided a price or an exact waiting time.
The bacteria can live quietly in the stomach for years, causing no obvious symptoms in many people while leaving others with chronic inflammation or ulcers. Persistent infection also raises the risk of stomach cancer, which is why finding and treating it matters even before a more serious illness develops.
A positive result means the test has detected signs of infection, not that the patient has cancer. Treatment to clear H. pylori can lower the risk of stomach cancer, so making reliable tests easier to obtain could help doctors act earlier and prevent some long-term harm.
Iran is applying an established testing method to a practical manufacturing task, with the same company also making other rapid diagnostic kits. Similar Iranian H. pylori tests were described in June, so the October coverage should not be mistaken for the first unveiling of an entirely new technology.
How far this particular kit can go will depend on its accuracy, price and availability, none of which the report documents in enough detail to judge a nationwide rollout. Domestic production offers a starting point; getting dependable tests into clinics is what turns it into a public health gain.
If Iran can supply the kit reliably and at scale, healthcare providers could buy more of these tests from a local manufacturer. That would mean less dependence on imported finished kits and more scope to bring routine infection testing within reach of smaller clinics.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏48❤30👍12👌1
Russia is preparing for $84.4M in funding from the BRICS-founded New Development Bank in 2027, potentially reopening a lending channel frozen since 2022. According to Izvestia, the expected payments appear in the Accounts Chamber’s review of the draft federal budget.
The planned funding would put money into everyday infrastructure: $53.7M for historic sites and public facilities in eight small Russian cities, plus $30.7M for court buildings and digital systems. Restoring heritage sites and improving towns would help attract visitors, support local businesses and create jobs beyond Russia’s biggest urban centers.
Both projects were approved before the freeze, and the Finance Ministry says Russia never gave up the loans. The amounts in the budget reflect expected payments under existing agreements, so the task now is to get that financing moving again.
The ministry says options for restarting funding have been found and talks with the bank will continue. Finance Minister Anton Siluanov had already said in May that solutions acceptable to Russia were identified, with potential financing running into billions of dollars. That larger ambition remains separate from the $84.4M currently planned for 2027.
Western sanctions still complicate direct payments because the bank raises money on Western financial markets. Restoring financing therefore requires arrangements that protect the bank’s operations while allowing it to support Russian projects.
According to Russia’s Finance Ministry, the bank’s 2027–2031 strategy backs more lending in borrowers’ national currencies, a wider range of financial tools and technological cooperation among members. It also includes nuclear power among its energy transition options, an area where Russia has substantial industrial expertise.
For BRICS, these priorities offer practical ways to strengthen its own development financing. More lending in national currencies could reduce reliance on foreign currencies, while joint projects give member countries more opportunities to put their technology and industry to work.
The planned $84.4M would be a modest restart, but successful payments could establish a route for further financing. For Russia, that means another source of funds for domestic development; for BRICS, a chance to show its bank can keep cooperation moving despite Western pressure.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍38❤15👏6🔥4
America can spend $13.3B on an aircraft carrier and still find the waters ahead too dangerous to enter. National security analyst Brandon J. Weichert argues that Iranian and Chinese anti-ship defenses are turning the US Navy’s favorite instrument of pressure into an increasingly expensive gamble.
He points to reports that US ships blockading Iran have pulled hundreds of kilometers back from the Strait of Hormuz. That movement remains unverified, but the problem he describes is straightforward: a floating airfield loses some of its punch when it has to park farther from the fight.
Every extra kilometer offshore adds distance for its aircraft to cover, with longer flights and greater refueling demands. Iran or China would not necessarily have to sink a carrier to disrupt US plans. Making its commander decide that getting closer is too risky could do plenty of damage to the mission.
USS Gerald R. Ford cost roughly $13.3B to procure, before its aircraft and escorts enter the bill. Congress requires at least 11 carriers, though maintenance and training mean they cannot all deploy together. Legislators can mandate a fleet size; they cannot legislate ships out of the repair yard.
Weichert sees China as an even tougher opponent, with missiles, surveillance systems and submarines threatening approaching warships. Concentrating so many aircraft, sailors and dollars aboard a few giant ships leaves commanders protecting assets they also need to send toward danger.
