The DOJ just announced the largest healthcare fraud takedown in American history. 455 defendants. More than $6.5 billion in fraudulent claims. That is over $14 million bilked from the federal government per defendant.
The yachts and the jewelry are not the story.
---
Healthcare fraud has become a primary target of transnational organized crime, alongside illegal drugs and human trafficking. Suspects were arrested in Cyprus, Estonia, and the Philippines, tied to schemes totaling more than $15 billion.
Medicare is now a global target.
---
For most of Medicare's history, fraud was investigated after the fact. Claims were paid, and years later someone tried to trace the money. Closing the barn door after the horse was already gone.
By then the funds were offshore. Recovery was difficult, and often impossible.
---
That reactive model is changing. CMS has invested in advanced analytics, machine learning, and AI built to flag suspicious billing in near real time.
The criminals are using the same toolkit against the system, including AI-generated videos of fake telemedicine visits. Cat and mouse, both now armed with AI.
---
The clearest example is the new WISeR initiative, short for Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction. Machine learning, AI, and human clinical review, aimed at stopping improper payments before they are made instead of chasing them afterward.
---
Here is what nearly all of the coverage missed. The process is the story.
Every claim, prescription, referral, and supplier relationship leaves a digital footprint. Break down the data silos, fuse the streams, and a criminal network hidden across dozens of shell companies and multiple states becomes obvious.
---
This is a change in what CMS is. Under Administrator Mehmet Oz it is shifting from a reimbursement organization into one of the most sophisticated data analysis and fraud detection operations in government.
If that transformation succeeds, it will not stay confined to healthcare for long.
---
That is the part worth sitting with. The same tools that catch billing fraud can be aimed at tax fraud, procurement fraud, disability fraud, and money laundering.
Expect it to reach defense contracts, the IRS, infrastructure spending, and university research grants with their notorious indirect costs. Eventually it reaches the rest of us.
---
While the public argues about chatbots and image generators, the most consequential uses of AI are being built quietly inside government agencies. Continuous analysis of enormous datasets to flag suspicious patterns before anything happens.
Medicare fraud detection may be only the beginning.
---
A note on the coverage itself. Per Ground News, this ran mostly in center-leaning and right-leaning outlets and drew little from the left. A historic $6.5 billion case with hundreds of defendants should be wall to wall regardless of who it makes look good. A government success story apparently is not.
---
Now the hard part, and it cuts across party lines. Recall the film Minority Report and its precogs predicting crime before it happens. Substitute real-time AI screening for the precogs and you have the trajectory.
The same system that flags a billion-dollar fraud ring can flag an honest physician as a statistical outlier.
---
Anyone who has received an automated traffic camera ticket knows the dynamic. The machine flags you, a notice arrives, and the burden shifts to you to prove it wrong. Efficient is not the same as accurate.
A specialist in difficult cases or a rural practice can look abnormal against an average. Courts have repeatedly held that unusual billing alone is not fraud. Using AI to delay or deny care before it is given is more dangerous still. We need legislation to protect civil liberties now, not later.
---
The takedown protects taxpayer dollars today. The deeper story is the arrival of algorithm-assisted, precrime-style oversight as a routine feature of the administrative state. The surveillance state does not shrink on its own, and it does not care which party builds it.
Good luck holding onto personhood and sovereignty in that world. Be careful what you wish for.
Full essay:
https://www.malone.news/p/the-dojs-medicare-fraud-takedown
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
The yachts and the jewelry are not the story.
---
Healthcare fraud has become a primary target of transnational organized crime, alongside illegal drugs and human trafficking. Suspects were arrested in Cyprus, Estonia, and the Philippines, tied to schemes totaling more than $15 billion.
Medicare is now a global target.
---
For most of Medicare's history, fraud was investigated after the fact. Claims were paid, and years later someone tried to trace the money. Closing the barn door after the horse was already gone.
By then the funds were offshore. Recovery was difficult, and often impossible.
---
That reactive model is changing. CMS has invested in advanced analytics, machine learning, and AI built to flag suspicious billing in near real time.
The criminals are using the same toolkit against the system, including AI-generated videos of fake telemedicine visits. Cat and mouse, both now armed with AI.
---
The clearest example is the new WISeR initiative, short for Wasteful and Inappropriate Service Reduction. Machine learning, AI, and human clinical review, aimed at stopping improper payments before they are made instead of chasing them afterward.
---
Here is what nearly all of the coverage missed. The process is the story.
