Forwarded from Bob 🤨
Carter himself references another recent essay by James Delingpole, which too treats this issue. Delingpole goes for the extreme angle: that there was in fact no Covid virus at all, and that people who claimed to have suffered its symptoms were merely possessed of a psychosomatic illness.
Some on Twitter have accused figures like Eugyppius of being ‘controlled opposition’ in the way that they steer the conversation to safe waters, within the Overton allowance of railing against Pharma, but not pointing the finger at secret governmental, military, and deep state conspirators.
One even bigger recent example, is the accusation of Robert Kennedy Jr. which attempts to expose even him as ‘controlled opposition’ for allegedly covering for Pfizer. At the 4:30 mark of this report, Stew Peters takes aim at RFK Jr. for stonewalling the release of an interview with Karen Kingston which purportedly revolves around evidence that the U.S. government in fact developed the Covid virus at Fort Detrick. Peters says that RKF Jr. is covering for Pfizer by saying just enough to appease the anti-vax crowd, while keeping himself confined to boundaries of discourse acceptable to his establishment controllers.

And Peters may very well be right; we saw with our own eyes, not long ago, how quickly one’s career can be destroyed if one dares go too far in challenging Pfizer. Remember James O’Keefe and the Project Veritas debacle of late last year? O’keefe spent over a decade going after all the ‘verboten’ monoliths without nary a problem. But as soon as he barked up the Pfizer tree, Project Veritas nearly imploded, and he was ousted by his own Board.
This proves Pfizer is intimately tied into the very heart of the global Military-Industrial-Media-Complex, a key, vital component of it deemed ‘untouchable’. Which further confirms that the portion of the globalist machine that is Pfizer’s domain is of unparalleled importance to the overall schemes and long-term goals of the ruling class. If they’re willing to bear the indignities of O’Keefe’s slings and arrows against themselves for countless years, but jump into panic mode as soon as he sets his sights on Pfizer, then that is very revealing.
And as of this very writing, Tucker Carlson has just been ousted from Fox only a day after a new AOC interview where she called for a government sanctioned ban on Fox News. RFK Jr. even immediately went on to claim that it’s directly related to challenging Big Pharma:

II.
The end of the Covid era now appears to be characterized by attempts from the establishment to steer the historiography of what really happened into opportune directions, sweep up all the ‘inconveniences’ under the rug and memory-hole them by way of their MSM-induced mind-distortion mechanisms. This has caused the situation to devolve into one similar to the post-9/11 era, where the carnival-esque portion of the discourse was strategically amplified (Aliens and Space Lasers demolishing the towers, etc.) to shield the real methods and motives quietly swept under the rug.
Now, the entrenched parties quibble over whether the virus was developed in Fort Detrick or Wuhan, whether it was a virus at all or psychosomata. But all this works to conceal the most important question: that of purpose.
But before we get to that, let us first briefly cover a few ground-laying basics. One thing that’s often left out in the discussion is how bizarrely engineered the very opening of the first Covid assault was. What we saw was undoubtedly a highly choreographed intel operation to douse society with a tidal deluge of paralyzing imagery. What’s scarier is most of those early images and videos have now been scrubbed from the net. Now you’ll be hard-pressed to find the dozens of clips showing people in China dying in the streets, falling over their car hoods, dropping paralytically onto the pavement while spastically foaming at the mouth.
Some on Twitter have accused figures like Eugyppius of being ‘controlled opposition’ in the way that they steer the conversation to safe waters, within the Overton allowance of railing against Pharma, but not pointing the finger at secret governmental, military, and deep state conspirators.
One even bigger recent example, is the accusation of Robert Kennedy Jr. which attempts to expose even him as ‘controlled opposition’ for allegedly covering for Pfizer. At the 4:30 mark of this report, Stew Peters takes aim at RFK Jr. for stonewalling the release of an interview with Karen Kingston which purportedly revolves around evidence that the U.S. government in fact developed the Covid virus at Fort Detrick. Peters says that RKF Jr. is covering for Pfizer by saying just enough to appease the anti-vax crowd, while keeping himself confined to boundaries of discourse acceptable to his establishment controllers.

And Peters may very well be right; we saw with our own eyes, not long ago, how quickly one’s career can be destroyed if one dares go too far in challenging Pfizer. Remember James O’Keefe and the Project Veritas debacle of late last year? O’keefe spent over a decade going after all the ‘verboten’ monoliths without nary a problem. But as soon as he barked up the Pfizer tree, Project Veritas nearly imploded, and he was ousted by his own Board.
