Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://open.substack.com/pub/suavek1/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-14-9f0
Dear Suavek has ably grouped together my rants about the fake discipline called “virology” with other providing more details of the absence of scientific evidence for the existence of “viruses”.
Enjoy & maybe delve into any of the claimed “pillars” of pretend evidence yourself?
It’s very obvious once you decide to look.
Best wishes
Mike
Dear Suavek has ably grouped together my rants about the fake discipline called “virology” with other providing more details of the absence of scientific evidence for the existence of “viruses”.
Enjoy & maybe delve into any of the claimed “pillars” of pretend evidence yourself?
It’s very obvious once you decide to look.
Best wishes
Mike
Substack
The Arguments for “NO VIRUS” - PART 15. Dr. Mike Yeadon : There really is no scientific evidence for the existence of any virus.
"Initially, it seemed an absurd notion, because of the horrifying implications."
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://interestofjustice.substack.com/p/statement-by-whitehouse-ousted-cdc/comment/100892334
Putting out a slightly extended version of a comment made in recent days.
I do think this might be the mother lode of evidence that will persuade far more people than by going at them with evidence of myriad scientific frauds.
This, as my dear wife constantly reminds me, if because going onto full transmit mode had only a slight chance of being persuasive, a precondition being that the listener is highly receptive, because they’ve come to the conclusion that they’re not being told the truth.
She coaches me to recognise that asking good questions of the listener or correspondent has a much better chance of opening things up in the mind of the other person.
If they get a question that they regard as legitimate and they do not have an answer that sits well with everything else, if at all, they will not be able to properly rest until they’ve an answer to the question.
I’d be very interested to hear if anybody tries it & gets either an answer or just pensive silence, while they process it.
As I’ve said before, why is it that if you even question let alone criticise a vaccine, even if you’re not a medical doctor or life scientist, but a member of any regulated profession, the ceiling falls in on you if you won’t stop asking questions.
I don’t think this is true of any other domain, about which you can less riskily ask questions or overtly disagree with the official position.
Go near vaccines and you are going to be in career limiting trouble pdq. So, WHY is that??
I address the question in the post to which I share a link.
Best wishes
Mike
Putting out a slightly extended version of a comment made in recent days.
I do think this might be the mother lode of evidence that will persuade far more people than by going at them with evidence of myriad scientific frauds.
This, as my dear wife constantly reminds me, if because going onto full transmit mode had only a slight chance of being persuasive, a precondition being that the listener is highly receptive, because they’ve come to the conclusion that they’re not being told the truth.
She coaches me to recognise that asking good questions of the listener or correspondent has a much better chance of opening things up in the mind of the other person.
If they get a question that they regard as legitimate and they do not have an answer that sits well with everything else, if at all, they will not be able to properly rest until they’ve an answer to the question.
I’d be very interested to hear if anybody tries it & gets either an answer or just pensive silence, while they process it.
As I’ve said before, why is it that if you even question let alone criticise a vaccine, even if you’re not a medical doctor or life scientist, but a member of any regulated profession, the ceiling falls in on you if you won’t stop asking questions.
I don’t think this is true of any other domain, about which you can less riskily ask questions or overtly disagree with the official position.
Go near vaccines and you are going to be in career limiting trouble pdq. So, WHY is that??
I address the question in the post to which I share a link.
Best wishes
Mike
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://ncvalues.org/happel/
I’ve just been made aware by lawyer colleagues in the US, some of whom I worked with briefly when we were in Florida.
The decision made by the Supreme Court of North Carolina appears to run head-on, into the Federal law as described in the PREP Act (pandemic response and emergency preparedness Act) and overridden PREP.
Katherine Watt has researched the antecedents of the PREP Act as well as the 2005 Act itself.
In brief, the claim is that “For the greater good”, citizens rights are made secondary, in the event that a “Public Health Emergency” (PHE) is in force, as declared by the President or the Health & Human Services division of the Federal Government.
Anything that the HHS Sec had authorised for deployment into the face of the alleged emergency is deemed “a covered countermeasure”.
