Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi; A True Hero Who Stood Up For Our Children.

One of the few doctors who was brave enough to stand by his oath.
He warned us from the very beginning and put his life and reputation aside for the sake of all our children

Today he was vindicated 🙏

Remember His Words of Warning-2021

“If you give that jab to your child you are committing a crime”

@childcovidvaccineinjuriesuk

Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi; They Have Broken Every Rule of The Nuremberg Code

The Nuremberg Code States Anything That Is Being Used Under Experimental Use MUST BE STOPPED If There Is A Clear Indication Of Any Harm or Death
Dr. Sucharit Bhakdi

NUREMBERG CODE NO.10
‘During the course of the experiment the scientist in charge must be prepared to terminate the
experiment at any stage, if he has probable cause to believe, in the exercise of the good faith,
superior skill and careful judgment required of him, that a continuation of the experiment is
likely to result in injury, disability, or death to the experimental subject’

@childcovidvaccineinjuriesuk

Die diesjährige Bilderberger Konferenz

Politiker kungeln wieder im Geheimen mit den Mächtigen
Von Norbert Häring

Die diesjährige Bilderberger Konferenz

https://apolut.net/politiker-kungeln-wieder-im-geheimen-mit-den-maechtigen-von-norbert-haering/

Politicians play in secret again with the powerful
By Norbert Haering

https://apolut.net/politiker-kungeln-wieder-im-geheimen-mit-den-maechtigen-von-norbert-haering/

From the Telegram channel : Queue for brain :
............................................................................................
Wannsee Conference - Part 1

The so-called Wannsee Conference on the "Final Solution to the Jewish Question" took place in this villa on January 20, 1942

75 years ago: The Wannsee Conference From Mass Murder to the Holocaust

"In order to spare the nerves of the murderers, more effective methods were sought."
The Berlin historian Wolfgang Benz:
"In order to spare the nerves of the murderers, people looked for simpler and more effective methods of mass murder and therefore experimented with poison gas in Auschwitz, because it was too laborious and strained the nerves of the SS subordinates too much if they had to kill with submachine guns all day long. "
(...)
During the session, no participant raised fundamental concerns about the mass murder. All of this took place in a relaxed atmosphere, as Adolf Eichmann later recalled in court in Jerusalem.
"The beginning, where everyone was quiet and listened, and then, towards the end, where there was a mix of talking, and the servants handed cognac or other drinks the whole time, not that there was an alcoholic effect. This was an official affair, but not a stiff one, where everyone was quiet and everyone let everyone else speak their minds, but where in the end everything had been mixed up. "
(...)
“The essentials are in the protocol and he left out the non-essentials because he created a kind of reinsurance here by nailing down the state secretaries individually. "
"The politically decisive thing is actually that the Reich Security Main Office involves all state agencies in this mass crime..."
According to historian and director of the memorial Gerhard Schönberner.
“...that practically the entire state apparatus, ie the Ministry of Justice, the Ministry of the Interior, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Ministry of Economic Affairs, the tax offices, all had to do with the disenfranchisement, the robbery and finally the deportation of the Jews. This conference has acquired such a symbolic value for the whole thing, because for the first time you really see all state institutions involved.”

https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/vor-75-jahren-die-wannseekonferenz-vom-massenmord-zum-100.html

From the Telegram channel : Queue for brain.
............................................................................................
Wannsee Conference - Part 2

"A program was made out of mass murder"

"The murder of the Jews becomes the subject of an intergovernmental conference"
Longerich: First of all, you can see that high-ranking representatives of the Nazi state, a number of state secretaries, but also higher SS leaders come together to talk about how the final solution, as it says literally, of the Jewish question could be achieved. That is, the murder of the Jews becomes the subject of an intergovernmental conference. You can see how many different places are involved here. The Foreign Office is involved, the Ministry of the Interior is involved, the Ministry of Justice. It is by no means just a matter that was negotiated internally within the SS.(...)."

https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/die-wannseekonferenz-zur-endloesung-der-judenfrage-aus-100.html

From the Telegram channel : Queue for brain :
............................................................................................
Wannsee Conference - Part 3

