DNI GABBARD REVEALS EVIDENCE OF U.S. TAXPAYER-FUNDED GLOBAL BIOLAB PROGRAM

Subscribe and share ➡️➡️ @TrumpSource

DNI Gabbard Reveals Evidence of U.S. Taxpayer-Funded Global Biolab Program
Press Release copied from the DNI Website

https://www.malone.news/p/dni-gabbard-reveals-evidence-of-us

📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

BREAKING- Very active rumor mill currently with specifics from senior USG (government) employees that RFKjr will be leaving as Secretary HHS in July, after the 4th. Meeting was apparently held last Monday. Oz to head transition team.

---

Reportedly widely and openly discussed during last Wednesday's Congressional baseball game.

📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

In Washington, people are rarely fired. They simply discover an overwhelming desire to spend more time with their family shortly after the President decides he would like someone else in the job.

---

A recurring feature of both Trump administrations has been the curious tendency for officials to leave shortly after reports emerge that the President has lost confidence in them. Officially, many departures are described as resignations, personal decisions, family considerations, or opportunities to pursue other interests. Unofficially, the timing often tells a different story.

---

Examples follow:

Kirstjen Nielsen
Faced repeated criticism from Trump over border policy.
Reports circulated that Trump was dissatisfied with DHS leadership.
Resigned shortly after a White House meeting.
Official narrative: resignation.
Widely viewed as a forced departure.

---

H.R. McMaster
Reports emerged that Trump wanted a different National Security Advisor.
Departed after months of speculation.
Official narrative: transition and resignation.
Widely viewed as a leadership change initiated by Trump.

---

John Kelly
Relationship with Trump reportedly deteriorated over time.
Persistent reports that Trump wanted new leadership in the Chief of Staff role.
Departure announced as a resignation.
Widely viewed as an exit requested by the President.

---

Jim Mattis
Publicly resigned following disagreements over Syria policy.
Official narrative: policy disagreement and resignation.
Reality: Trump and Mattis had fundamentally diverged on national security issues.

---

Tulsi Gabbard
Official explanation centered on her husband's serious health condition and a desire to care for family.
Simultaneously, reports emerged of disagreements over Iran policy and growing friction within the administration.
Additional reporting suggested some White House officials favored an accelerated transition.
Official narrative: family considerations.
Open question: purely personal decision, or personal reasons coinciding with political pressure?

---

Jeff Sessions
Trump publicly criticized him for months over Russia-related recusal decisions.
Reports repeatedly suggested Trump wanted him out.
Sessions submitted a resignation letter after the 2018 midterms.
Official narrative: resignation.
Widely understood: Trump wanted a new Attorney General.

---

Category A: Trump clearly wanted them out
Jeff Sessions
Kirstjen Nielsen
John Kelly
H.R. McMaster

Category B: Officially personal, but political tensions were obvious
Tulsi Gabbard
Dan Bongino
Jim Mattis

Category C: Direct firing, no "personal reasons" cover story
Pam Bondi
Rex Tillerson
Mike Waltz

---

HHS is denying the robust rumors that RFKjr is on his way out - given the pattern above, I am not ready to concede the strong possibility the July will see transition to a new Secretary. But as I originally posted, this must be considered a rumor at this time.

📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

The most advanced AI is now "too dangerous" for the public to use.
Too dangerous for independent scientists. For small labs. For you.
But safe for government and its approved partners.
The same government that funded gain-of-function research and hid it.
🧵

---

Strip away the language about safety and a doctrine appears:
Powerful capabilities, restricted for the public.
The same capabilities, retained for governments and the institutions they choose to trust.
The stated reason is biosecurity. The real effect is something else.

---

Before we hand control of these technologies to the government and its preferred partners, one question:
What is the track record of the institutions demanding that trust?
It is worth looking, because we already have years of evidence.

---

For years the federal apparatus funded, oversaw, defended, and obscured risky virology.
NIH money moved through a maze of grants, subcontracts, and foreign labs. EcoHealth. Wuhan.
Getting basic facts took subpoenas, whistleblowers, and litigation.
@SenRonJohnsonUS
@ RandPaul

---

Emails withheld. Records slow-walked. Definitions quietly changed.
That is not a system built for openness.
It is a system built to resist oversight. And it is the same system now asking for exclusive access to biological AI.

---

Congress held the hearings. Wrote the letters. Issued the subpoenas.
And the architecture is still standing. Same agencies. Same grant mechanisms. Same failures.
Congress has proven it can investigate. It has not proven it can govern.

---

This year NIH researchers were criminally charged over smuggling biological materials into the country, including mpox samples.
Institutions that cannot control pathogens already inside their own labs now ask to be trusted with AI that accelerates biology.
Why?

