Queue for brain
197 subscribers
4.03K photos
3.43K videos
44 files
11K links
My Substack : suavek1.substack.com
Download Telegram
Forwarded from Robin Monotti
May 13, 2023

"Once killing the sufferer becomes a societally acceptable means for ending suffering, there becomes no end to the “suffering” that justifies human termination. We can see this phenomenon most vividly in Canada, because it is happening there more quickly than in most cultures. For example, a recent poll found that 27 percent of Canadians polled strongly or moderately agree that euthanasia is acceptable for suffering caused by “poverty” and 28 percent strongly or moderately agree that killing by doctors is acceptable for suffering caused by homelessness.

Euthanasia mutates a society’s soul. I can’t imagine that being true ten years ago before euthanasia became legal.

This kind of abandoned thinking finds enthusiastic, albeit not unanimous, expression among secular bioethicists. In fact, two Canadian bioethicists just published a paper in the Journal of Medical Ethics — a prestigious British Medical Journal publication — arguing that “unjust social conditions” justify lethal jabs (euphemistically called MAiD, for “medical assistance in dying”). The argument claims that killing is a form of “harm reduction.”"

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/bioethicists-euthanasia-okay-for-unjust-social-conditions/
Forwarded from Jackie Portman
Please both talk about midazolam deaths. They murdered our loved seniors. And it continues. They matter too.

This is not a health service!
Forwarded from The Vigilant Fox 🦊
FDA-Approved Alternative to Sugar Turns Out to Be ‘Genotoxic’: Study

New health and safety findings reveal sucralose (Splenda) is “genotoxic,” meaning it breaks up DNA.

And that’s on top of other condemning evidence revealed in a recent study.

Article: https://bit.ly/3J5cu5Y

Follow @VigilantFox 🦊
Rumble | Substack | Socials
Forwarded from Robin Monotti
https://academic.oup.com/ofid/article/10/6/ofad209/7131292

None of us will be shocked by the finding that the so-called bivalent vaccines don’t “work” (reduce the prevalence of a positive PCR test). Meaningless results in my eyes. Those who still believe there’s been a pandemic are surely very disturbed that authorisation was granted without any efficacy data, based on the assumption that earlier mRNA vaccines were “very safe”.
Lay people might want to retain a copy of this paper because people will be in denial about non working vaccines which are also dangerous.
Best wishes
Mike
...
plus / minus = minus

The sad joke of such claims of effectiveness is that in such studies only the percentage calculated POSITIVE effectiveness against a specific virus should be presented. The NEGATIVE effect on the immune system, which appears in later infections with other viruses or bacteria, is not taken into account. That the ruined immune system fights off other infections less efficiently is not even mentioned. Such a focus on a single point of reality can never present a whole, truthful picture.

From this point of view, it doesn't matter at all how high the alleged effectiveness is mathematically.

It's still a joke. Any layman can easily understand this simple scam and therefore this understanding can be demanded and expected from every vaccinator.

It's too simple to be able to claim credibly : "I didn't know anything about that" !

In my opinion, without the corresponding reference to the limited validity of the stated effectiveness, it should be assumed that such a vaccination was carried out without informed consent.

I hope legal professionals will recognize that this is fundamental to global fraud that predates Covid-19 history. It might therefore make sense to take legal action against these bases because it is a simple and logically understandable fact.
Forwarded from PLANDEMIC 1984
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Dr Ben Marble - People are brainwashed. They do not want to believe that this level of evil exists.
Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt

Wenn die Gesellschaft nicht zu einer wissenschaftlichen und vorurteilsfreien Betrachtung zurückkehrt, stehen wir an einer Zeitenwende, ähnlich wie im Jahr 529 n. Chr. als Kaiser Justinian die Athener Philosophenschule schließen ließ. Entweder kriegen wir die Kurve noch irgendwie oder wir kehren von der Wissenschaft, die den Diskurs sucht, ab, und wenden uns einer ideologischen Betrachtungsweise der Welt und der Menschen zu.

https://www.100aerzte.com/kongress/arne-burkhardt/
...
Pictures before and after "vaccination" !

Forwarded from a tweet from Prof. Stephan Homburg.

( The automatic translation unfortunately incorrectly translates the correct first name "Stephan" to "Stephen" ).

Source :

https://twitter.com/SHomburg?ref_src=twsrc%5Egoogle%7Ctwcamp%5Eserp%7Ctwgr%5Eauthor
Forwarded from Ethical Skeptic
Hot off the presses...

The Cancer Train just keeps on rollin' for our younger age cohorts. Up 20.5%

As you can see, the inertial inflection for this change had a specific date = Week 14 2021

Where does this end?

@EthicalSkeptic
Forwarded from Ethical Skeptic
Gots to be Long Covid. 😏

No, no... it's 20 year-old's not going to the doctor. No wait, fentanyl. No, this is natural causes? ...uhhhh, it's climate change, ... it's uhhhh...

I'm stumped, what could this be??? More kids dying NOW than died during DELTA. 26.4% to the excess.

@EthicalSkeptic
Forwarded from Ethical Skeptic
Cancer Mortality Update Week 21 2023

➼ Cancer UCoD = 3.0% Excess (Spring Lull)
➼ Cancer MCoD = 6.9% Excess
➼ Ages 0-54 Cancers = 20.5% Excess
➼ PPI Cancer Treatment = 11.4% Excess

This is NOT due to Covid, Long Covid, nor 'deferred screenings'.

@EthicalSkeptic