A discussion on the division of labor in mass murder

"(...) For me, this makes it particularly clear that it was an administrative assassination, that it was a modern, collaborative approach that was agreed here. You can see that in the language, a legal, objective, euphemistic camouflage language is used to make such a process as mass murder communicable within the administration."
(...)
“There [in the log] it doesn't say anything about killing and destroying, but it says that in the course of the final solution, people will be brought to the East for work. And then it says literally in a subordinate clause, whereby a large part will undoubtedly be lost through natural diminution. And then it goes on to say that any remaining stock must be treated accordingly.”
(...)
“I think it was generally more difficult to name the perpetrators and those responsible than to empathize with the victims. That wasn’t easy either, but post-war society found it difficult to make it clear who the perpetrators were and to name groups of perpetrators who were below the level of Hitler, Himmler and Göring.”
https://www.deutschlandfunk.de/wannseekonferenz-eine-besprechung-zur-arbeitsteilung-beim-100.html

A very important assembly of information, not least of which an incredibly rare comparison of the health status of vaccinated and unvaccinated children.
Best wishes
Mike

https://truth613.substack.com/p/analysis-of-health-outcomes-in-vaccinated

Analyse der gesundheitlichen Folgen bei geimpften und ungeimpften Kindern: Entwicklungsverzögerungen, Asthma, Ohrenentzündungen und Magen-Darm-Störungen. Und noch viel mehr.

Der tragische Tod eines drei Monate alten Kindes letzte Woche in Israel, wenige Stunden nach den Routineimpfungen, sollte alle Eltern dazu veranlassen, sich diesen Artikel von Dr. Peter McCullough und die von Dr. Paul Thomas vorgestellten Studien anzusehen.

https://truth613.substack.com/p/analysis-of-health-outcomes-in-vaccinated

EIN KOMMENTAR VOM DR. : MIKE YEADON / ÜBERSETZT :

Eine sehr wichtige Informationssammlung, nicht zuletzt ein unglaublich seltener Vergleich des Gesundheitszustands geimpfter und ungeimpfter Kinder ( https://t.me/robinmg/28240 ).

...
https://truth613.substack.com/p/analysis-of-health-outcomes-in-vaccinated

...
https://truth613.substack.com/p/analysis-of-health-outcomes-in-vaccinated

...
https://truth613.substack.com/p/analysis-of-health-outcomes-in-vaccinated

Der kroatische EU-Parlamentarier Mislav Kolakusic erklärt die WHO öffentlich zur TERRORISTISCHEN Organisation (VIDEO)

Meiner Meinung nach, stellt eine gut überlegte Wortwahl eine gute Waffe zur Überzeugung der Gesellschaft dar. Mislav Kolakusic scheint dies gelernt zu haben. Ich bin zwar kein Kommunikationswissenschaftler, aber habe schon viel über die Wirkung der Texte nachgedacht. Solche Worte wirken gut ! Besonders dann, wenn das Wahrheitsgehalt inzwischen als bewiesen gilt. Dies nochmal gerichtlich zu klären, wäre vielleicht vorteilhaft ?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/05/croatian-eu-parliamentarian-mislav-kolakusic-publicly-declares-who/

Croatian EU Parliamentarian Mislav Kolakusic Publicly Declares WHO a TERRORIST Organization (VIDEO)

In my opinion, a well-considered choice of words is a good weapon to convince society. Mislav Kolakusic seems to have learned this. I'm not a communication scientist, but I've thought a lot about the impact of the texts. Such words work well ! Especially when the truth content is now considered proven. Clarifying this again in court would perhaps be advantageous ?

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/05/croatian-eu-parliamentarian-mislav-kolakusic-publicly-declares-who/

https://www.gatesfoundation.org/ideas/media-center/press-releases/2022/05/gates-foundation-commits-up-to-125-million-covid19-prevent-pandemics

Isn’t it remarkable that the oddly named Global Preparedness Monitoring Board, which was created only in 2018, has yet again got Gates’ fingerprints all over it? His money buys influence as usual.

They claim to have set it up in the wake of an Ebola outbreak in Africa. GPMB is a joint venture between the WHO & the World Bank.

There was the now-expected, yet unremarked & inexplicable statements about “the next pandemic”.