This proves Pfizer is intimately tied into the very heart of the global Military-Industrial-Media-Complex, a key, vital component of it deemed ‘untouchable’. Which further confirms that the portion of the globalist machine that is Pfizer’s domain is of unparalleled importance to the overall schemes and long-term goals of the ruling class. If they’re willing to bear the indignities of O’Keefe’s slings and arrows against themselves for countless years, but jump into panic mode as soon as he sets his sights on Pfizer, then that is very revealing.
And as of this very writing, Tucker Carlson has just been ousted from Fox only a day after a new AOC interview where she called for a government sanctioned ban on Fox News. RFK Jr. even immediately went on to claim that it’s directly related to challenging Big Pharma:

II.
The end of the Covid era now appears to be characterized by attempts from the establishment to steer the historiography of what really happened into opportune directions, sweep up all the ‘inconveniences’ under the rug and memory-hole them by way of their MSM-induced mind-distortion mechanisms. This has caused the situation to devolve into one similar to the post-9/11 era, where the carnival-esque portion of the discourse was strategically amplified (Aliens and Space Lasers demolishing the towers, etc.) to shield the real methods and motives quietly swept under the rug.
Now, the entrenched parties quibble over whether the virus was developed in Fort Detrick or Wuhan, whether it was a virus at all or psychosomata. But all this works to conceal the most important question: that of purpose.
But before we get to that, let us first briefly cover a few ground-laying basics. One thing that’s often left out in the discussion is how bizarrely engineered the very opening of the first Covid assault was. What we saw was undoubtedly a highly choreographed intel operation to douse society with a tidal deluge of paralyzing imagery. What’s scarier is most of those early images and videos have now been scrubbed from the net. Now you’ll be hard-pressed to find the dozens of clips showing people in China dying in the streets, falling over their car hoods, dropping paralytically onto the pavement while spastically foaming at the mouth.
Substack
So You Think You Had a Novel, Bio-Engineered, Lab-Leaked Virus?
Tell me about your personal experiences of Covid 19.
Forwarded from Bob 🤨

Many of the videos were more than obvious fakes, such as one showing a masked Chinese man keeling over face-forward, only to reflexively ‘catch himself’ with his hands to break his fall. And how about the many staged videos of people in body-bags moving or ‘waking up’? This begs the obvious question: was China then ‘in on it’? Or are the Chinese simply more societally/culturally susceptible to effects of mass psychogenic hysteria?
Those early videos remain a key source of evidence of foul play for the fact that they appeared to portray the illness as a terrifying storm sweeping through the world, killing people on the spot, akin to films like Outbreak or The Andromeda Strain. However, the tepid form we now know the illness ultimately took leaves a gargantuan discrepancy between the two realizations.

The other point is that most people point to Fort Detrick as being the chief Western connection to Covid’s development, and that once it was shipped out to Wuhan it was fully under the aegis of China’s CPC. However, they seem little aware of the fact that the Wuhan institute itself was not only constructed by the West, but was run under heavy managerial guidance and overwatch of Western institutions. This fact is often swept under the rug because the wider ‘Wuhan Institute of Virology’ incorporates many different institutes and facilities distributed throughout China. However, the specific BSL-4 facility, which was China’s first and only of its kind to deal with the highest level of infectious diseases, was in fact developed and designed by France’s Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie (CIRI).
The maximum-level biosafety laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the first of its kind to be built in China, and has been the centre of huge speculation since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic which originated in that city. The laboratory, which is equipped to handle Class 4 pathogens (P4) including dangerous viruses such as Ebola, was built with the help of French experts and under the guidance of French billionaire businessman Alain Mérieux, despite strong objections by health and defence officials in Paris. Since the laboratory's inauguration by prime minister Bernard Cazeneuve in 2017, however, France has had no supervisory role in the running of the facility and planned cooperation between French researchers and the laboratory has come to a grinding halt. Karl Laske and Jacques Massey report.
The project took more than a decade to complete, and in February 2017, high-level French and Chinese officials held a ceremony to mark the lab’s accreditation.
Then-French Prime Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said at the time that it was a celebration of Franco-Chinese scientific cooperation.
To support the China-French project, France would make its technical expertise available to China to support the continuous improvement of the laboratory’s quality and safety, Cazeneuve added.
