Forwarded from Amanda
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
OMG COMPILATION OF THE DEAD AND DYING FROM THE COVID VACCINATIONS VIDEO 19. - https://old.bitchute.com/video/KIFOaHPA3Ocv/
Forwarded from Amanda
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dr. Francis Boyle human rights lawyers, working in the field of bio weapons died suddenly
Forwarded from Died Suddenly Worldwide
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Journalist Sharyl Attkisson reports on sworn testimony from Dr. Andrew Zimmerman, a world-renowned pediatric neurologist who served as the U.S. government’s top expert witness in vaccine court. After publicly denying any link for years, Dr. Zimmerman later stated—under oath—that vaccines can cause regressive autism in a small subset of children, and that he privately told government lawyers this during federal proceedings.
The report explores allegations that this opinion was suppressed, the structure of the U.S. vaccine injury court, the role of pharmaceutical lobbying, and firsthand accounts from families, physicians, and members of Congress who say efforts to investigate vaccine injury were blocked.
CDC refused to be interviewed
Follow: @diedsuddenlyworldwide
The report explores allegations that this opinion was suppressed, the structure of the U.S. vaccine injury court, the role of pharmaceutical lobbying, and firsthand accounts from families, physicians, and members of Congress who say efforts to investigate vaccine injury were blocked.
CDC refused to be interviewed
Follow: @diedsuddenlyworldwide
Forwarded from Died Suddenly Worldwide
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Katie Miller: "My oldest child is fully vaccinated. My youngest child is not vaccinated at all. My oldest child had a milk soy protein allergy… My third child… never ever gets sick."
Jenny McCarthy: "This is what I've heard… over the past 15 years."
Follow: @diedsuddenlyworldwide
Jenny McCarthy: "This is what I've heard… over the past 15 years."
Follow: @diedsuddenlyworldwide
Forwarded from Died Suddenly Worldwide
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Child Traffickers were in charge of all ‘Science’…
Robert Maxwell headed the Scientific Journal System that controlled ‘Science’ for decades.
Bill Gates invested $10M in ResearchGate…that has 25 MILLION members.
Epstein and Gates decided what research got amplified…
Follow: @diedsuddenlyworldwide
Robert Maxwell headed the Scientific Journal System that controlled ‘Science’ for decades.
Bill Gates invested $10M in ResearchGate…that has 25 MILLION members.
Epstein and Gates decided what research got amplified…
Follow: @diedsuddenlyworldwide
Forwarded from Fiona Rose Diamond (Fiona CoviLeaks)
A ruling on today’s appeal in Amsterdam, (in the case against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla (CEO of Pfizer), former Dutch PM, media and health ministers) will be delivered on 9th April 2026. The decision will determine whether the high court will allow the district court to hear expert witness testimony from Dr Mike Yeadon (former Pfizer VP), Sasha Latypova (former Pharma executive and researcher), Katherine Watt (international law expert and legal analyst), Catherine Austin Fitts (financial analyst and former US government official), and Dr Joseph Sansone (clinical psychologist) in a preliminary pre-trial evidence hearing ahead of the main civil case. That civil trial - brought by seven Pfizer 'vaccine'-injured claimants - is currently expected to take place sometime between May and October 2026, though no exact date has yet been set.
Today’s hearing was not about deciding the case itself. It was about whether the court should allow an appeal against the refusal to examine key evidence and expert witnesses before trial. The main lawsuit will proceed regardless of the outcome - but if the appeal succeeds, it kicks the door wide open to early scrutiny of the evidence… and disclosure from the defendants. If it fails, the claimants may still present those experts later during the normal trial process.
Good litigators, like Peter Stassen (pictured in the blue suit) don’t walk into court with one argument and hope for the best - they attack from every possible angle. You build multiple legal pathways, so the case can’t simply be shut down with a single ruling. If one argument falls, another survives. It forces the court to engage with the evidence, makes early dismissal harder, and compels disclosure, witnesses and scrutiny. In complex cases involving governments, corporations and media, each party has different legal duties, so the case must be constructed broadly. It’s not chaos - it’s strategy.
That’s what serious litigation looks like when the stakes are high!
Lawyer Peter Stassen was an absolute rottweiler (but clear humanitarian) in court. He held nothing back, stated that Bill Gates was a “satanist in the Epstein files,” “protected by black cloaks” and that he should be charged as a criminal. He argued the global significance of this case and is pushing relentlessly for the right to bring expert evidence before the court. He made it clear he intends to pursue this case from every possible legal angle, and that he will not stop until that evidence is heard.
There are essentially two connected cases here. Today’s hearing concerned a preliminary evidentiary procedure, filed after the main lawsuit. Both cases involve the same defendants, the same facts, and the same legal team, representing seven Pfizer vaccine-injured claimants. I'll be sharing the full transcript and overview in English tomorrow morning across my socials.
There is one ultimate objective: justice, accountability, and truth.
I will leave you with what Peter Stassen left the court Justices with: “You, your honours, will have to decide who are the children of God in this room, and who are the children of the Devil.”
