The Peaboys and their papa, Prince Caspian.
---
Caspian is very patient with the two boys - and tolerates them tagging along as he makes his daily rounds about the farm.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
---
Caspian is very patient with the two boys - and tolerates them tagging along as he makes his daily rounds about the farm.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
❤156👏15
Well Being: Source Your Food More Deliberately
Small choices add up to big changes.
Not everyone can grow their own food, and even committed gardeners and homesteaders cannot produce everything they need. Sourcing is the bridge: the set of choices you make when you buy rather than grow.
Below are some concrete ideas for improving your and your family’s diet and living a higher-quality life:
---
Find your local farmers. Farmers’ markets are the obvious starting point, but they are not the only ones. Many farms sell directly through CSA arrangements, roadside stands, on-farm stores, or informal networks of regular customers. Buying directly from a farmer you know and can ask questions of is categorically different from buying a product with a label that claims “farm fresh.” about the animal.
---
We buy a quarter of a cow at a time from a neighboring farmer whose practices we know and trust. The animal is grass-finished, processed locally by a small-scale butcher, packaged and labeled. A quarter cow lasts us nearly a year. The per-pound cost for high-quality, pasture-raised beef is lower than what we would pay for equivalent cuts at a specialty grocery store, and dramatically richer in terms of what we know
---
Understand what the labels mean and do not mean.
To read more tips, go to:
https://www.malone.news/p/well-being-source-your-food-more
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Small choices add up to big changes.
Not everyone can grow their own food, and even committed gardeners and homesteaders cannot produce everything they need. Sourcing is the bridge: the set of choices you make when you buy rather than grow.
Below are some concrete ideas for improving your and your family’s diet and living a higher-quality life:
---
Find your local farmers. Farmers’ markets are the obvious starting point, but they are not the only ones. Many farms sell directly through CSA arrangements, roadside stands, on-farm stores, or informal networks of regular customers. Buying directly from a farmer you know and can ask questions of is categorically different from buying a product with a label that claims “farm fresh.” about the animal.
---
We buy a quarter of a cow at a time from a neighboring farmer whose practices we know and trust. The animal is grass-finished, processed locally by a small-scale butcher, packaged and labeled. A quarter cow lasts us nearly a year. The per-pound cost for high-quality, pasture-raised beef is lower than what we would pay for equivalent cuts at a specialty grocery store, and dramatically richer in terms of what we know
---
Understand what the labels mean and do not mean.
To read more tips, go to:
https://www.malone.news/p/well-being-source-your-food-more
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
👍71❤27👏8
Media is too big
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Discover Clear Vision Breakthrough – your path to naturally improved eyesight!
This groundbreaking program unlocks the secrets to enhancing your vision without surgery or medication.
Picture yourself enjoying crystal-clear vision in just weeks!
Say goodbye to eye strain and hello to a world in high definition.
With easy-to-follow exercises and proven techniques, you'll be amazed at how quickly your eyesight improves.
Join countless others who've already sharpened their vision naturally.
Don't let blurry vision blur your life's experiences!
Click now to start your journey towards clearer, healthier eyes today!
https://shortll.com/iGenicsPro
https://shortll.com/iGenicsPro
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤣9❤6👍2👌2🤡2
Forwarded from COVID19 VACCINE VICTIMS AND FAMILIES
The year is 1950. Your doctor lights a cigarette and tells you smoking is fine. He read it in a study. He is telling the truth about having read it. He does not know, or is not saying, that the study was funded by the tobacco industry.
The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.
The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.
The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.
The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.
The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.
The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.
He is confident.
He has always been confident.
The confidence has never been the problem.
The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.
Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES
The year is 1958. Your doctor tells you to eat less fat. The evidence is contested. The contestation is not in the public messaging. The food industry has been helpful in clarifying which findings deserve attention. Some researchers who published contradictory data have been quietly defunded. Ancel Keys is on the cover of Time magazine.