It would also budget 1 million euros per year for five years, he said.
Many of the videos were more than obvious fakes, such as one showing a masked Chinese man keeling over face-forward, only to reflexively ‘catch himself’ with his hands to break his fall. And how about the many staged videos of people in body-bags moving or ‘waking up’? This begs the obvious question: was China then ‘in on it’? Or are the Chinese simply more societally/culturally susceptible to effects of mass psychogenic hysteria?
Those early videos remain a key source of evidence of foul play for the fact that they appeared to portray the illness as a terrifying storm sweeping through the world, killing people on the spot, akin to films like Outbreak or The Andromeda Strain. However, the tepid form we now know the illness ultimately took leaves a gargantuan discrepancy between the two realizations.

The other point is that most people point to Fort Detrick as being the chief Western connection to Covid’s development, and that once it was shipped out to Wuhan it was fully under the aegis of China’s CPC. However, they seem little aware of the fact that the Wuhan institute itself was not only constructed by the West, but was run under heavy managerial guidance and overwatch of Western institutions. This fact is often swept under the rug because the wider ‘Wuhan Institute of Virology’ incorporates many different institutes and facilities distributed throughout China. However, the specific BSL-4 facility, which was China’s first and only of its kind to deal with the highest level of infectious diseases, was in fact developed and designed by France’s Centre International de Recherche en Infectiologie (CIRI).
The maximum-level biosafety laboratory at the Wuhan Institute of Virology was the first of its kind to be built in China, and has been the centre of huge speculation since the start of the Covid-19 pandemic which originated in that city. The laboratory, which is equipped to handle Class 4 pathogens (P4) including dangerous viruses such as Ebola, was built with the help of French experts and under the guidance of French billionaire businessman Alain Mérieux, despite strong objections by health and defence officials in Paris. Since the laboratory's inauguration by prime minister Bernard Cazeneuve in 2017, however, France has had no supervisory role in the running of the facility and planned cooperation between French researchers and the laboratory has come to a grinding halt. Karl Laske and Jacques Massey report.
The project took more than a decade to complete, and in February 2017, high-level French and Chinese officials held a ceremony to mark the lab’s accreditation.
Then-French Prime Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said at the time that it was a celebration of Franco-Chinese scientific cooperation.
To support the China-French project, France would make its technical expertise available to China to support the continuous improvement of the laboratory’s quality and safety, Cazeneuve added.
It would also budget 1 million euros per year for five years, he said.
calameo.com
Science&Santé n°36 - Fertilité : Nos générations futures en dangers ?
La fertilité humaine est-elle menacée ? Le magazine Science&Santé s’est penché sur cette question qui inquiète aujourd’hui de nombreux couples. L’occasion de faire le point sur la situation, sur les différentes causes possibles...
WHO hat sich als eine Terrororganisation entpuppt und wird als solche zunehmend genannt. Nun übernimmt sie jetzt die Macht der EU.
Dies ist der erste Baustein des WHO Global Digital Prison
„ Die Europäische Kommission und die WHO starten bahnbrechende digitale Gesundheitsinitiative zur Stärkung der globalen Gesundheitssicherheit “
....................................................................................................................................
This is the first building block of the WHO Global Digital Prison
"The European Commission and WHO launch landmark digital health initiative to strengthen global health security"
https://www.who.int/news/item/05-06-2023-the-european-commission-and-who-launch-landmark-digital-health-initiative-to-strengthen-global-health-security
Dies ist der erste Baustein des WHO Global Digital Prison
„ Die Europäische Kommission und die WHO starten bahnbrechende digitale Gesundheitsinitiative zur Stärkung der globalen Gesundheitssicherheit “
....................................................................................................................................
This is the first building block of the WHO Global Digital Prison
"The European Commission and WHO launch landmark digital health initiative to strengthen global health security"
https://www.who.int/news/item/05-06-2023-the-european-commission-and-who-launch-landmark-digital-health-initiative-to-strengthen-global-health-security
Forwarded from M B
How does the WHO and all the globalist orgs keep saying with a straight face that we’re conspiracy theorists and then they openly do what we were called conspiracy theorists for warning about.
Anyways, it’s out there now… people warning others that this was coming, and now it is coming. They can pretend that this has nothing to do with total control of the population all they want but the warning has been out there for years now.
Anyways, it’s out there now… people warning others that this was coming, and now it is coming. They can pretend that this has nothing to do with total control of the population all they want but the warning has been out there for years now.