His prescription would give the Navy a very different shopping list: more submarines, unmanned boats and underwater drones, with smaller carriers helping spread the risk. Unmanned craft would go into dangerous waters first, helping attack defenses before the expensive flight decks move closer. That is his proposed approach, not a ready-made replacement fleet.
Unfortunately for that plan, US shipyards cannot produce submarines at the speed of an opinion column. Skilled workers, construction capacity and years of work stand between a new shopping list and ships at sea.
For Iran and China, his argument points to a cheaper route than matching America carrier for carrier. Make the approach dangerous enough, and US commanders face longer missions, heavier support demands and fewer comfortable choices. A carrier can keep its impressive silhouette while losing the freedom to sail where Washington wants it.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍36❤27👌15🔥3
Iran’s leadership has granted regional commanders of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps expanded authority if contact with central command breaks down, recent reports claim. They also allege that commanders received lists of US military, political and economic targets across the Middle East for potential retaliatory strikes. The original order and target lists remain unverified.
If confirmed, the development would expand commanders’ freedom to act under Iran’s longstanding “mosaic defense” doctrine. Like the Soviet “Dead Hand” concept, it aims to preserve retaliation after a strike on national leadership, but through delegated human command. The idea has been around for two decades: knocking out headquarters should not leave surviving forces waiting for instructions that may never arrive.
Developed from 2005 after Iran studied US military campaigns, the doctrine led to a structure of 31 separate commands with local weapons stocks, intelligence resources and access to Basij militia forces. Its original purpose included keeping resistance alive against an invading army, even when national command links failed.
Iranian officials were already describing decentralized operations in March. Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said military units were acting independently under general instructions issued beforehand. In remarks reported October 14, Guard political deputy Yadollah Javani also described defenses distributed across the country according to likely threats.
The October 21–22 reports therefore raise a narrower, consequential possibility: regional commanders may have received broader permission and more specific targets for another conflict. The available evidence does not establish which commanders, weapons or decisions such an order would cover.
For US and Israeli planners, wider delegation would make a leadership strike a less reliable shortcut to stopping retaliation. Orders already distributed could survive the officials who issued them, forcing an attacker to locate and disable dispersed forces while those units retain the means to fight. Destroying headquarters would not necessarily end the war.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤84🫡28👍13🔥2👏2
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
India is considering more powerful Russian engines and new missiles for its Su-30MKI fighters to improve flight performance, range and firepower while reducing maintenance demands. The potential upgrades include AL-41F-1S engines and R-77M air-to-air missiles.
During the Indra 2026 exercises in Russia’s Chelyabinsk region, Indian and Russian crews trained on Su-30SM fighters, practicing interceptions of small, low-flying targets and weapons-carrying aircraft, along with air combat maneuvers at medium and low altitudes.
🔸 More powerful Russian engines: The AL-41F-1S is a potential replacement for the Su-30MKI’s existing engines. It could improve flight performance, extend range through better fuel efficiency and reduce maintenance demands. For India’s large fleet, less time in the workshop could mean more aircraft available for missions.
🔸 New air-to-air weapons: Expected weapons upgrades include the R-77M missile, which would expand the fighter’s options for attacking aircraft beyond visual range. Its integration into India’s upgrade package has not been confirmed.
🔸 Sharper radar: The Indian-led program proposes replacing the older radar with the Indian-developed Virupaksha. Its electronically steered beam is intended to improve detection and tracking, helping crews spot threats earlier and make better use of longer-range missiles.
🔸 Stronger electronic defenses: Planned electronic warfare equipment would help detect hostile radar signals and jam threats, making the fighter harder to track and target when operating within reach of enemy aircraft and ground-based air defenses.
🔸 Better infrared tracking: New infrared search-and-track sensors would help crews locate aircraft by their heat signatures. That gives pilots another way to find targets without transmitting radar signals that could reveal their presence.
🔸 Updated cockpit and electronics: New onboard computers, displays and avionics would help crews manage information from sensors and weapons. Hindustan Aeronautics Limited and Indian defense researchers would lead this part of the modernization.