The year is 1962. Your doctor prescribes thalidomide to your pregnant wife for morning sickness. It has been approved. The FDA gave it the green light in Europe. Twelve thousand children will be born with severe limb malformations before anyone in an official capacity acknowledges the problem. The families are told the drug was safe. The drug was approved. Both of these things remain true.
The year is 1972. Your doctor prescribes Valium. Britain is in the grip of a benzodiazepine wave that will last two decades. The dependency risk is known internally. It is not shared. Your doctor is not lying to you. He was not told either.
The year is 1999. Your doctor prescribes Vioxx for your arthritis. It is newer than ibuprofen, well-tolerated, and Merck has a study showing it works. Merck also has internal data suggesting it roughly doubles the risk of heart attack. This data will not reach your doctor for four more years. Fifty thousand people are estimated to have died in the interim. Merck eventually settles for 4.85 billion dollars. No criminal charges are brought.
The year is 2002. Your doctor prescribes OxyContin. Purdue Pharma trained its sales representatives to tell doctors the addiction risk was less than one percent. That figure came from a letter, not a study. The letter was about patients with terminal cancer on short-term doses in hospital settings. Your doctor is a GP with a patient who has a bad back. Nobody draws a distinction. Nobody is required to.
The year is 2008. Your doctor checks your cholesterol. Your LDL is elevated. You are prescribed a statin. Nobody mentions that the number needed to treat for primary prevention is approximately 250. Nobody mentions that the muscle deterioration you'll notice over the next two years is listed as a rare side effect rather than a documented pattern affecting a meaningful percentage of patients. The trial that informed the prescription was funded by the manufacturer.
Now it is today.
Your doctor has new guidelines. New studies. New consensus.
He is confident.
He has always been confident.
The confidence has never been the problem.
The confidence is, in fact, precisely the problem.
Join ➣ 👉@COVID19VACCINEVICTIMSANDFAMILIES
🔥106👍36💯33❤24😢4
Seems like a no-brainer to have a secure ballroom at the White House. It is almost like those on the far left want the president to get shot…
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
💯139🤮6🤡3❤1😁1
Forwarded from Trump Source ⚡️ 🇺🇸
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
🤬91🙏27🤡15❤2
Looked at the headlines this morning on Google - not a single MSM "news" outlet called this an assassination attempt or even an "alleged" assassination attempt.
Instead, this is what is in the headlines: "alleged" gunman, "shooting suspect," "shooter," and "dinner gunman. "
The propaganda and spin never ends.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Instead, this is what is in the headlines: "alleged" gunman, "shooting suspect," "shooter," and "dinner gunman. "
The propaganda and spin never ends.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
🤡96🤬87💯13❤7🔥5⚡4👏3😢1
Is that a paper or a cloth mask on Taylor Lorenz last night at the White House Correspondents' Association dinner? It makes a difference, as one is so much better than the other, right?
Cause we all know that cloth looks so much classier when wearing formal attire - paper just looks cheap. (snigger).
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Cause we all know that cloth looks so much classier when wearing formal attire - paper just looks cheap. (snigger).
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
🤡182🤣57😁8❤5👍1🔥1🤬1
Sunday Strip: "Maximum Warfare" -
Three strikes against them.
https://www.malone.news/p/sunday-strip-maximum-warfare
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Three strikes against them.
https://www.malone.news/p/sunday-strip-maximum-warfare
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
www.malone.news
Sunday Strip: "Maximum Warfare" -
Three strikes against them.
👍64🤣25❤12😁4🤡3🥴1
Why Substack hates Malone News … and me
There is a simpler explanation than most people want to admit, and it has very little to do with subscriber counts, writing quality, or even real-world influence.
It has everything to do with signaling.
Over the weekend, Substack hosted its high-profile “New Media Party” during White House Correspondents’ Dinner weekend. This was not just another cocktail gathering. It was a carefully curated room. A statement about what “new media” is supposed to look like when presented to Washington, to legacy press, and to power.