---

The biosecurity argument pretends "the government" is one careful actor.
It is not. It is a sprawl of agencies, contractors, universities, military and intelligence labs, and foreign partners.
Assigning the risk to "the government" does not solve it. It just moves it.

---

It gets worse. Intelligence officials have acknowledged biological research run through overseas partner labs, often sitting in conflict zones.
"Dual-function" is the polite word. It means work that serves biodefense or biowarfare, depending on who is asking.

---

Here is the part no one wants to say out loud:
Restricting Americans stops no one else. DeepSeek already proved frontier AI cannot be locked inside a few U.S. companies.
Knowledge crosses borders. China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea will not wait for permission.

---

So the policy does not remove the danger.
It concentrates the capability among states and large institutions, and hopes our rivals play along.
Americans and independent researchers get the restrictions. Foreign programs get the head start.

---

The public rationale is safety. The practical effect is the concentration of power.
Before surrendering these tools to the governing class, ask what it has done to earn the trust.
The honest answer: not much.
Full essay:
https://www.malone.news/p/the-ai-they-dont-want-you-to-have

📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

Robert Kennedy Jr. has done more as HHS Secretary than any HHS Secretary in my lifetime. He is cleaning up the food supply. He is removing chemical dyes from children's food, pulling heavy metals out of baby food, investigating microplastics and forever chemicals. And he is working to bring the childhood vaccine schedule down from 54 vaccines to 26.

That isn't a small thing.

Join @TheHigh_Wire

Sunday Strip: Money, Money, Money
Versus Central Committee control

https://www.malone.news/p/sunday-strip-money-money-money

📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

Elon Musk: “The reason I felt that it was important to acquire Twitter was because I could feel the walls closing in. It was outrageous that they suspended the account of a sitting president

And I think it was only a matter of time before they suspended my account.

Twitter and, well, pretty much all the social media companies, and Google and everyone, are controlled by far-left activists. That’s the truth of it.
How do you know what’s real when it’s all filtered through a far-left San Francisco Berkeley lens?

They just manipulate the truth constantly."

Subscribe and share 👉 @StormIsUponUsJM

How Big Pharma Silenced the White House A single poll of 1,000 people convinced the White House to tell Robert Kennedy Jr. to stop talking about vaccines. The full results of that same poll were hidden from Trump and his administration. The Daily Caller just published them.
@JeffereyJaxen
walks through the sequence. In December 2025, a Fabrizio poll of 1,000 voters in key House districts was circulated to the White House and picked up wall-to-wall by the New York Times and other outlets, with the message that vaccine skepticism was bad politics and that candidates who questioned childhood vaccine requirements would pay at the ballot box. Kennedy was told to stand down on vaccines and focus on food. The White House obliged. What the Daily Caller has now obtained is the rest of the Fabrizio data, from a poll conducted in October 2025 by Trump's own longtime pollster, that was never released. The suppressed results show that 73% of voters expressed concern about childhood vaccine mandates, 90% expressed concern about the pharmaceutical industry's corrupting influence over government, politics, medical research, and news coverage, and approximately 70% across all political affiliations want vaccine manufacturer blanket immunity lifted. Nearly seven in ten voters want more research into vaccines' cumulative effect on infants. The poll that shaped six months of White House vaccine policy told a fraction of the story. The rest was kept from Trump. Against that backdrop, Trump just signed an executive order directing the CDC and ACIP to review the scientific assessment and latest clinical data and take appropriate steps to update the childhood and adolescent vaccine schedule, with explicit language requiring that all actions fulfill legal obligations with respect to parental authority, religious freedom, disability accommodations, and equal protection. Dr. Robert Malone, former ACIP co-chair, describes the order as potentially changing the vaccine debate forever, because the phrase "to the extent permitted by law" restores executive branch authority over vaccination policy and strips ACIP of its de facto rule-making power, confining the committee to an advisory role rather than the policy-setting function it has exercised for decades. The Massachusetts judge's stay on the ACIP restructuring had put Kennedy's reform agenda on ice. This executive order moves around that roadblock. We should keep our eyes focused on the next ACIP meeting.

Join @TheHigh_Wire

Three years ago I wrote about berberine after hearing my friend Paul Marik discuss repurposed therapies. Back then almost nobody outside integrative medicine had heard of it. Today influencers call it "Nature's Ozempic." The truth is more interesting than the hype. 🧵

---

Let's kill the Ozempic comparison first. Berberine is not a GLP-1 agonist. It does not produce dramatic appetite suppression or rapid weight loss. It is a naturally occurring plant alkaloid that influences metabolism through many pathways at once.

---

One reason it draws so much attention: it activates AMPK, the body's cellular energy sensor. That means better glucose uptake, improved insulin sensitivity, more fat metabolism, less hepatic glucose production. Effects with obvious implications for nearly every chronic disease of our time.

