This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🇮🇱🇵🇸 Direct shootings by israeli terrorists at children in Gaza
A new investigation by the English BBC shows that during the genocide in Gaza, more than 160 cases of targeted attacks on children by israeli terrorists have been recorded.
🔗
➡️ Join us! | @MyLordBebo
A new investigation by the English BBC shows that during the genocide in Gaza, more than 160 cases of targeted attacks on children by israeli terrorists have been recorded.
🔗
➡️ Join us! | @MyLordBebo
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Did you know that Israelis are able to jump the queue for organ donation if they fly to the United States? And that, yes, the US taxpayer subsidizes it all?
Well, now you do
https://gab.com/NeonRevolt/posts/114967346339119783
Well, now you do
https://gab.com/NeonRevolt/posts/114967346339119783
What's wrong with the PARK AVENUE SHOOTING?
Fake crime scene photos, Pam Bondi finally takes action, and RFK Jr gets sued by his own organization.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Akk8Kh6gyCs
Fake crime scene photos, Pam Bondi finally takes action, and RFK Jr gets sued by his own organization.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Akk8Kh6gyCs
Forwarded from The Solari Report
You can now listen to Hijacking Bitcoin: The Hidden History of BTC with Steve Patterson on Spotify
With Roger Ver, Patterson co-authored Hijacking Bitcoin: The Hidden History of BTC, and as I noted in my recent review, it is the only book I have read that displays a full understanding of BTC’s original potential as well as its conversion into a vehicle that, in my opinion, is designed to serve as a “pump-and-dump” mechanism and tool to further the control grid.
Listen here: https://open.spotify.com/episode/4NI9gQhMz18615VKczXm8o?si=a7625cdc56004d3e
With Roger Ver, Patterson co-authored Hijacking Bitcoin: The Hidden History of BTC, and as I noted in my recent review, it is the only book I have read that displays a full understanding of BTC’s original potential as well as its conversion into a vehicle that, in my opinion, is designed to serve as a “pump-and-dump” mechanism and tool to further the control grid.
Listen here: https://open.spotify.com/episode/4NI9gQhMz18615VKczXm8o?si=a7625cdc56004d3e
“We Were ORDERED To Stand Down On October 7th!” – IOF terrorist (16:33)
https://old.bitchute.com/video/yzkp7s7kdjb3/
#oct7 #falseflag
https://old.bitchute.com/video/yzkp7s7kdjb3/
#oct7 #falseflag
🇪🇺⚖️ The European Court of Justice (CJEU) banned migrant deportations!
In a groundbreaking ruling, the CJEU prohibits national government from deporting migrants to their home country or 3rd party 'safe' countries unless national governments follow a complex procedure with criteria set by the European Union.
The criteria for declaring a country 'safe' for deportations that the CJEU wants to be respected means that national governments must look whether or not the person they want to deport can "assert his or her rights effectively" and the information for that must be made available for judicial review meaning that deportation orders will be subject to censure by a judge who can decide to override that order and stop the deportation if the judge considers the country unsafe.
If a EU country would like to deport Arab migrants back to the Middle East, the authoritarian governments in the region may be sufficient grounds (denial of the right of freedom of expression or freedom of assembly), after this decision, to stop the deportation altogether, no matter if the migrant on the deportation list is a danger to society or not.
The ruling of the CJEU cannot be appealed nor overturned.
🔗 https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2025-08/cp250103en.pdf
In a groundbreaking ruling, the CJEU prohibits national government from deporting migrants to their home country or 3rd party 'safe' countries unless national governments follow a complex procedure with criteria set by the European Union.
The criteria for declaring a country 'safe' for deportations that the CJEU wants to be respected means that national governments must look whether or not the person they want to deport can "assert his or her rights effectively" and the information for that must be made available for judicial review meaning that deportation orders will be subject to censure by a judge who can decide to override that order and stop the deportation if the judge considers the country unsafe.
If a EU country would like to deport Arab migrants back to the Middle East, the authoritarian governments in the region may be sufficient grounds (denial of the right of freedom of expression or freedom of assembly), after this decision, to stop the deportation altogether, no matter if the migrant on the deportation list is a danger to society or not.
The ruling of the CJEU cannot be appealed nor overturned.
🔗 https://curia.europa.eu/jcms/upload/docs/application/pdf/2025-08/cp250103en.pdf
Forwarded from Eva Karene Bartlett (Yeva)
Hassan Mafi
"Those who did this to Gaza are trying to convince you that people hate them for their religion."
"Those who did this to Gaza are trying to convince you that people hate them for their religion."