Every claim, prescription, referral, and supplier relationship leaves a digital footprint. Break down the data silos, fuse the streams, and a criminal network hidden across dozens of shell companies and multiple states becomes obvious.
---
This is a change in what CMS is. Under Administrator Mehmet Oz it is shifting from a reimbursement organization into one of the most sophisticated data analysis and fraud detection operations in government.
If that transformation succeeds, it will not stay confined to healthcare for long.
---
That is the part worth sitting with. The same tools that catch billing fraud can be aimed at tax fraud, procurement fraud, disability fraud, and money laundering.
Expect it to reach defense contracts, the IRS, infrastructure spending, and university research grants with their notorious indirect costs. Eventually it reaches the rest of us.
---
While the public argues about chatbots and image generators, the most consequential uses of AI are being built quietly inside government agencies. Continuous analysis of enormous datasets to flag suspicious patterns before anything happens.
Medicare fraud detection may be only the beginning.
---
A note on the coverage itself. Per Ground News, this ran mostly in center-leaning and right-leaning outlets and drew little from the left. A historic $6.5 billion case with hundreds of defendants should be wall to wall regardless of who it makes look good. A government success story apparently is not.
---
Now the hard part, and it cuts across party lines. Recall the film Minority Report and its precogs predicting crime before it happens. Substitute real-time AI screening for the precogs and you have the trajectory.
The same system that flags a billion-dollar fraud ring can flag an honest physician as a statistical outlier.
---
Anyone who has received an automated traffic camera ticket knows the dynamic. The machine flags you, a notice arrives, and the burden shifts to you to prove it wrong. Efficient is not the same as accurate.
A specialist in difficult cases or a rural practice can look abnormal against an average. Courts have repeatedly held that unusual billing alone is not fraud. Using AI to delay or deny care before it is given is more dangerous still. We need legislation to protect civil liberties now, not later.
---
The takedown protects taxpayer dollars today. The deeper story is the arrival of algorithm-assisted, precrime-style oversight as a routine feature of the administrative state. The surveillance state does not shrink on its own, and it does not care which party builds it.
Good luck holding onto personhood and sovereignty in that world. Be careful what you wish for.
Full essay:
https://www.malone.news/p/the-dojs-medicare-fraud-takedown
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
www.malone.news
The DOJ’s Medicare Fraud Takedown Is About More Than Fraud
Audio :
❤71👍38💯17🙏11🤔1
Unfortunately, I agree -
Maybe even worse is that our Republican Congress won't support legislation to stop birthright citizenship.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍94🙏32🤬25😢6👎2❤1🥴1
Has the proposed amendment gotten any traction, with Thune in charge?
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
🤬75🙏28⚡8💯6❤2🔥1🤣1
Forwarded from Real-Time Daily News
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
"THE SENATE SUCKS."
"It's LAZINESS. It's disgusting."
"SENATE REPUBLICANS don't wanna do the right thing and debate the matter on the floor because it would take them away from their precious meetings. I'M SORRY. They have a responsibility to open up the floor and debate this issue in front of the American people!"
"I'm just gonna come out and say it. They suck. 80% of the American people want the SAVE America Act to pass."
"THE ONLY ORGANIZATION THAT REFUSES TO ACT IS THE US SENATE."
"Everybody else says this is common sense! Make sure only Americans are voting! Makes sense, right?!"
➡️ @RealTimeDailyNews
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍173💯156❤38👏18🙏9
When "Gay" Identification Becomes a Fad
https://www.malone.news/p/when-gay-identification-becomes-a
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
https://www.malone.news/p/when-gay-identification-becomes-a
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
www.malone.news
When "Gay" Identification Becomes a Fad
As Pride month draws to a close, it is time to reflect on just where that movement has taken America over the last decade.
🤮133💯14🙏7💔4👎2
let’s be honest, the liberal media making a BFD over a few dead ducks has got to be one of the funniest news stories yet.
News flash: we eat animals. Americans eat billions of animals a year, and they even eat ducks.
---
Furthermore, a pair of ducks has about a zillion babies a year because baby ducklings usually don’t survive to adulthood. It has nothing to do with the quality of water, everything to do with what terrible parents ducks are- and that is why they have about 20 ducklings at a time.
---
So, then why are they running these stories? Is it really about making President Trump look bad? Of course it is.
---
Which is why, each week - we put out the Friday Funnies, a round-up of the funniest memes, cartoons and video on the web.
Let's counter those negative liberal media vibes, with some good ones of our own!