---

The honest summary of the research since 2023: berberine modestly lowers fasting glucose, improves insulin sensitivity, lowers LDL and triglycerides, and supports some weight loss. The effects are not dramatic. They are remarkably consistent. That distinction matters.

---

In practice it behaves less like Ozempic and more like a naturally derived cousin of metformin. Which is exactly why researchers keep investigating it for prediabetes, type 2 diabetes, metabolic syndrome, fatty liver disease (MASLD), and PCOS.

---

Compounds like this remind us that biology rarely works through a single pathway. Same problem with ivermectin. The FDA blocked our COVID trials by demanding we first prove mechanism of action in tissue culture. An impossible, absurd standard for an already-approved drug.

---

Here is the part that fascinates me most. Berberine has notoriously poor oral bioavailability, yet it consistently produces metabolic effects. The likely explanation: it reshapes the gut microbiome. Metabolism, immunity, inflammation and the microbiome operate as one connected system.

---

Then there are the cancer data. A 2020 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of more than 1,100 patients who had colorectal adenomas removed. Recurrence was roughly 36% on berberine versus 47% on placebo. For an inexpensive natural compound, that is a very big deal.

---

So why don't we have large trials? Not because berberine lacks biological activity. Because it lacks patent protection. No exclusivity means no billion-dollar incentive to fund Phase III studies. The missing evidence reflects market failure, not scientific failure.

---

One caveat before anyone empties the supplement aisle. Berberine is not risk-free. It can interact with drugs for diabetes, blood pressure, and anticoagulation, and product quality varies widely. Talk to your provider. None of this is medical advice.

---

That should make all of us cautious about equating "lack of evidence" with "lack of efficacy." Sometimes the most useful therapies have been sitting quietly in nature all along. Full essay, with references, the cancer data, and the FDA revolving-door story behind the ivermectin trials:

https://www.malone.news/p/well-being-berberine-revisited

Subscribe free at Malone News.

📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

For decades the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) has been America's self-appointed watchdog of hate groups. A new federal superseding indictment suggests it may have spent years quietly funding them. The story is so strange Hollywood would have rejected the script as too implausible. 🧵

---

Per a New York Post report on the indictment, a senior SPLC official, identified by the Post as former Intelligence Project director Heidi Beirich, allegedly directed roughly $1.2 million in donor funds to a confidential informant embedded in the neo-Nazi National Alliance. The twist: prosecutors allege the informant was also her lover.

---

According to the indictment, the two shared a home and joint bank accounts. Around $140,000 in donor money allegedly flowed into those accounts between 2015 and 2021, reportedly about 66% of everything ever deposited there, and went toward the couple's personal living expenses.

---

Strip away the labels and the alleged scheme is simple. Donor money meant to fight neo-Nazis was allegedly paid to a neo-Nazi, deposited in a shared account, and spent on the couple's bills. In ordinary language that has names: theft, or money laundering.

---

And it allegedly was not one rogue actor. The DOJ accuses the SPLC of routing more than $4 million in tax-exempt funds to informants inside extremist groups, while using those same groups as fundraising targets. One alleged recipient was an Imperial Wizard of the United Klans of America.

---

Imagine donating to fight neo-Nazis only to learn your check may have helped pay one's mortgage. It is roughly like discovering your anti-smoking charity had quietly put the Marlboro Man on retainer.

---

This is bigger than the SPLC. Entire industries now exist to find threats, monitor threats, fundraise against threats, and publicize threats. If your business model depends on monsters under the bed, you have every incentive to make sure the monsters never disappear. Or to manufacture new ones. Another self-licking ice cream cone.

---

One thing is already clear. If a conservative group stood accused of funneling donor money through a romance to a neo-Nazi operative, we would have twenty-four-hour wall-to-wall coverage. Instead, much of the liberal press seems oddly incurious. Apparently some hate groups are more special than others.

---

There is a sequel. After leaving the SPLC in 2020, that same official co-founded a new anti-extremism outfit, funded not by small donors but by a familiar roster of foundations. Discovery has a funny way of turning career investigators into the ones suddenly answering questions.

---

To be clear: no one named has been convicted, and the successor group has not been charged. But the coming trial is really about accountability. At what point does infiltrating an organization become subsidizing it? This case may force a jury to decide exactly where that line sits.

---

Our full piece on the SPLC, the indictment, and the hate-industrial complex that grew up around it:
https://www.malone.news/p/the-neo-nazi-lovers-of-the-hate-industrial

📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD

True story.
“The Southern Poverty Law Center is manufacturing racism to justify its existence,”
-Acting Attorney General, Todd Blanche

📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD