...
Do you know the real balance of power in the USA ?
Federal Reserve ( FED ) & Operation Duck Hunt
" (...) The history of the most powerful central bank in the world begins with a secret mission. On a November night in 1910, eight men meet on an abandoned train platform in the small town of Hoboken, a few miles from Manhattan. One of them, Senator Nelson Aldrich, had sworn the group to be very careful: don't talk to anyone along the way, shrug off reporters, and tell your families you're going duck hunting.
(...)
Opponents of the Federal Reserve (Fed) are still frustrated by the central bank's nebulous founding and opaque structure. How can one of the most important institutions of modern times be based on a secret plan instead of a democratic process? And aren't the Founding Fathers proof enough that the Fed should never serve the American people, only Wall Street?
(…)
Indicator of lack of transparency
In order to get the law through in Parliament, Aldrich had to play to the power of his wealthy allies. Eventually, with strong financial support, the colorless Democrat Woodrow Wilson won the 1913 presidential election. Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act the day before Christmas Eve, when most legislators were well into their vacations. According to lore, Wilson regretted this decision throughout his life.
On his deathbed he is said to have said: "I have betrayed my country." From now on his fate lies "in the hands of a few men."
(...).“
https://www.trend.at/wirtschaft/business/100-jahre-federal-reserve-370451
Do you know the real balance of power in the USA ?
Federal Reserve ( FED ) & Operation Duck Hunt
" (...) The history of the most powerful central bank in the world begins with a secret mission. On a November night in 1910, eight men meet on an abandoned train platform in the small town of Hoboken, a few miles from Manhattan. One of them, Senator Nelson Aldrich, had sworn the group to be very careful: don't talk to anyone along the way, shrug off reporters, and tell your families you're going duck hunting.
(...)
Opponents of the Federal Reserve (Fed) are still frustrated by the central bank's nebulous founding and opaque structure. How can one of the most important institutions of modern times be based on a secret plan instead of a democratic process? And aren't the Founding Fathers proof enough that the Fed should never serve the American people, only Wall Street?
(…)
Indicator of lack of transparency
In order to get the law through in Parliament, Aldrich had to play to the power of his wealthy allies. Eventually, with strong financial support, the colorless Democrat Woodrow Wilson won the 1913 presidential election. Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act the day before Christmas Eve, when most legislators were well into their vacations. According to lore, Wilson regretted this decision throughout his life.
On his deathbed he is said to have said: "I have betrayed my country." From now on his fate lies "in the hands of a few men."
(...).“
https://www.trend.at/wirtschaft/business/100-jahre-federal-reserve-370451
trend.
100 Jahre Federal Reserve
Am 23. Dezember jährt sich die Gründung der US-Notenbank Federal Reserve zum 100. Mal. Am Tag vor Heiligabend 1913 unterzeichnete US-Präsident Woodrow Wilson den Federal Reserve Act.
Forwarded from Robin Monotti
Hazardous Ingredients of HPV Vaccines Increase Risk to Young People (Part 4)
"Adjuvants are used in HPV vaccines including Gardasil to get the attention of the immune system.
Aluminum is a common adjuvant in Gardasil that may be responsible for adverse events.
Another discovered “secret” ingredient of Gardasil “HPV DNA”, may also be responsible for adverse events.
Both immunogenic adjuvants may induce a strong immune response or autoimmune conditions."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/hazardous-ingredients-of-hpv-vaccines-increase-risk-to-young-people-part-4_5053536.html
"Adjuvants are used in HPV vaccines including Gardasil to get the attention of the immune system.
Aluminum is a common adjuvant in Gardasil that may be responsible for adverse events.
Another discovered “secret” ingredient of Gardasil “HPV DNA”, may also be responsible for adverse events.
Both immunogenic adjuvants may induce a strong immune response or autoimmune conditions."
https://www.theepochtimes.com/health/hazardous-ingredients-of-hpv-vaccines-increase-risk-to-young-people-part-4_5053536.html
The Epoch Times
Hazardous Ingredients of HPV Vaccines Increase Risk to Young People (Part 4)
Forwarded from Robin Monotti
This has to go round before they try another lockdown. Please share.
@RobinMG
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1676615464292605952
@RobinMG
https://twitter.com/robinmonotti/status/1676615464292605952
...
Do you know the real balance of power in the USA ?
Federal Reserve ( FED ) & Operation Duck Hunt
" (...) The history of the most powerful central bank in the world begins with a secret mission. On a November night in 1910, eight men meet on an abandoned train platform in the small town of Hoboken, a few miles from Manhattan. One of them, Senator Nelson Aldrich, had sworn the group to be very careful: don't talk to anyone along the way, shrug off reporters, and tell your families you're going duck hunting.
(...)
Opponents of the Federal Reserve (Fed) are still frustrated by the central bank's nebulous founding and opaque structure. How can one of the most important institutions of modern times be based on a secret plan instead of a democratic process? And aren't the Founding Fathers proof enough that the Fed should never serve the American people, only Wall Street?
(…)
Indicator of lack of transparency
In order to get the law through in Parliament, Aldrich had to play to the power of his wealthy allies. Eventually, with strong financial support, the colorless Democrat Woodrow Wilson won the 1913 presidential election. Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act the day before Christmas Eve, when most legislators were well into their vacations. According to lore, Wilson regretted this decision throughout his life.
On his deathbed he is said to have said: "I have betrayed my country." From now on his fate lies "in the hands of a few men."
(...).“
https://www.trend.at/wirtschaft/business/100-jahre-federal-reserve-370451
Do you know the real balance of power in the USA ?
Federal Reserve ( FED ) & Operation Duck Hunt
" (...) The history of the most powerful central bank in the world begins with a secret mission. On a November night in 1910, eight men meet on an abandoned train platform in the small town of Hoboken, a few miles from Manhattan. One of them, Senator Nelson Aldrich, had sworn the group to be very careful: don't talk to anyone along the way, shrug off reporters, and tell your families you're going duck hunting.