I think it's also important to recognise the work by Sasha Latypova and who uncovered that all the safety trials were an utter sham and FDA and CDC protocols were by-passed and the jabs were introduced onto the market as US Department of Defense prototypes as is done with weapons. https://podcasters.spotify.com/pod/show/rfkjr/episodes/Militarized-Healthcare-with-Sasha-Latypova-e20go74/a-a9ggpt0

Recall Fauci stating bluntly that there would be some kind of public health crisis on Trump’s watch? How the dickens could he possibly know that? Obviously, we know the answer. But why didn’t those who heard Fauci say that no ask such questions?

The membership of the GPMB is limited to big hitters, such as Sir Jeremy Farrar, George Gao (head of China’s equivalent to the US’s CDC, Tony Fauci, Christopher Elias (Gates’ right hand man) & more.

I was prompted to look this entity because it was referenced in an article on Dr Peter McCullough’s Substack.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/the-great-sars-cov-2-charade-chapter-4bf

It ought to have long been obvious even to the TV addicts that Gates’ apparent premonitions were way outside of any reasonable limits for anyone scientifically engaged in this area of biology, let alone someone without even a foundational training in a single one of the many disciplines appropriate to accomplishing the ostensible purpose of whatever he’s latterly into, surely?

Around the same time the GPMB released its first major report, “A World At Risk”, https://www.gpmb.org/annual-reports/overview/item/2019-a-world-at-risk

Gates and others ran a tabletop simulation of, and an incredulously accurate foretelling of the claimed “Respiratory Virus Pandemic”. Event 201 involved all the now-expected suspects in perpetrating this long planned assault upon humanity. https://youtu.be/AoLw-Q8X174

Not news now of course, but literally, “what are the chances???” of selecting for their model global pandemic a novel coronavirus, emerging from China? https://www.gpmb.org/annual-reports/overview/item/2019-a-world-at-risk

How can the combination of astonishingly unlikely events that Gates is ahead of the curve on not trigger derisive laughter? I’m genuinely at a loss to explain how almost everyone does not realise that the reason Gates is so successful at predicting things is because he’s part of a group that are making these things happen?

Shortly after we were informed that a “covid pandemic” was happening, Gates switched to going on endlessly about novel vaccines. It had long been known even then that flu vaccines do not work. They don’t reduce hospitalization and death. Gates & the entire GPMB knew that. It’s not publicised but it’s in several major, peer reviewed journal articles.

Why then could he possibly, in good conscience, pretend that another injected “vaccine” be effective against a notional respiratory “virus” disease?

Even if the pandemic was exactly as they described & even if an honest effort to create a <safe and effective> vaccine, why wouldn’t they anticipate total lack of efficacy of perhaps the most similar treatment to that which doesn’t work for flu-like illnesses?

And because of his Foundation’s investments in vaccines, he would definitely have known about flu vaccines failures. And that to conduct the R&D plus the quality manufacturing implied couldn’t possibly be done in under several years (>>4 years, with a following wind).

Then he was all over TV, telling the world that “things will only get back to normal after we’ve pretty much vaccinated the entire planet”. We’ve never done that, only offering flu vaccines for example to the susceptible (plus the recent & revolting example of jabbing kids with superfluous flu shots.

Help people see how utterly bizarre & obviously fictional is the whole narrative around Gates, “pandemics” & “vaccines”. Please do try, though I know most people don’t want to hear it.

Best wishes
Mike

ÜBERSETZUNG :

Erinnern Sie sich an die unverblümte Aussage von Fauci, dass es unter Trumps Aufsicht zu einer Art Gesundheitskrise kommen würde? Wie zum Teufel konnte er das wissen? Offensichtlich kennen wir die Antwort. Aber warum haben diejenigen, die Fauci hörten, das nicht gesagt, solche Fragen gestellt?

Die Mitgliedschaft im GPMB ist auf große Persönlichkeiten wie Sir Jeremy Farrar, George Gao (Chef von Chinas Äquivalent zum US-amerikanischen CDC), Tony Fauci, Christopher Elias (Gates‘ rechte Hand) und mehr beschränkt.