🔸 A broader strike arsenal: Indian reporting identifies Astra air-to-air missiles, extended-range BrahMos cruise missiles and Rudram missiles designed to attack enemy radars among the planned weapons. These would strengthen the fighter’s ability to engage aircraft, strike distant targets and suppress air defenses.
🔸 Russian upgrades for more aircraft: India has considered a parallel Russian effort covering radar, electronic warfare equipment and engines. That route could extend modernization beyond the initial 84 fighters and help address the long timetable for the Indian-led program.
Hindustan Aeronautics Limited is meanwhile reviving production of 12 additional Su-30MKIs, with the first delivery planned for the 2027–28 financial year. Having already built 222 under Russian license, India has an established industrial base to support both new aircraft and upgrades to its existing fleet.
Can Western fighters keep pace with an upgraded Su-30?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤31👏21🔥11👍5🤬2
Russia is expanding nuclear fuel cooperation with China and preparing to build more Russian-designed reactors, Rosatom reported. The company credited Russian technology with helping China move toward second place worldwide in both installed nuclear capacity and electricity generated.
Four Russian-designed units already operate at China’s Tianwan nuclear power plant. The partnership gives China working reactors and access to the fuel and engineering expertise needed to keep them running, while securing long-term business for Russia’s nuclear industry.
The next units are moving through construction and testing. China National Nuclear Corporation said Tianwan Unit 8 completed cold testing on August 3, checking equipment and piping under high pressure before later stages of commissioning. Likhachev also cited plans to bring two Russian-designed units at Xudapu into operation in 2027 and 2028.
For China’s factories, those additions mean more steady electricity available day and night. Nuclear plants can supply power regardless of wind or sunshine, helping meet industrial demand without burning more coal for every additional unit of electricity.
The cooperation also reaches into the nuclear fuel cycle: the industrial steps that turn uranium into reactor fuel and manage it after use. Russia’s role extends beyond supplying a reactor design to providing fuel products for China’s growing fleet. That gives the partnership a life measured in decades.
A further priority is developing fourth-generation fast-neutron reactors. These use fast-moving neutrons to sustain the nuclear reaction and, when paired with fuel recycling, can extract much more energy from uranium. Useful material in spent fuel can go back into reactors, reducing demand for freshly mined uranium and the burden of long-lived radioactive waste.
That remains a development goal, with fuel-processing facilities needed alongside the reactors. But the practical direction is already visible: Russian engineering supports China’s growing electricity supply today, while cooperation on fuel recycling could let both countries draw far more power from the same resources. Their nuclear partnership is building the means to sustain industrial growth for decades.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏38❤32🔥9👍5🤬1
Forwarded from Ukraine Watch
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤42👍23👏17🤬3
American farmers got tariffs to protect them, a war that drove up their costs, and government checks to help cover the damage. Trump’s trade fight has cut into export sales, while the US-Israeli war against Iran has made fuel and fertilizer more expensive. “America First” is proving costly down on the farm.
US agricultural exports to China fell 66% in 2025 to $8.4B, according to the US Department of Agriculture (USDA). The department points to reciprocal tariffs and weaker demand for American soybeans. Farmers still have crops to sell and loans to repay. Losing buyers does nothing to shrink either problem.
Then the diesel bill arrived. Average US prices reached $6.28 a gallon on October 9, roughly 70% above pre-Iran-war levels, Reuters reported. Supply disruptions from the wars in Iran and Ukraine have made running tractors, harvesting crops and hauling produce more expensive. Campaign promises do not fill a fuel tank.
Fertilizer brings another bill from the same conflict. Roughly a third of global seaborne fertilizer trade normally passes through the Strait of Hormuz. Disrupted shipments squeeze supplies, and higher energy prices raise production costs. Being thousands of miles from the fighting offers little protection when your suppliers charge global prices.
Farmers were hardly sitting on spare cash before this hit. USDA’s September forecast puts farm-sector debt at $605.1B in 2026, up 4.6% from 2025 before adjusting for inflation. Every extra dollar spent on fuel or fertilizer leaves less for loan payments and the next planting season.