(...)
Opponents of the Federal Reserve (Fed) are still frustrated by the central bank's nebulous founding and opaque structure. How can one of the most important institutions of modern times be based on a secret plan instead of a democratic process? And aren't the Founding Fathers proof enough that the Fed should never serve the American people, only Wall Street?
(…)
Indicator of lack of transparency
In order to get the law through in Parliament, Aldrich had to play to the power of his wealthy allies. Eventually, with strong financial support, the colorless Democrat Woodrow Wilson won the 1913 presidential election. Wilson signed the Federal Reserve Act the day before Christmas Eve, when most legislators were well into their vacations. According to lore, Wilson regretted this decision throughout his life.
On his deathbed he is said to have said: "I have betrayed my country." From now on his fate lies "in the hands of a few men."
(...).“
https://www.trend.at/wirtschaft/business/100-jahre-federal-reserve-370451
trend.
100 Jahre Federal Reserve
Am 23. Dezember jährt sich die Gründung der US-Notenbank Federal Reserve zum 100. Mal. Am Tag vor Heiligabend 1913 unterzeichnete US-Präsident Woodrow Wilson den Federal Reserve Act.
Forwarded from Einigkeit Recht Freiheit
Was hier suggeriert wird: Die Regierung agiert fraglich, die Opposition klagt, das BVerfGE spricht Recht, der Rechtsstaat funktioniert. Aber was bedeutet das nun für die Menschen? Es ist immer noch möglich, dass die Novellierung überhaupt nicht kommt.
Bisher ist es so, dass der Austausch einer alten Heizung staatlich gefördert wird. Heißt: Alle Steuerzahler werden gezwungen, sich an den Kosten für den Einzelnen zu beteiligen. Wird der Heizungstausch zur Pflicht, entfällt auch die Grundlage für Fördermittel.
Die Vorgaben für die Transformation bestehen schon länger, nicht erst seit Verabschiedung des GEG in 2020, welches bis dahin bestehende Gesetze und Verordnungen bündelte.
Grundlage sind Richtlinien der EU, insbesondere die Erneuerbare-Energien-Richtlinie (RED), die Gebäuderichtlinie (EPBD) und die Energieeffizienz-Richtlinie (EED) und letztlich auch der Green Deal von 2021, der die Erreichung der Klimaziele (Klimaneutralität bis 2050) zum Gesetz für alle EU-Länder gemacht hat. Daraus resultierte auch „Fit für 55“, was die Senkung der Treibhausgasemissionen um mindestens 55 % gegenüber 1990 rechtlich bindend machte. Sie sagen, dass Gebäude für etwa 40 % des Energieverbrauchs und 36 % der Treibhausgasemissionen verantwortlich sind.
Die EU hat bereits 2020 ihre sogenannte Renovierungswellenstrategie vorgestellt. Darin sind zur Umsetzung der strengen Vorgaben Förderungen explizit vorgesehen. Dies ist strategisch klug, erhöht es doch die Akzeptanz für die Maßnahmen. Denn viele Menschen sind sich nicht dessen bewusst, dass dieses Geld letztlich ihr eigenes ist bzw. auch anderen Menschen zuvor unter Zwang entwendet wurde.
Kommt zu den sogenannten Anreizen noch das EU-Emissionshandelssystem, welches die bisher führenden Heizarten stark verteuern wird, muss man sich in Anbetracht all dieser bereits eingeleiteten Transformationsprozesse fragen, ob es überhaupt einer Novellierung des deutschen GEG bedarf, um die Menschen dahin zu bringen, wo man sie haben will.
Außerdem steht noch die Möglichkeit im Raum, dass die EU nach jahrelanger Förderung Wärmepumpen zur Pflicht macht. So wäre die Masse schon abgeholt und den Rest zwingt man einfach in die Entwicklung. Eine Ankündigung, die dafür relevante Ökodesign-Richtlinie (ErP) bis 2029 anzupassen, gab es bereits. Dies müsste nicht mehr von Rat und Parlament verabschiedet, sondern könnte direkt von der Kommission beschlossen werden. Aber wir wissen, dass das Ziel nicht ist, dass jeder eine Wärmepumpe und dann seinen Frieden hat.
Eine Wärmepumpe hat eine durchschnittliche Lebensdauer von 15 bis 20 Jahren. Als Kühlungsmittel dienen fluorierte Kältemittel, sogenannte F-Gase. Am 30.03.2023 hatte das Europäische Parlament der Novellierung der F-Gase-Verordnung zugestimmt. Ab 2039 soll die Produktion, bis 2050 der Verbrauch von F-Gasen verboten sein. Eine Alternative wäre Propan, was aber aufgrund der Brennbarkeit weitere Auflagen mit sich ziehen würde, die wiederum teure bauliche Veränderungen voraussetzen. Auch die CO2-Kühlung würde deutlich höhere Kosten für den Betreiber einer Wärmepumpe bedeuten.
Zum Schluss nun noch ein Zitat aus den Ausführungen der EU-Kommission: „Bei der Sanierungswelle geht es nicht nur darum, die bestehenden Gebäude energieeffizienter und klimaneutraler zu machen. Es kann eine groß angelegte Transformation unserer Städte und unserer gebauten Umwelt auslösen.“ Hier sei an die Konzeption für die 15-Minuten-Städte erinnert.
Was ich mit all dem sagen möchte: Noch fördert man die bereits jetzt strengen Vorgaben. Gleichzeitig werden Strafen für die Nichterfüllung eingebracht. Den Menschen wird also klar gemacht, dass sie etwas tun müssen. Jetzt mit Förderung oder später unter Zwang mit Strafandrohung. So oder so: Es werden Vermögenswerte für irre Klimabestrebungen vernichtet. Du wirst nichts mehr besitzen…
Bisher ist es so, dass der Austausch einer alten Heizung staatlich gefördert wird. Heißt: Alle Steuerzahler werden gezwungen, sich an den Kosten für den Einzelnen zu beteiligen. Wird der Heizungstausch zur Pflicht, entfällt auch die Grundlage für Fördermittel.