Ich wurde aufgefordert, mir diese Entität anzusehen, weil in einem Artikel über Dr. Peter McCulloughs Substack darauf verwiesen wurde.

https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/the-great-sars-cov-2-charade-chapter-4bf

Es hätte selbst Fernsehsüchtigen längst klar sein müssen, dass Gates' offensichtliche Vorahnungen weit außerhalb aller vernünftigen Grenzen für jeden lagen, der sich wissenschaftlich mit diesem Bereich der Biologie beschäftigte, ganz zu schweigen von jemandem, der nicht einmal eine Grundausbildung in einer der vielen Disziplinen hatte Sicherlich geeignet, den angeblichen Zweck dessen zu erreichen, worauf er sich in letzter Zeit einlässt?

Etwa zur gleichen Zeit veröffentlichte das GPMB seinen ersten großen Bericht „A World At Risk“, https://www.gpmb.org/annual-reports/overview/item/2019-a-world-at-risk

Gates und andere führten eine Tischsimulation und eine unglaublich genaue Vorhersage der angeblichen „Atemwegsvirus-Pandemie“ durch. An Ereignis 201 waren alle jetzt erwarteten Verdächtigen beteiligt, die an diesem seit langem geplanten Angriff auf die Menschheit beteiligt waren. https://youtu.be/AoLw-Q8X174

Das ist jetzt natürlich keine Neuigkeit, aber im wahrsten Sinne des Wortes: „Wie stehen die Chancen???“ ein neuartiges, aus China stammendes Coronavirus für ihr globales Pandemie-Modell auszuwählen? https://www.gpmb.org/annual-reports/overview/item/2019-a-world-at-risk

Wie kann die Kombination erstaunlich unwahrscheinlicher Ereignisse, bei denen Gates die Nase vorn hat, kein spöttisches Gelächter auslösen? Ich kann wirklich nicht erklären, warum fast jeder nicht erkennt, dass Gates so erfolgreich darin ist, Dinge vorherzusagen, weil er Teil einer Gruppe ist, die diese Dinge geschehen lässt?

Kurz nachdem uns mitgeteilt wurde, dass eine „Covid-Pandemie“ im Gange sei, ging Gates dazu über, endlos über neuartige Impfstoffe zu reden. Schon damals war bekannt, dass Grippeimpfstoffe nicht wirken. Sie reduzieren Krankenhausaufenthalte und Todesfälle nicht. Gates und das gesamte GPMB wussten das. Es wird nicht veröffentlicht, ist aber in mehreren wichtigen, von Experten begutachteten Zeitschriftenartikeln enthalten.

Warum konnte er dann guten Gewissens vorgeben, dass ein anderer injizierter „Impfstoff“ gegen eine fiktive Atemwegs-„Virus“-Erkrankung wirksam sei?

Selbst wenn die Pandemie genau so verlief, wie sie es beschrieben haben, und selbst wenn es sich um einen ehrlichen Versuch handelte, einen <sicheren und wirksamen> Impfstoff zu entwickeln, warum sollten sie dann nicht damit rechnen, dass die vielleicht ähnlichste Behandlung, die bei Grippe nicht wirkt, völlig unwirksam sein wird? -ähnliche Krankheiten?

Und aufgrund der Investitionen seiner Stiftung in Impfstoffe hätte er sicherlich vom Scheitern der Grippeimpfstoffe gewusst. Und dass die Durchführung der Forschung und Entwicklung sowie die damit verbundene Qualitätsfertigung unmöglich in weniger als mehreren Jahren (>>4 Jahren, mit Gegenwind) erledigt werden kann.

Dann war er überall im Fernsehen und sagte der Welt, dass „die Dinge erst wieder zur Normalität zurückkehren werden, wenn wir so ziemlich den gesamten Planeten geimpft haben“. Das haben wir noch nie getan, sondern Grippeimpfungen zum Beispiel nur für anfällige Personen angeboten (und das jüngste und abscheuliche Beispiel, Kinder mit überflüssigen Grippeschutzimpfungen zu impfen).
TEIL 2 - s. unten

TEIL 2 DER ÜBERSETZUNG :

Helfen Sie den Menschen zu erkennen, wie völlig bizarr und offensichtlich fiktiv die gesamte Erzählung rund um Gates, „Pandemien“ und „Impfstoffe“ ist. Bitte versuchen Sie es, obwohl ich weiß, dass die meisten Leute es nicht hören wollen.

Besten Wünsche
Mike