This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Fake #Artemis II mission.
Forwarded from Fearless John - @European_dissident
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
βΎChilling footage from South Lebanon: Over the span of a month, Israeli forces have totally flattened the village of Khiam. What used to be a thriving hillside town is now just 100% gray rubble.
βΎFollow:
https://t.me/European_dissident
βΎFollow:
https://t.me/European_dissident
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Russian weapons designers have created an AI-powered robotic sniper.
The "Dvoynik" robotic sniper system can be used in remote-control mode as well as in an autonomous mode, where the AI ββperforms most of the work.
It can also be used in both stationary and mobile platforms, providing tremendous mobility. Furthermore, the system is equipped with high-speed quasi-hypersonic rounds, allowing it to destroy enemy drones with ease.
@RussianBaZa
The "Dvoynik" robotic sniper system can be used in remote-control mode as well as in an autonomous mode, where the AI ββperforms most of the work.
It can also be used in both stationary and mobile platforms, providing tremendous mobility. Furthermore, the system is equipped with high-speed quasi-hypersonic rounds, allowing it to destroy enemy drones with ease.
@RussianBaZa
jewish Nepotism
disgraced #Epstein BFF
Larry #Summers is why
Sam #Altman is still in
charge of #OpenAI after
the coup
@OccupiedTimes
disgraced #Epstein BFF
Larry #Summers is why
Sam #Altman is still in
charge of #OpenAI after
the coup
@OccupiedTimes
Forwarded from Pavel Durov (Pavel Durov)
Group admins can assign tags to users β or embrace the chaos and let them assign their own. π₯
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Forwarded from Pavel Durov (Pavel Durov)
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Ask the devs of the services you use to support it
https://core.telegram.org/bots/features#managed-bots
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
#Google shoehorned #Rust into #Pixel 10 #modem to make legacy code safer, allegedly
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/google-shoehorned-rust-into-pixel-10-modem-to-make-legacy-code-safer/
https://arstechnica.com/gadgets/2026/04/google-shoehorned-rust-into-pixel-10-modem-to-make-legacy-code-safer/
Ars Technica
Google shoehorned Rust into Pixel 10 modem to make legacy code safer
Cellular modems are complex black boxes of legacy code, but Google is making them safer with Rust.
Forwarded from TheTruthAddict π΄ (Joel Walbert)
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Age/ID Verification & The Me-Me Mind Virus
and why we will never 'win'
https://github.com/BryanLunduke/DoesItAgeVerify
https://agelesslinux.org/distros.html
https://thetruthaddict.substack.com/p/ageid-verification-and-the-me-me
and why we will never 'win'
https://github.com/BryanLunduke/DoesItAgeVerify
https://agelesslinux.org/distros.html
https://thetruthaddict.substack.com/p/ageid-verification-and-the-me-me
On April 24 we'll start using GitHub Copilot interaction data for AI model training unless you opt out. Review this update and manage your preferences in your GitHub account settings.
^
https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/updates-to-github-copilot-interaction-data-usage-policy/
https://github.com/settings/copilot/features
#GitHub #microslop
I JUST SUED THE TORONTO STAR FOR FAILING TO PUBLICLY REVEAL INFORMATION SHARED BY THE RCMP RE: JUSTIN #TRUDEAU AND UNDERAGE PORN
After much reflection, I finally decided to begin my litigation process related to events arising from the experiences I wrote about in 'In Trudeau's Kitchen'. I'm not even talking about the more specific details/consequences I shared in 'In Trudeau's Kitchen.' (i.e. how the Star may have been negligent with respect to not telling my story). Those will be explored soon. I'm talking about the bigger picture consequences of media not sharing important details about political leadership with the citizenry. Oh, how we suffer in their absence.
In this case, I begin with something shared with me (2021) by then Toronto Star Journalist Robert Cribb, to the effect that the RCMP had informed them that then Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was watching kiddie porn (underage porn) on his devices. It was their job to witness him, in order to ensure his devices weren't compromised by a foreign power. When asked (2022) if this story was going to go public, Cribb confirmed that the original source was credible, and affirmed that the story was coming ('where there's smoke, there's fire.'). It never came, and I believe it should have. I have struggled with this, and various other things shared with me by media, for a long time.
At the link below is the filing itself, for anyone interested in following the story. It is for the court to decide, but it is my view that the Star, particularly in a situation where they are receiving funds from the government, had a fiduciary duty to bring this information to the Canadian public. It is surely in the public interest, and sharing it may well have made a huge difference with respect to cultivating the best outcome for Canadians. I explain more of my view in the documents. @dkennedyglans @MelanieBennet_ @TheMenzoid @ezralevant @scoopercooper @CandiceMalcolm @DavidKrayden @RealAndyLeeShow @LichTamara @JaneBrownNews @AlexpiersonAMP @cbcwatcher
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/2bywhzf0gl5f5b305ernq/SC-26-00004371-0000-Documents-1.pdf?rlkey=04ub2qlsaiaeho38nz9wcqclk&e=1&st=vaziccsd&dl=0
JeffBrownEnreal / π
#fjt #Canada
After much reflection, I finally decided to begin my litigation process related to events arising from the experiences I wrote about in 'In Trudeau's Kitchen'. I'm not even talking about the more specific details/consequences I shared in 'In Trudeau's Kitchen.' (i.e. how the Star may have been negligent with respect to not telling my story). Those will be explored soon. I'm talking about the bigger picture consequences of media not sharing important details about political leadership with the citizenry. Oh, how we suffer in their absence.