Die Vorgaben für die Transformation bestehen schon länger, nicht erst seit Verabschiedung des GEG in 2020, welches bis dahin bestehende Gesetze und Verordnungen bündelte.
Grundlage sind Richtlinien der EU, insbesondere die Erneuerbare-Energien-Richtlinie (RED), die Gebäuderichtlinie (EPBD) und die Energieeffizienz-Richtlinie (EED) und letztlich auch der Green Deal von 2021, der die Erreichung der Klimaziele (Klimaneutralität bis 2050) zum Gesetz für alle EU-Länder gemacht hat. Daraus resultierte auch „Fit für 55“, was die Senkung der Treibhausgasemissionen um mindestens 55 % gegenüber 1990 rechtlich bindend machte. Sie sagen, dass Gebäude für etwa 40 % des Energieverbrauchs und 36 % der Treibhausgasemissionen verantwortlich sind.
Die EU hat bereits 2020 ihre sogenannte Renovierungswellenstrategie vorgestellt. Darin sind zur Umsetzung der strengen Vorgaben Förderungen explizit vorgesehen. Dies ist strategisch klug, erhöht es doch die Akzeptanz für die Maßnahmen. Denn viele Menschen sind sich nicht dessen bewusst, dass dieses Geld letztlich ihr eigenes ist bzw. auch anderen Menschen zuvor unter Zwang entwendet wurde.
Kommt zu den sogenannten Anreizen noch das EU-Emissionshandelssystem, welches die bisher führenden Heizarten stark verteuern wird, muss man sich in Anbetracht all dieser bereits eingeleiteten Transformationsprozesse fragen, ob es überhaupt einer Novellierung des deutschen GEG bedarf, um die Menschen dahin zu bringen, wo man sie haben will.
Außerdem steht noch die Möglichkeit im Raum, dass die EU nach jahrelanger Förderung Wärmepumpen zur Pflicht macht. So wäre die Masse schon abgeholt und den Rest zwingt man einfach in die Entwicklung. Eine Ankündigung, die dafür relevante Ökodesign-Richtlinie (ErP) bis 2029 anzupassen, gab es bereits. Dies müsste nicht mehr von Rat und Parlament verabschiedet, sondern könnte direkt von der Kommission beschlossen werden. Aber wir wissen, dass das Ziel nicht ist, dass jeder eine Wärmepumpe und dann seinen Frieden hat.
Eine Wärmepumpe hat eine durchschnittliche Lebensdauer von 15 bis 20 Jahren. Als Kühlungsmittel dienen fluorierte Kältemittel, sogenannte F-Gase. Am 30.03.2023 hatte das Europäische Parlament der Novellierung der F-Gase-Verordnung zugestimmt. Ab 2039 soll die Produktion, bis 2050 der Verbrauch von F-Gasen verboten sein. Eine Alternative wäre Propan, was aber aufgrund der Brennbarkeit weitere Auflagen mit sich ziehen würde, die wiederum teure bauliche Veränderungen voraussetzen. Auch die CO2-Kühlung würde deutlich höhere Kosten für den Betreiber einer Wärmepumpe bedeuten.
Zum Schluss nun noch ein Zitat aus den Ausführungen der EU-Kommission: „Bei der Sanierungswelle geht es nicht nur darum, die bestehenden Gebäude energieeffizienter und klimaneutraler zu machen. Es kann eine groß angelegte Transformation unserer Städte und unserer gebauten Umwelt auslösen.“ Hier sei an die Konzeption für die 15-Minuten-Städte erinnert.
Was ich mit all dem sagen möchte: Noch fördert man die bereits jetzt strengen Vorgaben. Gleichzeitig werden Strafen für die Nichterfüllung eingebracht. Den Menschen wird also klar gemacht, dass sie etwas tun müssen. Jetzt mit Förderung oder später unter Zwang mit Strafandrohung. So oder so: Es werden Vermögenswerte für irre Klimabestrebungen vernichtet. Du wirst nichts mehr besitzen…
Forwarded from Einigkeit Recht Freiheit
Auch wird den Menschen weiterhin vorgegaukelt, dass die relevanten Beschlüsse aus Berlin kommen. Dies ermöglicht das politische Schauspiel, welches wir seit Monaten beobachten können. Ampel gegen Opposition. Klimawahn gegen gesunden Menschenverstand. So wird es suggeriert. Bitte zieht in Erwägung, dass ein sogenannter Rechtsruck Teil des dualistischen Spiels sein könnte.
Die Menschen werden mit tief in ihr Eigentum eingreifenden Maßnahmen konfrontiert. Es wird so dargestellt, als käme dieser Plan nun von der Ampel. So kann die Opposition sich in Stellung bringen und Sätze wie „Wir nehmen die grünen Wahnsinnsgesetze wieder zurück“ (Weidel, AfD) oder in leicht anderer Formulierung seitens der CDU/CSU vortragen. Funfact: Abgesehen davon, dass die BRD zur Anpassung von nationalem Recht verpflichtet ist, haben Letztere 2020 das GEG selbst im Kabinett Merkel beschlossen. Was mit dem Hick-Hack aber nun erreicht wird, ist, dass viele Menschen gar nicht überblicken, was genau vor sich geht, aber in dem Vertrauen bleiben, dass Strukturen Partei ergreifen, die die Entwicklungen genau so falsch finden.
Ein Blick in andere EU-Länder, in denen bereits eine Mitte-Rechts-Koalition regiert, zeigt, dass die Hoffnungen der Menschen unbegründet waren. Es ist eine Ruhigstellung während an den relevanten Stellen weiter ungestört an den immer totalitäreren Umsetzungen des eigentlichen Plans gearbeitet werden kann, ohne, dass dies Beachtung findet. Und ganz am Ende geht es nicht, wie hier beispielhaft dargestellt, um Wärmepumpen oder andere vorgeschobene Anpassungen. Es geht um die Vernichtung von Vermögenswerten, die letztlich auch Freiheit bedeuten. Es geht um totale Kontrolle durch die Abhängigkeit von diesem System.