Anyone operating under a declared PHE is required to use “covered countermeasures”. The PREP Act holds that, providing you used covered countermeasures & there was a PHE in force, invoking the PREP Act provides full legal immunity to legal action against you.
It’s important to know that, regardless of what fictional scenarios were used in the US Congress in order to have it voted into law, a PHE has no legal definition, nor do covered countermeasures.
To paint an absurd example in order to show how malign this all is, consider the example of a handgun, which fires intentionally curative “projectiles” in its magazine. A duly qualified operator, working within an ongoing PHE and having been told that the “therapy gun” was deemed to be a covered countermeasure, could shoot you in the face and not be subject to prosecution.
In the case under examination here, a 14 year old schoolchild was forcibly injected with a “covid19” “vaccine”, against his wishes and against the express wishes of his mother.
Various institutions got sued & despite an earlier apparent legal victory handed down to the defendants in a lower level court, after at least two appeals, the Supreme Court overrode their legal immunity from prosecution (I think).
I understand nothing specific about US law, but this decision is seemingly much more powerful than the judgement of lower courts. For example, I don’t see how the Supreme Court Of The United States (SCOTUS) could easily declare their state subsidiaries judgements incorrect.
While that might well be possible (which is why SCOTUS judgements can be so far reaching), I don’t think such a case or challenge could so easily be kept out of the public domain.
Best wishes
Mike
I’ve just been made aware by lawyer colleagues in the US, some of whom I worked with briefly when we were in Florida.
The decision made by the Supreme Court of North Carolina appears to run head-on, into the Federal law as described in the PREP Act (pandemic response and emergency preparedness Act) and overridden PREP.
Katherine Watt has researched the antecedents of the PREP Act as well as the 2005 Act itself.
In brief, the claim is that “For the greater good”, citizens rights are made secondary, in the event that a “Public Health Emergency” (PHE) is in force, as declared by the President or the Health & Human Services division of the Federal Government.
Anything that the HHS Sec had authorised for deployment into the face of the alleged emergency is deemed “a covered countermeasure”.
Anyone operating under a declared PHE is required to use “covered countermeasures”. The PREP Act holds that, providing you used covered countermeasures & there was a PHE in force, invoking the PREP Act provides full legal immunity to legal action against you.
It’s important to know that, regardless of what fictional scenarios were used in the US Congress in order to have it voted into law, a PHE has no legal definition, nor do covered countermeasures.
To paint an absurd example in order to show how malign this all is, consider the example of a handgun, which fires intentionally curative “projectiles” in its magazine. A duly qualified operator, working within an ongoing PHE and having been told that the “therapy gun” was deemed to be a covered countermeasure, could shoot you in the face and not be subject to prosecution.
In the case under examination here, a 14 year old schoolchild was forcibly injected with a “covid19” “vaccine”, against his wishes and against the express wishes of his mother.
Various institutions got sued & despite an earlier apparent legal victory handed down to the defendants in a lower level court, after at least two appeals, the Supreme Court overrode their legal immunity from prosecution (I think).
I understand nothing specific about US law, but this decision is seemingly much more powerful than the judgement of lower courts. For example, I don’t see how the Supreme Court Of The United States (SCOTUS) could easily declare their state subsidiaries judgements incorrect.
While that might well be possible (which is why SCOTUS judgements can be so far reaching), I don’t think such a case or challenge could so easily be kept out of the public domain.
Best wishes
Mike
nc values
Happel Opinion
The North Carolina Supreme Court has just issued a landmark ruling in Happel v. Guilford County Schools, affirming that parents have a fundamental right to control the upbringing of their children under Article 1, Section 19 of the state constitution
The Arguments for “NO VIRUS” - PART 16.
Katherine Watt: Illusion that 'something is spreading'. Ben/US Mortality-Substack: The alleged 'SARS-CoV-2' genome is a random construct. Afterword: Dr. Yeadon.
And, for new subscribers and beginners : Simple basics of the Freedom of Information Act and the recommendation of Christine Massey's articles.