Click on the link to be entertained and amused:
https://www.malone.news/p/friday-funnies-crooked-lies-and-temporary
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
News flash: we eat animals. Americans eat billions of animals a year, and they even eat ducks.
---
Furthermore, a pair of ducks has about a zillion babies a year because baby ducklings usually don’t survive to adulthood. It has nothing to do with the quality of water, everything to do with what terrible parents ducks are- and that is why they have about 20 ducklings at a time.
---
So, then why are they running these stories? Is it really about making President Trump look bad? Of course it is.
---
Which is why, each week - we put out the Friday Funnies, a round-up of the funniest memes, cartoons and video on the web.
Let's counter those negative liberal media vibes, with some good ones of our own!
Click on the link to be entertained and amused:
https://www.malone.news/p/friday-funnies-crooked-lies-and-temporary
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
www.malone.news
Friday Funnies: Crooked Lies and Temporary Status
Thanks for reading Malone News!
💯80❤31👍5🤡4😁3🤨3
It is hard to imagine, but if half of those 51,000 missing in Venezuela are under the rubble and most likely dead... The scale of this disaster is off the charts.
"Venezuela (AP) — Venezuelans took the search for missing loved ones into their own hands Friday in the aftermath of back-to-back earthquakes, citing the scarcity of government rescuers, as the human toll of the disaster climbed to at least 920 dead and more than 51,000 missing."
Heartbreaking.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
"Venezuela (AP) — Venezuelans took the search for missing loved ones into their own hands Friday in the aftermath of back-to-back earthquakes, citing the scarcity of government rescuers, as the human toll of the disaster climbed to at least 920 dead and more than 51,000 missing."
Heartbreaking.
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
💔160🙏106😢20❤7👍1
🧵 A $700 million revolution in how America farms?
That number is 1% of USDA’s conservation budget.
President Trump’s regenerative agriculture order has MAHA cheering a transformation. The fine print tells a smaller story.
---
The order has real content. It directs USDA to expand its Regenerative Pilot Program, tells EPA to speed review of alternative crop-protection products, and builds new public-private partnerships.
But it requires no action beyond existing authority. This is an administrative roadmap, not a rewrite of agricultural law.
---
The headline number is a $700 million Regenerative Pilot Program. The coverage implies a massive new federal initiative.
It is not new. USDA announced it in December 2025, six months before the order. It was funded by redirecting conservation dollars already on the books: $400M from EQIP, $300M from CSP.
---
So how big is $700 million in context?
It is 1% of USDA’s $70 billion ten-year conservation portfolio.
One percent.
---
Now compare it to the rest of the budget.
Crop insurance: roughly $15 to $16 billion every year.
Commodity programs: well over $100 billion this decade.
Corn alone: nearly $40 billion.
Wheat: more than $20 billion.
The pilot is a rounding error.
---
As long as Congress subsidizes industrial commodity production at that scale, regenerative agriculture starts at a structural disadvantage.
The government is telling farmers it would like them to change, while making it less risky and more profitable to keep farming the old way.
---
The headlines suggest a revolution.
The budget suggests an experiment.
---
The order is framed as part of Make America Healthy Again. Healthier soil, healthier plants, healthier people.
That is the aspiration. The order itself sets no nutrient-density standard, no food-quality monitoring, and no framework to demonstrate health improvements. Aspiration is not yet outcome.
---
The most revealing language is not about farming. It is about public-private partnerships.
USDA links the effort to a proposed Regenerative Feedstock Rule and a Feedstock Carbon Intensity Calculator. Those build the machinery to certify, score, and monetize farm commodities.
More measurement. More reporting. More big government.
---
Then there is the chemical question. In the Roundup case, the administration argued federal labeling law shields Bayer from many state failure-to-warn claims. Much of MAHA saw a betrayal.
The order hints at a different play: reduce chemical dependence through economics rather than regulation. Whether that can work is another matter.
---
The real obstacle is scale. American agriculture was built on the Earl Butz model: plant fence row to fence row, maximize yield, rely on inputs. Every major federal program is wired to that philosophy.
A $700 million pilot will not overturn it. Farmers, not executive orders, will decide.
---
This order is neither empty symbolism nor transformational reform. It is substance, potential, hype, and political spin in one package.
The full analysis, including the Feedstock Rule and the chemical strategy:
https://www.malone.news/p/regenerative-agriculture-a-national
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
That number is 1% of USDA’s conservation budget.
President Trump’s regenerative agriculture order has MAHA cheering a transformation. The fine print tells a smaller story.