And that is where the disconnect begins.
The Malone News subscription base is large by any reasonable metric. Hundreds of thousands of subscribers. Deep engagement. A loyal readership that does not just skim headlines but actually reads, shares, and acts. By the numbers, it sits comfortably in the upper tier of the platform.
But that is not the currency being spent in a room like that.
The real currency is legibility to the system.
The invite list tilted toward a specific type of writer. Former legacy and mostly journalists who migrated to Substack but still speak the language of institutions and don’t advocate too strongly for conservative principles. Who was invited? Policy and tech commentators who circulate comfortably in think tanks, venture circles, and media panels. Creator personalities who bring energy without bringing risk. And, perhaps most importantly, people who are already embedded in the Substack social network, cross-promoting, collaborating, and showing up in the same rooms, over and over again. Promoted substackers that feature a familiar frame of reference over content.
I am not alone in being isolated from Substack promotions. Jeffrey Tucker, Alex Berenson, and I are three accounts that two independent AI analyses identified as outside the inner circle and not receiving amplification from the Substack leadership. This is just another form of shadow-banning of those who speak truth to power. So, what else is new?
This is not accidental. It is brand construction.
Substack is trying to tell a story about itself. Not as a rebellion, but as an evolution. Not as a break from the system, but as its next iteration. The platform wants to be seen as the future of journalism, not its adversary.
That story requires a certain kind of protagonist.
Writers who challenge institutions in controlled, acceptable ways can be featured. Writers who question assumptions while remaining inside the bounds of polite discourse can be elevated. Even contrarians are welcome, as long as they remain within a range that does not disrupt the room.
But there is a line.
And Malone News sits on the other side of it.
The publication is not just “heterodox.” It is openly adversarial to major public health narratives, to pharmaceutical industry practices, and to the institutional frameworks that dominated the COVID era. Whether one agrees with those positions or not is almost beside the point. What matters is how they are perceived in a high-visibility, mixed-audience environment.
In that context, the issue is not reach. It is risk.
A curated event tied to the White House Correspondents’ Dinner is not the place where organizers experiment with reputational ambiguity. The goal is a room that feels coherent, controlled, and aligned with the image being projected outward. That means minimizing the chance of friction, controversy, or uncomfortable conversations that could spill beyond the venue’s walls.
So the filtering happens quietly.
Not through public criteria. Not through transparent standards. But through network pathways, personal connections, and an unspoken understanding of who fits the narrative and who does not.
There is another factor that matters more than most people realize. The social graph.
👇 Read more 👇
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
There is a simpler explanation than most people want to admit, and it has very little to do with subscriber counts, writing quality, or even real-world influence.
It has everything to do with signaling.
Over the weekend, Substack hosted its high-profile “New Media Party” during White House Correspondents’ Dinner weekend. This was not just another cocktail gathering. It was a carefully curated room. A statement about what “new media” is supposed to look like when presented to Washington, to legacy press, and to power.
And that is where the disconnect begins.
The Malone News subscription base is large by any reasonable metric. Hundreds of thousands of subscribers. Deep engagement. A loyal readership that does not just skim headlines but actually reads, shares, and acts. By the numbers, it sits comfortably in the upper tier of the platform.
But that is not the currency being spent in a room like that.
The real currency is legibility to the system.
The invite list tilted toward a specific type of writer. Former legacy and mostly journalists who migrated to Substack but still speak the language of institutions and don’t advocate too strongly for conservative principles. Who was invited? Policy and tech commentators who circulate comfortably in think tanks, venture circles, and media panels. Creator personalities who bring energy without bringing risk. And, perhaps most importantly, people who are already embedded in the Substack social network, cross-promoting, collaborating, and showing up in the same rooms, over and over again. Promoted substackers that feature a familiar frame of reference over content.