Je früher und je mehr Menschen verstehen, dass all das, was uns hier politisch und medial vorgeführt wird, dazu dient, dass der Mensch nicht zu sich selbst findet und daraus Lösungen ersinnt, die diese Strukturen überflüssig machen, desto größer ist die Chance, dass wir uns nicht wie vorgesehen in ein dystopisches digitales Kontrollsystem begeben, sondern Schritte gehen, die freiheitliche Bestrebungen zur Grundlage haben. Und der Wille zu dieser Erkenntnis und die Umsetzung der erforderlichen Schritte liegt in jedem Einzelnen selbst und wird in Summe das Wohl und die Freiheit aller mehren.
Die Menschen werden mit tief in ihr Eigentum eingreifenden Maßnahmen konfrontiert. Es wird so dargestellt, als käme dieser Plan nun von der Ampel. So kann die Opposition sich in Stellung bringen und Sätze wie „Wir nehmen die grünen Wahnsinnsgesetze wieder zurück“ (Weidel, AfD) oder in leicht anderer Formulierung seitens der CDU/CSU vortragen. Funfact: Abgesehen davon, dass die BRD zur Anpassung von nationalem Recht verpflichtet ist, haben Letztere 2020 das GEG selbst im Kabinett Merkel beschlossen. Was mit dem Hick-Hack aber nun erreicht wird, ist, dass viele Menschen gar nicht überblicken, was genau vor sich geht, aber in dem Vertrauen bleiben, dass Strukturen Partei ergreifen, die die Entwicklungen genau so falsch finden.
Ein Blick in andere EU-Länder, in denen bereits eine Mitte-Rechts-Koalition regiert, zeigt, dass die Hoffnungen der Menschen unbegründet waren. Es ist eine Ruhigstellung während an den relevanten Stellen weiter ungestört an den immer totalitäreren Umsetzungen des eigentlichen Plans gearbeitet werden kann, ohne, dass dies Beachtung findet. Und ganz am Ende geht es nicht, wie hier beispielhaft dargestellt, um Wärmepumpen oder andere vorgeschobene Anpassungen. Es geht um die Vernichtung von Vermögenswerten, die letztlich auch Freiheit bedeuten. Es geht um totale Kontrolle durch die Abhängigkeit von diesem System.
Je früher und je mehr Menschen verstehen, dass all das, was uns hier politisch und medial vorgeführt wird, dazu dient, dass der Mensch nicht zu sich selbst findet und daraus Lösungen ersinnt, die diese Strukturen überflüssig machen, desto größer ist die Chance, dass wir uns nicht wie vorgesehen in ein dystopisches digitales Kontrollsystem begeben, sondern Schritte gehen, die freiheitliche Bestrebungen zur Grundlage haben. Und der Wille zu dieser Erkenntnis und die Umsetzung der erforderlichen Schritte liegt in jedem Einzelnen selbst und wird in Summe das Wohl und die Freiheit aller mehren.
Forwarded from Robin Monotti
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
It’s very important to also watch this short excerpt of the program that was never broadcast. It brings together a different group of people who say the hypothesis that “HIV is the probable cause of AIDS” is wrong, and they support their arguments differently than you heard from the people in the clip which began with Kary Mullis.
It’s unequivocally the case that there’s no definitive diagnostic test. PCR is not it. Even antibodies aren’t it.
Did you know that finding “antibodies to components of HIV” occurs in a long list of non infectious, non-AIDS diseases?
I didn’t.
What that tells me is that the antibody based tests are definitely measuring something common to those other conditions and that common factor is not a retrovirus.
https://twitter.com/joshwalkos/status/1677419961805840384
It’s unequivocally the case that there’s no definitive diagnostic test. PCR is not it. Even antibodies aren’t it.
Did you know that finding “antibodies to components of HIV” occurs in a long list of non infectious, non-AIDS diseases?
I didn’t.
What that tells me is that the antibody based tests are definitely measuring something common to those other conditions and that common factor is not a retrovirus.
https://twitter.com/joshwalkos/status/1677419961805840384
Forwarded from Robin Monotti
I’ve long been dubious about antibody testing for covid. I worked in development of tests just like these and they’re nothing like as discriminating as most people think.
More evidence of fraud.
Same methods as in covid.
Crucially, many of the same actors. Fauci & Wellcome for sure. I rather suspect Pfizer, too.
Please watch & note well, this is exactly the same method of fraud as is in use right now in relation to “covid”.
Sick and dead people are mis-assigned a cause of their illness. But they were sick and died for reasons other than this fake cause.
Best wishes
Mike
More evidence of fraud.
Same methods as in covid.
Crucially, many of the same actors. Fauci & Wellcome for sure. I rather suspect Pfizer, too.
Please watch & note well, this is exactly the same method of fraud as is in use right now in relation to “covid”.
Sick and dead people are mis-assigned a cause of their illness. But they were sick and died for reasons other than this fake cause.
Best wishes
Mike
Forwarded from Robin Monotti
https://youtu.be/iSkSuukO6SU
It’s obvious that Khan has cleverly placed a “Chinese Wall” of his own staff between the ongoing consultation about ULEZ expansion and the Mayor himself.
It’s simply not credible that the handful of people who report to the Mayor did not once mention the state of the consultation at any point along the timeline.
I’ve been at mid corporate levels in large MN corporations and CEO of a privately funded biotech.
If, in an enquiry about a decision I’d made & the underlying work that I said had informed my decision, I denied learning ANYTHING about how it was progressing at any point from several staff who’s jobs, bonuses and progression was largely in my hands, despite all of those staff having attended several update meetings on the state of play, there would have been a number of consequences:
1. No one would believe me. Those of us who’ve held analogous positions know full well that we WOULD have been briefed, if not in detail (probably wouldn’t have been in detail), then in broad brush & CERTAINLY about “hot button” topics.