---
The order has real content. It directs USDA to expand its Regenerative Pilot Program, tells EPA to speed review of alternative crop-protection products, and builds new public-private partnerships.
But it requires no action beyond existing authority. This is an administrative roadmap, not a rewrite of agricultural law.
---
The headline number is a $700 million Regenerative Pilot Program. The coverage implies a massive new federal initiative.
It is not new. USDA announced it in December 2025, six months before the order. It was funded by redirecting conservation dollars already on the books: $400M from EQIP, $300M from CSP.
---
So how big is $700 million in context?
It is 1% of USDA’s $70 billion ten-year conservation portfolio.
One percent.
---
Now compare it to the rest of the budget.
Crop insurance: roughly $15 to $16 billion every year.
Commodity programs: well over $100 billion this decade.
Corn alone: nearly $40 billion.
Wheat: more than $20 billion.
The pilot is a rounding error.
---
As long as Congress subsidizes industrial commodity production at that scale, regenerative agriculture starts at a structural disadvantage.
The government is telling farmers it would like them to change, while making it less risky and more profitable to keep farming the old way.
---
The headlines suggest a revolution.
The budget suggests an experiment.
---
The order is framed as part of Make America Healthy Again. Healthier soil, healthier plants, healthier people.
That is the aspiration. The order itself sets no nutrient-density standard, no food-quality monitoring, and no framework to demonstrate health improvements. Aspiration is not yet outcome.
---
The most revealing language is not about farming. It is about public-private partnerships.
USDA links the effort to a proposed Regenerative Feedstock Rule and a Feedstock Carbon Intensity Calculator. Those build the machinery to certify, score, and monetize farm commodities.
More measurement. More reporting. More big government.
---
Then there is the chemical question. In the Roundup case, the administration argued federal labeling law shields Bayer from many state failure-to-warn claims. Much of MAHA saw a betrayal.
The order hints at a different play: reduce chemical dependence through economics rather than regulation. Whether that can work is another matter.
---
The real obstacle is scale. American agriculture was built on the Earl Butz model: plant fence row to fence row, maximize yield, rely on inputs. Every major federal program is wired to that philosophy.
A $700 million pilot will not overturn it. Farmers, not executive orders, will decide.
---
This order is neither empty symbolism nor transformational reform. It is substance, potential, hype, and political spin in one package.
The full analysis, including the Feedstock Rule and the chemical strategy:
https://www.malone.news/p/regenerative-agriculture-a-national
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
www.malone.news
Regenerative Agriculture: A National Revolution or an Experiment?
President Trump’s Executive Order on Advancing Regenerative Agriculture has generated considerable enthusiasm among supporters of the MAHA movement.
👍48🤔22❤16🙏15👌1🤡1
Everyone is reading the Supreme Court's Roundup decision as a fight about glyphosate. Much of MAHA called it a betrayal.
The more I studied the opinion, the more I concluded it is not really about glyphosate at all. 🧵
---
The justices did not weigh epidemiology. They did not rule on whether glyphosate causes cancer. They did not pick IARC or EPA as the better science.
They answered a narrow legal question with enormous consequences.
---
The question: when EPA approves a pesticide label under FIFRA, can a state jury later decide the manufacturer should have warned more strongly?
The Court's answer was largely no. EPA-approved labels now preempt most state failure-to-warn claims.
---
Why does that reach beyond Roundup?
State failure-to-warn lawsuits have been one of the few mechanisms that surface emerging risk. Tobacco. Asbestos. Lead paint. PFAS. Discovery forced disclosure. Experts testified under oath. Regulators defended their conclusions in open court.
---
That pathway just narrowed dramatically.
When an EPA label preempts the claim, EPA becomes the gatekeeper for deciding when evolving science justifies a new warning. That authority no longer rests with juries hearing new evidence. It rests with one federal agency.
---
So here is the real question, and it is a constitutional one:
Can Congress create a system in which a single federal agency becomes the exclusive gatekeeper for whether evolving scientific evidence ever reaches an American jury?
---
This is hard to square with two decisions constitutional conservatives celebrated.
Dobbs returned power to the states. Loper Bright said courts, not agencies, interpret statutes.
Here, an agency's determination became the basis for closing the courthouse door.
---
Note who stood where. The Biden administration did not embrace the broad preemption argument. The Trump administration did.
Ironically, the Biden position sat closer to conservative legal principles: preserve juries, respect state common law, do not expand the administrative state.
---
The decision assumes EPA will revisit labels as science evolves. Look at the record.