I am not alone in being isolated from Substack promotions. Jeffrey Tucker, Alex Berenson, and I are three accounts that two independent AI analyses identified as outside the inner circle and not receiving amplification from the Substack leadership. This is just another form of shadow-banning of those who speak truth to power. So, what else is new?
This is not accidental. It is brand construction.
Substack is trying to tell a story about itself. Not as a rebellion, but as an evolution. Not as a break from the system, but as its next iteration. The platform wants to be seen as the future of journalism, not its adversary.
That story requires a certain kind of protagonist.
Writers who challenge institutions in controlled, acceptable ways can be featured. Writers who question assumptions while remaining inside the bounds of polite discourse can be elevated. Even contrarians are welcome, as long as they remain within a range that does not disrupt the room.
But there is a line.
And Malone News sits on the other side of it.
The publication is not just “heterodox.” It is openly adversarial to major public health narratives, to pharmaceutical industry practices, and to the institutional frameworks that dominated the COVID era. Whether one agrees with those positions or not is almost beside the point. What matters is how they are perceived in a high-visibility, mixed-audience environment.
In that context, the issue is not reach. It is risk.
A curated event tied to the White House Correspondents’ Dinner is not the place where organizers experiment with reputational ambiguity. The goal is a room that feels coherent, controlled, and aligned with the image being projected outward. That means minimizing the chance of friction, controversy, or uncomfortable conversations that could spill beyond the venue’s walls.
So the filtering happens quietly.
Not through public criteria. Not through transparent standards. But through network pathways, personal connections, and an unspoken understanding of who fits the narrative and who does not.
There is another factor that matters more than most people realize. The social graph.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍63💯36❤22🙏11🤬8🤔6👎1🔥1🤡1
Robert W Malone, MD
Why Substack hates Malone News … and me There is a simpler explanation than most people want to admit, and it has very little to do with subscriber counts, writing quality, or even real-world influence. It has everything to do with signaling. Over the weekend…
Substack is not just a publishing platform. It is a network. Invitations tend to flow through that network. Writers who collaborate, who appear on each other’s podcasts and broadcasts, who share audiences and relationships, naturally end up in the same physical spaces. Those who operate outside that web, even if they are larger or more influential in absolute terms, often remain invisible when lists are made.
Malone News has a large audience, but it is not deeply interwoven with the Substack-to-Substack ecosystem or the Washington media circuit. It operates in a parallel lane. That independence is a strength in one sense, but it comes with a cost in environments that are driven by proximity and familiarity. In other words, the insider club.
Put all of that together, and the outcome is predictable.
It is not that Substack “hates” Malone news in any literal sense (they apparently just hate their politics). That framing is emotionally satisfying, but analytically incomplete. What is really happening is more structural.
The platform is curating a version of “new media” that is:
-Connected to existing power centers
-Acceptable within institutional frameworks
-Networked within its own internal ecosystem
-Safe enough to showcase in front of Washington
Basically, they are recreating the old media, just on a newer, more hip social networking platform.
Malone News does not check those boxes. Not because it lacks influence, but because it represents a different kind of influence. One that is less dependent on institutional validation and less interested in maintaining alignment with it.
And that kind of independence does not translate well into curated rooms designed for signaling.
The irony is that exclusion from that room does not indicate weakness. It indicates the opposite. A different audience. A different network. A different center of gravity.
In the end, the question is not why Malone News was not invited, we all know why.
The question is what kind of media ecosystem requires that kind of filtering in the first place?
The new media ecosystem. Same as the old media ecosystem.
Did you expect anything different?
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯92👍18🙏15❤5🤬5🤨4🤔2🤡2⚡1🔥1
And yet here we are...
Thanks to the RINO Congress critters that sided with the Demoncrats, this is coming our way in 2027.
Used cars are going to sky rocket in value...
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Thanks to the RINO Congress critters that sided with the Demoncrats, this is coming our way in 2027.
Used cars are going to sky rocket in value...