@FionaRoseDiamond
Today’s hearing was not about deciding the case itself. It was about whether the court should allow an appeal against the refusal to examine key evidence and expert witnesses before trial. The main lawsuit will proceed regardless of the outcome - but if the appeal succeeds, it kicks the door wide open to early scrutiny of the evidence… and disclosure from the defendants. If it fails, the claimants may still present those experts later during the normal trial process.
Good litigators, like Peter Stassen (pictured in the blue suit) don’t walk into court with one argument and hope for the best - they attack from every possible angle. You build multiple legal pathways, so the case can’t simply be shut down with a single ruling. If one argument falls, another survives. It forces the court to engage with the evidence, makes early dismissal harder, and compels disclosure, witnesses and scrutiny. In complex cases involving governments, corporations and media, each party has different legal duties, so the case must be constructed broadly. It’s not chaos - it’s strategy.
That’s what serious litigation looks like when the stakes are high!
Lawyer Peter Stassen was an absolute rottweiler (but clear humanitarian) in court. He held nothing back, stated that Bill Gates was a “satanist in the Epstein files,” “protected by black cloaks” and that he should be charged as a criminal. He argued the global significance of this case and is pushing relentlessly for the right to bring expert evidence before the court. He made it clear he intends to pursue this case from every possible legal angle, and that he will not stop until that evidence is heard.
There are essentially two connected cases here. Today’s hearing concerned a preliminary evidentiary procedure, filed after the main lawsuit. Both cases involve the same defendants, the same facts, and the same legal team, representing seven Pfizer vaccine-injured claimants. I'll be sharing the full transcript and overview in English tomorrow morning across my socials.
There is one ultimate objective: justice, accountability, and truth.
I will leave you with what Peter Stassen left the court Justices with: “You, your honours, will have to decide who are the children of God in this room, and who are the children of the Devil.”
@FionaRoseDiamond
👏1
Forwarded from Dr. Paul Marik
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
World-renowned oncologist Dr. Angus Dalgleish exposes the horrifying rise of turbo cancers linked to experimental mRNA injections pushed by Fauci and Gates. These were never vaccines — they were unsafe gene therapies. Now children are at risk, and justice must follow.
They called it science. They promised safety. They silenced dissent. Now, the truth is bleeding through the cracks.
Join 👉 @DrPaulMarik
They called it science. They promised safety. They silenced dissent. Now, the truth is bleeding through the cracks.
Join 👉 @DrPaulMarik
🙏1
Forwarded from Dr. Paul Marik
Remember Dr. Andreas Noack, graphene expert? He said graphene hydroxide in the COVID shots acts like nanoscale razors on blood vessels. He was arrested during a livestream at home and died hours later leaving a pregnant partner behind.
Join 👉 @DrPaulMarik
Join 👉 @DrPaulMarik
Forwarded from Dr. Paul Marik
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Colorado just introduced a bill that creates a legal presumption that properly administered vaccines do not cause injury or death.
They didn't say "rarely cause" or "sometimes cause." The legal presumption is that they do not cause injury or death. Ever.
This is written into law in a state where the vaccine package inserts (the ones wrapped around the products themselves) list death and injury as known outcomes every single year.
The bill also authorizes pharmacists to independently prescribe vaccines. without a physician or oversight - just hand it over.
Del's question is the right one: why stop at vaccines?
Why not just declare all pharmaceuticals 100% safe and strip liability across the board? What exactly is the legal or scientific distinction? Vaccines contain live viruses, bacteria, adjuvants, plasmids, and, in the case of mRNA products, technology that interacts with your genetic material. By any measure, that's a more invasive intervention than most drugs on the market, and most drugs still carry liability.
The only thing keeping any pharmaceutical product from becoming whatever manufacturers want it to be is the ability of injured people to sue.
Colorado is quietly moving to end that, while the rest of the country is waking up.
Pay attention to what's happening at the state level.
This is where the fight is right now.
Join 👉 @DrPaulMarik
They didn't say "rarely cause" or "sometimes cause." The legal presumption is that they do not cause injury or death. Ever.
This is written into law in a state where the vaccine package inserts (the ones wrapped around the products themselves) list death and injury as known outcomes every single year.
The bill also authorizes pharmacists to independently prescribe vaccines. without a physician or oversight - just hand it over.
Del's question is the right one: why stop at vaccines?
Why not just declare all pharmaceuticals 100% safe and strip liability across the board? What exactly is the legal or scientific distinction? Vaccines contain live viruses, bacteria, adjuvants, plasmids, and, in the case of mRNA products, technology that interacts with your genetic material. By any measure, that's a more invasive intervention than most drugs on the market, and most drugs still carry liability.
The only thing keeping any pharmaceutical product from becoming whatever manufacturers want it to be is the ability of injured people to sue.
Colorado is quietly moving to end that, while the rest of the country is waking up.
Pay attention to what's happening at the state level.
This is where the fight is right now.
Join 👉 @DrPaulMarik
Forwarded from Dr. Paul Marik
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Covid 'Vaccine' Safety Trials: Corruption & Fraud~@SenRonJohnsonUS
- Placebo groups SECRETLY VACCINATED—NO safety data EVER!