2. If I repeated the assertion to the Board, that I’d known NOTHING until the final report date, they’d have sacked me. How would I have warned stakeholders if things were off track? I’d have been instructed in terms that my conduct had fallen far below that expected, etc. They’d have expected me to know about, yet not to act in ways prejudicial to, oxthe publicly declared process. This is NORMAL. Khan knows this (so I assert he was briefed along the way & I don’t know why he’s lying here). The more senior you get, the more important is to know what is going on & to steer judiciously.
3. What is even worse is the lack of objective information prior even to have decided anything about ULEZ (let alone it’s expansion). My training does include respiratory particulate deposition (as opposed to entry) in the airways, the theoretical concerns, the experimental evidence (I’m the author of several papers on impact of ozone (O3) on pulmonary function) of real harms, such that defensible limits could be set. I’m of the expert opinion that NOTHING is needed to bear down on air quality. The battle was long ago won & it’s a good thing too. In short, the air is so clean in London in relation to vehicle emissions that further changes would no measurable difference. A grand total of zero lives will be saved by essentially disabling a growing proportion of the population by further measures. The entire air quality issue is now politically a much bigger concern politically than ever it was when it was killing thousands a year.
4. Swapping out older internal combustion engined vehicles & replacing them with EVs probably would change nothing about air quality and it may even increase transport related deaths. The transition is pushing poorer people out of their legally purchased & operated cars into public transport. Air quality is measurably worse there. For example in London Underground, the level of respirable particulates from metal wheels & tracks, from brake linings, from dust forcibly driven into the air path of the passengers, is much higher now than ever it was, anywhere above ground, relating to private vehicle originated emissions.
Given the foregoing, it’s obviously relevant & represents an intolerable conflict of interests that Khan is doing anything to make private car/van transport tough to use.
Why do I say that? He’s a very senior & important member of a UN-initiated, GLOBAL group called the C40 Cities program, and their goals, in a nutshell, at identical to a subset of The Great Reset & the UN2030 sustainable development goals. These are intended to PERMANENTLY DEPRIVE us of personal transportation and thereby trap us in so-called “15 minute zones”.
If this sounds completely incompatible with a thriving, healthy and happy human community, you’re absolutely right. I’ve uncovered other evidence, unrelated to Khan, that is absolutely compelling and has as endgame FAR fewer people. Bluntly, those I call “the perpetrators” intend to murder the vast majority of us.
It’s obvious that Khan has cleverly placed a “Chinese Wall” of his own staff between the ongoing consultation about ULEZ expansion and the Mayor himself.
It’s simply not credible that the handful of people who report to the Mayor did not once mention the state of the consultation at any point along the timeline.
I’ve been at mid corporate levels in large MN corporations and CEO of a privately funded biotech.
If, in an enquiry about a decision I’d made & the underlying work that I said had informed my decision, I denied learning ANYTHING about how it was progressing at any point from several staff who’s jobs, bonuses and progression was largely in my hands, despite all of those staff having attended several update meetings on the state of play, there would have been a number of consequences:
1. No one would believe me. Those of us who’ve held analogous positions know full well that we WOULD have been briefed, if not in detail (probably wouldn’t have been in detail), then in broad brush & CERTAINLY about “hot button” topics.
2. If I repeated the assertion to the Board, that I’d known NOTHING until the final report date, they’d have sacked me. How would I have warned stakeholders if things were off track? I’d have been instructed in terms that my conduct had fallen far below that expected, etc. They’d have expected me to know about, yet not to act in ways prejudicial to, oxthe publicly declared process. This is NORMAL. Khan knows this (so I assert he was briefed along the way & I don’t know why he’s lying here). The more senior you get, the more important is to know what is going on & to steer judiciously.
3. What is even worse is the lack of objective information prior even to have decided anything about ULEZ (let alone it’s expansion). My training does include respiratory particulate deposition (as opposed to entry) in the airways, the theoretical concerns, the experimental evidence (I’m the author of several papers on impact of ozone (O3) on pulmonary function) of real harms, such that defensible limits could be set. I’m of the expert opinion that NOTHING is needed to bear down on air quality. The battle was long ago won & it’s a good thing too. In short, the air is so clean in London in relation to vehicle emissions that further changes would no measurable difference. A grand total of zero lives will be saved by essentially disabling a growing proportion of the population by further measures. The entire air quality issue is now politically a much bigger concern politically than ever it was when it was killing thousands a year.
4. Swapping out older internal combustion engined vehicles & replacing them with EVs probably would change nothing about air quality and it may even increase transport related deaths. The transition is pushing poorer people out of their legally purchased & operated cars into public transport. Air quality is measurably worse there. For example in London Underground, the level of respirable particulates from metal wheels & tracks, from brake linings, from dust forcibly driven into the air path of the passengers, is much higher now than ever it was, anywhere above ground, relating to private vehicle originated emissions.
Given the foregoing, it’s obviously relevant & represents an intolerable conflict of interests that Khan is doing anything to make private car/van transport tough to use.
Why do I say that? He’s a very senior & important member of a UN-initiated, GLOBAL group called the C40 Cities program, and their goals, in a nutshell, at identical to a subset of The Great Reset & the UN2030 sustainable development goals. These are intended to PERMANENTLY DEPRIVE us of personal transportation and thereby trap us in so-called “15 minute zones”.
If this sounds completely incompatible with a thriving, healthy and happy human community, you’re absolutely right. I’ve uncovered other evidence, unrelated to Khan, that is absolutely compelling and has as endgame FAR fewer people. Bluntly, those I call “the perpetrators” intend to murder the vast majority of us.
YouTube
🚨 Sadiq Khan GRILLED over ULEZ dishonesty (Mayor's worst day ever?)
Watch Peter Fortune AM methodically question Sadiq Khan on the ULEZ consultation process, when he and his senior staffers were briefed and why he made false and dishonest statements to the London Assembly.