The administration keeps reaching for the checkbook. Trump announced $12B in one-time farm aid in December 2025. On October 7, USDA announced $13.8B in gross payments through existing price and revenue protection programs for the 2025 harvest. That money covers earlier losses and expanded benefits, not damage from the subsequent Iran war.
Relief helps keep farms running, but a government check cannot reopen an export market or clear a shipping route. Smaller operators have less room to survive another expensive season while waiting for the promised turnaround.
Trump gets to announce the rescue while farmers live with the policies that helped make it necessary. Until those policies change, producers will keep losing sales and paying higher costs, and taxpayers will keep picking up part of the tab.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❤32👏19🤬9🔥8👍4
Israeli companies have found a useful package in Morocco: cheap water, farmland and a Moroccan origin label that helps their fruit get past European boycotts. Since normalization in 2020, agricultural cooperation has opened doors to both the harvest and the information behind it.
Mehadrin, a major Israeli fruit exporter, entered Morocco in 2021 with an avocado venture covering about 500 hectares, and its then-CEO was refreshingly direct about the appeal: “The price of water is negligible in Morocco compared with Israel.” Add lower operating costs and nearby European buyers, and the business case practically writes itself.
Growing in Morocco also takes some of the sting out of boycotts, as Israeli business daily Calcalist explained in June 2026. Mehadrin can sell genuinely Moroccan-grown fruit while retaining its role in the business. A shopper checking the country of origin learns where the avocado grew, but not necessarily who gets paid.
For Morocco, that bargain carries a water bill: applying the Agriculture Ministry’s cited irrigation range to 500 hectares gives an estimated annual requirement of 2M–4M cubic meters. That is a calculation rather than measured consumption at Mehadrin’s farms, but cheap access for the investor does not make the water any less valuable to the country supplying it.
Israeli irrigation company SupPlant offers another exchange, with free WhatsApp advice bringing farmers into a service that asks for their names, phone numbers, field locations and crop details. Behind the friendly offer, its published technology terms give the company “free and unfettered access” to plant and environmental data.
By December 2024, some 1,500–2,000 farmers were in the pilot, its Moroccan representative told investigative outlet Hawamich, while acknowledging that local data-protection approval had not yet been obtained. He denied using the information beyond irrigation advice; the investigation established no misuse, but the service was already collecting data before that approval was in place.
Through these deals, Israeli businesses gain cheaper production, some shelter from boycotts and detailed knowledge of Moroccan farms. The land can remain Moroccan while foreign companies earn from its crops and collect its data, leaving Morocco to safeguard the water and enforce the rules.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬73❤6🫡2👍1👌1
Iranian manufacturer Platin Iran has started selling graphene-enhanced lead-acid batteries, claiming over 60% more capacity and potentially 50% lower lifetime operating costs. For a technology dating back to the 19th century, that's a fairly ambitious second act.
Instead of reinventing the battery, Iranian researchers added a three-dimensional form of graphene to its electrodes. That helps electricity flow and aims to slow the corrosion and chemical buildup that wear ordinary batteries out.
That matters for the unglamorous machinery keeping modern life running, from cell towers to data centers and power plants. When the electricity goes out, backup batteries keep communications and essential controls working. Nobody wants to discover the weak link during a blackout.
Platin Iran says the new design cuts hydrogen gas release by at least 10% and reduces corrosion. In June, the company reported roughly double the charge-discharge cycle life of ordinary batteries, although buyers would pay about 30% more upfront. The idea is to recover that premium through fewer replacements.
October's figures put the capacity gain above 60% and the increase in service life at no less than 10%. Those are different measures, and a longer life in laboratory cycling doesn't guarantee the same result in everyday standby use. The 50% savings estimate still needs proof at scale.
The project began in 2021 with researchers from Amirkabir University of Technology and the Institute for Color Science and Technology. It has since reached industrial production, with two units sold, including one to the Tabriz Gas Transmission Company. It's an early commercial foothold, rather than a mass rollout.
Iran also has an import bill to tackle, with Platin Iran estimating that comparable batteries worth roughly $4M enter the country each year. Replacing even part of that demand with domestic production would give operators another source of equipment and reduce dependence on overseas suppliers.