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
🤬128💯75👏13🤮7❤6😱1
Presidential assassination attempts are becoming normalized by the mainstream media and the Democrat party.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
💯120🤬36🤡10😢6❤2🥱2🔥1
I stand by my President, but that doesn't mean I agree with everything he does, cause I don't - it means that he is light years ahead of the alternative.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
💯205👍26❤6🤣5🤡4👏2🥱1
The "Kill" Switch
When software and the government control our daily lives.
"...At first, it arrives quietly. It starts in higher-end vehicles and works its way down. It is marketed as safety, convenience, and common sense. Insurance companies offer discounts if you agree to monitoring. Most people say yes. Why not save a few hundred dollars? Over time, the discount becomes the baseline. Opting out starts to cost you. Driving an older car, free of monitoring devices, will cost you, or maybe even make you uninsurable. The “choice” remains on paper, but in practice it fades.
This is a slow ratchet. The frog put in a pot of water as the heat is slowly turned up. Before he knows it and can jump out, he has been boiled alive. Control does not have to be imposed directly when it can be engineered through incentives. If your premiums, your financing, and eventually your access to services and cars depend on how a system scores your behavior, then the system does not need a kill switch."
Read more of the essay at:
https://www.malone.news/p/the-kill-switch
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
When software and the government control our daily lives.
"...At first, it arrives quietly. It starts in higher-end vehicles and works its way down. It is marketed as safety, convenience, and common sense. Insurance companies offer discounts if you agree to monitoring. Most people say yes. Why not save a few hundred dollars? Over time, the discount becomes the baseline. Opting out starts to cost you. Driving an older car, free of monitoring devices, will cost you, or maybe even make you uninsurable. The “choice” remains on paper, but in practice it fades.
This is a slow ratchet. The frog put in a pot of water as the heat is slowly turned up. Before he knows it and can jump out, he has been boiled alive. Control does not have to be imposed directly when it can be engineered through incentives. If your premiums, your financing, and eventually your access to services and cars depend on how a system scores your behavior, then the system does not need a kill switch."
Read more of the essay at:
https://www.malone.news/p/the-kill-switch
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
www.malone.news
The "Kill" Switch
When software and the government control our daily lives
🤬95💯55🙏9❤5👎5🔥4
Dr. David Morens, ex-NIAID employee, was charged with conspiracy against the U.S.; destruction, alteration, or falsification of records in federal investigations; concealment, removal, or mutilation of records; and aiding and abetting. He faces a maximum penalty of 5 years in prison for the conspiracy charge; a max of 20 years for each count of destruction, alteration, or falsification of records; and a max 3 years for each count of concealment, removal, or mutilation of records.
“The House Oversight Committee’s Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic uncovered evidence revealing Dr. Morens – a top advisor to Dr. Fauci – intentionally took action to conceal and falsify records about the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic. We caught Dr. Morens red-handed as he boasted in emails about how the ‘FOIA lady’ coached him on how to hide records and cover-up information. I applaud the Trump Justice Department for taking action to hold this public official accountable for hiding information from the American people. No one is above the law and under the Trump Administration, overdue accountability is finally here,” said Chairman Comer.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
“The House Oversight Committee’s Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Pandemic uncovered evidence revealing Dr. Morens – a top advisor to Dr. Fauci – intentionally took action to conceal and falsify records about the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic. We caught Dr. Morens red-handed as he boasted in emails about how the ‘FOIA lady’ coached him on how to hide records and cover-up information. I applaud the Trump Justice Department for taking action to hold this public official accountable for hiding information from the American people. No one is above the law and under the Trump Administration, overdue accountability is finally here,” said Chairman Comer.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
👍150👏39❤28🙏11🤔6🤡4💯1
Yep. Did a recent article on the dangers of taking SSRIs during pregnancy
https://www.malone.news/p/the-rise-of-autism-becomes-clearer
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
https://www.malone.news/p/the-rise-of-autism-becomes-clearer
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
🤬130😢27🙏9⚡8💯8😱6❤4🤮3