This article is nothing special from the US perspective. From the point of view of the EU vassal states, however, it is explosive power. Very useful in persuasion !
A REVELATION WITH EXPLOSIVE POWER :
FACE MASKS ONLY AS A DEFIANCE TO THE REPUBLICANS. AND THEN THE US VASSAL STATES WERE COMMITTED TO THIS NONSENSE.
AND YOU THOUGHT IT WAS ABOUT YOUR HEALTH ?
Vinay Prasad on Substack in his article "Boston University School of Public Health Stops Using Twitter" writes :
"Dr. Fauci changed his guidance on universal masking in public within a matter of 6 weeks at the beginning of the pandemic when not a single shred of new scientific evidence on this topic had been published in the interim. He either lied the first time or the second time. My own view of the matter is that he said then, and continues to say now, that which he believes is the politically expedient, somewhat left of center position, which he will change in subtle ways based on his reading of the public's mood."
(…)
"Public health has a huge problem. In the mind of the public, it is increasingly an extension of extreme liberal politics. It is the woke-wing of the Democratic’s #FollowTheScience. Political considerations appear to trump evidence and reason.
US Public health wanted to mask 2 year olds— not because data supported that choice— but because it was the most extreme political counter-reaction to Trump. US public health refused to listen to WHO or UNICEF. US Public health wanted to close schools merely because Trump wanted to open them— even if it meant horrific consequences to a generation of children. Public health professors routinely tweet open endorsements of Democratic candidates, but, let me be clear, I have never once seen a faculty member at a US school of public health tweet support for a Republican.
I worry that Dean Galea’s essay just deepens this polarization. He writes, “It is also important to acknowledge how our choice to leave Twitter reflects a degree of privilege on our part, in our expectation of having other places to go for our communications.” Is the implication here that some people lack the privilege to quit twitter? As far as I can tell the privilege to not use social media is something that all people enjoy, and as such, I wouldn’t even call it a privilege. You can always do your talking by talking."
https://sensiblemed.substack.com/p/boston-university-school-of-public?r=14jb45&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
A REVELATION WITH EXPLOSIVE POWER :
FACE MASKS ONLY AS A DEFIANCE TO THE REPUBLICANS. AND THEN THE US VASSAL STATES WERE COMMITTED TO THIS NONSENSE.
AND YOU THOUGHT IT WAS ABOUT YOUR HEALTH ?
Vinay Prasad on Substack in his article "Boston University School of Public Health Stops Using Twitter" writes :
"Dr. Fauci changed his guidance on universal masking in public within a matter of 6 weeks at the beginning of the pandemic when not a single shred of new scientific evidence on this topic had been published in the interim. He either lied the first time or the second time. My own view of the matter is that he said then, and continues to say now, that which he believes is the politically expedient, somewhat left of center position, which he will change in subtle ways based on his reading of the public's mood."
(…)
"Public health has a huge problem. In the mind of the public, it is increasingly an extension of extreme liberal politics. It is the woke-wing of the Democratic’s #FollowTheScience. Political considerations appear to trump evidence and reason.
US Public health wanted to mask 2 year olds— not because data supported that choice— but because it was the most extreme political counter-reaction to Trump. US public health refused to listen to WHO or UNICEF. US Public health wanted to close schools merely because Trump wanted to open them— even if it meant horrific consequences to a generation of children. Public health professors routinely tweet open endorsements of Democratic candidates, but, let me be clear, I have never once seen a faculty member at a US school of public health tweet support for a Republican.
I worry that Dean Galea’s essay just deepens this polarization. He writes, “It is also important to acknowledge how our choice to leave Twitter reflects a degree of privilege on our part, in our expectation of having other places to go for our communications.” Is the implication here that some people lack the privilege to quit twitter? As far as I can tell the privilege to not use social media is something that all people enjoy, and as such, I wouldn’t even call it a privilege. You can always do your talking by talking."
https://sensiblemed.substack.com/p/boston-university-school-of-public?r=14jb45&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
Sensible Medicine
Boston University School of Public Health Stops Using Twitter
A justified choice or performative theater? And does it advance public health?
Forwarded from Queue for brain
This article is nothing special from the US perspective. From the point of view of the EU vassal states, however, it is extreme spregstoff. Very useful in persuasion !