Forwarded from Sonnie Today
This feels like one of the most significant letters of a hundred years
Forwarded from William
They did. Analysis of history. Council of Nicea and other "moderators" crafted the "New Testament" and made it Church doctrine. The problem being, many parts of the text do not stand up to actual history.
In short, as with all other tripartite deities, upon which Christianity is based; as in birth, death and rebirth cults, they were and are political tools used by "them" to dominate "us".
"They've" been successful at it for approx 3,000 years to date. There is no evil to which they won't stoop to continue their reign.
In short, as with all other tripartite deities, upon which Christianity is based; as in birth, death and rebirth cults, they were and are political tools used by "them" to dominate "us".
"They've" been successful at it for approx 3,000 years to date. There is no evil to which they won't stoop to continue their reign.
Forwarded from Bettina Gorzolla offiziell🕊️🌍🕊️🌍🕊️
München, Landgericht 06.06.23
Robert Höschele, gläubiger Jude, wird nach 4 Stunden Gerichtsverhandlung in zweiter Instanz wegen "Volksverhetzung" zu 90 Tagessätzen á 15 Euro "verurteilt"
.... die Statements von RA Sattelmeier und Robert Höschele
Robert Höschele, gläubiger Jude, wird nach 4 Stunden Gerichtsverhandlung in zweiter Instanz wegen "Volksverhetzung" zu 90 Tagessätzen á 15 Euro "verurteilt"
.... die Statements von RA Sattelmeier und Robert Höschele
Forwarded from RA Ludwig - Querdenkeranwalt
⬆️⬆️⬆️Leider schlechte Tonqualität!
Ein Gericht in Deutschland verurteilt im Jahr 2023 einen jüdischen Mann wegen Volksverhetzung, weil er in Bezug auf die Corona-Politik gerufen hat:
Wehret den Anfängen!
Bei tkp hat er diese Absurdität wunderbar zusammengefasst:
"Die Menschen sollen Interesse zeigen an diesem Thema. Ein Fall wie meiner ist doch aus justiztheoretischer Sicht äußerst spannend. Nochmal: ein Jude, der sehr genau weiß, was der Holocaust bedeutet hat und der nicht zuletzt deshalb diesem Staat sehr kritisch gegenübersteht, wird im Land der Täter wegen Holocaust-Leugnung angeklagt.
Das ist doch eine Pervertierung des § 130, der in meinen Augen wirklich sinnvoll ist bzw. war. Darin heißt es u.a. „Mit Freiheitsstrafe bis zu fünf Jahren oder mit Geldstrafe wird bestraft, wer eine unter der Herrschaft des Nationalsozialismus begangene Handlung der in § 6 Abs. 1 des Völkerstrafgesetzbuches bezeichneten Art in einer Weise, die geeignet ist, den öffentlichen Frieden zu stören, öffentlich oder in einer Versammlung billigt, leugnet oder verharmlost.“
Die Taten der Deutschen zu verharmlosen, käme mir wirklich nicht in den Sinn. Die heutigen Verantwortlichen verstecken sich hinter 6 Millionen Toten, für die sie bzw. ihre Vorfahren verantwortlich sind. Ich habe den Staat aufgrund der völlig ungerechtfertigten Maßnahmen angegriffen und dafür wenden sie den 130er auf die zwei Zitate von mir an.
Aber dass sie diesen Paragraphen jetzt gegen einen Juden anwenden, der vor den Anfängen warnt, ist in meinen Augen positiv. Es macht die ganze Absurdität überdeutlich, sodass mehr und mehr Menschen merken, dass da etwas nicht stimmen kann, mit diesem „Rechts“staat. Sichtbarkeit ist daher mein Hauptanliegen. Ich kann die 120 Tage im Bau aushalten – aber ich ziehe das auch bis zur obersten Instanz durch. Ich stehe ja zu dem, was ich gesagt habe. Darum würde ich mir wünschen, dass mehr Journalisten den Fall aufgreifen und bei Gericht vor Ort dabei sind."
Die Nachfahren der Täter urteilen über die Gefühle eines Nachfahren der Opfer und missbrauchen die Opfer, um den Nachfahren als Täter zu verurteilen.