Glyphosate entered review in 2009. EPA reaffirmed "not likely carcinogenic" in 2020. The Ninth Circuit faulted that analysis. EPA withdrew it. More than fifteen years in, still no final determination.
---
Meanwhile the science moved past cancer.
Researchers are now studying endocrine disruption, the gut microbiome, metabolic disease, reproductive and developmental toxicity, neuroinflammation, and cumulative exposure to many chemicals at once.
The questions themselves have changed.
---
Freeze the courts to EPA's pace and you freeze more than yesterday's conclusions. You freeze yesterday's understanding of which questions even deserve investigation.
That is a dangerous place for science and for public health.
---
One more point. If EPA's science now forecloses jury claims, EPA's independence is no longer just a regulatory issue. It is a civil-justice issue.
The FDA has faced years of scrutiny over capture and the revolving door. EPA has largely escaped it. This decision should end that.
---
This case is not really about glyphosate. It is about who decides when science has changed, and whether Americans keep access to the courts when new evidence emerges.
Full analysis:
https://www.malone.news/p/the-supreme-court-puts-the-epa-between
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
The more I studied the opinion, the more I concluded it is not really about glyphosate at all. 🧵
---
The justices did not weigh epidemiology. They did not rule on whether glyphosate causes cancer. They did not pick IARC or EPA as the better science.
They answered a narrow legal question with enormous consequences.
---
The question: when EPA approves a pesticide label under FIFRA, can a state jury later decide the manufacturer should have warned more strongly?
The Court's answer was largely no. EPA-approved labels now preempt most state failure-to-warn claims.
---
Why does that reach beyond Roundup?
State failure-to-warn lawsuits have been one of the few mechanisms that surface emerging risk. Tobacco. Asbestos. Lead paint. PFAS. Discovery forced disclosure. Experts testified under oath. Regulators defended their conclusions in open court.
---
That pathway just narrowed dramatically.
When an EPA label preempts the claim, EPA becomes the gatekeeper for deciding when evolving science justifies a new warning. That authority no longer rests with juries hearing new evidence. It rests with one federal agency.
---
So here is the real question, and it is a constitutional one:
Can Congress create a system in which a single federal agency becomes the exclusive gatekeeper for whether evolving scientific evidence ever reaches an American jury?
---
This is hard to square with two decisions constitutional conservatives celebrated.
Dobbs returned power to the states. Loper Bright said courts, not agencies, interpret statutes.
Here, an agency's determination became the basis for closing the courthouse door.
---
Note who stood where. The Biden administration did not embrace the broad preemption argument. The Trump administration did.
Ironically, the Biden position sat closer to conservative legal principles: preserve juries, respect state common law, do not expand the administrative state.
---
The decision assumes EPA will revisit labels as science evolves. Look at the record.
Glyphosate entered review in 2009. EPA reaffirmed "not likely carcinogenic" in 2020. The Ninth Circuit faulted that analysis. EPA withdrew it. More than fifteen years in, still no final determination.
---
Meanwhile the science moved past cancer.
Researchers are now studying endocrine disruption, the gut microbiome, metabolic disease, reproductive and developmental toxicity, neuroinflammation, and cumulative exposure to many chemicals at once.
The questions themselves have changed.
---
Freeze the courts to EPA's pace and you freeze more than yesterday's conclusions. You freeze yesterday's understanding of which questions even deserve investigation.
That is a dangerous place for science and for public health.
---
One more point. If EPA's science now forecloses jury claims, EPA's independence is no longer just a regulatory issue. It is a civil-justice issue.
The FDA has faced years of scrutiny over capture and the revolving door. EPA has largely escaped it. This decision should end that.
---
This case is not really about glyphosate. It is about who decides when science has changed, and whether Americans keep access to the courts when new evidence emerges.
Full analysis:
https://www.malone.news/p/the-supreme-court-puts-the-epa-between
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
www.malone.news
The Supreme Court Puts the EPA Between Patients and the Jury
and this may change every future chemical exposure case
👍60🤔29❤26⚡7🙏7🤨5🥰1🤬1
Forwarded from Real-Time Daily News
Voting has consequences. Canada voted for socialism, higher taxes, more regulations, less freedom.
Business investors decided to go elsewhere.
This is why Canada would be ranked near the bottom compared to every state in the USA.
➡️ @RealTimeDailyNews
Business investors decided to go elsewhere.
This is why Canada would be ranked near the bottom compared to every state in the USA.