In this case, I begin with something shared with me (2021) by then Toronto Star Journalist Robert Cribb, to the effect that the RCMP had informed them that then Prime Minister Justin Trudeau was watching kiddie porn (underage porn) on his devices. It was their job to witness him, in order to ensure his devices weren't compromised by a foreign power. When asked (2022) if this story was going to go public, Cribb confirmed that the original source was credible, and affirmed that the story was coming ('where there's smoke, there's fire.'). It never came, and I believe it should have. I have struggled with this, and various other things shared with me by media, for a long time.
At the link below is the filing itself, for anyone interested in following the story. It is for the court to decide, but it is my view that the Star, particularly in a situation where they are receiving funds from the government, had a fiduciary duty to bring this information to the Canadian public. It is surely in the public interest, and sharing it may well have made a huge difference with respect to cultivating the best outcome for Canadians. I explain more of my view in the documents. @dkennedyglans @MelanieBennet_ @TheMenzoid @ezralevant @scoopercooper @CandiceMalcolm @DavidKrayden @RealAndyLeeShow @LichTamara @JaneBrownNews @AlexpiersonAMP @cbcwatcher
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/2bywhzf0gl5f5b305ernq/SC-26-00004371-0000-Documents-1.pdf?rlkey=04ub2qlsaiaeho38nz9wcqclk&e=1&st=vaziccsd&dl=0
JeffBrownEnreal / π
#fjt #Canada
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
ICYMI - OpenAI's Sam Altman warns that the next AI models could be misused by terrorist groups to create novel pathogens, "that's no longer a theoretical thing, or it's not going to be for much longer," and agrees that there could be a "world shaking cyber attack this year."
@disclosetv
@disclosetv
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
β‘οΈ Pete Hegseth quoted a fake Bible verse from Pulp Fiction during a Pentagon sermon.
Forwarded from ππ πππππ πΌπ©πππ₯ππ₯ππ (_ScalpS_)
There is a global concerted effort ongoing right now to erase anonymity online because the free internet puts power mongers at risk.
Without anonymity, governments can find dissenters and problems early and nip them in the bud.
Doxxing will become an even bigger problem than it already is.
It will make arrests and firings a walk in the park.
Anonymity allows whistleblowers to speak, allows dissidents to organize, and creates a true marketplace of ideas.
During the COVID era discussions in academia were shut down and moved online where professionals could discuss trends and data without risk of persecution or firing. In some cases in Europe and Australia, professionals faced legal ramifications for speaking up.
The rise of the dissident right in 2016 and its continuance has it's roots in online discussion. After years of manipulated Overton window shifts, the dissident right appeared to counter these shifts as well as a counter to the established right. These discussions were and sometimes still are dangerous to careers and entire livelihoods. Anonymity allows these discussions to be had.
Governments do not operate morally and will pretend this is all done to "protect the children" but in reality it's a power grab to stop dissent in the future.
There is AMPLE evidence of the US government and other governments doing this in the past.
"Through counterintelligence it should be possible to pinpoint potential troublemakers and neutralize them"
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/8250/all-info
https://x.com/spikesguides/status/2044766352120938828
Without anonymity, governments can find dissenters and problems early and nip them in the bud.
Doxxing will become an even bigger problem than it already is.
It will make arrests and firings a walk in the park.
Anonymity allows whistleblowers to speak, allows dissidents to organize, and creates a true marketplace of ideas.
During the COVID era discussions in academia were shut down and moved online where professionals could discuss trends and data without risk of persecution or firing. In some cases in Europe and Australia, professionals faced legal ramifications for speaking up.
The rise of the dissident right in 2016 and its continuance has it's roots in online discussion. After years of manipulated Overton window shifts, the dissident right appeared to counter these shifts as well as a counter to the established right. These discussions were and sometimes still are dangerous to careers and entire livelihoods. Anonymity allows these discussions to be had.
Governments do not operate morally and will pretend this is all done to "protect the children" but in reality it's a power grab to stop dissent in the future.
There is AMPLE evidence of the US government and other governments doing this in the past.
"Through counterintelligence it should be possible to pinpoint potential troublemakers and neutralize them"
https://www.congress.gov/bill/119th-congress/house-bill/8250/all-info
https://x.com/spikesguides/status/2044766352120938828