MQT | 19 January 2023
Twitter: www.twitter.co…
MQT | 19 January 2023
Twitter: www.twitter.co…
Forwarded from KanekoaTheGreat
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
President John F. Kennedy signed National Security Action Memorandum 263 on October 11, 1963, to develop troop withdrawal plans from the Vietnam War. However, he was assassinated a month later.
Following Kennedy's assassination, President Lyndon B. Johnson escalated U.S. military involvement in Vietnam significantly, leading to a substantial increase in troop levels and a protracted war that lasted for years.
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1677040369920536576
@KanekoaTheGreat
Following Kennedy's assassination, President Lyndon B. Johnson escalated U.S. military involvement in Vietnam significantly, leading to a substantial increase in troop levels and a protracted war that lasted for years.
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1677040369920536576
@KanekoaTheGreat
Forwarded from KanekoaTheGreat
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Twitter co-founder @Jack says that he believes the CIA assassinated President John F. Kennedy because he opposed escalating the Vietnam War.
"After he died, his order was reversed, and we went full force into Vietnam with Lyndon B. Johnson."
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1677037893020446721
@KanekoaTheGreat
"After he died, his order was reversed, and we went full force into Vietnam with Lyndon B. Johnson."
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1677037893020446721
@KanekoaTheGreat
Forwarded from KanekoaTheGreat
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
THREAD — Russia and Ukraine Accuse Each Other of Planning an Attack on Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant
Two weeks ago, Senators Lindsey Graham and Richard Blumenthal introduced a resolution stating that an attack on a Ukrainian nuclear facility would be an attack on NATO.
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1676687968013279232
@KanekoaTheGreat
Two weeks ago, Senators Lindsey Graham and Richard Blumenthal introduced a resolution stating that an attack on a Ukrainian nuclear facility would be an attack on NATO.
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1676687968013279232
@KanekoaTheGreat
THREAD — Mark Zuckerberg privately told Facebook execs to be cautious about mRNA vaccines because
"we just don't know the long-term side effects of basically modifying people's DNA and RNA."
He then censored scientists, doctors, and mRNA vaccine-injured individuals.
https://t.me/KanekoaTheGreat/7143
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1676792059267788802
"we just don't know the long-term side effects of basically modifying people's DNA and RNA."
He then censored scientists, doctors, and mRNA vaccine-injured individuals.
https://t.me/KanekoaTheGreat/7143
https://twitter.com/KanekoaTheGreat/status/1676792059267788802
Telegram
KanekoaTheGreat
THREAD — Mark Zuckerberg privately told Facebook execs to be cautious about mRNA vaccines because "we just don't know the long-term side effects of basically modifying people's DNA and RNA."
He then censored scientists, doctors, and mRNA vaccine-injured…
He then censored scientists, doctors, and mRNA vaccine-injured…
Forwarded from Robin Monotti
https://humansbefree.com/2021/01/pcr-testing-scam-technique-cannot-be-used-to-detect-viruses.html
Folks,
This is old, late 2021, but it contains such vital information that I’m sharing it, because it’s likely that a number of channel readers haven’t seen it.
Dr Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize-winning scientist, invented the technique called PCR.
Note, there’s no such thing as a “PCR test”, only tests purporting to be clinical diagnostic tests which happen to be PCR-technique based.
Mullis said his reaction, PCR, was not suitable to constitute a diagnostic test.
“Positive results” do not mean that the alleged pathogen has been detected. It doesn’t mean you’re sick with a certain pathogen (the claim was for a viral illness, though a growing number of people, me included, no longer accept the unsupported claim that viruses exist that convey diseases from one person to another. The pieces of genetic code may code for something real, but that isn’t a disease-causing entity).
This brief program, called The David Knight Show, quotes a number of well regarded research scientists, all of the opinion that Fauci and colleagues have deliberately misled everyone using money and the power of TV & of patronage via Federal Government grants, to plant seeds and punish anyone pointing out that, in relation to AIDS, what was growing wasn’t a sturdy sapling but a weed, out of control. Fake information.
In a way, the misattribution of the cause of a claimed new illness, AIDS, to a novel retrovirus, HIV, by misuse of a technique, PCR, a priori unsuitable for the purpose of clinical diagnosis, in order to generate a multibillion dollar a year industry, is a form of “dry run” for what today is intended to strip almost everyone of their freedoms and autonomy. It’s my solidly supported view that this time, the perpetrators intend to misuse the power over humanity that they crave in order to delete (murder, depopulate, eliminate) a sizeable proportion of earth’s population.
All mRNA-based injectables, that are being described as vaccines, are inherently incompatible with health. They intentionally & unavoidably cause harm; inducing a human body to express a protein that doesn’t belong, because it’s a “non-self” protein and is therefore recognized as an invader or an aberrant cell, axiomatically initiates lethal autoimmune responses. Someone with an intact immune system will kill every cell that takes up some of the lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA & transcribes it into this purported viral protein.
Whether SARS-CoV-2 exists independently of a computer isn’t relevant to my concern. Wherever the “spike protein” sequence comes from doesn’t matter in this context. The key thing to appreciate is that it’s not a human protein, it’s not “self”. Our immune systems get trained, during embryonic development, specifically NOT to attack self, but to respond to anything non-self with a vigorous, lethal, immunological response.
It’s no good looking for silver linings in this regard. The conceptual design of these purported vaccines inexorably leads to neoautoimmunity, a very bad thing.
That factories are going up all over the world, to manufacture billions of doses of these dangerous materials can have no purpose other than to injure, maim and kill.
There are so many separate, yet convergent, lines of evidence that the intention is mass killing that I’m almost tearful in my frustration when I hear people paint a potentially benign intent or some kind of misunderstanding. To quote Margaret Anna Alice, “Mistakes Were Not Made”.