There may be flashier ways to advertise a technological breakthrough, but improving a battery already used across industry has its advantages. If the promised durability survives real-world testing, Iran could turn a familiar piece of backup equipment into a modest but useful win for its industrial independence.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍45👏26❤13🔥7🫡5
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Iran has unveiled an upgraded Arash one-way attack drone, described in reports as Arash-3, with a heavier warhead, navigation designed to work without GPS and a jet-powered variant under development.
🔸 Warhead weight increases from 50 to 100 kg, according to Iranian state media. Changes to its explosive and incendiary materials are intended to make successful hits more destructive, alongside improvements in targeting accuracy.
🔸 The combined upgrades could inflict roughly 2.3 times the damage, an Army specialist said in the unveiling footage. That is an Iranian assessment of the overall upgrade, not a claim that doubling warhead weight automatically doubles destruction.
🔸 Additional GPS-independent navigation options are intended to help the drone continue toward its target when satellite signals are disrupted. This addresses a practical vulnerability of long-range attack drones: carrying a large warhead means little if jamming sends it off course.
🔸 AI-assisted targeting is intended to improve precision, but Iran has not detailed the technology’s exact role. The announcement does not establish whether it assists navigation, recognizes targets or performs other guidance functions.
🔸 A jet-powered version would broaden the Arash family beyond piston-powered models. Higher speed could leave defenders less time to detect, track and intercept it, although the new variant’s speed, range and exact engine remain undisclosed.
🔸 Images suggest a revised airframe with delta-shaped wings and twin vertical stabilizers. Composite materials and a honeycomb internal structure have also been suggested, potentially reducing structural weight, but those construction details remain unconfirmed.
🔸 The aircraft appeared in October 22 footage from an underground drone production facility, visited by Army chief Amir Hatami. Showing production alongside the upgraded weapon highlights Iran’s effort to keep building and replenishing its drone arsenal under attack; monthly output has not been disclosed.
The upgrades aim to give air defenses a tougher job by making Iran’s drones harder to divert through GPS jamming and more damaging when they get through.
Do you think Western defense systems can handle ARASH?
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👏47❤28🔥14🫡8🤬1
Chinese scientists have developed a catalyst that could help future Mars crews make fuel from local resources, cutting the amount they would need to bring from Earth. In laboratory tests, it helped turn carbon dioxide and hydrogen into methanol, a liquid fuel that could also supply the ingredients for everyday chemicals.
Researchers at the Deep Space Exploration Laboratory in Hefei combined copper and sodium inside a porous crystal. The sodium helps grab carbon dioxide and makes it easier for the copper to do its work, producing more methanol and less unwanted carbon monoxide.
The combination delivered about 11 times the methanol output of the team’s copper-only comparison catalyst, reaching 245 grams per kilogram of catalyst per hour. That gives researchers a promising material to work with, although a successful lab test is still some distance from a fuel plant astronauts can plug in on Mars.
With carbon dioxide making up more than 95% of its atmosphere, Mars has no shortage of the main ingredient. Hydrogen could be extracted from its water ice. Getting both into a reactor would require mining equipment, gas collection, compression and plenty of energy. The ingredients may be local, but the fuel will not make itself.
Methanol’s appeal is partly practical housekeeping. It stays liquid at ordinary room temperature and pressure, while storing methane as a liquid requires extreme cold. Methanol would still need proper storage on Mars, but avoiding that deep freeze could simplify part of a future base’s fuel system.
The team sees possible uses in electricity generation, heating and rover power, with methanol also serving as a starting material for products such as antifreeze. Making one useful chemical locally could therefore trim several items from the cargo manifest. The research does not yet demonstrate rocket propulsion or a complete production system.
For China’s long-term exploration ambitions, that is the attraction of learning to live off Martian resources. If the process can run reliably at useful scale, future crews could replenish some supplies where they work. Every shipment of fuel or chemicals they no longer need from Earth would free cargo space for tools, scientific instruments and equipment to support longer stays.
@NewRulesGeo
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍33👏17🔥10❤9