A REVELATION WITH EXPLOSIVE POWER :
FACE MASKS ONLY AS A DEFIANCE TO THE REPUBLICANS. AND THEN THE US VASSAL STATES WERE COMMITTED TO THIS NONSENSE.
AND YOU THOUGHT IT WAS ABOUT YOUR HEALTH ?
Vinay Prasad on Substack in his article "Boston University School of Public Health Stops Using Twitter" writes :
"Dr. Fauci changed his guidance on universal masking in public within a matter of 6 weeks at the beginning of the pandemic when not a single shred of new scientific evidence on this topic had been published in the interim. He either lied the first time or the second time. My own view of the matter is that he said then, and continues to say now, that which he believes is the politically expedient, somewhat left of center position, which he will change in subtle ways based on his reading of the public's mood."
(…)
"Public health has a huge problem. In the mind of the public, it is increasingly an extension of extreme liberal politics. It is the woke-wing of the Democratic’s #FollowTheScience. Political considerations appear to trump evidence and reason.
US Public health wanted to mask 2 year olds— not because data supported that choice— but because it was the most extreme political counter-reaction to Trump. US public health refused to listen to WHO or UNICEF. US Public health wanted to close schools merely because Trump wanted to open them— even if it meant horrific consequences to a generation of children. Public health professors routinely tweet open endorsements of Democratic candidates, but, let me be clear, I have never once seen a faculty member at a US school of public health tweet support for a Republican.
I worry that Dean Galea’s essay just deepens this polarization. He writes, “It is also important to acknowledge how our choice to leave Twitter reflects a degree of privilege on our part, in our expectation of having other places to go for our communications.” Is the implication here that some people lack the privilege to quit twitter? As far as I can tell the privilege to not use social media is something that all people enjoy, and as such, I wouldn’t even call it a privilege. You can always do your talking by talking."
https://sensiblemed.substack.com/p/boston-university-school-of-public?r=14jb45&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
A REVELATION WITH EXPLOSIVE POWER :
FACE MASKS ONLY AS A DEFIANCE TO THE REPUBLICANS. AND THEN THE US VASSAL STATES WERE COMMITTED TO THIS NONSENSE.
AND YOU THOUGHT IT WAS ABOUT YOUR HEALTH ?
Vinay Prasad on Substack in his article "Boston University School of Public Health Stops Using Twitter" writes :
"Dr. Fauci changed his guidance on universal masking in public within a matter of 6 weeks at the beginning of the pandemic when not a single shred of new scientific evidence on this topic had been published in the interim. He either lied the first time or the second time. My own view of the matter is that he said then, and continues to say now, that which he believes is the politically expedient, somewhat left of center position, which he will change in subtle ways based on his reading of the public's mood."
(…)
"Public health has a huge problem. In the mind of the public, it is increasingly an extension of extreme liberal politics. It is the woke-wing of the Democratic’s #FollowTheScience. Political considerations appear to trump evidence and reason.
US Public health wanted to mask 2 year olds— not because data supported that choice— but because it was the most extreme political counter-reaction to Trump. US public health refused to listen to WHO or UNICEF. US Public health wanted to close schools merely because Trump wanted to open them— even if it meant horrific consequences to a generation of children. Public health professors routinely tweet open endorsements of Democratic candidates, but, let me be clear, I have never once seen a faculty member at a US school of public health tweet support for a Republican.
I worry that Dean Galea’s essay just deepens this polarization. He writes, “It is also important to acknowledge how our choice to leave Twitter reflects a degree of privilege on our part, in our expectation of having other places to go for our communications.” Is the implication here that some people lack the privilege to quit twitter? As far as I can tell the privilege to not use social media is something that all people enjoy, and as such, I wouldn’t even call it a privilege. You can always do your talking by talking."
https://sensiblemed.substack.com/p/boston-university-school-of-public?r=14jb45&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
Sensible Medicine
Boston University School of Public Health Stops Using Twitter
A justified choice or performative theater? And does it advance public health?
Dieser Artikel ist aus der Sicht der US-Bürger nichts Aussergewöhnliches. Aus der Sicht der Bürger der EU-Vasallenstaaten stellt er jedoch einen Spregstoff dar. Sehr nützlich für die Überzeugungs- / Öffentlichkeitsarbeit!