- MORE DEATHS in vax group—BURIED to hide the truth!
- 'Trials' as short as 48 HOURS—passed off as 'extensive testing.'
Join 👉 @DrPaulMarik
- Placebo groups SECRETLY VACCINATED—NO safety data EVER!
- MORE DEATHS in vax group—BURIED to hide the truth!
- 'Trials' as short as 48 HOURS—passed off as 'extensive testing.'
Join 👉 @DrPaulMarik
Forwarded from Dr. Paul Marik
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
30% of the UK rejected this vaccine. This is the same number as in America, and the same number worldwide. Under the heaviest propaganda campaign in human history - under job threats, social pressure, guilt, and isolation - 30% of the world said no and held the line.
We think of 30% as a small number. It isn't. There is zero apathy in that 30%. Every single one of those people made a hard, conscious, costly decision, and they made it completely alone, with no idea their neighbor was doing the exact same thing.
That was the only thing that beat us. We weren't talking to each other.
The employees who stood together as the 30% and said "we walk out if you force this" kept their jobs. Every one of them.
Now think about the 70% who got it. How many of them actually believed in it? How many just broke under the pressure? At least half, I'd bet. Which means 50% of this world never wanted that vaccine.
They didn't win because they were right. They won because they made us feel alone.
You were never alone. You just didn't know it.
Start talking. You are the change.
Join 👉 @DrPaulMarik
We think of 30% as a small number. It isn't. There is zero apathy in that 30%. Every single one of those people made a hard, conscious, costly decision, and they made it completely alone, with no idea their neighbor was doing the exact same thing.
That was the only thing that beat us. We weren't talking to each other.
The employees who stood together as the 30% and said "we walk out if you force this" kept their jobs. Every one of them.
Now think about the 70% who got it. How many of them actually believed in it? How many just broke under the pressure? At least half, I'd bet. Which means 50% of this world never wanted that vaccine.
They didn't win because they were right. They won because they made us feel alone.
You were never alone. You just didn't know it.
Start talking. You are the change.
Join 👉 @DrPaulMarik
Forwarded from Dr. Paul Marik
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Genomics expert Kevin Mckernan discovered SIGNIFICANT amounts of Pfizer vaccine DNA sequences in colon cancer tissue from a patient who received 4 Pfizer shots.
A person fully vaccinated with 4 Pfizer doses developed aggressive colon cancer just 1 year later and died within 30 days of the diagnosis.
Three biopsies 2 pre-death and one post-mortem were analyzed specifically for the vaccine sequences.
The results showed significant amounts of Pfizer-derived DNA present in the tumor samples, far more than anticipated and inconsistent with trace contamination alone!
Join 👉 @DrPaulMarik
A person fully vaccinated with 4 Pfizer doses developed aggressive colon cancer just 1 year later and died within 30 days of the diagnosis.
Three biopsies 2 pre-death and one post-mortem were analyzed specifically for the vaccine sequences.
The results showed significant amounts of Pfizer-derived DNA present in the tumor samples, far more than anticipated and inconsistent with trace contamination alone!
Join 👉 @DrPaulMarik
❤1
Forwarded from Dr. Paul Marik
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
“They were all in on it…I’d like to chase Fauci…that little Bastard out of his office…” -Dr. Kary Mullis on the HIV Pandemic
His PCR test was being used fraudulently during HIV. Planning a ‘Pandemic’ requires a test to create fake cases…which was also used for ‘Covid’.
Join 👉 @DrPaulMarik
His PCR test was being used fraudulently during HIV. Planning a ‘Pandemic’ requires a test to create fake cases…which was also used for ‘Covid’.
Join 👉 @DrPaulMarik
Forwarded from Dr. Paul Marik
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
If there’s one word to describe the experience of the vaccine-injured, it’s “ABANDONMENT,” Dr. Joel Wallskog says.
After developing a rare neurological condition, a top vaccine official told him he would “get back” to him repeatedly for two years.
He never did.
His name was Peter Marks.
He ignored the suffering of vaccine-injured patients who begged him for help—then MOCKED them behind closed doors.
After fast-tracking COVID jab approvals, Marks left his government position for a handsome salary at Eli Lilly as its new head of infectious disease research.
The media framed his departure from “government service” as a defiant “hero” standing up to RFK Jr.’s takeover of HHS.
But here’s the Peter Marks story they’re not telling you.
It’s not pretty.
Join 👉 @DrPaulMarik
After developing a rare neurological condition, a top vaccine official told him he would “get back” to him repeatedly for two years.
He never did.
His name was Peter Marks.
He ignored the suffering of vaccine-injured patients who begged him for help—then MOCKED them behind closed doors.
After fast-tracking COVID jab approvals, Marks left his government position for a handsome salary at Eli Lilly as its new head of infectious disease research.
The media framed his departure from “government service” as a defiant “hero” standing up to RFK Jr.’s takeover of HHS.
But here’s the Peter Marks story they’re not telling you.
It’s not pretty.
Join 👉 @DrPaulMarik