Suavek
Mar 24, 2025
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-16
Katherine Watt: Illusion that 'something is spreading'. Ben/US Mortality-Substack: The alleged 'SARS-CoV-2' genome is a random construct. Afterword: Dr. Yeadon.
And, for new subscribers and beginners : Simple basics of the Freedom of Information Act and the recommendation of Christine Massey's articles.
Suavek
Mar 24, 2025
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-16
The paid preachers of the completely fabricated "pandemic" admit the truth only piecemeal. Dr. Leana Wen, a CNN medical analyst, is one example. The SARS-CoV-2 lie continues to be perpetuated. Whoever owns the media determines what the "truth" is.
Dr. Leana Wen Admits Some COVID 'Conspiracy Theories' Were Actually True
by Tyler Durden
Tuesday, Mar 18, 2025
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/dr-leana-wen-admits-some-covid-conspiracy-theories-were-actually-true
Dr. Leana Wen Admits Some COVID 'Conspiracy Theories' Were Actually True
by Tyler Durden
Tuesday, Mar 18, 2025
https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/dr-leana-wen-admits-some-covid-conspiracy-theories-were-actually-true
"MANY wicked things came our way with the WHO’s pandemic declaration, including lies, democide, propaganda, coercion, force, and fear.
None was a novel spreading coronavirus."
"Something wicked this way comes"
Still asking: Was SARS-CoV-2 a spreading viral threat?
Jessica Hockett
Mar 24, 2025
https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/something-wicked-this-way-comes
None was a novel spreading coronavirus."
"Something wicked this way comes"
Still asking: Was SARS-CoV-2 a spreading viral threat?
Jessica Hockett
Mar 24, 2025
https://www.woodhouse76.com/p/something-wicked-this-way-comes
Woodhouse76
"Something wicked this way comes"
Still asking: Was SARS-CoV-2 a spreading viral threat?
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://julesonthebeach.substack.com/p/world-media-notified-of-dna-contamination
While it’s good that a well-known group of people have written to media organisations, I find the sole grounds, that there is apparently out-of-limits amounts of DNA in the injections, far from the strongest argument that could have been used.
I’ve previously expressed my concern that “DNA contamination”, if heard by the public, would most likely to interpreted as having arisen through careless manufacturing & inadequate regulation.
Clearly, this isn’t how it arose at all.
Please see my post.
Best wishes
Mike
While it’s good that a well-known group of people have written to media organisations, I find the sole grounds, that there is apparently out-of-limits amounts of DNA in the injections, far from the strongest argument that could have been used.
I’ve previously expressed my concern that “DNA contamination”, if heard by the public, would most likely to interpreted as having arisen through careless manufacturing & inadequate regulation.
Clearly, this isn’t how it arose at all.
Please see my post.
Best wishes
Mike
🔥1
TOXIC BY DESIGN - PART 22.
Dr. Mike Yeadon : The harms they have produced is unequivocally intentional.
The toxicity of the injections is just one more piece of evidence among many of the intent to cause harm, but not the only one.
Suavek
Mar 25, 2025
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/toxic-by-design-part-22-dr-mike-yeadon
Dr. Mike Yeadon : The harms they have produced is unequivocally intentional.
The toxicity of the injections is just one more piece of evidence among many of the intent to cause harm, but not the only one.
Suavek
Mar 25, 2025
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/toxic-by-design-part-22-dr-mike-yeadon
Forwarded from The Solari Report
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Refuse to Go All Digital
“A long shot is better than no shot.”
Full Report: https://home.solari.com/3rd-quarter-2024-wrap-up-news-trends-stories-part-i-stories-1-3-with-dr-joseph-p-farrell/
Subscribe to Solari | Follow @solarireport
“A long shot is better than no shot.”
Full Report: https://home.solari.com/3rd-quarter-2024-wrap-up-news-trends-stories-part-i-stories-1-3-with-dr-joseph-p-farrell/
Subscribe to Solari | Follow @solarireport
The Roulette with Conventional "Vaccinations" - PART 14.
Dr. Mike Yeadon on the flu "vaccination".
Tips for great websites with useful links.
Vaccination is child abuse and a crime against humanity.
Suavek
Mar 29, 2025
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-roulette-with-conventional-vaccinations-97a
Dr. Mike Yeadon on the flu "vaccination".
Tips for great websites with useful links.
Vaccination is child abuse and a crime against humanity.
Suavek
Mar 29, 2025
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-roulette-with-conventional-vaccinations-97a
The Arguments for “NO VIRUS”-PART 17.
The involuntary humour of Dr. Meryl Nass. Do the perpetrators have anything to do with "No Virus"? Foreword by Dr. Mike Yeadon.
Do "Covid" preachers dislike the NO VIRUS narrative? Why? Life Is Beautiful !
Suavek
Mar 30, 2025
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-17
The involuntary humour of Dr. Meryl Nass. Do the perpetrators have anything to do with "No Virus"? Foreword by Dr. Mike Yeadon.
Do "Covid" preachers dislike the NO VIRUS narrative? Why? Life Is Beautiful !
Suavek
Mar 30, 2025
https://suavek1.substack.com/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-17
👍1
Forwarded from Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel (Mike Yeadon)
https://open.substack.com/pub/suavek1/p/the-arguments-for-no-virus-part-17
I think this is a very important article by Suavek.
Those of us who are not spooks, nor are working for the perpetrators, don’t appreciate how easily we are manipulated by professionals, schooled in the dark arts of propaganda. So we’re probably not even looking out for bad actors and odd behaviour. However, it’s all around us. I find them amusing and rather pathetic.
Suavek asks some good questions about whether an extreme form of what perpetrators call “the no virus movement” is in fact a group of wreckers working for the perpetrators? I think there is. The objective is, I think, to dissuade normal people from plunging in and making their own mind up about the reality of the situation.
If it’s made horribly caustic and insulting even hanging around a channel, many people will be put off from making the effort of discovering for oneself.
The perpetrators love that. Every person who understands WHY the claims for the existence of viruses, for contagion and for vaccines are all utter BS & lies, making claims that sound scientific but are no such thing, is the beginning of the end for their incredibly powerful propaganda of fearful illnesses. You cannot help but pass on some of these self discovered truths to others from time to time.
You gaining that personal insight is arguably the single most powerful & revolutionary act you could possibly make.
I think this is a very important article by Suavek.
Those of us who are not spooks, nor are working for the perpetrators, don’t appreciate how easily we are manipulated by professionals, schooled in the dark arts of propaganda. So we’re probably not even looking out for bad actors and odd behaviour. However, it’s all around us. I find them amusing and rather pathetic.
Suavek asks some good questions about whether an extreme form of what perpetrators call “the no virus movement” is in fact a group of wreckers working for the perpetrators? I think there is. The objective is, I think, to dissuade normal people from plunging in and making their own mind up about the reality of the situation.
If it’s made horribly caustic and insulting even hanging around a channel, many people will be put off from making the effort of discovering for oneself.
The perpetrators love that. Every person who understands WHY the claims for the existence of viruses, for contagion and for vaccines are all utter BS & lies, making claims that sound scientific but are no such thing, is the beginning of the end for their incredibly powerful propaganda of fearful illnesses. You cannot help but pass on some of these self discovered truths to others from time to time.
You gaining that personal insight is arguably the single most powerful & revolutionary act you could possibly make.
Substack
The Arguments for “NO VIRUS”-PART 17. The involuntary humour of Dr. Meryl Nass. Do the perpetrators have anything to do with "No…
Do "Covid" preachers dislike the NO VIRUS narrative? Why? Life Is Beautiful !
👍1
My collaboration with Dr. Mike Yeadon is bearing fruit. However, the political-medical fraud seems so deep that many people lack the imagination to comprehend it. Unfortunately, there's nothing I can do about it, except to point out our decades of indoctrination:
My Substack ( Fraud Prevention Hotline ) : suavek1.substack.com
Best wishes,
Suavek
My Substack ( Fraud Prevention Hotline ) : suavek1.substack.com
Best wishes,
Suavek
👍1