This before we even get into ovarian (& I recently learned from human, post mortem examinations by the late Dr Arne Burkhardt, a top pathologist, that testicular tissue was replete with spike protein encoding mRNA) targeting reproductive organs, as well as tissues all over the body.
The chemical mRNA bases, used to construct the injections, had been modified such that it’s less likely to be recognized as foreign genetic material & once inside a human cell, making this foreign protein, it’s much more persistent than we were lied to about.
Folks,
This is old, late 2021, but it contains such vital information that I’m sharing it, because it’s likely that a number of channel readers haven’t seen it.
Dr Kary Mullis, Nobel Prize-winning scientist, invented the technique called PCR.
Note, there’s no such thing as a “PCR test”, only tests purporting to be clinical diagnostic tests which happen to be PCR-technique based.
Mullis said his reaction, PCR, was not suitable to constitute a diagnostic test.
“Positive results” do not mean that the alleged pathogen has been detected. It doesn’t mean you’re sick with a certain pathogen (the claim was for a viral illness, though a growing number of people, me included, no longer accept the unsupported claim that viruses exist that convey diseases from one person to another. The pieces of genetic code may code for something real, but that isn’t a disease-causing entity).
This brief program, called The David Knight Show, quotes a number of well regarded research scientists, all of the opinion that Fauci and colleagues have deliberately misled everyone using money and the power of TV & of patronage via Federal Government grants, to plant seeds and punish anyone pointing out that, in relation to AIDS, what was growing wasn’t a sturdy sapling but a weed, out of control. Fake information.
In a way, the misattribution of the cause of a claimed new illness, AIDS, to a novel retrovirus, HIV, by misuse of a technique, PCR, a priori unsuitable for the purpose of clinical diagnosis, in order to generate a multibillion dollar a year industry, is a form of “dry run” for what today is intended to strip almost everyone of their freedoms and autonomy. It’s my solidly supported view that this time, the perpetrators intend to misuse the power over humanity that they crave in order to delete (murder, depopulate, eliminate) a sizeable proportion of earth’s population.
All mRNA-based injectables, that are being described as vaccines, are inherently incompatible with health. They intentionally & unavoidably cause harm; inducing a human body to express a protein that doesn’t belong, because it’s a “non-self” protein and is therefore recognized as an invader or an aberrant cell, axiomatically initiates lethal autoimmune responses. Someone with an intact immune system will kill every cell that takes up some of the lipid nanoparticle-encapsulated mRNA & transcribes it into this purported viral protein.
Whether SARS-CoV-2 exists independently of a computer isn’t relevant to my concern. Wherever the “spike protein” sequence comes from doesn’t matter in this context. The key thing to appreciate is that it’s not a human protein, it’s not “self”. Our immune systems get trained, during embryonic development, specifically NOT to attack self, but to respond to anything non-self with a vigorous, lethal, immunological response.
It’s no good looking for silver linings in this regard. The conceptual design of these purported vaccines inexorably leads to neoautoimmunity, a very bad thing.
That factories are going up all over the world, to manufacture billions of doses of these dangerous materials can have no purpose other than to injure, maim and kill.
There are so many separate, yet convergent, lines of evidence that the intention is mass killing that I’m almost tearful in my frustration when I hear people paint a potentially benign intent or some kind of misunderstanding. To quote Margaret Anna Alice, “Mistakes Were Not Made”.
This before we even get into ovarian (& I recently learned from human, post mortem examinations by the late Dr Arne Burkhardt, a top pathologist, that testicular tissue was replete with spike protein encoding mRNA) targeting reproductive organs, as well as tissues all over the body.
The chemical mRNA bases, used to construct the injections, had been modified such that it’s less likely to be recognized as foreign genetic material & once inside a human cell, making this foreign protein, it’s much more persistent than we were lied to about.
Forwarded from Robin Monotti
In some cases, individuals have been forced whose bodies are still making spike proteins 18mo after injection. This also isn’t a mistake, I assure you. So-called rational drug design doesn’t guarantee success. The main problems in seeking a new drug treatment are that we lack sufficient information about what presumed pathological processes to target. What we’re much better at, though, is avoiding known toxicities, by recognizing where things have gone wrong in the past and excluding them from
What’s happening here is that someone has taken those lessons from clinical toxicology and applied them with the intention of causing harm. I’m absolutely certain of this.
Back to the beginning. The misuse of the technique called PCR in order to generate “cases”, whether or not any illness is present, gives the perpetrators unlimited scope to interfere with the lives of everyone. Meanwhile, they can damage food supply chains, wreck the financial system and install a totalitarian control system.
As in HIV & AIDS, so to SARS-CoV-2 and “covid-19”.
In both cases, people can be sick and sometimes die.
The cause of their illnesses is not infection by a retrovirus, but all the usual, unfortunate things to which we can fall prey.
In both cases, drugs & other treatments are pushed that cause deaths, many many deaths, attributed to AIDS or covid19, respectively, as well as making a ton of money for various co-conspiracists.
Yesterday, in one of the clips from the never-broadcast, one hour TV documentary, I learned that the tests for “antibodies to HIV”, were also completely useless & fraudulent. We know this because these antibodies are elevated in sonething like 17 other clinical conditions, where there’s no suggestion of immunodeficiency, diseases such as arthritis.
We probably don’t yet know, in the case of “covid19”, whether the so-called rapid antigen tests detect antigens which are elevated in a variety of clinical conditions. I expect that it will.
All components of these faked illnesses have been deliberately designed to give results consistent with the central narrative, that there’s an infectious disease hazard out & about, and the authorities reluctantly “have to” curtail our liberties and impose requirements, purely for our health and safety.
The more people realise that this isn’t genuine and underwrites the most appalling threat to Western ideals, the better our chances of deflecting or at least delaying the plans of the perpetrators.
Any of us keeping a foot in the camp of the narrative is trapping themselves and others in the lies of the perpetrators.
I close by reminding everyone that, given there are already a series of falsehoods so serious & clear that it’s not possible for all this to be a genuine disease outbreak, it’s rational to look at everything through the eyes of a person who’s decided we are under an existential threat.
If instead, a person decides to fall in line with the narrative in order to avoid potential public humiliation, and I’m right, they will lose their liberty and probably their life.
If on the other hand, you choose to disbelieve the official narrative & it turns out that I’m wrong, the worst that could happen is that you might get laughed at.
These two positions are not faintly balanced. Until the position clarifies further, the rational position is intense scepticism.
I put it to you that you really need convince yourself that a single, central narrative point is a lie & you’ve destroyed the narrative. We’ve way, way more than that & have had since 2020.
I’ve laid out some of this in order to offer some ammunition with which to engage in diplomacy within your network.
I wish you good fortune.
Best wishes and thanks,
Mike
What’s happening here is that someone has taken those lessons from clinical toxicology and applied them with the intention of causing harm. I’m absolutely certain of this.
Back to the beginning. The misuse of the technique called PCR in order to generate “cases”, whether or not any illness is present, gives the perpetrators unlimited scope to interfere with the lives of everyone. Meanwhile, they can damage food supply chains, wreck the financial system and install a totalitarian control system.
As in HIV & AIDS, so to SARS-CoV-2 and “covid-19”.
In both cases, people can be sick and sometimes die.
The cause of their illnesses is not infection by a retrovirus, but all the usual, unfortunate things to which we can fall prey.
In both cases, drugs & other treatments are pushed that cause deaths, many many deaths, attributed to AIDS or covid19, respectively, as well as making a ton of money for various co-conspiracists.
Yesterday, in one of the clips from the never-broadcast, one hour TV documentary, I learned that the tests for “antibodies to HIV”, were also completely useless & fraudulent. We know this because these antibodies are elevated in sonething like 17 other clinical conditions, where there’s no suggestion of immunodeficiency, diseases such as arthritis.
We probably don’t yet know, in the case of “covid19”, whether the so-called rapid antigen tests detect antigens which are elevated in a variety of clinical conditions. I expect that it will.
All components of these faked illnesses have been deliberately designed to give results consistent with the central narrative, that there’s an infectious disease hazard out & about, and the authorities reluctantly “have to” curtail our liberties and impose requirements, purely for our health and safety.
The more people realise that this isn’t genuine and underwrites the most appalling threat to Western ideals, the better our chances of deflecting or at least delaying the plans of the perpetrators.
Any of us keeping a foot in the camp of the narrative is trapping themselves and others in the lies of the perpetrators.
I close by reminding everyone that, given there are already a series of falsehoods so serious & clear that it’s not possible for all this to be a genuine disease outbreak, it’s rational to look at everything through the eyes of a person who’s decided we are under an existential threat.
If instead, a person decides to fall in line with the narrative in order to avoid potential public humiliation, and I’m right, they will lose their liberty and probably their life.
If on the other hand, you choose to disbelieve the official narrative & it turns out that I’m wrong, the worst that could happen is that you might get laughed at.
These two positions are not faintly balanced. Until the position clarifies further, the rational position is intense scepticism.
I put it to you that you really need convince yourself that a single, central narrative point is a lie & you’ve destroyed the narrative. We’ve way, way more than that & have had since 2020.
I’ve laid out some of this in order to offer some ammunition with which to engage in diplomacy within your network.
I wish you good fortune.
Best wishes and thanks,
Mike
Forwarded from Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH™
False counterclaim by uncredentialed "fact-checker" Ed Payne--NOT a doctor, editor, or reviewer! Why is he concerned? Who is paying him? Valid, large autopsy series after COVID-19 vaccination found ~74% deaths caused by vax! Read, share, you decide.
https://zenodo.org/record/8120771
@P_McCulloughMD
https://zenodo.org/record/8120771
@P_McCulloughMD
Forwarded from Robin Monotti
The extent of lying is absolutely staggering.
The authors on the submitted paper include Dr Peter McCullough, among the most published clinical scientists in the USA. The bulk of the deaths he & others investigated in their review of many papers tackling the subject of potential causes of death, involved the cardiovascular system and blood. Peter’s speciality is the cardiorenal diseases, highly overlapping with the subject matter at hand.
Whoever Ed Payne is, he’s wrong.
Best wishes,
Mike
https://t.me/robinmg/28898
The authors on the submitted paper include Dr Peter McCullough, among the most published clinical scientists in the USA. The bulk of the deaths he & others investigated in their review of many papers tackling the subject of potential causes of death, involved the cardiovascular system and blood. Peter’s speciality is the cardiorenal diseases, highly overlapping with the subject matter at hand.
Whoever Ed Payne is, he’s wrong.
Best wishes,
Mike
https://t.me/robinmg/28898
Telegram
Robin Monotti + Dr Mike Yeadon + Cory Morningstar
False counterclaim by uncredentialed "fact-checker" Ed Payne--NOT a doctor, editor, or reviewer! Why is he concerned? Who is paying him? Valid, large autopsy series after COVID-19 vaccination found ~74% deaths caused by vax! Read, share, you decide.
…
…
Forwarded from Camilo Urbina
The fact check is as shallow as usual, because it focuses in the stupid wording of the daily sceptic sensasionalistic headline and not on the article itself. The daily sceptic wrongly and sensasionalistically states that an article was pulled from the lancet, while the truth is that a preprint uploaded to the lancet preprint server was removed because the Lancet editors did not like it (formally said as “failed to meet selection criteria”) Nothing else. Then the fact checker proceeds to throw the official mantra that a paper that has not been peer reviewed is not a paper (Duh!) but doesn’t address a single line of what the paper says. This is sloppyness and can only fool very stupid people. The sad truth is that most people is very stupid.
Forwarded from Exposing ZioPigs🐷 (🔱Truth King🔱)
Looks like umbrella technology hasn't changed much in 25 Centuries.😺
Persepolis,
Pars (Persia) Province,
Iran 🇮🇷
Persepolis,
Pars (Persia) Province,
Iran 🇮🇷