EINE ENTHÜLLUNG MIT SPRENGKRAFT :
GESICHTSMASKEN NUR ALS TROTZ DEN REPUBLIKANERN GEGENÜBER. UND DANN WURDEN DIE US-VASALLEN-STAATEN ZU DIESEM UNSINN VERPFLICHTET.
UND DU DACHTEST, DASS ES UM DEINE GESUNDHEIT GEHT ?
Vinay Prasad auf Substack in seinem Artikel "Boston University School of Public Health Stops Using Twitter" schreibt :
"(...) Dr. Fauci änderte seine Anleitung zum universellen Maskieren in der Öffentlichkeit innerhalb von 6 Wochen zu Beginn der Pandemie, als in der Zwischenzeit kein einziger Fetzen neuer wissenschaftlicher Beweise zu diesem Thema veröffentlicht worden war. Er hat entweder beim ersten oder beim zweiten Mal gelogen. (...) "
"(...) Die öffentliche Gesundheit hat ein riesiges Problem. Im Bewusstsein der Öffentlichkeit ist sie zunehmend eine Verlängerung extrem liberaler Politik. Es ist der wache Flügel von #FollowTheScience der Demokraten. Politische Erwägungen scheinen Beweise und Vernunft zu übertrumpfen. Das US-Gesundheitsministerium wollte 2-Jährige maskieren – nicht weil die Daten diese Entscheidung unterstützten – sondern weil es die extremste politische Gegenreaktion auf Trump war. Das öffentliche Gesundheitswesen der USA weigerte sich, auf die WHO oder UNICEF zu hören. Das US-Gesundheitsministerium wollte Schulen schließen, nur weil Trump sie öffnen wollte – auch wenn dies schreckliche Folgen für eine Generation von Kindern bedeutete. Professoren für öffentliche Gesundheit twittern routinemäßig offene Befürwortungen demokratischer Kandidaten, aber um es klar zu sagen, ich habe noch nie ein Fakultätsmitglied an einer US-Schule für öffentliche Gesundheit gesehen, das Unterstützung für einen Republikaner twittert. (...) "
https://sensiblemed.substack.com/p/boston-university-school-of-public?r=14jb45&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
EINE ENTHÜLLUNG MIT SPRENGKRAFT :
GESICHTSMASKEN NUR ALS TROTZ DEN REPUBLIKANERN GEGENÜBER. UND DANN WURDEN DIE US-VASALLEN-STAATEN ZU DIESEM UNSINN VERPFLICHTET.
UND DU DACHTEST, DASS ES UM DEINE GESUNDHEIT GEHT ?
Vinay Prasad auf Substack in seinem Artikel "Boston University School of Public Health Stops Using Twitter" schreibt :
"(...) Dr. Fauci änderte seine Anleitung zum universellen Maskieren in der Öffentlichkeit innerhalb von 6 Wochen zu Beginn der Pandemie, als in der Zwischenzeit kein einziger Fetzen neuer wissenschaftlicher Beweise zu diesem Thema veröffentlicht worden war. Er hat entweder beim ersten oder beim zweiten Mal gelogen. (...) "
"(...) Die öffentliche Gesundheit hat ein riesiges Problem. Im Bewusstsein der Öffentlichkeit ist sie zunehmend eine Verlängerung extrem liberaler Politik. Es ist der wache Flügel von #FollowTheScience der Demokraten. Politische Erwägungen scheinen Beweise und Vernunft zu übertrumpfen. Das US-Gesundheitsministerium wollte 2-Jährige maskieren – nicht weil die Daten diese Entscheidung unterstützten – sondern weil es die extremste politische Gegenreaktion auf Trump war. Das öffentliche Gesundheitswesen der USA weigerte sich, auf die WHO oder UNICEF zu hören. Das US-Gesundheitsministerium wollte Schulen schließen, nur weil Trump sie öffnen wollte – auch wenn dies schreckliche Folgen für eine Generation von Kindern bedeutete. Professoren für öffentliche Gesundheit twittern routinemäßig offene Befürwortungen demokratischer Kandidaten, aber um es klar zu sagen, ich habe noch nie ein Fakultätsmitglied an einer US-Schule für öffentliche Gesundheit gesehen, das Unterstützung für einen Republikaner twittert. (...) "
https://sensiblemed.substack.com/p/boston-university-school-of-public?r=14jb45&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=email
Sensible Medicine
Boston University School of Public Health Stops Using Twitter
A justified choice or performative theater? And does it advance public health?