➡️ @RealTimeDailyNews
💯114🔥21👎8👍7❤4🤣2🤔1👌1
Real-Time Daily News
Voting has consequences. Canada voted for socialism, higher taxes, more regulations, less freedom. Business investors decided to go elsewhere. This is why Canada would be ranked near the bottom compared to every state in the USA. ➡️ @RealTimeDailyNews
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
👍49🥰10🤣1
Sunday Strip: Hold My Beer
https://www.malone.news/p/sunday-strip-hold-my-beer
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
https://www.malone.news/p/sunday-strip-hold-my-beer
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
www.malone.news
Sunday Strip: Hold My Beer
One of the stranger developments in modern political journalism is that pregnancy itself has apparently become a partisan act.
❤38👍20🤣10🔥5😢1
Forwarded from Real-Time Daily News
USAID had 64 years and $2 trillion to end world hunger.
The Left is acting like all they needed was 1 more year.
By ending USAID the funding for Communism and was drastically cut.
Less Communism did more to end world hunger than anything USAID did during its entire existence.
➡️ @RealTimeDailyNews
The Left is acting like all they needed was 1 more year.
By ending USAID the funding for Communism and was drastically cut.
Less Communism did more to end world hunger than anything USAID did during its entire existence.
➡️ @RealTimeDailyNews
👍112💯84❤9👏7🙏2
Real-Time Daily News
USAID had 64 years and $2 trillion to end world hunger. The Left is acting like all they needed was 1 more year. By ending USAID the funding for Communism and was drastically cut. Less Communism did more to end world hunger than anything USAID did during…
Please open Telegram to view this post
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
💯81👏4❤3
Mainstream media today is reporting about 1,500+ dead in Venezuela.
When are they "allowed" to say that 50,000+ (up to 100K) are dead and who controls that narrative?
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
When are they "allowed" to say that 50,000+ (up to 100K) are dead and who controls that narrative?
📌Follow and Share👇🏻
🔬🧬 @RWMaloneMD
😢85💯26🙏19❤3
Forwarded from Real-Time Daily News
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
Will we ever truly know the origins of the COVID-19 virus? Former CDC Advisor and early pioneer of mRNA vaccine technology @RWMaloneMD tells @ DeeDeeNews "The CCP and the People's Liberation Army came in early and destroyed the records" and that he "does not rule out the possibility of intentional release."
➡️ @RealTimeDailyNews
➡️ @RealTimeDailyNews
💯98👏9❤7👎1🤣1
Forwarded from Real-Time Daily News
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
How can the US gov & health organizations regain trust of the public?
Dr. Robert Malone @RWMaloneMD gives The National News Desk his take and his prediction as to what will come of Dr. Anthony Fauci.
"What I'd like to see is his pension revoked… also setting him up for civil liability…"
➡️ @RealTimeDailyNews
Dr. Robert Malone @RWMaloneMD gives The National News Desk his take and his prediction as to what will come of Dr. Anthony Fauci.
"What I'd like to see is his pension revoked… also setting him up for civil liability…"
➡️ @RealTimeDailyNews
💯111👍8❤5👏4🔥3
Forwarded from Zelenko Freedom Foundation
This media is not supported in your browser
VIEW IN TELEGRAM
In its zeal to promote universal vaccination, @ gavi, the Vaccine Alliance has neglected the key issue of vaccine safety. When vaccine safety issues have come before GAVI, it has treated them not as a patient health problem, but as a public relations problem.
During the COVID-19 pandemic, GAVI partnered with the World Health Organization to recommend best practices for social media companies to silence dissenting views and to stifle free speech and legitimate questions during that period.
GAVI should consider the best science available, even when that science contradicts established paradigms. It should define success not just in terms of the number of vaccines delivered, but on their rigorously measured overall impacts.
I call on GAVI to re-earn the public trust and to justify the $8 billion dollars that America has provided in funding since 2001. Until that happens the United States won’t contribute more to GAVI. Business as usual is over.
Please follow us @ZFoundation
During the COVID-19 pandemic, GAVI partnered with the World Health Organization to recommend best practices for social media companies to silence dissenting views and to stifle free speech and legitimate questions during that period.
GAVI should consider the best science available, even when that science contradicts established paradigms. It should define success not just in terms of the number of vaccines delivered, but on their rigorously measured overall impacts.
I call on GAVI to re-earn the public trust and to justify the $8 billion dollars that America has provided in funding since 2001. Until that happens the United States won’t contribute more to GAVI. Business as usual is over.
Please follow us @ZFoundation
🔥99👏46❤9👌5