Dirk Sattelmaier sieht hier eine mögliche Rechtsbeugung, ich sehe hier eine Delegitimierung jeglichen rechtsstaatlichen Verhaltens und zivilastorischen Fortschritts unter ahistorischer Verdrehung des Selbstverständnisses des Nachkriegskonsens
Mein Kanal:
t.me/RA_LUDWIG
Ein Gericht in Deutschland verurteilt im Jahr 2023 einen jüdischen Mann wegen Volksverhetzung, weil er in Bezug auf die Corona-Politik gerufen hat:
Wehret den Anfängen!
Bei tkp hat er diese Absurdität wunderbar zusammengefasst:
"Die Menschen sollen Interesse zeigen an diesem Thema. Ein Fall wie meiner ist doch aus justiztheoretischer Sicht äußerst spannend. Nochmal: ein Jude, der sehr genau weiß, was der Holocaust bedeutet hat und der nicht zuletzt deshalb diesem Staat sehr kritisch gegenübersteht, wird im Land der Täter wegen Holocaust-Leugnung angeklagt.
Das ist doch eine Pervertierung des § 130, der in meinen Augen wirklich sinnvoll ist bzw. war. Darin heißt es u.a. „Mit Freiheitsstrafe bis zu fünf Jahren oder mit Geldstrafe wird bestraft, wer eine unter der Herrschaft des Nationalsozialismus begangene Handlung der in § 6 Abs. 1 des Völkerstrafgesetzbuches bezeichneten Art in einer Weise, die geeignet ist, den öffentlichen Frieden zu stören, öffentlich oder in einer Versammlung billigt, leugnet oder verharmlost.“
Die Taten der Deutschen zu verharmlosen, käme mir wirklich nicht in den Sinn. Die heutigen Verantwortlichen verstecken sich hinter 6 Millionen Toten, für die sie bzw. ihre Vorfahren verantwortlich sind. Ich habe den Staat aufgrund der völlig ungerechtfertigten Maßnahmen angegriffen und dafür wenden sie den 130er auf die zwei Zitate von mir an.
Aber dass sie diesen Paragraphen jetzt gegen einen Juden anwenden, der vor den Anfängen warnt, ist in meinen Augen positiv. Es macht die ganze Absurdität überdeutlich, sodass mehr und mehr Menschen merken, dass da etwas nicht stimmen kann, mit diesem „Rechts“staat. Sichtbarkeit ist daher mein Hauptanliegen. Ich kann die 120 Tage im Bau aushalten – aber ich ziehe das auch bis zur obersten Instanz durch. Ich stehe ja zu dem, was ich gesagt habe. Darum würde ich mir wünschen, dass mehr Journalisten den Fall aufgreifen und bei Gericht vor Ort dabei sind."
Die Nachfahren der Täter urteilen über die Gefühle eines Nachfahren der Opfer und missbrauchen die Opfer, um den Nachfahren als Täter zu verurteilen.
Dirk Sattelmaier sieht hier eine mögliche Rechtsbeugung, ich sehe hier eine Delegitimierung jeglichen rechtsstaatlichen Verhaltens und zivilastorischen Fortschritts unter ahistorischer Verdrehung des Selbstverständnisses des Nachkriegskonsens
Mein Kanal:
t.me/RA_LUDWIG
Telegram
❌RA Ludwig - Querdenkeranwalt
Forwarded from Kanal Rechtsanwalt Dirk Sattelmaier
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
❗️Neues aus dem Gerichtssaal❗️
Heute:
Landgericht München I
In der heutigen Berufungsverhandlung wurde der jüdische Mandant wegen des Verstoßes gegen § 130 Abs. 3 StGB in der Begehungsweise der „Verharmlosung“ zu einer Geldstrafe verurteilt.
Dabei ließ das Gericht die rechtlichen Einwände der Verteidigung bis hin zu einer Entscheidung des BVerfG aus dem Jahre 2018 nahezu unberücksichtigt.
Sollte diese Entscheidung rechtskräftig werden, ist dies ein weiterer Baustein zur Einschränkung der Meinungsfreiheit des Art. 5 GG mit der Folge, dass jegliche Bezugnahme unter dem Gesichtspunkt „Wehret der Anfängen“ künftig ein Strafverfahren nach sich ziehen wird.
Eine gefährliche Entwicklung im Rahmen der Rechtssprechung zum § 130 Abs. 3 StGB. Der Freispruch für Prof. Bhakdi stellt in diesem Zusammenhang lediglich die Ausnahme dar.
Alles Infos im Video
Mein Kanal:
https://t.me/RASattelmaier
Heute:
Landgericht München I
In der heutigen Berufungsverhandlung wurde der jüdische Mandant wegen des Verstoßes gegen § 130 Abs. 3 StGB in der Begehungsweise der „Verharmlosung“ zu einer Geldstrafe verurteilt.
Dabei ließ das Gericht die rechtlichen Einwände der Verteidigung bis hin zu einer Entscheidung des BVerfG aus dem Jahre 2018 nahezu unberücksichtigt.
Sollte diese Entscheidung rechtskräftig werden, ist dies ein weiterer Baustein zur Einschränkung der Meinungsfreiheit des Art. 5 GG mit der Folge, dass jegliche Bezugnahme unter dem Gesichtspunkt „Wehret der Anfängen“ künftig ein Strafverfahren nach sich ziehen wird.
Eine gefährliche Entwicklung im Rahmen der Rechtssprechung zum § 130 Abs. 3 StGB. Der Freispruch für Prof. Bhakdi stellt in diesem Zusammenhang lediglich die Ausnahme dar.
Alles Infos im Video
Mein Kanal:
https://t.me/RASattelmaier
Forwarded from Bettina Gorzolla offiziell🕊️🌍🕊️🌍🕊️
München, Landgericht 06.06.23
Robert Höschele wird zu 90 Tagessätzen á 15 Euro "verurteilt"
Später die Statements von RA Sattelmeier und Robert Höschele
Robert Höschele wird zu 90 Tagessätzen á 15 Euro "verurteilt"
Später die Statements von RA Sattelmeier und Robert Höschele
Forwarded from Bettina Gorzolla offiziell🕊️🌍🕊️🌍🕊️
Hitzig im Gerichtsaal....
...jetzt Pause.....mit RA Dirk Sattelmaier
Mit keinem Wort wurde vom Angeklagten ein Vergleich, oder eine Verharmlosung ausgesprochen.
Während der Pause lässt die Richterin einen Beamer holen, um die ganze Rede anzusehen/hören
...jetzt Pause.....mit RA Dirk Sattelmaier
Mit keinem Wort wurde vom Angeklagten ein Vergleich, oder eine Verharmlosung ausgesprochen.
Während der Pause lässt die Richterin einen Beamer holen, um die ganze Rede anzusehen/hören
Forwarded from Bettina Gorzolla offiziell🕊️🌍🕊️🌍🕊️
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
München Landgericht, 06.06.23
Robert Höschele kurz vor seiner Verhandlung
Vorwurf: "Volksverhetzung"
Robert Höschele kurz vor seiner Verhandlung
Vorwurf: "Volksverhetzung"
Forwarded from Robin Monotti
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Opening statement at Roger Waters' concert, London, 6th June 2023.
Forwarded from The Awakened Species ☀️
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Tap water is the most underrated cause of disease, loaded with heavy metals, pesticides, fluoride, chlorine, pharma products, etc.
Join @awakenedspecies
Join @awakenedspecies
Der Ausdruck "Verschwörungstheoretiker" wird von geistig behinderten Menschen benutzt, um eine Debatte zu beenden. In der täglichen Praxis ist es so.
Diesen Text fand ich nicht schlecht ! Er schlägt vor, den Menschen zu zeigen, dass sie das Wort "Verschwörung" lediglich als Synonym für "Kooperation" und "Koordination" benutzen, was ganz normale, menschliche Aktivitäten sind.
"Oh, du bist also ein Kooperationsleugner ?" - so dreht man den Spieß um.
................................................................................................................
"But that's just a conspiracy theory How do we disrupt their programming"
https://youtu.be/J4O5RAdyb6Q
Diesen Text fand ich nicht schlecht ! Er schlägt vor, den Menschen zu zeigen, dass sie das Wort "Verschwörung" lediglich als Synonym für "Kooperation" und "Koordination" benutzen, was ganz normale, menschliche Aktivitäten sind.
"Oh, du bist also ein Kooperationsleugner ?" - so dreht man den Spieß um.
................................................................................................................
"But that's just a conspiracy theory How do we disrupt their programming"
https://youtu.be/J4O5RAdyb6Q
YouTube
"But, that's just a conspiracy theory"
Have you ever been called a conspiracy theorist by a brainwashed 'normie'. It can be annoying, can't it? In this video, I explain what I do when somebody calls me a conspiracy theorist, and give some examples of the standard phrases, arguments, and questions…